Management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: 2006 position statement of The North American Menopause Society

Cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women

BACKGROUND

The best strategies to screen postmenopausal women for osteoporosis are not clear.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the cost-effectiveness of various screening strategies.

DESIGN

Individual-level state-transition cost-effectiveness model.

DATA SOURCES

Published literature.

TARGET POPULATION

U.S. women aged 55 years or older.

TIME HORIZON

Lifetime.

PERSPECTIVE

Payer.

INTERVENTION

Screening strategies composed of alternative tests (central dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry [DXA], calcaneal quantitative ultrasonography [QUS], and the Simple Calculated Osteoporosis Risk Estimation [SCORE] tool) initiation ages, treatment thresholds, and rescreening intervals. Oral bisphosphonate treatment was assumed, with a base-case adherence rate of 50% and a 5-year on/off treatment pattern.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (2010 U.S. dollars per quality-adjusted life-year [QALY] gained).

RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS

At all evaluated ages, screening was superior to not screening. In general, quality-adjusted life-days gained with screening tended to increase with age. At all initiation ages, the best strategy with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of less than $50,000 per QALY was DXA screening with a T-score threshold of -2.5 or less for treatment and with follow-up screening every 5 years. Across screening initiation ages, the best strategy with an ICER less than $50,000 per QALY was initiation of screening at age 55 years by using DXA -2.5 with rescreening every 5 years. The best strategy with an ICER less than $100,000 per QALY was initiation of screening at age 55 years by using DXA with a T-score threshold of -2.0 or less for treatment and then rescreening every 10 years. No other strategy that involved treatment of women with osteopenia had an ICER less than $100,000 per QALY. Many other strategies, including strategies with SCORE or QUS prescreening, were also cost-effective, and in general the differences in effectiveness and costs between evaluated strategies was small.

RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

Probabilistic sensitivity analysis did not reveal a consistently superior strategy.

LIMITATIONS

Data were primarily from white women. Screening initiation at ages younger than 55 years were not examined. Only osteoporotic fractures of the hip, vertebrae, and wrist were modeled.

CONCLUSION

Many strategies for postmenopausal osteoporosis screening are effective and cost-effective, including strategies involving screening initiation at age 55 years. No strategy substantially outperforms another.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

National Center for Research Resources.

Consensus statements on osteoporosis diagnosis, prevention, and management in the Philippines

OBJECTIVE

The consensus statements were developed to assist healthcare practitioners in providing optimal care to postmenopausal individuals at risk for osteoporosis and fragility fractures in the local setting.

METHODOLOGY

The Technical Review Committee formed by the Osteoporosis Society of the Philippines Foundation Inc. in cooperation with the Philippine Orthopedic Association drafted, retrieved available published evidence, and appraised important issues on osteoporosis and fragility fractures. The Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation instrument was used to appraise published guidelines while a systematic way of validating the quality of evidence and the level of recommendation was done using the GRADE system. A multidisciplinary panel of experts and stakeholders in an en banc meeting conferred and approved the recommendations.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

There were five key issues on preventive, seven on diagnostic, nine on therapeutic aspects of osteoporosis with four other surgical concerns on fragility fractures. All were approved by a panel of stakeholders through a majority vote. These statements will best inform the clinicians and the specialists including orthopedic surgeons and general care practitioners on issues of postmenopausal Filipino women at risk for osteoporosis and fragility fractures.

Bazedoxifene: a new selective estrogen receptor modulator for postmenopausal osteoporosis

An ongoing need for safe and effective pharmacological therapies exists for postmenopausal osteoporosis, which imposes a significant burden on both women and the health-care system. Bazedoxifene is a novel selective estrogen receptor modulator with a unique tissue-selectivity profile. In phase 3 clinical trials of nearly 10,000 postmenopausal women, bazedoxifene was shown to significantly reduce the risk of new vertebral fracture versus placebo, with favourable effects on bone mineral density, bone turnover markers and the lipid profile. Moreover, in a subgroup of women at increased risk of fracture, bazedoxifene significantly decreased non-vertebral fracture risk versus both placebo and raloxifene. Bazedoxifene has been shown to be safe and well tolerated, with no evidence of endometrial or breast stimulation. These data suggest that bazedoxifene may offer significant clinical benefit for postmenopausal women with or at risk of developing osteoporosis, which may subsequently lessen the medical and economic burden of this disease.

The effect of breast-feeding duration on bone mineral density in postmenopausal Turkish women: a population-based study

INTRODUCTION

In the present study, we investigated the effects of breast-feeding time on bone mineral density (BMD) later in life.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The current study was based on a retrospective analysis of 586 postmenopausal women with a mean age of 60.8 years, who were screened for osteoporosis by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).They were classified into 4 groups with respect to the duration of their breast-feeding as never (group 1), 1-24 months (group 2), 25-60 months (group 3), or > 60 months (group 4). Bone mineral density results for the femur neck and lumbar spine were classified into 3 groups according to WHO criteria as normal (T score > -1.0 SD), osteopenia (T score -1.0 to -2.5 SD), and osteoporosis (T score < -2.5 SD). Patients with osteopenia or osteoporosis (T score < -1.0 SD) were considered as having low bone mass (LBM).

RESULTS

We found a correlation between duration of lactation and femur BMD or spine BMD in the study population (r = 0.116, p < 0.005; r = -0.151, p = 0.001, respectively). Significant differences were found between femur BMD and spine BMD of groups in one-way ANOVA analysis (p = 0.025, p = 0.005, respectively). Additionally, when compared with the other three groups, group 4 was older and had longer duration of menopause (p < 0.01). In logistic regression analysis, age and body mass index were found as independent risk factors of LBM [odds ratio: 1.084 (95% CI 1.031-1.141); odds ratio: 0.896 (95% CI 0.859-0.935)], while duration of lactation was not found as an independent predictor of LBM.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we have found that changes of bone metabolism during lactation had no effect on postmenopausal BMD measured by DXA. Consequently, it can be suggested that long breast-feeding duration is not a risk factor for low bone mass later in life.

