Prognostic factors in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib

The ART of decision making: retreatment with transarterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

We aimed to establish an objective point score to guide the decision for retreatment with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In all, 222 patients diagnosed with HCC and treated with multiple TACE cycles between January 1999 and December 2009 at the Departments of Gastroenterology/Hepatology of the Medical Universities of Vienna (training cohort) and Innsbruck (validation cohort) were included. We investigated the effect of the first TACE on parameters of liver function and tumor response and their impact on overall survival (OS, log rank test) and developed a point score (ART score: Assessment for Retreatment with TACE) in the training cohort (n = 107, Vienna) by using a stepwise Cox regression model. The ART score was externally validated in an independent validation cohort (n = 115, Innsbruck). The increase of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) by >25% (hazard ratio [HR] 8.4; P < 0.001), an increase of Child-Pugh score of 1 (HR 2.0) or ≥2 points (HR 4.4) (P < 0.001) from baseline, and the absence of radiologic tumor response (HR 1.7; P = 0.026) remained independent negative prognostic factors for OS and were used to create the ART score. The ART score differentiated two groups (0-1.5 points; ≥2.5 points) with distinct prognosis (median OS: 23.7 versus 6.6 months; P < 0.001) and a higher ART score was associated with major adverse events after the second TACE (P = 0.011). These results were confirmed in the external validation cohort and remained significant irrespective of Child-Pugh stage and the presence of ascites prior the second TACE.

CONCLUSION

An ART score of ≥2.5 prior the second TACE identifies patients with a dismal prognosis who may not profit from further TACE sessions. (HEPATOLOGY 2013;57:2261-2273).

The impact of patient and tumour baseline characteristics on the overall survival of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib

BACKGROUND

Impact of patient and tumour baseline characteristics on the overall survival is not well characterized in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with sorafenib.

AIMS/METHODS

Univariate/multivariate analyses were conducted to identify retrospectively the impact of baseline characteristics on the survival of 110 patients with advanced HCC treated with sorafenib.

RESULTS

Median survival of the whole cohort was 6.7 months, median survival in Child-Pugh A, B, C patients was 10.5, 6.1 and 3.0 months and median survival of patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C/D was 6.8/2.6 months. Presence of ascites, presence of macrovascular invasion and BCLC stage D (mainly determined by Child-Pugh C status and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status>2) remained independent prognostic factors for the survival on multivariate analysis. Particularly, the presence of macrovascular invasion significantly influenced survival both in patients with liver cirrhosis Child-Pugh A and Child-Pugh B.

CONCLUSION

Well maintained liver function and performance status are prerequisites for sorafenib treatment in patients with advanced HCC. Our findings do not support routine clinical use of sorafenib in Child-Pugh B patients. Evaluation of ascites and particularly macrovascular invasion might help to identify patients more likely to benefit from sorafenib treatment.

Expression and prognostic value of VEGFR-2, PDGFR-β, and c-Met in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

We explore the clinical and prognostic significance of expression of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-2, platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR)-β, and c-Met in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

The expression of VEGFR-2, PDGFR-β, and c-Met were determined by immunohistochemical examination of the tissues of 93 HCC patients. The relationships of these markers with clinicopathological factors and prognosis were then analyzed.

RESULTS

High expression of VEGFR-2, PDGFR-β, and c-Met was found in 86%, 19.4%, and 80.6% of patients, respectively. Expression of VEGFR-2 correlated with gender (P = 0.044), hepatitis B surface antigen positivity (P = 0.024), degree of tumor differentiation (P = 0.023), and hepatic cirrhosis (P = 0.026). Expression of PDGFR-β correlated with alpha-fetoprotein level (P = 0.029), tumor size (P = 0.033), and hepatic cirrhosis (P = 0.023). No significant correlations were identified between expression of c-Met and clinicopathological factors. Expression of PDGFR-β correlated with overall survival (P = 0.046) and expression of c-Met correlated with progression-free survival (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that in patients with HCC, high expression of VEGFR-2 correlates with chronic hepatitis B virus infection and hepatic cirrhosis. High expression of PDGFR-β is a predictor of poor prognosis. High expression of C-Met may predict therapeutic effectiveness of sorafenib in HCC patients.

CF102 for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase I/II, open-label, dose-escalation study

BACKGROUND

The A(3) adenosine receptor (A(3)AR) is overexpressed in the tumor and in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The orally active drug candidate CF102, an A(3)AR agonist, induces apoptosis of HCC cells via deregulation of the Wnt signaling pathway. In this open label phase I/II trial, the safety and clinical effects of CF102 were assessed in patients with advanced unresectable HCC.

