An assessment of the reliability of the Scoliometer

Correction of idiopathic scoliosis using the H-frame system

To determine the effectiveness of posterior H-frame instrumentation for the surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis, 36 patients were studied. The patients underwent surgery between 1989 and 1993 and were evaluated for curve correction, hump correction, vertebral rotation, fusion level and complications. Average age at surgery was 19 years. Duration of follow-up averaged 2.5 years. Mean primary curve correction in patients with a King type I curve was 44.8% (n = 4) and in patients with a type II curve 67.3% (n = 9). Patients with King type III (n = 17) and IV (n = 6) curves achieved respective mean curve corrections of 67.8% and 63.9%. During follow-up there was a mean correction loss of 0.8% in type I, 5.4% in type II, 10.1% in type III and 2.4% in type IV curves. No significant derotation of the primary curves was noted. Rib hump correction and rotational changes of the unfused compensatory curves were significant. Fusion levels extended beyond L2 in six cases. Major neurological problems did not occur. Pseudoarthrosis developed in one patient and imbalance in two patients. The H-frame system satisfactorily achieves curve and rib hump correction with little correction loss.

Effectiveness of treatment with a brace in girls who have adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A prospective, controlled study based on data from the Brace Study of the Scoliosis Research Society

In a prospective study by the Scoliosis Research Society, 286 girls who had adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, a thoracic or thoracolumbar curve of 25 to 35 degrees, and a mean age of twelve years and seven months (range, ten to fifteen years) were followed to determine the effect of treatment with observation only (129 patients), an underarm plastic brace (111 patients), and nighttime surface electrical stimulation (forty-six patients). Thirty-nine patients were lost to follow-up, leaving 247 (86 per cent) who were followed until maturity or who were dropped from the study because of failure of the assigned treatment. The end point of failure of treatment was defined as an increase in the curve of at least 6 degrees, from the time of the first roentgenogram, on two consecutive roentgenograms. As determined with use of this end point, treatment with a brace failed in seventeen of the 111 patients; observation only, in fifty-eight of the 129 patients; and electrical stimulation, in twenty-two of the forty-six patients. According to survivorship analysis, treatment with a brace was associated with a success rate of 74 per cent (95 per cent confidence interval, 52 to 84) at four years; observation only, with a success rate of 34 per cent (95 per cent confidence interval, 16 to 49); and electrical stimulation, with a success rate of 33 per cent (95 per cent confidence interval, 12 to 60).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)