Mortality and morbidity rates, postoperative course, quality of life, and prognosis after extended radical lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Comparison of three-field lymphadenectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy

Long-term complete response in supraclavicular lymph node metastases of esophageal cancer using systemic chemotherapy-a case report

Esophageal cancer (EC) is a highly lethal disease. We report here a patient with supraclavicular lymph node metastases of esophageal cancer, who was successfully treated by systemic chemotherapy containing 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), docetaxel and cisplatin (CDDP). The patient, a 53-year-old woman, was diagnosed as having squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus upon endoscopic examination. She underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin (CDDP), 5-fluorouraol (5-FU)(CF) for four courses. Then, a chest CT revealed that the esophageal tumor and mediastina lymph node metastases had markedly decreased in size to the point of being unmeasurable. Due to the patient refusing surgery and radiotherapy, and because her general condition was favorable, 2 courses of systemic chemotherapy with docetaxel, CDDP, 5-FU (DCF) were administered. CT showed the supraclavicular lymph node and esophageal tumor disappeared. No tumor recurrence has occurred in the 5 years and 8 months since the first cancer cure. Therefore, in patents whose general conditions are favorable, DCF should be considered as a treatment option for advanced esophageal cancer.

Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes between 3-field and modern 2-field lymph node dissections for thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis

OBJECTIVES

Our goal was to compare short- and long-term outcomes between 3-field lymphadenectomy (3-FL) and modern 2-field lymphadenectomy (2-FL) in patients with thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS

We reviewed clinical outcomes for 298 patients with thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent 3-FL or modern 2-FL from March 2008 to December 2013 at a major cancer hospital in Guangzhou, southern China. Propensity score matching was used to balance baseline differences, and 83 pairs of cases were selected. Postoperative complications, recurrence patterns and survival outcomes were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

Compared with modern 2-FL, 3-FL led to higher overall operative morbidity rates [78.3% vs 61.4%, odds ratio (OR) 2.266, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.143-4.490; P = 0.019], with higher recurrent nerve palsy rates (47.0% vs 19.3%, OR 3.712, 95% CI 1.852-7.438; P < 0.0001), more respiratory failures (18.1% vs 6.0%, OR 3.441, 95% CI 1.189-9.963; P = 0.023) and longer postoperative hospital stays (23 vs 17 days, P = 0.002). The 5-year overall survival rate (58.5% vs 59.4%; P = 0.960) and the 5-year disease-free survival rate 50.1% vs 54.5%; P = 0.482) were comparable between the 2 groups. Multivariable analysis showed that additional cervical lymph node dissection was not associated with overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) 1.039, 95% CI 0.637-1.696; P = 0.878] and disease-free survival (HR 0.868, 95% CI 0.548-1.376; P = 0.547). The overall recurrence rate and cervical nodal recurrence rate were not significantly different between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Additional cervical lymphadenectomy did not lead to added survival benefit when compared with modern 2-FL in patients with thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Recurrence was similar in patients undergoing 3-FL and modern 2-FL. 3-FL resulted in more postoperative complications.

Current status and future direction of lymph node dissection in radical surgery for esophageal cancer

Surgical resection is the main treatment for esophageal cancer. Lymph node dissection is an essential part of radical surgery for esophageal cancer. However, the extent of dissection, numbers of lymph nodes, and sentinel lymph nodes in lymphadenectomy are still under debate. However, a clinical practice consensus has gradually formed despite this dispute.

Right versus left thoracic approach oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

INTRODUCTION

Oesophageal cancer is one of the most common malignant tumours and has been identified as one of the leading causes of cancer death worldwide. Surgery is considered to be the optimal treatment for patients with resectable oesophageal cancer. Oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer can significantly extend the survival period of patients and provide a potential opportunity for a cure. However, there is still controversy regarding which thoracic approach (right or left) during oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer can lead to better surgical outcomes globally. This systematic review and meta-analysis will be performed to determine which thoracic approach during oesophagectomy will achieve longer patient survival and will be more beneficial for patients.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will search PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cancerlit, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Google Scholar databases for relevant clinical trials published in any language before 1 October 2019. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs, propensity score-matched comparative studies and prospective cohort studies of interest, published or unpublished, that meet the inclusion criteria will be included. Subgroup analysis of the type of operation, tumour pathological stage and ethnicity will be performed.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42019124133.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Because this study will be based on published or unpublished records and studies, there is no need for ethics approval. The results of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

The impact of cervical lymph node dissection on acid and duodenogastroesophageal reflux after intrathoracic esophagogastrostomy following transthoracic esophagectomy

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of cervical lymph node dissection on acid reflux and duodenogastroesophageal reflux (DGER) in patients undergoing transthoracic esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction and intrathoracic esophagogastrostomy.

METHODS

Thirty-one patients receiving transthoracic esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction by intrathoracic esophagogastrostomy were divided into the following two groups: a two-field lymph node dissection group (2F group) and a three-field lymph node dissection group (3F group). All patients underwent 24-h pH and bilirubin monitoring and gastrointestinal endoscopy at 1 year after surgery. The 24-h pH and bilirubin monitoring results, endoscopic findings, and reflux symptoms were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

No acid reflux was observed in the 2F group, whereas it was observed in 6 (40%) patients in the 3F group (p = 0.007). DGER was found in 2 patients (13%) in the 2F group and in 8 (53%) in the 3F group (p = 0.023). Four patients (25%) in the 2F group and 9 (60%) in the 3F group (p = 0.048) had reflux esophagitis.

CONCLUSION

Cervical lymph node dissection increases acid reflux and DGER and can lead to an increase in the incidence of reflux esophagitis in patients undergoing intrathoracic esophagogastrostomy.

Combined recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring and one-lung ventilation using the EZ-Blocker and an electromyographic endotracheal tube

Background

Intraoperative neuromuscular monitoring (IONM) is a widespread procedure to identify and protect the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) during thyroid surgery. However, for left thoracic surgery with high risk of RLN injury, both reliable recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring and one-lung ventilation could interfere.

Methods

In this prospective study, a new method for IONM during one-lung ventilation combining RLN monitoring with an electromyographic (EMG) endotracheal tube (ETT) and lung separation using the EZ-Blocker (EZB) is described and its clinical feasibility and effectiveness were assessed.

Results

A total of 14 patients undergoing left upper lobe surgery and left upper mediastinal lymph node dissection were enrolled. The EZB was introduced and positioned without any problems and sufficient lung collapse was achieved in all patients. No tracheobronchial injuries or immediate complications occurred. A stable EMG signal was present in all patients and no RLN palsy and no negative side effects of the NIM EMG ETT or the EZB were observed postoperatively.

Conclusions

The described method is technically feasible, easy to apply and save. It provides both reliable IONM and independent lung separation for optimal surgical exposure. The combined use of the EZB and the NIM EMG ETT might reduce the risk for RLN palsy and impaired lung separation during left thoracic surgery with high risk for RLN injury.

Influence of Preoperative Oropharyngeal Microflora on the Occurrence of Postoperative Pneumonia and Survival in Patients Undergoing Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to clarify the correlation between oropharyngeal microflora and postoperative complications as well as long-term survival after esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND

Although the oral cavity is known to be a potential reservoir for pathogens, the influence of abnormal oropharyngeal microflora on the outcomes of patients undergoing esophagectomy remains unknown.