METHODS

The primary objectives of this trial were to examine the safety and pharmacokinetic (PK) behavior of CF102 given orally (1, 5, and 25 mg BID) in 28-day cycles. Evaluation of anti-tumor effects and the utilization of A(3)AR as a biological predictive marker of response to CF102 were the secondary objectives.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients received CF102-six at each dose level. No serious drug-related adverse events or dose-limiting toxicities were observed. CF102 demonstrated good oral bioavailability and linear PK behavior. Median overall survival in the study population, 67% of whom had received prior sorafenib, was 7.8 months, and for Child Pugh B patients (28%) it was 8.1 months. Stable disease by RECIST was observed in four patients for at least 4 months. CF102 maintained liver function over a 6-month period. A correlation between receptor overexpression levels at baseline and patients' overall survival was found. One of the patients who presented with skin nodules that were biopsy-proven to be HCC metastases prior to the trial showed complete metastasis regression during three months of treatment with CF102.

CONCLUSIONS

CF102 is safe and well-tolerated, showing favorable PK characteristics in Child Pugh A and B HCC patients, justifying further clinical development.

The anti-viral effect of sorafenib in hepatitis C-related hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Sorafenib is currently the only approved systemic therapy shown to have efficacy in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Recent studies suggest that hepatitis C (HCV)-related HCC patients derive more clinical benefit from sorafenib than other subgroups, but the mechanism for this effect is unknown. In vitro data suggest that sorafenib may exert anti-viral properties, and thus our aim in this study was to evaluate potential anti-viral activity of sorafenib in patients with HCV-related HCC.

AIM

To evaluate potential anti-viral activity of sorafenib in patients with HCV-related HCC.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled patients with HCV-related HCC treated with sorafenib for up to 6 months. Baseline clinical, viral and oncologic data were collected. Patients' HCV viral loads were obtained at various time points, and compared with their baseline viral levels. No patients received any known anti-viral therapy during this time.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients were identified with baseline and subsequent HCV levels available for analysis. Six patients completed 6 months of full dose sorafenib, and comparisons of their HCV viral loads showed no significant change at week 24 (difference of means = 0.3500, CI: -0.1799-0.8799, P = 0.150), or the interim time points. Similarly, the HCV viral loads of all patients who received sorafenib and the viral loads of those patients who had tumour response to sorafenib showed no significant changes at any time point.

CONCLUSION

Despite preclinical data and previous subgroup analyses suggesting that sorafenib has an anti-viral effect against HCV, this study suggests that sorafenib lacks significant anti-viral activity in HCV patients with HCC.

Delayed Diagnosis of HCC with Chronic Alcoholic Liver Disease

BACKGROUND

Adherence to surveillance recommendations for patients at risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is influenced by several factors, including the etiology of chronic liver disease.

AIM

The aim of this study was to analyze whether tumor stage at diagnosis and prognosis differ in patients with alcohol-related HCC compared to those with chronic viral hepatitis-related HCC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Medical records of 650 patients diagnosed with HCC between 1994 and 2011 were analyzed retrospectively. Groups were formed from patients having either alcohol abuse or viral hepatitis (chronic hepatitis B or C virus infection) as the only known HCC risk factors. Demographic data (age and gender), tumor stage at diagnosis, survival, liver function [Child-Pugh-Turcotte (CPT) score] in patients with liver cirrhosis, complications of liver cirrhosis, and serologic parameters were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 393 HCC cases (male 84%, median age 65 years) were identified, with alcohol abuse as the causative factor in 76.8% and chronic viral hepatitis in 23.2%. In patients with alcohol abuse, 278 (92.1%) were diagnosed with liver cirrhosis (CPT A 49.3%, CPT B 31.1%, CPT C 9.6%), while in patients with viral hepatitis, 84 (92.3%) suffered from liver cirrhosis (CPT A 59.3%, CPT B 23.1%, CPT C 8.8%). Tumor stage in patients with alcohol abuse was Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) C in 43.7%, BCLC B in 30.5%, and BCLC A in 14.6%. Patients with viral hepatitis showed a trend toward diagnosis at an earlier tumor stage (BCLC B 35.2%, BCLC C 34.1%, BCLC A 22.2%). Etiology of liver cirrhosis did not significantly influence survival in intermediate and advanced tumor stages, but BCLC-A patients with alcohol-related disease demonstrated prolonged survival compared to patients with viral hepatitis.

CONCLUSION

Tumor stage at diagnosis of HCC is influenced by the etiology of underlying chronic liver disease and is more progressed in patients having a disease with alcoholic etiology. Majority of HCC patients are not diagnosed at a curable stage, which underlines the need for specialized care for all patients with chronic liver disease, independent of etiology and consequent adherence to current surveillance guidelines.

