Prevention of Infection After Gynecologic Procedures: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 195

Assessment of risk and economic burden of surgical site infection (SSI) posthysterectomy using a U.S. longitudinal database

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infection posthysterectomy has significant impact on patient morbidity, mortality, and health care costs. This study evaluates incidence, risk factors, and total payer costs of surgical site infection after hysterectomy in commercial, Medicare, and Medicaid populations using a nationwide claims database.

METHODS

IBM MarketScan databases identified women having hysterectomy between 2014 and 2018. Deep-incisional/organ space (DI/OS) and superficial infections were identified over 6 months postoperatively with risk factors and direct infection-associated payments by insurance type over a 24-month postoperative period.

RESULTS

Analysis identified 141,869 women; 7.8% Medicaid, 5.8% Medicare, and 3.9% commercially insured women developed deep-incisional/organ space surgical site infection, whereas 3.9% Medicaid, 3.2% Medicare, and 2.1% commercially insured women developed superficial infection within 6 months of index procedure. Deep-incisional/organ space risk factors were open approach (hazard ratio, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-1.8) and payer type (Medicaid versus commercial [hazard ratio, 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-1.5]); superficial risk factors were payer type (Medicaid versus commercial [hazard ratio, 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-1.6]) and solid tumor without metastasis (hazard ratio, 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-1.6). Highest payments occurred with Medicare ($44,436, 95% confidence interval: $33,967-$56,422) followed by commercial ($27,140, 95% confidence interval: $25,990-$28,317) and Medicaid patients ($17,265, 95% confidence interval: $15,247-$19,426) for deep-incisional/organ space infection at 24-month posthysterectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Real-world cost of managing superficial, deep-incisional/organ space infection after hysterectomy was significantly higher than previously reported. Surgical approach, payer type, and comorbid risk factors contributed to increased risk of infection and economic burden. Medicaid patients experienced the highest risk of infection, followed by Medicare patients. The study suggests adoption of a robust evidence-based surgical care bundle to mitigate risk of surgical site infection and economic burden is warranted.

Chlorhexidine gluconate vs povidone-iodine vaginal antisepsis for urogynecologic surgery: a randomized controlled noninferiority trial

BACKGROUND

Although povidone-iodine (iodine) is the only Food and Drug Administration-approved vaginal antiseptic solution, there is a lack of comparative data evaluating alternatives. Chlorhexidine gluconate is readily accessible, recommended by multiple societies as an alternative for patients with iodine allergy, and preliminary data indicate that it may provide superior antisepsis.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of chlorhexidine and iodine as presurgical vaginal antiseptic solutions in preventing the most common surgery-associated infection after gynecologic surgery, urinary tract infections.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a randomized controlled noninferiority trial among women undergoing urogynecologic surgery. The primary outcome measure was symptomatic urinary tract infection within 2 weeks after surgery. The secondary outcomes included culture-proven urinary tract infection at 2 and 6 weeks after surgery, symptomatic urinary tract infections at 6 weeks after surgery, any surgical site infection at 2 weeks after surgery, and patient-reported vaginal irritation after surgery. We required 58 participants per arm to demonstrate noninferiority of chlorhexidine vs iodine (margin of relative risk of <1.5 for the upper limit of 95% confidence interval) between groups for the primary outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 119 participants (61 in the chlorhexidine group and 58 in the iodine group) completed the primary outcome and were included in the analyses. There was no difference in the groups' demographic characteristics, medical history, operations performed, or perioperative factors. Chlorhexidine was not inferior to iodine concerning the primary outcome, symptomatic urinary tract infection at 2 weeks after surgery (10% vs 17%; relative risk, 0.6; 95% confidence interval [-∞, 1.3]). Furthermore, chlorhexidine was not inferior to iodine for the secondary urinary tract infection outcomes (culture-proven urinary tract infection at 2 and 6 weeks after surgery and symptomatic urinary tract infection at 6 weeks after surgery). Groups were similar in terms of surgical site infection (overall 3/119 [2.5%]) and presence of any vaginal irritation (4/54 [7.4%], for both groups).

CONCLUSION

Chlorhexidine was not inferior to iodine for vaginal antisepsis before urogynecologic surgery concerning urinary tract infection. Given the similar postoperative urinary tract infection rates demonstrated in this study and the lack of difference in vaginal irritation, chlorhexidine seemed to be a safe and reasonable option for vaginal antisepsis before surgical procedures. Additional studies are needed to further examine surgical site infection.

:

Background

We aimed to determine the prevalence and risk factors of surgical site infection (SSI) after cesarean delivery (CD) in a rural area in China.

Methods

We identified 155 patients with incisional and organ/space SSIs by International Classification of Disease codes and matched them with 465 patients (controls) in a time-matched retrospective quality assurance analysis. Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the risk factors for SSI: the work-years of providers, the number of antenatal care (ANC) visits, CD after labor, positive discharge culture, postoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and fever.

Results

and discussion: During the study, 155 women with SSI were identified among the 8640 patients who delivered by CD. The incidence of SSIs was 179 per 10 000patients (95%CI: 151–207 per 10 000 patients). The total duration of hospitalization in patients with SSI was 14.49 ± 8.68 days compared with 7.96 ± 2.35 days in patients with no SSI (P < 0.01). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that the work-years of providers (odds ratio [OR] = 3.729, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.463–9.501, p = 0.006), irregular ANC visits (OR = 3.245, 95% CI: 1.264–8.329, p = 0.028), CD after labor (OR = 2.545, 95% CI: 0.935–6.926, p = 0.020), postoperative CRP level (OR = 2.545, 95% CI: 0.935–6.926, p = 0.016) and a positive discharge culture (OR = 2.954, 95% CI: 0.305–28.643, p = 0.019) were positively associated with SSI. However, the rates of maternal request (OR = 0.186, 95% CI: 0.065–0.535, p = 0.002) and postoperative fever (OR = 0.208, 95% CI: 0.087–0.494, p = 0.001) were negatively related to SSI.

Conclusions

Special attentions should be paid to CD patients who had irregular ANC visits, attempted labor, a positive discharge culture, higher CRP levels and fever after surgery, who had a greater risk of SSI.

•

The incidence of SSIs was 179 per 10 000 patients (95%CI: 151–207).

•

Risk factors of SSIs included: irregular ANC visits, a positive discharge culture.

•

Higher CRP levels and fever after surgery had a greater risk of SSI.

