The mammalian transcriptional repressor RBP (CBF1) targets TFIID and TFIIA to prevent activated transcription

A single point mutation in TFIIA suppresses NC2 requirement in vivo

Negative cofactor 2 (NC2) is a dimeric histone-fold complex that represses RNA polymerase II transcription through binding to TATA-box-binding protein (TBP) and inhibition of the general transcription factors TFIIA and TFIIB. Here we study molecular mechanisms of repression by human NC2 in vivo in yeast. Yeast NC2 genes are essential and can be exchanged with human NC2. The physiologically relevant regions of NC2 have been determined and shown to match the histone-fold dimerization motif. A suppressor screen based upon limiting concentrations of NC2beta yielded a cold-sensitive mutant in the yeast TFIIA subunit Toa1. The single point mutation in Toa1 alleviates the requirement for both subunits of NC2. Biochemical characterization indicated that mutant (mt)-Toa1 dimerizes well with Toa2; it supports specific recognition of the TATA box by TBP but forms less stable TBP-TFIIA-DNA complexes. Wild-type but not the mt-Toa1 can relieve NC2 effects in purified transcription systems. These data provide evidence for a dimeric NC2 complex that is in an equilibrium with TFIIA after the initial binding of TBP to promoter TATA boxes.

A testis-specific transcription factor IIA (TFIIAtau) stimulates TATA-binding protein-DNA binding and transcription activation

The general transcription factor IIA (TFIIA) stimulates RNA polymerase II-specific transcription by stabilizing the association of the TATA-binding protein (TBP) with promoter DNA, inhibiting repressors of TBP, and facilitating activator-dependent conformational changes in the preinitiation complex. TFIIA is encoded by two genes (alphabeta and gamma) that are highly conserved between human and yeast. Here, we report the molecular cloning of a novel human gene that shares significant sequence similarity to the evolutionarily conserved amino- and carboxyl-terminal domains of TFIIAalphabeta. The TFIIA-related protein (TFIIAtau) was cloned from a testis-specific cDNA library, and its mRNA is expressed predominantly in testis tissue as determined by expressed sequence tag data base analysis and Northern blotting analysis. The TFIIA complex reconstituted with the testis-specific subunit, TFIIA (tau+gamma), formed the TFIIA-TBP-TATA DNA (T-A) and TFIIA-TFIIB-TBP-TATA DNA (TAB) complexes indistinguishably from TFIIA (alphabeta+gamma). TFIIA (tau+gamma) supported basal and activated transcription for most activators in reactions reconstituted with TFIIA-depleted nuclear extracts. However, TFIIA (tau+gamma) was reduced relative to TFIIA (alphabeta+gamma) for stimulating transcription with at least one activator, suggesting that these two forms of TFIIA have activator specificity. These results suggest that TFIIAtau may be important for testis-specific transcription regulation.

Alleviation of human papillomavirus E2-mediated transcriptional repression via formation of a TATA binding protein (or TFIID)-TFIIB-RNA polymerase II-TFIIF preinitiation complex

Transcription in human papillomaviruses (HPVs) is mainly regulated by cellular transcription factors and virus-encoded E2 proteins that act as sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins. Although the functions of E2 as a transcriptional activator and a repressor have been well documented, the role of cellular factors involved in E2-mediated regulation of the HPV promoters and the mechanism by which E2 modulates viral gene expression remain unclear. Using reconstituted cell-free transcription systems, we found that cellular enhancer-binding factors and general cofactors, such as TAF(II)s, TFIIA, Mediator, and PC4, are not required for E2-mediated repression. Unlike other transcriptional repressors that function through recruitment of histone deacetylase or corepressor complexes, HPV E2 is able to directly target components of the general transcription machinery to exert its repressor activity on the natural HPV E6 promoter. Interestingly, preincubation of TATA binding protein (TBP) or TFIID with HPV template is not sufficient to overcome E2-mediated repression, which can be alleviated only via formation of a minimal TBP (or TFIID)-TFIIB-RNA polymerase II-TFIIF preinitiation complex. Our data therefore indicate that E2 does not simply work by displacing TBP or TFIID from binding to the adjacent TATA box. Instead, E2 appears to function as an active repressor that directly inhibits HPV transcription at steps after TATA recognition by TBP or TFIID.

