Long-term efficacy and safety of etanercept after readministration in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis

The use of low-dose etanercept as an alternative therapy for treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: a case series

During recent decades, biological medications play a crucial role for treating rheumatologic disorders and thus are strongly recommended for initial treatment of ankylosing spondylitis. However, because of high cost of biological drugs, the use of these drugs has been limited. In current series, we tried to assess safety of low-dose etanercept as a common usable biological drug in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. In a case-series study, 4 men with ankylosing spondylitis were treated with low-dose etanercept (25 mg/2 weeks) plus methotrexate (10 mg/week). Safety was assessed by measuring rate of differences in severity of clinical manifestations and level of C-reactive protein (CRP). After the completion of treatment with low-dose etanercept, inflammatory low back pain and morning stiffness was reduced lower than 30 min in all patients. Only one patient had baseline high serum ESR and positive CRP that was changed to negative following treatment protocol. At one-year follow-up, all participants continued their regular treatment regimen with the etanercept survival rate 100%. Neither side effects related to drug nor clinical complications were observed within the follow-up period. Our findings suggest that low-dose etanercept (25 mg/2 weeks) has an acceptable safety and effectiveness profile in individuals with ankylosing spondylitis and can be good alternative instead of conventional therapy with etanercept (25 mg two times per week).

Adverse effects of biologics: a network meta-analysis and Cochrane overview

BACKGROUND

Biologics are used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and many other conditions. While the efficacy of biologics has been established, there is uncertainty regarding the adverse effects of this treatment. Since serious risks such as tuberculosis (TB) reactivation, serious infections, and lymphomas may be common to the biologics but occur in small numbers across the various indications, we planned to combine the results from biologics used in many conditions to obtain the much needed risk estimates.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the adverse effects of tumor necrosis factor blocker (etanercept, adalimumab, infliximab, golimumab, certolizumab), interleukin (IL)-1 antagonist (anakinra), IL-6 antagonist (tocilizumab), anti-CD28 (abatacept), and anti-B cell (rituximab) therapy in patients with any disease condition except human immunodeficiency disease (HIV/AIDS).

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), controlled clinical trials (CCTs) and open-label extension (OLE) studies that studied one of the nine biologics for use in any indication (with the exception of HIV/AIDS) and that reported our pre-specified adverse outcomes were considered for inclusion. We searched The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and EMBASE (to January 2010). Identifying search results and data extraction were performed independently and in duplicate. For the network meta-analysis, we performed mixed-effects logistic regression using an arm-based, random-effects model within an empirical Bayes framework.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 163 RCTs with 50,010 participants and 46 extension studies with 11,954 participants. The median duration of RCTs was six months and 13 months for OLEs. Data were limited for tuberculosis (TB) reactivation, lymphoma, and congestive heart failure. Adjusted for dose, biologics as a group were associated with a statistically significant higher rate of total adverse events (odds ratio (OR) 1.19, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.30; number needed to treat to harm (NNTH) = 30, 95% CI 21 to 60) and withdrawals due to adverse events (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.64; NNTH = 37, 95% CI 19 to 190) and an increased risk of TB reactivation (OR 4.68, 95% CI 1.18 to 18.60; NNTH = 681, 95% CI 143 to 14706) compared to control.The rate of serious adverse events, serious infections, lymphoma, and congestive heart failure were not statistically significantly different between biologics and control treatment. Certolizumab pegol was associated with significantly higher risk of serious infections compared to control treatment (OR 3.51, 95% CI 1.59 to 7.79; NNTH = 17, 95% CI 7 to 68). Infliximab was associated with significantly higher risk of withdrawals due to adverse events compared to control (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.43 to 2.91; NNTH = 12, 95% CI 8 to 28). Indirect comparisons revealed that abatacept and anakinra were associated with a significantly lower risk of serious adverse events compared to most other biologics.  Although the overall numbers are relatively small, certolizumab pegol was associated with significantly higher odds of serious infections compared to etanercept, adalimumab, abatacept, anakinra, golimumab, infliximab, and rituximab; abatacept was significantly less likely than infliximab and tocilizumab to be associated with serious infections.  Abatacept, adalimumab, etanercept and golimumab were significantly less likely than infliximab to result in withdrawals due to adverse events.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Overall, in the short term biologics were associated with significantly higher rates of total adverse events, withdrawals due to adverse events and TB reactivation. Some biologics had a statistically higher association with certain adverse outcomes compared to control, but there was no consistency across the outcomes so caution is needed in interpreting these results.There is an urgent need for more research regarding the long-term safety of biologics and the comparative safety of different biologics. National and international registries and other types of large databases are relevant sources for providing complementary evidence regarding the short- and longer-term safety of biologics. 

Spondyloarthritides: evolving therapies

TNF blockade therapy has substantially advanced the treatment of peripheral spondyloarthritides but revolutionised the treatment of severe ankylosing spondylitis. The capacity of biologic treatment to improve dramatically symptoms and quality of life in patients with spinal disease is undoubted, although important questions remain. Notable amongst these are concerns about skeletal disease modification and the true balance between costs and effectiveness. Guidelines for the biologic treatment of ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis have been introduced in North America and Europe with considerable consensus. However, the absence of clear criteria for the diagnosis of early disease leaves the issue of biologic treatment of ankylosing spondylitis at the pre-radiographic stage unresolved. Newer biologic agents are entering the field, although superiority over TNF blockers will be difficult to demonstrate.