Seksaka M, F. Balata G. Antibiotic overuse in obstetric and gynecologic procedures at Zagazig university hospitals: A prospective observational study

Surgical site infection (SSI) constitutes a major problem in healthcare in terms of healthcare cost, morbidity and mortality. Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) is one of the effective strategies for SSI prevention. Poor adherence to SAP guidelines across different countries has been observed. Misuse of prophylactic antibiotics threatens patient safety and leads to an increase in the acquisition of antibiotic resistance. The aim of this study was to assess the utilization of SAP in obstetric and gynecologic procedures in terms of indication for prophylaxis, antibiotic selection, timing of administration and prophylaxis duration. A prospective observational study was conducted at the obstetrics and gynecology department of Zagazig University Hospital during the period from January 2020 to June 2020. Medical records of 264 women were recorded and evaluated. The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) therapeutic guidelines, World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations and The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) practice bulletin were used for data evaluation and hence women were stratified into two groups. For women who underwent procedures in which guidelines recommended the use of SAP (200 patients; 75.75%), 198 women (99%) received preoperative prophylaxis. None of women (0%) received the recommended first line antibiotic by guidelines while the most commonly used prophylactic antibiotics were Cefotaxime (86 patients; 43.43%) and Ampicillin-sulbactam (62 patients; 31.31%). Preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis timing was 0-60 minutes before skin incision. All women received postoperative prophylaxis that extended to an average of 7 days. Regarding the other group who underwent procedures in which prophylactic antibiotics weren’t recommended by guidelines (64 patients; 24.24%), 37 women (57.81%) followed the guidelines and didn’t receive SAP while 27 women (42.18%) received SAP. Poor adherence to guidelines recommendations regarding prophylactic antibiotic selection and prophylaxis duration was observed. High utilization rate of prophylactic antibiotics in procedures that didn’t require their use was reported..

Vaginal preparation with povidone-iodine or chlorhexidine before hysterectomy: a propensity score matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Antiseptic vaginal preparation is recommended before gynecologic surgery; however, there is a lack of data regarding the effectiveness of different agents.

OBJECTIVE

To compare rates of postoperative infectious complications and hospital utilization with preoperative vaginal preparation using povidone-iodine or chlorhexidine before hysterectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent hysterectomy for gynecologic indications at 70 hospitals in a statewide surgical collaborative between January 2017 and December 2019. The primary outcome was postoperative infectious complications (including urinary tract infection, surgical site infections involving superficial, deep, or organ space tissues, or cellulitis) within 30 days of surgery. To adjust for confounding, propensity score matching, 1:1 without replacement and with a caliper of.005 was performed to create cohorts that had vaginal preparation with either povidone-iodine or chlorhexidine and did not differ in observable characteristics. We compared the rates of infectious morbidity and hospital utilization (emergency department visits, readmission, reoperation) in the matched cohorts.

RESULTS

In the statewide collaborative, there were 18,184 patients who received povidone-iodine and 3018 who received chlorhexidine. After propensity score matching of 2935 pairs, the povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine groups did not differ in demographics, comorbidities, choice of preoperative antibiotics, benign vs malignant surgical indication, and surgical approach. Povidone-iodine was associated with a lower rate of infectious morbidity (3.0% vs 4.3%; P=.01), urinary tract infection (1.1% vs 1.7%; P=.03) and emergency department visits (7.9% vs 9.7%; P=.01) than with chlorhexidine. There were nonsignificant trends of lower rates of surgical site infection (2.0% vs 2.7%; P=.07) and reoperation (1.6% vs 2.1%; P=.18).

CONCLUSION

This propensity score matched analysis provides evidence that povidone-iodine is preferable to chlorhexidine for vaginal preparation before hysterectomy because of lower rates of infectious morbidity and fewer emergency department visits. However, the absolute differences in infectious morbidity rates were approximately 1%, and in the event of an iodine allergy, chlorhexidine appears to be a reasonable alternative.

Surgical site infections in gynecology: the latest evidence for prevention and management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Surgical site infection (SSI) remains one of the most common postoperative surgical complications. Prevention and appropriate treatment remain paramount.

RECENT FINDINGS

Evidence-based recommendations include recognition and reduction of preoperative risks including hyperglycemia and smoking, treatment of preexisting infections, skin preparation with chlorhexidine gluconate, proper use of preoperative antibiotics, and implementation of prevention bundles. Consideration should be given to the use of dual antibiotic preoperative treatment with cephazolin and metronidazole for all hysterectomies.

SUMMARY

Despite advancements, SSI in gynecologic surgery remains a major cause of perioperative morbidity and healthcare cost. Modifiable risk factors should be evaluated and patients optimized to the best extent possible prior to surgery. Preoperative risks include obesity, hyperglycemia, smoking, and untreated preexisting infections. Intraoperative risk-reducing strategies include appropriate perioperative antibiotics, correct topical preparation, maintaining normothermia, and minimizing blood loss. Additionally, early recognition and prompt treatment of SSI remain crucial.

The risk factors and care measures of surgical site infection after cesarean section in China: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infections after cesarean section are very common clinically, it is necessary to evaluate the risk factors of surgical site infections after cesarean section, to provide evidences for the treatment and nursing care of cesarean section.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective cohort study design. Patients undergone cesarean section in a tertiary hospital of China from May 2017 to May 2020 were identified, we collected the clinical data of the included patients, and we analyzed the infection rate, etiological characteristics and related risk factors of surgical site infection after caesarean section.

RESULTS

A total of 206 patients with cesarean section were included, and the incidence of surgical site infection in patients with cesarean section was 23.30%. A total of 62 cases of pathogens were identified, Enterococcus faecalis (33.87%) and Escherichia coli (29.03%) were the most common pathogens. Both Enterococcus faecalis and Escherichia coli were highly sensitive to Cefoperazone, Meropenem, and Levofloxacin. Logistic regression analyses indicated that Age ≥ 30y (OR 4.18, 95%CI: 1.23-7.09), BMI ≥ 24 (OR 2.39, 95%CI: 1.02-4.55), duration of cesarean section ≥ 1.5 h (OR 3.90, 95%CI: 1.28-5.42), estimated blood loss ≥ 400 ml (OR 2.35, 95%CI: 1.10-4.37) and the duration of urinary catheter ≥ 24 h (OR 3.18, 95% CI: 1.21-5.71) were the independent risk factors of surgical site infection after cesarean section (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Age, BMI, duration of surgery, blood loss and urinary catheter use were associated with higher risk of the surgical site infection after cesarean section. Clinical preventions and interventions are warranted for those population to reduce the occurrence of surgical site infection.

Cefazolin prophylaxis in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery - are dosage and timing appropriate? Prospective study using resampling simulation

OBJECTIVE

Cefazolin is a widely used antimicrobial prophylactic agent, however the appropriate dosage, timing, pharmacology and microbial coverage have not been well-established for gynecologic procedures. We aimed to describe serum concentrations and pharmacokinetics of Intravenous cefazolin given to women prior to scheduled minimally invasive gynecologic surgeries, and to determine whether appropriate antimicrobial coverage had been achieved in short time from prophylactic administration to surgical start time.

METHODS

A prospective cohort analysis study, using a resampled dataset, of women undergoing scheduled gynecological surgeries in a university affiliated tertiary medical center. IV cefazolin (1 or 2 gr) was administered prior to incision to women weighing <80 kg (Group A) and ≥80 kg (Group B), respectively. Cefazolin serum levels were obtained at the time of skin incision (Time 0) and 30 min later (Time 30), measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC). Appropriate antimicrobial coverage was defined when cefazolin serum levels were above minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) for Enterobacteriaceae.

