Pharmacokinetics and safety of amprenavir and ritonavir following multiple-dose, co-administration to healthy volunteers

Amprenavir inhibitory quotient and virological response in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients on an amprenavir-containing salvage regimen without or with ritonavir

The efficacy of an amprenavir (APV)-containing therapy without (group A) or with (group B) ritonavir was assessed in patients with failure of previous protease inhibitor therapy for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. The mean minimal plasma APV concentrations in groups A and B were 58 and 1,320 ng/ml, respectively, corresponding to APV inhibitory quotients of 0.2 (range, 0.03 to 0.70) and 7.0 (range, 1.4 to 145), respectively. At week 24, 2 of 8 and 13 of 14 patients in groups A and B, respectively, had <200 HIV RNA copies/ml of plasma, including 4 of 5 patients infected with APV-resistant viruses.

Clinical pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of amprenavir

OBJECTIVE

To review the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, drug interactions, and dosage and administration information of amprenavir.

DATA SOURCE

An extensive review of the literature (MEDLINE search from 1994 to April 2001) relating to the clinical pharmacology of the HIV protease inhibitors was conducted. Meeting abstracts or full presentations and data submitted to the Food and Drug Administration were also reviewed.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

The data on pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, drug interactions, and drug resistance were obtained from in vitro studies and open-label and controlled clinical trials.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Like all HIV protease inhibitors, amprenavir interrupts the maturation phase of the HIV replicative cycle by forming an inhibitor-enzyme complex, which prevents HIV protease from binding with its normal substrates (biologically inactive viral polyproteins). Amprenavir has an enzyme inhibition constant (Ki = 0.6 nM) that falls within the Ki range of the other protease inhibitors. Amprenavir's in vitro 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) against wild-type clinical HIV isolates is 14.6 +/- 12.5 ng/mL (mean +/- SD). Pharmacodynamic modeling indicates that, as is the case with other protease inhibitors, the concentration-response curve for amprenavir plateaus at amprenavir trough values above the IC50 for these isolates. This exposure-activity relationship, plus such favorable pharmacokinetic parameters as a long terminal elimination half-life (7-10 h), makes amprenavir an attractive drug of choice when considering potent antiretrovirals. The higher trough exposure obtained with amprenavir coadministered with ritonavir may allow effective treatment of patients with decreased susceptibility viral isolates and once-daily dosing. Amprenavir has been approved for adults and children; the recommended capsule doses are 1200 mg twice daily for adults and 20 mg/kg twice daily or 15 mg/kg 3 times daily for children < 13 years of age or adolescents < 50 kg. The recommended dose for amprenavir oral solution is 1.5 mL/kg twice daily or 1.1 mL/kg 3 times daily.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical pharmacology, exposure-activity relationship, and drug resistance profile of amprenavir support the use of this potent HIV protease inhibitor in combination antiretroviral regimens, especially for persons who have experienced virologic failure while on protease inhibitor-containing regimens.

Pharmacokinetic study of human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitors used in combination with amprenavir

In an open-label, randomized, multicenter, multiple-dose pharmacokinetic study, we determined the steady-state pharmacokinetics of amprenavir with and without coadministration of indinavir, nelfinavir, or saquinavir soft gel formulation in 31 human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected subjects. The results indicated that amprenavir plasma concentrations were decreased by saquinavir soft gel capsule (by 32% for area under the concentration-time curve at steady state [AUC(ss)] and 37% for peak plasma concentration at steady state [C(max,ss)]) and increased by indinavir (33% for AUC(ss)). Nelfinavir significantly increased amprenavir minimum drug concentration at steady state (by 189%) but did not affect amprenavir AUC(ss) or C(max,ss). Nelfinavir and saquinavir steady-state pharmacokinetics were unchanged by coadministration with amprenavir compared with the historical monotherapy data. Concentrations of indinavir, coadministered with amprenavir, in plasma decreased in both single-dose and steady-state evaluations. The changes in amprenavir steady-state pharmacokinetic parameters, relative to those for amprenavir alone, were not consistent among protease inhibitors, nor were the changes consistent with potential interactions in CYP3A4 metabolism or P-glycoprotein transport. No dose adjustment of either protease inhibitor in any of the combinations studied is needed.