The deleterious effect of donor high plasma sodium and extended preservation in liver transplantation. A multivariate analysis

Utilization of extended donor criteria liver allografts maximizes donor use and patient access to liver transplantation

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of systematic utilization of extended donor criteria liver allografts (EDC), including living donor allografts (LDLT), on patient access to liver transplantation (LTX).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Utilization of liver allografts that do not meet traditional donor criteria (EDC) offer immediate expansion of the donor pool. EDC are typically allocated by transplant center rather than regional wait-list priority (RA). This single-institution series compares outcomes of EDC and RA allocation to determine the impact of EDC utilization on donor use and patient access to LTX.

METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of 99 EDC recipients (49 deceased donor, 50 LDLT) and 116 RA recipients from April 2001 through April 2004. Deceased-donor EDC included: age >65 years, donation after cardiac death, positive viral serology (hepatitis C, hepatitis B core antibody, human T-cell lymphotrophic), split-liver, hypernatremia, prior carcinoma, steatosis, and behavioral high-risk donors. Outcome variables included patient and graft survival, hospitalization, initial graft function, and complication categorized as: biliary, vascular, wound, and other.

RESULTS

EDC recipients were more frequently diagnosed with hepatitis C virus or hepatocellular carcinoma and had a lower model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score at LTX (P < 0.01). Wait-time, technical complications, and hospitalization were comparable. Log-rank analysis of Kaplan-Meier survival estimates demonstrated no difference in patient or graft survival; however, deaths among deceased-donor EDC recipients were frequently the result of patient comorbidities, whereas LDLT and RA deaths resulted from graft failure (P < 0.01). EDC increased patient access to LTX by 77% and reduced pre-LTX mortality by over 50% compared with regional data (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Systematic EDC utilization maximizes donor use, increases access to LTX, and significantly reduces wait-list mortality by providing satisfactory outcomes to select recipients.

Using root cause analysis to improve survival in a liver transplant program

BACKGROUND

With the advent of programs such as the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, surgical services will be compared with their peers across the United States. At times, many programs will experience lower-than-expected outcomes. During July 1, 1998, to June 30, 2000 our 1-year graft (76.86%, P = 0.23) and patient (80.61%, P = 0.016) survivals after liver transplantation were lower than our expected rates (graft 81.89% and patient 88.3%), according to the U.S. Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR).

METHODS

We used aggregate root cause analysis to determine underlying reasons for our patient deaths. Two of our surgeons performed a systematic review of all our center's liver transplant patient deaths from January 1, 1995, to December 31, 2000. Each phase of the transplant process was reviewed.

RESULTS

Of 355 patients receiving their first transplant, there were 90 deaths, with 188 root causes identified. The apportionment according to phase of the transplant process was patient selection, 50%; transplant procedure, 17%; donor selection, 15%; post-transplant care, 8%, and psychosocial issues, 10%. Risk reduction action plans were developed, and several important changes made in our care protocol. In April 2004, SRTR data revealed that for patients transplanted between January 1, 2001 and June 30, 2003, our 1-year liver graft survival of 90.73% (P = 0.018) was significantly higher than the national expected rate of 84.48%. Our 1-year patient survival rate of 92.66% (P = 0.285) was higher than the expected rate of 89.29%.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower-than-expected outcomes can provide an impetus for improving patient care and raising the quality of a surgical service. Aggregate root cause analysis of adverse events is a valuable method for program improvement.

Impact of Donor Serum Sodium Levels on Outcome After Heart Transplantation

We investigated the impact of elevated donor serum sodium levels on outcome after heart transplantation in 336 consecutive heart transplantations. Mean donor serum sodium was 148.2+/-10.2 mmol/liter (range 116 to 180 mmol/liter). Recipients were divided into 4 groups with serum sodium levels of 141, 147 and 155 mmol/liter, resulting in sodium levels of: 133+/-6.1 mmol/liter for Quartile A; 144+/-4.2 mmol/liter for Quartile B; 151+/-4.3 mmol/liter for Quartile C; and 162+/-6.6 mmol/liter for Quartile D, respectively (mean+/- standard deviation). Mean occurrence of primary graft failure (PGF) was 3.6% with the following quartile breakdown: A, 3.6%; B, 4.8%; C, 3.6%; and D, 2.4% (p=non-significant [NS]). Mean 5-year survival was 81.32% with: A, 83.51%; B, 76.03%; C, 80.47%; and D, 85.25% (p=NS). Coronary allograft vasculopathy (CAV) occurred in 19% of patients with a quartile breakdown of: A, 16.5%; B, 21%; C, 20%; and D, 14.5% (p=NS). No impact of donor serum sodium levels was seen on early post-operative results or on long-term outcome, indicating that cardiac allografts from donors with elevated sodium levels may be transplanted successfully with favorable results.