RESULTS

Overall, 21 women were included. The mean time interval between drug administration and incision did not differ between the two groups (18 ± 10 min vs. 11 ± 10 min, respectively, p = .0.25). A hierarchical mixed linear regression model, using a simulation of multiple random bootstrap resampling (n = 1,000), revealed that cefazolin serum levels exceeded MIC, regardless of the timing of administration in the sampling intervals. Mean cefazolin serum levels in time 0 and time 30 min were not affected by BMI in patients receiving 1 gr.

CONCLUSION

A single dose of IV cefazolin given shortly prior to skin incision provides serum concentrations above minimal inhibitory concentrations for susceptible pathogens in most women undergoing scheduled minimally invasive gynecologic surgery.

Periprocedural Peritonitis Prophylaxis: A Summary of the Microbiology and the Role of Systemic Antimicrobials

Background

Peritonitis is a leading complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD). One strategy that the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD) has used to help mitigate the morbidity and mortality associated with peritonitis is through prevention, including antibiotic prophylaxis utilization in high-risk situations. The aim of this study is to summarize our current understanding of postprocedural peritonitis and discuss the existing data behind periprocedural antibiotic prophylaxis, focusing primarily on PD catheter insertion, dental procedures, colonoscopies, upper endoscopies with gastrostomy, and gynecologic procedures.

Summary

The ISPD currently recommends intravenous antibiotics prior to PD catheter insertion, colonoscopies, and invasive gynecologic procedures, though prophylaxis has only demonstrated benefit in a prospective, randomized control setting for PD catheter insertion. However, multiple retrospective studies exist that support the use of antibiotic prophylaxis for the other 2 procedures. No specific antibiotic regimen has been established as most optimal to prevent peritonitis for any of the 3 procedures. Antibiotic coverage should include the Enterobacteriaceae family, as well as Gram-positive organisms commonly found on the skin flora for PD catheter insertion, anaerobes for colonoscopies, and common organisms from the urogenital flora in gynecologic procedures. Additionally, the ISPD currently recommends oral amoxicillin prior to dental procedures. There is currently no ISPD recommendation to provide antibiotic prophylaxis prior to an upper endoscopy with or without gastrostomy, though this is a potential area for research.

Key Messages

PD patients are at high risk for developing peritonitis after typical procedures. Antibiotic prophylaxis is a potential strategy that the ISPD utilizes to prevent these infections. However, further research needs to be done to determine the optimal antibiotic regimen.

The implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols in ovarian malignancy surgery

The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) refers to multimodal interventions to reduce the length of hospital stay and complications at various steps of perioperative care. It was first developed in colorectal surgery and later embraced by other surgical disciplines including gynecologic oncology. The ERAS Society recently published guidelines for gynecologic cancer surgeries to enhance patient recovery. However, limitations exist in the implementation of the guidelines in ovarian cancer patients due to the distinct characteristics of the disease. In the present review, we discuss the results that have been published in the literature to date regarding the ERAS protocols in ovarian cancer patients, and explain why more evidence needs to be specifically assessed in this type of malignancy among other gynecologic cancers.

Risk factors of vaginal cuff infection in women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign gynecological diseases

AIM

This study aimed to identify the risk factors for vaginal cuff infection after laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign gynecological diseases.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study among 1559 Japanese women who underwent total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) for benign indications between 2014 and 2018 at Teine Keijinkai Hospital in Sapporo, Japan. All patients received preoperative antibiotics based on appropriate timing, choice, and weight-based dosing. We assessed the risk factors of vaginal cuff infection after TLH, including demographic and clinical variables, and patient- and surgery-related factors, using univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

Among all the patients who underwent TLH, 71 cases of vaginal cuff infections (4.6%) were recorded. Univariate analyses showed that current smoking, pathological result of adenomyosis, use of Seprafilm as an antiadhesive material, white blood cell counts on postoperative day (POD) 2, C-reactive protein (CRP) level on POD2 and postoperative vaginal cuff hematoma were significantly associated with an increased risk of vaginal cuff infection. In multivariate analysis, current smoking, use of seprafilm, CRP level on POD2 and vaginal cuff hematoma were significantly associated with an increased risk of vaginal cuff infection.

CONCLUSION

Current smoking, use of seprafilm, CRP level on POD2 and vaginal cuff hematoma were identified as significant risk factors of vaginal cuff infection in the 30 days after surgery in Japanese women who underwent TLH for benign indications.

A case report of streptococcal toxic shock syndrome caused by Streptococcus mitis in a healthy adult

BACKGROUND

Streptococcal toxic shock syndrome (STSS) is an acute, multisystem and toxin-mediated disease that usually causes shock and multiple organ failure in the early stages of its clinical course. It is associated with a substantial increase in mortality rate. The disease has been associated with invasive group A Streptococcus and is rarely caused by Streptococcus mitis (S. mitis). In healthy adults, S. mitis is closely related to endocarditis but rarely related to STSS.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a case of STSS caused by S. mitis in a healthy 45-year-old woman. She presented with fever 14 h after surgery and with hypotension 24 h later, and she subsequently suffered from septic shock, low albumin, dysfunction of coagulation, acute kidney dysfunction, respiratory alkalosis and metabolic acidosis, acute respiratory distress syndrome and cellulitis of the incision. The diagnosis was obtained through clinical manifestation and blood culture examination. The patient was treated with aggressive fluid resuscitation, adequate antibiotics for a total of 4 weeks, respiratory support, and surgical debridement and drainage of the incision. She was discharged after her vital signs returned to normal and the incision healed on day 40 after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnosis of STSS is often delayed or missed, which leads to a high mortality rate. It is possible to cure patients if the disease can be identified early and treated with aggressive fluid resuscitation, adequate antibiotics and control of the source of infection. Clinicians should consider the disease in the differential diagnosis of septic shock to prevent death.

Prophylactic antibiotics for preventing genital tract infection in women undergoing surgical procedures for incomplete abortion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Findings about the effect of prophylactic antibiotics in preventing genital tract infection (GTI) associated with surgical procedures used for incomplete abortions are conflicting. Some reported a decrease in infection associated with the use of antibiotic prophylaxis, whereas others found no significant reduction in GTI.

OBJECTIVE

To synthesise systematically the evidence on the effect of prophylactic antibiotics compared with placebo in women undergoing surgical procedures for incomplete abortion.

SEARCH STRATEGY

In February 2020, PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central for Register of Controlled Trials were searched for relevant published randomised controlled trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials reporting GTI following surgical procedures for incomplete abortion and comparing antibiotic prophylaxis with placebo.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Meta-analysis using inverse variance heterogeneity model included subgroup and sensitivity analyses determined a priori were conducted. The quality of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 16 178 women who participated in 24 eligible randomised controlled trials published between 1975 and 2019 were included. Pooled estimates showed the risk of GTI following surgical procedures after incomplete abortion was significantly lower among those who had prophylactic antibiotics (relative risk [RR] = 0.72; 95% CI 0.58-0.90; I²  = 49%). There was no significant effect of antibiotics in women in low- and middle-income countries (three studies, 3579 participants, RR = 0.90; 95% CI 0.50-1.62; I²  = 63%), but it was clinically and statistically significant among women high-income countries (21 studies, 12 599 participants, RR = 0.67; 95% CI 0.53-0.84; I²  = 44%), with a strong level of evidence as assessed by GRADE.