METHODS

This study included 675 patients who underwent esophagectomy between 2007 and 2014. Saliva samples from the oropharynx were collected 2 days before the operation. There were 442 patients with indigenous flora (Ind group) and 233 with allopatric flora. Among the patients with allopatric flora, 140 had antibiotic-sensitive microbes only (Allo-S group) while 93 had different types of antibiotic-resistant microbes (Allo-R group). We investigated the correlation between the types of oropharyngeal microflora and the incidence of postoperative complications as well as long-term outcomes.

RESULTS

Sixteen microbes could be cultivated from the saliva samples. The incidence of postoperative pneumonia in the Allo-S and Allo-R groups was significantly higher than in the Ind group (P < 0.001). In addition, acute respiratory distress syndrome was more often observed in the Allo-R group than in the other groups (P = 0.002). A significantly higher rate of antibiotic use and longer hospital stays were observed in the Allo-R group compared with the Ind group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the presence of allopatric antibiotic-resistant microbes in the oropharynx was an independent risk factor for postoperative pneumonia (odds ratio, 3.93; 95% confidence interval, 2.41-6.42). The overall survival was significantly poorer in the Allo-R group than in the other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative oropharyngeal culture is a simple and low-cost method that can predict both the occurrence of postoperative pneumonia and poor prognosis after esophagectomy.

Review of different approaches of the left recurrent laryngeal nerve area for lymphadenectomy during minimally invasive esophagectomy

In order to perform the total mediastinal lymphadenectomy during minimally invasive esophageal resection, doing the lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve (LRLN) may be a difficult part of this intervention. One reason is the need for the correct visualization of the area; another is not wanting to compromise the integrity of the nerve. In this review article the different modalities for approaching this upper mediastinal area by thoracoscopy are described.

Sentinel node navigation surgery in esophageal cancer

Over the last 20 years, the sentinel node (SN) concept has been widely applied to the surgical staging of both breast cancer and melanoma. However, the validity of this concept has been controversial for esophageal cancer, because SN mapping for esophageal cancer is not considered to be technically easy because of the complicated multidirectional lymphatic networks of the esophagus and mediastinum. Nevertheless, studies including meta-analyses indicated that SN mapping may be feasible in early esophageal cancer. Transthoracic esophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy was developed as a potential curative procedure for thoracic esophageal cancer. However, this highly invasive procedure might increase morbidity and reduce patients' quality of life (QOL) after esophagectomy. Although further validation based on multicenter trials using the standard protocol of SN mapping for esophageal cancer is required, SN navigation surgery would enable us to carry out personalized and limited lymph node dissection which might reduce morbidity and maintain patients' QOL.

Update on the indications and results of sentinel node mapping in upper GI cancer

The clinical utilization of sentinel node (SN) mapping for early esophageal cancer or gastric cancer has been unclear for a long time. However, previous investigations regarding SN mapping of these cancers have shown relatively good results with regard to the detection rate and diagnostic accuracy for determining the lymph node status. SN mapping helps obtain information about individual metastatic status and allows the modification of the operation in early-stage upper gastrointestinal (GI) disease. Radio-guided methods for identifying SNs in early esophageal cancer have been established via endoscopic injection of technetium-99m tin colloid. Previous studies have reported that the SN concept seems valid, and radio-guided SN mapping can be feasible in cT1N0 esophageal cancer. SN navigation surgery are believed to have potential as strategies for minimally invasive modified surgery for early esophageal cancer. A Japanese study group conducted a prospective multicenter trial of SN mapping for early gastric cancer using a dual tracer method with radioactive colloid and blue dyes; they demonstrated a high detection rate and accuracy for determining the metastatic status based on SN mapping. Subsequently, minimized gastrectomy, including partial gastrectomy and segmental gastrectomy with individualized selective and modified lymphadenectomy for early gastric cancer with a negative SN has been performed to evaluate the long-term survival and postoperative quality of life (QOL) in a multicenter prospective trial. This study verified the SN concept in early-stage upper GI disease with cN0 and found that function-preserving esophagectomy or gastrectomy may help maintain patients' post-surgical QOL.

PIK3CA mutation is a favorable prognostic factor in esophageal cancer: molecular profile by next-generation sequencing using surgically resected formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue

Background

Practical and reliable genotyping procedures with a considerable number of samples are required not only for risk-adapted therapeutic strategies, but also for stratifying patients into future clinical trials for molecular-targeting drugs. Recent advances in mutation testing, including next-generation sequencing, have led to the increased use of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue. We evaluated gene alteration profiles of cancer-related genes in esophageal cancer patients and correlated them with clinicopathological features, such as smoking status and survival outcomes.

Methods

Surgically resected formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue was collected from 135 consecutive patients with esophageal cancer who underwent esophagectomy. Based on the assessment of DNA quality with a quantitative PCR-based assay, uracil DNA glycosylase pretreatment was performed to ensure quality and accuracy of amplicon-based massively parallel sequencing. Amplicon-based massively parallel sequencing was performed using the Illumina TruSeq® Amplicon Cancer Panel. Gene amplification was detected by quantitative PCR-based assay. Protein expression was determined by automated quantitative fluorescent immunohistochemistry.

Results

Data on genetic alterations were available for 126 patients. The median follow-up time was 1570 days. Amplicon-based massively parallel sequencing identified frequent gene alterations in TP53 (66.7%), PIK3CA (13.5%), APC (10.3%), ERBB4 (7.9%), and FBXW7 (7.9%). There was no association between clinicopathological features or prognosis with smoking status. Multivariate analyses revealed that the PIK3CA mutation and clinical T stage were independent favorable prognostic factors (hazard ratio 0.34, 95% confidence interval: 0.12–0.96, p = 0.042). PIK3CA mutations were significantly associated with APC alterations (p = 0.0007) and BRAF mutations (p = 0.0090).

Conclusions

Our study provided profiles of cancer-related genes in Japanese patients with esophageal cancer by next-generation sequencing using surgically resected formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue, and identified the PIK3CA mutation as a favorable prognosis biomarker.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4733-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Matched-pair comparisons of minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

BACKGROUND

Open esophagectomy (OE) with radical lymphadenectomy is known as one of the most invasive digestive surgeries with the high rate of complications. Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has developed very rapidly and has formed several available technical approaches. This systematic review and meta-analysis is aiming at how beneficial, and to what extent MIE resection really will be.

METHODS

A systematic literature search will be performed through May 31, 2018 using MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar for relevant articles published in any language. Randomized controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, and propensity score matched comparative studies will be included. If data are sufficient, subgroup analyses will be conducted in different surgical procedures of MIE.

RESULTS

The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

CONCLUSION

This will be the first systematic review and meta-analysis using data of randomized controlled, prospective, and propensity score matched comparative studies to compare the outcomes between MIE and OE updating to May 31, 2018.

