Important surgical measures and techniques at cesarean hysterectomy for placenta previa accreta

Abnormal placentation

The term "morbidly adherent placenta" has recently been introduced to describe the spectrum of disorders including placenta accreta, increta and percreta. Due to excessive invasion of the placenta into the uterus there is associated significant maternal morbidity and mortality. Most significant risk factors for morbidly adherent placenta include history of prior cesarean delivery as well as placenta previa in the current pregnancy. Ultrasound remains the gold standard for antenatal diagnosis, however, in recent years MRI has assisted in identifying complex parametrial involvement. Optimizing maternal and neonatal outcomes involves early prenatal diagnosis, a multi-disciplinary team-based approach, and referral to an experienced center.

Laterally-positioned placenta in placenta previa

Objectives: To clarify perinatal outcomes of patients with placenta previa (PP) with the placenta mainly positioned in the lateral uterine wall (lateral PP), thereby clinically characterizing this condition.Study design: The retrospective cohort study was performed involving patients with lateral PP between January 2006 and December 2016. The placental position was determined and classified by magnetic resonance imaging.Results: This study included 98 patients with PP, which was classified into three types according to the main placental position sites: lateral (n = 30), anterior (n = 32), and posterior (n = 36) PP. Overall, the median blood loss at cesarean section (CS) was 1808 mL and transfusion was performed for 78 patients (80%). Univariate analysis showed that patients with lateral PP bled less at CS than those with non-lateral PP (anterior + posterior PP) [median 1510 (interquartile range 1080-2168) versus 1975 (1570-2860) mL: p=.02]. The other parameters including rates of conception by assisted reproductive technology, prior CS, antepartum bleeding, and placenta accreta spectrum did not show the significances. Among the three groups of PP (lateral versus anterior versus posterior), patients with lateral PP bled less than those with anterior (p=.05) or posterior (p=.13) PP, but this was nonsignificant [lateral 1510 (1080-2168) versus anterior 2145 (1580-3348) versus posterior 1808 (1533-2555) mL]. When dividing into lateral PP to two types: placenta showing anterior dominancy versus posterior dominancy, patients with lateral PP and anterior dominancy bled more those with posterior dominancy [2430 (1410-3400) versus 1170 (1050-1588) mL: p=.002].Conclusion: Patients with lateral PP bled significantly less than those with non-lateral (anterior or posterior) PP. Patients with lateral PP and anterior dominancy bled more than those with posterior dominancy.

Effect of site of placentation on pregnancy outcomes in patients with placenta previa

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to evaluate the site of placentation on the pregnancy outcomes of patients with placenta previa.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 678 cases of placenta previa. Basic information and pregnancy outcome data were collected. Differences between the different placenta previa positions and pregnancy outcomes were compared using the chi-square and independent t tests. Logistic and multiple regression analyses were used to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) to determine the risk factors for PAS disorders and postpartum hemorrhage and evaluate the effect of placental attachment site on pregnancy outcomes.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the PAS disorders rate and the incidence of complete placenta previa depending on the type of placentation; however, placental attachment site influenced the pregnancy outcome. Placental attachment to the anterior wall was associated with shorter gestational age, low birth weight, lower Apgar score, higher prenatal bleeding rate, increased postpartum hemorrhage, longer duration of hospitalization, and higher blood transfusion and hysterectomy rates compared to cases with lateral/posterior wall placenta. Placental attachment at the incision site of a previous cesarean section significantly increased the incidence of complete placenta previa and PAS disorders compared with placental attachment at a site without incision, but did not significantly influence pregnancy outcomes. Placental attachment to the anterior wall was an independent risk factor for postpartum hemorrhage in patients with placenta previa. Placental attachment to a previous incision site was an independent risk factor for PAS disorders.

CONCLUSION

The site of placental attachment in patients with placenta previa has an important influence on the pregnancy outcome. When the placenta is located on the anterior wall, clinicians should pay attention to the adverse pregnancy outcomes and the possibility of massive postpartum hemorrhage. In cases of placental attachment to the uterine incision site, physicians should be highly vigilant regarding the occurrence of PAS disorders.