CONCLUSION

This study provides evidence that antibiotic prophylaxis is beneficial in reducing post-abortion GTI among women undergoing surgical procedures for incomplete abortion. More studies are needed from low- and middle-income countries.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Prophylactic antibiotics after incomplete abortion are effective in reducing GTI. More studies are needed from low- and middle-income countries.

Effectiveness of 10% povidone-iodine formulation on preoperative vaginal irrigation

AIM

To investigate the effectiveness of 10% povidone-iodine formulation as a vaginal irrigation agent in patients undergoing hysterectomy to prevent postoperative infection.

METHODS

The prevalence of postoperative infection in 277 and 132 patients who underwent preoperative vaginal cleaning with 500 mL of distilled water and 20 mL of 10% povidone-iodine solution, respectively, were compared in this retrospective study.

RESULTS

Postoperative infection was observed in 15.6% of the overall patient population. The rate of postoperative infection was significantly higher in patients treated with 10% povidone-iodine formulation than in those treated with distilled water (21.4% vs 12.8%, P = 0.040). Besides the agents of vaginal irrigation, operation time, length of hospital stay and rate of intraoperative complications affected the prevalence of postoperative infection. The multivariate analysis ranked the use of 10% povidone-iodine formulation for vaginal irrigation as the second top factor contributing to postoperative infection (relative risk: 1.9 when compared to distilled water).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative vaginal irrigation with 10% povidone-iodine formulation led to a significantly higher rate of postoperative infection than did preoperative vaginal irrigation with distilled water. For vaginal irrigation with povidone-iodine, different concentrations and cleaning methods should be considered in the future.

Symptomatic pelvic hematoma following hysterectomy: risk factors, bacterial pathogens and clinical outcome

Background

Pelvic hematoma is a common finding following hysterectomy which at times may become infected causing substantial morbidity. The aim of this study was to describe the incidence, clinical manifestation and identify risk factors for infected pelvic hematoma. We also attempted to identify specific bacterial pathogens which may cause this phenomenon.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary university teaching hospital. Included were all women who underwent hysterectomy and were diagnosed with a pelvic hematoma following surgery from 2013 to 2018. In an attempt to assess possible risk factors for infected pelvic hematoma women with asymptomatic pelvic hematoma were compared to women with an infected pelvic hematoma.

Results

During the study period 648 women underwent hysterectomy at our medical center. Pelvic hematoma was diagnosed by imaging in 50 women (7.7%) including 41 women who underwent vaginal hysterectomy and 9 women who underwent abdominal hysterectomy. In 14 (2.2%) cases the hematoma became infected resulting in need for readmission and further treatment. Women who underwent vaginal surgery were more likely to return with infected pelvic hematoma compared to women who underwent open abdominal or laparoscopic surgery (4.5% vs. 1.1%, p < 0.05). In 8 women bacterial growth from hematoma culture was noted. Enterococcus faecalis, was the most abundant pathogen to be isolated in this sub-group.

Conclusion

Vaginal route of hysterectomy is a risk factor for infected pelvic hematoma following hysterectomy. Most of these infections were caused by anaerobic bacteria which may not be sufficiently covered by current antibiotic prophylactic regimens.

Cystoscopy with antibiotic irrigation during pelvic reconstruction and minimally invasive gynecologic surgery: A double-blind randomized controlled trial

AIMS

After pelvic reconstructive surgery, the risk of postoperative urinary tract infection (UTI) is significant; intraoperative cystoscopy may contribute to this risk. Intravesical antibiotics are used in the ambulatory setting and may be applied to the surgical arena. Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy of antibiotic irrigation during intraoperative cystoscopy to prevent postoperative UTI.

METHODS

This double-blind randomized controlled trial enrolled 216 women undergoing cystoscopy with elective surgery for pelvic organ prolapse, stress urinary incontinence, or laparoscopic gynecologic surgery at an academic medical center 2016-2019. Participants were randomized to cystoscopic irrigation fluid type: normal saline (control) or 200,000 U polymyxin B + 40 mg neomycin solution in normal saline (antibiotic). Patients and providers who treated UTIs were blinded. The primary outcome was treatment of UTI within 6 weeks postoperatively, defined as positive culture or treatment for a symptomatic UTI. χ² and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

We enrolled 216 women: 111 control (51.4%) and 105 antibiotic (48.6%). Mean age was 51.6 years. Groups were well matched in medical comorbidities and surgery type. Primary vaginal surgery was most common (n = 127, 58.8%). Overall, 10.7% of patients developed a postoperative UTI with no difference in incidence between groups: 9.9% of control (n = 11, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.0%-16.0%) versus 11.4% of antibiotic subjects (n = 12, 95% CI: 5.0%-18.0%), on χ² (p = .718) and logistic regression analysis (adjusted odds ratio, 1.3; CI: 0.53-3.16; p = .569).

CONCLUSION

When cystoscopy is performed during elective pelvic surgery, use of antibiotic irrigation does not impact the rate of postoperative UTI.

The Use of Hysteroscopy for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Intrauterine Pathology: ACOG Committee Opinion, Number 800

This Committee Opinion provides guidance on the current uses of hysteroscopy in the office and the operating room for the diagnosis and treatment of intrauterine pathology and the potential associated complications. General considerations for the use of diagnostic and operative hysteroscopy include managing distending media, timing for optimal visualization, and cervical preparations. In premenopausal women with regular menstrual cycles, the optimal timing for diagnostic hysteroscopy is during the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle after menstruation. Pregnancy should be reasonably excluded before performing hysteroscopy. There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine cervical ripening before diagnostic or operative hysteroscopy, but it may be considered for those patients at higher risk of cervical stenosis or increased pain with the surgical procedure. In randomized trials, patients reported a preference for office-based hysteroscopy, and office-based procedures are associated with higher patient satisfaction and faster recovery when compared with hospital-based operative hysteroscopy. Other potential benefits of office hysteroscopy include patient and physician convenience, avoidance of general anesthesia, less patient anxiety related to familiarity with the office setting, cost effectiveness, and more efficient use of the operating room for more complex hysteroscopic cases. Appropriate patient selection for office-based hysteroscopic procedures for women with known uterine pathology relies on thorough knowledge and understanding of the target pathology, size of the lesion, depth of penetration of the lesion, patient willingness to undergo an office-based procedure, physician skills and expertise, assessment of patient comorbidities, and availability of proper equipment and patient support. Both the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (AAGL) agree that vaginoscopy may be considered when performing office hysteroscopy because studies have shown that it can significantly reduce procedural pain with similar efficacy. The office hysteroscopy analgesia regimens commonly described in the literature include a single agent or a combination of multiple agents, including a topical anesthetic, a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug, acetaminophen, a benzodiazepine, an opiate, and an intracervical or paracervical block, or both. Based on the currently available evidence, there is no clinically significant difference in safety or effectiveness of these regimens for pain management when compared to each other or placebo. Patient safety and comfort must be prioritized when performing office hysteroscopic procedures. Patients have the right to expect the same level of patient safety as is present in the hospital or ambulatory surgery setting.

