Is ketamine or its preservative responsible for neurotoxicity in the rabbit?

Postoperative pain relief after hepatic resection in cirrhotic patients: the efficacy of a single small dose of ketamine plus morphine epidurally

In cirrhotic patients undergoing hepatic surgery, postoperative analgesia remains a challenge. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of a single dose of morphine combined with small-dose ketamine given epidurally for postoperative pain relief. One-hundred-four classification "Child A" cirrhotic patients were randomly assigned to two groups: 1) (MKG, n = 54): epidural morphine (3.5-5 mg) plus ketamine (20/30 mg); and 2) epidural morphine (3.5/5 mg) (MG, n = 50). The level of analgesia, side effects, psychomimetic and neurological disorders, additional analgesic needs, and overall quality of the analgesia were recorded. The mean duration of analgesia was longer in the MKG group (27.2 +/- 8 h versus 16.4 +/- 10 h; P < 0.05). In the MKG group, the visual analog scale (VAS) score began to be significantly lower from 14 h at rest and 12 h on coughing until the end of the study. The need for additional analgesia was also smaller in the MKG group (P < 0.05): at 24 h, only 10% of patients in the MKG group needed complementary analgesia, whereas in the MG group it was 100% (P = 0.003). Side effects were similar in both groups. Psychomimetic side effects and neurological disorders were not detected. These results suggest that postoperative analgesia provided by a single dose of epidural morphine with small-dose ketamine is effective in cirrhotic Child's A patients having major upper abdominal surgery.

The comparison of caudal ketamine, alfentanil and ketamine plus alfentanil administration for postoperative analgesia in children

BACKGROUND

Our aim was to compare the effect of single dose caudal ketamine, alfentanil or a mixture of both drugs in the treatment of pain after hypospadias repair surgery in children.

METHODS

The group comprised 109 boys, ASA I-II, aged 1-9 years, who were undergoing hypospadias repair surgery as day cases. The children were randomly divided into three groups for postoperative analgesia: group 1, only alfentanil (20 microg x kg(-10) was given caudally; group 2, ketamine (0.5 mg x kg(-1)) alone; and group 3, alfentanil (20 microg x kg(-1))-ketamine (0.5 mg x kg(-1)) was given caudally. The analgesic effect of caudal block was evaluated using the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS) and sedation was assessed using a five-point sedation score. The first analgesic requirement time and the number of supplementary analgesics required by each child in a 24-h period were also recorded.

RESULTS

No statistical differences were found in demographic characteristics, haemodynamic and respiratory parameters, objective pain scores, postoperative sedation scores and duration of surgery among the groups. The median time to first analgesia was significantly shorter in group 1 than in groups 2 and 3 (P=0.009, P=0.001). Significantly more patients in group 1 required additional postoperative analgesia (paracetamol 15 mg x kg(-1)) compared with groups 2 and 3 (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Caudal administration of ketamine 0.5 mg.kg-1 with or without alfentanil in children produced satisfactory postoperative analgesia without respiratory depression or other side-effects.

Preoperative epidural ketamine in combination with morphine does not have a clinically relevant intra- and postoperative opioid-sparing effect

In this prospective, randomized, and double-blinded clinical trial, we evaluated the efficacy of preincisional administration of epidural ketamine with morphine compared with epidural morphine alone for postoperative pain relief after major upper-abdominal surgery. We studied 50 ASA I and II patients undergoing major upper-abdominal procedures. These patients were randomly allocated to one of the two treatment groups: patients in Group 1 received epidural morphine 50 microg/kg, whereas those in Group 2 received epidural ketamine 1 mg/kg combined with 50 microg/kg of morphine 30 min before incision. Intraoperative analgesia was provided in addition, with IV morphine, and the requirement was noted. A blinded observer using a visual analog scale for pain assessment observed patients for 48 h after surgery. Additional doses of epidural morphine were provided when the visual analog scale score was more than 4. Analgesic requirements and side effects were compared between the two groups. There were no differences between the two groups with respect to age, sex, weight, or duration or type of the surgical procedures. The intraoperative morphine requirement was significantly (P = 0.018) less in Group 2 patients (median, 6.8 mg; range, 3-15 mg) compared with patients in Group 1 (median, 8.3 mg; range, 4.5-15 mg). The time for the first requirement of analgesia was significantly (P = 0.021) longer (median, 17 h; range, 10-48 h) in Group 2 patients than in Group 1 (median, 12 h; range, 4-36 h). The total number of supplemental doses of epidural morphine required in the first 48 h after surgery was comparable (P = 0.1977) in both groups. Sedation scores were similar in both groups. One patient in Group 2 developed hallucinations after study drug administration. None of the patients in either group developed respiratory depression. Other side effects, such as pruritus, nausea, and vomiting, were also similar in both groups. Although the addition of ketamine had synergistic analgesic effects with morphine (reduced intraoperative morphine consumption and prolonged time for first requirement of analgesia), there was no long- lasting preemptive benefit seen with this combination (in terms of reduction in supplemental analgesia) for patients undergoing major upper-abdominal procedures.

