Ultrasound evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma: program implementation, initial experience, and learning curve

Portable ultrasound in pre-hospital emergencies: a feasibility study

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound plays a central role in the evaluation of both trauma and medical emergencies. The development of portable sonography devices could extent its application into the pre-hospital arena. The aim of our study was to evaluate feasibility of pre-hospital ultrasound in the Norwegian Air Rescue setting.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

During a 3-month period, we conducted a prospective study using sonography in pre-hospital patient management. All examinations were carried out by the same ultrasound-certified physician using a Primedic Handyscan in a standardized focused protocol for abdominal and lung sonography and a subcostal 2-chamber long axis view. Inclusion criteria were abdominal/thoracic and obstetric trauma, circulatory/respiratory compromise, pulseless electric activity (PEA) in cardiac arrest, acute abdomen and monitoring during transport. Allowed examination time was restricted to 3 min on the scene. The patient's gender, age, symptoms, trauma mechanism, quality of visualization and diagnose made were recorded. Pre-hospital results were compared with in-hospital findings.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients were entered into the study. Three patients had to be excluded due to technical difficulties. Nineteen medical, 15 traumas and 1 obstetric patient were included. Good visualization was obtained in 74% (n= 26), moderate in 26% (n = 9). Median examination time was 2.5 min (range 1-3 min). Nine patients (26%) showed positive sonography findings. Sensitivity was 90%, specificity 96%. Diagnostic usefulness was high in undetermined cardiac arrest and hypotension and massive hematoperitoneum.

CONCLUSION

Pre-hospital ultrasound when applied by an proficient examiner using a goal-directed, time sensitive protocol is feasible, does not delay patient management and provides diagnostic and therapeutic benefit. Further studies are warranted to identify the exact indications and role of pre-hospital sonography.

Randomized controlled clinical trial of point-of-care, limited ultrasonography for trauma in the emergency department: the first sonography outcomes assessment program trial

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Annually, 38 million people are evaluated for trauma, the leading cause of death in persons younger than 45 years. The primary objective is to assess whether using a protocol inclusive of point-of-care, limited ultrasonography (PLUS), compared to usual care (control), among patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with suspected torso trauma decreased time to operative care.

METHODS

The study was a randomized controlled clinical trial conducted during a 6-month period at 2 Level I trauma centers. The intervention was PLUS conducted by verified clinician sonographers. The primary outcome measure was time from ED arrival to transfer to operative care; secondary outcomes included computed tomography (CT) use, length of stay, complications, and charges. Regression models controlled for confounders and analyzed physician-to-physician variability. All analyses were conducted on an intention-to-treat basis. Results are presented as mean, first-quartile, median, and third-quartile, with multiplicative change and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), or percentage with odds ratio and 95% CIs.

RESULTS

Four hundred forty-four patients with suspected torso trauma were eligible; 136 patients lacked consent, and attending physicians refused enrollment of 46 patients. Two hundred sixty-two patients were enrolled: 135 PLUS patients and 127 controls. There were no important differences between groups. Time to operative care was 64% (48, 76) less for PLUS compared to control patients. PLUS patients underwent fewer CTs (odds ratio 0.16) (0.07, 0.32), spent 27% (1, 46) fewer days in hospital, and had fewer complications (odds ratio 0.16) (0.07, 0.32), and charges were 35% (19, 48) less compared to control.

CONCLUSION

A PLUS-inclusive protocol significantly decreased time to operative care in patients with suspected torso trauma, with improved resource use and lower charges.

Blunt trauma to the spleen: ultrasonographic findings

The spleen is the most frequently injured organ in adults who sustain blunt abdominal trauma. Splenic trauma accounts for approximately 25% to 30% of all intra-abdominal injuries. The management of splenic injury has undergone rapid change over the last decade, with increasing emphasis on splenic salvage and non-operative management. Identifying the presence and degree of splenic injury is critical in triaging the management of patients. Imaging is integral in the identification of splenic injuries, both at the time of injury and during follow-up. Although CT remains the gold standard in blunt abdominal trauma, US continues to play an important role in assessing the traumatized spleen. This pictorial review illustrates the various ultrasonographic appearances of the traumatized spleen. Correlation with other imaging is presented and complications that occur during follow-up are described.

Prospective evaluation of non-radiologist performed emergency abdominal ultrasound for haemoperitoneum

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate non-radiologist performed emergency ultrasound for the detection of haemoperitoneum after abdominal trauma in a British accident and emergency department.

METHODS

Focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) was performed during the primary survey on adult patients triaged to the resuscitation room with suspected abdominal injury over a 12 month period. All investigations were performed by one of three non-radiologists trained in FAST. The ultrasound findings were compared against the investigation of choice of the attending surgeon/accident and emergency physician. The patients were followed up for clinically significant events until hospital discharge or death.

RESULTS

One hundred patients who had sustained blunt abdominal trauma, were evaluated by FAST. Nine true positive scans were detected and confirmed by computed tomography, diagnostic peritoneal lavage, or laparotomy. There was one false positive in this group, giving a sensitivity of 100%, specificity 99%, and positive predictive value of 90%. Ten patients with penetrating injuries were evaluated with a sensitivity and specificity for FAST of 33% and 86% respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Emergency torso ultrasound for the detection of haemoperitoneum can be successfully performed by trained non-radiologists within a British accident and emergency system. It is an accurate and rapid investigation for blunt trauma, but the results should be interpreted with caution in penetrating injury.

Tree stand falls: a persistent cause of sports injury

OBJECTIVE

Tree stand falls are a well-known cause of hunting-related injury. Spine and brain injuries associated with these falls result in a significant incidence of permanent disability. Prior studies indicate that hunting tree stand injuries are largely preventable with the proper use of safety belts; however, compliance with safety belt use is variable. The purposes of this study were to determine 1) current compliance with safety belt use, 2) alterations in the spectrum of injury, and 3) causes of the falls.

METHODS

From January 1996 to October 2001, 51 tree stand-related injuries referred to either of two regional trauma centers or their region's medical examiner's office were reviewed. Data had been recorded in each hospital's trauma registry, and the registries were searched for falls. Medical records were reviewed for additional data retrospectively, with an emphasis on determining the use of safety belts, and mechanisms contributing to the fall.