18 F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography can be used to determine the indication for endoscopic resection of superficial esophageal cancer

¹⁸F‐Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG‐PET) is a useful imaging modality that reflects the tumor activity. However, FDG‐PET is mainly used for advanced cancer, not superficial cancer. In this study, we investigated the relationship between the superficial tumor depth of esophageal cancer and the FDG uptake to determine the indications for endoscopic resection (ER). From 2009 to 2017, 444 patients with esophageal cancer underwent esophagectomy or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), and 195 patients were pathologically diagnosed with superficial cancer. Among them, 146 patients were examined by FDG‐PET before esophagectomy or ESD. In these 146 patients, the relationship between the pathological tumor depth and FDG uptake was analyzed. The mean maximum standardized uptake value in pT1a‐EP/LPM tumors was 1.362 ± 0.890, that in pT1a‐MM/pT1b‐SM1 tumors was 2.453 ± 1.872, and that in pT1b‐SM2/SM3 tumors was 4.265 ± 3.233 (P < .0001). Among 51 pT1a‐EP/LPM tumors, 10 (19.6%) showed positive detection of FDG. For pT1a‐MM/pT1b‐SM1 and pT1b‐SM2/SM3 tumors, the detection rate was 52.9% (18/34) and 82.0% (50/61), respectively. The detection rate of pT1a‐EP/LPM was significantly lower than in the other two groups (P < .0001). Among 10 FDG‐PET‐positive lesions, only 1 had no apparent reason for PET positivity; however, 9 of 10 had a suitable reason for detectability by PET and inadequacy for ER. Negative detection of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by FDG‐PET is useful to determine the indication for ER when the tumor depth cannot be diagnosed even after performing magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging and endoscopic ultrasonography. When FDG uptake is recognized, a therapeutic modality other than ER should be considered.

Effects of S-1 combined with radiotherapy in the treatment of advanced esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

BACKGROUND

Esophageal cancer is one of the worst malignant digestive neoplasms with poor treatment outcomes. Definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has become the standard nonsurgical treatment option for locally advanced esophageal cancer. The chemotherapeutic drugs 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin have been most commonly used in CRT of esophageal cancer. However, radiotherapy combined with 5-FU/cisplatin often delivers severe toxicity to patients. S-1 as an oral chemotherapeutic drug exhibits higher anti-tumor activity, less adverse effects, and better biological availability. S-1 also has excellent effects as a CRT regimen for esophageal cancer.

METHODS

A systematic literature search will be performed through January 2018 using MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar for relevant articles published in any language. Randomized controlled trials, prospective comparative studies will be included. All meta-analyses will be performed using Review Manager software. The quality of the studies will be evaluated using the guidelines listed in the Cochrane Handbook. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statements will be followed until the findings of the systematic review and meta-analysis are reported.

RESULTS

The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

CONCLUSION

Our study will draw an objective conclusion of the effects of S-1 combined with radiotherapy in the treatment of unresectable esophageal cancer and provide level I evidence for clinical decision makings.

Advances in radiotherapy for esophageal cancer

Esophageal cancer is a common type of malignancy worldwide and usually requires multidisciplinary care. Radiotherapy plays an important part in management of the disease. During the past few years, researchers have made much progress about radiotherapy for esophageal cancer, which was revealed in every aspect of clinical practice. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy remains the standard treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer, whereas neoadjuvant chemotherapy appears to show less toxicities and non-inferior prognosis. What's more, definitive chemoradiotherapy could be an option for non-surgical candidates and good responders to chemoradiotherapy. Advances in radiation techniques result in higher conformity, homogeneity, more normal tissue sparing and less treatment time. Promising prognoses and less toxicities were also seen in advanced techniques. As radiation dose higher than 50 Gy obtains better local control and survival, simultaneously integrated boost is designed to increase primary tumor dosage and keep prophylactic dose to subclinical areas. Elective nodal irradiation brings about better local control but do not show advantages in survival compared with involved field irradiation (IFI). As a trend, more tolerable chemoradiotherapy regimen would be taken into account in dealing with elderly patients.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs for esophagectomy protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Esophageal cancer is one of the worst malignant digestive neoplasms with poor treatment outcomes. Esophagectomy plays an important role and offers a potential curable chance to these patients. However, esophagectomy with radical lymphadenectomy is known as one of the most invasive digestive surgeries which are associated with high morbidity and mortality. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol is a patient-centered, surgeon-led system combining anesthesia, nursing, nutrition, and psychology, which is designed for reducing complications, promoting recovery, and improving treatment outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis is aiming at how beneficial, and to what extent ERAS really will be.

METHODS

A systematic literature search will be performed through January 2018 using MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar for relevant articles published in any language. Randomized controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, and propensity-matched comparative studies will be included. All meta-analyses will be performed using Review Manager software. The quality of the studies will be evaluated using the guidelines listed in the Cochrane Handbook. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statements will be followed until the findings of the systematic review and meta-analysis are reported.

RESULTS

The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

CONCLUSION

Our study will draw an objective conclusion of the comparisons between ERAS and conventional care in aspects of perioperative outcomes and provide level I evidences for clinical decision makings.

Clinical value of a prophylactic minitracheostomy after esophagectomy: analysis in patients at high risk for postoperative pulmonary complications

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical value of a prophylactic minitracheostomy (PMT) in patients undergoing an esophagectomy for esophageal cancer and to clarify the indications for a PMT.

METHODS

Ninety-four patients who underwent right transthoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer between January 2009 and December 2013 were studied. Short surgical outcomes were retrospectively compared between 30 patients at high risk for postoperative pulmonary complications who underwent a PMT (PMT group) and 64 patients at standard risk without a PMT (non-PMT group). Furthermore, 12 patients who required a delayed minitracheostomy (DMT) due to postoperative sputum retention were reviewed in detail, and risk factors related to a DMT were also analyzed to assess the indications for a PMT.

RESULTS

Preoperative pulmonary function was lower in the PMT group than in the non-PMT group: FEV1.0 (2.41 vs. 2.68 L, p = 0.035), and the proportion of patients with FEV1.0% <60 (13.3% vs. 0%, p = 0.009). No between-group differences were observed in the proportion of patients who suffered from postoperative pneumonia, atelectasis, or re-intubation due to respiratory failure. Of the 12 patients with a DMT, 11 developed postoperative pneumonia, and three required re-intubation due to severe pneumonia. Multivariate analysis revealed FEV1.0% <70% and vocal cord palsy were independent risk factors related to a DMT.

CONCLUSION

A PMT for high-risk patients may prevent an increase in the incidence of postoperative pneumonia and re-intubation. The PMT indications should be expanded for patients with vocal cord palsy or mild obstructive respiratory disturbances.

Patterns and Prognostic Significance of Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis and the Efficacy of Cervical Node Dissection in Esophageal Cancer

Background

The clinical value of 3-field lymph node dissection (3FLND) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains controversial. This study aimed to identify the patterns and prognostic significance of cervical lymph node metastasis (CLNM) in ESCC.

Methods

A retrospective review of 77 patients with ESCC who underwent esophagectomy and 3FLND between 2002 and 2016 was conducted. For each cervical node level, the efficacy index (EI), overall survival, recurrence rate, and complication rate were compared.