IMPLICATIONS

Ketamine added to epidural morphine given before surgery can decrease postoperative pain by its preemptive effect, opioid potentiation, and prevention of acute opioid tolerance. A single epidural bolus of 1 mg/kg of ketamine with morphine given before major upper-abdominal surgery did not result in a clinically relevant reduction in postoperative pain relief.

The long-term antinociceptive effect of intrathecal S(+)-ketamine in a patient with established morphine tolerance

IMPLICATIONS

Our report describes for the first time the continuous long-term intrathecal application of S(+)-ketamine in a patient with chronic pain and morphine tolerance. Intrathecally applied S(+)-ketamine led to a significant pain reduction and consecutively reduced the doses of intrathecal morphine required for pain relief even several weeks after the cessation of the 24-day period of intrathecal S(+)-ketamine administration.

Pharmaceutics for the anaesthetist

Pharmaceutics is that branch of science concerned with the manufacture and formulation of pharmaceutical products, and is a subject almost exclusively in the domain of pharmacists and those concerned with pharmaceutical manufacture. However, there are some aspects of pharmaceutics that are of particular importance to the anaesthetist, such as the pharmacology of the various preservatives, antimicrobials and other additives found in anaesthetic products, and an understanding of basic processes such as emulsification and lyophylisation. This review aims to survey those areas.

Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of epidural ketamine combined with morphine for postoperative analgesia after major upper abdominal surgery

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of the combination of epidural ketamine and morphine compared with epidural morphine alone for postoperative pain relief following major upper abdominal surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, double-blinded study.

SETTING

Tertiary care referral and teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

46 ASA physical status I and II patients who underwent major upper abdominal procedures.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly allocated to one of the two treatment groups: patients in Group 1 received epidural morphine 50 microg/kg whereas patients in Group 2 received epidural ketamine 1 mg/kg combined with 50 microg/kg of morphine postoperatively.

MEASUREMENTS

A blinded observer using a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain assessment followed up patients for 48 hours postoperatively. Top-up dose of epidural morphine was provided when VAS was higher than 4. Analgesic requirements and side effects were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Only 40 patients completed the study. There were no differences between the two groups with respect to age, gender, weight, duration, or type of surgical procedure or intraoperative opioid requirements. Onset of analgesia was faster (p < 0.001) in Group 2 (11 min) than in Group 1 patients (25 min). The time for first requirement of analgesia was significantly (p < 0.01) longer (19.8 +/- 9.8 hours) in Group 2 patients than Group 1 (12.8 +/- 6.2 hours). Total number of supplemental doses of epidural morphine required in the first 48 hours postoperatively was also significantly less (p < 0.005) in Group 2 compared to Group 1. Patients in Group 2 had higher sedation scores than Group I patients for the first 2 hours postoperatively. None of the patients in either group developed hallucinations or respiratory depression. Other side effects such as pruritus, nausea, and vomiting were also similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of epidural ketamine 1 mg/kg to morphine 50 microg/kg improved analgesia after major upper abdominal surgery without increasing side effects.