Antibiotic prophylaxis for urodynamic testing in women: a systematic review

Introduction and hypothesis

Urinary tract infection is the most common complication after urodynamic studies (UDS). Practice guidelines recommend against antibiotic prophylaxis based on an outdated review of the literature, which advised on the premise of “a lack of good quality studies” and based on an assumed low incidence not consistently supported by the literature.

Objectives

This systematic review aims to update the assessment of the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis compared with placebo or no treatment for prevention of urinary tract infection in females over the age of 18 years undergoing UDS.

Methods

MEDLINE, EMBASE, COCHRANE, DISSERTATIONS, conference proceedings and clinical trial registries were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials. Two authors independently screened and selected articles, assessed these for quality according to Cochrane guidelines and extracted their data.

Results

A total of 2633 records were screened, identifying three relevant randomized controlled trials. The one study that was critically appraised as being the least likely biased showed a statistically significant effect of antibiotic prophylaxis in reducing bacteriuria post UDS in female patients. The other two studies included in the review did not. None of the studies included were powered to show a significant change in the incidence of urinary tract infection following UDS in female patients receiving antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis.

Conclusions

Similar to the 2012 Cochrane review on this subject, this systematic review demonstrated that antibiotic prophylaxis may decrease bacteriuria in women post UDS; however, further research is required to assess its effect on urinary tract infections in this context.

Reproductive outcome after early pregnancy loss treated with misoprostol versus surgical aspiration

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does long-term reproductive outcome after early pregnancy loss (EPL) differ between women who are treated with misoprostol and surgical aspiration.

DESIGN

A historic cohort study of all women who were diagnosed with early pregnancy loss (≤12 weeks), in a single medical centre, between September 2016 and August 2017, was conducted. The women were treated with either misoprostol or surgical aspiration according to their own preferences. Women who were lost to follow-up or did not attempt to conceive again were excluded. The primary outcome measure was the cumulative pregnancy rate within 12 months from intervention.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were comparable between women who received misoprostol (n = 163) and women who underwent surgical aspiration (n = 122). Women who received misoprostol had a higher rate of interventions for retained products of conception (11.0% versus 3.3%, respectively; P = 0.015). The misoprostol and the surgical aspiration groups did not differ in rate of repeated miscarriages (17.8% versus 21.3%, respectively; P = 0.45), or pregnancy rate within 6 months (58.3% versus 50.0%, respectively; P = 0.16), 12 months (78.5% versus 78.7%, respectively; P = 0.97) and 24 months (92.0% versus 91.8%, respectively; P = 0.94). Live birth rate within 24 months was comparable (62.0% versus 58.2%, respectively; P = 0.52), as well as gestational age at birth (38.5 versus 38.6 weeks, respectively; P = 0.81) and birthweight (3295 versus 3161 g, respectively; P = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term reproductive outcomes are comparable in women with EPL who are treated with either misoprostol or surgical aspiration. Our findings may help counselling patients facing EPL who have concerns about their future reproduction.

Antibiotic prophylaxis for gynecologic cancer surgery

OBJECTIVES

The use of prophylactic antibiotics in elective gynecologic cancer surgery is essential. We aimed to establish the optimal duration of antibiotic administration to reduce the overuse of antibiotics in gynecologic cancer surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study based on the descriptive and statistical analysis of the clinical records of patients who underwent a radical hysterectomy or staging operation for gynecologic cancer between January 2014 and October 2015 at Busan Paik Hospital. Postoperative outcomes, such as surgical site infection (SSI), urinary tract infection (UTI), length of hospital stay, duration of urinary catheterization, and duration of surgical drainage, were compared between the antibiotic prophylaxis for 1-day and greater than 1-day groups.

RESULTS

A total of 139 patients were included in the study. There were 79 patients in the 1-day group (56.8%) and 60 patients in the >1-day (43.2%) group. The two groups were similar in terms of demographics, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, stage, surgical approach, and type of operation. Blood loss was smaller in the 1-day group than in the >1-day group (582.2 ± 278.3 cc vs. 795.9 ± 617.9 cc, P = 0.007). The average length of hospital stay was shorter in the 1-day group than in the >1-day group (10.8 ± 2.7 days vs. 11.8 ± 2.8 days, P = 0.039). The rate of SSI and UTI was not significantly different between the 1-day and >1-day groups (6.3% vs. 8.2% and 11.4% vs. 6.7%, respectively [P = 0.903 and P = 0.393]).

CONCLUSION

One-day first generation cephalosporin administration is appropriate for preventing post-surgical complications such as wound infections, UTIs, and vaginal cuff cellulitis in gynecologic cancer surgery.

Transcervical drainage of abdominal-pelvic abscess after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Abdominopelvic abscess is a serious, but infrequent, postoperative complication of sacrocolpopexy, which a priori requires a second surgery to debride the affected tissue and dry out the infected mesh in addition to a prolonged broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy.

METHODS

We present two cases of post-surgical abdominopelvic abscesses, treated with conservative management using ultrasound-guided transcervical drainage and prolonged antibiotic therapy. Both patients underwent a favorable evolution without needing the removal of the mesh.

CONCLUSIONS

Because of the search for new alternatives to avoid mesh removal and the comorbidity associated with a second surgery, transcervical drainage is a treatment to be considered in selected cases.

Effectiveness of cervical pessary compared to cervical cerclage with or without vaginal progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth in women with twin pregnancies and a short cervix: study protocol for a two-by-two factorial randomised clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Women with twin pregnancies and a short cervix are at increased risk for preterm birth (PTB). Given the burden of prematurity and its attendant risks, the quest for effective interventions in twins has been an area of considerable research. Studies investigating the effectiveness of cervical cerclage, cervical pessary and vaginal progesterone in preventing PTB have yielded conflicting results. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of cervical pessary and cervical cerclage with or without vaginal progesterone to prevent PTB in women with twin pregnancies and a cervical length (CL) ≤ 28 mm.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This multicentre, randomised clinical trial will be conducted at My Duc Hospital and My Duc Phu Nhuan Hospital, Vietnam. Asymptomatic women with twin pregnancies and a CL ≤28 mm, measured at 16-22 weeks' gestation, will be randomised in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive a cerclage, pessary, cerclage plus progesterone or pessary plus progesterone. Primary outcome will be PTB <34 weeks. Secondary outcomes will be maternal and neonatal complications. We preplanned a subgroup analysis according to CL from all women after randomisation and divided into four quartiles. Analysis will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis. The rate of PTB <34 weeks' gestation in women with twin pregnancies and a cervix ≤28 mm and treated with pessary in our previous study at My Duc Hospital was 24.2%. A sample size of 340 women will be required to show or refute that cervical cerclage decreases the rate of PTB <34 weeks by 50% compared with pessary (from 24.2% to 12.1%, α level 0.05, power 80%, 5% lost to follow-up and protocol deviation). This study is not to be powered to assess interactions between interventions.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee of My Duc Hospital and informed patient consent was obtained before study enrolment. Results of the study will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03863613 (date of registration: 4 March 2019).