Preharvest donor hyperoxia predicts good early graft function and longer graft survival after liver transplantation

A total of 44 donor/recipient perioperative and intraoperative variables were prospectively analyzed in 89 deceased-donor liver transplantations classified as initial good graft function (IGGF) or initial poor graft function (IPGF) according to a scoring system based on values obtained during the 1st 72 postoperative hours from the serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) concentration, bile output, and prothrombin activity. The IGGF compared with the IPGF group showed: 1) longer graft (P = .002) and patient (P = .0004) survival; 2) at univariate analysis, a higher (mean [95% confidence interval]) preharvest donor arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO(2)) (152 [136-168] and 104 [91-118] mmHg, respectively; P = .0008) and arterial hemoglobin oxygen saturation (97.9 [97.2-98.7] and 96.7 [95.4-98.0]%, respectively; P = .0096), a lower percentage of donors older than 65 years (13 and 33%, respectively; P = .024), a lower percentage of donors treated with noradrenaline (16 and 41%, respectively; P = .012). At multivariate analysis, IGGF was associated positively with donor PaO(2) and negatively with donor age greater than 65 years and with donor treatment with noradrenaline. Independently from the grouping according to initial graft function, graft survival was longer when donor PaO(2) was >150 mmHg than when donor PaO(2) was < or =150 mmHg (P = .045). In conclusion, preharvest donor hyperoxia predicts IGGF and longer graft survival.

Factors during donor care that may affect liver transplantation outcome

Publications are reviewed that identify factors during donor care and characteristics of the donor liver that may be associated with outcome following liver transplantation. The procurement coordinator has the opportunity to influence cold ischemia time, blood pressure, the serum sodium concentration and, perhaps, liver glycogen reserves. These variables may significantly affect postimplantation graft performance and graft or recipient survival. Summaries of those publications comprising this database are presented, and several limitations in their interpretation are discussed.

Predictive factors for early mortality following liver transplantation

AIMS

To retrospectively review our liver transplant performance to identify factors that influenced early outcomes and to prospectively test their validity in predicting outcomes.

METHODS

Clinical records from 190 patients with liver transplants (LT; n = 200) performed between 1991 and 1997 were reviewed and the data evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses regarding clinical outcome. The prognostic model thus obtained was prospectively evaluated in 55 patients undergoing transplant between 1999 and 2000.

RESULTS

Main indication for transplant was post-necrotic cirrhosis (61%), mostly HCV(+). The majority of patients were Child-Pugh C status (46%). Post-operative mortality at 3 months was 15.3%. Risk factors predicting death were: Child-Pugh C status (OR 1.3), pre-LT renal insufficiency (OR 5.8), malnutrition (OR 2.9) and technically complex surgery requiring cross-clamping with or without bypass (OR 4.9). None of the donor factors was significant. Prospectively applied to predict outcome in the 55 patients, the model had a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 88.8% with a higher-than-anticipated accuracy with a positive predictive value of 61.5% and a negative predictive value of 95.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-LT renal insufficiency is the most significant risk factor for early mortality and suggests that LT should be performed before evidence of irreversible renal insufficiency becomes manifest.

The effect of hypernatremia on liver allografts in rats

Hypernatremia in the donor organ is one of the most dangerous risk factors that may cause primary graft loss after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). However, the viability of donor grafts from acute hypernatremic donors, which is likely to occur during resuscitation of trauma patients with hypertonic saline solution, has not been studied precisely. In the present study, we sought to evaluate whether the hypernatremia, per se, induced by hypertonic saline solution, affects the outcome of liver transplantation in the normal rat. Thirty minutes after the induction of hypernatremia (>160 mEq/L), the livers of nine Wistar rats were removed under ether anesthesia. Six livers were immediately transplanted into normal Wistar rats, whereas the other three were preserved in 4 degrees C University of Wisconsin solution for 6 h before transplantation in the recipients. Liver function variables of the donor rats at graft procurement and of the recipients at Day 7 after OLT were compared with a control group. The water content of the graft at procurement and the survival of the recipients at 7 days after OLT were, likewise, compared with the untreated control group. Results showed that there were no significant differences in the liver function tests of the donors and recipients, as well as in the water content of the grafts, between groups. All the rats survived the observation period of 7 days. This study showed that acute hypernatremia induced by the infusion of 10% saline solution before graft procurement in a nonbrain-dead donor rat model did not lead to a deterioration of liver graft viability after OLT.

