51
|
Dikici E, Nguyen XV, Bigelow M, Prevedello LM. Augmented Networks for Faster Brain Metastases Detection in T1-Weighted Contrast-Enhanced 3D MRI. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2022; 98:102059. [DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2022.102059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2021] [Revised: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
52
|
Zhao K, Zhao Q, Zhou P, Liu B, Zhang Q, Yang M. Can Artificial Intelligence Be Applied to Diagnose Intracerebral Hemorrhage under the Background of the Fourth Industrial Revolution? A Novel Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Clin Pract 2022; 2022:9430097. [PMID: 35685590 PMCID: PMC9159188 DOI: 10.1155/2022/9430097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim We intended to provide the clinical evidence that artificial intelligence (AI) could be used to assist doctors in the diagnosis of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Methods Studies published in 2021 were identified after the literature search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane. Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) was used to perform the quality assessment of studies. Data extraction of diagnosis effect included accuracy (ACC), sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), area under curve (AUC), and Dice scores (Dices). The pooled effect with its 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was calculated by the random effects model. I-Square (I 2) was used to test heterogeneity. To check the stability of the overall results, sensitivity analysis was conducted by recalculating the pooled effect of the remaining studies after omitting the study with the highest quality or the random effects model was switched to the fixed effects model. Funnel plot was used to evaluate publication bias. To reduce heterogeneity, recalculating the pooled effect of the remaining studies after omitting the study with the lowest quality or perform subgroup analysis. Results Twenty-five diagnostic tests of ICH via AI and doctors with overall high quality were included. Pooled ACC, SEN, SPE, PPV, NPV, AUC, and Dices were 0.88 (0.83∼0.93), 0.85 (0.81∼0.89), 0.90 (0.88∼0.92), 0.80 (0.75∼0.85), 0.93 (0.91∼0.95), 0.84 (0.80∼0.89), and 0.90 (0.85∼0.95), respectively. There was no publication bias. All of results were stable as revealed by sensitivity analysis and were accordant as outcomes via subgroups analysis. Conclusion Under the background of the fourth industrial revolution, AI might be an effective and efficient tool to assist doctors in the clinical diagnosis of ICH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai Zhao
- Graduate School, Qinghai University, Xining 810016, Qinghai, China
| | - Qing Zhao
- Human Resource, Women's and Children's Hospital of Qinghai Province, Xining 810007, Qinghai, China
| | - Ping Zhou
- Department of Neurosurgery, Qinghai Provincial People's Hospital, Xining 810007, Qinghai, China
| | - Bin Liu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Qinghai Provincial People's Hospital, Xining 810007, Qinghai, China
| | - Qiang Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Qinghai Provincial People's Hospital, Xining 810007, Qinghai, China
| | - Mingfei Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Qinghai Provincial People's Hospital, Xining 810007, Qinghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Jayakumar S, Sounderajah V, Normahani P, Harling L, Markar SR, Ashrafian H, Darzi A. Quality assessment standards in artificial intelligence diagnostic accuracy systematic reviews: a meta-research study. NPJ Digit Med 2022; 5:11. [PMID: 35087178 PMCID: PMC8795185 DOI: 10.1038/s41746-021-00544-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2021] [Accepted: 11/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) centred diagnostic systems are increasingly recognised as robust solutions in healthcare delivery pathways. In turn, there has been a concurrent rise in secondary research studies regarding these technologies in order to influence key clinical and policymaking decisions. It is therefore essential that these studies accurately appraise methodological quality and risk of bias within shortlisted trials and reports. In order to assess whether this critical step is performed, we undertook a meta-research study evaluating adherence to the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool within AI diagnostic accuracy systematic reviews. A literature search was conducted on all studies published from 2000 to December 2020. Of 50 included reviews, 36 performed the quality assessment, of which 27 utilised the QUADAS-2 tool. Bias was reported across all four domains of QUADAS-2. Two hundred forty-three of 423 studies (57.5%) across all systematic reviews utilising QUADAS-2 reported a high or unclear risk of bias in the patient selection domain, 110 (26%) reported a high or unclear risk of bias in the index test domain, 121 (28.6%) in the reference standard domain and 157 (37.1%) in the flow and timing domain. This study demonstrates the incomplete uptake of quality assessment tools in reviews of AI-based diagnostic accuracy studies and highlights inconsistent reporting across all domains of quality assessment. Poor standards of reporting act as barriers to clinical implementation. The creation of an AI-specific extension for quality assessment tools of diagnostic accuracy AI studies may facilitate the safe translation of AI tools into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shruti Jayakumar
