Recommendations and consensus on the treatment of peritoneal metastases of colorectal origin: a systematic review of national and international guidelines

Adjuvant Systemic Chemotherapy vs Active Surveillance Following Up-front Resection of Isolated Synchronous Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases

Importance

To date, there are no data on the value of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy following up-front resection of isolated synchronous colorectal peritoneal metastases.

Objective

To assess the association between adjuvant systemic chemotherapy and overall survival following up-front resection of isolated synchronous colorectal peritoneal metastases.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this population-based, observational cohort study using nationwide data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (diagnoses between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2017; follow-up until January 31, 2019), 393 patients with isolated synchronous colorectal peritoneal metastases who were alive 3 months after up-front complete cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy were included. Patients allocated to the adjuvant systemic chemotherapy group were matched (1:1) with those allocated to the active surveillance group by propensity scores based on patient-, tumor-, and treatment-level covariates.

Exposures

Adjuvant systemic chemotherapy, defined as systemic chemotherapy without targeted therapy, starting within 3 months postoperatively.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Overall survival was compared between matched groups using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis adjusted for residual imbalance. A landmark analysis was performed by excluding patients who died within 6 months postoperatively. A sensitivity analysis was performed to adjust for unmeasured confounding by major postoperative morbidity.

Results

Of 393 patients (mean [SD] age, 61 [10] years; 181 [46%] men), 172 patients (44%) were allocated to the adjuvant systemic chemotherapy group. After propensity score matching of 142 patients in the adjuvant systemic chemotherapy group with 142 patients in the active surveillance group, adjuvant systemic chemotherapy was associated with improved overall survival compared with active surveillance (median, 39.2 [interquartile range, 21.1-111.1] months vs 24.8 [interquartile range, 15.0-58.4] months; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.66; 95% CI, 0.49-0.88; P = .006), which remained consistent after excluding patients who died within 6 months postoperatively (aHR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.50-0.93; P = .02) and after adjustment for major postoperative morbidity (aHR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53-0.95).

Conclusions and Relevance

Findings of this study suggest that in patients undergoing up-front resection of isolated synchronous colorectal peritoneal metastases, adjuvant systemic chemotherapy appeared to be associated with improved overall survival. Although randomized trials are needed to address the influence of potential residual confounding and allocation bias on this association, results of this study may be used for clinical decision-making in this patient group for whom no data are available.

Impact of Perfusate Concentration on Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Efficacy and Toxicity in a Rodent Model

BACKGROUND

Cytoreductive surgery followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been shown to be beneficial in treating limited peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) from colorectal cancer (CRC). Perfusate volume directly affects treatment concentration and therefore is a key parameter defining HIPEC; yet little is known about the impact of perfusate concentration on systemic toxicity and treatment morbidity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PC was induced through intraperitoneal injection of human CRC cell lines. A novel perfusion model was developed to treat athymic nude mice with continuous circulation of adequately miniaturized volumes of heated perfusate. Oxaliplatin HIPEC was performed applying different volumes of perfusate with fixed doses or fixed concentrations. Early postoperative mortality and morbidity were assessed as well as long-term survival. In addition, antiproliferative and proapoptotic effects of HIPEC were determined in vitro and in vivo.

RESULTS

Perfusate concentration crucially affected the toxicity of fixed-dose oxaliplatin HIPEC as indicated by postoperative weight loss and early postoperative mortality. Applying different perfusate volumes at a fixed concentration did not influence toxicity. Adequately miniaturized HIPEC with oxaliplatin did not exert relevant cytotoxic effects toward PC arising from human CRC cells in vivo.

CONCLUSIONS

We describe a novel murine model that adequately miniaturizes all physical parameters of HIPEC as applied in humans. HIPEC drug concentration is a crucial parameter determining excess toxicity and should be better standardized. HIPEC with oxaliplatin fails to induce relevant antitumor activity or to improve survival in this murine model of PC from CRC.

Patient-reported outcomes and experiences from the perspective of colorectal cancer survivors: meta-synthesis of qualitative studies

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is prevalent in the developed world. Favourable survival rates highlight the need to better understand CRC survivors' experiences of long-term impacts of treatment, which can in turn inform decision making. This systematic review aimed to identify and synthesise CRC survivors' experiences of long-term impacts on health-related quality of life.