Conservative management of placenta percreta

BACKGROUND

Maternal outcomes after conservative management of placenta percreta are poorly understood.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the success and complication rates of conservative management of placenta percreta.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The PubMed, MEDLINE, and Scopus databases were searched for English-language articles published between January 1990 and December 2016, using combinations of search terms related to conservative management of placenta percreta.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Only studies describing conservative treatment for placenta percreta (without placental removal) were included in the systematic review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

There were 44 studies included and maternal outcomes were reviewed and categorized among 72 patients.

MAIN RESULTS

The uterus was preserved among 42 (58%) patients and severe complications developed among 40 (56%). Prophylactic uterine artery embolization (UAE) did not improve success rates (P=0.807); however, the mean time for complete placental resorption was lower in the UAE group than in the non-UAE group (22.4 weeks vs 35.3 weeks; P=0.014). Hysterectomy was performed at a mean of 44.6 days after cesarean delivery. Among the 23 patients with hysterectomy-related complications, 18 (78%) experienced bladder injury, intraoperative bleeding (>2000 mL), or both. The use of chemotherapy did not improve success rates (P=0.064).

CONCLUSIONS

The present systematic review revealed high maternal morbidity during conservative management of placenta percreta.

Aortic balloon occlusion for controlling intraoperative hemorrhage in patients with placenta previa increta/percreta

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To investigate whether abdominal aortic balloon occlusion (ABO) effectively reduces intraoperative hemorrhage in patents with placenta previa increta/increta.

METHODS

Forty-three women were diagnosed as placenta previa increta/percreta by ultrasound and MRI. These patients' assessments were taken by their chief physician, and they were under necessity of previous cesarean section as confirmed by the committee of experts during consultation. There was no significant difference in disease risk rating between them in whole process. Although our department provided a more appropriate method, 10 of 43 patients chose intraoperative aortic balloon occlusion (IABO). Other 33 patients who refused that suggestion were considered as control group. Fully informed consents were obtained from all patients in this study group. The intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion, rate of hysterectomy and complications of mothers and fetus of IABO group and control group were analyzed.

RESULTS

The median intraoperative blood loss was 1000 ml in the IABO group compared with 2000 ml in the control group (p < 0.05). The median volume of transfused red blood cells was 1100 ml in the IABO group compared with 2000 ml in the control group (p < 0.05). 33.3% (11/33) patients in the control group had hemorrhagic shock, and one of them suffered from cardiac arrest intraoperatively because of severe bleeding. However, none of these serious events occurred in the IABO group (p < 0.05). The hysterectomy rate was 70% (7/10) in the IABO group and 63.3% (21/33) in the control group (p > 0.05). No IABO-related complications were observed in the mother and fetus.

CONCLUSION

IABO is an effective and safe method to control intraoperative blood loss and blood transfusion in patients with placenta previa increta/percreta.

Uterine salvage management for atonic postpartum hemorrhage using "modified lynch suture"

Background

To assess the effectiveness of the new modified technique in order to control bleeding in women presenting with atonic, flabby uterus compared to the most commonly described technique of classic B-Lynch suture.

Method

This study included 160 women of uncontrolled atonic postpartum hemorrhage delivered by cesarean section at Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital between January 2013 and October 2015. Participants were randomly assigned following simple randomization procedures (computerized random numbers) and divided into two groups. Group, I (80 patients) operated upon by the modified (new technique) stitch while group II (80 patients) operated upon by the classic technique. The ultimate goals were to stop blood loss after placement of the sutures and avoid life-saving hysterectomy thus preserving the life and fertility of the patient.

Results

The modified new technique was done in 80 patients with atonic postpartum hemorrhage and it was found to be superior to the classic technique with a success rate 95 % (4 cases needed hysterectomy as a lifesaving measure) compared to 85 % with the classic technique (in 12 cases, a life-saving hysterectomy was done).

Conclusions

This technique can replace the classic B-lynch in flabby unresponsive atonic uteri as it has 8 shaped placement of the stitch which causes more firm compression on the uterus and simultaneous bilateral uterine artery ligation. This technique was proved valuable and successful in many patients who suffer from uncontrolled massive postpartum hemorrhage (PPH).

Factors Contributing to Massive Blood Loss on Peripartum Hysterectomy for Abnormally Invasive Placenta: Who Bleeds More?

