Maturational pharmacokinetics of single intravenous bolus of propofol

Pharmacokinetic properties of conventional and double-dose sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine given as intermittent preventive treatment in infancy

Intermittent preventive treatment in infancy (IPTi) entails routine administration of antimalarial treatment doses at specified times in at-risk infants. Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SDX/PYR) is a combination that has been used as first-line IPTi. Because of limited pharmacokinetic data and suggestions that higher milligram/kilogram pediatric doses than recommended should be considered, we assessed SDX/PYR disposition, randomized to conventional (25/1.25 mg/kg of body weight) or double (50/2.5 mg/kg) dose, in 70 Papua New Guinean children aged 2 to 13 months. Blood samples were drawn at baseline, 28 days, and three time points randomly selected for each infant at 4 to 8 h or 2, 5, 7, 14, or 21 days. Plasma SDX, PYR, and N(4)-acetylsulfadoxine (NSX, the principal metabolite of SDX) were assayed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Using population modeling incorporating hepatic maturation and cystatin C-based renal function, two-compartment models provided best fits for PYR and SDX/NSX plasma concentration profiles. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 h to infinity (AUC(0-∞)) was greater with the double dose versus the conventional dose of PYR (4,915 versus 2,844 μg/day/liter) and SDX (2,434 versus 1,460 mg/day/liter). There was a 32% reduction in SDX relative bioavailability with the double dose but no evidence of dose-dependent metabolism. Terminal elimination half-lives (15.6 days for PYR, 9.1 days for SDX) were longer than previously reported. Both doses were well tolerated without changes in hemoglobin or hepatorenal function. Five children in the conventional and three in the double-dose group developed malaria during follow-up. These data support the potential use of double-dose SDX/PYR in infancy, but further studies should examine the influence of hepatorenal maturation in very young infants.

Propofol as an induction agent for endotracheal intubation can cause significant arterial hypotension in preterm neonates

BACKGROUND

Propofol is gaining increasing popularity as induction agent for pediatric endotracheal intubation. Recently, propofol has been described for the first time as induction agent for endotracheal intubation in preterm neonates. Propofol seemed to be efficient, safe and ideally suited for the INSURE (Intubation SURfactant Extubation) procedure in preterm neonates. The purpose of this study was to document intubating conditions, vital signs, extubation times and outcome in preterm neonates receiving propofol as induction agent for the INSURE procedure.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Preterm neonates with a gestational age of 29-32 weeks and respiratory distress were eligible for INSURE with propofol if their postnatal age was <8 h. Exclusion criteria were any kind of disease not allowing early extubation.

RESULTS

There were 13 inborn neonates enrolled for INSURE, mean gestational age was 30 weeks + 3 days, and mean birth weight was 1428 g (range 1170-1780 g). We stopped our observational study ahead of time as a result of significant cardiovascular side effects. Propofol generally offered good intubating conditions, but we encountered severe problems with arterial hypotension. A low propofol bolus of 1 mg kg(-1) caused a distinctive decline in mean arterial blood pressure from 38 mmHg (range 29-42 mmHg) prior premedication to 24 mmHg (22-40 mmHg) 10 min after propofol application.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience with propofol as induction agent for endotracheal intubation in preterm neonates reveals distinctive cardiovascular effects, which represent an important risk factor for serious complications of prematurity like intraventricular hemorrhage or periventricular leucomalacia. Propofol should be used with caution in very preterm neonates with respiratory distress during the first hours of life.

Pediatric models for adult target-controlled infusion pumps

Target-controlled infusion (TCI) pumps currently do not satisfactorily cater for the pediatric population, particularly for those under 5 years. Growth and development are two major aspects of children not readily apparent in adults, and these two aspects influence clearance (CL) and volume of distribution (V). In simple terms, V determines initial dose, and CL determines infusion rate at steady state. Three major covariates (size, age, and organ function) contribute to parameter variability in children. Size can be standardized for clearance in a 70-kg person using the allometric (3/4) power model. Remifentanil, a drug cleared by hydrolysis, can be modeled in all age groups by simple application of this model using a standardized clearance of 2790 ml x min(-1) for a 70-kg person. Allometry alone is insufficient to predict clearance in neonates and infants from adult parameters for most drugs used in anesthesia. The addition of a model describing maturation is required. The sigmoid Emax or Hill model has been found useful for describing this maturation process. Propofol maturation has been described with a mature clearance of 1.83 l x min(-1) x 70 kg(-1), a maturation half-time (TM(50)) of 44 weeks and a Hill coefficient of 4.9. Organ function also affects clearance, and propofol clearance is reduced in neonates and infants after cardiac surgery. Although pharmacokinetics (PK) in children is receiving increasing attention and is eminently programmable into a TCI device, pharmacodynamic (PD) measures in children remain poorly defined, partly because the depth of anesthesia monitoring are inadequate. Both PK and PD are necessary for safe use of TCI pumps.

TIVA, TCI, and pediatrics: where are we and where are we going?