Inhibitory effects of iron on bone morphogenetic protein 2-induced osteoblastogenesis

Postmenopausal osteoporosis is characterized by an imbalance of bone resorption exceeding bone formation, resulting in a net loss of bone mineral density (BMD). Estrogen deficiency is known to promote bone resorption. However, the causative factors that impair bone formation have not been identified. Women after menopause experience not only estrogen deficiency but also iron accumulation as a result of cessation of menstruation. In this study we investigated whether increased iron plays a role in osteoporosis. By growing primary mouse osteoclast and osteoblast progenitor cells as well as immortalized cell lines in the presence of iron, we found that increased iron had minimal effects on osteoclast cell differentiation. Interestingly, iron, particularly in its inorganic form, and to a lesser extent ferritin and transferrin all suppressed alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activities in osteoblasts. Moreover, iron downregulated mRNA levels of several other osteoblastogenic markers such as Runx2, osterix, osteopontin, and osteocalcin. To further show that this in vitro finding is relevant to the in vivo condition, we demonstrated that iron-accumulated mice with intact ovaries exhibited a significant decrease in BMD. Although iron inhibited preosteoblast cell differentiation, it did enhance preosteoblast cell proliferation, as evidenced by increased cell growth and expression of cell cycle regulator genes such as CDK4, CDK6, cyclin D1, and cyclin D3 and G(2) /M phase cell population. Taken together, our results suggest that increased iron could be a factor that slows down bone formation in postmenopausal women.

The Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®): applications in clinical practice

Osteoporosis is a serious health concern affecting millions of Americans, with many patients going undiagnosed and untreated. Fractures due to osteoporosis and fracture-related complications are the most clinically relevant and costly consequences of this disorder. The Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®), released by the World Health Organization (WHO) in February 2008, is a major achievement in helping determine which patients may be candidates for pharmacological therapy for osteoporosis. This Web-based algorithm, which has been incorporated into some dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) reporting software, calculates the 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fracture (clinical vertebral, hip, forearm, or humerus) and the 10-year probability of hip fracture in men and women based on easily obtained clinical risk factors and bone mineral density (BMD) of the femoral neck (optional). The National Osteoporosis Foundation updated its U.S. guidelines in February 2008 to incorporate FRAX and recommends that all postmenopausal women and men aged ≥50 years with a hip or vertebral fracture, a T-score ≤-2.5 at the femoral neck or spine (excluding secondary causes), or low bone mass (T-score between -1.0 and -2.5) and a 10-year probability of hip fracture ≥3% or of major osteoporosis-related fracture ≥20% (based on FRAX) should be considered candidates for drug therapy. Despite its demonstrated clinical utility, FRAX has limitations and should not be used in all situations. Acceptance and clinical use of FRAX may help identify men and women at increased risk for osteoporotic fracture, but implementing the tool into clinical practice may be a challenge for busy physicians.

Effects of bazedoxifene on bone mineral density, bone turnover, and safety in postmenopausal Japanese women with osteoporosis

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response late phase 2 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of bazedoxifene in postmenopausal Japanese women 85 years of age or younger with osteoporosis. Eligible subjects received daily treatment with oral doses of bazedoxifene 20 or 40 mg or placebo for 2 years. Efficacy assessments included bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine and other skeletal sites, bone turnover marker levels, lipid parameters, and incidence of new fractures. Of 429 randomized subjects, 387 were evaluable for efficacy, and 423 were included in the safety analyses (mean age, 64 years). At 2 years, the mean percent changes from baseline in lumbar spine BMD were significantly greater with bazedoxifene 20 and 40 mg (2.43% and 2.74%, respectively) than with placebo (-0.65%, p < .001 for both). Both bazedoxifene doses significantly improved BMD at the total hip, femoral neck, and greater trochanter compared with placebo (p < .001 for all). Decreases in bone turnover markers were observed with bazedoxifene 20 and 40 mg as early as 12 weeks (p < .05 for all) and were sustained throughout the study. Total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were significantly decreased from baseline with both bazedoxifene doses compared with placebo (p < .05 for all). Incidences of new vertebral and nonvertebral fractures were similar among the bazedoxifene and placebo groups. Overall, the incidence of adverse events with bazedoxifene 20 and 40 mg was similar to that with placebo. Bazedoxifene significantly improved BMD, reduced bone turnover, and was well tolerated in postmenopausal Japanese women with osteoporosis.

Safety and tolerability of bazedoxifene in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results of a 5-year, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial

Findings from this 5-year phase 3 study of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis showed that bazedoxifene was associated with an overall favorable safety and tolerability profile, with no evidence of endometrial or breast stimulation. Overall, the results at 5 years were consistent with those seen at 3 years.

INTRODUCTION

We report safety and tolerability findings from a 5-year randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study of bazedoxifene in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

METHODS

In the core study, healthy postmenopausal women with osteoporosis (N=7,492; mean age, 66.4 years) were randomized to daily doses of bazedoxifene 20 or 40 mg, raloxifene 60 mg, or placebo for 3 years. During the 2-year study extension, the raloxifene 60-mg treatment arm was discontinued after the 3-year database was finalized, and subjects receiving bazedoxifene 40 mg were transitioned in a blinded manner to bazedoxifene 20 mg (bazedoxifene 40-/20-mg group) after 4 years. Safety and tolerability data are reported for subjects in the bazedoxifene 20- and 40-/20-mg and placebo groups; efficacy findings are reported elsewhere.

RESULTS

A total of 3,146 subjects in the bazedoxifene 20- and 40-mg and placebo groups were enrolled in the extension study (years 4 and 5). Overall, the 5-year incidence of adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and discontinuations due to AEs were similar among groups. The incidence of hot flushes and leg cramps was higher with bazedoxifene compared with placebo. Venous thromboembolic events, primarily deep vein thrombosis, were more frequently reported in the bazedoxifene groups compared with the placebo group. Reports of cardiac disorders and cerebrovascular events were few and evenly distributed among groups. Bazedoxifene showed a neutral effect on the breast and endometrium.

CONCLUSION

Bazedoxifene was associated with an overall favorable safety and tolerability profile in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis over 5 years of therapy, consistent with findings at 3 years.

Efficacy and safety of bazedoxifene in postmenopausal Asian women

This 6-month study examined the efficacy and safety of bazedoxifene 20 mg in postmenopausal Asian women. Bazedoxifene showed statistically significant improvements over placebo in bone mineral density at all skeletal sites evaluated. Bazedoxifene significantly reduced bone turnover and had favorable effects on lipid parameters. Bazedoxifene was safe and well tolerated.

INTRODUCTION

This 6-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study conducted in China, Korea, and Taiwan evaluated the efficacy and safety of bazedoxifene in postmenopausal Asian women.