METHODS

We searched Medline, Embase and PsychINFO from inception to January 2019. Qualitative studies describing CRC survivors' experiences at least 1-year post-treatment were included. Study eligibility, quality assessment (COREQ guidelines), and data synthesis was performed independently by two reviewers and discussed with the study team.

RESULTS

Of 1363 papers retrieved, 20 reporting 15 studies met eligibility. Thematic synthesis produced 12 themes: symptoms, physical, social, psychological and sexual functioning, impact on relationships, informal care needs provided by family/friend, supportive care needs provided by healthcare professional, health care experiences, health behaviour, financial toxicity and occupational experiences. Stoma problems (e.g. leakage, skin irritation) were common in ostomates. Survivors with no/reversed stoma experienced unexpected, long-term altered and unpredictable bowel functioning. Survivors often regulated timing, amount and foods consumed to manage bowel functioning. Less common symptoms included fatigue, impaired sleep and anal pain. Stoma problems and altered bowel functioning impaired survivors' physical, social, sexual and psychological functioning. Cognitive functioning and heredity issues were not reported in any paper.

CONCLUSION

CRC survivors experience ongoing symptoms and functioning impairments more than 1-year post-treatment completion. Many survivors find their own ways to manage symptoms rather than seek professional help. Follow-up care for CRC survivors should integrate screening for long-term effects and provide targeted supportive care.

Surgeons' Ability to Predict the Extent of Surgery Prior to Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy

Background

The extent of surgery (ES) during cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC) is a well-known risk factor for major postoperative morbidity. Interestingly, the reliability of surgeons to predict the ES prior to CRS + HIPEC is unknown.

Methods

In this prospective, observational cohort study, five surgeons predicted the ES prior to surgery in all consecutive patients with peritoneal metastases (PM) who were scheduled for CRS + HIPEC between March 2018 and May 2019. After the preoperative work-up for CRS + HIPEC was completed, all surgeons independently predicted, for each individual patient, the resection or preservation of 22 different anatomical structures and the presence of a stoma post-HIPEC according to a standardized ES form. The actual ES during CRS + HIPEC was extracted from the surgical procedure report and compared with the predicted ES. Overall and individual positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) for each anatomical structure were calculated.

Results

One hundred and thirty-one ES forms were collected from 32 patients who successfully underwent CRS + HIPEC. The number of resections was predicted correctly 24 times (18.3%), overestimated 57 times (43.5%), and underestimated 50 times (38.2%). Overall PPVs for the different anatomical structures ranged between 33.3 and 87.8%. Overall, NPVs ranged between 54.9 and 100%, and an NPV > 90% was observed for 12 anatomical structures.

Conclusions

Experienced surgeons seem to be able to better predict the anatomical structures that remain in situ after CRS + HIPEC, rather than predict the resections that were necessary to achieve a complete cytoreduction.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1245/s10434-020-08237-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Evolution of Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases: 8-Year Single-Institutional Experience

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Peritoneal metastases carry the worst prognosis among all sites of colorectal cancer metastases. In recent years, the advent and acceptance of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy have greatly improved survival for selected patients with low-volume peritoneal metastases.

OBJECTIVE

Here, we report the evolution of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal peritoneal metastases at a statewide tertiary referral center over an 8-year period.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective study from 2009 to 2017.

SETTING

The study was conducted at a single center over 8 years.

PATIENTS

Patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy were included.

MAIN OUTCOMES

Main outcomes included evaluation of grade III/IV morbidity rate, mortality rate, overall and relapse-free survival, and prognostic factors influencing survival on a Cox multivariate analysis model.

RESULTS

One hundred one cytoreductive surgeries were undertaken on 96 patients during this time for colorectal peritoneal metastases. The median patient age was 60 years with 55.2% being female. The median Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index was 9, with complete cytoreduction achieved in 76 (75.2%) cases. Grade III or IV complications occurred in 26 cases (25.7%) with 2 (2%) perioperative mortalities. Median overall survival for the entire cohort was 32 months, with a 3-year survival of 38%. For patients who achieved a complete cytoreduction, median overall survival was 37 months, with a relapse-free survival of 13 months and a 3-year survival of 54%. Complete cytoreduction and nonmucinous histology were key factors independently associated with improved overall survival.