A review of the nonmedical use of ketamine: use, users and consequences

Ketamine is a dissociative anesthetic with an accepted place in human medicine. Ketamine also has psychedelic properties, and there has been a recent increase in nonmedical use linked with the growth of the "dance culture." This has attracted little comment in the formal literature but has been the subject of many reports in the media. Myths and misunderstandings are common. The psychedelic properties of ketamine have also led to its use as an adjunct to psychotherapy. This review is intended as a resource for the wide range of persons now requesting accurate information about the nonmedical use of ketamine. It accepts the current necessity of sometimes referring to anecdotal reports while seeking to encourage an increase in formal research. The review includes the history of ketamine, its growing role as a "dance drug," the sought-after effects (including the near-death experience) for which it is taken in a nonmedical context, how these are produced, common mental and physical adverse effects, and the ketamine model of schizophrenia.

Effects of intrathecal ketamine added to bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia

We prospectively studied 30 healthy female patients undergoing intracavitory brachytherapy applicator insertion for carcinoma of the cervix under spinal anaesthesia. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either intrathecal bupivacaine 10 mg alone or bupivacaine 7.5 mg combined with preservative-free ketamine 25 mg. Spinal block onset, maximum sensory level, duration of blockade, haemodynamic variables, postoperative analgesic requirements and adverse events were recorded. Onset of sensory and motor block and duration of spinal analgesia were comparable between groups. Duration of motor blockade was shorter (p = 0.0416) and requirement for intravenous fluids in the peri-operative period was less (p = 0.0159) in the ketamine group. Significantly more patients in the ketamine group had adverse events, such as sedation, dizziness, nystagmus, 'strange feelings' and postoperative nausea and vomiting. Although the addition of ketamine to spinal bupivacaine had local anaesthetic sparing effects, it did not provide extended postoperative analgesia or decrease the postoperative analgesic requirements. Moreover, the central adverse effects of ketamine limit its spinal application.

Evidence-based review of the literature on intrathecal delivery of pain medication

Evidence-based medicine depends on the existence of controlled clinical trials that establish the safety and efficacy of specific therapeutic techniques. Many interventions in clinical practice have achieved widespread acceptance despite little evidence to support them in the scientific literature; the critical appraisal of these interventions based on accumulating experience is a goal of medicine. To clarify the current state of knowledge concerning the use of various drugs for intraspinal infusion in pain management, an expert panel conducted a thorough review of the published literature. The exhaustive review included 5 different groups of compounds, with morphine and bupivacaine yielding the most citations in the literature. The need for additional large published controlled studies was highlighted by this review, especially for promising agents that have been shown to be safe and efficacious in recent clinical studies.

Ketamine: new uses for an old drug

Over the years, ketamine has found many applications in paediatric anaesthesiology. Recent insights into the mechanism of its central action, and the pharmacology of its isomers have led to a re-evaluation of this drug, expanding the range of indications in adults. The best examples of the uses of ketamine as an analgesic are: in brief diagnostic or therapeutic procedures, during the post-operative period in neonates and infants as well as in paediatric anaesthesia and intensive care.

Spinal coadministration of ketamine reduces the development of tolerance to visceral as well as somatic antinociception during spinal morphine infusion

This study was designed to investigate the effects of ketamine, an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, on the development of tolerance to morphine and morphine antinociception during intrathecal infusion. Two intrathecal catheters were implanted in the subarachnoid space in male rats under pentobarbital anesthesia. One catheter was used for the intrathecal infusion with the following solutions: morphine 1 microg x kg(-1) x hr(-1)(M1) and 5 microg x kg(-1) x hr(-1) (M5);ketamine 250 microg x kg(-1) x hr(-1) (K250); morphine plus ketamine, 1 microg x kg(-1) x hr(-1) plus 250 microg x kg(-1) x hr(-1) (M1 + K250) and 5 microg x kg(-1) x hr(-1) + 250 microg x kg(-1) x hr(-1) (M5 + K250); or saline. The other catheter was used for morphine challenge tests. The responses to noxious somatic and visceral stimuli were measured by tail flick (TF) and colorectal distension (CD) tests, respectively. Measurements were performed once a day for 7 days. Challenge tests with intrathecal morphine were performed to assess the magnitude of tolerance on Day 5 and Day 7. The antinociceptive effect was evaluated by using the percent of maximal possible effect (%MPE). Morphine infusion produced significant increases in %MPEs in TF and CD tests, while the saline and K250 infusions did not show any changes. The M1 + K250 infusion significantly increased the %MPEs in TF and CD tests, although the M1 and K250 infusions alone showed no changes. M5 + K250 enhanced the increases of %MPEs in TF and CD tests compared with the M5 infusion alone. In the challenge tests, the M1 + K250 infusion showed no significant decrease in %MPEs and TF and CD tests. The M5 + K250 infusion significantly inhibited those decreases in %MPEs, although the M5 infusion showed significant decreases in TF and CD tests. We concluded that ketamine attenuated the development of morphine tolerance to antinociceptive effects and increased the somatic and visceral antinociception of morphine.