METHODS

Generally, healthy postmenopausal Asian women (N=487; mean age, 57.2 years; mean lumbar spine bone mineral density [BMD], -1.1) were randomized to daily therapy with bazedoxifene 20 mg or placebo; all subjects received daily supplemental calcium carbonate 600 mg. The changes from baseline in BMD at the lumbar spine (primary end point) and at other skeletal sites, bone turnover markers, and lipid parameters were evaluated at 6 months. Safety assessments included adverse event (AE) reporting and physical/gynecologic examination.

RESULTS

At 6 months, women who received bazedoxifene 20 mg had significantly greater BMD compared with those receiving placebo at the lumbar spine (0.41% vs -0.32%, P<0.01), femoral neck (-0.08% vs -0.69%, P=0.014), trochanter (0.50% vs -0.23%, P=0.010), and total hip (-0.03% vs -0.77%, P<0.001), respectively. Bazedoxifene 20 mg was also associated with significant differences from placebo in median percent reductions from baseline in serum C-telopeptide (-21.8%, P<0.001) and osteocalcin (-12.9%, P<0.001) levels and total (-5.0%, P<0.001) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-9.5%, P<0.001) levels. The incidence of AEs was not different between subjects treated with bazedoxifene and those who received placebo.

CONCLUSION

Bazedoxifene was generally safe and effective in preventing bone loss in this short-term study of postmenopausal Asian women.

Trends related to aging and co-occurring disorders in HIV-infected drug users

Drug users with HIV infection successfully treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy are now living to older ages. As persons with HIV infection age, they become at risk for comorbidities that occur in any group of aging individuals. However, some of these conditions occur at increased rates, with increasing severity, or pose special problems in older persons with HIV infection. This article discusses the epidemiology of HIV infection in aging drug users, and hormonal, cardiovascular, liver, renal, bone, and cognitive disorders and depression and cancer in these individuals, as well as problems related to taking multiple medications and HIV disease progression.

Monitoring pharmacological therapy for osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is a common disease characterized by low bone strength that increases the risk of fractures. The consequences of fractures include increases in morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Randomized clinical trials have shown that pharmacological therapy can reduce the risk of fractures. In clinical practice, however, failure to achieve optimal therapeutic benefit is common for reasons that include taking medication incorrectly, stopping it prematurely, malabsorption, and the presence of unrecognized diseases or conditions with adverse skeletal effects. Monitoring for anti-fracture effectiveness in individual patients is limited by the absence of clinical tools to directly measure bone strength. It is therefore necessary to monitor therapy with biomarkers such as bone mineral density and bone turnover markers. This is a review of the utility of these tools in the care of individual patients.

Osteoporosis therapies: evidence from health-care databases and observational population studies

Osteoporosis is a well-recognized disease with severe consequences if left untreated. Randomized controlled trials are the most rigorous method for determining the efficacy and safety of therapies. Nevertheless, randomized controlled trials underrepresent the real-world patient population and are costly in both time and money. Modern technology has enabled researchers to use information gathered from large health-care or medical-claims databases to assess the practical utilization of available therapies in appropriate patients. Observational database studies lack randomization but, if carefully designed and successfully completed, can provide valuable information that complements results obtained from randomized controlled trials and extends our knowledge to real-world clinical patients. Randomized controlled trials comparing fracture outcomes among osteoporosis therapies are difficult to perform. In this regard, large observational database studies could be useful in identifying clinically important differences among therapeutic options. Database studies can also provide important information with regard to osteoporosis prevalence, health economics, and compliance and persistence with treatment. This article describes the strengths and limitations of both randomized controlled trials and observational database studies, discusses considerations for observational study design, and reviews a wealth of information generated by database studies in the field of osteoporosis.

What is the best balance of benefits and risks among anti-resorptive therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis?

Pharmacologic osteoporosis therapy, particularly anti-resorptives, is recommended in postmenopausal women with clinical risk factors for fracture. Treatment decisions should be made based on the relative benefit-risk profile in different patient populations. Emerging options [e.g., selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) and denosumab] may hold promise for providing protection from bone loss and for fracture risk reduction.Osteoporosis, the most common clinical disorder of bone metabolism, is characterized by low bone mineral density, deterioration of microarchitecture, and a consequent increase in bone fragility and risk of fracture. Pharmacologic therapy is recommended in postmenopausal women with clinical risk factors for fracture and includes anti-resorptive agents such as bisphosphonates, hormone therapy, SERMs, and calcitonin. The anabolic agent teriparatide (parathyroid hormone) is usually reserved for high-risk patients or those with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Strontium ranelate, available outside the USA, has both anti-resorptive and anabolic properties. Supplementation with calcium and vitamin D is recommended for all women aged 50 years and older. Bisphosphonates are often considered first-line therapy for osteoporosis and have the largest base of clinical trial data showing efficacy for global fracture risk reduction. Low-dose hormone therapy is appropriate for younger women who are experiencing other menopausal symptoms. In women for whom bisphosphonates are not appropriate or not tolerated or in younger postmenopausal women who have a low risk for hip fracture, SERMs are a suitable treatment option. Calcitonin is designated for patients who are unable or unwilling to tolerate other osteoporosis agents. Emerging options, including newer SERMs (e.g., bazedoxifene and lasofoxifene) and the monoclonal antibody denosumab, may hold promise for providing protection from bone loss and for fracture risk reduction. Because no single agent is appropriate for all patients, treatment decisions should be made on an individual basis, taking into account the relative benefits and risks in different patient populations.

Algorithm for the management of osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is a common skeletal disease that weakens bones and increases the risk of fractures. It affects about one half of women over the age of 60, and one third of older men. With appropriate care, osteoporosis can be prevented; and when present, it can be easily diagnosed and managed. Unfortunately, many patients with osteoporosis are not recognized or treated, even after sustaining a low-trauma fracture. Even when treatment is initiated, patients may not take medication correctly, regularly, or for a sufficient amount of time to receive the benefit of fracture risk reduction. Efforts to improve compliance and treatment outcomes include longer dosing intervals and parenteral administration. Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis have been developed by the National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) but may not be fully utilized by clinicians who must deal with numerous healthcare priorities. We present an algorithm to help streamline the work of busy clinicians so they can efficiently provide state-of-the-art care to patients with osteoporosis.