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Viknesh Sounderajah
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Pasha Normahani
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Leanne Harling
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Sheraz R Markar
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Hutan Ashrafian
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| | - Ara Darzi
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Yin S, Luo X, Yang Y, Shao Y, Ma L, Lin C, Yang Q, Wang D, Luo Y, Mai Z, Fan W, Zheng D, Li J, Cheng F, Zhang Y, Zhong X, Shen F, Shao G, Wu J, Sun Y, Luo H, Li C, Gao Y, Shen D, Zhang R, Xie C. OUP accepted manuscript. Neuro Oncol 2022; 24:1559-1570. [PMID: 35100427 PMCID: PMC9435500 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Ying Shao
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- R&D Department, Shanghai United Imaging Intelligence Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lidi Ma
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Cuiping Lin
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qiuxia Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Deling Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yingwei Luo
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhijun Mai
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Weixiong Fan
- Department of Magnetic Resonance, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine and Clinical Translational Research of Hakka Population, Meizhou People’s Hospital, Meizhou, China
| | - Dechun Zheng
- Department of Radiology, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
| | - Jianpeng Li
- Department Of Radiology, Affiliated Dongguan Hospital, Southern Medical University, Dongguan, China
| | - Fengyan Cheng
- Department of Magnetic Resonance, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine and Clinical Translational Research of Hakka Population, Meizhou People’s Hospital, Meizhou, China
| | - Yuhui Zhang
- Department of Magnetic Resonance, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine and Clinical Translational Research of Hakka Population, Meizhou People’s Hospital, Meizhou, China
| | - Xinwei Zhong
- Department of Magnetic Resonance, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine and Clinical Translational Research of Hakka Population, Meizhou People’s Hospital, Meizhou, China
| | - Fangmin Shen
- Department of Radiology, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
| | - Guohua Shao
- Department Of Radiology, Affiliated Dongguan Hospital, Southern Medical University, Dongguan, China
| | - Jiahao Wu
- Department Of Radiology, Affiliated Dongguan Hospital, Southern Medical University, Dongguan, China
| | - Ying Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Huiyan Luo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chaofeng Li
- Department of Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yaozong Gao
- R&D Department, Shanghai United Imaging Intelligence Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China
| | - Dinggang Shen
- School of Biomedical Engineering, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China
| | - Rong Zhang
- Rong Zhang, PhD, The Department of Radiology, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Yuexiu District, Guanzhou 510060, P.R. China ()
| | - Chuanmiao Xie
- Corresponding Authors: Chuanmiao Xie, PhD, The Department of Radiology, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Yuexiu District, Guanzhou 510060, P.R. China ()