Neural restrictive silencer factor recruits mSin3 and histone deacetylase complex to repress neuron-specific target genes

Accumulative evidence suggests that more than 20 neuron-specific genes are regulated by a transcriptional cis-regulatory element known as the neural restrictive silencer (NRS). A trans-acting repressor that binds the NRS, NRSF [also designated RE1-silencing transcription factor (REST)] has been cloned, but the mechanism by which it represses transcription is unknown. Here we show evidence that NRSF represses transcription of its target genes by recruiting mSin3 and histone deacetylase. Transfection experiments using a series of NRSF deletion constructs revealed the presence of two repression domains, RD-1 and RD-2, within the N- and C-terminal regions, respectively. A yeast two-hybrid screen using the RD-1 region as a bait identified a short form of mSin3B. In vitro pull-down assays and in vivo immunoprecipitation-Western analyses revealed a specific interaction between NRSF-RD1 and mSin3 PAH1-PAH2 domains. Furthermore, NRSF and mSin3 formed a complex with histone deacetylase 1, suggesting that NRSF-mediated repression involves histone deacetylation. When the deacetylation of histones was inhibited by tricostatin A in non-neuronal cells, mRNAs encoding several neuronal-specific genes such as SCG10, NMDAR1, and choline acetyltransferase became detectable. These results indicate that NRSF recruits mSin3 and histone deacetylase 1 to silence neural-specific genes and suggest further that repression of histone deacetylation is crucial for transcriptional activation of neural-specific genes during neuronal terminal differentiation.

Genetic dissection of hTAF(II)130 defines a hydrophobic surface required for interaction with glutamine-rich activators

The general transcription factor TFIID is a multiprotein complex consisting of the TATA box-binding protein and multiple TATA box-binding protein-associated factors (TAF(II)s). The central domain of human TAF(II)130 contains four glutamine-rich regions Q1-Q4 that interact with transcriptional activators such as Sp1 and CREB and mediate activation. We screened in yeast random point mutations introduced into Q1-Q4 against the Sp1 activation domain and obtained a distinct set of hTAF(II)130s with alterations in TAF(II)-activator interaction. Here we characterize functionally an hTAF(II)130 mutant containing a phenylalanine to serine change at position 311 (F311S) that is compromised in its ability to associate with Sp1B and CREB-N activation domains. Substitution of phenylalanine with tyrosine but not with isoleucine or tryptophan also reduced hTAF(II)130 interaction, suggesting that the hydrophobic character rather than the specific amino acid at this position is a key determinant of interaction. Deletion of nine amino acids (Delta9) surrounding Phe(311) abolished the interaction of hTAF(II)130 with Sp1. Overexpression of hTAF(II)130Q1/Q2 and Q1-Q4 strongly inhibited Sp1-dependent transcriptional enhancement in transient transfection assays, whereas expression of either F311S or Delta9 only partially suppressed Sp1-mediated activation. Thus, a short hydrophobic sequence motif encompassing Phe(311) in hTAF(II)130 represents a critical surface with which Sp1B interacts to activate transcription.

Complex Complexes: Report of an NIDDK Workshop on Coactivators and Corepressors, Bethesda, USA, 15-16 December 1998

Exciting new observations about receptor-interacting and nuclear accessory proteins and their ability to regulate gene expression have provided insight into hormonal regulation of gene expression. The goal of a recent NIDDK workshop was to discuss how diverse signaling pathways could converge on target genes and provide regulatory input to either activate or repress transcription.

Isolation of mouse TFIID and functional characterization of TBP and TFIID in mediating estrogen receptor and chromatin transcription

TFIID is a general transcription factor required for the assembly of the transcription machinery on most eukaryotic promoters transcribed by RNA polymerase II. Although the TATA-binding subunit (TBP) of TFIID is able to support core promoter and activator-dependent transcription under some circumstances, the roles of TBP-associated factors (TAF(II)s) in TFIID-mediated activation remain unclear. To define the evolutionarily conserved function of TFIID and to elucidate the roles of TAF(II)s in gene activation, we have cloned the mouse TAF(II)55 subunit of TFIID and further isolated mouse TFIID from a murine FM3A-derived cell line that constitutively expresses FLAG-tagged mouse TAF(II)55. Both mouse and human TFIIDs are capable of mediating transcriptional activation by Gal4 fusions containing different activation domains in a highly purified human cell-free transcription system devoid of TFIIA and Mediator. Although TAF(II)-independent activation by Gal4-VP16 can also be observed in this highly purified human transcription system with either mouse or yeast TBP, TAF(II)s are strictly required for estrogen receptor-mediated activation independently of the core promoter sequence. In addition, TAF(II)s are necessary for transcription from a preassembled chromatin template. These findings clearly demonstrate an essential role of TAF(II)s as a transcriptional coactivator for estrogen receptor and in chromatin transcription.

