Value of the clinical history in the diagnosis of urticaria/angioedema induced by NSAIDs with cross-intolerance

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are major causes of drug-induced anaphylaxis

BACKGROUND

Drugs are responsible for 40% to 60% of anaphylactic reactions treated in the emergency department. A global research agenda to address uncertainties in anaphylaxis includes studies that identify factors associated with morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVE

The present study investigated drug-induced anaphylaxis, etiologies, aggravating factors, and treatment.

METHODS

A total of 806 patients with adverse drug reactions were screened, and those who had a clinical diagnosis of anaphylaxis were included in the study. Clinical and demographic characteristics of anaphylaxis were described, including etiologies, pathophysiologic mechanisms involved in the reactions, and a personal history of atopy and asthma. Factors associated with disease severity also were identified.

RESULTS

Anaphylaxis was diagnosed in 117 patients (14.5%). The etiologies were defined in 76% of the cases, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs being the most frequent. Seventy-eight patients (66.7%) reported a previous reaction to the drug involved in the current reaction or to a drug from the same class and/or group. Epinephrine was used to treat 34.2% of patients who presented with anaphylaxis, and 40.8% of those with anaphylactic reactions with cardiovascular involvement. IgE-mediated reactions were associated with greater severity, manifested by the rates of cardiovascular dysfunction, hospitalization, and use of epinephrine.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of anaphylaxis is high in patients who seek medical assistance for drug reactions, but its diagnosis is missed in emergency services, and adrenaline is underused. Drugs were prescribed to many patients despite a history of previous reaction. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were implicated in most cases of anaphylaxis induced by drugs, and IgE-mediated reactions were less frequent but more severe.

Basophil activation after nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs stimulation in patients with immediate hypersensitivity reactions to these drugs

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the drugs most frequently involved in allergic reactions of which two main types exist: IgE-mediated and crossintolerance. The diagnosis of crossintolerance reactions is often based on the drug provocation test. The potential value of the basophil activation test (BAT) was evaluated using different basophil markers in the diagnosis of patients with crossintolerance to NSAIDs and cutaneous symptoms. We studied 46 patients with crossintolerance to NSAIDs and 45 tolerant controls. BAT was performed with acetyl salicylic acid, paracetamol, diclofenac, dipyrone, naproxen, and ibuprofen at four different concentrations using CD193 and CD203c as basophil markers and CD63 as activation marker. We compared BAT results using CD193⁺ or CD193⁺ CD203c⁺ for basophil selection and found a significant increase in the stimulation index when using CD193⁺ CD203c⁺ in both patients and controls (P = 0.004 and P = 0.017, respectively). Selection of living cells only produced an increase in basophil stimulation in patients for both CD193⁺ and CD193⁺ CD203c⁺ (P < 0.001 for both), whereas in controls there was no change with CD193⁺ and a decrease with CD193⁺ CD203c⁺ (P = 0.001). We found that CD193⁺ CD203c⁺ increased the percentage of positive cases in patients and controls when compared with CD193⁺. When excluding dead cells, there was an increase of 21.7% in patients and 10% in controls. These results indicate that using CD193⁺ CD203⁺, excluding dead cells, is the best approach for BAT although this test is not recommended for the diagnosis of patients with crossintolerance to NSAIDs owing to its low sensitivity and specificity.

Multiple nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced cutaneous disease: what differentiates patients with and without underlying chronic spontaneous urticaria?

BACKGROUND

Multiple nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) cutaneous reactors may be otherwise normal or have underlying chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). This study compared these two phenotypes of NSAID-hypersensitive subjects.

METHODS

A total of 97 multiple NSAID reactors underwent oral challenges with paracetamol, etoricoxib and tramadol. Atopic status was investigated in all patients, and autoreactivity was ascertained in some cases as well. Otherwise normal multiple NSAID reactors were reevaluated after 1-5 years in order to detect their proneness to CSU.

