An anatomic study of the internal mammary veins: clinical implications for free-tissue-transfer breast reconstruction

Choice of flaps for breast reconstruction

The optimal method for breast reconstruction should be safe, reliable, and accessible for every patient, and it should display little or no donor-site morbidity. After comparing mammary implants it has been found that autogenous breast reconstruction can create a ptotic, soft, symmetrical breast mound. The transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap (TRAM) remains the most popular method for autogenous reconstruction. Modern trends in breast reconstruction using the TRAM flap have promoted adequate blood supply to the flap while minimizing donor-site defects in the anterior abdominal wall. The pedicled TRAM flap remains one of the most frequently used flaps, but the indirect blood supply in this flap has required many modifications and refinements. Such modifications have included the bipedicled TRAM flap, the free TRAM flap, and the supercharged TRAM flap. To avoid donor-site morbidities, the muscle-sparing free TRAM, deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP), and superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap were introduced. The DIEP perforator flap requires meticulous technique but offers proven reliability and a low rate of complications. As surgeons become more comfortable with harvesting DIEP flaps, the frequency of usage seems likely to increase. The latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap, gluteus maximus musculocutaneous flap, and others may be selected when these modifications of free TRAM flap are unavailable or unusable.

Internal mammary artery and vein: Recipient vessels for free tissue transfer to the head and neck in the vessel-depleted neck

BACKGROUND

Microvascular free tissue transfer is a standard reconstructive option for postablative defects of the head and neck. However, the success of this surgery requires suitable recipient vessels in the cervical region. This form of reconstruction can be particularly challenging in the vessel-depleted neck. While the internal mammary artery and vein (IMA/V) have been used extensively in breast reconstruction, there are few reports describing their use in head and neck reconstruction. We report the first case series of the use of the internal mammary vessels for head and neck microvascular reconstruction.

METHODS

We reviewed 5 cases of free tissue transfers to the head and neck in which extensive prior treatment precluded the use of more traditional recipient vessels in the neck or upper chest.

RESULTS

A variety of free flaps were transferred for different reconstructive problems which included: chin/lower lip (n = 2), closure of widely patent tracheoesophageal puncture sites (n = 2), and pharyngoesophageal reconstruction following staged repair of a severe stenosis (n = 1). The radial forearm free flap was transferred in 4 patients and the rectus abdominus free flap in 1 patient. The IMA/V on the right side was prepared in all cases. All free flaps were successfully revascularized without the need for vein grafts and without the need for any microvascular revision procedures.

CONCLUSION

The internal mammary artery and vein provide reliable, easily accessible recipient vessels for microvascular reconstruction in the vessel-depleted neck. The selection of free flap donor sites with long donor vessels facilitates the microvascular repair.

The Internal Mammary Artery and Vein as Recipient Vessels for Microvascular Breast Reconstruction:

Clinical applications for the internal mammary artery include use as an arterial conduit for coronary revascularization and as a recipient artery for microvascular reconstruction of the breast. This study was completed in an attempt to resolve the controversy over which indication should have priority. Five hundred twenty women with breast cancer who underwent breast reconstruction were reviewed. Of these, 240 were 50 years of age or more and were evaluated for cardiac disease. Three components were studied that included analysis of factors related to cardiac function (prior cardiac surgery, specific cardiac disorders, and cardiac medications), analysis of risk factors related to cardiac disease (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and tobacco use), and analysis of factors related to the reconstruction (selection of recipient vessels, type of reconstruction). The women were stratified based on age-50 to 59 years, 60 to 69 years, and older than 70 years-to analyze trends based on advancing age. Results demonstrated that the incidence of coronary artery disease was 2 in 240 women (0.8%) and that the incidence of factors related to cardiac function and the incidence of risk factors related to cardiac disease appear to increase with advancing age. The internal mammary vessels were used in 35 of 114 free tissue transfers with no adverse sequelae. No woman in whom the internal mammary artery was used has developed coronary artery disease. The 2 women with coronary artery disease were reconstructed with implants. Based on the results of this study, the author thinks that use of the internal mammary artery as a recipient vessel for microvascular reconstruction of the breast is justified. Options for future coronary revascularization would include the opposite internal mammary artery when available, a saphenous vein graft, or angioplasty.

