Hansen PO, Svensson P, Nielsen J, Arendt-Nielsen L, Jensen TS. Exteroceptive suppression of masseter muscle: assessment of two methods for quantitating suppression periods.
Acta Neurol Scand 1998;
97:204-13. [PMID:
9531439 DOI:
10.1111/j.1600-0404.1998.tb00638.x]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
The late exteroceptive suppression period (ES2) of the masseter muscle is conventionally quantified by a combination of measures of duration, amplitude, or mean activity. The combination of measures makes it difficult to compare ES2s obtained from different set-ups. An unbiased method for quantitating ES2 is introduced allowing ranking of ES2s. The introduced method is utilized to evaluate stimulus and recording conditions under which ES2 is maximal.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Fifteen male volunteers participated in 3 experiments designed to determine the effect of level of teeth clenching, stimulus intensity, and perceived pain intensity on the ES2.
RESULTS
Coefficients of variance (1 h/1 month) were: duration: 11%/43%, latency: 9%/12%, and magnitude of suppression: 11%/12%. A level of teeth clenching of 66% of maximal voluntary bite force, and a stimulus intensity below pain detection threshold was associated with maximal magnitude of suppression of ES2.
CONCLUSION
The introduced method is reproducible and allows ranking and stimulus-response estimations of ES2. It is suggested that ES2 does not reflect activity along the nociceptive pathways in the trigeminal region.
Collapse