Results

CLNM was identified in 34 patients (44.2%) who underwent 3FLND. Patients with CLNM had a significantly lower overall survival rate (22.7% vs. 58.2%) and a higher recurrence rate (45.9% vs. 16.3%) than patients without CLNM. CLNM was an independent predictor of recurrence in ESCC patients. Moreover, in patients with pathologic N3 tumors, the odds ratio of CLNM was 10.8 (95% confidence interval, 2.0 to 57.5; p= 0.005). Level IV dissection had the highest EI, and level IV metastasis was significantly correlated with overall survival (p=0.012) and recurrence (p=0.001).

Conclusion

CLNM was a significant prognostic factor for ESCC patients and was more common among patients with advanced nodal stages. Level IV exhibited the highest risk of metastasis, and dissection at level IV may be crucial when performing 3FLND, especially in advanced nodal stage disease.

Quality of Life after Open or Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in Patients With Esophageal Cancer-A Systematic Review

Although esophageal cancer is rare in the United States, 5-year survival and quality of life (QoL) are poor following esophageal cancer surgery. Although esophageal cancer has been surgically treated with esophagectomy through thoracotomy, an open procedure, minimally invasive surgical procedures have been recently introduced to decrease the risk of complications and improve QoL after surgery. The current study is a systematic review of the published literature to assess differences in QoL after traditional (open) or minimally invasive esophagectomy. We hypothesized that QoL is consistently better in patients treated with minimally invasive surgery than in those treated with a more traditional and invasive approach. Although global health, social function, and emotional function improved more commonly after minimally invasive surgery compared with open surgery, physical function and role function, as well as symptoms including choking, dysphagia, eating problems, and trouble swallowing saliva, declined for both surgery types. Cognitive function was equivocal across both groups. The potential small benefits in global and mental health status among those who experience minimally invasive surgery should be considered with caution given the possibility of publication and selection bias.

Three-field lymph node dissection in esophageal cancer surgery

Although multidisciplinary treatment has improved the prognosis of esophageal cancer, it is commonly associated with one of the worse prognoses. Since lymph node (LN) metastases can primarily occur from the cervical to the abdominal field, a strategy for extended LN dissection has been established. The three field LN dissection (3FD) during a transthoracic esophagectomy which is defined as a procedure for cervico-thoraco-abdominal LN dissection, was established in the 1980s' in Japan, and is currently widely accepted throughout the world. To date, various comparative trials between 3FD and two field LN dissections (2FD) have been reported and show that a transthoracic esophagectomy with 3FD is superior to 2FD for prognosis. However, in 3FD, postoperative complications, such as recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy and postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction can be induced. Furthermore, there are few prospective trials that have compared between 2FD and 3FD. Therefore, to determine the ideal range of LN dissection, various factors (e.g., location of the primary tumor, disease progression, tumor histology, and perioperative treatment) must be considered. Recently, the efficacy of intense perioperative treatment for esophageal cancer has been reported, and the significance of minimally invasive surgical procedures are being verified. The ideal combination of perioperative treatment and feasible surgery must be established to improve the oncological outcome of esophageal cancer patients further.

Impact of routine recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring in prone esophagectomy with mediastinal lymph node dissection

BACKGROUND

The problem of recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) paralysis (RLNP) after radical esophagectomy remains unresolved. Several studies have confirmed that intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM) of the RLN during thyroid surgery substantially decreases the incidence of RLN damage. This study tried to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of IONM of the RLN during thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position for esophageal cancer.

METHODS

All 108 patients who underwent prone esophagectomy at Tohoku University Hospital between July 2012 and March 2015 were included in this study. We divided patients into two groups: a control group (No-Monitoring group, surgery without IONM; n = 54) and a study group (Monitoring group, surgery with IONM; n = 54). In Monitoring group, neural stimulation was performed for both RLNs before and after dissection in the thoracic procedure, then for RLNs and vagus nerves (VNs) in the cervical procedure. The feasibility of IONM in Monitoring group and early surgical outcomes were retrospectively compared with those in No-Monitoring group.

RESULTS

IONM could be performed for 47 cases (87.0%) in Monitoring group. Reasons for discontinuation were use of muscle relaxants (3 patients), change in thoracotomy procedure (2 patients), past rib bone fracture (1 patient), and allergic shock by transfusion (1 patient). Right RLNPs were identified postoperatively in 4 patients, and left RLNPs in 23 patients. IONM sensitivities were 92.7 and 88.0% for the right and left VNs, respectively. Incidences of postoperative RLNP, aspiration, and primary pneumonia did not differ significantly between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirmed the feasibility and safety of IONM of the RLN for thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position. No significant differences in postoperative outcomes were seen between esophagectomy with and without IONM.

Recurrent laryngeal nerve injury after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: incidence, management, and impact on short- and long-term outcomes

BACKGROUND

Recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury caused by esophagectomy may lead to postoperative morbidity, however data on long-term recovery are scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate the consequences of RLN palsy (RLNP) in terms of pulmonary morbidity and long-term functional recovery.

METHODS

Patients who underwent a 3-stage transthoracic (McKeown) or a transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma in the University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU) between January 2004 and March 2016 were included from a prospective database. Multivariable analyses were conducted to assess the association between RLNP and pulmonary complications and hospital stay. Data regarding long-term recovery were summarized using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Out of the 451 included patients, 47 (10%) were diagnosed with RLNP. Of the patients with RLNP, 34 (7%) had a unilateral lesion, 8 (2%) had a bilateral lesion, and in 5 (1%) the location of the lesion was unknown. The incidence of RLNP was 3/127 (2%) in the transhiatal group, and 44/324 (14%) in the McKeown group. RLNP after McKeown esophagectomy was associated with a higher incidence of pulmonary complications (OR 2.391; 95% CI 1.222-4.679; P=0.011), as well as a longer hospital stay (+4 days) (P=0.001). Of the RLNP patients with more than 6 months follow up almost half recovered fully {median follow-up of 17.5 [7-135] months}. Of the remainder, six required a surgical intervention and the others had residual symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

RLNP after McKeown esophagectomy is associated with an increased pulmonary complication rate, longer hospital stay, and a moderate long-term recovery. Further studies are necessary that examine technologies, which may reduce RLNP incidence and contribute to the early detection and treatment of RLNP.

Circular stapling versus triangulating stapling for the cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Several studies have reported that the triangulating stapling method decreases the incidence of anastomotic stricture after esophagectomy, but no randomized, controlled trial has confirmed the efficacy of the triangulating stapling method for cervical esophagogastrostomy. We compared triangulating stapling and circular stapling for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis regarding the decrease in anastomotic stricture after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer.

METHODS

Between August 2010 and April 2014, 100 patients enrolled in this randomized, controlled trial at the Wakayama Medical University Hospital were allocated randomly to either the circular stapling group (n = 49) or the triangulating stapling group (n = 51). The primary end point was the incidence of anastomotic stricture within 12 months postoperatively. This randomized, controlled trial was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN000004848).

RESULTS

There were no differences between the circular stapling and triangulating stapling groups in terms of clinical data. The amount of time required for esophagogastric anastomosis was slightly greater for the triangulating stapling group (22 minutes) than for the circular stapling group (18 minutes) (P = .028). Anastomotic stricture occurred in 8 patients (17%) in the circular stapling group and 9 patients (19%) in the triangulating stapling group (P = .935). The rate of anastomotic leakage was 11% for the circular stapling group and 2% for the triangulating stapling group (P = .073).