RESULTS

At the first visit, 41 patients had CSU and 56 had multiple NSAID intolerance without any underlying cutaneous disease. Altogether, 22, 10 and 6% of patients did not tolerate paracetamol, etoricoxib and tramadol, respectively, on oral challenge. Intolerance to these alternative drugs showed a strong association (p < 0.01 with all combinations). The two subgroups of patients did not show any difference in terms of mean age, gender distribution, prevalence of atopic diseases, prevalence of single offending NSAIDs and prevalence of intolerance to paracetamol, etoricoxib or tramadol on oral challenge. In all, 20% of multiple NSAID reactors without CSU at presentation developed CSU between 6 months and 5 years after the initial clinical evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple NSAID cutaneous reactors with or without CSU seem identical from a clinical point of view, and some of the latter group show a propensity to acquire the former phenotype over time. A subset of patients apparently identical to the general population of multiple NSAID reactors also react to drugs exerting little or no cyclooxygenase-1 enzyme inhibition and might represent a distinct phenotype of NSAID-hypersensitive patients possibly characterized by a different underlying pathogenesis.

Genome-wide association study in NSAID-induced acute urticaria/angioedema in Spanish and Han Chinese populations

AIM

Acute urticaria/angioedema (AUA) induced by cross-intolerance to NSAIDs is the most frequent clinical entity in hypersensitivity reactions to drugs. In this work, we conducted a genome-wide association study in Spanish and Han Chinese patients suffering from NSAID-induced AUA.

MATERIALS & METHODS

A whole-genome scan was performed on a total of 232 cases (112 Spanish and 120 Han Chinese) with NSAID-induced AUA and 225 unrelated controls (124 Spanish and 101 Han Chinese).

RESULTS

Although no polymorphism reached genome-wide significance, we obtained suggestive associations for three clusters in the Spanish group (RIMS1, BICC1 and RAD51L 1) and one region in the Han Chinese population (ABI3BP). Five regions showed suggestive associations after meta-analysis: HLF, RAD51L1, COL24A1, GalNAc-T13 and FBXL7. A majority of these genes are related to Ca(2+), cAMP and/or P53 signaling pathways.

CONCLUSION

The associations described were different from those related to the metabolism of arachidonic acid and could provide new mechanisms underlying NSAID-induced AUA.

Variability in histamine receptor genes HRH1, HRH2 and HRH4 in patients with hypersensitivity to NSAIDs

Aim: Histamine plays an important role in the pathogenesis of allergic diseases. Genetic variations in histamine receptors (HRH) may influence the expression of allergic diseases. This study analyzes the association between HRH variants and NSAID hypersensitivity reactions. Patients & methods: The authors analyzed copy number variations (CNVs) and common functional SNPs in genes HRH1, HRH2 and HRH4 in 442 unrelated patients with hypersensitivity to NSAIDs and in 414 healthy unrelated controls. Results: The authors identified, both in patients and control subjects, individuals carrying CNVs in HRH genes. The most common genotype corresponded to two copies of each gene, but carriers of one or three copies of HRH1 (5% of individuals), HRH2 (1.1%) and HRH4 genes (0.9%) were also identified. Conclusion: For the first time, we describe CNVs in human HRH genes. Neither common functional SNPs in HRH genes nor CNVs influenced the risk of developing hypersensitivity to NSAIDs.