IMPLICATIONS

Hypernatremia in cadaveric donors may be detrimental to the graft in clinical liver transplantation, but acute donor hypernatremia induced by an IV infusion of 10% saline solution before graft procurement in nonbrain-dead rats did not affect the survival of the recipient rats in an experimental liver transplantation model.

Split liver transplantation and risk to the adult recipient: analysis using matched pairs

BACKGROUND

The technique of liver splitting is an effective way of increasing the donor pool and reducing pediatric waiting list mortality. But the procedure is still not fully accepted because of concerns that it may cause complications in adult recipients.

STUDY DESIGN

Fifty-nine adult recipients of primary extended right split liver transplantations (SLTs) were matched to recipients of whole liver transplantations (WLTs) according to the following criteria: 1) United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) status, 2) donor age, 3) recipient age, 4) total cold ischemic time, 5) indication for liver transplantation, 6) Child-Pugh class, and 7) year of transplantation. A WLT-recipient match was identified in 40 adult recipients of primary SLT.

RESULTS

Fifteen percent of the recipients in our study were highly urgent cases (UNOS 1), and 85% were UNOS status 3-4. The 3- and 12-month patient survival rates after SLT and WLT were 82.5% and 77.1%, and 92.5% and 87.5%, respectively (log rank p = 0.358). The 3- and 12-month graft survival rates showed no significant difference in either group (80% and 74% in SLT and 87.5% and 77.4% in WLT [log rank p = 0.887]). The rates of primary nonfunction, primary poor function, biliary and vascular complications, intra- and postoperative blood transfusion, and intensive care stay were comparable for SLT and WLT.

CONCLUSIONS

SLT, using the extended right hepatic lobe, does not notably differ from WLT with regard to initial graft function, postoperative complications, or patient and graft survival. Based on this, the liver can be considered a paired organ, and mandatory splitting of good-quality livers can be recommended.

Heme oxygenase-1 overexpression protects rat livers from ischemia/reperfusion injury with extended cold preservation

This study analyzes the effects and mechanisms of heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1)-mediated cytoprotection in rat livers exposed to cold preservation. In the first series, rats were pretreated with cobalt protoporphyrin (CoPP) or zinc protoporphyrin (ZnPP), HO-1 inducer and antagonist, respectively. Livers were stored at 4 degrees C for 24 h, and then perfused ex vivo for 2 h. Livers pretreated with CoPP had significantly higher portal venous blood flow and increased total bile production, as compared with the ZnPP group. This correlated with histologic (Banff) criteria of hepatocyte injury/liver function. In the second series, rat livers were stored at 4 degrees C for 24 h or 40 h, and then transplanted into syngeneic recipients. After 24 h of preservation, 80% of rats bearing CoPP-pretreated liver grafts survived 21 days (vs. 50% in controls). After 40h of cold preservation, liver transplant survival at day 1, 7 and 21 for the CoPP group was: 100%, 71% and 57%, respectively (vs. 50%, 50% and 33% in controls). This correlated with improved hepatic function/histologic (Suzuki) criteria of hepatocyte injury after HO-1 overexpression (immunohistology/Western blots) by infiltrating macrophages. This study documents the potential utility of HO-1-inducing agents in preventing ischemia/reperfusion injury resulting from prolonged storage of liver transplants.

