Effects of smoking on patients with chronic pain: a propensity-weighted analysis on the Collaborative Health Outcomes Information Registry

[Relation between tobacco smoking and pain: A narrative review of the scientific literature]

INTRODUCTION

Tobacco smoking and pain have an intimate, complex, two-way interaction. The purpose of this narrative review of the literature is to present what is currently understood about the relationship.

STATE OF KNOWLEDGE

Tobacco smoking (and the associated chronic exposure to nicotine) has been defined as a risk factor for chronic pain, involving nociceptive sensitisation. For people who smoke, pain will be both a motivational factor for tobacco consumption and a barrier to tobacco use cessation. Conversely, nicotine (acute exposure) has clearly demonstrated analgesic properties, mediated in particular by activation of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.

PERSPECTIVES

The management of pain in people who smoke is still largely unaddressed, and further studies will be needed to develop effective strategies for tobacco use cessation in this context. Nicotine and modulators of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors represent innovative strategies for the discovery of new analgesics.

CONCLUSIONS

The effects of smoking on pain, chronic nociceptive sensitisation and acute analgesia, serve to maintain tobacco consumption via negative reinforcement. A holistic therapeutic strategy is necessary to maximise the likelihood of successful smoking cessation.

Development and validation of the Collaborative Health Outcomes Information Registry body map

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.

Introduction:

Critical for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic pain is the anatomical distribution of pain. Several body maps allow patients to indicate pain areas on paper; however, each has its limitations.

Objectives:

To provide a comprehensive body map that can be universally applied across pain conditions, we developed the electronic Collaborative Health Outcomes Information Registry (CHOIR) self-report body map by performing an environmental scan and assessing existing body maps.

Methods:

After initial validation using a Delphi technique, we compared (1) pain location questionnaire responses of 530 participants with chronic pain with (2) their pain endorsements on the CHOIR body map (CBM) graphic. A subset of participants (n = 278) repeated the survey 1 week later to assess test–retest reliability. Finally, we interviewed a patient cohort from a tertiary pain management clinic (n = 28) to identify reasons for endorsement discordances.

Results:

The intraclass correlation coefficient between the total number of body areas endorsed on the survey and those from the body map was 0.86 and improved to 0.93 at follow-up. The intraclass correlation coefficient of the 2 body map graphics separated by 1 week was 0.93. Further examination demonstrated high consistency between the questionnaire and CBM graphic (<10% discordance) in most body areas except for the back and shoulders (≈15–19% discordance). Participants attributed inconsistencies to misinterpretation of body regions and laterality, the latter of which was addressed by modifying the instructions.

Conclusions:

Our data suggest that the CBM is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing the distribution of pain.

Physical comorbidities in private psychiatric inpatients: Prevalence and its association with quality of life and functional impairment

The aim of this study was to examine the association between physical health conditions and quality of life and functioning in private psychiatric inpatients. We sought to determine whether quality of life and functioning was poorer in individuals with physical comorbidity compared to those without. A quantitative correlational descriptive design was utilized. Seventy patients were included in sequential order within a week of admission to hospital. Participants completed the SF-36 survey, and the corresponding hospital records were audited. The STROBE guidelines were followed in the reporting of this research. The study found that 64.3% (45/70) of participants had one or more comorbid physical health conditions, primarily cardiovascular, respiratory, musculoskeletal, endocrine and medically unexplained conditions or syndromes. Chronic pain was experienced by 40% (28/70) of participants, and 47.6% (33/70) were found to be overweight or obese. Tobacco smoking and obesity were risk factors associated with physical comorbidity (P = 0.02 and P < 0.001, respectively). Quality of life and functioning were poorer in those with physical health conditions, particularly in the SF-36 domains of bodily pain, physical functioning and general health (P < 0.001, P = 0.003 and P = 0.005, respectively). Physical health conditions were largely prevalent, and quality of life and functioning were poorer in those with physical comorbidities. The implementation of clinical guidelines for the monitoring of physical health has been proposed as well as a dedicated physical health nursing role. Continuation of integrative programmes focusing on both physical and mental health may also benefit patients in this setting.

Are health conditions and concerns about health effects of smoking predictive of quitting? Findings from the ITC 4CV Survey ( 2016-2018 )

INTRODUCTION

Limited research has investigated the relationship between multiple health conditions and subsequent quitting activities at the population level. This study examines whether nine health conditions and concerns related to smoking are predictive of quit attempts and success among those who tried.

METHODS

Data came from the International Tobacco Control Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey conducted in Australia, Canada, England and the US. A total of 3998 daily smokers were surveyed in 2016 and recontacted in 2018. Respondents were asked in 2016 whether they had a medical diagnosis for depression, anxiety, alcohol problems, obesity, chronic pain, diabetes, heart disease, cancer, and chronic lung disease, and whether they had concerns about past/future health effects of smoking. Outcomes were quit attempts and success (having been abstinent for at least one month between surveys).