RESULTS

Fifty-one cases of tree stand-associated injuries were identified. These injuries all occurred in men, with a mean age of 42.6 years (range, 22-69 years). Alcohol use was present in 10% of patients and in two of the three deaths. The mean Injury Severity Score was 18.1 (range, 2-75). The most common injuries were spinal fractures (51% of series) and extremity fractures (41% of series). Closed head injuries were identified in 24% and lung injuries were identified in 22% of patients. Abdominal visceral injuries were present in 8% and genitourinary injuries were present in 4%. Three patients died. In addition to injury from the fall, a significant number (six patients [12%]) had additional morbidity from exposure. Only two patients reported the use of a safety belt (4% of series). There were no cases of gunshot wounds in this review, either self-inflicted or hunter-related. The chief reasons reported for these falls were errors in placement that resulted in structural failure of the stand, or errors made while climbing into or out of the stand (50% of falls).

CONCLUSION

Devastating spine and brain injuries continue to occur after falls from tree stands during recreational hunting when safety belts are not used. Our results suggest a continuing need for the education of hunters concerning safe tree stand hunting practices, including proper methods of stand placement, assessment of tree branch strength, avoidance of fatigue and alcohol, anticipation of firearm recoil, and proper methods of stand entrance and exit. Trauma prevention programs directed toward heightened public awareness of these injuries during hunting season are still needed.

Ultrasound in abdominal trauma

This article reviews current issues regarding the Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) examination. Technical performance issues, decision-making and practice algorithms, fluid volume and scoring systems, proficiency and training, and the role of the FAST in pediatric trauma are covered. This article examines the FAST examination from a practical, evidenced-based stand-point.

Establishment of a teaching animal model for sonographic diagnosis of trauma

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound is widely accepted as a valuable diagnostic tool for detecting intra-abdominal and intrathoracic bleeding in trauma patients. Nevertheless, many doctors are reluctant to use it because they do not have sufficient training. This study aimed to define intra-abdominal and intrathoracic fluid volumes that can be detected by sonography and their relation to fluid width in pigs to establish a clinically relevant animal model for teaching and training.

METHODS

Different volumes of normal saline were infused into the abdomen (50-2,000 mL) and chest (25-250 mL) in five anesthetized pigs. The maximum width of fluid as detected by ultrasound was recorded. The right upper quadrant, left upper quadrant, pelvis, and right paracolic section of the abdomen and right pleural cavity were studied. An experienced radiologist performed the studies. The effects on respiratory and cardiovascular functions were evaluated.

RESULTS

The sonographic findings in the pig were similar to those in humans. Up to 50 mL of intra-abdominal fluid and up to 25 mL of intrathoracic fluid could be detected by ultrasound. There was a significant correlation between the volume infused and the fluid width detected. The respiratory and cardiovascular monitoring of the animals showed that the infused intrathoracic volumes mimicked a survivable hemothorax.

CONCLUSION

The pig may serve as an excellent clinically relevant model with which to teach surgeons detection of different volumes of intra-abdominal and intrathoracic fluids. The value of this model as an educational tool has yet to be tested.

Sensitivity in detecting free intraperitoneal fluid with the pelvic views of the FAST exam

The multiple-view focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) exam is an integral tool in the assessment of blunt abdominal trauma. A prospective observational study was performed to compute the average minimum volume of detectable intraperitoneal fluid with the pelvic views of the FAST exam. All adult patients from October 1999 to May 2001, who presented to the ED with blunt abdominal trauma and underwent a clinically indicated diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL), were candidates for admission to the pelvic ultrasound study. In the supine position, patients were administered lavage fluid in 100 cc increments until the examiner detected the fluid on ultrasound. An independent reviewer also examined the hard-copy ultrasound images for fluid detection. Patients were excluded if they had (1) a positive DPL for hemoperitoneum (defined as 10 cc of gross blood or >100,000 red blood cells/mL), (2) a positive initial ultrasound for free fluid, or (3) lacked sufficient hard-copy ultrasound images. The mean minimal volume of fluid needed for pelvic ultrasound detection by the examiner and reviewer was 157 and 129 cc (n = 7), respectively. The median quantity of fluid for ultrasound detection by both the examiner and reviewer was 100 cc. The pelvic views of the FAST exam identified a significantly smaller quantity of intraperitoneal fluid than previous studies of the right upper quadrant single-view exam.

Wireless and satellite transmission of prehospital focused abdominal sonography for trauma

OBJECTIVE

As military operations become smaller and more remote and as humanitarian missions increase, ultrasound technology is emerging as a valuable asset for defining injuries in austere settings. This study evaluated the feasibility of focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST) examinations in a field environment with real-time images sent wireless to an antenna and over satellite.

METHODS

Using a 6-lb SonoSite portable ultrasound device with battery pack, FAST examinations were performed on a healthy volunteer, transferred wireless at distances of 1,000 and 1,500 feet from the receiving antenna using a vest-mounted microwave transmitter, and then redirected over satellite (INMARSAT) to a remote hospital for review by emergency physicians, and a radiologist.

RESULTS

Real-time wireless transmissions at 1,500 feet reliably yielded images without quality or interpretability drop compared with those recorded digitally at the examination site. A 32% reduction in image quality and interpretability was seen with still images and a 42% reduction was noted with cine loops using INMARSAT. The authors did not find the upper distance limit of the wireless transmitter used.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests 1) that remote FAST examinations are plausible for prehospital care and triage using new-generation portable ultrasound units, 2) that line-of-sight transmission of FAST examinations when compared with on-site images results in no degradation in image quality or interpretability at distances used, 3) that ranges greater than 1,500 feet are feasible for interpretable examinations and therefore line-of-site mass casualty or field triage sites, and 4) that real-time INMARSAT transmission of FAST examinations at 64 kbps may serve a limited role for remote clinical interpretation.

Focused assessment with sonography for trauma patients by clinicians: Initial experience and results

OBJECTIVES

To describe the establishment of a service to provide bedside focused assessment sonography in trauma and to evaluate the service to date.

SETTING

Emergency department of an urban trauma centre.