Extended preservation of rat liver graft by induction of heme oxygenase-1

Livers can be preserved only for a short period without jeopardizing the transplantation outcome. Heat shock proteins (HSPs) protect against ischemia and reperfusion injury. We studied whether their induction and, in particular, the induction of heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1), improves transplantation survival after an extended time of cold storage. Rats were subjected to heat preconditioning (42 degrees C for 20 minutes). Livers were harvested 24 hours later, preserved in cold University of Wisconsin solution for 44 hours, and transplanted in isogeneic rats (arterialized transplantation). HO-1 was specifically induced and inhibited by cobalt protoporphyrin and tin protoporphyrin, respectively. All animals receiving a graft without preconditioning and subjected to 44 hours of cold preservation died within 3 days, whereas 89% of rats who received a graft exposed to heat survived for 3 weeks (P =.0004). Preconditioning reduced serum aspartate transaminase (AST) and lactate dehydrogenase activities after reperfusion, improved bile flow, and decreased the histologic lesions of reperfusion injury. These significant effects of heat preconditioning were prevented by administration of tin protoporphyrin and could be reproduced by administration of cobalt protoporphyrin. In grafts without preconditioning, only a small fraction (<5%) of hepatocytes were positive with the terminal deoxynucleotide transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) assay, and even less expressed activated caspase 3. Preconditioning tended to reduce the number of positive cells and to stimulate the expression of antiapoptotic Bcl-X(L). In conclusion, heat preconditioning and, specifically, overexpression of HO-1 improve posttransplantation survival and graft function after prolonged cold ischemia preservation. The mechanism underlying these beneficial effects does not appear to be prevention of apoptosis.

Multivariate regression analysis on early mortality after orthotopic liver transplantation

AIM

To identify the risk factors relating to early mortality after orthotopic liver transplantation.

METHODS

Clinical data of 37 adult patients undergoing liver transplantation were retrospectively collected and divided into two groups: the survived group and the death group (survival time<30 d). The relationship between multivariate risk factors and early mortality after orthotopic liver transplantation were analyzed by stepwise logistic regression.

RESULTS

The survival rate was 73%. Early mortality rate was 27%. APACAE III, preoperative serum creatinine level and interoperative bleeding quantity had a significant independent association with early mortality. (R=0.1841, 0.2056 and 0.3738).

CONCLUSION

APACHE III,preoperative serum creatinine level and interoperative bleeding quantity are significant risk factors relating to early mortality after orthotopic liver transplantation. To improve the recipient's preoperative critical condition and renal function and to reduce interoperative bleeding quantity could lower the early mortality after orthotopic liver transplantation.

A 10-year experience of liver transplantation for hepatitis C: analysis of factors determining outcome in over 500 patients

OBJECTIVE

To determine the factors affecting the outcome of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for end-stage liver disease caused by hepatitis C virus (HCV) and to identify models that predict patient and graft survival.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The national epidemic of HCV infection has become the leading cause of hepatic failure that requires OLT. Rapidly increasing demands for OLT and depleted donor organ pools mandate appropriate selection of patients and donors. Such selection should be guided by a better understanding of the factors that influence the outcome of OLT.

METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective review of 510 patients who underwent OLT for HCV during the past decade. Seven donor, 10 recipient, and 2 operative variables that may affect outcome were dichotomized at the median for univariate screening. Factors that achieved a probability value less than 0.2 or that were thought to be relevant were entered into a stepdown Cox proportional hazard regression model.

RESULTS

Overall patient and graft survival rates at 1, 5, and 10 years were 84%, 68%, and 60% and 73%, 56%, and 49%, respectively. Overall median time to HCV recurrence was 34 months after transplantation. Neither HCV recurrence nor HCV-positive donor status significantly decreased patient and graft survival rates by Kaplan-Meier analysis. However, use of HCV-positive donors reduced the median time of recurrence to 22.9 months compared with 35.7 months after transplantation of HCV-negative livers. Stratification of patients into five subgroups, based on time of recurrence, revealed that early HCV recurrence was associated with significantly increased rates of patient death and graft loss. Donor, recipient, and operative variables that may affect OLT outcome were analyzed. On univariate analysis, recipient age, serum creatinine, donor length of hospital stay, donor female gender, United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) status of recipient, and presence of hepatocellular cancer affected the outcome of OLT. Elevation of pretransplant HCV RNA was associated with an increased risk of graft loss. Of 15 variables considered by multivariate Cox regression analysis, recipient age, UNOS status, donor gender, and log creatinine were simultaneous significant predictors for patient survival. Simultaneously significant factors for graft failure included log creatinine, log alanine transaminase, log aspartate transaminase, UNOS status, donor gender, and warm ischemia time. These variables were therefore entered into prognostic models for patient and graft survival.