Environmental contaminants and human health in the Canadian Arctic

The third Canadian Arctic Human Health Assessment conducted under the Canadian Northern Contaminants Program (NCP), in association with the circumpolar Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP), addresses concerns about possible adverse health effects in individuals exposed to environmental contaminants through a diet containing country foods. The objectives here are to: 1) provide data on changes in human contaminant concentrations and exposure among Canadian Arctic peoples; 2) identify new contaminants of concern; 3) discuss possible health effects; 4) outline risk communication about contaminants in country food; and 5) identify knowledge gaps for future contaminant research and monitoring. The nutritional and cultural benefits of country foods are substantial; however, some dietary studies suggest declines in the amount of country foods being consumed. Significant declines were found for most contaminants in maternal blood over the last 10 years within all three Arctic regions studied. Inuit continue to have the highest levels of almost all persistent organic pollutants (POPs) and metals among the ethnic groups studied. A greater proportion of people in the East exceed Health Canada's guidelines for PCBs and mercury, although the proportion of mothers exceeding these guidelines has decreased since the previous assessment. Further monitoring and research are required to assess trends and health effects of emerging contaminants. Infant development studies have shown possible subtle effects of prenatal exposure to heavy metals and some POPs on immune system function and neurodevelopment. New data suggest important beneficial effects on brain development for Inuit infants from some country food nutrients. The most successful risk communication processes balance the risks and benefits of a diet of country food through input from a variety of regional experts and the community, to incorporate the many socio-cultural and economic factors to arrive at a risk management decision that will be the most beneficial in Arctic communities.

Dose effects of oral estradiol on bone mineral density in Japanese women with osteoporosis

OBJECTIVES

This 2-year study compared 0.5 and 1.0 mg oral estradiol (E(2)), with or without levonorgestrel (LNG), for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in Japanese women.

METHODS

Japanese women with osteoporosis after natural menopause or bilateral oophorectomy were randomized to receive E(2) 0.5 or 1.0 mg/day with LNG 40 microg as required, or placebo, for 52 weeks. Women treated with E(2) in the first year continued therapy at the same doses in the second year. Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics were assessed.

RESULTS

There were 73 women randomized to E(2) 0.5 mg, 157 to E(2) 1.0 mg and 79 to placebo. Lumbar bone mineral density at 52 weeks increased significantly more with E(2) 1.0 mg (p < 0.001) and 0.5 mg (p < 0.001) than with placebo (no change). After 2 years, a 10% increase in bone mineral density with E(2) 1.0 mg was significantly greater than with E(2) 0.5 mg (8%; p = 0.008). E(2) was associated with an acceptable safety and tolerability profile, with slightly more adverse events with E(2) 1.0 than 0.5 mg. Serum E(2) concentration increased in a dose-dependent manner.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that E(2), at both 1.0 mg and 0.5 mg doses, was effective in increasing bone mineral density with an acceptable safety and tolerability profile in Japanese postmenopausal women with osteoporosis but that the bone mineral density response was higher with the 1.0 mg dose.

Bazedoxifene: a novel selective estrogen receptor modulator for postmenopausal osteoporosis

Several new selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) are currently under clinical development for the prevention and/or treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, with the goal of optimizing the estrogen receptor agonist/antagonist activity in target tissues. Bazedoxifene is a novel SERM under clinical investigation for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Emerging clinical data have shown that bazedoxifene is effective in preventing bone loss and osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women, with no evidence of breast or endometrial stimulation. Two large, prospective, international phase 3 studies have been completed. In postmenopausal women at risk for osteoporosis, bazedoxifene has been shown to preserve bone mineral density and to reduce bone turnover. In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, bazedoxifene has demonstrated significant protection against new vertebral fractures and against non-vertebral fractures in women at higher fracture risk. The treatment effects of bazedoxifene were supported by findings from independent re-analyses using the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX), which showed that bazedoxifene significantly reduced the risk of all clinical and morphometric vertebral fracture and of non-vertebral fracture in women at or above a FRAX-based threshold. Bazedoxifene was generally safe and well tolerated in the phase 3 studies and showed neutral effects on the breast and an excellent endometrial safety profile; such attributes allow for the partnering of bazedoxifene with conjugated estrogens for menopausal symptom relief. Collectively, these results suggest that bazedoxifene may be a promising new therapy for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis as a monotherapy or in combination with conjugated estrogens in menopausal hormone therapy.

Bone mineral density results influencing health-related behaviors in male athletes at risk for osteoporosis

The purposes of this study were to determine the role of bone mineral density (BMD) and mood in influencing health-related behaviors of serious leisure male athletes (cyclists and triathletes) at risk for osteoporosis. A cross-sectional design evaluated BMD in 18-60-yr-old serious leisure male cyclists by dual-energy X-ray adsorptiometry (DXA). Activity was measured using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire; personality was assessed using the NEO-60; and quality of life using Short-Form Health 12 (SF-12). Participants completed an online survey questionnaire after completing their DXA testing a minimum of 3 mo before assessing health-related behaviors and general attitudes toward general health and well-being. Forty-two (61.9%) participants responded to the follow-up questionnaire. Serious leisure male athletes are more likely to initiate significant health-related behavioral changes after learning of their bone density results including calcium supplementation and weight-bearing exercise. Men with low BMD (LBMD) had higher openness subscales on NEO-60 compared with men with normal BMD. SF-12 mental and physical health scores were significantly lower in men with LBMD. Perhaps, the interaction and interplay of genetics, activity and behaviors, and aspects of mental and psychological functions contribute to their reduction in BMD and heightened risk for fracture. Findings from this study suggest that early BMD testing in "serious athletes" has important clinical relevance for their potential risk for osteoporosis in the future.

Efficacy and safety of bazedoxifene, a novel selective estrogen receptor modulator for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis

OBJECTIVE

Osteoporosis affects millions of individuals, particularly postmenopausal women, and imposes a severe burden on patients and the healthcare system. Several therapeutic options are commercially available for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis, including bisphosphonates, hormone therapy, and the selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), raloxifene. Because each of these agents has its own individual risk-benefit profile, their use should be tailored to specific patient populations. While many agents are approved for osteoporosis, new therapies are needed that maximize efficacy outcomes and minimize safety concerns. Several new SERMs are being evaluated in an effort to achieve an ideal tissue selectivity profile, with beneficial effects on bone without negative effects on the endometrium and breast. Bazedoxifene is a novel SERM that was recently approved in the European Union and is undergoing regulatory review in the United States for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. This article reviews the clinical efficacy and safety data for bazedoxifene in postmenopausal women with or at risk for osteoporosis.