Population pharmacokinetics of rhTNFR-Fc in healthy Chinese volunteers and in Chinese patients with Ankylosing spondylitis

AIM

To investigate the population pharmacokinetics of recombinant human tumor necrosis factor receptor-Fc fusion protein (rhTNFR-Fc) administered via subcutaneous (SC) injection in healthy Chinese volunteers and in Chinese patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

METHODS

Thirty-two healthy volunteers were randomly assigned to receive a single SC injection of 12.5, 25, 37.5, or 50 mg of rhTNFR-Fc. Twenty male patients with moderate AS were randomly assigned to receive seven consecutive SC injections of rhTNFR-Fc at either 25 mg twice a week (BIW) or 50 mg once a week (QW). Population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis was applied to obtain PK parameters of rhTNFR-Fc by the NONMEM method.

RESULTS

The data were best described by a one-compartment model with lag time. We found that gender had a significant effect on the apparent clearance (CL/F), with the male CL/F ratio being only 0.665 times the female ratio; the absorption coefficient (F) of multiple dosages of rhTNFR-Fc was only 0.674 times that of a single dosage. The outcome parameters were CL/F (female: 0.168 L/h, male: 0.110 L/h), the apparent volume of distribution (Vd/F: 15.5 L), the absorption rate constant (Ka) (single dosage: 0.0605 h⁻¹, multiple dosage: 0.0408 h⁻¹), and the lag time (T(lag): 1.03 h). The inter-individual variability in the CL/F, Vd/F, Ka, and T(lag) were 33.3%, 42.7%, 55.6%, and 81.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Chinese females have a higher CL/F than Chinese males, and multiple dosings can significantly decrease the absorption of rhTNFR-Fc (SC). The population PK parameters of rhTNFR-Fc in healthy Chinese volunteers and patients with AS were similar to those reported for subjects in published American studies.

Editorial review: how early should ankylosing spondylitis be treated with a tumor necrosis factor-blocker?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Therapy of ankylosing spondylitis with tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-blockers is very effective in about 50% of patients. The focus of this review is to discuss how early in the course of the disease patients with axial spondyloarthritis should be treated with TNF-blockers.

RECENT FINDINGS

During the last 10 years TNF-blockers were investigated in established ankylosing spondylitis. More recently clinical trials focused on early treatment including patients with axial nonradiographic spondyloarthritis. It could be shown that TNF-blockers are at least as effective in patients with axial nonradiographic spondyloarthritis when compared with established ankylosing spondylitis and that TNF-blockers are even more effective when used earlier in the course of the disease and in younger age. Some data even indicate that drug-free remission might be achieved if patients are treated earlier. Active inflammation as seen by MRI can effectively be suppressed during therapy with TNF-blockers. It has been hypothesized that early anti-inflammatory treatment is the best way to prevent ankylosis, which has to be proven in future studies.

SUMMARY

TNF-blockers can achieve a higher clinical response if ankylosing spondylitis patients and patients with nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis are treated earlier. Whether very early treatment affects ankylosis has to be further investigated.

Better short-term clinical response to etanercept in Chinese than Caucasian patients with active ankylosing spondylitis

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors including etanercept have been demonstrated to be very effective in severe ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in Caucasian patients. However, clinical efficacy of etanercept to treat active AS in Chinese patients has not been reported. In this study, a prospective, open-label trial of etanercept (25 mg BIW), involving 46 AS patients from 16 medical centers of Taiwan, was conducted. Questionnaire was utilized to record demographic data and clinical parameters, including Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), Bath AS Functional Index (BASFI), Bath AS Global Index (BASGI), Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 20, 50, and 70, and others, before and at different time intervals after etanercept treatment. Laboratory tests including blood chemistry, hematology, urine analysis, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) were done at baseline and at weeks 4, 8, and 12. In this 12-week study, etanercept demonstrated rapid and significant improvement in the ASAS20 response criteria (91.3%), at as early as 2 weeks of therapy (71.3%). Partial remission of AS was achieved in 49.3% of patients after 12 weeks of treatment. Disease activity (BASDAI) and function (BASFI) were also significantly improved after 12 weeks etanercept treatment (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0001, respectively). In addition, significant increase of chest expansion (2.77 ± 1.69 cm versus 3.56 ± 1.82 cm, p = 0.0004) and lumbar flexion (2.11 ± 2.76 cm versus 2.58 ± 3.42 cm, p = 0.0075) and significant reduction of occiput-to-wall distance (6.59 ± 7.14 cm versus 5.32 ± 6.65 cm, p = 0.0006) were also demonstrated. Both ESR and CRP declined significantly after patients were treated with etanercept. There were no severe adverse effects during the treatment period. Etanercept is generally safe, well tolerated, and effective in Chinese patients with severe AS. Clinical efficacy, including partial remission and BASDAI, is even better in Chinese than in Caucasian patients. Further study is required to assess long-term efficacy and safety in Chinese patients with AS.