LIMITATIONS

The main limitation this study is its retrospective nature.

CONCLUSION

Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for isolated low-volume colorectal peritoneal metastases is safe and effective, with low morbidity. It offers selected patients a highly favorable overall and relapse-free survival. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B2. EVOLUCIÓN DE LA CIRUGÍA CITORREDUCTIVA Y QUIMIOTERAPIA INTRAPERITONEAL HIPERTÉRMICA (HIPEC) PARA METÁSTASIS PERITONEALES COLORRECTALES: EXPERIENCIA INSTITUCIONAL DE 8 AÑOS: El cáncer colorrectal es la segunda causa de mortalidad relacionada con el cáncer en todo el mundo. Las metástasis peritoneales tienen el peor pronóstico entre todos los sitios de metástasis del cáncer colorrectal. En los últimos años, el advenimiento y la aceptación de la cirugía citorreductiva y la quimioterapia intraperitoneal hipertérmica ha mejorado enormemente la supervivencia de pacientes seleccionados con metástasis peritoneales de bajo volumen.

OBJETIVO

Aquí, informamos sobre la evolución de la cirugía citorreductiva y la quimioterapia intraperitoneal hipertérmica para las metástasis peritoneales colorrectales en un centro de referencia terciario para todo el estado durante un período de ocho años. DISEÑO:: Estudio retrospectivo del 2009 a 2017. CONFIGURACIÓN:: Centro único a lo largo de ocho años.

PACIENTES

Pacientes con metástasis peritoneales colorrectales sometidos a cirugía citorreductiva y quimioterapia intraperitoneal hipertérmica.

RESULTADOS PRINCIPALES

Los resultados principales incluyeron la evaluación de la tasa de morbilidad de grado III / IV, la tasa de mortalidad, la supervivencia general y libre de recaída y los factores pronósticos que influyen en la supervivencia en el modelo de análisis multivariado Cox.

RESULTADOS

Se realizaron el ciento uno cirugías citorreductivas en noventa y seis pacientes durante este tiempo por metástasis peritoneales colorrectales. La edad media de los pacientes fue de 60 años, con un 55.2% de mujeres. El Índice de Carcinomatosis Peritoneal mediano fue de 9, con una citorreducción completa lograda en 76 (75.2%) casos. Las complicaciones de grado III o IV ocurrieron en 26 casos (25.7%) con dos (2%) de mortalidad perioperatoria. La supervivencia mediana general para toda la cohorte fue de 32 meses, con una supervivencia de 3 años del 38%. Para los pacientes que lograron una citorreducción completa, la supervivencia global media fue de 37 meses, con una supervivencia sin recaída de 13 meses y una supervivencia de 3 años del 54%. La citorreducción completa y la histología no mucinosa fueron factores clave asociados de forma independiente con una mejor supervivencia general.

LIMITACIONES

La principal limitación es la naturaleza retrospectiva del estudio. CONCLUSIÓN:: La cirugía citorreductiva y la quimioterapia intraperitoneal hipertérmica para las metástasis peritoneales colorrectales aisladas de bajo volumen son seguras y eficaces, con baja morbilidad. Ofrece a los pacientes seleccionados una supervivencia global altamente favorable y libre de recaída. Vea el Resumen del video en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B2.

P.R.O.P.S. - A novel Pre-Operative Predictive Score for unresectability in patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases being considered for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC)

Background

Twenty to thirty percent of planned cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS and HIPEC) procedures are abandoned intra-operatively. Pre-operative factors associated with unresectability identified previously were used to develop a Pre-Operative Predictive Score (PROPS), which was compared with current selection criteria—Peritoneal Surface Disease Severity Score (PSDSS), Verwaal’s Prognostic Score (PS) and Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases Prognostic Surgical Score (COMPASS), to determine which score provides the best prediction for unresectability.

Methods

Fifty-six patients with peritoneal metastases of colorectal origin were included. Beta-coefficient values of significant variables (p < 0.05) were determined from multivariate analysis to develop PROPS. PROPS, PSDSS, PS and COMPASS were compared using a receiver operating characteristic curve to calculate its accuracy, sensitivity and specificity.