METHODS

A prospective study of trauma patients who received a focused assessment sonography in trauma examination performed by a clinician managing the trauma in the emergency department. Accuracy was determined by comparing the scan interpretation with abdomino-pelvic computerized tomography, laparotomy or postmortem examination.

RESULTS

The study period ran from 1 January 2000 to 11 September 2001 inclusive (20 months). One hundred and forty patients were included, with a final diagnosis established by computerized tomography (n = 124) and/or laparotomy (n = 18). There were 26 true-positives, 101 true-negatives, two false-positives and 11 false-negatives. Ten of the false-negative studies were performed by clinicians who had not reached accreditation. The sensitivity of focused assessment sonography in trauma was 70%, specificity 98% and diagnostic accuracy 91%.

CONCLUSIONS

We have described the implementation of a clinician-based focused assessment sonography in trauma service within the emergency department with the support of radiology/ultrasound and trauma service. Processes for credentialling, quality assurance and training need to be in place. Significant issues exist with the length of time it takes clinicians to reach accreditation, in order that a critical mass of clinicians exists to provide a consistent service. The credentialling process should mandate a minimum number of supervised examinations.

The Role of Positive Examinations in Training for the Focused Assessment Sonogram in Trauma (FAST) Examination

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the inclusion of known positive patients to the practical portion of a Focused Assessment Sonogram in Trauma (FAST) training course improves overall training and increases FAST accuracy. This is a prospective double-blind design. Original course participants (PRE) underwent a 2-hour didactic session and practicum with ten normal volunteers. Modified course participants (POST) additionally imaged five peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients to simulate positive examinations. The practitioners (six PRE and five POST) were compared as to their ability to detect and quantify intraperitoneal fluid (0–2000 cc) in nine PD patients during a double-blind prospective examination. Test results were reported as positive or negative. Positive results were further quantified by volume. Each practitioner performed ten examinations. Data for inexperienced clinicians are presented. Sensitivity for detecting ≤750 cm3 was 45 per cent PRE and 87 per cent POST ( P = 0.02). Accuracy in quantifying volume within 250 cm3 was 38 per cent PRE and 44 per cent POST (not significant). FAST accuracy for inexperienced sonographers—particularly in diagnosing smaller volumes—can be improved significantly by including positive studies in training. Exposure to positive FAST examinations during training improves the learning curve. With the growing dependency on FAST to accurately triage blunt abdominal trauma safe and effective FAST training should consist of didactic education and a practical portion that includes positive studies. When screened properly PD patients can be used effectively to demonstrate positive FAST studies.

Current use and perceived utility of ultrasound for evaluation of pediatric compared with adult trauma patients

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the current use and perceived utility of ultrasound in the assessment of pediatric compared with adult trauma patients.

METHODS

A questionnaire was developed and mailed to 72 pediatric emergency physicians, 120 general emergency physicians, and 117 trauma attendings at 240 institutions.

RESULTS

Of 309 surveys, 234 (75%) were completed. Ultrasound was available to 169 of 234 (72%) of the physicians, and 122 of 169 (72%) were performing the Focused Assessment by Sonography for Trauma examination to evaluate trauma patients. Seventy-three percent (110/150) of general emergency and trauma surgeons reported that ultrasound was available equally with or more readily than computed tomography (CT) scan. Only 26% (5/19) of pediatric emergency attendings considered ultrasound equally available with CT scan, and none considered it more readily available than CT scan. Ninety-two percent (137/149) of general emergency and trauma attendings responding to the question about utility considered ultrasound somewhat useful to extremely useful for assessing adult trauma patients, and 77% considered it useful for pediatric patients. Only 57% (12/21) of pediatric emergency attendings responding to the same question perceived ultrasound as useful for pediatric trauma evaluations.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that ultrasound for the assessment of trauma patients is widely used by general emergency physicians and trauma surgeons, whereas pediatric emergency physicians report less use and perceived utility.

Senior Surgical Residents Can Accurately Interpret Trauma Radiographs

Surgical residents routinely interpret radiographic studies during the evaluation of trauma patients, which directs further evaluation and invasive procedures. Official interpretations—“post-reading”—of radiographs by radiologists may be delayed by hours or even days. Trauma surgeons frequently act on their impressions before “official” readings are available. It has been demonstrated that surgical residents can accurately perform and interpret trauma ultrasound examinations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of senior surgery residents to interpret basic trauma radiographs. Interpretations of trauma radiographs (cervical spine, chest, pelvis, and CT of the brain) were recorded prospectively by the senior surgery resident present during trauma evaluations. These interpretations were compared with the findings of the radiologist as obtained from the official radiology report. Differing results were divided into clinically significant and clinically nonsignificant findings using defined criteria. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were determined. Interpretations of trauma radiographs by senior residents achieved an accuracy of 100 per cent for cervical spine radiographs, 95.9 per cent for chest radiographs, 98.0 per cent for pelvis radiographs, and 97.9 per cent for CT of the head. In aggregate senior residents interpreted trauma radiographs with 97.9 per cent accuracy. Differences that were considered clinically significant according to preset criteria occurred in 2.1 per cent of observations. We conclude that senior general surgical residents can accurately interpret trauma radiology, including CT of the brain. These results suggest that institutional policies for post-reading of trauma radiology should be reassessed.

Prospective evaluation of handheld ultrasound in the diagnosis of blunt abdominal trauma

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the Sonosite 180 handheld ultrasound in the diagnosis of haemoperitoneum in blunt abdominal trauma.

METHODS

Trauma ultrasound using the Focused Assessment with Sonar for Trauma (FAST) technique was performed using the Sonosite 180 handheld ultrasound during the primary survey of adult patients triaged to the resuscitation room with multiple trauma or suspected abdominal injury. The ultrasound findings were compared against the investigation of choice of the attending surgeon/accident & emergency physician--CT, DPL, laparotomy or clinical observation.

RESULTS

50 patients who had sustained blunt abdominal trauma were evaluated using FAST. Satisfactory images were obtained in 96%. There were 5 true positive scans confirmed by CT, DPL or laparotomy. There were no false negative or false investigations. The sensitivity and specificity of handheld FAST was 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

Handheld ultrasound using the Sonosite 180 system can be successfully used by appropriately trained doctors as the primary investigation in the acute evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma.