[Anti-TNFα therapy in ankylosing spondylitis: symptom control and structural damage modification]

Anti-TNFα agents represent an outstanding advance in the symptomatic control of patients with ankylosing spondylitis presenting an inadequate response to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Anti-TNFα antagonists have demonstrated efficacy and safety in the long-term but continuous therapy is needed for an adequate control of symptoms. After the failure to a first anti-TNFα agent, the use of a second TNFα antagonist seems to be effective and safe. Despite the fast and continuous suppression of bone inflammation, demonstrated by magnetic resonance imaging, the beneficial effect of treatment with TNFα antagonists on the radiological evolution has not been demonstrated to date in ankylosing spondylitis. It seems that insights into new therapeutic molecular targets implicated in the process of ossification are needed.

[Management of the patient with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in partial remission with biologic therapy: is it possible to suspend treatment?]

The management of patients with AS and a good clinical response to biologic therapy is controversial. The results of the different published papers suggest that the suspension of treatment is not a good therapeutic option in these patients. There is currently no validated definition for clinical remission in patients with AS. A hypothetical definition should include the absence of signs and symptoms of disease in any localization, associated to the lack of progression of the disease and all of this during a period of time long enough to establish its persistence with time. In our experience, those patients presenting an apparent clinical remission, based on the previously established definition, could be considered for temporary treatment suspension, especially if we take into account that the reintroduction of treatment is safe and effective.

Multicenter validation of the value of BASFI and BASDAI in Chinese ankylosing spondylitis and undifferentiated spondyloarthropathy patients

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the reliability of Bath ankylosing spondylitis functional index (BASFI) and Bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index (BASDAI) in Chinese ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and undifferentiated spondyloarthropathy (USpA) patients. 664 AS patients by the revised New York criteria for AS and 252 USpA patients by the European Spondyloarthropathy Study Group criteria were enrolled. BASDAI and BASFI questionnaires were translated into Chinese. Participants were required to fill in BASFI and BASDAI questionnaires again after 24 h. Moreover, BASDAI and BASFI were compared in AS patients receiving Enbrel or infliximab before and after treatment. For AS group, BASDAI ICC: 0.9502 (95% CI: 0.9330–0.9502, α = 0.9702), BASFI ICC: 0.9587 (95% CI: 0.9521–0.9645, α = 0.9789). For USpA group, BASDAI ICC: 0.9530 (95% CI: 0.9402–0.9632, α = 0.9760), BASFI ICC: 0.9900 (95% CI: 0.9871–0.9922, α = 0.9950). In the AS group, disease duration, occipital wall distance, modified Schober test, chest expansion, ESR, and CRP showed significant correlation with BASDAI and BASFI (all P < 0.01). In the USpA group, onset age, ESR, and CRP were significantly correlated with BASDAI (all P < 0.05), while modified Schober test, ESR, and CRP were significantly associated with BASFI (all P < 0.05). The change in BASDAI and BASFI via Enbrel or infliximab treatment showed a significant positive correlation (P < 0.01). The two instruments have good reliability and reference value regarding the evaluation of patient’s condition and anti-TNF-α treatment response.

Bioboosters in the treatment of rheumatic diseases: a comprehensive review of currently available biologics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis

Immunologic research has clarified many aspects of the pathogenesis of inflammatory rheumatic disorders. Biologic drugs acting on different steps of the immune response, including cytokines, B- and T-cell lymphocytes, have been marketed over the past 10 years for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of anti-cytokine agents in RA (including the anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) drugs infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, golimumab, certolizumab, anti-interleukin (IL)-1 anakinra, and anti-IL-6 tocilizumab) demonstrated a significant efficacy compared to traditional therapies, if combined with methotrexate (MTX), as measured by ACR 20, 50 and 70 response criteria. The new therapies have also been demonstrated to be superior to MTX in slowing or halting articular damage. RCTs have shown the efficacy of anti-TNFα in AS patients through significant improvement of symptoms and function. Trials of anti-TNFα in PsA patients showed marked improvement of articular symptoms for psoriasis and radiological disease progression. More recent studies have demonstrated the efficacy of B-cell depletion with rituximab, and T-cell inactivation with abatacept. All these drugs have a satisfactory safety profile. This paper reviews the different aspects of efficacy and tolerability of biologics in the therapy of RA, AS, and PsA.

A 2-year comparative open label randomized study of efficacy and safety of etanercept and infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis

The signs and symptoms of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) respond inadequately to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, corticosteroids, and disease modifying antirheumatic drugs in quite a number of patients. Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors have demonstrated to be of value in reducing AS disease activity in clinical trials. The efficacy and safety of both etanercept and infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis were compared in a 2-year open label randomised study. Our results are consistent with a significant more rapid clinical improvement in the infliximab treated group. Treatment with both etanercept and infliximab at the end of the study was effective, safe, and well tolerated.

Physical function, disease activity, and health-related quality-of-life outcomes after 3 years of adalimumab treatment in patients with ankylosing spondylitis

Introduction

We evaluated the three-year impact of adalimumab on patient-reported physical function and health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) outcomes in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

Methods

The Adalimumab Trial Evaluating Long-Term Efficacy and Safety in AS (ATLAS) is an ongoing five-year study that included an initial 24-week, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind period, followed by open-label extension treatment with adalimumab. Clinical and HRQOL data collected for up to three years from ATLAS were used for these analyses. Patients were randomized to receive adalimumab 40 mg or placebo by subcutaneous injection every other week. Physical function was assessed by the Bath AS Functional Index (BASFI), as well as by the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Physical Function subscale scores. HRQOL was assessed using the AS Quality of Life (ASQOL) questionnaire. Disease activity was assessed by the Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI).