Results

PROPS consisted of nine patient and tumour factors which were categorised into three groups: (i) poor tumour biology: previous inadequate resection, underwent multiple lines of chemotherapy and poorly differentiated or signet cell histology; (ii) heavy tumour burden: abdominal distension, palpable abdominal mass and computed tomography findings of ascites, small bowel disease and/or omental thickening; and (iii) active tumour proliferation: elevated tumour markers. Overall, PROPS achieved 86% accuracy with 100% sensitivity and 68% specificity, PSDSS achieved 85% accuracy with 100% sensitivity and 63% specificity, PS achieved 73% accuracy with 100% sensitivity and 68% specificity and COMPASS achieved 61% accuracy with 27% sensitivity and 100% specificity.

Conclusions

PROPS is more effective in predicting unresectability as compared to PSDSS, PS and COMPASS, and has the added advantage of using solely pre-operative factors.

Colorectal peritoneal metastases: Optimal management review

The peritoneum is a common site of dissemination for colorrectal cancer, with a poorer prognosis than other sites of metastases. In the last two decades, it has been considered as a locoregional disease progression and treated as such with curative intention treatments. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is the actual reference treatment for these patients as better survival results have been reached as compared to systemic chemotherapy alone, but its therapeutic efficacy is still under debate. Actual guidelines recommend that the management of colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastases should be led by a multidisciplinary team carried out in experienced centers and consider CRS + HIPEC for selected patients. Accumulative evidence in the last three years suggests that this is a curative treatment that may improve patients disease-free survival, decrease the risk of recurrence, and does not increase the risk of treatment-related mortality. In this review we aim to gather the latest results from referral centers and opinions from experts about the effectiveness and feasibility of CRS + HIPEC for treating peritoneal disease from colorectal malignancies.

Accelerating the learning curve in cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy using an external mentor model

BACKGROUND

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is an accepted therapeutic approach in selected patients with peritoneal malignancy. The aim of this study was to describe early outcomes in the first 50 patients managed with CRS and HIPEC in a newly established peritoneal malignancy centre in Sydney, Australia, under the guidance of an experienced peritoneal malignancy mentor.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of a prospective maintained database of early outcomes in the first 50 patients who underwent CRS and HIPEC between April 2017 and April 2018 at a newly established peritoneal malignancy centre. Type of primary, surgery time, length of hospital stay, blood loss, peritoneal carcinomatosis index, completeness of surgery, complications, recurrence rate and 30-day mortality were reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 135 patients were referred and reviewed at the multidisciplinary team meeting with 50 (26 male) patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC. Of these 50 patients, 47 (94%) underwent complete cytoreduction while three (6%) had maximal tumour debulking surgery. Tumour pathology was of appendix origin (44%) and colorectal peritoneal metastases (44%). Median surgical time was 7.4 h (interquartile range 5.7-10.0). Median length of hospital stay was 13 days (interquartile range 9.7-19.0). Six (12%) patients experienced a grade III or IV Clavien-Dindo complication. There was no 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSION

This study reports the successful establishment of a peritoneal malignancy centre under the guidance of an experienced peritoneal malignancy mentor. The short-term surgical outcomes observed in the first 50 cases are promising and comparable to other more experienced centres.

Impact of anesthesia management during cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for the treatment of colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis on intra- and postoperative outcomes: A systematic review protocol

BACKGROUND

The impact of the anesthesia management during cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for the treatment of colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis (CRPC) on postoperative outcomes might be of major importance in the process of postoperative recovery. It might have a significant impact on intra- and postoperative outcomes, but the evaluation of this impact seems to be under-reported. To investigate the question whether the anesthesia management was reported in previous studies done in this population and if it had any impact on postoperative outcomes, we propose to conduct a systematic review of the published literature.

METHODS

For this review, we will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P). Medline/PubMed, Embase, EBM Reviews and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) will be systematically consulted for eligible studies without age, gender, ethnic, and language restriction. The goal of this review will be to assess whether anesthesia monitoring, dosing, and analgesia protocols were reported in this literature on this specific procedure and whether the impact of the anesthesia management on intraoperative safety and postoperative recovery was evaluated.