Hysterosalpingography in endometriosis: performance and interpretation

Endometriosis is often seen and sometimes initially diagnosed on hysterosalpingography (HSG), an imaging exam routinely performed on patients with infertility. Here we discuss the role of HSG in the evaluation of patients with infertility with a focus on patients with endometriosis. The HSG technique, including patient preparation as well as potential risks and complications, is detailed. Imaging findings in patients with endometriosis are illustrated and a template for exam reporting is presented. Common imaging pitfalls are described with examples.

Risk of Urinary Tract Infection Symptoms after Posthysterectomy Cystoscopy with 50% Dextrose as Compared with Saline Cystoscopy with Indigo Carmine

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Compare odds of postoperative urinary symptoms in women who had cystoscopy after benign laparoscopic hysterectomy with 50% dextrose and with normal saline solution with intravenous indigo carmine.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Two tertiary care centers.

PATIENTS

All women who underwent benign laparoscopic hysterectomy and intraoperative cystoscopy carried out by a single surgeon.

INTERVENTIONS

We compared postoperative urinary symptoms in patients who received 50% dextrose cystoscopy fluid (January 2016-June 2017) with those who received saline cystoscopy with intravenous indigo carmine (November 2013-April 2014).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 96 patients had cystoscopy with 50% dextrose and 104 with normal saline with intravenous indigo carmine. Differences in baseline characteristics of the two groups of participants mainly reflected institutional population diversity: age (45.2 vs 41.9, p = .01), body mass index (26.9 vs 33.4, p <.01), race, current smoking status (1% vs 7.8%, p = .04), diabetes (2.1% vs 11.5%, p = .01), history of abdominal surgery (53.1% vs 74%, p <.01), hysterectomy type, receipt of intraoperative antibiotics (92.7% vs 100%, p <.01), recatheterization (10.4% vs 0%, p <.01), and removal of catheter on postoperative day 0 (66.7% vs 12.5%, p <.01). Urinary symptoms were similar for 50% dextrose and saline (12.5% vs 7.7%, p = .19). After adjusting for age, body mass index, race, diabetes, and day of catheter removal, there remained no significant differences in urinary symptoms between the groups (odds ratio 3.19 [95% confidence interval, 0.82-12.35], p = .09). One immediate bladder injury was detected in the saline group and 1 delayed lower urinary tract injury in the 50% dextrose group.

CONCLUSION

Overall, most women experienced no urinary symptoms after benign laparoscopic hysterectomy. There were no significant differences in postoperative urinary symptoms or empiric treatment of urinary tract infection after the use of 50% dextrose cystoscopy fluid as compared with normal saline. The previous finding of increased odds of urinary tract infection after dextrose cystoscopy may be due to use in a high-risk population.

Vaginal preparation with antiseptic solution before cesarean section for preventing postoperative infections

BACKGROUND

Cesarean delivery is one of the most common surgical procedures performed by obstetricians. Infectious morbidity after cesarean delivery can have a tremendous impact on the postpartum woman's return to normal function and her ability to care for her baby. Despite the widespread use of prophylactic antibiotics, postoperative infectious morbidity still complicates cesarean deliveries. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2010 and subsequently updated in 2012, twice in 2014, in 2017 and 2018.

OBJECTIVES

To determine if cleansing the vagina with an antiseptic solution before a cesarean delivery decreases the risk of maternal infectious morbidities, including endometritis and wound complications. We also assessed the side effects of vaginal cleansing solutions to determine adverse events associated with the intervention.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (7 July 2019), and reference lists of retrieved studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs assessing the impact of vaginal cleansing immediately before cesarean delivery with any type of antiseptic solution versus a placebo solution/standard of care on post-cesarean infectious morbidity. Cluster-RCTs were eligible for inclusion, but we did not identify any. We excluded trials that utilized vaginal preparation during labor or that did not use antibiotic surgical prophylaxis. We also excluded any trials using a cross-over design. We included trials published in abstract form only if sufficient information was present in the abstract on methods and outcomes to analyze.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

At least three of the review authors independently assessed eligibility of the studies. Two review authors were assigned to extract study characteristics, quality assessments, and data from eligible studies.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 21 trials, reporting results for 7038 women evaluating the effects of vaginal cleansing (17 using povidone-iodine, 3 chlorhexidine, 1 benzalkonium chloride) on post-cesarean infectious morbidity. Trials used vaginal preparations administered by sponge sticks, douches, or soaked gauze wipes. The control groups were typically no vaginal preparation (17 trials) or the use of a saline vaginal preparation (4 trials). One trial did not report on any outcomes of interest. Trials were performed in 10 different countries (Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Iran, Thailand, Turkey, USA, Egypt, UK, Kenya and India). The overall risk of bias was low for areas of attrition, reporting, and other bias. About half of the trials had low risk of selection bias, with most of the remainder rated as unclear. Due to lack of blinding, we rated performance bias as high risk in nearly one-third of the trials, low risk in one-third, and unclear in one-third. Vaginal preparation with antiseptic solution immediately before cesarean delivery probably reduces the incidence of post-cesarean endometritis from 7.1% in control groups to 3.1% in vaginal cleansing groups (average risk ratio (aRR) 0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.29 to 0.58; 20 trials, 6918 women; moderate-certainty evidence). This reduction in endometritis was seen for both iodine-based solutions and chlorhexidine-based solutions. Risks of postoperative fever and postoperative wound infection are also probably reduced by vaginal antiseptic preparation (fever: aRR 0.64, 0.50 to 0.82; 16 trials, 6163 women; and wound infection: RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.77; 18 trials, 6385 women; both moderate-certainty evidence). Two trials found that there may be a lower risk of a composite outcome of wound complication or endometritis in women receiving preoperative vaginal preparation (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.82; 2 trials, 499 women; low-certainty evidence). No adverse effects were reported with either the povidone-iodine or chlorhexidine vaginal cleansing. Subgroup analysis suggested a greater effect with vaginal preparations for those women in labour versus those not in labour for four out of five outcomes examined (post-cesarean endometritis; postoperative fever; postoperative wound infection; composite wound complication or endometritis). This apparent difference needs to be investigated further in future trials. We did not observe any subgroup differences between women with ruptured membranes and women with intact membranes.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Vaginal preparation with povidone-iodine or chlorhexidine solution compared to saline or not cleansing immediately before cesarean delivery probably reduces the risk of post-cesarean endometritis, postoperative fever, and postoperative wound infection. Subgroup analysis found that these benefits were typically present whether iodine-based or chlorhexidine-based solutions were used and when women were in labor before the cesarean. The suggested benefit in women in labor needs further investigation in future trials. There was moderate-certainty evidence using GRADE for all reported outcomes, with downgrading decisions based on limitations in study design or imprecision. As a simple intervention, providers may consider implementing preoperative vaginal cleansing with povidone-iodine or chlorhexidine before performing cesarean deliveries. Future research on this intervention being incorporated into bundles of care plans for women receiving cesarean delivery will be needed.

