Cooperative formation of chiral patterns during growth of bacterial colonies

Cooperative organization of bacterial colonies: from genotype to morphotype

In nature, bacteria must often cope with difficult environmental conditions. To do so they have developed sophisticated cooperative behavior and intricate communication pathways. Utilizing these elements, motile microbial colonies frequently develop complex patterns in response to adverse growth conditions on hard surfaces under conditions of energy limitation. We employ the term morphotype to refer to specific properties of colonial development. The morphologies we discuss include a tip-splitting (T) morphotype, chiral (C) morphotype, and vortex (V) morphotype. A generic modeling approach was developed by combining a detailed study of the cellular behavior and dynamics during colonial development and invoking concepts derived from the study of pattern formation in nonliving systems. Analysis of patterning behavior of the models suggests bacterial processes whereby communication leads to self-organization by using cooperative cellular interactions. New features emerging from the model include various models of cell-cell signaling, such as long-range chemorepulsion, short-range chemoattraction, and, in the case of the V morphotype, rotational chemotaxis. In this regard, pattern formation in microorganisms can be viewed as the result of the exchange of information between the micro-level (the individual cells) and the macro-level (the colony).

Classification and genetic characterization of pattern-forming Bacilli

One of the more natural but less commonly studied forms of colonial bacterial growth is pattern formation. This type of growth is characterized by bacterial populations behaving in an organized manner to generate readily identifiable geometric and predictable morphologies on solid and semi-solid surfaces. In our first attempt to study the molecular basis of pattern formation in Bacillus subtilis, we stumbled upon an enigma: some strains used to describe pattern formation in B. subtilis did not have the phenotypic or genotypic characteristics of B. subtilis. In this report, we show that these strains are actually not B. subtilis, but belong to a different class of Bacilli, group I. We show further that commonly used laboratory strains of B. subtilis can co-exist as mixed cultures with group I Bacilli, and that the latter go unnoticed when grown on frequently used laboratory substrates. However, when B. subtilis is grown under more stringent semiarid conditions, members of group I emerge in the form of complex patterns. When B. subtilis is grown under less stringent and more motile conditions, B. subtilis forms its own pattern, and members of group I remain unnoticed. These findings have led us to revise some of the mechanistic and evolutionary hypotheses that have been proposed to explain pattern growth in Bacilli.