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Tonse R, Rubens M, Appel H, Tom MC, Hall MD, Odia Y, McDermott MW, Ahluwalia MS, Mehta MP, Kotecha R. Systematic review and meta-analysis of lung cancer brain metastasis and primary tumor receptor expression discordance. Discov Oncol 2021; 12:48. [PMID: 35201504 PMCID: PMC8777541 DOI: 10.1007/s12672-021-00445-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment paradigms for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer are increasingly based on biomarker-driven therapies, with the most common alteration being mutation in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Change in expression of such biomarkers could have a profound impact on the choice and efficacy of a selected targeted therapeutic, and hence the objective of this study was to analyze discordance in EGFR status in patients with lung cancer brain metastasis (LCBM). METHODS Using PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was performed of series in the Medline database of biopsied or resected LCBM published before May, 2020. Key words included "lung cancer" and "brain metastasis" combined with "epidermal growth factor receptor/EGFR," and "receptor conversion/discordance or concordance." Weighted random effects models were used to calculate pooled estimates. RESULTS We identified 501 patients from 19 full-text articles for inclusion in this study. All patients underwent biopsy or resection of at least one intracranial lesion to compare to the primary tumor. On primary/LCBM comparison, the weighted pooled estimate for overall EGFR receptor discordance was 10% (95% CI 5-17%). The weighted effects model estimated a gain of an EGFR mutation in a brain metastases in patients with negative primary tumors was 7% (95% CI 4-12%). Alternatively, the weighted effects model estimate of loss of an EGFR mutation in patients with detected mutations in the primary tumor was also 7% (95% CI 4-10%). KRAS testing was also performed on both primary tumors and LCBM in a subset of 148 patients. The weighted effects estimate of KRAS-mutation discordance among LCBM compared to primary tumors was 13% (95% CI 5-27%). The weighted effects estimated of KRAS gain and loss in LCBM was 10% (95% CI 6-18%) and 8% (95% CI 4-15%), respectively. Meta-regression analysis did not find any association with any factors that could be associated with discordances. CONCLUSIONS EGFR and KRAS mutation status discordance between primary tumor and LCBM occurs in approximately 10% and 13% of patients, respectively. Evaluation of LCBM receptor status is key to biomarker-driven targeted therapy for intracranial disease and awareness of subtype switching is critical for those patients treated with systemic therapy alone for intracranial disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raees Tonse
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Office 1R203, Miami, FL, 33176, USA
| | - Muni Rubens
- Office of Clinical Research, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Haley Appel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Office 1R203, Miami, FL, 33176, USA
| | - Martin C Tom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Office 1R203, Miami, FL, 33176, USA
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Matthew D Hall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Office 1R203, Miami, FL, 33176, USA
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Yazmin Odia
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Michael W McDermott
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Miami Neuroscience Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Manmeet S Ahluwalia
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Minesh P Mehta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Office 1R203, Miami, FL, 33176, USA
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Rupesh Kotecha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Office 1R203, Miami, FL, 33176, USA.
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Cho J, Kim YJ, Sunwoo L, Lee GP, Nguyen TQ, Cho SJ, Baik SH, Bae YJ, Choi BS, Jung C, Sohn CH, Han JH, Kim CY, Kim KG, Kim JH. Deep Learning-Based Computer-Aided Detection System for Automated Treatment Response Assessment of Brain Metastases on 3D MRI. Front Oncol 2021; 11:739639. [PMID: 34778056 PMCID: PMC8579083 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.739639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although accurate treatment response assessment for brain metastases (BMs) is crucial, it is highly labor intensive. This retrospective study aimed to develop a computer-aided detection (CAD) system for automated BM detection and treatment response evaluation using deep learning. METHODS We included 214 consecutive MRI examinations of 147 patients with BM obtained between January 2015 and August 2016. These were divided into the training (174 MR images from 127 patients) and test datasets according to temporal separation (temporal test set #1; 40 MR images from 20 patients). For external validation, 24 patients with BM and 11 patients without BM from other institutions were included (geographic test set). In addition, we included 12 MRIs from BM patients obtained between August 2017 and March 2020 (temporal test set #2). Detection sensitivity, dice similarity coefficient (DSC) for segmentation, and agreements in one-dimensional and volumetric Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases (RANO-BM) criteria between CAD and radiologists were assessed. RESULTS In the temporal test set #1, the sensitivity was 75.