Factors Associated with Anastomotic Failure after Microvascular Reconstruction of the Breast

The prevalence of anastomotic failure resulting in return to the operating room and flap necrosis after microvascular breast reconstruction ranges from 1 to 5 percent. The purpose of this study was to review a set of factors that may be associated with this occurrence. Microvascular reconstruction of the breast was performed in 198 women from January of 1998 to July of 2002. The mean age for all women was 47.7 years. There were 158 unilateral and 41 bilateral reconstructions, for a total of 240 flaps. The specific flaps included the free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap (n = 176), the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (n = 58), and the superior gluteal artery perforator flap (n = 6). Upon recognition of anastomotic failure, women were immediately returned to the operating room. Factors that were considered relevant to anastomotic failure included the choice of recipient vessel, timing of reconstruction, previous chest wall radiation therapy, previous axillary lymph node dissection, tobacco use, diabetes mellitus, patient age, and hematoma. Patient follow-up ranged from 5 to 59 months. Descriptive statistics, Fisher's exact test, and exact logistic regression were used for analyses and to summarize data. Of the 240 flaps, return to the operating room was necessary for 20 (8.3 percent), total necrosis occurred in nine (3.8 percent), and the rate of flap salvage was 55 percent (11 of 20 flaps). Venous occlusion was responsible for 16 of the 20 returns and eight of the nine failures. Statistical analysis demonstrated that both return to the operating room and flap necrosis were significantly associated with venous occlusion, delayed reconstruction, and hematoma. Previous lymph node dissection and previous radiation therapy had only a weak association with return to the operating room. The results of this study demonstrate that venous occlusion is responsible for return to the operating room and flap necrosis in the majority of cases. Age, tobacco use, choice of recipient vessel, and diabetes mellitus were not associated with anastomotic failure. The significance of delayed reconstruction may be related to its frequent association with previous lymph node dissection and/or radiation therapy resulting in perivascular fibrosis.

Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction Using Internal Mammary Perforator Branches as a Recipient Site: An Anatomical and Clinical Analysis

A variety of useful recipient sites exist for breast reconstruction with free flaps, and correct selection remains a significant decision for the surgeon. Among the main pedicles, the disadvantages of the internal mammary vessels are the necessity of costal cartilage resection and the impairment of future cardiac bypass. This study was designed to reduce morbidity and to seek alternative recipient vessels. In the anatomical part of the study, 32 parasternal regions from 16 fresh cadavers were used. The locations and components of internal mammary perforator branches were measured and a histomorphometric analysis was performed. In the clinical part of the study, 36 patients underwent 38 deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap and two superior gluteal artery perforator flap breast reconstructions (31 immediate and four bilateral). The recipient vessels were evaluated. In the anatomical study, there were 22 perforating vessels, with 14 (63.6 percent) on the second intercostal space and 11 (50 percent) with one artery and vein. The average (+/-SD) internal and external perforator artery diameters were 598.48 +/- 176.68 microm and 848.97 +/- 276.68 microm, respectively. In the clinical study, 13 successful anastomoses (32.5 percent) were performed at the internal mammary perforator branches (second and third intercostal spaces) with 12 DIEP flaps and one superior gluteal artery perforator flap (all performed as immediate reconstructions). One case of intraoperative vein thrombosis and one case of pedicle avulsion during flap molding were observed. The anatomic and clinical studies demonstrated that the internal mammary perforator branch as a recipient site is a further refinement to free flap breast reconstruction. However, it is neither a reproducible technique nor potentially applicable in all patients. Preoperative planning between the general surgeon and the plastic surgeon is crucial to preserve the main perforator branches during mastectomy. The procedure was not demonstrable in late reconstructions. The main advantages of internal mammary perforator branches used as recipient sites are sparing of the internal mammary vessels for a possible future cardiac surgery, prevention of thoracic deformities, and reduction of the operative time by limited dissection. Despite this, limited surgical exposure, caliber incompatibility, and technical difficulties have to be considered as the main restrictions.

Breast reconstruction in private practice

Comprehensive breast reconstruction can be performed in private practice. Our practice philosophy is that autogenous tissue provides the best substrate for breast reconstruction; the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap is our primary method of breast reconstruction. Microsurgical training and a group practice model permit routine use of all autogenous tissue techniques. Office, operating room, and hospital teams must be assembled; these teams follow clinical pathways, which make the execution of reconstructive procedures consistent and efficient. The practice must implement a plan for physician and patient education. The practice must review clinical outcomes, making adjustments in operative techniques and pre- and postoperative clinical pathways so that the best results can be achieved with a low complication rate. Breast reconstruction is a core service of our practice. We have accrued an economy of scale including these features: intraoperative and clinical efficiency, low practice overhead costs, and a high patient satisfaction rate.