CONCLUSION

The triangulating stapling method for cervical anastomosis for thoracic esophageal cancer does not decrease the incidence of anastomotic stricture compared with the circular stapling method within 12 postoperative months but may affect the rate of anastomotic leakage.

Survival outcomes of 220 consecutive patients with three-staged thoracoscopic esophagectomy

Patients with thoracic esophageal cancer are often treated by minimally invasive esophagectomy. However, the long-term survival benefits of minimally invasive esophagectomy remain unclear. Two approaches are available for thoracoscopic surgery: one with the patient in the left lateral decubitus position (LLDP), and the other with the patient in the prone position (PP). We investigated the survival benefit of thoracoscopic esophagectomy according to the tumor stage and patient position during the thoracoscopic procedure. We reviewed the records of 220 consecutive patients with esophageal cancer treated from 1998 to 2012. In total, 146 and 74 patients were treated with thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the LLDP and PP, respectively. No patients were initially proposed to be candidates for esophagectomy by thoracotomy during the study period. Data collection was performed with a focus on survival and recurrent disease. Among all the 220 patients, the overall 5-year survival rates were 83.7%, 74.1%, 45.5%, 78.6%, 44.2%, 29.4% and 24.3% in the patients with pStage IA, IB, IIA, IIB, IIIA, IIIB and IIIC disease, respectively. Despite the greater number of dissected mediastinal lymph nodes in the PP procedure, there were no significant differences in the survival curves between the LLDP and PP procedures. The long-term results of thoracoscopic esophagectomy are comparable and acceptable. The PP procedure was not confirmed to offer a superior survival benefit to the LLDP procedure in this retrospective study.

Three-field lymph node dissection in treating the esophageal cancer

There are many controversies in lymphadenectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer, and whether 3-field lymphadenectomy or 2-field lymphadenectomy is better have still been in doubt. The aim of this article is to review the role of the lymph node dissection by introducing the merits and demerits in 3-field lymphadenectomy, and the development in lymphadenectomy's selection, treatment and diagnosis. All the literatures related to esophageal lymphadenectomy and minimally invasive surgery (MIE) were searched in PubMed database and the cross references were added and reviewed to complete the reference list. Several researches elucidated that better overall survival (OS) in patients with esophageal cancer after 3-field lymphadenectomy had been reported worldwide, and 3-field lymphadenectomy is more suitable for treating esophageal cancer with cervical and/or upper mediastinal lymph nodes metastasis than 2-field lymphadenectomy regardless of the tumor's histology and location. Many approaches based on the characteristics of esophageal cancer lymph node metastasis are taken to improve the accuracy of 3-field lymphadenectomy and decrease the postoperative morbidity and mortality, while every approach needs further studies to demonstrate its feasibility. The benefits of the recently rapid-developed techniques performed in treating esophageal cancer: the MIE and the robotic-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy are illuminated as well, and both of them are technically safe and feasible for esophageal cancer, whereas further evaluations are still necessary.

Systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures in the surgical treatment of patients with esophageal cancer

Esophageal cancer is currently the eighth most common cancer worldwide. Improvements in operative techniques and neoadjuvant therapies have led to improved outcomes. Resection of the esophagus carries a high risk of severe complications and has a negative impact on health-related quality of life (QOL). The aim of this study was to assess which patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are used to measure QOL after esophagectomy for cancer. A comprehensive search of original articles was conducted investigating QOL after surgery for esophageal carcinoma. Two authors independently selected relevant articles, conducted clinical appraisal, and extracted data (PJ and JS). Out of 5893 articles, 58 studies were included, consisting of 41 prospective and 17 retrospective cohort studies, including a total of 6964 patients. These studies included 11 different PROMs. The existing PROMs could be divided into generic, symptom-specific, and disease-specific questionnaires. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QOL Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ C-30) along with the EORTC QLQ-OESophagus module OES18 was the most widely used; in 42 and 32 studies, respectively. The EORTC and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) questionnaires use an oncological module and an organ-specific module. One validation study was available, which compared the FACT and EORTC, showing moderate to poor correlation between the questionnaires. A great variety of PROMs are being used in the measurement of QOL after surgery for esophageal cancer. A questionnaire with a general module along with a disease-specific module for assessment of QOL of different treatment modalities seem to be the most desirable, such as the EORTC and the FACT with their specific modules (EORTC QLQ-OES18 and FACT-E). Both are developed in different treatment modalities, such as in surgical patients. With regard to reproducibility of current results, the EORTC is recommended.

Comparison of robot-assisted esophagectomy and thoracoscopic esophagectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to compare robot-assisted esophagectomy (RE) with thoracoscopic esophagectomy (TE) for the treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS

A total of 105 patients who underwent RE (n=62) or TE (n=43) due to ESCC were included in this study. Early postoperative outcomes and long-term survivals between the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

The RE and TE groups were comparable in preoperative clinical characteristics. Total operation times were not significantly different between the two groups (490 minutes in RE vs. 458 minutes in TE; P=0.118). The total number of dissected lymph nodes was significantly greater in the RE group (37.3±17.1 vs. 28.7±11.8; P=0.003), and intergroup differences were significant for numbers of lymph nodes dissected from the upper mediastinum (10.7±9.7 in RE vs. 6.3±9.3 in TE; P=0.032) and the abdomen (12.2±8.7 in RE vs. 7.8±7.1 in TE; P=0.007). Five-year overall survival was not different between the two groups (69% in RE and 59% in TE; P=0.737).

CONCLUSIONS

Better quality lymphadenectomy could be achieved in RE although survival benefit was not clear. Prospective randomized studies comparing the RE and TE are necessary.

Surgical anatomy of the supracarinal esophagus based on a minimally invasive approach: vascular and nervous anatomy and technical steps to resection and lymphadenectomy

Background

During esophageal dissection and lymphadenectomy of the upper mediastinum by thoracoscopy in prone position, we observed a complex anatomy in which we had to resect the esophagus, dissect vessels and nerves, and take down some of these in order to perform a complete lymphadenectomy. In order to improve the quality of the dissection and standardization of the procedure, we describe the surgical anatomy and steps involved in this procedure.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated twenty consecutive and unedited videos of thoracoscopic esophageal resections. We recorded the vascular anatomy of the supracarinal esophagus, lymph node stations and the steps taken in this procedure. The resulting concept was validated in a prospective study including five patients.

Results

Seventy percent of patients in the retrospective study had one right bronchial artery (RBA) and two left bronchial arteries (LBA). The RBA was divided at both sides of the esophagus in 18 patients, with preservation of one LBA or at least one esophageal branch in all cases. Both recurrent laryngeal nerves were identified in 18 patients. All patients in the prospective study had one RBA and two LBA, and in four patients the RBA was divided at both sides of the esophagus and preserved one of the LBA. Lymphadenectomy was performed of stations 4R, 4L, 2R and 2L, with a median of 11 resected lymph nodes. Both recurrent laryngeal nerves were identified in four patients. In three patients, only the left recurrent nerve could be identified. Two patients showed palsy of the left recurrent laryngeal nerve, and one showed neuropraxia of the left vocal cord.

Conclusions

Knowledge of the surgical anatomy of the upper mediastinum and its anatomical variations is important for standardization of an adequate esophageal resection and paratracheal lymphadenectomy with preservation of any vascularization of the trachea, bronchi and the recurrent laryngeal nerves.

Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes of Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Paralysis After Esophagectomy for Thoracic Esophageal Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The objectives of this study were to assess the incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis (RLNP) using laryngoscopy after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal carcinoma and to clarify the risk factors influencing postoperative RLNP.

METHODS

A total of 299 patients who underwent laryngoscopic examination after esophagectomy were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who were found to have postoperative RLNP were followed up every 1–3 months, with a median follow-up period of 3 months. Recovery from paralysis was also evaluated on the basis of each affected nerve. Multivariate analyses using logistic regression were used to identify independent risk factors for RLNP. Cumulative recovery rate was calculated using Kaplan–Meier method.

RESULTS

A total of 178 (59.5%) patients were diagnosed with RLNP by first laryngoscopy [bilateral in 59 (33.1%) patients, right in 15 (8.4%), and left in 104 (58.4%)]. In 206 patients who underwent transthoracic and thoracoscopic esophagectomy, independent risk factors for RLNP were lymph node dissection along the right RLN (odds ratio [OR] 3.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06–8.54, P = 0.04) and cervical anastomosis (OR 5.94, 95% CI 1.78–19.80, P < 0.01). Cumulative recovery rate from RLNP was 61.7% at 12 months after esophagectomy with 91 nerves eventually recovering from paralysis. Median recovery time was 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

RLNP developed in 60 % of patients after esophagectomy and may be associated with lymphadenectomy around the right RLN and cervical esophageal mobilization. Although 62% of affected nerves recovered within 12 months, great attention should be given when performing these procedures.

Outcomes of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in prone position with laparoscopic gastric mobilization for esophageal cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of thoracoscopic esophagectomy performed in the prone position (TSE-PP) followed by laparoscopic gastric mobilization (LGM) compared with open thoracotomy and LGM, for esophageal cancers.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of 105 consecutive patients who underwent esophagectomy with LGM for esophageal cancer at Kochi Medical School. Among the study patients, 60 patients underwent TSE-PP, while 45 underwent open thoracotomy (OPEN group). The perioperative outcomes of the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

Compared to the OPEN group, the TSE-PP group had lower blood loss (TSE-PP, 150 mL; OPEN, 430 mL; P < 0.001), longer operative time (TSE-PP, 609 min; OPEN, 570 min; P = 0.012), more lymph nodes dissected around the left recurrent laryngeal nerve (TSE-PP, 6; OPEN, 2; P < 0.001), and a shorter length of hospital stay (TSE-PP, 16.5 days; OPEN, 35 days; P < 0.001). The incidence of postoperative complications was similar in the two groups. Though the recurrence rate and overall survival were not significantly different in the two groups, the TSE-PP group had better overall survival rates than the OPEN group (P = 0.122).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who underwent TSE-PP with LGM for esophageal cancers recovered earlier after surgery compared to those who underwent open thoracotomy with LGM.

Prone position in thoracoscopic esophagectomy improves postoperative oxygenation and reduces pulmonary complications

BACKGROUND

While thoracoscopic esophagectomy is a widely performed surgical procedure, only few studies regarding the influence of body position on changes in circulation and breathing, after the surgery, have been reported. This study aimed at evaluating the effect of body position, during surgery, on the postoperative breathing functions of the chest.

METHODS

A total of 266 patients who underwent right-sided transthoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer from 2004 to 2012 were included in this study. Fifty-four of them underwent open thoracotomies in the left lateral decubitus position (Group O), 108 underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the left lateral decubitus position (Group L) and 104 patients were treated by thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position (Group P). Two patients in Group P, who presented with intra-operative bleeding and underwent thoracotomy, were subsequently excluded from the pulmonary function analysis.

RESULTS

Two patients in Group P had to be changed from the prone position to the lateral decubitus position and underwent thoracotomy in order to control intra-operative bleeding. Despite the significantly longer chest operation period in Group P, total blood loss was significantly lower in this group when compared to Groups O and L. Furthermore, patients in Group P presented with significantly lower water balance during the perioperative period and markedly higher SpO₂/FiO₂ ratio after the surgery. The incidence of respiratory complications was significantly higher in Group O when compared to the other two groups; however, no significant differences were observed between the Groups L and P.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study demonstrate that thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position improves postoperative oxygenation and is therefore a potentially superior surgical approach.

Clinical Significance of Sentinel Node Positivity in Patients with Superficial Esophageal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Sentinel node (SN) mapping in esophageal cancer has been reported to be technically feasible with an acceptable detection rate and accuracy. However, the clinical significance and survival analysis findings associated with the metastatic status of SNs in patients with early-stage esophageal cancer have not been clarified. In this study, we investigated the clinical significance and survival impact of SN mapping in early-stage esophageal cancer.

METHODS

Among patients who were diagnosed preoperatively with clinical T1N0M0 or T2N0M0 esophageal cancer and who underwent SN mapping, 70 consecutive patients who were diagnosed with pathological T1 primary thoracic esophageal cancer were enrolled in this study. Sixty-four (91 %) patients were diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma while 5 (7 %) patients were with adenocarcinoma. Endoscopic injection of technetium-99m tin colloid was performed before surgery, and radioactive SNs were identified by preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative gamma probing. Standard esophagectomy with lymphadenectomy was performed in all patients, and all resected nodes were evaluated by routine pathological examination.

RESULTS

SNs were successfully detected in 65 (92.9 %) of 70 patients with pT1 esophageal cancer. The sensitivity to predict lymph node metastasis was 91.7 %, and the diagnostic accuracy based on SN status was 96.9 %. Although there was a wide distribution of SNs from cervical to abdominal areas, 84.5 % of the patients had no lymph node metastasis or had lymph node metastasis only in SN. The disease-specific survival of the patients with metastatic non-SNs was significantly worse relative to that of the patients with no lymph node metastasis or lymph node metastasis only in SN.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that radio-guided SN mapping is useful not only as an accurate diagnostic tool for detecting lymph node metastasis but also as a tool for prognostic stratification in patients with cN0 early esophageal cancer.

Incidence of and risk factors for venous thromboembolism during surgical treatment for esophageal cancer: a single-institution study

PURPOSE

During the treatment of esophageal cancer with curative intent, patients sometimes experience deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism or a central venous catheter-associated thrombus. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed our new-onset esophageal cancer patients and determined the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE), the location of the thrombus and the risk factors for VTE.

METHODS

One hundred and fifty-three patients undergoing treatment with curative intent were reviewed as candidates. The existence of VTE was assessed from the neck to the pelvis with computed tomography at the initial visit, after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and postoperatively.

RESULTS

Twenty-one VTE events (13.7%) were observed, 16 of which (76.2%) were suggested to be associated with central venous catheterization. When both the pre-therapeutic plasma fibrinogen and C-reactive protein levels were high (≥350 mg/dL and ≥0.2 µg/mL, respectively), the risk of preoperative VTE and overall VTE were significantly higher than normal (p = 0.040, and p = 0.030, respectively). Adenocarcinoma histology and neck lymph node dissection were the independent risk factors that significantly increased the overall risk of VTE (p = 0.015, and p = 0.017, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed that the pre-therapeutic plasma fibrinogen level, C-reactive protein level, adenocarcinoma histology and neck lymph node dissection are the risk factors for venous thromboembolism in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing treatment with curative intent.

