A novel pathway of antigen presentation by dendritic and endothelial cells: Implications for allorecognition and infectious diseases

CTLA-4 on alloreactive CD4 T cells interacts with recipient CD80/86 to promote tolerance

Although the inhibitory receptor CTLA-4 (CD152) has been implicated in peripheral CD4 T-cell tolerance, its mechanism of action remains poorly defined. We analyzed mechanisms of CD4 cell tolerance in a model of tolerance induction involving establishment of mixed hematopoietic chimerism in recipients of fully MHC-mismatched allogeneic bone marrow cells with anti-CD154 mAb. Animals lacking CD80 and CD86 failed to achieve chimerism. We detected no T cell-intrinsic requirement for CD28 for chimerism induction. However, a CD4 T cell-intrinsic signal through CTLA-4 was shown to be essential within the first 48 hours of exposure to alloantigen for the establishment of tolerance and mixed chimerism. This signal must be provided by a recipient CD80/86(+) non-T-cell population. Donor CD80/86 expression was insufficient to achieve tolerance. Together, our findings demonstrate a surprising role for interactions of CTLA-4 expressed by alloreactive peripheral CD4 T cells with CD80/86 on recipient antigen-presenting cells (APCs) in the induction of early tolerance, suggesting a 3-cell tolerance model involving directly alloreactive CD4 cells, donor antigen-expressing bone marrow cells, and recipient antigen-presenting cells. This tolerance is independent of regulatory T cells and culminates in the deletion of directly alloreactive CD4 T cells.

Alloreactive CD8 T cell tolerance requires recipient B cells, dendritic cells, and MHC class II

Allogeneic bone marrow chimerism induces robust systemic tolerance to donor alloantigens. Achievement of chimerism requires avoidance of marrow rejection by pre-existing CD4 and CD8 T cells, either of which can reject fully MHC-mismatched marrow. Both barriers are overcome with a minimal regimen involving anti-CD154 and low dose (3 Gy) total body irradiation, allowing achievement of mixed chimerism and tolerance in mice. CD4 cells are required to prevent marrow rejection by CD8 cells via a novel pathway, wherein recipient CD4 cells interacting with recipient class II MHC tolerize directly alloreactive CD8 cells. We demonstrate a critical role for recipient MHC class II, B cells, and dendritic cells in a pathway culminating in deletional tolerance of peripheral alloreactive CD8 cells.

Membrane nanotubes: dynamic long-distance connections between animal cells

Membrane nanotubes are transient long-distance connections between cells that can facilitate intercellular communication (for example, by trafficking vesicles or transmitting calcium-mediated signals), but they can also contribute to pathologies (for example, by directing the spread of viruses). Recent data have revealed considerable heterogeneity in their structures, processes of formation and functional properties, in part dependent on the cell types involved. Despite recent progress in this young research field, further research is sorely needed.

Dendritic cells, the liver, and transplantation

Interstitial liver dendritic cells (DCs) exhibit phenotypic diversity and functional plasticity. They play important roles in both innate and adaptive immunity. Their comparatively low inherent T cell stimulatory ability and the outcome of their interactions with CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells, as well as with natural killer (NK) T cells and NK cells within the liver, may contribute to regulation of hepatic inflammatory responses and liver allograft outcome. Liver DCs migrate in the steady state and after liver transplantation to secondary lymphoid tissues, where the outcome of their interaction with antigen-specific T cells determines the balance between tolerance and immunity. Systemic and local environmental factors that are modulated by ischemia-reperfusion injury, liver regeneration, microbial infection, and malignancy influence hepatic DC migration, maturation, and function. Current research in DC biology is providing new insights into the role of these important antigen-presenting cells in the complex events that affect liver transplant outcome.

Allorecognition and the alloresponse: clinical implications

The artificial transfer of tissues or cells between genetically diverse individuals elicits an immune response that is adaptive and specific. This response is orchestrated by T lymphocytes that are recognizing, amongst others, major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules expressed on the surface of the transferred cells. Three pathways of recognition are described: direct, indirect and semi-direct. The sets of antigens that are recognized in this setting are also discussed, namely, MHC protein products, the MHC class I-related chain (MIC) system, minor histocompatibility antigens and natural killer cell receptor ligands. The end product of the effector responses are hyperacute, acute and chronic rejection. Special circumstances surround the situation of pregnancy and bone marrow transplantation because in the latter, the transferred cells are the ones originating the immune response, not the host. As the understanding of these processes improves, the ability to generate clinically viable immunotherapies will increase.

Intercellular transfer of cell-surface proteins is common and can affect many stages of an immune response

Cells can extend the limits of their transcriptome by using proteins captured from other cells. Through an exchange of specific proteins, tools and information can be shared to establish integrated communities of cells that are better able to coordinate stages of an immune response. Transferred proteins can also contribute to pathology by allowing, for example, infection of cell types not otherwise infected. Here, I present the case for considering the intercellular transfer of cell-surface proteins between immune cells as commonplace and important.