CONCLUSION

The earlier the recurrence of HCV, the greater the impact on patient and graft survival. The use of HCV-positive donors may accelerate HCV recurrence, and they should be used judiciously. Patient survival at the time of transplantation is predicted by donor gender, UNOS status, serum creatinine, and recipient age. Graft survival is affected by donor gender, warm ischemia time, and pretransplant patient condition. The authors' current survival prognostic models require further multicenter validation.

Desmopressin impairs microcirculation in donor pancreas and early graft function after experimental pancreas transplantation

BACKGROUND

Protective effects of desmopressin in brain dead organ donors oppose reports on a hypercoagulatory potential and an increased leukocyte-endothelial interaction (LEI) after application of the drug. The aim was to evaluate the effect of desmopressin on organ donor's pancreas and early graft function.

METHODS

Donor microcirculation was evaluated via intra-vital microscopy (IVM) in 24 BR (di/di) rats with central diabetes insipidus, randomly assigned to groups I (control without desmopressin application), II (single i.v. application, no pretreatment) or group III (single i.v. desmopressin application, s.c. pretreatment for 3 days). Microcirculation in recipients was evaluated 1 hr and 6 hr after syngenic pancreas transplantation. Groups III and I served as organ donors. After IVM specimens were taken for histology and immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Desmopressin in II vs. I led to temporarily (30') increased LEI (Sticker 274.3+/-87.7 vs. 76.5+/-31.1/mm2 endothelial surface; P<0.01) and impaired microcirculation (MCEV 0.43+/-0.07 vs. 0.99+/-0.06 mm/s; P<0.01). Repeated application reduced MCEV and increased LEI for up to 12 hr. Histology in I vs. III showed increased inflammation (n.s.), necrosis (P<0.05) and vacuolization (P<0.01). Immunohistochemistry revealed increased endothelial P-selectin 20' after application. 6 hr after reperfusion organs from III showed reduced MCEV and increased LEI (P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Repeated application of desmopressin impairs graft microcirculation. Perfusion of the pancreas is significantly reduced at the beginning of organ tissue conservation as well as after reperfusion. These disturbances might partly be due to observed endothelial P-selectin expression. Application of desmopressin up to 12 hr prior to organ explantation may impact graft quality.

The impact of donor age on liver transplantation: influence of donor age on early liver function and on subsequent patient and graft survival

BACKGROUND

The urgent need to increase the organ donor pool has led to the expansion of criteria for donor selection. The aim of this study was to analyze the influence of donor age on early graft function, subsequent graft loss, and mortality after liver transplantation (LT).

METHODS

Data on LT were evaluated retrospectively in a population-based cohort of 400 LTs in 348 patients. Of these, 21 (5%) were from donors >70 years old. Pretransplantation donor and recipient characteristics and the evolution of recipients were analyzed. The influence of donor age as a risk factor was assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Actuarial graft survival was 89% at 1 month after LT, 81% after 6 months, and 59% after 60 months. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that only donor age (>70 years old) was associated with a higher risk of long-term graft loss (relative risk [RR]=1.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1-1.9; P=0.03) and mortality (RR=1.7, 95% CI=1.2-2.3; P=0.01). Graft survival of septuagenarian livers was 80% at 1 month after LT, 56% after 6 months, and 25% after 54 months. Actuarial survival analysis (Kaplan-Meier curves) also demonstrated worse evolution in recipients of livers from old donors (log-rank test, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Advanced donor age is associated with lower graft and recipient survival.

Predictors of survival after In vivo split liver transplantation: analysis of 110 consecutive patients

OBJECTIVE

To determine the factors that influence patient survival after in vivo split liver transplantation (SLT).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Split liver transplantation is effective in expanding the donor pool, and its use reduces the number of deaths in patients awaiting orthotopic liver transplantation. Early SLTs were associated with poor outcomes, and acceptance of the technique has been slow. A better understanding of the factors that influence patient and graft survival would be useful in widening the application of SLT.

METHODS

During a 3.5-year period, 55 right and 55 left lateral in vivo split grafts were transplanted in 102 pediatric and adult recipients. The authors' in vivo split technique has been previously described. Median follow-up was 14.5 months. Recipient, donor, and surgical variables were analyzed for their effect on patient survival after SLT.