Interaction of the nuclear protein CBF1 with the kappaB site of the IL-6 gene promoter

The nuclear protein CBF1 has been shown to function as an intermediate to target transcription factors,such as the activated Notch receptor,to specific DNA sites. In this paper,we show that CBF1 from cell lines of different origin is able to bind to the[kappa]B site of the IL-6 promoter. By transfection analyses performed in HeLa cells,we demonstrate that overexpressed CBF1 acts as a negative regulator of IL-6 gene transcription and is unable to elicit Notch-dependent activation of this gene. Analyses of protein-DNA interactions indicate that the topology of the complex formed by CBF1 and the target DNA is subtly affected by sequencessurrounding the recognition site. Furthermore,we show that CBF1 induces DNA bending. This finding suggests that CBF1 may influence IL-6 gene transcription by determining a specific conformation of the promoter region.

DNA bending and wrapping around RNA polymerase: a "revolutionary" model describing transcriptional mechanisms

A model is proposed in which bending and wrapping of DNA around RNA polymerase causes untwisting of the DNA helix at the RNA polymerase catalytic center to stimulate strand separation prior to initiation. During elongation, DNA bending through the RNA polymerase active site is proposed to lower the energetic barrier to the advance of the transcription bubble. Recent experiments with mammalian RNA polymerase II along with accumulating evidence from studies of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase indicate the importance of DNA bending and wrapping in transcriptional mechanisms. The DNA-wrapping model describes specific roles for general RNA polymerase II transcription factors (TATA-binding protein [TBP], TFIIB, TFIIF, TFIIE, and TFIIH), provides a plausible explanation for preinitiation complex isomerization, suggests mechanisms underlying the synergy between transcriptional activators, and suggests an unforseen role for TBP-associating factors in transcription.

Transcriptional repression by the zinc finger protein REST is mediated by titratable nuclear factors

The zinc finger protein REST (RE-1 silencing transcription factor) is a transcriptional repressor that inhibits neuronal gene transcription in non-neuronal tissues. REST may represent a master regulator of neuronal gene expression. REST contains two repressor domains located at the N- and C-termini of the molecule. To investigate the molecular mechanism of transcriptional repression by REST, in vivo competition experiments were performed. Both repression domains were expressed in the nucleus as fusion proteins with S. japonicum glutathione S-transferase (GST). The ability of these fusion proteins to block transcriptional repression mediated by the repressor domains of REST was tested. The results show that transcriptional repression by the N-terminal repression domain of REST could be overcome by expression of a GST fusion protein encoding the N-terminal, but not C-terminal repression domain, and vice versa, suggesting that both repression domains have to interact with distinct nuclear factors to exhibit biological activity. The GST-REST fusion proteins had no effect upon transcriptional repression mediated by the KRAB (Krüppel-associated box) domain, a strong mammalian repressor domain, or the repressor domain derived from the thyroid hormone receptors alpha. We conclude that REST has to interact with at least two distinct nuclear factors to inhibit transcription. These factors are distinct from the mammalian corepressor proteins KAP-1/KRIP-1 and N-CoR that mediate repression by the KRAB domain or the thyroid hormone receptor alpha. Thus, mammalian transcriptional repressors utilize different mechanisms to inhibit transcription by using different kinds of protein-protein interactions.

Transcriptional coregulators in development

Small differences in the levels of an extracellular signaling molecule can specify cell fate during development. Threshold responses are often determined at the level of transcription. Cell-specific and spatially localized patterns of gene expression depend on combinations of sequence-specific activators and repressors that bind to extensive cis-regulatory regions. Different mechanisms for integrating this complex regulatory information are discussed, particularly the role of coregulatory proteins, which are recruited to the DNA template by sequence-specific transcription factors. Recent studies suggest that a growing set of coactivators and corepressors mediate communication between diverse upstream regulatory proteins and the core RNA polymerase II transcription complex.

Mechanism of transcriptional repression of E2F by the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein

The retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein (pRB) is a transcriptional repressor, critical for normal cell cycle progression. We have undertaken studies using a highly purified reconstituted in vitro transcription system to demonstrate how pRB can repress transcriptional activation mediated by the E2F transcription factor. Remarkably, E2F activation became resistant to pRB-mediated repression after the establishment of a partial (TFIIA/TFIID) preinitiation complex (PIC). DNase I footprinting studies suggest that E2F recruits TFIID to the promoter in a step that also requires TFIIA and confirm that recruitment of the PIC by E2F is blocked by pRB. These studies suggest a detailed mechanism by which E2F activates and pRB represses transcription without the requirement of histone-modifying enzymes.

