Duodenopancreatic resections in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1

Surgical treatment of non-functioning pancreatic islet cell tumors

Pancreatic endocrine tumors (PETs) are rare neoplasms originating from the amine precursor uptake and decarboxylation (APUD) stem cells. Although the majority of PETs are sporadic, they frequently occur in familial syndromes. PETs may cause a variety of functional syndromes or symptoms of local progression if they are non-functional. General neuroendocrine tumor markers are highly sensitive in the diagnostic assessment of a PET. Imaging studies for tumor localization and staging include computer tomography (CT) scan, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), In(111)-octreotide scan, MIBG, and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). Treatment of PETs often requires a multi-modality approach; however, surgical resection remains the only curative therapy for localized (non-metastatic) disease. Treatment of metastatic disease includes biologic agents, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and liver-directed therapies.

The surgical management of MEN-1 pancreatoduodenal neuroendocrine disease

BACKGROUND

The management of multiple endocrine neoplasia, type 1 (MEN-1) pancreatoduodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) is controversial. An aggressive surgical approach is intended to control the functional syndromes and malignant potential for nodal or distant metastasis.

METHODS

The results of treating 39 patients with MEN-1 pancreatoduodenal NENs over a 35-year period are available from chart reviews and patient interviews. This study focuses on pattern of disease, disease recurrence, and long-term functional outcomes.

RESULTS

Between 1967 and 2003, 39 patients ages 19 to 58 years (mean age, 37) had abdominal operations for their pancreatoduodenal NENs: 26 with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, 4 with hypoglycemia, 3 with both Zollinger-Ellison syndrome and hypoglycemia, and 6 with nonfunctional neoplasms. Fifteen of these 39 patients had malignant disease on initial abdominal operation; 24 of 39 patients have not required abdominal reoperation, 17 of whom have available follow-up data. Of these 17 patients, 11 have biochemical evidence of disease recurrence (increased serum concentrations of gastrin, insulin, or pancreatic polypeptide), while 6 have no biochemical evidence of recurrence. A total of 30 abdominal reoperations were performed in 15 patients; 14 of 15 patients undergoing 1 or more reoperations developed evident malignant disease by their most recent operation. Nine of 13 reoperative patients with follow-up data have evidence of disease recurrence. Functional outcomes available in 20 patients showed that 10 patients require insulin and that 6 require oral hypoglycemic medications. Ninety percent have no abdominal pain or nausea/vomiting, while 4 are unable to return to work secondary to this disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of MEN-1 pancreatoduodenal NENs is met with frequent recurrence and some treatment-related morbidity and mortality. Most patients (22 of 39) eventually demonstrated malignant growth, but, with this strategy, few died of this disease.

Surgery for gastroenteropancreatic tumours in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: review and personal experience

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) tumours develop from the pancreatic islets and from the endocrine cells of the duodenal and gastric mucosa. Even if GEP tumours have generally a benign course, a subgroup of them shows an aggressive behaviour and is a major cause of death amongst MEN1 patients. Diagnosis of insulinoma should lead promptly to pancreatic surgery. MEN1 gastrinomas are multiple and almost exclusively localized in the duodenum. Cure rate for Zollinger-Ellison syndrome in MEN1 is low when surgery is limited to tumour enucleation or full thickness duodenal wall resection. Conversely, pancreatoduodenectomy is followed by higher chance of cure. For nonfunctioning tumours exceeding 1 cm diameter in size a prompt treatment is recommended due to their high malignant potential. Gastroscopic surveillance is indicated for the frequent occurrence of multiple, small, type 2 fundic carcinoids. Endoscopic removal is possible for lesions growing in the mucosa-submucosa, but partial or even total gastrectomy is recommended for the small number of gastric carcinoids infiltrating the muscular layers.

Resolved and unresolved controversies in the surgical management of patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome

OBJECTIVE

Highlight unresolved controversies in the management of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Recent studies have resolved some of the previous controversies including the surgical cure rate in patients with and without Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia-type1 (MEN1), the biological behavior of duodenal and pancreatic gastrinomas, role of imaging studies to localize tumor, and gastrectomy to manage acid output.

METHODS

Review of the literature based on computer searches in Index Medicus, Pubmed and Ovid.

RESULTS

Current controversies as identified in the literature include the role of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), surgery in ZES patients with MEN1, pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple procedure), lymph node primary gastrinoma, parietal cell vagotomy, reoperation and surgery for metastatic tumor, and the use of minimally invasive surgical techniques to localize and remove gastrinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

It is hoped that future studies will focus on these issues to improve the surgical management of ZES patients.