Results

Of 315 patients enrolled in ATLAS, 288 (91%) participated in an open-label adalimumab treatment extension and 82% provided three-year outcome data. During the 24-week double-blind phase, adalimumab-treated patients experienced significant improvement compared with placebo-treated patients in the BASDAI (P < 0.001), BASFI (P < 0.001), ASQOL (P < 0.001), and both the SF-36 PCS (P < 0.001) and Physical Function subscale (P < 0.001) scores, but not the SF-36 Mental Component Summary score (P = 0.181) and Mental Health subscale scores (P = 0.551). Mean changes from baseline through three years of adalimumab treatment were statistically significant for the BASDAI (change score: -3.9, P < 0.001), BASFI (change score: -29.6, P < 0.001), SF-36 PCS (change score: 11.6, P < 0.001), and Physical Function (change score: 23.3, P < 0.001). Comparable results were observed for the other SF-36 scores and for the ASQOL (all P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Adalimumab significantly improved disease activity, patient-reported physical function, and HRQOL. These benefits were maintained over three years of treatment in patients with AS.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00085644.

A systematic MEDLINE analysis of therapeutic approaches in ankylosing spondylitis

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic inflammatory disorder involving the sacroiliac joints (SIJs), spine and less frequently the peripheral joints. Traditionally, it is well recognised that AS is a challenging disease to manage due to the lack of effective therapeutic options. Current evidence would suggest this has changed and there are now a number of therapies available that provide persistent control of inflammatory symptoms with improvement in daily function. NSAIDs remain the first step in patient treatment. Sulphasalazine may be effective in peripheral arthritis and there are emerging data to support its use in early inflammatory back pain. Studies have shown that pamidronate and steroid injection into SIJ have a symptom-modifying effect in AS. Current data suggest that anti-TNF treatment promises early benefit which is likely to continue in the longer term. Treatment with biologics should be considered sooner rather than later in the management of AS.

Inflammatory arthritis: an overview for primary care physicians

Continuing advances in the treatment of inflammatory arthritides such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) have made remission a realistic goal for patients. Despite these advances, early diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis by primary care physicians (PCPs) and subsequent referral to a rheumatologist remain a challenge. Delayed diagnosis and referral, which may extend to several years in some cases, may lead to irreversible joint destruction and compromised function. The aim of this review is to aid PCPs in preventing the potential delay in disease recognition and patient referral by highlighting the currently accepted criteria for disease activity, clinical response, and remission of RA, AS, and PsA. In addition, a discussion of the benefits and risks of the currently approved traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and biologic treatments, and the importance of comanagement of these conditions across specialties, will be addressed. Because PCPs are often the first point of contact for disease recognition, they can play a critical role in the management of these patients.

Safety and clinical responses in ankylosing spondylitis after three months of etanercept therapy

We aimed to evaluate the safety and clinical responses in Korean ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients after three months of etanercept therapy. AS patients satisfying the Modified New York Criteria were enrolled. They were assessed for safety and clinical responses at enrollment and after three months of etanercept therapy. A total of 124 patients completed the study. After three months, the rate of ASsessment in AS International Working Group 20% improvement (ASAS 20) response was 79.8%. The rates of ASAS 40 and ASAS 5/6 responses were 58.5 and 62.8%, respectively. Significant improvement of Korean version of Bath AS Disease Activity Index (KBASDAI) (p<0.0001), Bath AS Functional Activity Index (BASFI) (p<0.0001), and Bath AS Metrology Index (BASMI) (p=0.0009) were achieved after three months. Quality of life was also significantly improved after three months, as demonstrated by scores for SF-36 (p<0.0001) and EQ-5D (p<0.0001). Erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein were significantly decreased (p<0.0001, p<0.0001, respectively). None of the patients developed tuberculosis and there were no serious adverse event. AS patients with inadequate response to conventional therapy showed significant clinical improvement without serious adverse events after three months of etanercept therapy.

Emergence of Crohn's disease during treatment with the anti-tumor necrosis factor agent etanercept for ankylosing spondylitis: possible mechanisms of action

OBJECTIVES

To report on the clinical evolution of a patient with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) treated with etanercept who subsequently developed Crohn's disease, to review the literature for similar cases, and to discuss possible mechanisms responsible for these observations.

METHODS

We describe the medical history, diagnostic tests, and disease progression of a 26-year-old man with AS who developed the clinical manifestations of Crohn's disease after 16 months of successful treatment of his rheumatologic symptoms with etanercept. A Medline search, as well as cases presented in abstract form at European Leaque Against Rheumatism (EULAR) and American College of Rheumotology (ACR) meetings, describing emergent bowel symptoms in patients treated with etanercept was undertaken.

RESULTS

Eight other cases were identified, with gastrointestinal symptoms appearing after a few weeks to several years, while receiving etanercept treatment. These observations raise the possibility that etanercept unmasks inflammatory bowel disease in patients with AS whose gastrointestinal symptoms were silent.

CONCLUSION

The reactivation or the unmasking of gastrointestinal symptoms during etanercept treatment raises the issue of differences between etanercept and the other antitumor necrosis factor monoclonal antibodies in their molecular structure, tumor necrosis factor neutralizing effect, mode of administration, and pharmacokinetics that may account for these observations.