RESULTS

The results of this systematic review will allow to answer the initial question: has the impact of anesthesia management on intraoperative safety and patients' postoperative recovery already been studied and reported in the past for this type of major surgery? And does anesthesia have any impact on postoperative outcomes?

DISCUSSION

In the hypothesis that the impact of anesthesia management on patients' postoperative recovery has never been studied, or very little reported in previous studies in this type of major surgery, it would be justified to conduct a randomized controlled trial on this specific objective.

REGISTRATION

This systematic review protocol was registered in PROSPERO, under the registration number CRD42019124162.

Perioperative systemic therapy and cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC versus upfront cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC alone for isolated resectable colorectal peritoneal metastases: protocol of a multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, phase II-III, randomised, superiority study (CAIRO6)

Background

Upfront cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC (CRS-HIPEC) is the standard treatment for isolated resectable colorectal peritoneal metastases (PM) in the Netherlands. This study investigates whether addition of perioperative systemic therapy to CRS-HIPEC improves oncological outcomes.

Methods

This open-label, parallel-group, phase II-III, randomised, superiority study is performed in nine Dutch tertiary referral centres. Eligible patients are adults who have a good performance status, histologically or cytologically proven resectable PM of a colorectal adenocarcinoma, no systemic colorectal metastases, no systemic therapy for colorectal cancer within six months prior to enrolment, and no previous CRS-HIPEC. Eligible patients are randomised (1:1) to perioperative systemic therapy and CRS-HIPEC (experimental arm) or upfront CRS-HIPEC alone (control arm) by using central randomisation software with minimisation stratified by a peritoneal cancer index of 0–10 or 11–20, metachronous or synchronous PM, previous systemic therapy for colorectal cancer, and HIPEC with oxaliplatin or mitomycin C. At the treating physician’s discretion, perioperative systemic therapy consists of either four 3-weekly neoadjuvant and adjuvant cycles of capecitabine with oxaliplatin (CAPOX), six 2-weekly neoadjuvant and adjuvant cycles of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin with oxaliplatin (FOLFOX), or six 2-weekly neoadjuvant cycles of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin with irinotecan (FOLFIRI) followed by four 3-weekly (capecitabine) or six 2-weekly (5-fluorouracil/leucovorin) adjuvant cycles of fluoropyrimidine monotherapy. Bevacizumab is added to the first three (CAPOX) or four (FOLFOX/FOLFIRI) neoadjuvant cycles. The first 80 patients are enrolled in a phase II study to explore the feasibility of accrual and the feasibility, safety, and tolerance of perioperative systemic therapy. If predefined criteria of feasibility and safety are met, the study continues as a phase III study with 3-year overall survival as primary endpoint. A total of 358 patients is needed to detect the hypothesised 15% increase in 3-year overall survival (control arm 50%; experimental arm 65%). Secondary endpoints are surgical characteristics, major postoperative morbidity, progression-free survival, disease-free survival, health-related quality of life, costs, major systemic therapy related toxicity, and objective radiological and histopathological response rates.

Discussion

This is the first randomised study that prospectively compares oncological outcomes of perioperative systemic therapy and CRS-HIPEC with upfront CRS-HIPEC alone for isolated resectable colorectal PM.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov/NCT02758951, NTR/NTR6301, ISRCTN/ISRCTN15977568, EudraCT/2016–001865-99.

Consensus and controversies regarding follow-up after treatment with curative intent of nonmetastatic colorectal cancer: a synopsis of guidelines used in countries represented in the European Society of Coloproctology

AIM

It is common clinical practice to follow patients for a period of years after treatment with curative intent of nonmetastatic colorectal cancer, but follow-up strategies vary widely. The aim of this systematic review was to provide an overview of recommendations on this topic in guidelines from member countries of the European Society of Coloproctology, with supporting evidence.

METHOD

A systematic search of Medline, Embase and the guideline databases Trip database, BMJ Best Practice and Guidelines International Network was performed. Quality assessment included use of the AGREE-II tool. All topics with recommendations from included guidelines were identified and categorized. For each subtopic, a conclusion was made followed by the degree of consensus and the highest level of evidence.