METHODS

The PubMed database and relevant congress abstract databases were searched to identify all pertinent literature on bazedoxifene for the prevention and/or treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

RESULTS

In phase 3 clinical studies, bazedoxifene has demonstrated significant reduction in the risk of new vertebral fracture versus placebo and positive effects on bone mineral density and bone turnover. Moreover, in a subgroup analysis of women at high risk for fracture, bazedoxifene significantly reduced the risk of nonvertebral fracture versus both placebo and raloxifene. Bazedoxifene was generally safe and well-tolerated in women with and at risk for osteoporosis, with no evidence of endometrial or breast stimulation. Data inclusion for this review article was limited by what was available in the public domain.

CONCLUSION

The available clinical data suggest that bazedoxifene may offer a favorable risk-benefit profile for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Incidence of new fractures in women with osteoporosis-induced vertebral fractures detected on routine lateral chest radiographs

PURPOSE

Vertebral fractures represent one of the major complications of osteopororis. Diagnosis is followed by a pharmacological, interventional or surgical treatment. Up to day there are non practice guidelines for a screening evaluation of bone fractures in elderly and most of the fractures remain undiagnosed. We prospectively evaluated the prevalence of vertebral fractures on chest X-rays to determine the diagnostic and prognostic roles of chest X-ray in predicting new bone fractures 2 years after the initial radiogram.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between March 2004 and October 2005, 4,045 women underwent chest X-ray in our radiology department for any indication. We identified 166 women with the presence of at least one vertebral fracture. A questionnaire was administered to these women to collect information about diagnosis of osteoporosis, history of malignancy, systemic diseases, osteoporosis-inducing drugs and pharmacological, radiological or surgical treatment received.

RESULTS

Out of the 166 women (age 73+/-10.5 years) with vertebral fractures, we interviewed 101 women; 13 had died and 52 were not found. Most of the patients were on menopause (97.1%, 98/101) with an average age of menopause of 48,2 years (+/-6 years). Among the patients on menopause, 15,8% (16/101) had undergone hysterectomy. All patients received a diagnosis of osteoporosis, which was reached with a chest X-ray report in 23.7% (24/101) of cases. A new skeletal fracture occurred in 20.5% (5/27) of patients receiving treatment against a frequency of 20.8% (16/74) in patients without treatment. No statistical difference was found between the groups (p = 0.374).

CONCLUSIONS

Inadequate treatment may explain the lack of a substantial difference in new fracture risk between treated and untreated patients. For these reason we discuss about the evaluation of an adeguate therapeutic approaches in prevention of osteoporosis-induced fractures.

Safety of bazedoxifene in a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled Phase 3 study of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

Background

We report the safety findings from a 3-year phase 3 study (NCT00205777) of bazedoxifene, a novel selective estrogen receptor modulator under development for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Methods

Healthy postmenopausal osteoporotic women (N = 7,492; mean age, 66.4 years) were randomized to daily doses of bazedoxifene 20 or 40 mg, raloxifene 60 mg, or placebo for 3 years. Safety and tolerability were assessed by adverse event (AE) reporting and routine physical, gynecologic, and breast examination.

Results

Overall, the incidence of AEs, serious AEs, and discontinuations due to AEs in the bazedoxifene groups was not different from that seen in the placebo group. The incidence of hot flushes and leg cramps was higher with bazedoxifene or raloxifene compared with placebo. The rates of cardiac disorders and cerebrovascular events were low and evenly distributed among groups. Venous thromboembolic events, primarily deep vein thromboses, were more frequently reported in the active treatment groups compared with the placebo group; rates were similar with bazedoxifene and raloxifene. Bazedoxifene showed a neutral effect on the breast and an excellent endometrial safety profile. The incidence of fibrocystic breast disease was lower with bazedoxifene 20 and 40 mg versus raloxifene or placebo. Reductions in total and low-density lipoprotein levels and increases in high-density lipoprotein levels were seen with bazedoxifene versus placebo; similar results were seen with raloxifene. Triglyceride levels were similar among groups.

Conclusion

Bazedoxifene showed a favorable safety and tolerability profile in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Trial Registration

Trial registration number: NCT00205777; Trial registration date: September 16, 2005

Primary antiphospholipid syndrome in premenopausal women: low vitamin D, high fat mass and maintained bone mineral mass

The aim of this study was to analyze vitamin D levels and their association with bone mineral density and body composition in primary antiphospholipid syndrome. For this cross-sectional study 23 premenopausal women with primary antiphospholipid syndrome (Sapporo criteria) and 23 age- and race-matched healthy controls were enrolled. Demographic, anthropometric, clinical and laboratorial data were collected using clinical interview and chart review. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels, parathormone, calcium and 24-hour urinary calcium were evaluated in all subjects. Bone mineral density and body composition were studied by dual X-ray absorptiometry. The mean age of patients and controls was 33 years. Weight (75.61 [20.73] vs. 63.14 [7.34] kg, p = 0.009), body mass index (29.57 [7.17] vs. 25.35 [3.37] kg, p = 0.014) and caloric ingestion (2493 [1005.6] vs. 1990 [384.1] kcal/day, p = 0.03) were higher in PAPS than controls. All PAPS were under oral anticoagulant with INR within therapeutic range. Interestingly, biochemical bone parameters revealed lower levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D [21.64 (11.26) vs. 28.59 (10.67) mg/dl, p = 0.039], serum calcium [9.04 (0.46) vs. 9.3 (0.46) mg/dl, p = 0.013] and 24-hour urinary calcium [106.55 (83.71) vs. 172.92 (119.05) mg/d, p = 0.027] in patients than in controls. Supporting these findings, parathormone levels were higher in primary antiphospholipid syndrome than in controls [64.82 (37.83) vs. 44.53 (19.62) pg/ml, p = 0.028]. The analysis of osteoporosis risk factors revealed that the two groups were comparable (p > 0.05). Lumbar spine, femoral neck, total femur and whole body bone mineral density were similar in both groups (p > 0.05). Higher fat mass [28.51 (12.93) vs. 20.01 (4.68) kg, p = 0.005] and higher percentage of fat [36.08 (7.37) vs. 31.23 (4.64)%, p = 0.010] were observed in PAPS in comparison with controls; although no difference was seen regarding lean mass. In summary, low vitamin D in primary antiphospholipid syndrome could be secondary to higher weight and fat mass herein observed most likely due to adipocyte sequestration. This weight gain may also justify the maintenance of bone mineral density even with altered biochemical bone parameters.

