Low rate of acute lung allograft rejection after the use of daclizumab, an interleukin 2 receptor antibody

Acute allograft rejection after lung transplantation: diagnosis and therapy

Acute rejection remains a significant problem after lung transplantation. While it generally is a treatable condition, significant resources and therapies are directed toward its prevention and resolution. Its larger significance undoubtedly rests in its contribution to the pathogenesis of BOS. Significant questions regarding the origins of AR, the role of LBB, alternative histologic appearances of acute allograft injury, and optimal therapy remain. Controversy regarding the utility of surveillance bronchoscopy and preemptive treatment of occult AR persists because of lack of conclusive evidence. Future investigations might resolve these matters and provide more efficacious and less toxic therapies that will hopefully reduce the impact of chronic rejection and improve long-term outcomes.

Combination prophylaxis with ganciclovir and cytomegalovirus (CMV) immune globulin after lung transplantation: effective CMV prevention following daclizumab induction

Despite the serious direct and indirect deleterious effects caused by cytomegalovirus (CMV), the optimal prophylactic strategy remains unknown. We sought to determine whether combination prophylaxis using intravenous ganciclovir (GCV) and CMV-IVIG reduced the incidence of CMV compared to GCV alone. Donor CMV positive/recipient negative (D+/R-) patients received GCV (6 weeks i.v. + 6 weeks oral) and CMV-IVIG (every 2 weeks for 7 doses), while R+ patients received GCV (2 weeks i.v. + 4 weeks oral) and CMV-IVIG (every 2 weeks for 3 doses). The group receiving combination prophylaxis (GpA) was compared to a historical, case-controlled group receiving GCV alone (GpB). Groups were matched by CMV donor/recipient serology, pretransplant diagnosis, age, and sex in reverse chronological order. Cyclosporine, azathioprine, and prednisone were used in both groups. Additionally, GpA received daclizumab induction therapy. Groups were compared as to the incidence of CMV disease, CMV infection, and acute rejection (AR). In GpA, 38 patients were evaluable and matched to 48 patients in GpB. Three GpA patients (8%) (2 D+/R-) developed CMV disease vs. 16 patients (33%) in GpB, p = 0.0077, Fisher's exact. There was also a trend toward a delay in CMV onset (148 days in GpA vs. 92 days in GpB, p = 0.07, Mann-Whitney). CMV infection did not occur in GpA, and one case occurred in GpB. There was no difference in the incidence of AR (66% in GpA vs. 79% in GpB, p = 0.22, Fisher's exact) or the need for cytolytic therapy between groups. Despite the use of daclizumab induction therapy, combination prophylaxis with GCV and CMV-IVIG reduced the incidence and probably delayed the onset of CMV infection compared to GCV alone. Longer follow-up will be needed to evaluate the impact of combination therapy on the incidence of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS).

The impact of novel immunosuppressive agents on infections in organ transplant recipients and the interactions of these agents with antimicrobials

Several of the new immunosuppressive agents that are used to treat transplant recipients possess in vitro activity against specific pathogens, enhance the activity of antimicrobial agents, or have unique drug interactions with antimicrobial agents. Mycophenolate mofetil may have a protective effect against Pneumocystis carinii; it also enhances the activity of ganciclovir and has strong antiviral activity against human immunodeficiency virus type 1. High doses of mycophenolate mofetil have been associated with a higher frequency of tissue-invasive cytomegalovirus disease but not with asymptomatic cytomegalovirus infection. Rapamycin exhibits potent in vitro fungicidal activity against Cryptococcus neoformans and several pathogenic fungi in transplant recipients; however, it is not known whether its immunosuppressive effect in organ transplant recipients outweighs its antifungal activity. Recognition of the unique characteristics of these agents and the evolving spectrum of opportunistic infections has implications for the differential diagnosis, management, and prophylaxis of infections in organ transplant recipients in the modern immunosuppressive era.

Perioperative care of the lung transplant patient

Improvements in the perioperative management of lung transplant recipients have produced a 90% survival in the first 30 days following surgery. Detailed attention to donor organ procurement and preservation of the allograft are important in ensuring an early successful outcome. Early antibacterial administration based on donor or pretransplant cultures and antiviral therapy in CMV-negative recipients assist in avoiding early infectious complications. Development of hypoxemia or hemodynamic instability in the perioperative period requires a rapid, systematic evaluation with attention to mechanical, immunologic, or infectious causes. Nonpulmonary complications are not infrequent in lung transplant recipients.