IMPLICATIONS

Intrathecally coinfused ketamine attenuated morphine tolerance to somatic and visceral antinociception and increased morphine antinociception at the spinal level. These results suggest that a combination of morphine with ketamine may have an advantage in long-term use of opioids for controlling visceral as well as somatic pain.

Histological findings after long-term infusion of intrathecal ketamine for chronic pain: a case report

Ketamine, a selective, noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-receptor antagonist, is able to alter pain perception at the spinal level. Little clinical data exist on the intrathecal and epidural use of ketamine in chronic pain. Histopathologic findings after intrathecal injection of ketamine with and without preservatives are rarely reported. This outcome was evaluated in a 72-year-old woman with abdominal pain due to cancer who was treated with the intrathecal application of bupivacaine, clonidine, and morphine. We reached satisfactory pain relief with the addition of ketamine to the mixture for 7 days. On postmortem, focal lymphocytic vasculitis close to the catheter injection site was found. This finding has not been described previously after long-term application of ketamine intrathecally. The intrathecal infusion of ketamine with preservative, or the mixture of ketamine, clonidine, morphine, and bupivacaine resulted in isolated lymphocytic vasculitis of the spinal cord and leptomeninges without any clinical signs of neurological deficit.

Use and efficacy of low-dose ketamine in the management of acute postoperative pain: a review of current techniques and outcomes

Ketamine hydrochloride is a well known general anesthetic and short acting analgesic in use for almost 3 decades. The role of the NMDA receptor in the processing of nociceptive input has led naturally to renewed clinical interest in N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists such as ketamine. This paper reviews the use and efficacy of low-dose ketamine in the management of acute postoperative pain. The literature was obtained from a computer search of the MEDLINE database from 1966 through December 1998. Studies were included for review if they were randomized, prospective, controlled, double-blind and reported pain scores. We evaluate the clinical literature and discuss the efficacy of low-dose ketamine in the management of acute postoperative pain when administered alone or in conjunction with other agents via the oral, intramuscular, subcutaneous, intravenous and intraspinal routes. Low-dose ketamine is defined as a bolus dose of less than 2 mg/g when given intramuscularly or less than 1 mg/kg when administered via the intravenous or epidural route. For continuous i.v. administration low-dose ketamine is defined as a rate of < or =20 microg/kg per min. We conclude that ketamine may provide clinicians with a tool to improve postoperative pain management and to reduce opioid related adverse effects. The evidence suggests that low-dose ketamine may play an important role in postoperative pain management when used as an adjunct to local anesthetics, opioids, or other analgesic agents. Further research is required in the following areas: (a) dose-finding studies for ketamine as an adjunct to opioids and local anesthetics (b) efficacy and optimal route of administration (c) the role of S(+)-ketamine; (d) the influence of ketamine on long-term outcome such as chronic pain (e) long-term physical and chemical stability of mixtures containing ketamine (f) spinal toxicity of ketamine and (g) effects of low-dose ketamine on cognitive and memory functioning after surgery.

The neurotoxicity of drugs given intrathecally (spinal)

Overall, most spinal drugs in clinical use have been poorly studied for spinal cord and nerve root toxicity. Laboratory studies indicate that all local anesthetics are neurotoxic in high concentrations and that lidocaine and tetracaine have neurotoxic potential in clinically used concentrations. However, spinal anesthesia (including lidocaine and tetracaine) has a long and enviable history of safety. Spinal analgesics such as morphine, fentanyl, sufentanil, clonidine, and neostigmine seem to have a low potential for neurotoxicity based on laboratory and extensive clinical use. Most antioxidants, preservatives, and excipients used in commercial formulations seem to have a low potential for neurotoxicity. In addition to summarizing current information, we hope that this review stimulates future research on spinal drugs to follow a systematic approach to determining potential neurotoxicity. Such an approach would examine histologic, physiologic, and behavioral testing in several species, followed by cautious histologic, physiologic, and clinical testing in human volunteers and patients with terminal cancer refractory to conventional therapy.