Effects of resistance training and soy isoflavone on body composition in postmenopausal women

Objective. To investigate the independent and additive effects of resistance training (RT) and soy isoflavone (ISO) on body composition in postmenopausal women (PW). Method. This study used a placebo-controlled, double-blind (soy), randomized (ISO versus placebo) × (RT versus No RT) design. A total of 80 PW, aged 45–70 years, were randomly (71 completed 9-months intervention): RT + ISO (n = 15), No RT + ISO (n = 20), RT + placebo (n = 18), and No RT + placebo (n = 18). ISO received 100 mg a day of isoflavone; and to RT attended supervised resistance training sessions. At baseline and 9-months, fat and muscle mass were estimated by DXA. ANOVA and test t were used. Results. RT groups showed significantly increased muscle strength (35.2%) and muscle mass (1.4%). Exercising attenuated gains in fat trunk and % body fat (P < .05). Significant decreases in muscle mass (−1.8%) and increases in fat mass of the whole-body (1.6%) and trunk (9.7%) was found in no-RT groups (P < .05). In ISO groups, there were no differences in body composition and muscle strength. ISO and RT had no additive effects. Conclusion. In PW: RT improved muscle mass and strength and attenuated gain of fat mass; ISO did not alter body composition and muscle strength; there were no additive effects of RT and ISO.

Management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: 2010 position statement of The North American Menopause Society

OBJECTIVE

To update the evidence-based position statement published by The North American Menopause Society (NAMS) in 2006 regarding the management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

METHODS

NAMS followed the general principles established for evidence-based guidelines to create this updated document. A panel of clinicians and researchers expert in the field of metabolic bone diseases and/or women's health was enlisted to review the 2006 NAMS position statement, compile supporting statements, and reach consensus on recommendations. The panel's recommendations were reviewed and approved by the NAMS Board of Trustees.

RESULTS

Osteoporosis, which is especially prevalent among older postmenopausal women, increases the risk of fractures. Hip and spine fractures are associated with particularly high morbidity and mortality in this population. Given the health implications of osteoporotic fractures, the primary goal of osteoporosis therapy is to prevent fractures, which is accomplished by slowing or stopping bone loss, maintaining bone strength, and minimizing or eliminating factors that may contribute to fractures. The evaluation of postmenopausal women for osteoporosis risk requires a medical history, physical examination, and diagnostic tests. Major risk factors for postmenopausal osteoporosis (as defined by bone mineral density) include advanced age, genetics, lifestyle factors (such as low calcium and vitamin D intake, smoking), thinness, and menopause status. The most common risk factors for osteoporotic fracture are advanced age, low bone mineral density, and previous fracture as an adult. Management focuses first on nonpharmacologic measures, such as a balanced diet, adequate calcium and vitamin D intake, adequate exercise, smoking cessation, avoidance of excessive alcohol intake, and fall prevention. If pharmacologic therapy is indicated, government-approved options are bisphosphonates, selective estrogen-receptor modulators, parathyroid hormone, estrogens, and calcitonin.

CONCLUSIONS

Management strategies for postmenopausal women involve identifying those at risk for fracture, followed by instituting measures that focus on reducing modifiable risk factors through dietary and lifestyle changes and, if indicated, pharmacologic therapy.

Depression and osteoporosis: a research synthesis with meta-analysis

Major depressive disorder has been associated with low bone mineral density. The strength of this association, however, varies greatly among studies; the direction of the causative link is still controversial, and the etiology remains unclear. We aimed to confirm this association, assess its magnitude and estimate its clinical relevancy. A total of 535 articles were initially identified and the research synthesis was based on 33 qualified articles. Of these, 25 articles (or 76%) showed an inverse relationship between major depression or minor depression or depressive symptoms and bone mineral density or bone turnover. Meta-analysis could be performed on 20 of the initially selected 33 articles. Standardized weighted differences in mean AP spine, total femur and femoral neck bone mineral density, each from at least 10 studies, were computed in g/cm (2) and transformed into percent differences. At each site, bone mass was lower in subjects with depression as compared to controls: AP spine bone mineral density was 4.73% lower (95% CI -7.28% to -2.19%, p<0.0001; n=16 studies), total femur bone mineral density was 3.53% lower (95% CI -5.66% to -1.41%, p<0.001; n=13 studies), and femoral neck bone mineral density was 7.32% lower (95% CI -10.67% to -3.96%; p<0.0005; n=8 studies). In conclusion, major depressive disorder was associated with lower bone mineral density at the AP spine, femoral neck, and total femur. The deficits in bone mineral density in subjects with depression are of clinical significance and likely to increase fracture risk over the lifetime of these subjects.

Review of osteoporosis pharmacotherapy for geriatric patients

BACKGROUND

Fractures are a significant problem in geriatric patients, and understanding the evidence for benefit and possible harm of osteoporosis treatments is critical to appropriate management of this patient population.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article was to review the evidence and treatment considerations related to use of the approved osteoporosis treatments in the United States across the continuum of ages in the geriatric population.

METHODS

MEDLINE and the Web of Science were searched to find English-language articles published from 2000 through July 2009. Search terms included: practice guideline, osteoporosis, calcium, vitamin D, pharmacoeconomics, ethnicity, and treatment. The generic names of each of the osteoporosis treatments approved in the United States were searched to find relevant clinical trials and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Pivotal trials that included fracture data or focused specifically on elderly patients (> or = 60 years of age) were selected. Bibliographies in the identified articles were searched for additional articles, and the prescribing information for each of the approved treatments was reviewed.

RESULTS

Many osteoporosis studies have a mean patient age >60 years, but data for older patients are limited. Subanalyses of older patient groups have found risedronate to be beneficial for vertebral fractures in patients aged 70 to 79 years (absolute risk reduction [ARR], 8.4%; P < 0.001) and teriparatide to be beneficial for both vertebral (ARR, 6.4%; P < 0.05) and new nonvertebral fragility fractures (ARR, 9.9%; P < 0.05) in women aged > or = 75 years. However, no RCTs of geriatric patients who were either nonambulatory or had multiple comorbidities were identified in the literature.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence indicates that the osteoporosis treatments currently available in the United States are beneficial for treating osteoporosis in geriatric patients. However, data are limited for the oldest patients (> or = 80 years) and those with significant comorbidities. Because of the limited availability of data for geriatric patients with significant comorbidities, the properties of the various agents, including efficacy, tolerability, and potential contraindications, should be considered carefully for each geriatric patient.

Association between circulating osteoprogenitor cell numbers and bone mineral density in postmenopausal osteoporosis

The role of circulating osteoprogenitor cells in postmenopausal osteoporosis is unknown. We found that alkaline-phosphatase-positive (AP+) cells are the lacking cells in osteoporosis, whose reduction is related to bone loss. Conversely, the increased number of alkaline phosphatase/CD34-positive cells may reflect the reactive bone marrow contribution to bone formation.