Update on the use of etanercept across a spectrum of rheumatoid disorders

Etanercept is a soluble TNF receptor p75 fusion protein which is approved for subcutaneous use (50 mg weekly) in the treatment of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA), juvenile RA, ankylosing spondylitis, and psoriatic arthritis. Etanercept binds to both TNFα and lymphotoxin and has quite a short mean half-life (70 hours). Numerous randomized clinical trials have demonstrated its efficacy to improve signs and symptoms in early and established RA and other inflammatory arthritis. Furthermore, etanercept has shown its ability to prevent radiographic progression and to improve health-related quality of life in patients with RA and psoriatic arthritis. A combination of etanercept plus methotrexate was more efficacious than etanercept monotherapy in RA patients but there is currently no evidence that such rheumatic combination is better than monotherapy in other disorders. Etanercept was generally well tolerated both in controlled trials with withdrawal rates being similar to the comparator groups and in large observational studies. Infections and injection-site reactions were the most frequently reported events. Serious infections were slightly increased but the occurrence of tuberculosis seemed less frequent than with anti-TNF monoclonal antibodies (infliximab and adalimumab). The benefit-risk ratio of etanercept appeared to be very positive, and this drug has now emerged as a major therapy in patients with active inflammatory arthritis. Furthermore, it is more frequently considered as an emerging and valuable option in patients with early disease.

Etanercept: a review of its use in the management of ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis

Etanercept (Enbrel), a recombinant, dimeric, soluble tumour necrosis factor (TNF) receptor protein, is approved in various countries for the treatment of adult patients with ankylosing spondylitis or psoriatic arthritis. Monotherapy with subcutaneous etanercept 25mg twice weekly or 50mg once weekly was effective and generally well tolerated in patients with ankylosing spondylitis or psoriatic arthritis participating in several large, well designed clinical studies. Treatment with etanercept was more effective than placebo in reducing disease activity and improving health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) in both patient populations, and in delaying structural disease progression in patients with psoriatic arthritis. The beneficial response to etanercept achieved with shorter-term treatment was sustained in studies of up to 4 years' total duration. Randomised, well designed, head-to-head comparisons, including pharmacoeconomic analyses, with other anti-TNF biological modulators are required to accurately position etanercept and fully establish its cost effectiveness. In the meantime, etanercept is a valuable treatment option for patients with ankylosing spondylitis or psoriatic arthritis who are suitable candidates for therapy.

Differences in the incidence of flares or new onset of inflammatory bowel diseases in patients with ankylosing spondylitis exposed to therapy with anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha agents

OBJECTIVE

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are clinically and pathologically linked. Anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents are efficacious in treating AS, but not all are equally effective in treating IBD (Crohn's disease [CD] and ulcerative colitis [UC]). The purpose our study was to analyze the incidence of flares and new onset of IBD in patients with AS treated with anti-TNF agents.

METHODS

Data from 9 trials, 7 placebo-controlled trials and 2 open studies, were analyzed.

RESULTS

Data were available on 419 AS patients exposed to etanercept (625 patient-years), 366 exposed to infliximab (618 patient-years), 295 exposed to adalimumab (132 patient-years), and 434 placebo patients (150 patient-years). A history of IBD was reported in 76 of 1,130 patients (6.7%). There were 2 reports of IBD while receiving placebo (1.3 per 100 patient-years), 1 while receiving infliximab, and 3 while receiving adalimumab. Among the 14 IBD cases receiving etanercept (2.2 per 100 patient-years) there were 8 CD and 6 UC cases, significantly different from infliximab (P = 0.01) but not from placebo. Patients with a history of IBD had an IBD flare odds ratio of 18.0 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 2-154) while taking etanercept and 4.2 (95% CI 0.4-44) while taking adalimumab, in comparison with infliximab. The incidence rates of new onset of IBD showed no significant difference between etanercept (0.8 per 100 patient-years) and placebo (0.5 per 100 patient-years).

CONCLUSION

New onset and flare of IBD are infrequent events in AS patients receiving anti-TNF therapy. Infliximab (but not etanercept) largely prevents IBD activity. More data are required for adalimumab. The incidence of new onset of IBD was statistically not different from placebo for all anti-TNF agents.

New therapeutic approaches for spondyloarthritis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Tumor necrosis factor alpha antagonists are effective for signs and symptoms of ankylosing spondylitis. Recent studies have evaluated the efficacy of these agents for structural disease modification. We critically review recent radiographic data suggesting that tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibition may have structure-modifying effects in ankylosing spondylitis, and may thereby alter the disease course.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies employing MRI suggest that therapy with tumor necrosis factor alpha antagonists significantly reduces spinal inflammation in active ankylosing spondylitis when compared to placebo; there was no comparable improvement in the severity of chronic stigmata, such as syndesmyophytes and vertebral bridging. These studies were of relatively short duration and small size.

SUMMARY

Despite insufficient evidence to conclude definitively that tumor necrosis factor alpha-antagonist therapy provides durable and effective structure modification in ankylosing spondylitis, the data strongly suggest a benefit, at least in the short term. In the future, MRI data coupled with clinical outcomes in larger cohorts followed for longer durations may result in a paradigm shift for ankylosing spondylitis treatment similar to that undergone for rheumatoid arthritis, where patients with ankylosing spondylitis are offered therapy early in the disease course to arrest and prevent structural disease progression.

