Prevalence, patterns of disease and outcome in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus who develop severe haematological problems

Haemolytic anaemia in a multi-ethnic cohort of lupus patients: a clinical and serological perspective

Systemic lupus erythematosus is a chronic autoimmune disease that can be associated with a variety of haematological manifestations. We identified 76 patients with haemolytic anaemia in a cohort of 1251 unrelated female lupus patients enrolled in our studies. The presence of the various American College of Rheumatology clinical criteria for lupus and serological specificities were determined in lupus patients with haemolytic anaemia and compared with a group of race-matched control lupus patients without haemolytic anaemia. Clinical data were obtained from medical records, and serological specificities were determined in our clinical immunology laboratory at OMRF. The presence of haemolytic anaemia in lupus patients was associated with a higher frequency of proteinuria (OR = 2.70, P = 0.000031), urinary cellular casts (OR = 2.83, P = 0.000062), seizures (OR = 2.96, P = 0.00024), pericarditis (OR = 2.21, P = 0.0019), pleuritis (OR = 1.72, P = 0.028) and lymphopenia (OR = 1.79, P = 0.015). These findings were independent of the presence of thrombocytopenia, which was approximately five times more common in lupus patients with haemolytic anaemia. Lupus patients with haemolytic anaemia were about 8 years younger than lupus patients without haemolytic anaemia at the time of disease onset (P = 0.000001). In the absence of thrombocytopenia, lupus patients with haemolytic anaemia were approximately two times more likely to have anti-dsDNA antibodies (P = 0.024). The presence of haemolytic anaemia is associated with a subset of lupus characterized by a younger age of disease onset, and a more severe disease with a higher likelihood of renal involvement, seizures, serositis and other cytopenias.

Features associated with, and the impact of, hemolytic anemia in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: LX, results from a multiethnic cohort

OBJECTIVE

To examine the clinical and genetic correlates of hemolytic anemia and its impact on damage accrual and mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients.

METHODS

SLE patients (American College of Rheumatology [ACR] criteria) of Hispanic (Texan or Puerto Rican), African American, and Caucasian ethnicity from the LUMINA (LUpus in MInorities, NAture versus nurture) cohort were studied. Hemolytic anemia was defined as anemia with reticulocytosis (ACR criterion). The association between degrees of hemolytic anemia and socioeconomic/demographic, clinical, pharmacologic, immunologic, psychological, and behavioral variables was examined by univariable and multivariable (proportional odds model) analyses. Genetic variables (FCGR and Fas/Fas ligand polymorphisms) were examined by 2 degrees of freedom test of association and Cochran-Armitage trend tests. The impact of hemolytic anemia on damage accrual and mortality was examined by multivariable linear and Cox regression analyses, respectively.

RESULTS

Of 628 patients studied, 90% were women, 19% were Texan Hispanic, 16% were Puerto Rican Hispanic, 37% were African American, and 28% were Caucasian. Sixty-five (10%) patients developed hemolytic anemia at some time during the disease course, 83% at or before diagnosis. Variables independently associated with degrees of hemolytic anemia were African American ethnicity, thrombocytopenia, and the use of azathioprine. Hemolytic anemia was associated with damage accrual after adjusting for variables known to affect this outcome; however, hemolytic anemia was not associated with mortality.

CONCLUSION

The association of hemolytic anemia with thrombocytopenia suggests a common mechanism in their pathophysiology. Hemolytic anemia is an early disease manifestation and is associated with African American ethnicity and the use of azathioprine; it appears to exert an impact on damage but not on mortality.

A case of Evans syndrome combined with systemic lupus erythematosus successfully treated with rituximab

Evans syndrome is a rare autoimmune disorder with unknown aetiology. Although corticosteroids and/or intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) are commonly used in its treatment, no standard strategy has been established. We report here a 44-year-old male with refractory Evans syndrome combined with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who responded well to rituximab. He was admitted to our hospital with severe bleeding caused by worsening of Evans syndrome. Despite treatment with a high-dose corticosteroid and IVIG, his thrombocytopaenia and haemolytic anaemia did not improve. We started rituximab at a dose of 375 mg/m(2) once a week for a total of two doses. There was significant improvement in his thrombocytopaenia and anaemia 1 month after administration of rituximab. Although the total immunoglobulin G (IgG) level did not change, the titres of platelet-associated IgG (PA-IgG) and of an indirect antiglobulin test (IAT) decreased under the treatment with rituximab. It is suggested that rituximab would be a powerful candidate in the treatment of refractory Evans syndrome by depleting abnormal clone-producing autoantibody.