Introduction. To identify factors that determine blood loss during peripartum hysterectomy for abnormally invasive placenta (AIP-hysterectomy). Methods. We reviewed all of the medical charts of 11,919 deliveries in a single tertiary perinatal center. We examined characteristics of AIP-hysterectomy patients, with a single experienced obstetrician attending all AIP-hysterectomies and using the same technique. Results. AIP-hysterectomy was performed in 18 patients (0.15%: 18/11,919). Of the 18, 14 (78%) had a prior cesarean section (CS) history and the other 4 (22%) were primiparous women. Planned AIP-hysterectomy was performed in 12/18 (67%), with the remaining 6 (33%) undergoing emergent AIP-hysterectomy. Of the 6, 4 (4/6: 67%) patients were primiparous women. An intra-arterial balloon was inserted in 9/18 (50%). Women with the following three factors significantly bled less in AIP-hysterectomy than its counterpart: the employment of an intra-arterial balloon (4,448 ± 1,948 versus 8,861 ± 3,988 mL), planned hysterectomy (5,003 ± 2,057 versus 9,957 ± 4,485 mL), and prior CS (5,706 ± 2,727 versus 9,975 ± 5,532 mL). Patients with prior CS (-) bled more: this may be because these patients tended to undergo emergent surgery or attempted placental separation. Conclusion. Patients with intra-arterial balloon catheter insertion bled less on AIP-hysterectomy. Massive bleeding occurred in emergent AIP-hysterectomy without prior CS.

Urological Manifestations of Placenta Percreta

Placenta percreta is a condition of pregnancy associated with abnormal decidua placenta. It is characterized by invasion of chorionic villi past the myometrium and serosa, towards urogenital organs. Complications include massive hemorrhage, bladder dysfunction, and severe infections during delivery. Reports suggest an increasing prevalence of this condition. From a urological perspective, this review suggests how early diagnostic modalities, effective treatment plans, and appropriate surgical methods may aid in decreasing the morbidity and mortality of placenta percreta. The importance of maintaining bladder integrity during hysterectomy is emphasized.

Placenta percreta with a vaginal fistula after successful management by uterine transverse fundal incision and subsequent cesarean hysterectomy

Placenta previa presents a highest risk to pregnancy, and placenta accreta is the most serious. Placenta accreta requires cesarean delivery and often results in massive obstetric hemorrhage and higher maternal morbidity. Challenges associated with cesarean delivery techniques may contribute to increased maternal blood loss and morbidity rates. Several recent obstetric studies reported the usefulness of transverse uterine fundal incision for managing placenta accreta. We present a case of placenta percreta that was treated by a transverse fundal incision. We successfully avoided cutting through the placenta and helped decrease maternal blood loss. After delivery, the patient underwent a cesarean hysterectomy. Postoperative day 48, she experienced watery discharge and was diagnosed with vaginal fistula. We present our case and review the literature.

Placenta percreta managed by transverse uterine fundal incision with retrograde cesarean hysterectomy: a novel surgical approach

Key Clinical Message

Placenta percreta (with bladder invasion) is a rare obstetric condition with the risk of massive intraoperative hemorrhage. In these cases, the combination of a transverse uterine fundal incision and retrograde cesarean hysterectomy could be useful to minimize maternal hemorrhage and avoid severe bladder injury.

Anterior placentation as a risk factor for massive hemorrhage during cesarean section in patients with placenta previa

AIM

In placenta previa (PP), anterior placentation, compared with posterior placentation, is reported to more frequently cause massive hemorrhage during cesarean section (CS). Whether this is due to the high incidence of placenta accreta, previous CS, or a transplacental approach in anterior placenta is unclear. We attempted to clarify this issue.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the relation between the bleeding amount during CS for PP and various factors that may cause massive hemorrhage (>2400 mL) (n = 205) in a tertiary center. If the preoperatively ultrasound-measured distance from the internal cervical ostium to the placental edge was longer in the uterine anterior wall than in the posterior wall, we defined it as anterior previa, and vice versa.

RESULTS

Patients with accreta, previous CS, total previa, and anterior placentation bled significantly more than their counterparts. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that accreta (odds ratio [OR] 12.6), previous CS (OR 4.7), total previa (OR 4.1), and anterior placentation (OR 3.5) were independent risk factors of massive hemorrhage.

CONCLUSIONS

Anterior placentation, namely, the placenta with a longer os-placental edge distance in the anterior wall than in the posterior wall, was a risk of massive hemorrhage during CS for PP.