Natural history of untreatable hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective cohort study

AIM

To investigate the clinical course of untreatable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) identified at any stage and to identify factors associated with mortality.

METHODS

From January 1999 to December 2010, 320 out of 825 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of HCC and not appropriate for curative or palliative treatments were followed and managed with supportive therapy. Cirrhosis was diagnosed by histological or clinical features and liver function was evaluated according to Child-Pugh score. The diagnosis of HCC was performed by Ultra-Sound guided biopsy or by multiphasic contrast-enhanced computed tomography or gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Data were collected for each patient including all clinical, laboratory and imaging variables necessary for the outcome prediction staging systems considered. HCC staging was performed according Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) and Cancer of the Liver Italian Program scores. Follow-up time was defined as the number of months from the diagnosis of HCC to death. Prognostic baseline variables were analyzed by multivariate Cox analysis to identify the independent predictors of survival.

RESULTS

Seventy-five per cent of patients had hepatitis C. Ascites was present in 169 patients (53%), while hepatic encephalopathy was present in 49 patients (15%). The Child-Pugh score was class A in 105 patients (33%), class B in 142 patients (44%), and class C in 73 patients (23%). One hundred patients (31%) had macroscopic vascular invasion and/or extra-hepatic spread of the tumor. A single lesion > 10 cm was observed in 34 patients (11%), while multinodular HCC was present in 189 patients (59%). Thirty nine patients (12%) were BCLC early (A) stage, 55 (17%) were BCLC intermediate (B) stage, 124 (39%) were BCLC advanced (C) stage, and 102 (32%) were end-stage BCLC (D). At the time of this analysis (July 2011), 28 (9%) patients were still alive. Six (2%) patients who were lost during follow-up were censored at the last visit. The overall median survival was 6.8 mo, and the 1-year survival was 32%. The 1-year survival according to BCLC classes was 100%, 79%, 12% and 0%, for BCLC A, B, C and D, respectively. There was a significant difference in survival between each BCLC class. The median survival of patients of BCLC stages A, B, C and D was 33, 17.4, 6.9, and 1.8 mo, respectively (P < 0.05 for comparison between stages). The median survival of Child-Pugh A, B and C classes were 9.8 mo (range 6.4-13), 6.1 (range 4.9-7.3), and 3.7 (range 1.5-6), respectively (P < 0.05 for comparison between stages). By univariate analysis, the variables significantly associated to an increased liklihood of mortality were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS), presence of ascites, low level of albumin, elevated level of bilirubin, international normalized ratio (INR) and Log-[(α fetoprotein (AFP)]. At multivariate analysis, mortality was independently predicted by bad PS (P < 0.0001), high INR values (P = 0.0001) and elevated Log-(AFP) levels (P = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the heterogeneous behavior of untreated HCC. BCLC staging remains an important prognostic guide and may be important in decision-making for palliative treatment.

Sorafenib for non-selected patient population with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: efficacy and safety data according to liver function

OBJECTIVE

Sorafenib is the standard treatment of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, regardless of the liver functional reserve. We present a single institutional series of Child-Pugh A and Child-Pugh B patients treated with sorafenib with the aim to establish the efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients of daily clinical conditions and to compare these results between Child-Pugh A and Child-Pugh B patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 51 patients were treated with sorafenib 400 mg/12 h until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

RESULTS

The median progression-free survival and overall survival for the overall population were 3.5 and 8.2 months, respectively, with a 1-year survival rate of 27 %. Overall survival was significantly longer for patients Child-Pugh A compared with those with Child-Pugh B liver function (8.7 vs. 4.7 months, respectively). The most common adverse events were fatigue (62.7 %), diarrhea (58 %), hypertension (31.3 %), and hand-foot syndrome (31.3 %), and in most cases grade 1 or 2 according to the NCI-CTC 3.0. Grade 4 liver-related events occurred mainly in Child-Pugh B patients with decompensated cirrhosis at the time of sorafenib initiation (54.5 % of that group).

DISCUSSION

The benefit of sorafenib in Child-Pugh B patients, if exist, may be limited by frequent liver-related events, especially in decompensated patients, and then, toxicity and impact in quality of life should be carefully monitored.

Sorafenib in liver cancer

INTRODUCTION

With growing knowledge of the molecular pathway of carcinogenesis, targeted therapies have become the 'blue ocean' of cancer treatment. sorafenib is an oral multikinase inhibitor that targets Raf/mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) (Raf/MEK/ERK) and several tyrosine kinases (VEGFR-2, VEGFR-3, PDGFR-β) that has shown efficacy in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

AREAS COVERED

An updated summary of the preclinical and clinical experience with sorafenib in HCC is presented in this paper. Data are based on abstracts from international conferences and journal articles found in a PubMed search of literature published up to December 2011.