Ankylosing spondylitis

Ankylosing spondylitis is a common inflammatory rheumatic disease that affects the axial skeleton, causing characteristic inflammatory back pain, which can lead to structural and functional impairments and a decrease in quality of life. New imaging techniques and therapies have substantially changed the management of this disease in the past decade. Whether inhibition of radiographic progression and structural damage can be reached with available drugs is as yet unclear. Furthermore, treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents and physiotherapy remains an important approach to long-term management of patients with ankylosing spondylitis. The new treatment options with tumour necrosis factor blockers seems a breakthrough for patients refractory to conventional treatment.

Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Contemporary Perspective on Diagnosis and Treatment

OBJECTIVES

In recent years, great progress has been made in the development of diagnostic tools, therapeutic approaches, and validated outcome measures in the understanding of the pathogenesis of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). The purpose of this review was to summarize these developments.

METHODS

We performed a PubMed search for the period 1978 to 2005, using the keyword, "ankylosing spondylitis," resulting in a total of 4878 publications, including 778 reviews. Articles were then selected based on their discussion of recent diagnostic tools and new treatment approaches in the pathogenesis of AS, leading to a final total of 104 articles.

RESULTS

In recent years, there have been 2 major developments in the management of AS that make earlier diagnosis possible and offer the hope of alleviating pain and preventing structural changes that result in loss of function. These developments include the use of magnetic resonance imaging to visualize the inflammatory changes in the sacroiliac joint and the axial spine, and the demonstration that tumor necrosis factor blocking agents are highly efficacious in reducing spinal inflammation and possibly in slowing radiographic progression.

CONCLUSIONS

There have been major advances in both the diagnostic tools and the therapeutic regimens available for patients with AS.

Update on anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy in the spondyloarthropathies including psoriatic arthritis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The introduction of the macromolecule tumor necrosis factor inhibitors etanercept, infliximab, and adalimumab has proven very successful for patients with spondyloarthropathies. The greatest experience has accrued in ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis. This paper reviews data from clinical trials with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Treatment with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors has not only resulted in substantial improvement in the signs and symptoms of arthritis but has also improved functional status and quality of life in ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis. Improvements in associated inflammatory features, such as enthesitis in psoriatic arthritis and uveitis in ankylosing spondylitis, have also been observed. Moreover, treatment has been shown to inhibit the progression of radiographic joint damage in psoriatic arthritis and to attenuate spinal inflammation in ankylosing spondylitis. The notable success of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors has not only changed the treatment paradigms for these conditions but has also stimulated studies aimed at improving diagnosis, prognostic stratification, and other aspects of clinical care.

SUMMARY

The introduction of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors for patients with ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis has had a tremendous impact on daily clinical care.

Ankylosing spondylitis and bowel disease

Between 5 and 10% of cases of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) are associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), either Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis. A much larger percentage of AS patients have subclinical gut inflammation manifested either by endoscopic findings or by histology. The association with HLA-B27 is less strong in IBD-associated AS than in idiopathic AS, and there is evidence for an association between gut inflammation in AS with the Crohn's-disease-related CARD15 mutations. Despite the different genetics, the immunopathology suggests common inflammatory pathways in gut and joint inflammation in AS, and in gut inflammation in AS and IBD. Although this observation is of interest to unravel the pathophysiology of the disease, systematic screening of AS patients by ileocolonoscopy is not indicated in the absence of gut symptomatology as only a small proportion of AS patients with subclinical gut inflammation will develop overt IBD over time. Treatment of AS associated with IBD with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is problematic because of concerns of potential re-activation of IBD by NSAIDs. Major advances have been made in recent years with the establishment of anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) therapy in AS, the other spondyloarthritides and IBD. Anti-TNF agents are of particular relevance to AS patients with concomitant IBD who are at risk of exacerbation of the underlying bowel disease when treated with NSAIDs. In IBD, infliximab, unlike etanercept, is effective in treating clinical symptoms, inducing and maintaining remission, and mucosal healing. Adalimumab appears to be effective in treating both AS and IBD; however, official approval is pending. Currently, infliximab is the drug of choice for the treatment of patients with active AS associated with IBD.

Ankylosing spondylitis: new treatment modalities

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic and progressive inflammatory arthropathy that affects young adults. It is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, and can have a devastating effect on quality of life. Conventional therapeutic regimes have traditionally been insufficient to control symptoms and signs of disease, and have failed to halt disease progression. However, the outlook of AS has changed with the advent of biological agents that block pivotal inflammatory cytokines, such as tumour necrosis factor-alpha. Ongoing research has proven these agents to be efficacious and safe in the short and medium term. Further, longer-term trials are awaited to address the issue of whether these therapies are true disease modifiers in AS.

