Sedation, analgesia, and neuromuscular blockade of the critically ill adult: revised clinical practice guidelines for 2002

Actigraphy in the Critically Ill: Correlation With Activity, Agitation, and Sedation

Objectives To determine the feasibility of continuous measurement of limb movement via wrist and ankle actigraphy (an activity measure) in critically ill patients and to compare actigraphy measurements with observed activity, subjective scores on sedation-agitation scales, and heart rate and blood pressure of patients.

• Methods In a prospective, descriptive, correlational study, all activity of 20 adult patients in medical and coronary care units in a university medical center were observed for 2 hours and documented. Wrist and ankle actigraphy, heart rate, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure data were collected every minute. The Comfort Scale and the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale were completed at the beginning of the observation period and 1 and 2 hours later.

•Results Wrist actigraphy data correlated with scores on the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (r = 0.58) and the Comfort Scale (r = 0.62) and with observed stimulation and activity events of patients (r = 0.45). Correlations with systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures were weaker. Wrist and ankle actigraphy data were significantly correlated (r = 0.69; P < .001); however, their mean values (wrist, 418; ankle, 147) were significantly different (t = 5.77; P < .001).

• Conclusions Actigraphy provides a continuous recording of patients’ limb movement. Actigraphy measurements correlate well with patients’ observed activity and with subjective scores on agitation and sedation scales. Actigraphy may become particularly important as a continuous measurement of activity for use in behavioral research and may enhance early recognition and management of the excessive activity that characterizes agitation.

Bispectral Index monitoring correlates with sedation scales in brain-injured patients*

OBJECTIVE

Monitoring critically ill, brain-injured patients with a decreased level of consciousness is challenging. Our goal is to determine in this population the correlation between the Bispectral Index (BIS) and three commonly used sedation agitation scales: the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS), the Sedation-Agitation Scale (SAS) and the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores.

DESIGN

Prospective, single-blinded observational study.

SETTING

Eight-bed neurology-neurosurgery intensive care unit at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation.

PATIENTS

Thirty critically ill patients admitted to the neurointensive care unit with primary brain injury and a decreased level of consciousness.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Patients were prospectively evaluated for level of consciousness using the RASS, SAS, and GCS every hour and simultaneously were monitored continuously with a BIS monitor for 6 hrs. A Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to correlate the BIS scores with clinical scales. In 15 patients monitored with the newer BIS XP version, the BIS values correlated significantly with the RASS (R2 = .810; p < .0001), SAS (R2 = .725; p < .0001), and GCS (R2 = .655; p < .0001). In 15 patients monitored with the older BIS 2.1.1 software, the correlation was as follows: for RASS, R2 = .30 (p < .008), for SAS: R2 = .376 (p < .001), and for GCS: R2 = .274 (p < .015). This correlation was maintained in patients who received sedative medications.

CONCLUSIONS

A statistically significant correlation existed between BIS values and the RASS, SAS, and GCS scores in critically ill brain-injured patients, with and without sedation. The newer BIS XP software package may be a useful adjunctive tool in objective assessment of level of consciousness in brain-injured patients.

Sedation, analgesia, and neuromuscular blockade in the pediatric intensive care unit: survey of fellowship training programs

OBJECTIVE

To survey current sedation, analgesia, and neuromuscular blockade practices in pediatric critical care fellowship training programs in the United States.

DESIGN

Questionnaire survey sent by all program directors. The survey could be submitted either via a Web site, fax, or mail.

SETTING

University school of medicine.

SUBJECTS

Fifty-nine pediatric critical care fellowship training program directors in the United States, listed on the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Web site.

INTERVENTIONS

Survey.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The response rate was 59.3% (35 questionnaires). Midazolam, lorazepam, morphine, and fentanyl are the most frequently used drugs in pediatric intensive care units for analgesia and sedation. Most pediatric intensive care units surveyed have a written sedation policy (66%). The majority of units responding to the survey (85.7%) routinely use a scoring system to assess agitation and pain in children, with the most common being the COMFORT score. All of the pediatric intensive care units surveyed reported weaning drugs slowly to try to prevent drug withdrawal. Movement disorders related to prolonged sedation and analgesia seem to be more common than is reported in the literature, with 65.7% of units reporting cases. There is good consensus on the indications for neuromuscular blockade, with vecuronium being the most popular drug.

CONCLUSIONS

When compared with a similar survey from 1989, this survey suggests that pediatric critical care units with fellowship training programs have made some changes in their approach to sedation and analgesia over the past decade. More fellowship directors report the use of sedation protocols and better recognition, prevention, and management of drug withdrawal. Similar analgesic, sedative, and neuromuscular blocking drugs are being used but some more commonly than a decade ago.

Pain management in the intensive care unit

Pain management is an essential component of quality care delivery for the critically ill patient. Because outcomes are difficult to predict in the intensive care unit (ICU), high-quality pain management and palliative therapy should be a goal for every patient. For those patients actively dying, palliation may be among the main benefits offered by the health care team. Appropriate palliation of pain begins with the use of effective strategies for recognizing, evaluating,and monitoring pain. Skill in pain management requires knowledge of both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapies. This article focuses on expertise in the use of opiates to facilitate confident and appropriate pain therapy. To optimize palliative therapy, symptoms are best addressed by interdisciplinary care teams guided by models that acknowledge a continuum of curative therapies and palliative care.

