Infusion versus bolus of an ultrasound contrast agent: in vivo dose-response measurements of BR1

A review of contrast media research in 1999-2000

Contrast media research published during the years 1999 and 2000 is reviewed in this article, in terms of relevance to developments within the field of diagnostic radiology. The primary focus is on publications from the journal Investigative Radiology, which publishes much of the clinical and laboratory research performed in this field. The journals Radiology and the American Journal of Roentgenology are dominant in the field of diagnostic radiology and together publish more than 10 times the number of articles as appear each year in Investigative Radiology. However, in 1999 for example, these two journals together published fewer articles than did Investigative Radiology alone that concerned basic (animal) research with contrast media. Thirty-six percent of the articles in Investigative Radiology in 1999 had a primary focus on contrast media and 18% on basic (animal) research with contrast media. To make this review more complete, articles from other major journals are cited and discussed, as needed, to provide supplemental information in the few areas not well covered by articles in Investigative Radiology. The safety of contrast media is always an important topic and research continues to be performed in this area, both to explore fundamental issues regarding iodinated contrast media and also to establish the overall safety profile of new magnetic resonance (MR) and ultrasound agents. In regard to preclinical investigations, most of the work performed in the last 2 years has been with MR and ultrasound. In MR, research efforts continue to be focused on the development of targeted agents. In ultrasound, research efforts are split between studies looking at new imaging methods and early studies of targeted agents. In regard to the clinical application of contrast media, the published literature continues to be dominated by MR. Investigations include the study of disease in clinical trials and in animal models. A large number of studies continue to be published in regard to new techniques and applications within the field of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography. This field represents the single, largest new clinical application of contrast media in MR to emerge in the last decade. New clinical research continues to be published regarding the use of contrast media in computed tomography (CT), ultrasound, and x-ray angiography. The introduction of spiral CT (together with the multidetector scanners) has led to greater utilization of this modality, as well as intravenous iodinated contrast media. The number of publications regarding clinical applications of intravenously injected ultrasound contrast agents remains low, with the high expectations in regard to growth (in terms of number of exams using contrast) of the last decade yet to be fulfilled.

Clinical safety of SonoVue, a new contrast agent for ultrasound imaging, in healthy volunteers and in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety profile of SonoVue, a new echo-contrast agent based on stabilized sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) microbubbles, in healthy volunteers and in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

METHODS

Safety and tolerability of SonoVue were evaluated in 66 healthy volunteers during two placebo-controlled phase I studies (a single intravenous ascending-dose study in 36 volunteers given SonoVue doses of 0.003 to 0.12 mL/kg and a multiple-dose study in 30 subjects given cumulative doses of 0.15 to 0.6 mL/kg) and in 12 patients with COPD of various degrees of clinical severity, who were given SonoVue at a dosage of 4 mL (corresponding to 0.057 mL/kg in a 70-kg patient). Adverse events were monitored up to 48 to 72 hours after administration. All volunteers underwent extensive safety assessments (monitoring of vital signs, electrocardiogram, blood oxygen saturation, laboratory assessments, and Mini-Mental test) up to 24 to 72 hours after administration. In addition, patients with COPD underwent specific lung function tests, such as forced expiratory volume, forced vital capacity, and forced midexpiratory flow.

RESULTS

No serious adverse events occurred throughout the study. All nonserious adverse events were minor, mild, and rapidly self-resolving. No difference in the incidence of adverse events was observed among the various dosages of SonoVue and between SonoVue and placebo. There were no clinically significant changes in any of the safety assessments. No statistically significant differences between SonoVue and placebo were observed in mean forced expiratory volume, forced vital capacity, or forced midexpiratory flow levels. No substantial changes from baseline in blood oxygen saturation were observed for either study agent at any postinjection time point.

CONCLUSIONS

SonoVue showed a good safety profile both in healthy subjects and in patients with COPD.