Hereditary pancreatic endocrine tumours

The two main types of hereditary pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours are found in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1) and von Hippel-Lindau disease (VHL), but also in the rarer disorders of neurofibromatosis type 1 and tuberous sclerosis. This review considers the major advances that have been made in genetic diagnosis, tumour localization, medical and surgical treatment and palliation with systemic chemotherapy and radionuclides. With the exception of the insulinoma syndrome, all of the various hormone excess syndromes of MEN-1 can be treated medically. The role of surgery however remains controversial ranging from no intervention (except enucleation for insulinoma), intervening for tumours diagnosed only by biochemical criteria, intervening in those tumours only detected radiologically (1-2 cm in diameter) or intervening only if the tumour diameter is > 3 cm in diameter. The extent of surgery is also controversial, although radical lymphadenectomy is generally recommended. Pancreatic tumours associated with VHL are usually non-functioning and tumours of at least 2 cm in diameter should be resected. Practice guidelines recommend that screening in patients with MEN-1 should commence at the age of 5 years for insulinoma and at the age of 20 years for other pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours and variously at 10-20 years of age for pancreatic tumours in patients with VHL. The evidence is increasing that the life span of patients may be significantly improved with surgical intervention, mandating the widespread use of tumour surveillance and multidisciplinary team management.

Unusual presentation of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 in a young woman with a novel mutation of the MEN1 gene

We report an unusual presentation of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN 1) in a young woman who was subsequently proven to have a novel mutation of the MEN1 gene. The young patient, aged 25 years, was investigated for abdominal discomfort and left upper abdominal pain. Her family history was unremarkable, except an unknown disorder of her father causing early death. Abdominal ultrasonography (USG) and computed tomography revealed a giant pancreatic tumor measuring 10 cm in diameter. The diagnosis of a clinically nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor was established by clinical and other studies, including USG-guided aspiration biopsy and octreotide scintigraphy, and the patient underwent a distal pancreatectomy. Histology proved a well-differentiated multinodular neuroendocrine tumor of the pancreas. During surgery, a subcutaneous lipoma was also removed from the abdominal wall. Two years later, the patient developed primary hyperparathyroidism, and two enlarged parathyroid glands were surgically removed. Magnetic resonance imaging of the pituitary gland was normal. Screening for MEN1 gene mutation by temperature gradient gel electrophoresis revealed heterozygosities in exons 3, 8, and 9, while direct sequencing indicated a novel germline mutation (C354X) resulting in a stop codon in exon 8 and polymorphisms in exon 3 (R171Q) and exon 9 (D418D and L432L). Genetic screening revealed no mutation in living family members. Our unusual case suggests that a multinodular pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor in a young patient may justify screening for MEN 1 syndrome, even in the absence of other endocrinopathy or family history.

Clinical genetic testing and early surgical intervention in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN 1)

OBJECTIVE

We sought to develop a comprehensive program for clinical genetic testing in a large group of extended families with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN 1), with the ultimate aim of early tumor detection and surgical intervention.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Germline mutations in the MEN1 tumor suppressor gene are responsible for the MEN 1 syndrome. Direct genetic testing for a disease-associated MEN1 mutation is now possible in selected families. The neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas/duodenum and the intrathoracic neuroendocrine tumors that occur in MEN 1 carry a malignant potential. Importantly, these tumors arise in otherwise young healthy patients and are complicated by the potential for multifocality and involvement of multiple target tissues. The optimal screening methods and indications for early surgical intervention in genetically positive patients have yet to be defined.

METHODS

Nine MEN 1 kindreds were included in the study. The mutations for each kindred were initially identified in the research laboratory. Subsequently, mutation detection was independently validated in the clinical Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory. Each patient in the study underwent formal genetic counseling before testing.

RESULTS

Genetic testing was performed in 56 at-risk patients. Patients were stratified according to risk: Group I (n = 25), 50% risk, younger than 30 years old; Group II (n = 20), 50% risk, 30 years old or older; Group III (n = 11) 25% risk. Seven patients (age, 12 to 42 years; mean, 20.6 +/- 3.8 years) had a positive genetic test. Patients with a novel positive genetic test were in either Group I (n = 6) or Group II (n = 1) and have been followed for 35.8 +/- 2.0 months. Of the 7 genetically positive patients, hypercalcemia was either present at the time of diagnosis or developed during the period of follow-up in 6 patients. Four patients have undergone parathyroidectomy as early as age 16 years. One genetically positive patient has not yet developed hyperparathyroidism. Intensive biochemical screening in this select group of patients identified an elevated pancreatic polypeptide level and pancreatic tail mass lesion in a 15-year-old male who is asymptomatic and currently normocalcemic.