The dynamic of nasogastric decompression after esophagectomy and its predictive value of postoperative complications

BACKGROUND

To investigate the regularity and the influence factors of nasogastric decompression volume after esophagectomy, and explore whether the volume of nasogastric decompression can be employed as a predictor for postoperative complications of esophageal carcinoma.

METHODS

Consecutive 247 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent esophagectomy were retrospectively evaluated. The volume of postoperative nasogastric decompression was recorded and the regularity based on it was described. The single and multiple factors regression analysis were used to find out relative factors of the nasogastric decompression volume among the patients without postoperative complication. Gender, age, height, weight, tobacco or alcohol exposure, location of the tumor, histological type, pathological staging, operation time, surgical procedures, anastomotic position and gastric conduit reconstruction were considered as the independent variable. Then, verify the former regression models using the data of patients with postoperative complications.

RESULTS

In trend analysis, the curve estimation revealed a quadratic trend in the relationship between nasogastric decompression volume and postoperative days (R(2) =0.890, P=0.004). The volume of postoperative nasogastric decompression was described by daily drainage (mL) =82.215 + 69.620 × days - 6.604 × days(2). The results of multiple linear stepwise regression analysis showed that gastric conduit reconstruction (β=0.410, P=0.000), smoking (β=-0.231, P=0.000), age (β=-0.193, P=0.001) and histological type of the tumor (β=-0.169, P=0.006) were significantly related to the volume of nasogastric decompression. The average drainage in 5 days after surgery =262.287 + 132.873 × X1 - 72.160 × X2 - 27.904 × X3 - 36.368 × X4 (X1, gastric conduit reconstruction; X2, smoking; X3, histological type; X4, age). The nasogastric decompression of the patients with delayed gastric emptying, and lung infection statistically differ from their predictive values respectively according to the former equation (P<0.01), but the data of anastomotic leakage cases had no significance difference (P=0.344).

CONCLUSIONS

It is found that the volume of postoperative nasogastric decompression presents a quadratic trend based on the days after esophagectomy. Gastric conduit reconstruction, smoking history, age and histological type were independent factors affecting on the volume of postoperative nasogastric decompression. Also, the volume of nasogastric decompression has validity and application value for predicting postoperative complications.

Minimally invasive esophagectomy performed with the patient in a prone position: a systematic review

PURPOSE

We reviewed the surgical results of minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer, performed with the patient in a prone position (MIE-PP), to assess its benefits.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed, and articles that fully described the surgical results of MIE-PP were selected. Parameters such as operative time, blood loss, and postoperative outcomes were compared with those obtained for open transthoracic esophagectomy (OE) and minimally invasive esophagectomy in a lateral decubitus position (MIE-LP).

RESULTS

The conversion rate from MIE-PP to open surgery was very low. MIE-PP was associated with longer operative time and lower blood loss than OE. Although studies from a single institution did not show an apparent difference in morbidity or mortality among the three operative groups, results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial showed a reduction in pulmonary infection and recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy in MIE-PP, compared with OE. The benefits of MIE-PP vs. those of MIE-LP remain controversial.

CONCLUSION

Theoretically, the operative results of MIE-PP might be better than those of MIE-LP for patients with esophageal cancer; however, studies have not yet verified this. Further clinical studies are required to establish whether the advantages of MIE-PP can be translated into clinical outcome.

A novel method for lymphadenectomy along the left laryngeal recurrent nerve during thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Due to limited space in the left upper mediastinum, complete dissection of lymph nodes (LN) along left recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) is difficult. We herein present a novel method for lymphadenectomy along the left RLN during thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the semi-prone position for esophageal carcinoma. The method, suspension the esophagus and push aside trachea, allows en bloc lymphadenectomy along the left RLN from the below aortic arch to the thoracic inlet.

METHODS

Between September 2014 and September 2015, a total of 110 consecutive patients with esophageal carcinoma were treated with thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis in the semi-prone position. Outcomes between those who received surgery with the novel method and conventional surgery were compared.

RESULTS

Fifty patients underwent the novel method and sixty received conventional surgery. The operative field around the left RLN was easier to explore with the novel method. The estimated blood loss was less (23.7±8.2 vs. 34.2±10.3 g, P=0.001), and the number of harvested LNs along the left RLN was greater (6.4±3.2 vs. 4.1±2.8 min, P=0.028) in the novel method group, while the duration of lymphadenectomy along left RLN was longer in the novel method group (28.2±3.9 vs. 20.3±2.8 min, P=0.005). The rate of hoarseness in the novel and conventional groups was 10% and 16.7%, respectively. No significant difference in postoperative morbidity related to the left RLN was noted between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel method during semi-prone esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma is associated with better surgeon ergonomics and operative exposure.

A randomized Phase III trial of thoracoscopic versus open esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG1409

A randomized Phase III study was commenced in May 2015 to confirm the non-inferiority of thoracoscopic esophagectomy to open esophagectomy in terms of overall survival for clinical Stage I-III esophageal cancer. A total of 300 patients will be accrued from Japanese institutions over 6 years. The primary endpoint is overall survival. The secondary endpoints are relapse-free survival, proportion of patients with R0 resection, proportion of patients who underwent re-operation, adverse events, postoperative respiratory function change, postoperative quality-of-life score (EORTC QLQ-C30), and proportion of patients who need conversion from thoracoscopic surgery to open surgery. This trial has been registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000017628.

Comparative analysis of basaloid and conventional squamous cell carcinomas of the esophagus: prognostic relevance of clinicopathological features and protein expression

Basaloid squamous cell carcinoma (BSCC), a variant of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), is a rare and aggressive epithelial malignancy which has been reported in only 0.1-11 % of primary esophageal carcinomas. In this study, a comparison of clinicopathological features and protein expression between esophageal BSCC (EBSCC) and conventional esophageal SCC (ESCC) cases from Brazil was performed in order to find factors that can be relevant to better characterize EBSCC. The expression of HER2, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), Ki-67, and cyclins (A, B1, and D1) in 111 cases (95 ESCC and 16 EBSCC) was evaluated by immunohistochemistry using tissue microarray. When the clinicopathological data were compared, no significant difference was found between the two histological types. Although the difference is not significant (p = 0.055), the EGFR expression was more frequent in the conventional ESCC than in the EBSCC group. Our results indicate that the clinicopathological profiles of conventional ESCC and EBSCC are similar and provide no indicators for differences in prognosis between these two groups.