RESULTS

Across all four countries, 44.4% of smokers tried to quit between the two survey years, and of these 36.8% were successful. Concerns about past (adjusted odds ratio, AOR=1.66, 95% CI: 1.32–2.08, p<0.001) and future effects of smoking (AOR=2.17, 95% CI: 1.62–2.91, p<0.001) and most health conditions predicted quit attempts, but were mostly unrelated to quit success, with concerns about future effects (AOR=0.59, 95% CI: 0.35–0.99, p<0.05), chronic lung conditions (AOR=0.56, 95% CI: 0.37–0.86, p<0.01) and chronic pain (with a trend) being associated with lower success.

CONCLUSIONS

Having a major chronic health condition does, generally, motivate making quit attempts, but in some cases it is associated with failure among those who try. More effective cessation support is required for these high priority groups.

Nicotine dependence and the International Association for the Study of Pain neuropathic pain grade in patients with chronic low back pain and radicular pain: is there an association?

Background

This study investigated whether current smoking and a higher nicotine dependency were associated with chronic low back pain (LBP), lumbar related leg pain (sciatica) and/or radicular neuropathic pain.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted on 150 patients (mean age, 60.1 ± 13.1 yr). Demographic data, the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) neuropathic pain grade, STarT Back tool, and the Fagerström test were completed. A control group (n = 50) was recruited.

Results

There was a significant difference between current smokers and non-smokers in the chronic LBP group in the mean pain score (P = 0.025), total STarT Back score (P = 0.015), worst pain location (P = 0.020), most distal pain radiation (P = 0.042), and in the IASP neuropathic pain grade (P = 0.026). There was a significant difference in the mean Fagerström score between the four IASP neuropathic pain grades (P = 0.005). Current smoking yielded an odds ratio (OR) of 3.071 (P = 0.011) for developing chronic LBP and sciatica, and an OR of 4.028 (P = 0.002) for obtaining an IASP “definite/probable” neuropathic pain grade, for both cohorts. The likelihood for chronic LBP and sciatica increased by 40.9% (P = 0.007), while the likelihood for an IASP neuropathic grade of “definite/probable” increased by 50.8% (P = 0.002), for both cohorts, for every one unit increase in the Fagerström score.

Conclusions

A current smoking status and higher nicotine dependence increase the odds for chronic LBP, sciatica and radicular neuropathic pain.

Surgery for lower extremity symptomatic neuroma: Long-term outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Traumatic neuroma caused by injuries or surgery can result in neuropathic pain, functional impairment, and psychological distress, which has an impact on quality of life. The aim of this study was to identify the factors related to successful treatment of symptomatic lower extremity symptomatic neuromas using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

METHODS

Thirty-two patients with 48 symptomatic neuromas completed the PROMIS mobility, PROMIS pain interference (PI), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain (0-10) for both pre- and post-operative pain, and the PROMIS depression at a mean of 8.9±4.5 years following neuroma surgery. Neuromas were located around the foot and ankle (n=18, 38%), leg (n=14, 29%), around the knee (n=13, 27%), and in the thigh (n=3, 6.3%). Surgical treatment included neuroma excision and implantation (n=29, 60%) followed by neuroma excision alone or excision with placement in the subcutaneous tissue (n=12, 25%). We performed multivariable analysis to identify the factors influencing the PROMs.

RESULTS

Patients reported significant reduction in mean NRS pain after surgery (7.3 vs 4.9, p=0.0013). Higher PROMIS depression scores were independently associated with inferior PROMIS mobility scores (β=-0.38, p=0.001), higher PROMIS PI scores (β=0.68, p<0.001), and higher NRS pain scores (β=0.1, p=0.001). Additionally, smoking was independently associated with higher NRS pain scores (β=1.59, p=0.049) CONCLUSION: Surgical treatment of symptomatic neuromas of the lower extremity provides a long-term improvement in 59% of patients, but 19% of patients still reported severe persistent pain despite surgical treatment. Smoking and negative mood have negative effects on patient-reported outcomes after neuroma surgery.

The association between smokers' self-reported health problems and quitting: Findings from the ITC Four Country Smoking and Vaping Wave 1 Survey

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to systematically examine whether having health conditions or concerns related to smoking are associated with quitting activities among smokers across four western countries.

METHODS

Data came from the 2016 International Tobacco Control Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey conducted in Australia, Canada, England and US. We asked smokers and recent quitters (n=11838) whether they had a medical diagnosis for heart disease, cancer, chronic lung disease, depression, anxiety, alcohol problems, diabetes, severe obesity and chronic pain (nine conditions), and whether they believed smoking had harmed/would harm their health, along with questions on quitting activities.

RESULTS

General concerns about smoking harming health and all specific health conditions, except for alcohol problems, were positively associated with quit attempts, but the relationships between health conditions and other quitting measures (being abstinent, planning to quit, use of quitting medications) were less consistent. Positive associations between conditions and use of quitting medications were only significant for depression, anxiety and chronic pain (adjusted odds ratios ranged from 1.4 to 1.5). There was a general tendency to report lower self-efficacy for quitting among those with the health conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

While those with smoking related conditions are somewhat more aware of the links to their smoking, and are largely taking more action, the extent of this is lower than one might reasonably expect. Enhanced awareness campaigns are needed and health professionals need to do more to use health conditions to motivate quit attempts and to ensure they are made with the most effective forms of help.