[Autoimmune hemolytic anemia: diagnosis and management]

Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is diagnosed in the presence of anemia, usually macrocytic and of variable intensity, reticulocytosis, and a positive direct and/or indirect antiglobulin test, after ruling out other types of hemolytic anemia. A positive direct antiglobulin test alone is not sufficient to diagnose AIHA and may be positive in many patients without anemia or negative in some patients with AIHA. AIHA may be classified into two major categories according to the optimal temperature of antibody activity: warm-reacting autoantibodies (usually IgG) optimal around 37 degrees C and cold-reacting autoantibodies, optimal at 4 degrees C (usually IgM). This classification guides the selection of tests and treatment. AIHA is widely reported to be associated with a variety of other diseases, although these associations are often fortuitous. A minimal set of useful investigations is appropriate since AIHA may be secondary to viral infections, lymphoid malignancies, or autoimmune disorders such as lupus. Transfusion should remain rare in AHAI, but close contact with the transfusion service is necessary if it is to succeed. As for many autoimmune and/or systemic diseases, numerous types of treatment have been proposed but have not been validated in controlled multicenter studies. These are necessary to improve the management of these rare disorders.

Systemic lupus erythematosus in a multiethnic US cohort: XLIII. The significance of thrombocytopenia as a prognostic factor

OBJECTIVE

To examine the clinical correlates of thrombocytopenia and the value of thrombocytopenia as a predictor of disease activity, damage accrual, and mortality in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

SLE patients participating in a longitudinal multiethnic cohort were studied. Thrombocytopenia was defined as a platelet count <100,000/mm(3) at or before enrollment (baseline). Patients were categorized by the presence and absence of thrombocytopenia. The impact of thrombocytopenia as well as severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count <50,000/mm(3)) on disease activity, damage accrual, and mortality was examined by multivariable analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 616 patients were studied; 121 of the patients (20%) had thrombocytopenia, of whom 30 had severe thrombocytopenia. By univariable analyses, those with thrombocytopenia had more pulmonary, neurologic, renal, and hematologic involvement, worse disease activity and damage, and higher mortality rates. By multivariable analyses, thrombocytopenia was associated with higher disease activity over the disease course (P = 0.018), but not with the accrual of damage either at baseline (P = 0.543) or at the last visit (P = 0.086); however, severe thrombocytopenia was associated with damage accrual at the last visit (P = 0.020). When poverty was not included in the models, thrombocytopenia (<100,000/mm(3) or <50,000/mm(3)) was strongly associated with mortality (P < 0.001 for each comparison); however, the level of significance decreased some when poverty was included in the models.

CONCLUSION

Thrombocytopenia early in the course of SLE is indicative of more severe and active disease. Severe thrombocytopenia is an independent predictor of damage accrual at the last visit. Thrombocytopenia is also an independent predictor of mortality, albeit of a lesser magnitude than that predicted by poverty. Patients with thrombocytopenia need close monitoring for possible undesirable outcomes.

Treatment of isolated severe immune hemolytic anaemia associated with systemic lupus erythematosus: 26 cases

The aim of this study was to evaluate the response to treatment and the long-term outcome in a cohort of patients in whom severe autoimmune hemolytic anaemia (AHA) was the leading manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Twenty-six women with severe isolated AHA were included. Corticosteroids were used as the initial treatment for all patients in our study. An initial response was obtained in all but one patient (96%). The overall recurrence rate was three per 100 person-years, with an expected recurrence-free proportion of 73% with a 180 months median follow-up. Seven patients (27%) experienced a relapse of AHA. We found a higher proportion of pleuritis in relapsing patients. Only three patients experienced multiple relapses despite splenectomy and several immunosuppressants. Steroid-sparing effect of hydroxychloroquine and azathioprine could not be assessed because most of the patients received these treatments for other reasons than AHA. Intravenous immunoglobulins induced transient response in three cases. Splenectomy was efficient to definitively control AHA in one patient but two patients quickly experienced relapses while one patient did not benefit. Five patients received immunosuppressants that induced only transient responses. Rituximab was long-term efficient in one case. In conclusion, severe AHA is a serious complication of SLE that warrants appropriate management. On the basis of our experience, the ideal treatment of isolated AHA should be oral corticosteroids in first-line treatment. Our study does not support an important role for splenectomy. Patients refractory to conventional therapy should be treated either with few toxic immunosuppressive drugs, danazol or rituximab.

Systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a clinically heterogeneous disease, which is autoimmune in origin and is characterized by the presence of autoantibodies directed against nuclear antigens. It is a multi-system disease, and patients can present in vastly different ways. Prevalence varies with ethnicity, but is estimated to be about 1 per 1000 overall with a female to male ratio of 10:1. The clinical heterogeneity of this disease mirrors its complex aetiopathogenesis, which highlights the importance of genetic factors and individual susceptibility to environmental factors. SLE can affect every organ in the body. The most common manifestations include rash, arthritis and fatigue. At the more severe end of the spectrum, SLE can cause nephritis, neurological problems, anaemia and thrombocytopaenia. Over 90% of patients with SLE have positive anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA). Significant titres are accepted to be of 1:80 or greater. SLE is a relapsing and remitting disease, and treatment aims are threefold: managing acute periods of potentially life-threatening ill health, minimizing the risk of flares during periods of relative stability, and controlling the less life-threatening, but often incapacitating day to day symptoms. Hydroxychloroquine and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are used for milder disease; corticosteroids and immunosuppressive therapies are generally reserved for major organ involvement; anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody is now used in patients with severe disease who has not responded to conventional treatments. Despite enormous improvements in prognosis since the introduction of corticosteroids and immunosuppressive drugs, SLE continues to have a significant impact on the mortality and morbidity of those affected.

Clinical and prognostic value of autoantibodies in puerto Ricans with systemic lupus erythematosus

The aim of this study was to determine the association between lupus autoantibodies and the clinical manifestations and outcome in a cohort of Puerto Ricans patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). All patients fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for SLE. Demographic parameters, clinical manifestations over time and damage accrual were obtained at the last study visit. Disease damage was assessed with the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Damage Index (SDI). ANA, ANA pattern, and anti-dsDNA, anti-Smith, anti-Ro (SSA), anti-La (SSB) and anti-snRNP antibodies were measured at the time of SLE diagnosis. Chi-square test, Fisher exact test, ANOVA, logistic regression and general lineal model analyses were used to evaluate these associations. Ninety-six percent of patients were females. The cohort had a mean age of 40.2 +/- 12.0 years and mean disease duration of 9.6 +/- 7.0 years. Patients with elevated anti-dsDNA antibodies were more likely to have vasculitis, pericardial effusion, renal involvement, anaemia, leukopenia, lymphopenia and thrombocytopenia. Anti-Smith antibodies were positively associated with skin ulcerations, elevated liver enzymes, renal involvement and thrombocytopenia. Anti-Ro antibodies were related with the presence of discoid lupus, serositis, pneumonitis, elevated liver enzymes, hemolytic anaemia, leukopenia and lymphopenia. No positive associations were found for anti-snRNP or anti-La antibodies. The presence of anti-dsDNA, anti-Smith and anti-Ro antibodies was associated with higher SDI scores. In conclusion, anti-dsDNA, anti-Smith and anti-Ro antibodies are associated with several clinical manifestations and more damage accrual in Puerto Ricans with SLE. These findings provide valuable clinical and prognostic information for this ethnic population.

Anaemia in systemic lupus erythematosus: from pathophysiology to clinical assessment

Haematological abnormalities are common in systemic lupus erythematosus. Anaemia is found in about 50% of patients, with anaemia of chronic disease being the most common form. Impaired erythropoietin response and presence of antibodies against erythropoietin may contribute to the pathogenesis of this type of anaemia. Patients with autoimmune haemolytic anaemia usually belong to a distinct category, which is associated with anticardiolipin antibodies, thrombosis, thrombocytopenia, and renal disease, often in the context of secondary antiphospholipid syndrome. Autoantibodies, T lymphocytes, and deregulation of the cytokine network can affect bone marrow erythropoiesis, leading to anaemia.

[Rheumatic and hemato-/oncological disorders]

The association of rheumatic diseases with common and some of the less common hematological features such as different forms of anemia, leukopenia and thrombopenia are described in this article. In addition, the occurrence of malignancy in rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, myositis and scleroderma and possible causes are discussed. On the other hand, this review also focuses on various rheumatological manifestations of hematological diseases such as leukemia and lymphoma. The aim of the article is to give an overview of the various associations between rheumatological and hemato-/oncological diseases that have to be considered in clinical practice.

Review of ACR hematologic criteria in systemic lupus erythematosus

We have conducted a thorough literature review to evaluate the relative value of the hematologic criterion in making a diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), its clinical relevance, and its prognostic significance. In the updated 1982 ACR criteria, the presence of one or more of the four elements: 1) hemolytic anemia (with reticulocytosis); 2) leukopenia (<4000/microL on two or more occasions); 3) lymphopenia (< 1500/microL on two or more occasions); or 4) thrombocytopenia (< 100,000/microL in the absence of offending drugs) is now considered as a single hematologic disorder. The sensitivity and specificity of the individual elements of the hematologic criterion range from 18 to 46% and 89 to 99%, respectively. The accuracy of the hematologic criterion requires proper interpretation. For example, many studies reported the presence of anemia that was not clearly defined and likely included anemia from etiologies other than hemolytic anemia, thereby causing an overestimation of the prevalence. In addition, medications such as corticosteroids and cytotoxic agents, and viral infections, can also contribute to a reduction in lymphocyte count. Despite these limitations, the SLICC committee recommends no change in the elements of the hematologic criterion when this criterion is properly interpreted and other causes of cytopenia are excluded.