Complementary roles of diagnostic peritoneal lavage and computed tomography in the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma

OBJECTIVE

To assess in randomized prospective format sensitivity, laparotomy rate, and cost-effectiveness of using diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) in a complementary role with computed tomography (CT) in the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma.

METHODS

Blunt trauma patients greater than 18 years of age were eligible for entry in the study. The study period was from February 1999 to July 2000 at an urban Level I trauma center. All patients were hemodynamically stable upon study entry and had abdominal tenderness with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores > 13 or GCS < 14. Patients were randomized to a DPL arm (DPL-CT) versus a CT arm. If randomized to the CT arm, patients underwent abdominal/pelvis CT. If CT was positive for solid organ injury, patients were observed. If free fluid was identified on CT without solid organ injury, patients were explored. If randomized to DPL-CT, patients underwent closed infraumbilical DPL, except pelvic fractures that were done with the open supraumbilical technique. If the DPL result was > 20,000 RBCs/mm3, patients underwent abdominal/pelvis CT. If the CT following DPL was consistent with solid organ injury, patients were observed. If the CT following DPL identified free fluid without solid organ injury and DPL was > 100,000 RBCs/mm3, patients were explored.

RESULTS

Two hundred fifty-two patients were entered; 127 patients were randomized to DPL-CT and 125 to CT. Of the 125 patients randomized to CT, 102 (82%) CT scans were negative, 19 (15%) were positive for solid organ injury, and 3 (2%) had free fluid. Three (2%) of the initial negative CT scan patients underwent delayed laparotomy for missed injuries. Of the 127 patients randomized to DPL-CT, 26 (20%) required CT scan, of which 13 (10%) were positive for solid organ injury and 13 (10%) for free fluid. Positive DPL results that were indications for CT ranged from 21,000 to 1 million RBCs/mm3. Eight of the 13 DPL-CT patients with free fluid on CT had DPL results less than 100,000 RBCs/mm3 and did not require laparotomy. There were no known missed injuries in the DPL-CT arm. Seven (6%) laparotomies were performed in the DPL-CT arm and 10 (8%) in the CT arm. The average cost to the patient for abdominal evaluation in the CT arm was 1611 dollars and 650 dollars in the DPL-CT arm.

CONCLUSION

Screening DPL with complementary CT has a low nontherapeutic laparotomy rate and is a sensitive and cost-effective method for the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma.

Does the presence of ultrasound really affect computed tomographic scan use? A prospective randomized trial of ultrasound in trauma

OBJECTIVE

There is a paucity of evidence demonstrating that emergency department (ED) ultrasound changes clinical practice in trauma patients. We hypothesized that the presence of ultrasound would affect clinical decision making as evidenced through abdominal computed tomographic (CT) scan use in blunt multiple trauma patients.

METHODS

This study used a prospective randomized format in an urban county ED with Level II trauma center status (ED census, 72,000 patients per year). Participants were patients with multiple blunt injuries meeting trauma center triage criteria. Patients were randomized to receive either abdominal ultrasound or no ultrasound (control) during initial ED resuscitation. The primary outcome variable was use of abdominal CT scan in patients with and without ultrasound.

RESULTS

Two hundred eight patients were enrolled. The mean age was 40 +/- 18 years, and 62% were men. Mechanism of injury was motor vehicle crash, 56%; automobile versus pedestrian, 18%; motorcycle crash, 16%; falls, 10%; and other, 10%. One hundred four ultrasound and 104 control patients were analyzed. There were no apparent differences between ultrasound and control groups in demographics, injury type, or Injury Severity Score. Fifty-four of 104 (52%) of the control group received abdominal CT scans versus 37 of 104 (36%) abdominal CT scans for the ultrasound group; mean difference in proportions was 15.9 (p < 0.01; 95% confidence interval, 2.6-29.1).

CONCLUSION

In this trial, the routine use of abdominal ultrasound in the evaluation of patients with multiple blunt injuries resulted in significantly fewer abdominal CT scans being obtained. A larger trial is needed to more clearly define the clinical and financial impact of ultrasound in the management of blunt abdominal trauma.

Accuracy of emergency department bedside ultrasonography

OBJECTIVES

To determine which focused ultrasound examinations can be interpreted accurately by emergency physicians who have limited training and experience. To determine whether image quality and/or the operator's level of confidence in the findings correlates with accurate scan interpretation.

METHODS

A prospective sample of consenting adult emergency department patients with the conditions was selected for study. Scans were performed by emergency physicians who had attended a 3-day focused ultrasound examinations instruction course. All scans were videotaped and subsequently reviewed by a radiologist. Accuracy was determined by comparing the emergency physicians scan interpretation with preselected gold standards. Chi-squared tests were employed to determine if the individual performing the scan, the type of scan, patient's body habitus, image quality and/or operator confidence were reliable predictors of accuracy.

RESULTS

Between September 1997 and January 1999, 221 scans were studied. Accuracy varied widely depending on the type of scan performed: aortic scans were 100% accurate whereas renal scans had 68% accuracy. On bivariate analyses, there was little variation in the various operators' levels of proficiency and accuracy of interpretation was not associated with patient body habitus, image quality or operator confidence.

CONCLUSIONS

Neophytes can accurately perform and interpret aortic scans; additional training and/or experience appear to be necessary to achieve proficiency in conducting most of the other scans studied. Inexperienced operators are unable to discern whether their scan interpretations will prove accurate.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of emergency ultrasonography for blunt abdominal trauma

BACKGROUND

How precise and reliable is ultrasonography as a primary tool for injury assessment in blunt abdominal trauma?

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted of prospective clinical trials of ultrasonography for blunt abdominal trauma. Publications were retrieved by structured searching among databases, review articles and major text books. Authors and experts in the field were contacted for original and unpublished data. For statistical analysis, summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROCs) were computed using weighted and robust regression models, with Q* denoting the shoulder of the curve. Post-test probabilities were calculated as a function of pooled likelihood ratios (LRs).