INTRODUCTION

Circulating osteoprogenitor cells mineralize in vitro and in vivo. Loss of osteogenic cells may account for bone loss in osteoporosis. We studied whether there is an association between the number of circulating osteoprogenitor cells and bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women with and without osteoporosis.

METHODS

The number of circulating AP+, osteocalcin-positive (OCN+), AP+/CD34+, and OCN+/CD34+ cells was quantified in 54 postmenopausal osteoporotic women and 36 age-matched nonosteoporotic controls.

RESULTS

The number of AP+ cells was lower in osteoporotic women than in controls (127 +/- 16 vs 234 +/- 23 per microliter; p < 0.001); higher levels of AP+/CD34+, OCN+, and OCN+/CD34+ cells were found in osteoporotic than controls (p < 0.01 for all). The number of AP+ cells was correlated with lumbar BMD (rho = 0.29; p = 0.008) and proximal femur BMD (rho = 0.31; p = 0.005) whereas inverse correlations were found between AP+/CD34+ cells, OCN+, OCN+/CD34+, and BMD. Reduced AP+ cells and increased AP+/CD34 +, OCN+, and OCN+/CD34+ cells were predictors of low BMD, independent of traditional risk factors for osteoporosis.

CONCLUSION

In postmenopausal osteoporotic women, a reduced number of circulating AP+ cells and increased levels of AP+/CD34+, OCN+, and OCN+/CD34+ cells are associated with reduced bone mineral density, the interpretation of such a cellular imbalance needing exploration.

Association among menopause, hormone replacement therapy, and periodontal attachment loss in southern Brazilian women

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the association among menopause, hormone replacement therapy (HRT), and periodontal attachment loss (PAL).

METHODS

Three hundred twenty-eight women (40 to 69 years old) who participated in a previous oral survey in South Brazil were included. Women who reported not having their monthly menstrual cycles for >or=12 months were classified as postmenopausal. Postmenopausal women were categorized according to HRT. Women with >or=30% teeth with PAL >or=5 mm were classified as having periodontitis. The data were analyzed using a multivariable logistic regression model and adjusted for age, smoking, socioeconomic status, and dental care.

RESULTS

The prevalence of periodontitis was significantly greater among postmenopausal women not using HRT (HRT-) than among premenopausal women (64.4% versus 46.3%; P = 0.005). Similarly, the multivariable analysis demonstrated a significantly higher chance of having periodontitis in postmenopausal HRT- women than in premenopausal women (odds ratio [OR], 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1 to 4.0). In contrast, no significant differences were observed in the prevalence of periodontitis between postmenopausal women using HRT (HRT+) and premenopausal women (48.8% versus 46.3%; P = 0.77). After adjusting for cofactors, postmenopausal HRT+ women did not have a greater likelihood of having periodontitis than premenopausal women (OR, 1.2; 95% CI: 0.6 to 2.5). No significant differences in tooth loss were observed among the study groups after adjusting for confounders.

CONCLUSIONS

Postmenopausal HRT- women had a greater chance of having periodontitis than premenopausal women. In contrast, postmenopausal HRT+ women and premenopausal women had similar periodontal status. HRT may have a beneficial effect on periodontal health.

Undertreatment of menopausal symptoms and novel options for comprehensive management

OBJECTIVE

There is currently a gap in treatment options for menopausal symptoms and a need for comprehensive therapies that are safe and effective for postmenopausal women. This review discusses challenges in the management of menopausal symptoms and the effect of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) study findings on current treatment patterns. It also examines present and future therapies.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A literature search was conducted using Medline, the Cochrane Database, and the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute WHI website with the following search terms: primary care, menopause, vasomotor symptoms, hormone therapy, osteoporosis, and vaginal atrophy. Searches were limited to articles published between 1995 and 2009.

RESULTS

Comprehensive therapies that target several aspects of menopause, such as vasomotor symptoms and chronic disease prevention, are currently hormone based. These hormone-based approaches are considered more effective than currently available nonhormonal therapies for the relief of menopausal symptoms. However, hormone therapy is not recommended for women at high risk for venous thromboembolic events, cardiovascular disease, and/or breast cancer. A need exists for novel therapies that mitigate menopausal symptoms, provide protection from osteoporosis, and encourage patient compliance without promoting cancer, heart disease, or stroke. Emerging modalities and strategies, such as the tissue selective estrogen complex (TSEC), Org 50081, MF101, and desvenlafaxine, may provide improved options for postmenopausal women.

CONCLUSIONS

Several new menopausal therapies that may help to address the ongoing unmet need for safe and effective therapies for postmenopausal women are currently in development. In particular, the TSEC, which provides the benefits of both a selective estrogen receptor modulator and conjugated estrogens with an improved tolerability profile, may offer advantages over currently available treatment options. Limitations of this review include the narrow search criteria and limited search period.

Evaluation of compliance with osteoporosis treatment guidelines after initiation of a pharmacist-run osteoporosis service at a family medicine clinic

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis affects more than 10 million Americans, and fracture complications are devastating to patients and society. Despite the availability of guidelines and performance measures, osteoporosis is not optimally managed. Pharmacists have been pivotal in management of other disease states, and a multidisciplinary approach to osteoporosis management may improve patient outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To establish a pharmacist-run osteoporosis service at a family medicine clinic and to evaluate short-term compliance with osteoporosis treatment guidelines before and after initiation of the service.

METHODS

A pharmacist-run osteoporosis service was established in October 2008. Adults with the diagnosis of osteoporosis before initiation of the service were included in evaluation of short-term compliance with treatment guidelines, including appropriate dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan frequency, pharmacotherapy, calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and nonpharmacologic education. Of 42 referred patients, 22 were eligible for inclusion. A retrospective chart review was conducted, and patients served as their own controls, with data from before and after establishment of the service evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 22 patients evaluated, 8 (36%) received DEXA scans at the appropriate frequency before the service was established, versus 18 (82%) after the service was initiated. Seven (32%) patients were taking appropriate pharmacotherapy before the service, versus 17 (77%) after the service. Nine (41%) patients were taking calcium and vitamin D before the service, versus 22 (100%) after the service. Three (33%) of these patients were taking the appropriate dose and salt of calcium before the service, versus 20 (91%) after the service. Five (56%) of the 9 patients were taking the appropriate vitamin D dose before the service, versus 21 (95%) after the service. No patient had documented nonpharmacologic education prior to the service, compared with all patients after the service. All differences were significant (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

A pharmacist-run osteoporosis service significantly improved short-term compliance with guidelines, including appropriate DEXA scan frequency, pharmacotherapy, calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and nonpharmacologic education.