Abdominal muscle action during expiration can impair pressure controlled ventilation

Pressure controlled ventilation, and pressure support for spontaneous breathing are often used in intensive care because coordination of the ventilator with patient efforts can improve comfort and possibly reduce sedation. However we report a series of 10 patients whose efforts did not synchronise with pressure controlled ventilation. This was incorrectly diagnosed as inadequate sedation, and treated with increased sedation or muscle paralysis. Better recognition of this condition showed that slow respiratory rates and increased abdominal muscle action during expiration can affect pressure-controlled ventilation and pressure assisted breathing. If the condition is not recognised, treatment for poor synchronisation may delay weaning or be inappropriate.

Management of sedation in mechanically ventilated patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There are many new and exciting studies in the sedation literature. Recent studies of new scoring systems to monitor sedation, new medications, and new insights into post-intensive care unit (ICU) sequelae have brought about interesting ideas for achieving an adequate level of sedation of our patients while minimizing complications.

RECENT FINDINGS

The recent literature focuses on monitoring the level of a patient's sedation with new bedside clinical scoring systems and new technology. Outcomes studies have highlighted problems with both inadequate sedation and excessive sedation in regard to patients' post-ICU psychological health. More insight into drug withdrawal and addiction as complications of ICU care were examined. A new medication for sedation in the ICU has been approved for use, but its role is not yet defined.

SUMMARY

Many patients in the ICU receive mechanical ventilation and will require sedative medications. A frequently overlooked cause of agitation in the ventilated patient is pain, and assessing the adequacy of analgesia is an important part of the continuous assessment of a patient. The goal of sedation is to provide relief while minimizing the development of drug dependency and oversedation. Careful monitoring with bedside scoring systems, the appropriate use of medications, and a strategy of daily interruption can lead to diminished time on the ventilator and in the ICU.

Delirium in the intensive care unit

Delirium in the intensive care unit (ICU) is a complex, common, and problematic condition that interferes with healing and recovery. It leads to higher morbidity and mortality and extended hospital stays. The aging population older than 65, and more likely to develop delirium, is the fastest growing population in the United States and is increasingly seen in the ICU. Delirium is often unrecognized and misdiagnosed, which leads to mistreatment or lack of appropriate treatment. This article discusses the definition of delirium, pathogenesis, clinical practice guidelines, newer assessment tools for ICU, and nursing interventions directed toward prevention and early identification of delirium.

How reliable is the Bispectral Index in critically ill patients? A prospective, comparative, single-blinded observer study

OBJECTIVE

To establish a correlation between a reliable subjective measure, the Sedation-Agitation Scale (SAS), and an objective tool, the Bispectral Index (BIS), for monitoring critically ill patients with a decreased level of consciousness.

DESIGN

Prospective, comparative, single-blinded observer study.

SETTING

Surgical and medical intensive care units of the Tufts-New England Medical Center, a 349-bed tertiary care, academic medical center.

PATIENTS

A convenience sample of 20 adult, critically ill patients with a decreased level of consciousness. The data from one patient were excluded because the patient did not meet inclusion criteria.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Patients were prospectively evaluated by a blinded observer using the SAS to subjectively determine their level of consciousness. Sedation levels varied from unarousable (SAS score of 1), to very sedated (SAS score of 2), to mildly sedated (SAS score of 3). Simultaneously, the patients were continuously monitored for 4-6 hrs with the BIS device. There was wide variability in BIS scores for any given level of consciousness as compared with the SAS. Unarousable patients had BIS scores ranging from 23 to 97, with a median score of 50 and an interquartile range of 24. Very sedated patients had BIS scores ranging from 35 to 98, with a median score of 68 and an interquartile range of 36. Mildly sedated patients had BIS scores ranging from 67 to 91, with a median score of 76 and an interquartile range of 8. Overall, there was a less than satisfactory correlation between BIS values and SAS scores (r =.36, p <.001). However, the correlation improved with subgroup analysis when BIS values associated with excessive muscle movement were excluded (r =.50, p <.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The correlation between SAS and BIS scores was suboptimal and inconsistent in a heterogeneous group of critically ill patients. The generation of BIS hardware and software, studied herein, is neither reliable nor valid for routinely monitoring the level of consciousness in the critically ill patient. Excessive muscle movement by the patient is an important and spurious influence on BIS values and seriously undermines BIS reliability.

Multidisciplinary care of the obese patient with chronic critical illness after surgery

The surgical patient with prolonged critical illness usually has a higher severity of illness on ICU admission, and is destined for greater morbidity, debilitation, and poorer hospital and long-term survival. Care of those with obesity is particularly difficult. Only with meticulous attention to detail and refined, dedicated, multidisciplinary processes of care, preferably assisted by protocolization, can these patients sustain any hope of recovery to acceptable functionality.