EXPERT OPINION

Based on favorable data from preclinical and clinical trials, sorafenib has been approved as a standard therapy in advanced HCC. However, further efforts to understand the additional roles of sorafenib in the treatment of HCC are still necessary. Data for sorafenib will guide the development of new drugs for the treatment of HCC.

Clinical course of sorafenib treatment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Sorafenib has been shown to improve survival of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, its tolerance in clinical practice has not been well evaluated, and whether sorafenib should be continued in cases of tumor progression or intolerance has not been established. The authors retrospectively assessed sorafenib tolerability, and evaluated the clinical course in patients who showed progression during sorafenib treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between March 2008 and July 2010, 80 patients with advanced HCC were treated with sorafenib.

RESULTS

With a median of 78.5 days of treatment, 15% discontinued sorafenib due to adverse events. The duration was significantly longer in patients with Child-Pugh class A liver function (233 ± 240 days) than in those with Child-Pugh class B (100 ± 136 days; p = 0.006). The overall progression rate was 53% (43/80), with a median time to progression of 105 days (95% confidence interval, 59-150 days). After progression, 14 patients received conservative care only (group 1), 14 continued sorafenib monotherapy (group 2), 6 changed to treatment without sorafenib (group 3) and 9 underwent additional treatment with concomitant sorafenib (group 4). Survival after progression was significantly better in groups 2, 3 and 4 than in group 1 (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Sorafenib was tolerable for most patients in clinical practice and may be continued in patients who show progression during sorafenib therapy. However, it was less well tolerated in patients with Child-Pugh class B liver function and should be used with caution in these patients.

Systematic review: the role of liver transplantation in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Liver transplantation offers a potential cure for this otherwise devastating disease. The selection of the most appropriate candidates is paramount in an era of graft shortage.

AIM

To review systematically the role of liver transplantation in the management of HCC in current clinical practice.

METHODS

An electronic literature search using PUBMED (1980-2010) was performed. Search terms included HCC, hepatoma, liver cancer, and liver transplantation.

RESULTS

Liver transplantation is a highly successful treatment for HCC, in patients within Milan criteria (MC), defined as a solitary tumour ≤50 mm in diameter or ≤3 tumours ≤30 mm in diameter in the absence of extra-hepatic or vascular spread. Other eligibility criteria for liver transplantation are also used in clinical practice, such as the University of California, San Francisco criteria, with outcomes comparable to MC. Loco-regional therapies have a role in the bridging treatment of HCC by minimising wait-list drop-out secondary to tumour progression. Beyond MC, encouraging results have been demonstrated for patients with down-staged tumours. Post-liver transplantation, there is no evidence to support a specific immunosuppressive regimen. In the context of an insufficient cadaveric donor pool to meet demand, the role of adult living donation may be increasingly important.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver transplantation offers a curative therapy for selected patients with HCC. The optimisation of eligibility criteria is paramount to ensure that maximum benefit is accrued. Although wait-list therapies have been incorporated into clinical practice, additional high quality data are required to support this strategy.

Pretreatment serum C-reactive protein level predicts poor prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

C-reactive protein (CRP) is known to be associated with poor prognosis in patients with various malignancies. We investigated the relationship between the pretreatment serum CRP level and survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in various stages of the disease. A cohort of 133 patients with newly diagnosed HCC was prospectively evaluated. The patients were divided into two groups: high-CRP group (n=27) with the pretreatment serum CRP level≧1.0 mg/dl and low-CRP group (n=106) with the CRP level<1.0 mg/dl. They were followed 22 months in average (1-69 months) and clinicopathological variables, and overall survivals between the two groups were compared at the end of the follow-up period. There was a significant difference between the two groups in aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, total serum bilirubin, albumin, α-fetoprotein level, maximal tumor diameter, frequency of vascular invasion and extrahepatic metastases. Patients in the high-CRP group had higher Child-Pugh scores, higher Cancer of the Liver Italian Program scores and higher Japan Integrated Staging scores than patients in the low-CRP group. The overall survival rates in the high-CRP group were significantly lower than those in the low-CRP group. Survival rates were similar in tumor stage and liver function-matched patients. On multivariate analysis, pretreatment serum CRP level was independently associated with overall survival. Our results demonstrate that the pretreatment serum CRP level is associated with tumor progression and reduced liver function and is an independent poor prognostic marker in patients with HCC.