Functional Deficits After Intraneural Injection During Interscalene Block:

Ultrasound brachial plexus anesthesia and analgesia for upper extremity surgery: essentials of our current understanding, 2011

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Ultrasound-guidance is gaining tremendous popularity. There is growing evidence of value with emphasis on clinical relevance, but can ultrasound-guidance scientifically warrant changing the practice of upper extremity regional? The literature is searched to describe findings where ultrasound may reduce complication rates, reduce block performance times, and improve block efficacy and quality.

RECENT FINDINGS

Ultrasound examination identified variations in anatomical positioning of C5-C7 roots in approximately half of all patients despite no deleterious effects on block efficacy. Anesthetic volumes in brachial plexus blockade may be reduced without compromise of effectiveness. However, even with reduced volumes injected into the interscalene space, respiratory compromise from effect(s) on the phrenic nerve may result in hemi-diaphragmatic paresis. Ultrasound-guidance may reduce discomfort during axillary block placement compared with neurostimulation or parasthesia. Nerve catheters may be highly effective and provide prolonged analgesia compared with single-shot injections. Infraclavicular catheters result in improved analgesia compared with supraclavicular catheters and multiple injections of local provide no advantage over single-shot infraclavicular blockade. Dexamethasone combined with local may extend analgesia following a single-injection interscalene or supraclavicular block. During interscalene blockade, intraepineurial injections may occur, but incidence of nerve injury remains low. Therefore, debate continues about intraepineurial injections.

SUMMARY

Intraepineurial injection requires additional investigation. Conclusions have suggested reducing typical volumes (40  ml) of local with ultrasound-directed upper extremity blockade. Increased use of perineural catheters is being advocated for prolonged analgesia, but risk-to-benefit consequences need to always be considered.

Is there still a place for the use of nerve stimulation?

The introduction of nerve stimulation as a method of nerve localization sparked a new beginning in regional anesthesia. It was an epochal development akin to the utilization of ultrasound in more recent times. Many experts now consider ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blockade to be more efficient, less painful, and more successful than landmark and nerve stimulation techniques. However, inadvertent intraneural injection continues to occur despite the widespread use of ultrasound and nerve stimulation. Both of these technologies allow for only limited elucidation of needle position relative to the target nerve and are unable to reliably identify intraneural position of the needle. This article will review the role of nerve stimulation in modern regional anesthesia techniques in light of the introduction of ultrasound technology.

Spread of local anesthetic during an ultrasound-guided interscalene block: does the injection site influence diffusion?

BACKGROUND

During interscalene block (ISB) placement, ultrasound guidance (USG) enables the practitioner to measure the spread of local anesthetic around the nerve trunks or roots, and to adjust the needle position in order to optimize diffusion. Moreover, USG helps determine the best injection level, i.e. the point from which diffusion gives the most complete brachial plexus block. The aim of this study was to compare C5 and C6 level injections and to determine which level allows the best diffusion.

METHODS

Sixty randomized patients scheduled for shoulder surgery were divided into two groups. In group C5, injection was directed toward C5 while in group C6, the C6 nerve root was targeted. Block performance time was recorded. The onset of motor and sensory block of each nerve distribution was evaluated every 10 min over a 30-min period.

RESULTS

The average time taken to perform a nerve block was 6.2+2.6 min in Group C6 and 6.0+2.1 min in Group C5 (NS). At 30 min, the number of patients with a satisfactory musculocutaneous and axillary nerve block was not notably greater in either group. By contrast, a significantly higher success rate was observed for other nerves in the C6 group as compared to the C5 group: ulnar nerve block: 93% vs. 19%, radial nerve block: 96% vs. 28%, median nerve block: 96%, vs. 69%.

CONCLUSIONS

During USG ISB placement, injection below the C6 level provided the same efficiency in analgesia after shoulder surgery as an injection cranial to the C5 nerve root but a greater success rate of anesthesia in all distal nerve areas. This technique could be very interesting for trauma cases as an alternative to a supraclavicular block and offers a high success rate and is simple to perform, potentially promoting wide use and quicker learning for beginners.