Adherence to Guideline-Based Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Gynecology among Alabama Providers

OBJECTIVES

Surgical site infection (SSI) is a preventable cause of postoperative morbidity. The appropriate use of perioperative antibiotics for prevention of SSIs is a well-established quality metric. Little is known about the adherence to guidelines-based antibiotic prophylaxis among Alabama obstetricians and gynecologists. Our aims were to determine their adherence to guidelines-based antibiotic prophylaxis and identify the factors that are predictive of nonadherence.

METHODS

Online, self-administered survey of Alabama obstetricians and gynecologists.

RESULTS

Providers reported not providing the indicated antibiotics and/or giving nonindicated antibiotics in almost all surgical scenarios. The exceptions included hysterectomies, in which almost all (96%) providers routinely gave indicated antibiotics. No providers reported giving antibiotics during intrauterine device placement or endometrial biopsies, which is appropriate. The only factor predictive of inappropriate antibiotic use was the absence of a standing antibiotic protocol.

CONCLUSIONS

Alabama gynecologic surgeons can and should improve their compliance with guidelines-based antibiotic prophylaxis. More research is needed to determine which interventions would improve adherence in this provider population; our study suggests that the implementation of a standing antibiotic protocol may be a reasonable first step.

[Evaluation of compliance with the antibiotic prophylaxis protocol in hysterectomy. Prospective cohort study]

Objetivo

Las infecciones relacionadas con la asistencia sanitaria (IRAS) son un problema de salud pública, siendo las infecciones de localización quirúrgica (ILQ) las más frecuentes a nivel hospitalario. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar el efecto de la adecuación de la profilaxis antibiótica en la incidencia de infección quirúrgica en pacientes histerectomizadas.

Material y métodos

Se realizó un estudio de cohortes prospectivo entre octubre de 2009 y diciembre de 2018. Se estudió la incidencia de ILQ durante los primeros 30 días tras la cirugía. Se evaluó el grado de adecuación de la profilaxis antibiótica en histerectomía y el efecto de su inadecuación en la incidencia de infección con el riesgo relativo (RR) ajustado mediante un modelo de regresión logística.

Resultados

Se estudiaron 1.025 intervenciones en 1.022 mujeres. La incidencia acumulada de ILQ fue del 2,1% (n=22) y la etiología más frecuente Escherichia coli (23,1%) y Proteus mirabilis (23,1%). La profilaxis antibiótica estaba indicada en 1.014 intervenciones (98,9%) administrándose en 1.009 de ellas (99,5%), con una adecuación general al protocolo del 92,5%. La causa principal de no cumplimiento fue el tiempo de inicio (40,9%), seguida por la elección del antibiótico (35,2%). El efecto de la inadecuación de la profilaxis sobre la incidencia de infección fue de RR=0,9; IC95% 0,2-3,9; p>0,05.

Conclusiones

La adecuación de la profilaxis antibiótica fue muy alta, con una baja incidencia de infección quirúrgica. No se encontró asociación entre adecuación de la profilaxis e incidencia de infección en histerectomía. Se debe insistir en la mejora continua de la vigilancia epidemiológica en ginecología.

Bacterial vaginosis and surgical site infections

Bacterial vaginosis is the most common cause of abnormal vaginal discharge or malodor, affecting up to one third of US women. Most women with bacterial vaginosis are unaware of the infection, making it difficult to diagnose in the absence of a microscopic examination of vaginal discharge or using point-of-care testing. Untreated bacterial vaginosis elevates the risk of postoperative surgical infections in women undergoing obstetric and gynecological procedures. Treatment with antimicrobial agents that target bacterial vaginosis has been shown to reduce the rate of postoperative infections following hysterectomy and surgical abortions. Furthermore, in a cost-comparison model, screening for and treatment of bacterial vaginosis prior to hysterectomy was shown to be superior to no screening in terms of infection rates and cost. The bacterial vaginosis diagnostic criteria are simple and screening tests are inexpensive; bacterial vaginosis screening is a relatively fast process in patients who present for preoperative appointments. Treatment options approved by the Food and Drug Administration include metronidazole, clindamycin, tinidazole, and secnidazole. Given the prevalence of bacterial vaginosis and the risks associated with operating on a woman with untreated bacterial vaginosis, women undergoing hysterectomy, surgical abortion, and potentially cesarean delivery should be screened for bacterial vaginosis, and those who screen positive should be treated with an appropriate antimicrobial agent.

Management of Acute Obstructive Uterovaginal Anomalies: ACOG Committee Opinion, Number 779

Obstructive uterovaginal anomalies may present after puberty with amenorrhea, dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain, recurrent vaginal discharge, or infertility. The evaluation of a patient with a suspected obstructive reproductive anomaly should include a detailed medical history, physical examination, and imaging. The genital examination is critical to differentiate a patient with an imperforate hymen from a patient with labial adhesions, urogenital sinus, transverse vaginal septum, or distal vaginal atresia. Pelvic ultrasonography is the initial imaging method recommended for a patient with cyclic pain and amenorrhea or a patient with persistent dysmenorrhea. It is important to note that diagnosis of a uterine or vaginal anomaly by imaging before puberty can be challenging and misleading because of the small size of the prepubertal uterus and the lack of endometrial stimulation and menstrual distention of the vagina. Consultation with a radiologist experienced with imaging of uterovaginal anomalies may be helpful to determine the most accurate diagnosis. In general, obstructive vaginal and uterine anomalies are not surgical emergencies, and the complexities of these conditions are best managed by gynecologic care providers familiar with the surgical management of these conditions. Given the high risk of stenosis and complications associated with transverse vaginal septum, distal vaginal atresia, and cervical atresia, referral to a center with expertise in the management of these anomalies is paramount. The best long-term outcome is achieved with a complete evaluation, clear understanding of the anomaly, mobilization of appropriate surgical resources, sufficient preoperative counseling, and planned surgical intervention.

Incorporating Precesarean Vaginal Preparation Into Standard of Care for Obstetrics

Postoperative infections remain a serious concern after cesarean delivery, the most common major surgical procedure in the United States. Multiple strategies have been proposed to combat this problem, including the addition of azithromycin to the standard preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. However, as obstetricians, we have failed to uniformly adopt precesarean vaginal preparation despite convincing evidence from randomized controlled trials that this technique reduces postoperative rates of endometritis by more than 50%. This reduction is similar to that seen with the addition of azithromycin. Vaginal preparation with povidone-iodine solution may target the same genital pathogens as azithromycin, which are commonly implicated in endometritis, a polymicrobial infection that may be under-addressed by our current antiseptic techniques. A recent review of maternal-fetal medicine fellows' practices at the time of cesarean delivery and recent publications on precesarean vaginal cleansing suggest that this practice has not yet gained hold in the United States.

Wound Complication Rates After Vulvar Excisions for Premalignant Lesions

OBJECTIVE

To assess the rate of wound complications and evaluate the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in vulvar wide local excision procedures.

METHODS

We performed a single-institution, retrospective cohort study of women undergoing vulvar surgery for premalignant lesions between January 2007 and January 2017. The primary outcome was a composite wound complication rate that included breakdown or infection within 8 weeks postoperatively. Data were analyzed using Fisher exact or χ test, Student t-test, and Poisson regression.