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 69.6%, 79.9%), mean DSC was 0.69 ± 0.22, and false-positive (FP) rate per scan was 0.8 for BM ≥ 5 mm. Agreements in the RANO-BM criteria were moderate (κ, 0.52) and substantial (κ, 0.68) for one-dimensional and volumetric, respectively. In the geographic test set, sensitivity was 87.7% (95% CI: 77.2%, 94.5%), mean DSC was 0.68 ± 0.20, and FP rate per scan was 1.9 for BM ≥ 5 mm. In the temporal test set #2, sensitivity was 94.7% (95% CI: 74.0%, 99.9%), mean DSC was 0.82 ± 0.20, and FP per scan was 0.5 (6/12) for BM ≥ 5 mm. CONCLUSIONS Our CAD showed potential for automated treatment response assessment of BM ≥ 5 mm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jungheum Cho
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Young Jae Kim
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, South Korea
| | - Leonard Sunwoo
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
- Center for Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Gi Pyo Lee
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, South Korea
| | - Toan Quang Nguyen
- Department of Radiology, Vietnam National Cancer Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Se Jin Cho
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Sung Hyun Baik
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Yun Jung Bae
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Byung Se Choi
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Cheolkyu Jung
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Chul-Ho Sohn
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jung-Ho Han
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Chae-Yong Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Kwang Gi Kim
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, South Korea
| | - Jae Hyoung Kim
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Williams S, Layard Horsfall H, Funnell JP, Hanrahan JG, Khan DZ, Muirhead W, Stoyanov D, Marcus HJ. Artificial Intelligence in Brain Tumour Surgery-An Emerging Paradigm. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13195010. [PMID: 34638495 PMCID: PMC8508169 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13195010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Revised: 10/02/2021] [Accepted: 10/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) platforms have the potential to cause a paradigm shift in brain tumour surgery. Brain tumour surgery augmented with AI can result in safer and more effective treatment. In this review article, we explore the current and future role of AI in patients undergoing brain tumour surgery, including aiding diagnosis, optimising the surgical plan, providing support during the operation, and better predicting the prognosis. Finally, we discuss barriers to the successful clinical implementation, the ethical concerns, and we provide our perspective on how the field could be advanced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Williams
- Department of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London WC1N 3BG, UK; (H.L.H.); (J.P.F.); (J.G.H.); (D.Z.K.); (W.M.); (H.J.M.)
- Wellcome/Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS), London W1W 7TY, UK;
- Correspondence:
| | - Hugo Layard Horsfall
- Department of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London WC1N 3BG, UK; (H.L.H.); (J.P.F.); (J.G.H.); (D.Z.K.); (W.M.); (H.J.M.)
- Wellcome/Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS), London W1W 7TY, UK;
| | - Jonathan P. Funnell
- Department of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London WC1N 3BG, UK; (H.L.H.); (J.P.F.); (J.G.H.); (D.Z.K.); (W.M.); (H.J.M.)
- Wellcome/Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS), London W1W 7TY, UK;
| | - John G. Hanrahan
- Department of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London WC1N 3BG, UK; (H.L.H.); (J.P.F.); (J.G.H.); (D.Z.K.); (W.M.); (H.J.M.)
- Wellcome/Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS), London W1W 7TY, UK;
| | - Danyal Z. Khan
- Department of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London WC1N 3BG, UK; (H.L.H.); (J.P.F.); (J.G.H.); (D.Z.K.); (W.M.); (H.J.M.)
- Wellcome/Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS), London W1W 7TY, UK;
| | - William Muirhead
- Department of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London WC1N 3BG, UK; (H.L.H.); (J.P.F.); (J.G.H.); (D.Z.K.); (W.M.); (H.J.M.)
- Wellcome/Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS), London W1W 7TY, UK;
| | - Danail Stoyanov
- Wellcome/Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS), London W1W 7TY, UK;
| | - Hani J. Marcus
- Department of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London WC1N 3BG, UK; (H.L.H.); (J.P.F.); (J.G.H.); (D.Z.K.); (W.M.); (H.J.M.)