Original submitted 31 May 2013; Revision submitted 7 August 2013

Classification and practical approach to the diagnosis and management of hypersensitivity to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Hypersensitivity reactions to aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) constitute only a subset of all adverse reactions to these drugs, but due to their severity pose a significant burden to patients and are a challenge to the allergist. In susceptible individuals, NSAIDs induce a wide spectrum of hypersensitivity reactions with various timing, organ manifestations, and severity, involving either immunological (allergic) or nonimmunological mechanisms. Proper classification of reactions based on clinical manifestations and suspected mechanism is a prerequisite for the implementation of rational diagnostic procedures and adequate patient management. This document, prepared by a panel of experts from the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Task Force on NSAIDs Hypersensitivity, aims at reviewing the current knowledge in the field and proposes uniform definitions and clinically useful classification of hypersensitivity reactions to NSAIDs. The document proposes also practical algorithms for the diagnosis of specific types of NSAIDs hypersensitivity (which include drug provocations, skin testing and in vitro testing) and provides, when data are available, evidence-based recommendations for the management of hypersensitive patients, including drug avoidance and drug desensitization.

Mediator release after nasal aspirin provocation supports different phenotypes in subjects with hypersensitivity reactions to NSAIDs

BACKGROUND

Multiple NSAID-induced urticaria/angioedema (MNSAID-UA) is an entity well differentiated from aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD), although no detailed phenotype analysis has yet been performed. The objective was to evaluate the functional characteristics of MNSAID-UA subjects by analyzing the response to nasal lysine-aspirin challenge and measurement of nasal inflammatory mediator release compared with AERD subjects and controls.

METHODS

The study included 85 subjects with confirmed hypersensitivity to NSAIDs (≥3 episodes with >2 different NSAIDs or positive drug provocation) with either cutaneous (MNSAID-UA, n = 25) or respiratory manifestations (AERD, n = 60) and 30 tolerant controls (15 aspirin-tolerant asthmatic patients and 15 healthy controls). Nasal lavages at 0, 15, 60, and 120 min after lysine-aspirin challenge were analyzed for ECP, tryptase, PGE2 , PGD2 , LTD4 , and LTE4 .

RESULTS

Lysine nasal challenge was positive in 80% of the AERD cases but positive only in 12% of the MNSAID-UA group. MNSAID-UA subjects showed no changes in nasal ECP, whereas subjects with AERD had increased levels of ECP, with the highest peak at 15 min after challenge (P < 0.05). Tryptase levels were higher in AERD compared with MNSAID-UA and controls with the highest release of tryptase at 60 min (P < 0.05). Significant increases in PGD2 , LTD4 , and LTE4 were observed in AERD (at 60 min for PGD2 , LTD4 , and LTE4 ) but not in MNSAID-UA or control subjects (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Data support the observation that MNSAID-UA, although sharing a common response with AERD to COX inhibitors, seems to have a distinctive phenotype, based on the response to nasal challenge and the release of inflammatory mediators.

Drug provocation tests in the diagnosis of hypersensitivity reactions to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in children

INTRODUCTION

Hypersensitivity reactions to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the most frequently reported reaction to drugs. They can be induced by pharmacological mechanisms (cyclooxygenase inhibition), with patients classified as cross-intolerant (CI), or by specific immunological mechanisms, IgE or T cell, with patients classified as selective reactors (SR).

OBJECTIVE

To analyse a large group of children with a history of NSAID hypersensitivity diagnosed by drug provocation test (DPT).

METHODS

A group of 63 children with a history of NSAID hypersensitivity were evaluated by DPT. The children were classified as CI or SR depending on the acetyl salicylic acid (ASA) response in DPT. The atopic status was also assessed by prick tests and total IgE in serum.

RESULTS

Using DPT, 68.2% were confirmed as having hypersensitivity, 58.1% classified as CI and 41.9% as SR. Of the 119 DPT performed, 73 were positive (53.4% to ibuprofen, 37% to ASA, 8.2% to metamizol and 14% to paracetamol); angio-oedema was present in 86.3% of cases. All CI cases tolerated the administration of paracetamol. A significant number of the CI children were atopic compared with the SR children and non-allergic controls.

CONCLUSION

In these children, CI hypersensitivity to NSAIDs was the most frequent type of hypersensitivity reaction. Ibuprofen was the drug most often involved, angio-oedema the most common entity, and frequently associated with atopy. DPT proved a safe approach for diagnosing these patients.