RESULTS

Wound complications occurred in 154 (28.7%) of the 537 patients. Mean age was 52 years; most patients were white (83.1%), cigarette smokers (65.2%), had no prior vulvar treatment (54.4%), and had a preoperative diagnosis of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (vulvar HSIL) (70.0%). The presence of other predisposing factors was similar between groups. In multivariate analysis, smoking (odds ratio [OR] 1.64, 95% CI 1.14-2.38) and primary rather than repeat vulvar surgery (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.31-3.01) were associated with increased risk for wound complications. There was no significant difference in wound complications between women who received preoperative antibiotics and those who did not (30.4% vs 27.4%, P=.45), although the mean length of wound separation in the antibiotic group was shorter (1 vs 2 cm, P=.03).

CONCLUSION

Wound complications are common among women undergoing surgery for vulvar HSIL, and interventional trials are warranted to evaluate the role of smoking cessation and prophylactic antibiotics to reduce postoperative morbidity.

Optimizing Preanesthesia Care for the Gynecologic Patient

In the past, best practices for perioperative management have been based as much on dogma as science. The creation of optimized perioperative pathways, known as enhanced recovery after surgery, has been shown to simultaneously improve patient outcomes and reduce cost. In this article, we critically review interventions (and omission of interventions) that should be considered by every surgical team to optimize preanesthesia care. This includes patient education, properly managing existing medical comorbidities, optimizing nutrition, and the use of medications before incision that have been shown to reduce surgical stress, opioid requirements, and postoperative complications. Anesthetic techniques, the use of adjunct medications administered after incision, and postoperative management are beyond the scope of this review. When possible, we have relied on randomized trials, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews to support our recommendations. In some instances, we have drawn from the general and colorectal surgery literature if evidence in gynecologic surgery is limited or of poor quality. In particular, hospital systems should aim to adhere to antibiotic and thromboembolic prophylaxis for 100% of patients, the mantra, "nil by mouth after midnight" should be abandoned in favor of adopting a preoperative diet that maintains euvolemia and energy stores to optimize healing, and bowel preparation should be abandoned for patients undergoing gynecologic surgery for benign indications and minimally invasive gynecologic surgery.

Efficacy of Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Hysteroscopy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and side effects of antibiotic prophylaxis compared with placebo or no treatment in women undergoing hysteroscopy.

DATA SOURCES

A structured search was carried out in PubMed-Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register databases through December 31, 2018.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

The search included a combination of the following terms: "hysteroscopy," "endoscopic surgery," "antibiotic prophylaxis." The following outcomes were selected: postoperative fever, infection rate, pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) and abscess occurrence, postoperative antibiotic requirement, and side effects occurrence (lower abdominal pain, vomiting, diarrhea, anaphylactic reaction). A random-effects model was used at meta-analysis. Study quality and bias risk were assessed with the Cochrane tool.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

Five randomized controlled trials comparing efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis with placebo or no treatment were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, pooled incidence of events was very low in both groups (fever, 3.79% vs 1.8%; overall infection, .52% vs .58%; postoperative antibiotic therapy, 1.18% vs 1.32%; and lower abdominal pain, 12.46% vs 9.31%). Moreover, the incidence of serious infections requiring further actions (PID or abscess) appeared to be extremely low (.2% in pretreated women and none in control groups). No one trial individually or the pooled analysis showed a statistically significant benefit of antibiotics prophylaxis over placebo for the outcome considered.

CONCLUSION

The use of antibiotics appears not to be beneficial to prevent infection after hysteroscopy; however, the lack of high-quality studies makes it difficult to draw firm conclusions. Considering the very low infection rate highlighted after hysteroscopic procedures, a difference will probably never be proven in a randomized trial. A larger population and program data to confirm these results are therefore warranted.

Evidence-based wound classification for vulvar surgery: Implications for risk adjustment

OBJECTIVES

The correct wound classification for vulvar procedures (VP) is ambiguous according to current definitions, and infection rates are poorly described. We aimed to analyze rates of surgical site infection (SSI) in women who underwent VP to correctly categorize wound classification.

METHODS

Patients who underwent VP for dysplasia or carcinoma were collected from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (NSQIP). SSI rates of vulvar cases were compared to patients who underwent abdominal hysterectomy via laparotomy, stratified by the National Academy of Sciences wound classification. Descriptive analyses and trend tests of categorical variables were performed.

RESULTS

Between 2008 and 2016, 2116 and 31,506 patients underwent a VP or TAH, respectively. Among VP, 1345 (63.6%), 364 (17.2%), and 407 (19.2%) women underwent simple vulvectomy, radical vulvectomy, or radical vulvectomy with lymphadenectomy, respectively. The overall rate of SSI for VP was higher than that observed for TAH (5.6% vs. 3.8%; p < 0.0001). While patients undergoing TAH displayed a corresponding increase in the rate of SSI with wound type (type I: 3.4%; type II: 3.8%, type III: 6.8%; type IV 10.6%; p < 0.001), no such correlation was observed for simple VP (type I: 3.3%, type II: 3.0%; type III: 3.2%; type IV: 0%; p = 0.40). On the other hand, a non-significant correlation was observed for radical VP (type I: 4.0%, type II: 10.1%; type III: 14.3%; type IV: 20.0%; p = 0.08). The overall rate of SSI in patients undergoing any radical VP was similar to patients undergoing hysterectomy with a type IV wound (10.1% vs 10.6%, p = 0.87).

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing VP are at high risk of infection. Simple vulvectomy should be classified as a type II and radical vulvectomy as a type III wound. These recommendations are important for proper risk adjustment.

Peripartum Anesthesia Considerations for Placenta Accreta

Placenta accreta spectrum is becoming more common and is the most frequent indication for peripartum hysterectomy. Management of cesarean delivery in the setting of a morbidly adherent placenta has potential for massive hemorrhage, coagulopathies, and other morbidities. Anesthetic management of placenta accreta spectrum presents many challenges including optimizing surgical conditions, providing a safe and satisfying maternal delivery experience, preparing for massive hemorrhage and transfusion, preventing coagulopathies, and optimizing postoperative pain control. Balancing these challenging goals requires meticulous preparation with a thorough preoperative evaluation of the parturient and a well-coordinated multidisciplinary approach in order to optimize outcomes for the mother and fetus.

Guidelines for perioperative care in gynecologic/oncology: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations-2019 update

BACKGROUND

This is the first updated Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society guideline presenting a consensus for optimal perioperative care in gynecologic/oncology surgery.

METHODS

A database search of publications using Embase and PubMed was performed. Studies on each item within the ERAS gynecologic/oncology protocol were selected with emphasis on meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and large prospective cohort studies. These studies were then reviewed and graded according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system.

RESULTS

All recommendations on ERAS protocol items are based on best available evidence. The level of evidence for each item is presented accordingly.

CONCLUSIONS

The updated evidence base and recommendation for items within the ERAS gynecologic/oncology perioperative care pathway are presented by the ERAS® Society in this consensus review.