Anatomical measures as predictors of visual outcomes in ranibizumab-treated eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration

Morphologic parameters relevant for visual outcome during anti-angiogenic therapy of neovascular age-related macular degeneration

PURPOSE

To identify the effects of anti-angiogenic therapy in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in respect to morphologic type and time course and to identify prognostic factors for visual outcome on the basis of standardized optical coherence tomography (OCT) analysis.

DESIGN

Subanalysis of a prospective, 12-month, multicenter, phase IIIb trial (Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab in Patients with Subfoveal Choroidal Neovascularization Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration [EXCITE]).

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 353 treatment-naïve patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) receiving quarterly or monthly ranibizumab therapy.

METHODS

Patients were randomized to receive 0.3 mg quarterly, 0.5 mg quarterly, or 0.3 mg monthly doses of ranibizumab. Treatment comprised a loading phase of 3 consecutive monthly injections followed by a 9-month maintenance phase of monthly or quarterly injections. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was measured using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study protocol, and retinal morphology was assessed by Stratus OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA). Imaging data were evaluated by certified examiners of the Vienna Reading Center using a standardized protocol.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The BCVA was measured using ETDRS charts and retinal morphology was assessed by OCT.

RESULTS

During the loading phase, there was a significant correlation between a reduction in central retinal thickness and an increase in BCVA (P < 0.001), which decreased during the maintenance phase in all treatment arms. The proportion of patients showing retinal morphologic changes, such as intraretinal cysts (IRCs), subretinal fluid (SRF), and pigment epithelial detachments (PEDs), decreased significantly in all groups (P < 0.001), more intensively in the 0.5 mg quarterly than in both 0.3 mg groups. Intraretinal cysts resolved most rapidly followed by SRF, whereas PED decreased at a slower rate and intensity. Patients with IRC at baseline had lower BCVA levels that remained lower over the entire study period, whereas recurrence of IRC during follow-up showed no additional negative effect on function. Baseline SRF had no effect on visual recovery; however, recurrence of SRF during follow-up showed a tendency for an additional negative effect on function (P = 0.06). Baseline PED showed a negative influence on visual outcome only in combination with IRC and SRF.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a distinct response pattern and time course of morphologic parameters associated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in neovascular AMD. Specific alterations, such as IRC, SRF, and PED, as baseline or follow-up features are significantly influencing the potential for visual gain.

Retention of good visual acuity in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration and chronic refractory subfoveal subretinal fluid

PURPOSE

To describe the clinical characteristics of a subset of eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (NVAMD) receiving intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy which retain good visual acuity despite chronic, persistent subfoveal subretinal fluid (SRF).

DESIGN

Retrospective, observational case series.

METHODS

Study eyes were identified from a consecutive series of 186 patients treated with anti-VEGF therapy seen for regular follow-up over a 3-month period. The clinical histories of 10 eyes of 9 patients with NVAMD, chronic subfoveal SRF despite continuous anti-VEGF therapy, and good long-term visual acuity of 20/40 or greater were reviewed. Demographic factors, baseline and final visual acuity, neovascular lesion type, duration of persistent fluid, baseline and final subfoveal choroidal thickness, presence of geographic atrophy, and number of anti-VEGF injections were analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 78 years (range 55-91). The mean duration of persistent fluid was 5.2 years (range 1.3-11.0). Long-term visual acuities remained stable at 20/40 or better in all eyes. All eyes had type 1 (sub-retinal pigment epithelial) neovascularization. Average baseline subfoveal choroidal thickness was 285.3 μm and the average follow-up subfoveal choroidal thickness was 239.7 μm. No eyes had the presence of geographic atrophy. The mean number of injections was 36.5 (range 17-66).

CONCLUSION

Some eyes with type 1 neovascularization associated with chronic persistent subfoveal subretinal fluid despite continuous intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy may maintain good long-term visual outcomes. We hypothesize that type 1 neovascularization and greater subfoveal choroidal thickness may exert a protective effect on photoreceptor integrity. Further studies are necessary to assess long-term visual prognosis and predictive factors in patients with type 1 neovascularization leading to persistent subretinal fluid that is recalcitrant to anti-VEGF treatment.

Aflibercept treatment for patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration who were incomplete responders to multiple ranibizumab injections (TURF trial)

Aim

To determine the efficacy of 2.0 mg aflibercept in the management of patients with recalcitrant exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

Methods

In this prospective, open-label, single-arm clinical trial, patients were seen monthly and given mandatory 2.0 mg aflibercept at baseline, months 1, 2 and 4. Pro re nata (PRN) retreatment at months 3 and 5 was performed upon evidence of disease on spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). End point at month 6: mean change in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study best corrected visual acuity (ETDRS BCVA) and central subfield thickness (CST), mean number of aflibercept injections, percentage of PRN injections required, patients with no fluid on SD-OCT and patients losing >15 letters.

Results

At baseline, 46 patients with a mean of 42 prior antivascular endothelial growth factor-A (anti-VEGF) intravitreal treatments had a mean of 74.2 letters (Snellen equivalent 20/32) and mean CST of 347 µm. ETDRS letters remained stable throughout the trial; at month 6, mean BCVA change was +0.2 letters (range −10 to +13, p=0.71). Anatomically, mean CST improved significantly from baseline at each study visit including −23.6 µm at month 1 and −27.3 µm at month 6 (p=0.018). Seventy-one of 90 (79%) possible PRN injections were required and a mean of 5.6 aflibercept injections out of the maximum six were administered. Ten of 45 (22%) patients had no retinal fluid on SD-OCT at month 6. No patient lost >15 letters.