Depression as a risk factor for osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is a major public health threat. Multiple studies have reported an association between depression and low bone mineral density, but a causal link between these two conditions is disputed. Here we review the endocrine and immune alterations secondary to depression that might affect bone mass. We also discuss the possible role of poor lifestyle in the etiology of osteoporosis in subjects with depression and the potential effect of antidepressants on bone loss. We propose that depression induces bone loss and osteoporotic fractures, primarily via specific immune and endocrine mechanisms, while poor lifestyle habits and use of specific antidepressants are potential contributory factors.

Sex steroid and tropic hormone levels may be associated with postoperative prognosis of vitrectomy in Korean postmenopausal women: a pilot study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the postoperative prognostic value of sex hormones and related biochemical markers for vitrectomy in postmenopausal Korean women.

METHODS

Twenty-three postmenopausal women undergoing vitrectomy who had not received hormone therapy were recruited. Before vitrectomy, hormonal profile such as follicle-stimulating hormone, estradiol, testosterone, tumor markers, and biochemical markers including homocysteine, glycosylated hemoglobin, protein, albumin, and lipid panel was measured. These parameters were correlated with ophthalmologic outcomes such as intraocular pressure, preoperative and postoperative visual acuity, and the visual improvement after surgery.

RESULTS

Follicle-stimulating hormone showed a positive correlation with the logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution value of postoperative visual acuity (Pearson's correlation, 0.583; P = 0.009). This significance was maintained after age or preoperative visual acuity was adjusted (P = 0.006 and P = 0.013, respectively). Testosterone also showed a positive correlation with intraocular pressure before and after adjustment for age (P = 0.027 and P = 0.033, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Sex steroid and tropic hormones may be associated with postoperative ophthalmologic outcomes in the postmenopausal women undergoing vitrectomy. Further larger scale studies will be necessary to confirm these preliminary results.

Osteoporosis guidelines

The Position Statement from the International Menopause Society (IMS) in 2004 recommends the use of hormone therapy for the 'avoidance of bone-wasting and fractures'. It also states that 'prevention, not treatment, is the most feasible goal'. In updating the Statement, this paper considers the relevance of Osteoporosis Guidelines. Relevant documents will be of two broad types. These may be consensus statements/position statements that summarize the 'state of the art' for practitioners, based on the work of expert groups, or they may be formal Guidelines generated through formal 'evidence-based' methodology. The former approach is generally used by Societies and can be generated through relatively efficient consensus processes. The latter approach will normally involve extensive work and cost, necessarily becomes very detailed, involving systematic review and technology appraisal and can lead to highly specific recommendations on intervention thresholds. For the revision of the general IMS Position Statement, the specific IMS Paper on Postmenopausal Osteoporosis (2005) must be a key reference document. This provides a description of the international consensus on the management of osteoporosis up to late 2004 and which remains relevant today. Additionally, other consensus statements and systematic guidelines need to be considered. Across these documents providing guidance, the substantial influence of the International Osteoporosis Foundation/National Osteoporosis Foundation Position Paper, defining a 'New approach to the development of assessment guidelines for osteoporosis', can be seen. This flagged the importance of a shift from guidance, tying the diagnostic threshold to the intervention threshold, and instead advised linking the intervention threshold to estimated fracture risk probability. This moves the intervention decision away from a simple bone density threshold to a more complex, but more realistic, threshold estimate, taking into account a range of important clinical risk factors and bone mineral density. This thinking is reflected in the IMS Paper on Postmenopausal Osteoporosis (2005).

Bone mineral density measurement at both spine and hip for diagnosing osteoporosis in Japanese patients

In Japan, spinal dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) has been commonly performed for diagnosing osteoporosis but scanning the proximal femur is not done widely. The latest Japanese guidelines for prevention and treatment of osteoporosis, revised in 2006, recommend bone mineral density (BMD) measurement at both spine and hip for diagnosing osteoporosis, although there have been no reports that proved the necessity of those measurements. One thousand forty-one women and 485 men with clinical suspicion of osteoporosis were enrolled in this study, and DXA was performed at both spine and hip. The proportions of the patients who had inconsistency between diagnosis of osteoporosis from spinal DXA and that of hip were estimated. As a result, 22% of women and 15% of men had an inconsistency with the diagnosis of osteoporosis using DXA at each measurement site. There was inconsistency in diagnosing osteoporosis using DXA at the spine and proximal femur measurement sites. Because spine and femoral DXA measurements complement each other in the diagnosis of osteoporosis, BMD measurement at both spine and hip should be performed for all Japanese patients who are suspected osteoporosis, regardless of age and sex.

Vitamin D insufficiency does not affect response of bone mineral density to alendronate

SUMMARY

We investigated whether osteoporosis therapy with alendronate in postmenopausal patients is equally effective in patients who are vitamin D insufficient as in those who are vitamin D sufficient. We found that vitamin D insufficiency is common among patients with low bone density but that vitamin D insufficiency did not impair response to alendronate.

INTRODUCTION

Treatment of vitamin D deficiency leads to significant improvements in bone mineral density (BMD); however, whether insufficiency affects BMD's response to bisphosphonate therapy is unknown.

METHODS

To determine whether vitamin D insufficiency at initiation of alendronate therapy for low BMD affects treatment efficacy, we used data from 1,000 postmenopausal women randomly selected from the vertebral fracture arm (n = 2,027) of the placebo-controlled Fracture Intervention Trial of alendronate. Participants were randomly assigned to placebo (50%) or alendronate therapy and most (83%) to calcium (500 mg/day) and cholecalciferol (250 IU/day). We measured serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25OHD) at enrollment, then categorized baseline vitamin D status according to 25OHD concentration (<or= 10 ng/ml = deficient; >10 but <or= 30 ng/ml = insufficient; >30 ng/ml = sufficient) and used linear regression to compare the effects of alendronate treatment among these categories.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

At baseline, participants were vitamin D sufficient (14%), insufficient (83%), and deficient (2%). We found that BMD response to therapy at total hip or spine did not vary by vitamin D status at baseline (p for heterogeneity = 0.6). We determined that vitamin D insufficiency is common among participants with low BMD. However, vitamin D status at initiation of therapy does not affect BMD's response to alendronate, when it is coadministered with cholecalciferol and calcium.