Systematic review and meta-analysis of hypothermic machine perfusion versus static cold storage of kidney allografts on transplant outcomes

BACKGROUND

Adequate preservation of renal allografts for transplantation is important for maintaining and improving transplant outcomes. There are two prevalent methods: hypothermic machine perfusion and static cold storage. The preferred method of storage, however, remains controversial. The objective was to review systematically the evidence comparing outcomes from these two modalities.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, the Transplant Library and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. The final date for searches was 30 November 2012. Studies were assessed for methodological quality. Summary effects were calculated as relative risk (RR) with 95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.). Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs were included, but evaluated separately. Results from RCTs alone were used for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria, including seven RCTs (1475 kidneys) and 11 non-RCTs (728 kidneys). The overall risk of delayed graft function was lower with hypothermic machine perfusion than static cold storage (RR 0·81, 95 per cent c.i. 0·71 to 0·92; P = 0·002). There was no difference in the rate of primary non-function (RR 1·15, 0·46 to 2·90; P = 0·767). There was a faster initial fall in the level of serum creatinine with hypothermic machine perfusion in two RCTs, but not in another. There was no relationship between rates of acute rejection or patient survival and the method of preservation.

CONCLUSION

Data from the included studies suggest that hypothermic machine perfusion reduces delayed graft function compared with static cold storage. There was no difference in primary non-function, acute rejection, long-term renal function or patient survival. A difference in renal graft survival is uncertain.

Machine perfusion viability testing

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pretransplant assessment of kidney graft viability may help clinicians to decide whether to accept or discard a kidney for transplantation. With the increasing demand for donor kidneys and the increased use of marginal kidneys, the need of viability markers has increased to pursue superior transplant outcomes. Hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) provides the theoretical opportunity to assess the viability of donor kidneys. We discuss the novel developments in viability testing during HMP and address the future prospects.

RECENT FINDINGS

HMP viability testing has focused on the analysis of machine perfusion parameters and perfusate biomarkers. Renal resistance and the biomarkers lactate dehydrogenase, aspartate transaminase, glutathione-S-transferase, N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase, heart-type fatty acid binding protein, lipid peroxidation products, redox-active iron and IL-18 are correlated with transplant outcome in terms of development of delayed graft function or graft survival. However, they all lack adequate predictive value for transplant outcome. New techniques including contrast-enhanced ultrasound, three-dimensional ultrasound and magnetic resonance spectrometry are promising methods to test kidney viability during HMP, but their value has to be established. The introduction of normothermic machine perfusion offers other promising opportunities for viability testing.

SUMMARY

Machine perfusion characteristics and perfusate biomarkers have been extensively studied. They often correlate with the transplant outcome, but the present viability tests are not reliable predictors of transplant outcome. New developments in kidney graft viability assessment are necessary to have a chance of being clinically useful in the future.