Spondyloarthritiden

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is the major subtype and a major outcome of an interrelated group of rheumatic diseases now named as spondyloarthritides (SpA). The most important clinical features of this group are inflammatory back pain (IBP), asymmetric peripheral oligoarthritis, predominantly of the lower limbs, and enthesitis. Established classification criteria for AS and SpA are known to perform less well in early disease stages. This partly contributes to the delay in diagnosis, mainly due the high frequency of back pain in the population. The methods for making an early diagnosis have recently improved. The major factors involved in this improvement are HLA B27 and magnetic resonance imaging of the sacroiliac joints, but also of the spine. Conventional radiography, however, is still the gold standard. International recommendations for the management of AS have recently been published. Conventional medical treatment is based mainly on the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs); patients with peripheral arthritis may be treated with sulfasalazine. Patients with persistently active disease benefit from therapy with anti-TNF agents. Physiotherapy is of major importance in the general approach to patients with SpA, especially with AS.

The clinical application of etanercept in Chinese patients with rheumatic diseases

Over a 2-year period, to evaluate the efficacy and safety of biologic agents, etanercept (25 mg twice per week, s.c.) was used to treat 57 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, 9 ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients, 6 psoriatic arthritis (PSA) patients, and 4 juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA) patients. In addition to inflammatory arthritis, I have used this tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blocker in other rheumatic diseases including idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), Behçet's disease with intractable oral ulcer, fibromyalgia syndrome, and systemic lupus erythematosis with intractable pleural effusion and acute lumbar disc herniation. For RA, after 6 months of etanercept treatment, all the parameters including number of swollen joints, number of tender joints, disease activity score, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, and global health status were rapidly improved (P < 0.001 or P < 0.0001). The anticyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibody and rheumatoid factor also significantly declined. For spondyloarthropathy, it also gave a similar effect as to RA. Both Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index also improved. One of the two cases with Behçet's disease with intractable oral ulcer had a long-term remission after etanercept. The other Behçet's disease patient with oral ulcer and another with ITP obtained a good response temporarily. The short-term use of etanercept (<3 months) did not bring a significant effect for cases of fibromyalgia syndrome, pleural effusion, and lumbar disc herniation. In conclusion, a dramatic and rapid clinical response in different kinds of arthritis patients can be achieved by etanercept. Moreover, the TNF-alpha inhibitor also can treat other severe rheumatic-related symptoms. In general, except for a few cases with infection and two cases with malignancy, etanercept was safe in our arthritis patients. We need to study a larger number of patients in order to better understand the efficacy and safety of etanercept.

Developments and current pharmacotherapeutic recommendations for ankylosing spondylitis

The introduction of anti-TNFalpha therapy into the field of rheumatology has led to dramatic improvements in patient care, perhaps the most remarkable being in the management of ankylosing spondylitis. As experience with these compounds grows, their place in therapeutic strategy is becoming clearer, and it has been possible to develop evidence- and expertise-based recommendations for the management of ankylosing spondylitis to aid the clinician in patient care. This review outlines treatment advances in ankylosing spondylitis, including the use of anti-TNFalpha agents, and how these have been incorporated into clinical recommendations for daily use.

A survey of inclusion of the time element when reporting adverse effects in randomised controlled trials of cyclo-oxygenase-2 and tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibitors

BACKGROUND

The adequacy of reporting the time element in adverse effects in articles on randomised clinical trials of cyclo-oxygenase-2 and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)alpha antagonists was surveyed.

METHODS

Prominent rheumatology and general/internal medicine journals were searched for all randomised controlled trials published about cyclo-oxygenase-2 and TNFalpha inhibitor use in rheumatological diseases up to November 2005. Reporting of time to the occurrence of the adverse effects, the use of patient years as the time frame of the reported adverse effects and the use of annual standard incidence ratios based on the surveillance, epidemiology and end-results (SEER) programme when reporting neoplasms as potential adverse effects of TNFalpha antagonists were specifically tabulated.

RESULTS

Only 23 of 70 (33%) of all articles gave the specific time of onset of an adverse effect. Nine studies used patient years to report the adverse effects and six studies used annual standard incidence ratios, using SEER, as the comparator.

CONCLUSION

In reporting of adverse effects in randomised clinical trials, a particularly neglected issue is the reporting of the time dimension of adverse effects.

Newer Therapeutic Approaches: Spondyloarthritis and Uveitis

Over the last 5 years considerable progress has taken place in the therapeutic approach to spondyloarthritis (SpA). This progress is due in large part to the development of effective biologic therapies and to improved clinical trial design and implementation. This article summarizes treatment advances in SpA with emphasis on the efficacy and safety of biologic agents in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, undifferentiated spondyloarthropathy, and uveitis.

Continuation of treatment with infliximab in ankylosing spondylitis: 2-yr open follow-up

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the continuation and safety of treatment with infliximab in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) over a 2-yr period.

METHODS

This study was an open, observational, 2-yr extension study of an open-label study of three induction infusions of infliximab in refractory AS. The fourth infusion was performed only in case of relapse. Thereafter, infliximab was to be administered as needed according to the rheumatologist's opinion; however, for some patients, infusions were performed systematically.

RESULTS

None of the 50 recruited patients was lost to follow-up. Thirteen patients (26%) interrupted their treatment by infliximab: four for inefficacy, seven for adverse events, of which four were for allergic reactions to the infusion, and two for other reasons. For all of the 46 patients who had had three infusions judged efficacious and well tolerated, a fourth infusion was performed because of a flare of the disease, after a mean interval of 20.3+/-9.9 weeks (range 7.3-57.9). Over the 24 months, the mean interval between infusions was 11.6+/-9.0 weeks. This interval was longer when patients were treated only as needed (mean 14.3+/-12.1 weeks) than systematically (mean 9.8+/-5.7 weeks). Side-effects were similar to those noted in shorter-term studies; seven patients suffered serious adverse events. There were no deaths, no malignancies and no tuberculosis.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the long-term treatment continuation of infliximab in AS, and shows an acceptable safety profile. It appears that for some patients the disease can be controlled with long intervals between infusions; these findings warrant further studies.