- Wellcome/Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS), London W1W 7TY, UK;
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Bhandari A, Purchuri SN, Sharma C, Ibrahim M, Prior M. Knowledge and attitudes towards artificial intelligence in imaging: a look at the quantitative survey literature. Clin Imaging 2021; 80:413-419. [PMID: 34537484 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Revised: 07/31/2021] [Accepted: 08/05/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES There exists many single sample perspectives on artificial intelligence (AI). The aim of this review was to collate the current data on attitudes/knowledge towards AI in three unique populations: medical students, clinicians and patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS A literature search was performed on PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science pertaining to survey data on AI in radiology. Quality assessment was performed by an adapted version of the assessment tool from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute for Observational Studies. RESULTS Fourteen studies were found on attitudes/knowledge towards AI in radiology. Four studies examined medical students, seven on clinicians and three on patient populations. Deficiencies in the literature mainly related to sampling bias. Students had anxiety relating to future job prospects. Clinicians were optimistic and viewed AI as an aid to the diagnosis and wanted to further their knowledge. Patients were concerned about the lack of human interaction and accountability during error. CONCLUSION Attitudes and knowledge regarding AI in radiology remains a topic that needs to be researched further and education given pertaining to its use in a clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhishta Bhandari
- Townsville University Hospital, 100 Angus Smith Drive, Douglas, Townsville, QLD, Australia.
| | | | - Chinmay Sharma
- Townsville University Hospital, 100 Angus Smith Drive, Douglas, Townsville, QLD, Australia
| | - Muhammad Ibrahim
- Townsville University Hospital, 100 Angus Smith Drive, Douglas, Townsville, QLD, Australia
| | - Marita Prior
- Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Neves ER, Harley BAC, Pedron S. Microphysiological systems to study tumor-stroma interactions in brain cancer. Brain Res Bull 2021; 174:220-229. [PMID: 34166771 PMCID: PMC8324563 DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2021.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2021] [Revised: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Brain tumors still lack effective treatments, and the mechanisms of tumor progression and therapeutic resistance are unclear. Multiple parameters affect cancer prognosis (e.g., type and grade, age, location, size, and genetic mutations) and election of suitable treatments is based on preclinical models and clinical data. However, most candidate drugs fail in human trials due to inefficacy. Cell lines and tissue culture plates do not provide physiologically relevant environments, and animal models are not able to adequately mimic characteristics of disease in humans. Therefore, increasing technological advances are focusing on in vitro and computational modeling to increase the throughput and predicting capabilities of preclinical systems. The extensive use of these therapeutic agents requires a more profound understanding of the tumor-stroma interactions, including neural tissue, extracellular matrix, blood-brain barrier, astrocytes and microglia. Microphysiological brain tumor models offer physiologically relevant vascularized 'minitumors' that can help deciphering disease mechanisms, accelerating the drug discovery and predicting patient's response to anticancer treatments. This article reviews progress in tumor-on-a-chip platforms that are designed to comprehend the particular roles of stromal cells in the brain tumor microenvironment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward R Neves
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Carl R Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
| | - Brendan A C Harley
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Carl R Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
| | - Sara Pedron
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Carl R Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
60
|