Promising non-narcotic analgesic techniques for labour

Epidural analgesia and spinal analgesia are the most effective techniques for relieving labour pain. Basically, local anaesthetics (i.e. bupivacaine) and opioids (i.e. fentanyl or sufentanil), especially when combined, produce excellent analgesia with minimal motor blockade. However, none of these agents is devoid of side-effects and analgesia remains sometimes imperfect, suggesting that new drugs would be welcome. Adrenalin and clonidine act on a2-adrenoceptors in the spinal cord and both have been found to improve analgesia. These two drugs have already been used in many patients and studies because the absence of neurotoxicity has been well documented. Clonidine looks more attractive, although sedation and hypotension limit its use. Other analgesic drugs are promising alternatives but are still at an experimental or very early clinical stage. Neostigmine and ketamine (without preservative) are not neurotoxic while midazolam neurotoxicity is still controversial. Intravenous remifentanil might prove useful when neuraxial analgesia is contraindicated.

Antinociceptive effect of the S(+)-enantiomer of ketamine on carrageenan hyperalgesia after intrathecal administration in rats

Ketamine exerts antinociceptive effects in many pain tests. We investigated the antinociceptive effect of intrathecally administered racemic ketamine and its S(+)- and R(-)-enantiomer on carrageenan-induced thermal hyperalgesia with a paw withdrawal test and acute pain (hot plate and tailflick) tests. Rats were prepared with a chronic lumbar intrathecal catheter to receive either saline or ketamine enantiomers in cumulative doses. None of the ketamines (10, 50, or 100 microg) had any effect on the withdrawal latency of the contralateral, noninjected paw. In the injected paw, intrathecal saline did not alter carrageenan-induced thermal hyperalgesia, whereas intrathecally applied S(+)-, R(-)-, and racemic ketamine decreased thermal hyperalgesia. However, compared with saline, racemic ketamine had a higher efficacy than S(+)-ketamine, whereas R(-)-ketamine did not achieve statistical significance. Neither S(+)- nor R(-)-ketamine had a significant effect in the tailflick test (10, 100, or 500 microg). In the hot plate test, only the largest dose of ketamine (500 microg) caused a nonstereospecific, significant increase in hot plate latency; this dose caused supraspinal effects as well. The results demonstrate that the behavioral hyperalgesia associated with carrageenan-induced hindpaw inflammation in rats is attenuated by the intrathecal administration of racemic and S(+)-ketamine, but not R(-)-ketamine, which only displayed an insignificant trend toward a dose-response relationship. This finding warrants further studies to investigate a possible clinical advantage of preservative-free S(+)-ketamine over the currently used preservative containing racemic mixture.

IMPLICATIONS

In rats, intrathecal S(+)-ketamine was effective for treating inflammatory pain. Although racemic ketamine has a greater efficacy, S(+)-ketamine is available as a preservative-free drug and might be of clinical interest for future neuraxial administration in different pain states.

The efficacy and safety of a clonidine/bupivacaine combination in caudal blockade for pediatric hernia repair