RESULTS

Overall survival rates of patients who received an SLT were not significantly different from those of patients who received whole organ transplants. Survival of left lateral segment recipients, at median follow-up time, was 76% versus 80% in patients receiving a trisegment. Fifty of 102 patients (49%) were high-risk urgent recipients (United Network for Organ Sharing [UNOS] status 1 and 2A) and 52 (51%) were nonurgent recipients (UNOS status 2B, 3). High-risk recipients had a survival rate significantly lower than that of nonurgent recipients. By univariate comparison, two variables-UNOS status and number of transplants per patient-were significantly associated with an increased risk of death. Preoperative recipient mechanical ventilation, preoperative prothrombin time, donor sodium level, donor length of hospital stay, and warm ischemia time approached significance. The type of graft (right vs. left) did not reduce the survival rate after transplantation. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified UNOS status and length of donor hospital stay as independent predictors of survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient survival of in vivo SLT is not significantly different from that of whole-organ orthotopic liver transplantation. The variables affecting outcome of in vivo SLT are similar to those in whole-organ transplantation. in vivo SLT should be widely applied to expand a severely depleted donor pool.

Influence of high donor serum sodium levels on early postoperative graft function in human liver transplantation: effect of correction of donor hypernatremia

Donor hypernatremia was reported to cause postoperative graft dysfunction in human orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). However, the effects of the correction of donor hypernatremia before organ procurement have not been confirmed. The aim of this study is to determine whether donor hypernatremia is associated with early graft dysfunction after OLT and to determine the effect of the correction of donor hypernatremia. One hundred eighty-one consecutive OLTs performed between May 1997 and July 1998 were entered onto this study. The cases were divided into three groups according to the donor serum sodium concentration: group A, serum sodium of 155 mEq/L or less before organ procurement (n = 118); group B, peak sodium greater than 155 mEq/L and final sodium 155 mEq/L or less (n = 36); and group C, final sodium greater than 155 mEq/L (n = 27). Graft survival within 90 days after OLT and early postoperative graft function were analyzed. There were no significant differences in donor and recipient variables among the three groups. The frequencies of graft loss were 15 of 118 grafts (12.7%) in group A, 4 of 36 grafts (11.1%) in group B, and 9 of 27 grafts (33.3%; P <.05 v groups A and B) in group C. The liver enzyme values in groups B and C were significantly greater than those in group A postoperatively. The prothrombin times of group C were significantly longer than those of group A for the first 4 postoperative days. Recipients of hepatic allografts from donors with uncorrected hypernatremia had a significantly greater incidence of graft loss compared with recipients of hepatic allografts from normonatremic donors. However, the differences in graft survival were abrogated by the correction of donor hypernatremia before procurement.

Early allograft dysfunction after liver transplantation: a definition and predictors of outcome. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Liver Transplantation Database

BACKGROUND

Poor graft function early after liver transplantation is an important cause of morbidity and mortality. We defined early allograft dysfunction (EAD) using readily available indices of function and identified donor, graft, and pretransplant recipient factors associated with this outcome.

METHODS

This study examined 710 adult recipients of a first, single-organ liver transplantation for non-fulminant liver disease at three United States centers. EAD was defined by the presence of at least one of the following between 2 and 7 days after liver transplantation: serum bilirubin >10 mg/dl, prothrombin time (PT) > or =17 sec, and hepatic encephalopathy.

RESULTS

EAD incidence was 23%. Median intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stays were longer for recipients with EAD than those without (4 days vs. 3 days, P = 0.0001; 24 vs. 15 days, P = 0.0001, respectively). Three-year recipient and graft survival were worse in those with EAD than in those without (68% vs. 83%, P = .0001; 61% vs. 79%, P = 0.0001). A logistic regression model combining donor, graft, and recipient factors predicted EAD better than models examining these factors in isolation. Pretransplant recipient elevations in PT and bilirubin, awaiting a graft in hospital or ICU, donor age > or =50 years, donor hospital stay >3 days, preprocurement acidosis, and cold ischemia time > or =15 hr were independently associated with EAD.

CONCLUSION

Recipients who develop EAD have longer ICU and hospital stays and greater mortality than those without. Donor, graft, and recipient risk factors all contribute to the development of EAD. Results of these analyses identify factors that, if modified, may alter the risk of EAD.