The anatomical evaluation of internal mammary vessels using sonography and 2-dimensional computed tomography in Asians

The aim of this study is to get anatomical information on internal mammary vessels in Asians. Cadaver study is very limited in our country due to sociocultural backgrounds. We used two dimensional reconstructive computed tomography (2DCT) and Doppler ultrasound for anatomic study. The branching patterns, level of bifurcation, size of vessels and distance from the sternal edge to the internal mammary vein (IMv) were measured. This study was performed in 60 breast cancer patients from May 1999 to May 2001. Patient's age ranged from 30 to 63 years (average 46). One artery and one vein on both sides were the most common types that were observed in 44 of 60 patients. The diameter of the internal mammary artery (average 2.1 mm) was constant but that of the IMv had a wide variation (ranged 0.8-4.8 mm). The distance from sternum to internal mammary artery gradually decreased as it passed caudally. Compared to Caucasians, in Asians, the cases of IMv bifurcation were fewer. The level of IMv bifurcation was higher than that of Caucasian. The level of choice for anastomosis was 3rd intercostal space in Asians due to their shorter chest. The combination of 2DCT and Doppler ultrasound provided us with a useful preoperative information as well as general anatomical data in Asians.

Alternative venous outflow vessels in microvascular breast reconstruction

The lack of adequate recipient vessels often complicates microvascular breast reconstruction in patients who have previously undergone mastectomy and irradiation. In addition, significant size mismatch, particularly in the outflow veins, is an important contributor to vessel thrombosis and flap failure. The purpose of this study was to review the authors' experience with alternative venous outflow vessels for microvascular breast reconstruction. In a retrospective analysis of 1278 microvascular breast reconstructions performed over a 10-year period, the authors identified all patients in whom the external jugular or cephalic veins were used as the outflow vessels. Patient demographics, flap choice, the reasons for the use of alternative venous drainage vessels, and the incidence of microsurgical complications were analyzed. The external jugular was used in 23 flaps performed in procedures with 22 patients. The superior gluteal and transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flaps were used in the majority of the cases in which the external jugular vein was used (72 percent gluteal, 20 percent TRAM flap). The need for alternative venous outflow vessels was usually due to a significant vessel size mismatch between the superior gluteal and internal mammary veins (74 percent). For three of the external jugular vein flaps (13 percent), the vein was used for salvage after the primary draining vein thrombosed, and two of three flaps in these cases were eventually salvaged. In three patients, the external jugular vein thrombosed, resulting in two flap losses, while the third was salvaged using the cephalic vein. A total of two flaps were lost in the external jugular vein group. The cephalic vein was used in 11 flaps (TRAM, 64.3 percent; superior gluteal, 35.7 percent) performed in 11 patients. In five patients (54.5 percent), the cephalic vein was used to salvage a flap after the primary draining vein thrombosed; the procedure was successful in four cases. In three patients, the cephalic vein thrombosed, resulting in two flap losses. One patient suffered a thrombosis after the cephalic vein was used to salvage a flap in which the external jugular vein was initially used, leading to flap loss, while a second patient experienced cephalic vein thrombosis on postoperative day 7 while carrying a heavy package. There was only one minor complication attributable to the harvest of the external jugular or cephalic vein (small neck hematoma that was aspirated), and the resultant scars were excellent. The external jugular and cephalic veins are important ancillary veins available for microvascular breast reconstruction. The dissection of these vessels is straightforward, and their use is well tolerated and highly successful.

An outcome analysis comparing the thoracodorsal and internal mammary vessels as recipient sites for microvascular breast reconstruction: a prospective study of 100 patients

The thoracodorsal vessels have been the standard recipient vessels for the majority of surgeons performing free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap reconstructions. Recently, the internal mammary vessels have been recommended as the first-choice recipient vessels for microvascular breast reconstruction. This approach requires a shorter pedicle length, allows for central placement of flap tissue, and avoids axillary scarring. The use of the internal mammary vessels may provide for a shorter operative time and a higher-quality aesthetic reconstruction. The authors performed a prospective trial examining the differences in operative and aesthetic outcomes between each recipient site. A prospective trial of 108 consecutive free-tissue transfers was conducted in 100 patients. The first 60 TRAM flap patients were randomized so that 30 flaps were anastomosed to the internal mammary vessels and 30 were anastomosed to the thoracodorsal vessels, whereas the recipient vessels for the remaining 40 patients were left to the discretion of the surgeon. Of the 40 nonrandomized patients, 10 patients underwent reconstruction using the internal mammary vessels and 30 patients underwent reconstruction using the thoracodorsal vessels. The patients' medical history and hospital course were noted. To evaluate aesthetic outcome, a group of five blinded nonmedical observers and three blinded plastic surgeons graded the reconstructions in the 60 TRAM flap patients for symmetry and overall aesthetic result on a scale of 1 to 5. Blinded practitioners administered postoperative questionnaires to patients regarding recovery time and satisfaction with the aesthetic result. Forty-three flaps were transferred to the internal mammary vessels and 65 were transferred to the thoracodorsal vessels. No significant differences existed between groups with regard to age of preoperative risk factors. Average operative time was 6 hours in each group. Average hospital stay was 5.8 days in each group. Conversion from initial recipient vessel to a secondary recipient site occurred in 12.5 percent of internal mammary reconstructions and 7 percent of thoracodorsal reconstructions. All converted internal mammary cases occurred in left-sided reconstructions and were attributable to problems with the veins. Overall, 20 percent of left-sided internal mammary reconstructions were found to have an inadequate recipient vein. Unusable thoracodorsal vessels were found only in delayed reconstructions, at a rate of 15 percent in the delayed setting. All flaps from converted procedures survived without complications. Average follow-up was 20 months, during which time there was one flap loss in the thoracodorsal group. There were no significant differences in complication rates between groups. Average aesthetic grade was 3.6 in each group. Postoperative recovery time and overall patient satisfaction were not significantly different between groups. Either recipient site can provide for a safe and acceptable result; however, surgeons should be aware of conversion rates and plan appropriately if recipient vessels appear unusable for free-tissue transfer.