Reliability and validity of the Italian version of the Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire in patients with musculoskeletal disorders

The aim of this study is to analyse the psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Chronic Pain Grade (CPG) questionnaire within a population of chronic musculoskeletal pain patients. The CPG questionnaire was adapted following the translation and back-translation methodologies. There were 576 patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Internal consistency was checked by the Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Construct validity was analysed by performing principal component factor analysis and by comparing CPG dimensions and subscales with the SF-36 questionnaire. Discriminant validity was assessed by comparing the CPG and SF-36 dimensions in patients with and without other health conditions. Factor analysis yielded two factors which accounted for 76.4% of the variance of the questionnaire. Both subscales of the CPG showed satisfying to good internal consistency. Cronbach's alpha was 0.89 for the first factor 'Disability Score' (58.72% of the explained variance) and 0.81 for the second factor 'Characteristic Pain Intensity' (17.70% of the explained variance). Item-total correlations for the subscales were moderate up to high (from 0.500 to 0.771). In comparison with the SF-36, the expected correlations were found when comparing items measuring similar constructs, supporting the concepts of convergent construct validity. Discriminant validity, assessed by comparing the CPG dimensions in patients with and without other health conditions, showed that the CPG shows moderate association with the presence of co-morbidities. Furthermore, the CPG Disability Score was inversely correlated (p=0.01) to years of formal education. In conclusion, the Italian version of the CPG questionnaire has shown to be valid and reliable for evaluating the severity of chronic musculoskeletal pain, with metric properties in agreement with the original, widely used version.

How early should ankylosing spondylitis be treated with tumour necrosis factor blockers?

Recognition and treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in the early stages of the disease has yet to be established. This paper considers the evidence available and the questions that need to be answered regarding the benefits of early diagnosis and treatment with tumour necrosis factor (TNF) blockers in AS. The authors conclude that AS can and has to be diagnosed earlier than is being done at present, before radiological changes are evident, and the potential of TNF blockers to induce long term remission if given early enough needs to be clarified.

Therapy of ankylosing spondylitis. Part II: biological therapies in the spondyloarthritides

Therapeutic options for patients with active and severe spondylarthritis (SpA) have been fairly limited in the past decades. There is now accumulating evidence that biological therapy with agents directed against tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) is highly efficacious in the spondyloarthritides, especially in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The TNF blocking agents currently available, infliximab (Remicade), etanercept (Enbrel), and adalimumab (Humira), are approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Europe and the USA. In contrast to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have limited efficacy in SpA. No DMARDs are available for AS patients with active spinal disease. Thus, for AS patients whose condition is not sufficiently controlled with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), therapy with TNF blockers may be considered as a first-line treatment. For infliximab, a dose of 3-5 mg/kg seems to be required, and intervals between 6 and 12 weeks are necessary to suppress disease activity continually. The standard dosage of etanercept is 2 x 25 mg subcutaneously (s.c.) per week. There are very few studies with adalimumab (standard dose in RA 20-40 mg s.c. every 1-2 weeks) in SpA. Infliximab and etanercept are now both approved for AS in Europe. There is some evidence that both agents also work in other SpA, especially in PsA. Withdrawal of long-term therapy in AS patients led to relapses of disease after several months. Less radiographic progression after 2 years of continuous treatment with infliximab compared to conventional therapy has been suggested in a small study. Serious adverse events on anti-TNF therapy have remained rare. However, severe infections, including tuberculosis, have been reported. These can be largely prevented by appropriate screening. The benefits of anti-TNF therapy in AS seem to outweigh these shortcomings.

The comparative effectiveness of tumor necrosis factor-blocking agents in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a six-month, longitudinal, observational, multicenter study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-blocking agents (etanercept and infliximab) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

METHODS

Data from an ongoing longitudinal, observational study in Norway were used to assess changes in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with RA (n = 291) and AS (n = 62). Patients received anti-TNF therapy, and changes in scores on the Short Form 36 (SF-36), SF-6D, modified Health Assessment Questionnaire, and visual analog scales for patients' assessments of pain, fatigue, and global status from baseline to followup examinations at 3 and 6 months were compared. Data were adjusted for age, sex, and baseline values and are presented as crude estimates as well as standardized response means.

RESULTS

Both groups had improvements in all measures at 3 and 6 months. At 3 months, the changes were significantly better in the AS group compared with the RA group for all measures except the SF-36 social functioning scores. At 6 months, all changes were numerically greater in the AS group. Differences were significant for the SF-36 role emotional scores and were borderline significant for the SF-36 physical functioning, role physical, and vitality scores and for the SF-6D scores.

CONCLUSION

In this real-life setting, patients with AS experienced improvement in HRQOL that was comparable to, and sometimes greater than, that observed in RA patients. These results support the idea that patients with AS should have the same access to TNF-blocking agents as patients with RA.