RESULTS

Thirty of 123 trials enrolling 9047 patients were eligible for final analysis. With respect to targeting organ lesions, ultrasonography showed a summary Q* value of 0.91 (inverse variance weights, 95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 0.76-1.07); negative predictive values ranged from 0.72 to 0.99. A similar SROC slope was calculated for screening for free fluid (Q* = 0.89 (95 per cent c.i. 0.73-1.05)). Ultrasonography detects the presence of organ lesions, but fails to exclude abdominal injuries (random effects negative LR 0.23 (95 per cent c.i. 0.18-0.28)). Given a pretest probability of 50 per cent for blunt abdominal injury, a post-test probability of nearly 25 per cent remains in the case of a negative sonogram.

CONCLUSION

Despite its high specificity, ultrasonography has an unexpectedly low sensitivity for the detection of both free fluid and organ lesions. In clinically suspected abdominal trauma, another assessment (e.g. helical computed tomography) must be performed regardless of the initial ultrasonographic findings.

Discriminatory power of 3.5 MHz convex and 7.5 MHz linear ultrasound probes for the imaging of traumatic splenic lesions: a feasibility study

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound is a powerful tool for recognition of free fluid after blunt abdominal trauma, whereas its role for detection of organ lesions remains to be defined. The objective of this study was to determine the diagnostic value of different ultrasound transducers for the precise detection of visceral damage rather than its surrogates in case of splenic injury.

METHODS

After a standardized focused abdominal sonogram for trauma protocol to screen for hemoperitoneum, 37 slim, hemodynamically stable subjects with suspected torso trauma were investigated for the extent of parenchymal lesions of the spleen using a 3.5 MHz curved array and a 7.5 MHz linear device. Helical computed tomographic scanning was carried out as the reference standard in all cases.

RESULTS

Twenty patients presented splenic damage. The 7.5 MHz transducer showed higher accuracy than the lower frequency probe for the detection of tissue irregularities (difference in proportions, 16.2%; 95% confidence interval, -1.9%-33.5%). A similar trend was observed for 13 lacerations subsequently progressing to two-timed splenic rupture that required surgery (absolute risk reduction, 8.1%; 95% confidence interval, -7.6%-23.9%). With an observed prevalence of 54% for the presence of splenic injury, organ lacerations could be excluded more confidently using the linear probe (posttest probability, 16% vs. 36%).

CONCLUSION

In slim patients, higher frequency linear ultrasound probes can provide therapy-relevant information on the integrity of splenic parenchyma after blunt abdominal trauma.

Fast education: a comparison of teaching models for trauma sonography

This study's objective was to evaluate the peritoneal dialysis and mannequin simulator models for the hands-on portion of a 4-h focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST) course. After an introductory lecture about trauma sonography and practice on normal models, trainees were assigned randomly to two groups. They practiced FAST on one of the two simulator models. After the didactic and hands-on portions of the seminar, FAST interpretation testing revealed mean scores of 82% and 78% for the peritoneal dialysis and mannequin simulator groups, respectively (p = 0.95). Post-course surveys demonstrated mean satisfaction scores for peritoneal dialysis and mannequin simulator models of 3.85 and 3.25, respectively, on a 4-point Likert scale (p = 0.317). A FAST educational seminar, which provides both didactic and hands-on instruction, can be completed in 4 h; the hands-on instruction phase can incorporate both normal models and abnormal simulation models, such as the peritoneal dialysis model and the multimedia mannequin simulator.

Defining the Learning Curve for the Focused Abdominal Sonogram for Trauma (FAST) Examination: Implications for Credentialing

Focused Abdominal Sonogram for Trauma (FAST) examination is being used increasingly for the torso evaluation of injured patients. In a controlled setting using peritoneal dialysis patients as models for injured patients with free fluid we hypothesized that more experienced providers would perform FAST with greater accuracy. Twelve fellow or attending level trauma surgeons, two radiologists, and one ultrasound technician were studied for their ability to detect intraperitoneal fluid (0–1600 cm3) in nine peritoneal dialysis patients with two different volumes of dialysate/patient. FAST experience with injured patients was defined as minimal (<30 patients examinations), moderate (30–100), or extensive (>100). All surgeons had participated in a didactic/practical course before the study. Test results were reported as “+” or “-” by the participant; “+” results were further quantified by volume. The sensitivity of those in the minimal-, moderate-, and extensive-experience to detect <1 L was 45, 87, and 100 per cent, respectively; the accuracy in detecting dialysate volume within 250 cm3 was 38, 63, and 90 per cent, respectively. In this controlled setting the accuracy of FAST particularly in diagnosing smaller volumes, as well as the ability to quantify volume, improves with experience. The learning curve for FAST starts to flatten out at 30 to 100 examinations. Training and credentialing policies should consider these findings to optimize patient care.

Diagnostic performance of trauma US in identifying abdominal or pelvic free fluid and serious abdominal or pelvic injury

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

This study assessed the ability of a six-point trauma ultrasound (US) evaluation (a) to identify the presence of free fluid in the abdomen or pelvis, with computed tomography (CT) and laparotomy used as diagnostic standards and (b) to predict the presence of abdominal or pelvic injury, particularly injury requiring surgical intervention.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Of 156 patients who underwent US evaluation for free fluid after sustaining blunt and penetrating trauma, 147 were entered into the prospective study and underwent follow-up CT and/or laparotomy (n = 79), in-hospital observation, or outpatient examination.

RESULTS

The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy of US for identifying abdominal or pelvic free fluid were 69%, 100%, 100%, 95%, and 95%, respectively. The corresponding values for predicting abdominal and pelvic injury on the basis of free fluid status alone were 57%, 99%, 80%, 96%, and 95%, respectively. Performing repeated US examinations in patients with deteriorating clinical status decreased the false-negative rate by 50%, increasing the sensitivity for free fluid detection to 85% and the negative predictive value to 97%. Similarly, the sensitivity and negative predictive value for detection of injury increased to 71% and 97%, respectively. A learning curve was also observed, with 67% of the false-negative findings occurring in the first 3 months of the 19-month study.

CONCLUSION

A six-point trauma US evaluation can reliably identify abdominal and pelvic free fluid, which can be a reliable indicator of abdominal or pelvic injury. Scanning conditions must be optimized, and the approach to clinical management must be cautious.