We evaluated the analgesic efficacy and hemodynamic and respiratory safety of clonidine when added to bupivacaine for caudal blocks in 58 children aged 38 +/- 2 mo (mean +/- SEM). Patients scheduled for ambulatory hernia repair were randomly given a caudal injection (0.75 mL/kg) of either saline placebo (P group), bupivacaine, 0.25% (B group), bupivacaine plus epinephrine 1:200,000 (BE group), bupivacaine plus clonidine 1 microgram/kg (BC1 group), or bupivacaine plus clonidine 2 micrograms/kg (BC2 group). Postoperative measurements included duration of analgesia, hemodynamics, and respiratory monitoring for 6 h. Thereafter, parents assessed their child's analgesic requirements at home every 3 h for 18 h. The duration of analgesia (median [range]) was significantly longer (P < 0.05) in the BC1 and BC2 groups (360 [270-360] min and 360 [355-360] min, respectively) compared with the P (77[45-190]), B (346[105-360]), or BE group (300[75-360]). Similarly, the BC1 and BC2 groups required less additional analgesic within the first 24 h. All groups showed a significant decrease in mean arterial pressure compared with baseline values, but the differences among the groups were not significant. Bradycardia and respiratory depression were not observed. Clonidine 1 and 2 micrograms/kg can be safely added to bupivacaine caudal blockade in small children for ambulatory hernia repair to achieve an increased duration of analgesia compared with bupivacaine alone or bupivacaine plus epinephrine.

IMPLICATIONS

The addition of clonidine, an antihypertensive drug with analgesic properties, to local anesthetics in caudal blocks prolongs postoperative pain relief and reduces the need for additional pain treatment in children after hernia operation.

The efficacy and safety of a clonidine/bupivacaine combination in caudal blockade for pediatric hernia repair

We evaluated the analgesic efficacy and hemodynamic and respiratory safety of clonidine when added to bupivacaine for caudal blocks in 58 children aged 38 +/- 2 mo (mean +/- SEM). Patients scheduled for ambulatory hernia repair were randomly given a caudal injection (0.75 mL/kg) of either saline placebo (P group), bupivacaine, 0.25% (B group), bupivacaine plus epinephrine 1:200,000 (BE group), bupivacaine plus clonidine 1 microgram/kg (BC1 group), or bupivacaine plus clonidine 2 micrograms/kg (BC2 group). Postoperative measurements included duration of analgesia, hemodynamics, and respiratory monitoring for 6 h. Thereafter, parents assessed their child's analgesic requirements at home every 3 h for 18 h. The duration of analgesia (median [range]) was significantly longer (P < 0.05) in the BC1 and BC2 groups (360 [270-360] min and 360 [355-360] min, respectively) compared with the P (77[45-190]), B (346[105-360]), or BE group (300[75-360]). Similarly, the BC1 and BC2 groups required less additional analgesic within the first 24 h. All groups showed a significant decrease in mean arterial pressure compared with baseline values, but the differences among the groups were not significant. Bradycardia and respiratory depression were not observed. Clonidine 1 and 2 micrograms/kg can be safely added to bupivacaine caudal blockade in small children for ambulatory hernia repair to achieve an increased duration of analgesia compared with bupivacaine alone or bupivacaine plus epinephrine.

IMPLICATIONS

The addition of clonidine, an antihypertensive drug with analgesic properties, to local anesthetics in caudal blocks prolongs postoperative pain relief and reduces the need for additional pain treatment in children after hernia operation.

Neurotoxicological assessment after intracisternal injection of liposomal bupivacaine in rabbits

Experiments were performed on rabbits randomly assigned to intracisternally receive 0.3 mL of plain bupivacaine 5 mg/mL, liposomal bupivacaine 5 mg/mL, bupivacaine-free liposomes, or isotonic phosphate-buffered saline. Mechanical ventilation was initiated or intravenous dopamine was infused when respiratory depression or hypotension occurred. Seven days after the injection, the whole spinal cord was removed and histopathologic characteristics were studied on transverse sections. All preparations were devoid of phosphatidylcholine hydrolysis or oxidation compounds. Solutions without bupivacaine produced transient irritative signs that required sedation in most rabbits. Despite the similar duration of respiratory depression in groups receiving liposomal or plain bupivacaine, liposomes produced significantly prolonged motor blockade (126 vs 70 min). Correction of hypotension after plain bupivacaine required a longer dopamine infusion and larger doses than after liposomal bupivacaine (28 vs 18 min and 74 vs 47 mg). Necrosis was observed in the cervical area of two rabbits (one in the liposomal bupivacaine group and another in the phosphate buffer group). No demyelinated areas were noted in spinal cord examinations. We conclude that liposomal bupivacaine leads to a less severe sympathetic block and to a prolonged motor block, whereas histologic changes are not significantly different among groups.