RESULTS

Twenty-one guidelines were included. The majority recommended that structured follow-up should be offered, except for patients in whom treatment of recurrence would be inappropriate. It was generally agreed that clinical visits, measurement of carcinoembryoinc antigen and liver imaging should be part of follow-up, based on a high level of evidence, although the frequency is controversial. There was also consensus on imaging of the chest and pelvis in rectal cancer, as well as endoscopy, based on lower levels of evidence and with a level of intensity that was contradictory.

CONCLUSION

In available guidelines, multimodal follow-up after treatment with curative intent of colorectal cancer is widely recommended, but the exact content and intensity are highly controversial. International agreement on the optimal follow-up schedule is unlikely to be achieved on current evidence, and further research should refocus on individualized 'patient-driven' follow-up and new biomarkers.

Strategies for Managing Intraoperative Discovery of Limited Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases

BACKGROUND

Management of limited synchronous colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRPM) is critical to outcome. Resection of the primary tumor and CRPM can be performed concurrently, followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) either immediately, during the same procedure (one-stage), or during a systematic second-stage procedure (two-stage).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare these two strategies for morbidity, mortality, and survival.

METHODS

All patients presenting with limited (initial Peritoneal Cancer Index [PCI] ≤ 10) synchronous CRPM who had undergone complete cytoreductive surgery plus HIPEC between 2000 and 2016 were selected from a prospectively maintained institutional database.

RESULTS

Overall, 74 patients were included-31 in the one-stage group and 43 in the two-stage group. During second-stage surgery, a peritoneal recurrence was diagnosed in 37 (86%) patients, 12 of whom had a PCI > 10 (28%) and 2 of whom had unresectable disease (5%). Among the one-stage group, peritoneal recurrence occurred in 29% of patients after a median delay of 23 months. Overall survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was similar between the two groups, i.e. 96%, 59%, and 51% for the one-stage group, and 98%, 77%, and 61% for the two-stage group. A PCI > 10 at the time of HIPEC, as well as liver metastases, were independent negative prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

For incidental limited CRPM diagnosed during primary tumor resection, one-stage curative treatment is preferable, avoiding a supplementary surgical procedure. Given the critical issues associated with completeness of resection, patients should be referred to centers specialized in peritoneal surgery.

Importance and Presence of High-Quality Evidence for Clinical Decisions in Neurosurgery: International Survey of Neurosurgeons

BACKGROUND

The publication rate of neurosurgical guidelines has increased tremendously over the past decade; however, only a small proportion of clinical decisions appear to be based on high-quality evidence.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to evaluate the evidence available within neurosurgery and its value within clinical practice according to neurosurgeons.

METHODS

A Web-based survey was sent to 2552 neurosurgeons, who were members of the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies.

RESULTS

The response rate to the survey was 6.78% (173/2552). According to 48.6% (84/173) of the respondents, neurosurgery clinical practices are based on less evidence than other medical specialties and not enough high-quality evidence is available; however, 84.4% (146/173) of the respondents believed neurosurgery is amenable to evidence. Of the respondents, 59.0% (102/173) considered the neurosurgical guidelines in their hospital to be based on high-quality evidence, most of whom considered their own treatments to be based on high-quality (level I and/or level II) data (84.3%, 86/102; significantly more than for the neurosurgeons who did not consider the hospital guidelines to be based on high-quality evidence: 55%, 12/22; P<.001). Also, more neurosurgeons with formal training believed they could understand, criticize, and interpret statistical outcomes presented in journals than those without formal training (93%, 56/60 and 68%, 57/84 respectively; P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

According to the respondents, neurosurgery is based on high-quality evidence less often than other medical specialties. The results of the survey indicate that formal training in evidence-based medicine would enable neurosurgeons to better understand, criticize, and interpret statistical outcomes presented in journals.

The Role of Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Appendiceal Tumors and Colorectal Adenocarcinomas

Peritoneal surface disease (PSD) has historically been used interchangeably with the term peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) and has a dismal natural history. A variety of malignant pathologies, including colorectal and appendiceal primary tumors, can disseminate throughout the peritoneal cavity, leading to bowel obstruction and death. In general, peritoneal spread from high-grade appendiceal and colorectal primaries has the potential of hepatic and distant spread and best classified as PC. Low-grade appendiceal tumors are better categorized as PSD, due to low cellularity, high mucin production, and lack of potential spread outside the peritoneal cavity. Growing international experience with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) over the past 30 years has presented a therapeutic option to patients with PSD from colorectal and appendiceal tumors that can provide significant disease control, as well as potential for previously unattainable long-term survival. The proliferation of HIPEC centers and ongoing prospective trials are helping to standardize HIPEC techniques and patient selection.

