Double-blind and placebo-controlled study to assess efficacy and safety of a modified allergen extract of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus in allergic asthma

Detection of allergen composition and in vivo immunogenicity of depigmented allergoids of Betula alba

BACKGROUND

Chemical modification of allergen vaccines to reduce IgE binding improves safety while maintaining clinical efficacy. However, this also complicates the characterization of allergoids using techniques as for native allergen extracts.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to analyse the molecular size of Betula alba depigmented allergoids, conservation of major allergens in the allergoids and in vivo antibody response to immunization.

METHODS

The molecular size of depigmented allergoids was evaluated by high performance-size exclusion chromatography and light scattering techniques. Protein composition was compared with native extracts by capillary liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry based peptide mapping. Rabbits were immunized with depigmented allergoid of Betula pollen adsorbed onto aluminium hydroxide (Depigoid). IgG antibodies against individual allergens were determined by ELISA and immunoblot.

RESULTS

Depigmented allergoids contained a range of high molecular weight particles, approximately 60% of which had a molecular weight of 1-3 MDa. Peptide sequencing confirmed the preservation of five isoforms of Bet v 1, as well as Bet v 2, Bet v 6 and Bet v 7. Sera from immunized rabbits showed high levels of specific IgG to rBet v 1.0101 and rBet v 2.

CONCLUSIONS

The mean protein content was 544+/-106 microg per mg of freeze-dried material for depigmented allergoids and 434+/-71 for native extracts. They retain the capacity to induce specific IgG antibodies against individual allergens present in the native extract. These findings confirm the immunogenicity of depigmented allergoids and may explain why patients treated with these vaccines are protected against the native allergens. Analysis of molecular size and allergen content may be useful techniques for characterization and standardization of allergoid products.

The impact of GINA suggested drugs for the treatment of asthma on Health-Related Quality of Life: a GA(2)LEN review

Asthma represents a serious global health problem. People of all ages in countries throughout the world are affected by this chronic airway disorder that, when uncontrolled, can place severe limits on daily life and can even be fatal. Asthma cannot be removed, but asthmatic symptoms can be cured; as for many other chronic diseases, pharmacotherapy is important to reduce the risk of asthma-related mortality, decrease disability and improve symptoms and quality of life. The action of antiasthmatic drugs directly contributes to decrease symptoms severity, improve spirometric results, reduce airway hyperresponsiveness and prevent irreversible airway remodelling. Antiasthmatic therapy is necessary for long-term control of asthma symptoms. Asthma and antiasthmatic drugs can influence patient's quality of life: this is why healthcare systems have recently focused on research studies about Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) in asthmatic patients. Numerous validated questionnaires are available and many studies have been performed evaluating HRQL in people affected by asthma, thus testifying a great interest in this topic. The aims of the present review are to examine the scientific literature of the last 4 years (January 2004-December 2007) dealing with the impact of asthma treatments suggested by Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines on patients' quality of life, and to identify the unexplored or not fully investigated areas concerning this issue.

Comparison of the long-term efficacy of subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapies in perennial rhinitis

BACKGROUND

Both sublingual and subcutaneous immunotherapies have a documented clinical efficacy, but only a few comparative studies have been performed.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate and compare the long-term efficacies of subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy.

METHODS

One hundred and ninety-three patients with house dust mite allergies, out of an original total of 230, were treated with subcutaneous and sublingual house dust mite-specific immunotherapies for 3 years and also observed for 3 years after discontinuation of the treatment. The patients were randomized into 2 groups: the sublingual group (97 patients) and the subcutaneous group (96 patients). The therapy's success was evaluated using the symptom score, skin prick test results, and the nasal allergen challenge score. The patients were evaluated at the beginning of the study, at the end of years 1, 2, and 3, and also at the end of the 1st and 3rd years after discontinuation of the specific immunotherapy treatment.

RESULTS

Immunotherapy induced a significant improvement during the treatment and the follow-up period. We found a greater improvement in the subcutaneous group compared to the sublingual group when we looked at the comparative results of the total 6 years.

