Immune tolerance therapy in paediatric haemophiliacs with factor VIII inhibitors: 14 years follow-up

Incidence of inhibitors in haemophilia A patients--a review of recent studies of recombinant and plasma-derived factor VIII concentrates

The development of inhibitors to factor VIII or IX is the most serious complication of haemophilia therapy. While early surveys revealed inhibitor prevalences of 3.6-25%, recent studies, especially those using recombinant DNA-derived products, have prompted speculation as to whether ultrapurified products may cause a higher incidence of inhibitors. Although studies of ultrapure rFVIII in previously treated patients have not shown an increased inhibitor risk, in previously untreated patients (PUPs) with severe haemophilia A (factor VIII < 2%), cumulative incidences of approximately 30% have been reported. The majority of these inhibitors are low responders; many have disappeared spontaneously despite continued treatment with the study product (i.e. transient inhibitors), and were most probably detected as a consequence of frequent inhibitor testing. The mutation causing haemophilia has recently been shown to be a significant risk factor for developing an inhibitor; mutations leading to the absence of endogenous factor VIII protein (for example, large multidomain deletions, nonsense mutations, isochromosomal intron 22 inversions) are associated with the highest risk of inhibitor development. Furthermore, recent prospective studies of plasma-derived products reveal inhibitor incidences (i.e. 21-52%) that are comparable to those obtained with recombinant products. When comparing the incidences of high-responder inhibitors (> 10 BU) among recent prospectively studied severe haemophilia A cohorts (i.e. 11-41%), differences between plasma-derived and recombinant products cannot be discerned. New studies of either recombinant or plasma-derived products should consider all known parameters influencing inhibitor formation, thereby facilitating meaningful comparisons of inhibitor risk.

Tolerance induction using the Malmö treatment model 1982-1995

The ultimate goal in the treatment of haemophilia patients with inhibitors is to eradicate permanently the inhibitor and induce tolerance. Here we summarize our experience at the Malmö centre regarding tolerance induction according to the Malmö Treatment Model. The protocol includes immunoadsorption if needed, neutralization of inhibitor and replacement with factor concentrates, cyclophosphamide intravenously for 2 days (12-15 mg kg-1 bw) and then orally (2-3 mg kg-1 bw) for an additional 8-10 days and intravenous gammaglobulin daily at dosages of 0.4 g kg-1 bw for 5 days. This protocol has been applied in 23 haemophilia patients with inhibitors, 16 haemophilia A patients and seven haemophilia B patients. Altogether 36 attempts have been made to induce tolerance. Ten of the 16 haemophilia A (62.5%) and 6/7 patients with haemophilia B (86%) became tolerant after the treatment. The chances of success or failure are roughly equal, if the series is considered in a historical perspective. The data showed that the chances of success in tolerance induction with the Malmö protocol were best in those patients with low inhibitor titres, with relatively low historical inhibitory peak and with a long interval since the previous replacement therapy. This was especially true where no inflammatory state was present at the start or during tolerance induction. The advantage with this method compared to the high-dose regimen is that in the successful cases tolerance can be achieved within 3-4 weeks.

Hemophilia. A new approach to an old disease

The history of hemophilia diagnosis and therapy has been a turbulent one. We are coming full circle, back to the use of genetics as the main diagnostic tool for this disease. Therapeutically, the retroviruses that ravaged one generation of hemophiliac patients now may participate in the cure for the next generation. The hemophilia community hopes that the future of hemophilia care will follow a course guided by this modified quote from James Russell Lowell: "New times demand new measures, and men [and women]. As the world advances and in time outgrows the laws that in our fathers' [and mothers'] days were the best, doubtless after us some purer scheme will be shaped out by wiser man [and women] than we, made wiser by the steady growth of truth."

Hemophilia 1996. New approach to an old disease

The history of hemophilia diagnosis and therapy has been a turbulent one. We are coming full circle, back to the use of genetics as the main diagnostic tool for this disease. Therapeutically, the retroviruses that ravaged one generation of hemophiliac patients now may participate in the cure for the next generation. The hemophilia community hopes that the future of hemophilia care will follow a course guided by this modified quote from James Russell Lowell: "New times demand new measures, and men [and women]. As the world advances and in time outgrows the laws that in our fathers' [and mothers'] days were the best, doubtless after us some purer scheme will be shaped out by wiser men [and women] than we, made wiser by the steady growth of truth."