CONCLUSIONS

Genetic testing identifies patients harboring an MEN1 mutation before the development of clinical signs or symptoms of endocrine disease. When genetically positive patients are carefully studied prospectively, biochemical evidence of neoplasia can be detected an average of 10 years before clinically evident disease, allowing for early surgical intervention. Genetically positive individuals should undergo focused cancer surveillance for early detection of the potentially malignant neuroendocrine tumors that account for most of the disease-related morbidity and mortality.

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: duodenopancreatic tumors

Duodenopancreatic endocrine tumors are the most frequently lethal part of MEN-1. The management of these patients is complicated by the variable hormonal function of the tumors, and the often indolent but occasionally lethal nature of the tumors. This article reviews our current approach to the diagnosis, surveillance and management of these patients.

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: duodenopancreatic tumours

The pancreaticoduodenal disease in Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is the most frequent cause of death due to the syndrome, and the most controversial with regard to its management. This article discusses the current data and recommendations with respect to disease screening, functional tumour diagnosis, natural history, preoperative imaging, operative strategy and follow-up.

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: fresh perspective on clinical features and penetrance

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1) is an interesting genetic syndrome of polyendocrinopathies. Clinical knowledge about MEN-1 is essential as it appears to be significantly under-diagnosed. New data from several prospective series shows not only that as a many as 40% of patients manifest a first feature of MEN-1 after age 40, but also that as many as a third of gene carriers do not present with hyperparathyroidism as the first feature, as previously believed. Mutational analysis for frequently involved exons of the gene menin on chromosome 11 is now available, but negative results should be interpreted with caution in patients with clinical MEN-1. Disease-specific mortality is significant, arises largely from pancreatic islet carcinoma and malignant thymic carcinoid, and renders this disorder worthy of careful and early prospective diagnosis and treatment.

Comparison of surgical results in patients with advanced and limited disease with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To determine the role of surgery in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) with either limited or advanced pancreatic endocrine tumors (PETs).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The role of surgery in patients with MEN1 and ZES is controversial. There have been numerous previous studies of surgery in patients with PETs; however, there are no prospective studies on the results of surgery in patients with advanced disease.

METHODS

Eighty-one consecutive patients with MEN1 and ZES were assigned to one of four groups depending on the results of imaging studies. Group 1 (n = 17) (all PETs smaller than 2.5 cm) and group 3 (n = 8) (diffuse liver metastases) did not undergo surgery. All patients in group 2A (n = 17; single PET 2.5-6 cm [limited disease]) and group 2B (n = 31; two or more lesions, 2.5 cm in diameter or larger, or one lesion larger than 6 cm) underwent laparotomy. Tumors were preferably removed by simple enucleation, or if not feasible resection. Patients were reevaluated yearly.

RESULTS

Pancreatic endocrine tumors were found in all patients at surgery, with groups 2A and 2B having 1.7 +/- 0.4 and 4.8 +/- 1 PETs, respectively. Further, 35% of the patients in group 2A and 88% of the patients in group 2B had multiple PETs, 53% and 84% had a pancreatic PET, 53% and 68% had a duodenal gastrinoma, 65% and 71% had lymph node metastases, and 0% and 12% had liver metastases. Of the patients in groups 2A and 2B, 24% and 58% had a distal pancreatectomy, 0% and 13% had a hepatic resection, 0% and 6% had a Whipple operation, and 53% and 68% had a duodenal resection. No patient was cured at 5 years. There were no deaths. The early complication rate, 29%, was similar for groups 2A and 2B. Mean follow-up from surgery was 6.9 +/- 0.8 years, and during follow-up liver metastases developed in 6% of the patients in groups 2A and 2B. Groups 1, 2A, and 2B had similar 15-year survival rates (89-100%); they were significantly better than the survival rate for group 3 (52%).

CONCLUSIONS

Almost 40% of patients with MEN1 and ZES have advanced disease without diffuse distant metastases. Despite multiple primaries and a 70% incidence of lymph node metastases, tumor can be removed with no deaths and complication rates similar to those in patients with limited disease. Further, despite previous studies showing that patients with advanced disease have decreased survival rates, in this study the patients with advanced tumor who underwent surgical resection had the same survival as patients with limited disease and patients without identifiable tumor. This suggests that surgical resection should be performed in patients with MEN1 who have ZES and advanced localized PET.

Pancreatic endocrine tumors

Pancreatic endocrine tumors are rare but have long held a fascination for clinicians because of the physiologic derangements that they can cause, and the dramatic corrections that can be achieved by appropriate management. In the year reviewed in this article, the literature again demonstrated the ongoing interest and research in this area. In particular, the areas of gastrinoma, insulinoma, and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 have received careful attention.