Perioperative Systemic Chemotherapy, Cytoreductive Surgery, and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Patients With Colorectal Peritoneal Metastasis: Results of the Prospective Multicenter Phase 2 COMBATAC Trial

BACKGROUND

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) as parts of an interdisciplinary treatment concept including systemic chemotherapy can improve survival of selected patients with peritoneal metastatic colorectal cancer (pmCRC). Nevertheless, the sequence of the therapeutic options is still a matter of debate. Thus, the COMBATAC (COMBined Anticancer Treatment of Advanced Colorectal cancer) trial was conducted to evaluate a combined treatment regimen consisting of preoperative systemic polychemotherapy + cetuximab followed by CRS + HIPEC and postoperative systemic polychemotherapy + cetuximab.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The COMBATAC trial is a prospective, multicenter, open-label, single-arm, single-stage phase 2 trial. Twenty-six patients with synchronous or metachronous colorectal or appendiceal peritoneal carcinomatosis were included. Enrollment was terminated prematurely by the sponsor because of slow recruitment. Progression-free survival as primary end point and overall survival were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Also evaluated were morbidity according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 and feasibility of the combined treatment concept.

RESULTS

Median progression-free survival for the intention-to-treat population (n = 25) was 14.9 months. Median overall survival was not reached during the study duration. Ninety-two adverse events were documented in 16 patients, including 14 serious adverse events in 9 patients. The overall morbidity rate was 64%, and the grade 3/4 morbidity rate was 44%. Of all grade 3/4 morbidity events, 36.4% were related to systemic chemotherapy and 22.7% to surgery, whereas 40.9% were not directly related. There was no treatment-related mortality.

CONCLUSION

The results of the COMBATAC trial show that the multimodal treatment concept consisting of perioperative systemic chemotherapy and CRS + HIPEC is safe and feasible. Progression-free survival in selected patients with colorectal or appendiceal peritoneal metastasis might be improved.

Current Opinion and Knowledge on Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: A Survey among a Swiss Oncology Network

Aims of the Study: The present survey aimed to evaluate current opinion and practice regarding peritoneal metastasis (PM), satisfaction with available treatment options, and need for new therapeutic approaches. Methods: This was a qualitative study conducted between October 2016 and October 2017 in the Réseau Suisse Romand d’Oncologie including 101 members of various oncological specialties. Participants’ demographics, current practice, knowledge, and satisfaction regarding available treatment options and need for new treatment options were assessed by semantic differential scales through 33 closed questions with automatic reminders at 4-, 8-, 12-, and 16-week intervals. Results: Twenty-seven participants (27%) completed the survey. Participants were gastrointestinal or gynecologic oncologists and surgeons. Most participants (67%) evaluated their knowledge on PM as moderate, while 22% considered themselves as experts. Clinical usefulness of systemic chemotherapy and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy was judged to be moderate to high for PM of ovarian and colorectal origin and moderate to poor for gastric origin. Satisfaction with available treatment options was 6/10 (interquartile range [IQR] 4–7) for ovarian, 5/10 (IQR 3–7) for colorectal, and 3/10 (IQR 1–3) for gastric PM. Treatment strategies varied widely for typical case vignettes. The need for new treatment modalities was rated as 8/10 (IQR 6–10). Conclusion: Usefulness of and satisfaction with available treatment options for PM were rated as moderate at best by oncological experts, and treatment strategies differed importantly among participants. There appears to be a clear need for standardization and new treatment modalities.

Synchronous peritoneal metastases of small bowel adenocarcinoma: Insights into an underexposed clinical phenomenon

BACKGROUND

The aim of this population-based study was to provide insight into the incidence, risk factors and treatment-related survival of patients with peritoneal metastases (PM) of small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA).