CONCLUSION

We suggest subcutaneous immunotherapy for patients with perennial allergic rhinitis due to the better results that were obtained during our study period. Nevertheless, sublingual immunotherapy is now accepted by WHO as a valid alternative to the subcutaneous route and should be used in all patients who require immunotherapy and do not accept the subcutaneous route of allergen administration.

Safety of immunotherapy with therapeutic vaccines containing depigmented and polymerized allergen extracts

BACKGROUND

The major complication of allergen immunotherapy is a severe reaction.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety of depigmented and glutaraldehyde-modified allergen extracts in a large group of patients undergoing immunotherapy treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Seven hundred sixty-six patients, having rhinoconjunctivitis and/or asthma, were entered in a prospective, multi-centre, observational cohort study, to evaluate the safety of immunotherapy with modified allergen vaccines. Patients were sensitized to mites and/or pollen and received a therapeutic vaccine containing depigmented and polymerized allergen extracts of mites and/or pollens adsorbed onto aluminium hydroxide. The schedule of administration consisted of a build-up phase of 4- to 6-weekly injections, followed by 12-monthly injections of the maintenance dose. Tolerance was assessed by recording all side reactions related to immunotherapy.

RESULTS

All patients completed the study. Fifty-four clinically relevant local reactions (43 immediate and 11 delayed) were observed (0.4% of injections). The systemic reactions were 34 in 12 patients. Six reactions were immediate (all of grade 2) and 28 delayed (18 of grade 1 in two patients, nine of grade 2 and one of grade 3). The systemic reactions of grade 2 or 3 occurred in 0.12% of the injections. All systemic reactions were mild and resolved spontaneously without the need for medication.

CONCLUSION

Specific immunotherapy using modified allergen vaccines is safe to treat allergic patients. The percentage of adverse reactions detected is lower than those reported in the literature with native-unmodified allergen extracts.

Allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma update: allergen immunotherapy

The Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma document was first published in 2001. Since then, new data on specific immunotherapy have appeared. This review is intended as an update to the original document. MedLine (2001 to June 2006) was searched with appropriate key words, and panelists were asked to identify further relevant articles. Randomized controlled trials were considered for the evaluation of efficacy. For the evaluation of safety and additional effects, studies with lower grades of evidence were included. The clinical efficacy of injection immunotherapy in rhinitis and asthma was confirmed, as well as the safety, provided that recommendations are followed. Studies have demonstrated the long-term efficacy and the preventive effect of immunotherapy in reducing the onset of new sensitizations. One randomized open trial demonstrated that in children with allergic rhinitis, injection immunotherapy may reduce the risk of developing asthma. There is strong evidence that sublingual immunotherapy is effective in allergic rhinitis in adults. Recent meta-analyses demonstrated its efficacy in allergic rhinitis in children and in asthma, although more definitive trials are required. Current data indicate that sublingual immunotherapy is safe and the rate of adverse reactions is not greater below 5 years of age. One randomized open trial showed that in children with allergic rhinitis, sublingual immunotherapy reduced the onset of asthma. Further studies are needed to identify the optimal maintenance dose and to elucidate the mechanism of action. Novel approaches for immunotherapy are currently under evaluation, including the use of adjuvants, peptides, and DNA-conjugated and recombinant allergens.