Feasibility and profitability of a radiology department providing trauma US as part of a trauma alert team

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and profitability of a radiology department providing a six-point trauma ultrasound (US) examination for abdominal or pelvic free fluid as part of a trauma alert team.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 191 trauma alerts, which generated 156 US examinations. A radiologist and a departmental technologist carried beepers and responded to level I and II traumas. A departmental secretary or technologist recorded when the responding technologist exited and re-entered the department and if US was performed. If performed, the US examination evaluated the four abdominal and pelvic quadrants and the suprapubic and subxiphoid regions. For 64 patients, the responding technologist recorded the times of the trauma alert, emergency room arrival, US start and finish, and return to the radiology department.

RESULTS

Median response, wait, scan duration, and return times were 2, 8, 5, and 7 minutes, respectively. Median costs for the technician, physician, archiving, transcription, and equipment were $8.17, $30.85, $0.97, $4.80, and $41.22, respectively. Reimbursement per examination averaged $110.60. Sensitivity analyses that varied the time spent (median vs mean), US non-use rate (10%-18%), and years of depreciation (5-7 years) yielded net results ranging from a $36.60 profit to a $6.12 loss per examination.

CONCLUSION

A radiology department can profitably respond to trauma alerts and provide a six-point trauma US examination for free fluid.

Utilization of FAST (Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma) in 1999: Results of a Survey of North American Trauma Centers

Although much has been written about FAST (Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma) in the last decade little is known about its present clinical utilization. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and characterize the contemporary utilization of FAST at trauma centers in the United States and Canada. In 1999 trauma directors or their delegates at Level I regional trauma centers in the United States and Canada were surveyed either by fax or phone regarding the present utilization and the future of FAST at their center. The overall survey response rate was 91 per cent with 96 of 105 centers completing the survey. Of the 96 centers surveyed 78 were in the United States and 18 were in Canada. Of the 78 U.S. centers surveyed 62 (79%) routinely use FAST, and it is done by surgeons in 39 per cent, surgeons and emergency departments in 21 per cent, emergency departments in 5 per cent, and radiologists in 35 per cent. Most centers (79%) thought that it sped up their workups, and 89 per cent said it was an advance in patient care. FAST is used in penetrating injury at 58 per cent of centers, and some centers use FAST to assess organ injury. The utilization of diagnostic peritoneal lavage and CT has markedly decreased at many centers. Almost all respondents thought that FAST should be a component of surgery resident training. The utilization of FAST is significantly less in Canada than in the United States ( P < 0.05). Our conclusions are the following. FAST has become routinely used at the majority of the U.S. centers surveyed. FAST is performed by clinicians at 65 per cent of the trauma centers surveyed. The utilization of CT and diagnostic peritoneal lavage has changed. Many centers have broadened the scope of FAST to include the assessment of organ, pediatric, and penetrating injury.

Imaging in abdominal trauma

Prompt recognition and timely intervention both play a crucial role in managing patients with blunt abdominal trauma. In most cases of multiply injured patients, where physical examination is indeterminate, a rapid and accurate screening method is a valuable adjunct for care-providers. Through the years, different imaging techniques have been utilized for this purpose; among them are diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL), ultrasonography (US) and computed tomography (CT). Proponents of each modality have their own beneficial reasons for adopting that particular method of imaging. Needless to say, despite the high sensitivity and specificity values cited for each, all the methods have their own limitations. After having reviewed the advantages and disadvantages of these three modalities, this article suggests that there is not one single modality that is considered the best. Rather, all three can be complementary and the use of each can be appropriate for a particular subset of patients, given a particular clinical situation, and taking into account the resources available.

Focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST) in children with blunt abdominal trauma

BACKGROUND

Focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST) has been well reported in adults, but its applicability in children is less well established. We decided to test the hypothesis that FAST and computed tomography (CT) are equivalent imaging studies in the setting of pediatric blunt abdominal trauma.

METHODS

One hundred seven hemodynamically stable children undergoing CT for blunt abdominal trauma were prospectively investigated using FAST. The ability of FAST to predict injury by detecting free intraperitoneal fluid was compared with CT as the imaging standard.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients had CT documented injuries. There were no late injuries missed by CT. FAST detected free fluid in 12 patients. Ten patients had solid organ injury but no free fluid and, thus, were not detected by FAST. The sensitivity of FAST relative to CT was only 0.55 and the negative predictive value was only 0.50.

CONCLUSION

FAST has insufficient sensitivity and negative predictive value to be used as a screening imaging test in hemodynamically stable children with blunt abdominal trauma.

Institutional and individual learning curves for focused abdominal ultrasound for trauma: cumulative sum analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate both institutional and individual learning curves with focused abdominal ultrasound for trauma (FAST) by analyzing the incidence of diagnostic inaccuracies as a function of examiner experience for a group of trauma surgeons performing the study in the setting of an urban level I trauma center.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Trauma surgeons are routinely using FAST to evaluate patients with blunt trauma for hemoperitoneum. The volume of experience required for practicing trauma surgeons to be able to perform this examination with a reproducible level of accuracy has not been fully defined.

METHODS

The authors reviewed prospectively gathered data for all patients undergoing FAST for blunt trauma during a 30-month period. All FAST interpretations were validated by at least one of four methods: computed tomography, diagnostic peritoneal lavage, celiotomy, or serial clinical evaluations. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was used to describe the learning curves for each individual surgeon at target accuracy rates of 85%, 90%, and 95% and for the institution as a whole at target examination accuracy rates of 85%, 90%, 95%, and 98%.

RESULTS

Five trauma surgeons performed 546 FAST examinations during the study period. CUSUM analysis of the aggregate experience revealed that the examiners as a group exceeded 90% accuracy at the outset of clinical examination. The level of accuracy did not improve with either increased frequency of performance or total examination experience. The accuracy rates observed for each trauma surgeon ranged from 87% to 98%. The surgeon with the highest accuracy rate performed the fewest examinations. No practitioner demonstrated improved accuracy with increased experience.

CONCLUSIONS

Trauma surgeons who are newly trained in the use of FAST can achieve an overall accuracy rate of at least 90% from the outset of clinical experience with this modality. Interexaminer variations in accuracy rates, which are observed above this level of performance, are probably related more to issues surrounding patient selection and inherent limitations of the examination in certain populations than to practitioner errors in the performance or interpretation of the study.