Conclusions

Aflibercept 2.0 mg treatment maintained mean visual acuity improvements previously achieved with high-dose 2.0-mg ranibizumab injections in recalcitrant wet AMD patients. Aflibercept 2.0 mg treatment led to significant anatomic improvement and was required monthly in most patients.

Clinical Trials Registration

FDA IND#12462. NCT 01543568.

Trial Details

IND 12462, NCT 01543568 http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01543568.

Time to clinically significant visual acuity gains after ranibizumab treatment for retinal vein occlusion: BRAVO and CRUISE trials

PURPOSE

To assess time to first achievement of clinically significant visual acuity (VA) gains from baseline in patients with retinal vein occlusion (RVO) receiving ranibizumab versus sham treatment.

DESIGN

Post hoc analyses of 2 phase 3 clinical trials assessing efficacy and safety of ranibizumab in patients with branch RVO (Ranibizumab for the Treatment of Macular Edema following Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety [BRAVO] study; NCT00061594) and central RVO (Ranibizumab for the Treatment of Macular Edema after Central Retinal Vein Occlusion Study: Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety [CRUISE]; NCT00056836) over 12 months.

PARTICIPANTS

Seven hundred eighty-nine patients (BRAVO, n = 397; CRUISE, n = 392).

INTERVENTION

Randomization to monthly intraocular ranibizumab injections (0.3 mg/0.5 mg) or sham. After 6 monthly injections (treatment period), patients meeting prespecified criteria received as-needed (pro re nata [PRN]) ranibizumab at their assigned dose (sham patients, ranibizumab 0.5 mg) through month 12 (observation period). BRAVO patients meeting specific eligibility criteria could receive rescue laser treatment once during the treatment and once during the observation periods.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Time to first gain of 15 letters or more from baseline, analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods. To evaluate the effect of delaying ranibizumab treatment, sham patients' VA data also were analyzed, with month 6 considered as baseline to assess vision gains during the 6 months of receiving ranibizumab PRN.

RESULTS

Median time to first 15-letter or more gain from baseline was 12.0 (sham), 4.8 (ranibizumab 0.3 mg), and 4.0 months (ranibizumab 0.5 mg) in BRAVO and 12.2, 5.9, and 5.2 months, respectively, in CRUISE. The cumulative proportion of patients who had ever gained 15 letters or more from baseline by month 12 was 50% (sham), 68% (ranibizumab 0.3 mg), and 71% (ranibizumab 0.5 mg) in BRAVO and 42%, 61%, and 66%, respectively, in CRUISE. After 6 months of ranibizumab PRN treatment, a cumulative 10.8% (BRAVO) and 26.2% (CRUISE) of initially sham-treated patients ever gained 15 letters or more.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective analysis shows that more than 50% of patients treated with monthly ranibizumab achieved clinically significant vision gains during the initial 6 months of treatment, which largely were maintained using PRN treatment to 12 months. In comparison, less than 50% of patients initially randomized to sham (and later receiving ranibizumab 0.5 mg PRN treatment) ever achieved clinically significant vision gains. These results suggest that initiating treatment immediately after diagnosis may provide the greatest vision gains. The potential benefits of early treatment should be evaluated further in prospective clinical studies.

Comparison of outcomes from a phase 3 study of age-related macular degeneration with a matched, observational cohort

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes of intravitreal therapy from an observational study cohort with those of participants receiving treatment in the Minimally Classic/Occult Trial of the Anti-VEGF Antibody Ranibizumab (MARINA) for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (wet AMD).

DESIGN

Database observational study. Participants in the observational cohort were chosen to match demographic features and entry criteria of the treatment group from MARINA. Outcomes over 12 months were compared.

PARTICIPANTS

Eight hundred twenty-one anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF)-naïve eyes treated with ranibizumab with 12 months or more of follow-up were included in the total Fight Retinal Blindness! (FRB-All) cohort, whereas a subset of this cohort of 401 eyes who were matched to the MARINA treatment group were included as the FRB-MARINA cohort.

INTERVENTION

Intravitreal ranibizumab therapy of 0.5 mg for wet AMD.

METHODS

Visual acuity (VA) in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) letters and treatments given were recorded continuously and anonymously in an electronic database for 12 months. Locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (LOESS) regression was used to plot change in visual acuity data over the course of 12 months for both the FRB-All cohort and the FRB-MARINA cohort, whereas results from the MARINA trial were taken from the published study report.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Change in VA in logMAR letters over 12 months, treatment, and visit intensity.

RESULTS

Mean visual acuity improvement after 12 months in FRB-MARINA (+5.5 letters) was similar to that of the 0.5-mg group from MARINA (+7.2 letters). Improvement in FRB-ALL was slightly less (+4.9 letters). Mean treatment effect compared with the MARINA control group was similar for the MARINA treated group (+17.6 letters) and the FRB-MARINA cohort (+15.9 letters). A mean of 7.3 injections in 12 months was received by the observational cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Similarity of mean VA improvement in the matched observational cohort with that of the phase 3 clinical trial suggests that these results can be achieved in real-world clinical practice with a modified treatment regimen.