Recurrence patterns and risk factors following thoracoscopic esophagectomy with radical lymph node dissection for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

The aim of the present study was to clarify the therapeutic effect of thoracoscopic esophagectomy with radical lymph node dissection based on the recurrence pattern, and identify the risk factors for relapse-free survival in patients with esophageal cancer. The recurrence patterns in 140 patients who underwent complete thoracoscopic radical esophagectomy between January 2003 and December 2012 were investigated. The risk factors for recurrence were examined by univariate and multivariate analysis. Mediastinal recurrence in association with initial lymphatic metastasis was precisely analyzed. Esophageal cancer recurred in 49 (35.0%) of the 140 patients. The median recurrence time was 259 (45-2,560) days after the initial treatment. The patterns of initial recurrence among the 140 patients included hematological recurrence in 24 patients (17.1%), lymphatic recurrence in 26 (18.6%), pleural dissemination in 5 (3.6%), peritoneal dissemination in 2 (1.4%), and local recurrence in 4 (2.9%). Lymphatic recurrence within the mediastinal regional lymphatic stations occurred in only 8 (5.7%) of the 140 patients. Univariate analysis for relapse-free survival showed that the statistically significant variables were a tumor location in the upper third of the esophagus, stage of pT3 or pT4, presence of nodal metastasis, pStage of III or IV, presence of a residual tumor, performance of preoperative chemotherapy and performance of postoperative therapy. Multivariate analysis showed that only nodal metastasis and a positive residual tumor were statistically significant independent risk factors for relapse-free survival. Lymphatic recurrence within the mediastinum, particularly the station around the bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerves, was infrequent and independent of the initial metastatic distribution. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy with radical lymph node dissection provides favorable locoregional control. Lymphatic recurrence within the mediastinal regional nodes is infrequent and independent of the initial lymph node metastasis. A pathological residual tumor and lymph node metastasis are significant risk factors for recurrence.

Accuracy of preoperative diagnosis of lymph node metastasis for thoracic esophageal cancer patients from JCOG9907 trial

BACKGROUND

Accurate clinical evaluation of lymph nodes is crucial for selection of the optimum treatment strategy for individual esophageal cancer patients. This study investigated the accuracy of preoperative clinical diagnosis of lymph node metastasis for patients with clinical stage II/III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS

Patients assigned to receive surgery and postoperative chemotherapy in JCOG9907 trial were studied to evaluate the concordance between clinical and pathological nodes. Preoperative diagnosis was based on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS

Among 166 patients in the postoperative group, 160 with sufficient pathological data were studied. The patient background characteristics were: male/female, 147/13; median age, 61 years (range 39-75 years); primary tumor site (upper/middle/lower), 15/76/69; cN0/cN1, 53/107. The sensitivity and specificity of clinical nodes for diagnosis of pathological nodes were 72.7 and 51.3 %, respectively; the positive and negative predictive values were 82.2 and 37.7 %, respectively. The lymph nodes overestimated in the preoperative diagnosis included thoracic paratracheal lymph nodes (#106) (n = 8), middle thoracic paraesophageal lymph nodes (#108) (n = 4), lymph nodes along the lesser curvature (#3) (n = 4), right cardiac lymph nodes (#1) (n = 3), and left cardiac lymph nodes (#2) (n = 2).

CONCLUSION

Diagnosis of clinical nodes has low specificity and low negative predictive value for prediction of pathological node category in the preoperative diagnosis of lymph node metastasis for patients with locally advanced resectable esophageal cancer. Clinical staging techniques must therefore be improved for accurate preoperative diagnosis.

Muscle sparing thoracotomy for esophageal cancer: a comparison with posterolateral thoracotomy

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate whether muscle sparing thoracotomy (MST) improved postoperative chest pain and an impairment of the postoperative pulmonary function in comparison with posterolateral thoracotomy (PLT).

METHODS

Twenty-four patients with esophageal cancer who underwent PLT from September 2006 to August 2008 and 30 patients who underwent MST from September 2008 to August 2010 were selected as subjects of this study. Postoperative acute and chronic chest pain and the recovery of the pulmonary function were retrospectively compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The frequency of the additional use of analgesics was on days 3, 6, and 7 (mean 0.4 vs. 1.2, p = 0.027, 0.4 vs. 1.5, p = 0.007, and 0.2 vs. 1.2, p = 0.009, respectively) in the early postoperative period. The number of patients requiring analgesics at 1 and 3 months after surgery was significantly lower in the MST group than in the PLT group (13.3 vs. 58.3 %, p = 0.002, 10.0 vs. 50.0 %, p = 0.001, respectively). The postoperative vital capacity, expressed as a percentage of the preoperative value, 3 and 12 months after surgery was significantly higher in the MST group than in the PLT group (86.0 vs. 73.8 %, p = 0.028, 93.2 vs. 76.9 %, p = 0.002, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Compared with PLT, MST might, therefore, reduce postoperative chest pain and offer a better recovery of pulmonary function in patients with esophageal cancer.

The Impact of Postoperative Complications on Survivals After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of postoperative complications after esophagectomy on long-term outcome.The treatment of esophageal cancer has recently been improved; however, esophagectomy with thoracotomy and laparotomy carries considerable postoperative morbidity and mortality. The real impact of postoperative complications on overall survival is still under evaluation.A retrospective analysis was performed on patients with esophageal cancer who underwent esophagectomy with thoracotomy and laparotomy, with R0 or R1 resection between January 1997 and December 2012. Of 402 patients, we analyzed the following parameters 284 patients who could be followed up for over 5 years: stage of disease, neoadjuvant therapies, surgical approaches, surgical complications, postoperative medical complications, and overall and relapse-free survivals using medical records.Of the 284 patients, 64 (22.5%) had pneumonia, 55 (19.4%) had anastomotic leakage, and 45 (15.8%) had recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis (RLNP). Pneumonia had a significant negative impact on overall survival (P = 0.035); however, anastomotic leakage and RLNP did not affect overall survival. Multivariate analysis revealed that the presence of pneumonia was predictive of poorer overall survival; the multivariate hazard ratio was 1.456 (95% confidence interval 1.020-2.079, P = 0.039).Pneumonia has a negative impact on overall survival after esophagectomy. Strategies to prevent pneumonia after esophagectomy should improve outcomes in this operation.

Prognostic Factors in Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant 5-Fluorouracil plus Cisplatin for Advanced Esophageal Cancer (JCOG9907)

OBJECTIVE

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil plus cisplatin and subsequent esophagectomy with two- to three-field lymphadenectomy is a standard treatment for patients with clinical stage II/III squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the esophagus. This study investigates the prognostic factors for patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

Of 164 patients assigned to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the JCOG9907 trial, multivariate analyses were performed for 159 and 149 patients to evaluate the preoperative and the combined preoperative and postoperative prognostic factors, respectively.

RESULTS

The multivariate analyses using preoperative factors showed that clinical stage T3 [vs. cT1-2; hazard ratio (HR) 3.60, p = 0.0007] and serum albumin (Alb) <4.0 g/dl (vs. ≥ 4.0 g/dl; HR 2.29, p = 0.0005) were associated with a poor prognosis. Four independent prognostic factors were identified by multivariate analysis of both preoperative and postoperative factors: pathological curability B (pB; R0 with stage IV or pD < pN) or pC [microscopic or macroscopic residual tumor (R1/R2)] [vs. pA (R0); HR 1.93, p = 0.015], pathological stage N1 (vs. pN0; HR 3.86, p = 0.0012), cT3 (vs. cT1-2; HR 2.80, p = 0.0073), and serum Alb <4.0 g/dl (vs. ≥ 4.0 g/dl; HR 2.03, p = 0.0069).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative cT stage, Alb, and postoperative pathological findings are independent prognostic factors for patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced thoracic esophageal SCC. This analysis may aid in stratification according to individual patient risk.