Extended TRAM flap: feasibility study on fresh human cadavers

The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of a superiorly based TRAM flap for breast reconstruction with its superior border abutting the inframammary fold. This flap would have a primary blood supply from the superior epigastric vessels, similar to a free flap attached to the mammary system. This flap, however, would not require microsurgery. Instead, it would have its superior epigastric pedicle lengthened by partial rib resection. Donor site closure would be accomplished by reverse abdominoplasty and the donor scar hidden in the inframammary fold. The surgical anatomy of such an extended TRAM flap (eTRAM) was investigated by cannulation of the internal mammary artery (IMA) in 10 fresh human cadavers bilaterally, injection with latex, and then dissection throughout its intrathoracic course. At the level of the third intercostal space, the mean external diameters of the right and left IMA were found to be 2.5 mm and 2.3 mm, respectively. The diameter of the vessel decreased until the IMA bifurcated into the superior epigastric artery and the musculophrenic artery, usually at the sixth intercostal space. The superior epigastric artery, having a mean diameter of 1.6 mm at its origin, descended caudally behind the seventh costal cartilage and could be followed until it entered the posterior rectus sheath and the rectus abdominis muscle. On its downward course, it was not embedded in the diaphragm muscle and was easily separated without violation of the thoracic cavity. From this anatomic study, it seems to be possible to raise an eTRAM after partial rib resection. Some technical considerations of such a flap are discussed. This modification of the TRAM would be helpful to surgeons commonly performing pedicled TRAM flaps and might extend its applicability beyond breast reconstruction to chest wall, intrathoracic, and head and neck reconstruction.

Use of internal mammary vessel perforator as a recipient vessel for free TRAM breast reconstruction

Breast reconstruction is a cosmetically critical procedure for women and it must be undertaken to balance the shape, size, and position of the breast with the other breast. Since the first introduction of the free abdominoplasty flap in 1979, the transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap technique has been a widely accepted method of breast reconstruction after mastectomy. In breast reconstruction with a free flap, the selection of suitable recipient vessels is the critical decision to be made by the surgeon. The most common recipient vessel for free flap breast reconstruction is the axillary system. However, when used as a recipient, the axillary system may limit flap movement and flexibility in breast shaping. The use of the internal mammary vessels as a recipient site attains ideal breast symmetry. However, the technique requires partial rib resection and eliminates the opportunity for a potential coronary artery bypass graft, which requires the internal mammary artery. Based on these considerations, the selection of suitable recipient vessels constitutes an important requirement for successful free tissue transfer. The authors have performed breast reconstruction with the TRAM flap anastomosed to the internal mammary perforator vessel and conclude that these perforators could be useful as recipient vessels, especially in the case of immediate breast reconstruction with the free TRAM flap.