Transcription reinitiation rate: a potential role for TATA box stabilization of the TFIID:TFIIA:DNA complex

Potential pathways that could account for observed rapid rates of transcription reinitiation were explored. A nuclear extract system was established in which reinitiation rates were observed to be kinetically facilitated and in which the rate was sensitive to TATA box mutation. Kinetic facilitation of functional complex formation could be mimicked by pre-assembling activator and certain general transcription factors on the promoter and then adding nuclear extract. The minimal activated complex with this characteristic contained general factors TFIID and TFIIA. The ability of the TFIID:TFIIA complex to complete assembly rapidly was reduced by the same TATA box mutation that reduced reinitiation rate. Band shift experiments also showed that this same mutation lowered the stability of the TBP:TFIIA complex on the DNA. The results suggest that TATA-dependent variations in retention of the TFIID:TFIIA complex after release of the polymerase could be a primary determinant of reinitiation rate, allowing diversity in promoter strength to be related to diversity in TATA element sequences.

CIR, a corepressor linking the DNA binding factor CBF1 to the histone deacetylase complex

CBF1 is a member of the CSL family of DNA binding factors, which mediate either transcriptional repression or transcriptional activation. CSL proteins play a central role in Notch signaling and in Epstein-Barr virus-induced immortalization. Notch is a transmembrane protein involved in cell-fate decisions, and the cytoplasmic domain of Notch (NotchIC) targets CBF1. The Epstein-Barr virus-immortalizing protein EBNA2 activates both cellular and viral gene expression by targeting CBF1 and mimicking NotchIC. We have examined the mechanism of CBF1-mediated repression and show that CBF1 binds to a unique corepressor, CBF1 interacting corepressor (CIR). A CIR homolog is encoded by Caenorhabditis elegans, indicating that CIR is evolutionarily conserved. Two CBF1 mutants that were unable to bind CIR did not function as repressors, suggesting that targeting of CIR to CBF1 is an important component of repression. When expressed as a Gal4 fusion protein, CIR repressed reporter gene expression. CIR binds to histone deacetylase and to SAP30 and serves as a linker between CBF1 and the histone deacetylase complex.

Roles of the ankyrin repeats and C-terminal region of the mouse notch1 intracellular region

The Notch intracellular region (RAMIC) interacts with a DNA binding protein RBP-J to activate transcription of genes that inhibit cell differentiation. The RAM domain and ankyrin (ANK) repeats of mouse Notch1 RAMIC were shown to be responsible for RBP-J binding and necessary for transactivation. The C-terminal portion of Notch1 RAMIC has also been suggested to be important for transactivation. Using GAL4 fusion constructs, we identified a novel transactivation domain (TAD) between the ANK repeats and the PEST sequence of mouse Notch1. The C-terminal half of mouse Notch2 RAMIC also exhibited TAD activity. Unexpectedly, the RBP-J chimeric protein with the Notch1 TAD failed to activate transcription but the activity was recovered by addition of either the RAM domain or ANK repeats. The results suggest that the activity of Notch1 TAD is repressed by fusion with RBP-J because of the presence of a RBP-J-associated co-repressor(s), which could be displaced by either the RAM domain or ANK repeats. Taken together, mouse Notch1 RAMIC can experimentally be separated into three functional domains: the RAM domain and ANK repeats for RBP-J binding and co-repressor displacement and the C-terminal TAD.

NAT, a human complex containing Srb polypeptides that functions as a negative regulator of activated transcription

A complex that represses activated transcription and contains the human homologs of the yeast Srb7, Srb10, Srb11, Rgr1, and Med6 proteins was isolated. The complex is devoid of the Srb polypeptides previously shown to be components of the yeast Mediator complex that functions in transcriptional activation. The complex phosphorylates the CTD of RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) at residues other than those phosphorylated by the kinase of TFIIH. Moreover, the complex specifically interacts with RNAPII. The interaction is not mediated by the CTD of RNAPII, but is precluded by phosphorylation of the CTD. Our results indicate that the complex is a subcomplex of the human RNAPII holoenzyme. We suggest that the RNAPII holoenzyme is a transcriptional control panel, integrating and responding to specific signals to activate or repress transcription.