Jubair F, Al-Karadsheh O, Malamos D, Al Mahdi S, Saad Y, Hassona Y. A novel lightweight deep convolutional neural network for early detection of oral cancer. Oral Dis 2021; 28:1123-1130. [PMID: 33636041 DOI: 10.1111/odi.13825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2020] [Revised: 01/30/2021] [Accepted: 02/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop a lightweight deep convolutional neural network (CNN) for binary classification of oral lesions into benign and malignant or potentially malignant using standard real-time clinical images. METHODS A small deep CNN, that uses a pretrained EfficientNet-B0 as a lightweight transfer learning model, was proposed. A data set of 716 clinical images was used to train and test the proposed model. Accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, receiver operating characteristics (ROC) and area under curve (AUC) were used to evaluate performance. Bootstrapping with 120 repetitions was used to calculate arithmetic means and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS The proposed CNN model achieved an accuracy of 85.0% (95% CI: 81.0%-90.0%), a specificity of 84.5% (95% CI: 78.9%-91.5%), a sensitivity of 86.7% (95% CI: 80.4%-93.3%) and an AUC of 0.928 (95% CI: 0.88-0.96). CONCLUSIONS Deep CNNs can be an effective method to build low-budget embedded vision devices with limited computation power and memory capacity for diagnosis of oral cancer. Artificial intelligence (AI) can improve the quality and reach of oral cancer screening and early detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fahed Jubair
- Computer Engineering Department, School of Engineering, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Omar Al-Karadsheh
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Oral Medicine, and Periodontics, School of Dentistry, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Dimitrios Malamos
- Oral Medicine Clinic, 1st Regional Health District of Attica, National Organization for the Provision of Health Services, Athens, Greece
| | - Samara Al Mahdi
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Oral Medicine, and Periodontics, School of Dentistry, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Yusser Saad
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Oral Medicine, and Periodontics, School of Dentistry, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Yazan Hassona
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Oral Medicine, and Periodontics, School of Dentistry, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
Vitale A, Villa R, Ugga L, Romeo V, Stanzione A, Cuocolo R. Artificial intelligence applied to neuroimaging data in Parkinsonian syndromes: Actuality and expectations. MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES AND ENGINEERING : MBE 2021; 18:1753-1773. [PMID: 33757209 DOI: 10.3934/mbe.2021091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease (iPD) is a common motor neurodegenerative disorder. It affects more frequently the elderly population, causing a significant emotional burden both for the patient and caregivers, due to the disease-related onset of motor and cognitive disabilities. iPD's clinical hallmark is the onset of cardinal motor symptoms such as bradykinesia, rest tremor, rigidity, and postural instability. However, these symptoms appear when the neurodegenerative process is already in an advanced stage. Furthermore, the greatest challenge is to distinguish iPD from other similar neurodegenerative disorders, "atypical parkinsonisms", such as Multisystem Atrophy, Progressive Supranuclear Palsy and Cortical Basal Degeneration, since they share many phenotypic manifestations, especially in the early stages. The diagnosis of these neurodegenerative motor disorders is essentially clinical. Consequently, the diagnostic accuracy mainly depends on the professional knowledge and experience of the physician. Recent advances in artificial intelligence have made it possible to analyze the large amount of clinical and instrumental information in the medical field. The application machine learning algorithms to the analysis of neuroimaging data appear to be a promising tool for identifying microstructural alterations related to the pathological process in order to explain the onset of symptoms and the spread of the neurodegenerative process. In this context, the search for quantitative biomarkers capable of identifying parkinsonian patients in the prodromal phases of the disease, of correctly distinguishing them from atypical parkinsonisms and of predicting clinical evolution and response to therapy represent the main goal of most current clinical research studies. Our aim was to review the recent literature and describe the current knowledge about the contribution given by machine learning applications to research and clinical management of parkinsonian syndromes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annalisa Vitale
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico Ⅱ", Via S. Pansini 5, 80131-Naples, Italy
| | - Rossella Villa
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico Ⅱ", Via S. Pansini 5, 80131-Naples, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Ugga
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico Ⅱ", Via S. Pansini 5, 80131-Naples, Italy
| | - Valeria Romeo
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico Ⅱ", Via S. Pansini 5, 80131-Naples, Italy
| | - Arnaldo Stanzione
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico Ⅱ", Via S. Pansini 5, 80131-Naples, Italy
| | - Renato Cuocolo
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico Ⅱ", Via S. Pansini 5, 80131-Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|