IMPLICATIONS

Multilamellar liposomes containing bupivacaine administered intracisternally to rabbits produce spinal cord histopathologic changes not significantly different from those observed with plain bupivacaine. Sustained release of bupivacaine from liposomes is suggested by the prolonged motor blockade and the reduced severity of arterial hypotension. Use of these liposomes could prolong the local anesthetic effects of bupivacaine.

Alternative routes of drug administration--advantages and disadvantages (subject review). American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Drugs

During the past 20 years, advances in drug formulations and innovative routes of administration have been made. Our understanding of drug transport across tissues has increased. These changes have often resulted in improved patient adherence to the therapeutic regimen and pharmacologic response. The administration of drugs by transdermal or transmucosal routes offers the advantage of being relatively painless.12 Also, the potential for greater flexibility in a variety of clinical situations exists, often precluding the need to establish intravenous access, which is a particular benefit for children.

This statement focuses on the advantages and disadvantages of alternative routes of drug administration. Issues of particular importance in the care of pediatric patients, especially factors that could lead to drug-related toxicity or adverse responses, are emphasized.

Pre-emptive analgesia with ketamine, morphine and epidural lidocaine prior to total knee replacement

PURPOSE

Pre-emptive analgesia can improve postoperative pain management. The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of ketamine as a pre-emptive analgesic as previous studies have shown the involvement of N-methyl-D-Aspartate (NMDA) receptor in neuroplasticity.

METHODS

Forty-five ASA 1-2 patients, undergoing unilateral total knee replacement were studied. In the study groups, epidural lidocaine was used as the primary anaesthestic. Patients received ketamine + morphine epidurally 30 min either before (group EB) or after skin incision (group EA). Group G patients received general anaesthesia and ketamine + morphine were given 30 min after skin incision via an epidural catheter used for postoperative pain control. Epidural morphine and ketamine in lidocaine was given to all patients at the end of surgery and every 12 hr for three days for analgesia supplemented with PCA morphine. The time until first PCA trigger, morphine consumption, pain scores, satisfaction scores, and morphine related side effects were recorded at 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hr after surgery.

RESULTS

Epidural ketamine plus morphine with lidocaine before surgical incision produced better pain relief and patient satisfaction than when given after incision. A longer time to PCA and decreased morphine consumption were observed in group EB than in group G. In group EA, epidural anaesthesia also produced some pre-emptive analgesic effect compared with general anaesthesia shown by decreased morphine consumption.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of ketamine plus morphine with epidural lidocaine anesthesia before surgery provided improved postoperative analgesia compared with general anaesthesia alone or when analgesics were given after skin incision.

[Neurotoxicity of intrathecally administrated agents]

Spinal anaesthetics can induce histopathologic lesions and regional haemodynamic alterations in the spinal cord. There are numerous causes of neurologic lesions, including direct trauma of the spinal cord and nerve roots during puncture or catheter insertion, compromised spinal cord perfusion and direct neurotoxic effect. Histopathologic lesions are localized either in meninges (meningitis or arachnoiditis) or in neuraxis (myelitis or axonal degeneration). Neurotoxicity can result from decrease in neuronal blood supply, elicited by high concentrations of the solutions, long duration exposure to local anaesthetics, and the use of adjuvants. They have been implicated in the occurrence of cauda equina syndrome after continuous spinal anaesthesia using hyperbaric solution of lidocaine and tetracaine given through small diameter catheters. Selective spinal analgesia is induced by spinal opioids without motor blockade except for meperidine. Complications occurred in patients after high doses of morphine, which were related to one of its metabolites, morphine-3-glucuronide. Preservative-free opioid solutions are to be preferred for spinal anaesthesia. There is no report of neurotoxicity neither in animal studies, nor in humans, using spinal clonidine. In order to reduce the incidence of neurotoxicity, some safety rules should be followed. The lowest efficient dose of local anaesthetics must be given. Incomplete blockade should not necessarily lead to a reinjection. Large volume of hyperbaric lidocaine or repeated injections of such solutions must be avoided as well as preservative-containing solutions. The administration of new compounds by the spinal route must be supported by data of spinal neuropharmacology and the lack of neurotoxicity must have been previously checked with animal studies.