Microvascular reconstruction of the breast

The growth of microsurgical procedures has led to significant technological, scientific, and clinical advances that have made these procedures safe, reliable, reproducible, and routine in most major medical centers. In many instances, free flap reconstruction has become the primary reconstructive method for many major defects, including breast reconstruction. The advantages of free flap breast reconstruction include better flap vascularity, broader patient selection, easier insetting of the flap, and decreased donor site morbidity. Free flap breast reconstruction can occur either at the time that the mastectomy is performed or as a delayed reconstruction following a previous mastectomy. Immediate reconstructions have the advantage of avoiding scar contracture and fibrosis within the mastectomy flaps and at the recipient vessel site. The most common recipient vessel sites are the thoracodorsal vessels and the internal mammary vessels. The thoracodorsal vessels are most frequently used in immediate reconstruction because they are partially exposed during the mastectomy procedure. The internal mammary vessels are used more frequently in delayed reconstructions, to avoid repeat surgery in the axilla. This recipient site also allows more medial placement of the reconstruction. Flap selections for free autogenous breast reconstruction include the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap, the superior gluteal myocutaneous flap, the inferior gluteal myocutaneous flap, the lateral thigh flap, and the deep circumflex iliac soft tissue flap (Rubens). The TRAM flap is most commonly used in free flap breast reconstruction. For patients with inadequate abdominal tissue or prior abdominal surgery, the superior gluteal flap is typically used. Both the TRAM flap and the superior gluteal flap can be designed as perforator flaps, preserving all of the involved muscle and, in the TRAM perforator, all the rectus fascia. These flaps are more technically demanding, with minimal impact on donor site function. The other flaps are less frequently used and limited to special patient circumstances. Free flap autogenous breast reconstruction provides a natural, long-lasting result with a high degree of patient satisfaction. Semin. Surg. Oncol. 19:264-271, 2000.

Use of circumflex scapular vessels as a recipient pedicle for autologous breast reconstruction: a report of 40 consecutive cases

The use of the circumflex scapular pedicle as a recipient vessel for breast reconstruction in a series of 40 consecutive cases in 37 patients is reported. There were 3 bilateral reconstructions and 34 unilateral reconstructions. Twenty-one cases were immediate reconstructions, and 19 cases were secondary reconstructions. The diameter of the artery varied from 1.5 mm to 3 mm and systematically matched with the diameter of the epigastric artery. The artery was a branch of the subscapular system in 82.5 percent of cases (33 of 40). In 17.5 percent of cases (7 of 40), the artery was a direct branch of the axillary artery. The length of available pedicle between the axillary vessel and the distal part where it can be divided (on its division between scapular and parascapular artery) was of 76 +/- 13 mm for the artery and 72 +/- 12 mm for the vein. The vein was unique in 77.5 percent of cases. The diameter was similar to the artery diameter when unique. There was a dual venous system in 21 of 40 cases (52.5 percent) but in 15 cases (37.5 percent), one of the two veins was dominant. In the seven cases for which the veins were dual and of equivalent diameter, the epigastric veins were also dual and allowed a second anastomosis. Clinically, the anastomosis was always possible on the artery. In one case of reconstruction after Halstedt mastectomy, no vein could be found, because all the veins had been ligated previously. One venous thrombosis (2.5 percent) and one arterial thrombosis were experienced. Both were treated by revised anastomoses and did not compromise late results. The circumflex scapular pedicle is a reliable and simple recipient site for breast reconstruction. It allows a unique site of dissection in immediate reconstruction and avoids division of the thoracodorsal pedicle. The technique is now used exclusively at this institution.

Internal mammary vessels as a model for power Doppler imaging of recipient vessels in microsurgery

The aim of this interdisciplinary study was to evaluate power Doppler imaging as a method of collecting reliable preoperative data concerning the diameters and topography of exemplary internal mammary vessels as recipient vessels in reconstructive microsurgery. Thirteen female patients (range, 37 to 58 years; mean, 45.6 years) were examined preoperatively with power Doppler imaging from the first to the fifth intercostal space parasternally and bilaterally. These data are compared with measurements obtained intraoperatively in each individual. Mean velocity in the artery in the second intercostal space on the right side is 47.11 cm/sec (range, 15 to 90 cm/sec) and on the left side is 42.25 cm/sec (range, 18 to 95 cm/sec). Mean velocity in the vein in the second intercostal space on the right side is 17.80 cm/sec (range, 10 to 30 cm/sec) and on the left side is 13.06 cm/sec (range, 5.3 to 32 cm/sec). The topographic results are in close agreement with intraoperative measurements and previous anatomical studies. Sonographic preoperative data of arteries (mean, 1.88 mm) show slightly smaller diameters than intraoperative measurements (mean, 2.08 mm), whereas veins show slightly larger diameters in sonography (mean, 2.33 mm) than intraoperatively (mean, 2.12 mm). Mean sonographic diameter of artery ranges from 2.14 mm (second intercostal space) to 1.46 mm (fifth intercostal space), of the vein from 2.76 (second intercostal space) to 1.25 mm (fifth intercostal space). In one case, a vein was not detectable. This noninvasive method leads to confirmation of the preoperative choice of the optimal recipient vessels for free tissue transfer and does not harm the patient.