ED evaluation of the pediatric trauma patient by ultrasonography

The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of ultrasound examination of pediatric trauma patients by emergency physicians. Pediatric (age less than 18 years) trauma patients presenting to the emergency department of a level I trauma center were prospectively examined with bedside ultrasound during the secondary survey of their trauma resuscitation. Examinations were performed by emergency medicine residents and attending physicians who had completed an 8-hour course on trauma ultrasonography. Trauma physicians providing care to the patient were blinded to the results of the examination. In 47 children (median age 9 years) computed tomography of the abdomen/pelvis or laparotomy were also performed and served as gold standards to verify the presence or absence of free fluid in the abdomen. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the ultrasound examination for the detection of free fluid in the abdominal cavity was 75% (95% confidence interval [CI] 36% to 95%), 97% (95% CI 81% to 100%), and 92% (95% Cl 77% to 98%). Positive and negative predictive values were 90% (95% CI 46% to 100%) and 92% (95% CI 74% to 99%), respectively. Ultrasound examinations took an average of 7 minutes and 36 seconds, although this did not take into consideration delays created by interruptions for other diagnostic tests or procedures. An emergency physician and radiologist agreed on blinded interpretations of 83% of the examinations (kappa = 0.56). Bedside ultrasonography is a reliable and rapid method for screening traumatized children for the presence or absence of free fluid in the peritoneum even in the hands of novice sonographers.

Physician training requirements in sonography: how many cases are needed for competence?

OBJECTIVE

Physician competence in the performance of sonographic studies was assessed after their involvement in predetermined increments of cases to determine whether the case volumes currently required by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and the American College of Radiology for training in sonography can be lowered substantially.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sonographic competence tests were administered to 10 first-year diagnostic radiology residents after their involvement in increments of 50 cases, up to a total of 200 cases (four competency tests). Each competency test consisted of the resident's independently scanning and interpreting 10 clinically mandated studies that were scored in comparison with the examination performed by the sonographer and interpreted by an attending radiologist. Trainee studies were graded on the percentage of anatomic landmarks depicted, the number of reporting errors, the number of clinically significant reporting errors, and the percentage of cases receiving a passing score.

RESULTS

Although resident performance improved progressively with increasing experience for all parameters assessed, performance of the group was poor even after their involvement in 200 cases. At this testing level, the mean percentage of anatomic landmarks depicted successfully was 56.5%; the mean total reporting errors per case was 1.2; the mean clinically significant errors per case was 0.5; and the mean percentage of cases receiving a passing score was 16%. Impressive performance differences were observed among residents for all parameters assessed, and these differences were not explained by the number of months of radiology training the resident had taken before the sonography rotation.

CONCLUSION

Involvement in 200 or fewer cases during the training period is not sufficient for physicians to develop an acceptable level of competence in sonography.

Training residents using simulation technology: experience with ultrasound for trauma

BACKGROUND

The need for surgeons to become proficient in performing and interpreting ultrasound examinations has been well recognized in recent years, but providing standardized training remains a significant challenge. The UltraSim (MedSim, Ft. Lauderdale, Fla) ultrasound simulator is a modified ultrasound machine that stores patient data in three-dimensional images. By scanning on the UltraSim mannequin, the student can reconstruct these images in real-time, eliminating the need for finding normal and abnormal models, while providing an objective method of both teaching and testing. The objective of this study was to compare the posttest results between residents trained on a real-time ultrasound simulator versus those trained in a traditional hands-on patient format. We hypothesized that both methods of teaching would yield similar results as judged by performance on the interpretive portion of a standardized posttest. It is designed as a prospective, cohort study from two university trauma centers involving residents at the beginning of their first or second postgraduate year of training. The main outcome measure was performance on a standardized posttest, which included interpretation of ultrasound cases recorded on videotape.

METHODS

Students first took a written pretest to evaluate their baseline knowledge of ultrasound physics as well as their ability to interpret basic ultrasound images. The didactic portion of the course used the same teaching materials for all residents and included lectures on ultrasound physics, ultrasound use in trauma/critical care, and a series of instructional videos. This didactic session was followed by 1 hour for each student of hands-on training on medical models/medical patients (group I) or by training on the ultrasound simulator (group II). The pretest was repeated at the completion of the course (posttest). Data were stratified by postgraduate year, i.e., PG1 or PG2.

RESULTS

A total of 74 residents were trained and tested in this study (PG1 = 48, PG2 = 26). All residents showed significant improvement in their pretest and posttest scores (p = 0.00) in both their knowledge of ultrasound physics and in their interpretation of ultrasound images. Importantly, we could not demonstrate any significant difference between groups trained on models/patients (group I) versus those trained on the simulator (group II) when comparing their posttest interpretation of ultrasound images presented on videotapes (PG1, group I mean score 6.9 +/- 1.4 vs. PG1, group II mean score 6.5 +/- 1.6, p = 0.32; PG2, group I mean score 7.7 +/- 1.4 vs. PG2, group II mean score 7.9 +/- 1.2, p = 0.70).

CONCLUSION

The use of a simulator is a convenient and objective method of introducing ultrasound to surgery residents and compares favorably with the experience gained with traditional hands-on patient models.

Diagnostic evaluation of patients with blunt abdominal trauma: a decision analysis

OBJECTIVES

Using decision analysis, to compare the expected utility (EU) of diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL), computed tomography (CT), and ultrasonography (US) to determine the optimal modality for the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) in hemodynamically stable adults.

METHODS

Data points for the decision analysis were obtained from three sources: 1) prevalence of BAT and the sensitivity and specificity of each diagnostic modality were determined through a criteria-based review of the literature; 2) rate of BAT necessitating immediate intervention, perioperative complication rate, and operative mortality rate were calculated using data from the authors' institution's trauma registry; and 3) outcome utilities were determined by telephone survey of adults in a random sample of households in the region. The decision tree was constructed and evaluated in standard fashion. For each diagnostic modality, the authors calculated the EU using the minimum, mean, and maximum sensitivity and specificity across a range of prevalence. Mean outcome utilities were used for each branch of the tree when calculating the EU.