METHODS

Data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry were used. All patients diagnosed with SBA between 2005 and 2014 were included. The influence of patient and tumour characteristics on the odds of developing PM was analysed. Subsequently, for all further analyses, patients without synchronous PM of SBA were excluded. The log-rank test and Kaplan-Meier analyses were conducted to estimate survival, and the Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the risk of death.

RESULTS

Of the 1428 included patients diagnosed with SBA, 181 (13%) presented with synchronous PM. Synchronous PM was found in 9% of the duodenal tumours and in 17% of the more distal tumours. Median overall survival of all patients with PM was 5.9 months, whereas survival of both 11 months was observed in patients treated with primary tumour resection or palliative chemotherapy and 32 months after cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS+HIPEC). Poor prognostic factors for survival were age ≥70 years (hazard ratio [HR] 1.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-2.2), systemic metastases other than PM (HR 2.0, 95% CI 1.4-2.9) and an advanced (HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.3-3.0) or unknown T-stage (HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.2-3.5).

CONCLUSIONS

Synchronous PM was frequently encountered in SBA. Without treatment, prognosis was extremely poor. Survival was higher after primary tumour resection, palliative chemotherapy and CRS+HIPEC, but selection bias probably played a significant role calling for further clinical research.

Przerzuty do otrzewnej raka jelita grubego

Częstość przerzutów do otrzewnej w raku jelita grubego wynosi 5%-15% w przypadku przerzutów synchronicznych i aż 40% w przypadku wystąpienia wznowy miejscowej. Najlepsze wyniki leczenia uzyskuje się poprzez skojarzone wykonanie zabiegu cytoredukcyjnego w połączeniu z dootrzewnową chemioterapią perfuzyjną w hipertermii (HIPEC). Wyniki takiego leczenia są zdecydowanie lepsze i pozwalają na osiągnięcie przeżyć 5-letnich na poziomie 30%-50%. Zabiegi te wymagają dużego doświadczenia w chirurgii jamy brzusznej, są czasochłonne (średni czas procedury chirurgicznej wynosi 6-8 godzin) i obarczone powikłaniami związanymi nie tylko z zabiegiem operacyjnym, ale także podaniem cytostatyku do jamy otrzewnej w podwyższonej temperaturze (41,5 st. C). Chorzy po zabiegu wymagają pobytu na oddziale intensywnej terapii, co jest związane z wystąpieniem potencjalnych powikłań spowodowanych rozległością zabiegu, długością procedury chirurgicznej, zastosowaniu chemioterapii w połączeniu z hipertermią. Prowadzenie pooperacyjne tych chorych wymaga doświadczenia całego zespołu lekarskiego i pielęgniarskiego. Zabiegi cytoredukcyjne w połączeniu z HIPEC jako wysoce specjalistyczne procedury medyczne powinny być merytorycznie ocenione pod kątem korzyści długoterminowych dla chorych i odpowiednio skalkulowane pod względem realnej wysokości refundacji. Jako procedura zalecana w wytycznych Kionsultanta Krajowego d.s. Chirurgii Onkologicznej oraz wytycznych ESMO, niezbędna jest jej realna wycena i refundacja pokrywająca jej całkowite średnie koszty.

Curative versus palliative treatments for colorectal cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The objective of this study was to provide an up-to-date summary of the current evidence that may be useful for updating guidelines. We comprehensively searched the published literatures and conferences for studies that compared curative with palliative treatments in colorectal cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis. The primary outcomes considered in this study were three- and five-year overall survival rates. We pooled data across studies and estimated summary effect sizes. Overall, patients who received curative treatments had improved three-year survival (hazard ratio (HR), 2.19 [95% CI, 1.83 to 2.62]) and five-year survival (HR, 2.22 [95% CI, 1.83 to 2.69]) compared with those who received palliative treatments. Patients who received curative treatments had an increased risk of treatment-related morbidity (odds ratio (OR), 2.90 [95% CI, 2.02 to 4.17]), but there was no significant difference in treatment-related mortality between patients who received curative treatments and those who received palliative treatments (OR, 1.46 [CI, 0.62 to 3.47]). Curative treatments improved overall survival in colorectal cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis and did not increase the risk of treatment-related mortality. Curative treatments were associated with a higher risk of treatment-related morbidity. These data highlight the importance for further investigation aimed at prevention of treatment-associated morbidity.