Mite immunotherapy

Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and D. farinae are the most common house dust mites and are among the most common sources of indoor allergens worldwide. These species are very common in humid regions, where most allergic individuals are sensitized to house dust mites. Specific immunotherapy with mite extracts has demonstrated clinical benefits in several double-blind, placebo-controlled trials that are included in recent reviews of subcutaneous immunotherapy, including pediatric and adult patients with rhinoconjunctivitis and or asthma. Most successful studies of mite immunotherapy have used native allergen extracts adsorbed onto aluminum hydroxide, or chemically modified mite-allergen extracts. Several studies have also shown efficacy using sublingual immunotherapy in pediatric and adult patients with asthma and/or rhinitis. Additionally, the efficacy of subcutaneous immunotherapy has been demonstrated in patients with atopic dermatitis, although more double-blind, placebo-controlled studies are needed. Based on several studies, it cannot be concluded that mite immunotherapy is more dangerous or safer than immunotherapy with grasses, epithelia, or animal epithelia. Because the delivery of high doses of allergen carries with it the risk for immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated events, several methods have been developed to reduce specific IgE binding to mite-allergen extracts. An important challenge for future mite immunotherapy modalities is the delivery of relatively high doses without a significant risk for severe reactions.

Double-blind study of tolerability and antibody production of unmodified and chemically modified allergen vaccines of Phleum pratense

BACKGROUND

The physicochemical modification of allergen extracts provides a chance for administering higher doses of allergen vaccines.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety of a chemically modified (depigmented-glutaraldehyde polymerized) therapeutic vaccine of Phleum pratense administered at doses that are 10 times higher than those used in clinical practice, in comparison with conventional doses of the corresponding non-modified alum-adsorbed vaccine.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The design of the study was randomized, double-blind, parallel and included two groups of patients. Twenty-three patients were treated weekly during nine visits for the build-up phase, followed by two weekly maintenance doses (a total of 11 injections per patient). Twelve patients received a vaccine containing the standardized unmodified extract, at a maximum concentration of 308.5 mcg of freeze dried material/mL (Group A). Eleven patients received a standardized modified allergen extract (Group B). The maximum dose used was 2400 mcg/mL. Safety was evaluated recording all adverse events. Skin test results and specific antibody levels were evaluated at the beginning and at the end of the study.

RESULTS

Group A patients experienced three local immediate (two clinically irrelevant and one with a diameter>5 cm) and 18 delayed reactions (15 irrelevant and three with a diameter>10 cm), while Group B experienced six local immediate and 12 delayed reactions (all clinically irrelevant). Nine Group A patients experienced 12 systemic reactions (one immediate of grade 1, one of grade 2; and one delayed of grade 1; four of grade 2 and three of grade 3), while Group B patients experienced one immediate systemic reaction of grades 1, and 1 delayed reaction of grade 1.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified extract of P. pratense is safe to treat sensitive patients, even at concentrations that are 10 times higher than those regularly administered in clinical practice. The majority of the local reactions were clinically irrelevant. No systemic reactions of grade 2, 3 or 4 were reported using the modified extract.

Safety of an ultra-rush immunotherapy build-up schedule with therapeutic vaccines containing depigmented and polymerized allergen extracts

BACKGROUND

Four administration schedules of immunotherapy have been reported: conventional, cluster, rush and ultra-rush.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety and the clinical advantage of using standardized modified allergen extracts in an ultra-rush protocol without premedication and/or hospitalization.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

One thousand and sixty-eight patients with rhinoconjunctivitis and/or asthma sensitized to mites and/or pollen were included in a prospective observational study. Patients received a therapeutic vaccine containing depigmented and glutaraldehyde-modified extracts (mites and/or pollens) adsorbed onto alum prescribed by a specialist. The schedule of administration consisted of injecting 0.2 and 0.3 ml of the vial of maximum concentration during the first day of immunotherapy, separated by a time interval of 30 min. All patients reached the maximum dose (0.5 ml) after 2 injections. Tolerance was assessed by recording all side reactions related to immunotherapy, classified according to the criteria of the EAACI.

RESULTS

The total number of injections was 2,136. All patients reached the maximum established dose on the 1st day. No premedication was used. Seven clinically relevant local reactions were recorded. The systemic reactions were 5 grade-1 (2 immediate and 3 delayed) and 3 delayed grade-2 reactions.

CONCLUSIONS

The therapeutic vaccines containing chemically modified extracts can be administered using an alternative ultra-rush schedule in an immunotherapy unit, reaching the maximum dose on the 1st day with 2 injections, without the need of premedication and/or hospitalization.