RESULTS

The EU of CT was consistently lower than the EUs of DPL and US at all levels of prevalence. However, the rank order of the EUs of US and DPL varied with the prevalence of BAT. When the prevalence was <30%, the EU of US was higher than that for DPL. When the prevalence was 30-40%, the EUs were similar. When the prevalence was >40%, the EU of US was less than that of DPL.

CONCLUSIONS

Among institutions operating under constraints similar to those used in this model, the optimal diagnostic modality for the evaluation of BAT can be determined based on the sensitivity and specificity of the modality at their institution and the prevalence of BAT in their patient population.

The focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST) examination: considerations and recommendations for training physicians in the use of a new clinical tool

Focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST) is being used by growing numbers of emergency physicians and surgeons because it has proven to be an accurate, rapid, and repeatable bedside test for evaluating abdominal trauma victims. Controversy exists about the optimal means of FAST education and the number of examinations necessary to demonstrate competency. Most FAST educators agree that FAST education should consist of three phases: didactic, practical, and experiential. This article summarizes options and preliminary recommendations suitable for developing a FAST curriculum.

Sonographic assessment of traumatic injury. Future developments

In all its forms and applications, sonography plays a significant role in the management of injured patients, from the emergency department to beyond hospital discharge. The use of new and existing sonographic technology will increase because sonographic imaging and measurements are generally less invasive; are inexpensive; use no ionizing radiation; and are portable, repeatable, and, in many instances, as accurate as the so-called "contemporary gold standards." The training and credentialing of physicians in sonography is in evolution and will be an increasingly important issue with more widespread use and broader applications. The future of sonography in trauma care in the next millennium is bright, and surgeons and surgical residents are encouraged to gain proficiency and learn about this new surgical frontier as it evolves.

Prospective evidence of the superiority of a sonography-based algorithm in the assessment of blunt abdominal injury

BACKGROUND

Although the routine use of FAST (focused assessment with sonography for trauma) in the evaluation of trauma victims is increasing, to our knowledge, a prospective comparison of contemporary adult trauma victims managed with and without FAST has not been reported in North America.

METHODS

Adult victims of blunt trauma for whom there was a suspicion of abdominal injury were managed with one of two diagnostic algorithms, FAST or no-FAST. The two algorithms were compared for diagnostic accuracy, cost, time, and delayed diagnoses.

RESULTS

Among 706 patients (mean Injury Severity Score, 23), 460 were managed with FAST and 246 with no-FAST. The two groups were similar with respect to age, Injury Severity Score, prehospital time, and mortality (p = not significant). There were 3 of 460 (0.7%) delayed diagnoses in the FAST group and 4 of 246 (1.6%) in the no-FAST group (p = not significant). The diagnostic accuracy for the FAST and no-FAST algorithms was 99% and 98%, respectfully. The FAST and no-FAST algorithms led to similar rates of laparotomy, 13% and 14%, respectfully, but nonoperative management was more common in the no-FAST group (p < 0.01). The mean diagnostic cost for the FAST algorithm was $156, compared with $540 with the no-FAST algorithm (p < 0.0001) and the mean time required for diagnostic work-up was 53 minutes with the FAST algorithm, compared with 151 minutes with the no-FAST algorithm (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

This study has provided prospective evidence that a FAST-based algorithm for blunt abdominal injury was more rapid, less expensive, and as accurate as an algorithm that used computed tomography or diagnostic peritoneal lavage only. Trauma centers are encouraged to incorporate a FAST-based algorithm into their initial management of blunt trauma victims.

Competency-Based Instruction to Improve the Surgical Resident Technique and Accuracy of the Trauma Ultrasound

In a surgical trauma center, programs and workshops have improved the performance on focused abdominal sonogram for trauma (FAST). The purpose of this single-blind study was to prove that a cadaver laboratory competency-based instruction program may be an effective method of FAST training to acquire the skills that would be applied in the trauma room. The study was divided in two parts, laboratory and clinical. Nine surgical residents were divided into two groups: Group I performed the test only once, and Group II performed the training twice. A third “group” was the senior ultrasound technician, whose readings served as our “gold standard” with which to compare the resident readings (Group HI). Using cadavers, a 2-cm catheter was introduced into the peritoneal cavity. Sequential aliquots of normal saline were introduced into the abdominal cavity at 0–, 200–, 400–, 600–, and 1000-cc increments in each group tested. The residents were asked to describe their examinations for the presence or absence of fluid in the abdomen. The ultrasound examination was then performed with the cadaver in three different positions to study if there was any difference of fluid detection in varied positions. True positive, true negative, and accuracy were then calculated comparing the three different groups of test sonographers. In the second part of the study, the same residents were then followed in the trauma room, where they performed the FAST in the absence of the ultrasound technician during emergencies. As in the laboratory, the accuracy of their reading compared with that of the ultrasound technician was also evaluated. From 400 cc and upward, Group II began having an overall significantly superior accuracy than the first group and the technician in most quadrants examined. The trend was apparent for more accurate results in all quadrants and positions by all groups as the fluid was increased. Overall, group II was most superior in detection of intra-abdominal fluid in the cadaver. In the clinical scenario, the residents as a whole had similar accuracy (92% vs 96%) in reading FAST as the ultrasound technician. Our results suggest that surgical residents have the ability to detect fluid in the abdomen, there exists a fast learning curve, and the minimum detection level of fluid was between 200 and 400 cc in the peritoneal cavity in the laboratory. Surgical residents were able to detect intra-abdominal fluid in the trauma situation, as shown by the 92 per cent accuracy of the FAST in the emergency situation. We conclude that a cadaver laboratory training program is an important adjunct to improve the skills of the resident in performing and reading FAST.

Is the 'tunnel of death' a suitable modality for investigating the severely traumatized child?

BACKGROUND

The child who has suffered severe physical trauma and is physiologically unstable can often present a diagnostic dilemma to the clinician in the emergency room.

METHODS

In an attempt to clarify the situation there is often a decision made to perform computed tomographic scanning in such children.

RESULTS

This is an extremely dangerous investigation in this situation given that the child has to have a GA as well as being unstable from the injuries.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound is easier, less expensive, can be performed in the emergency room and can be performed by relatively inexperienced operators with good diagnostic accuracy.