The current role of TIVA in children is limited because of hardware limitations, and pharmacokinetic and monitoring issues. Nonetheless, the role of TIVA in children has been increasing in the past decade, in part because of surgical and medical indications. If TIVA is to become more widely used, it must be easy and simple to set up, without serious drawbacks and without added risks. Currently, many drugs destined for use with TIVA in children are off-label, and their pharmacology is poorly understood. Such off-label designations must be resolved if TIVA is to become more widely used. At the same time, many institutions have a limited number of infusion pumps, which creates a serious bottleneck and restriction on the use of TIVA.. If a true TIVA technique is used, i.v. access must be established before induction of anesthesia, which will require a means to establish i.v. access painlessly, e.g., using a topical local anesthetic. This is not a common practice in a number of jurisdictions but must be introduced if TIVA is to expand in its scope in children. Currently, I believe that we deliver a 'partial' TIVA technique in which TIVA occasionally follows an inhalational induction but in the future when the current obstacles have been resolved, I believe that we will be able practice a true TIVA technique ubiquitously in children.

Which model for propofol TCI in children

For several years, total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) has demonstrated many advantages that allow consideration of propofol anesthesia as an interesting alternative in pediatric anesthesia. TIVA in children requires calculation and validation of pharmacokinetic (PK) models specifically adapted to the pediatric population. Several PK models based on a 3-compartment approach have been proposed in children: all these models, which integrate only weight as covariable, show increased distribution volumes with a wide interindividual variability. However, as pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters are still debated in children, there is up to now, no PKPD model currently available for pediatric anesthesia. The particular importance to include physiological covariables, as size and age, to describe metabolic processes during growth and maturation in pediatric PKPD models is in agreement with recent allometric scaling works in children. The Schnider's model, a model described in adults that includes numerous covariables, may be adapted and more efficient than the classical pediatric model to describe propofol-PKPD relationship in children over 5 years. Whatever is the model, a pharmacodynamic feed back such as the bispectral index may be useful to counteract the interindividual variability in the pediatric population.

In vivo glucuronidation activity of drugs in neonates: extensive interindividual variability despite their young age

Compared with phase I isoenzymes, data on isoenzyme-specific phenotypic activity of uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) and its covariates in neonates are limited. In vivo observations on morphine, paracetamol (acetaminophen), and propofol disposition throughout childhood confirm the overall low-glucuronidation activity in neonates observed in in vitro studies. In addition to the phenotypic low-glucuronidation activity, in vivo observations of bilirubin (UGT1A1), morphine (UGT2B7), paracetamol (UGT1A6), and propofol (UGT1A9) glucuronidation in neonates display extensive interindividual variability, only in part explained by postmenstrual and postnatal age. Covariates like disease state characteristics (decreased morphine metabolism during therapeutic head cooling), genetic polymorphisms (UGT1A1 genetic variants and differences in bilirubin metabolism), or environmental factors (increased urinary excretion of paracetamol-glucuronide by repeated administration of paracetamol) further contribute to this variability. A focused approach to unveil covariates of the interindividual range is needed to improve our knowledge on drug disposition in early life.

Pediatric pharmacology in the first year of life

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Toxicity concerns and awareness during anesthesia issues continue to concern pediatric anesthesiologists. Most developmental pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and pharmacogenomic changes occur within the first year of life. Understanding these early changes can improve drug use in this cohort.

RECENT FINDINGS

Growth and development are two major aspects of children not readily apparent in adults. Clearance in the pediatric population should be investigated using models that describe size, maturation and organ function influences. Glucuronide conjugation (hepatic phase II process) mirrors glomerular filtration maturation over the first year of life. Phase 1 processes appear more rapid, and differences attributable to single nuclear polymorphisms may be obvious by the end of the 4-week neonatal period in term infants.Pharmacodynamic differences in infancy remain poorly defined, and neonatal pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analyses that might elucidate such differences are few, partly because of a paucity of effective pharmacodynamic measures.

SUMMARY

Mechanistic models create a framework for the study of pharmacokinetic changes in infancy. Understanding these changes allows a target concentration approach to therapy and potential for reduced toxicity. The target concentration may be undefined because of a paucity of effect measures.

Optimizing pediatric dosing: a developmental pharmacologic approach

Many physiologic differences between children and adults can result in age-related differences in pharmacokinetics. Understanding the effects of age on bioavailability, volume of distribution, protein binding, hepatic metabolic isoenzymes, and renal elimination can provide insight into optimizing doses for pediatric patients. We performed a search of English-language literature using the MEDLINE database regarding age and pharmacokinetics (1979-July 2008). We then evaluated the literature with an emphasis on drugs with one primary elimination pathway, such as renal clearance or a pathway involving a single metabolic isoenzyme. Our mechanistic-based analysis revealed that children need weight-corrected doses that are substantially higher than adult doses for drugs that are metabolically eliminated solely by the specific cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzymes CYP1A2, CYP2C9, and CYP3A4. In contrast, weight-corrected doses for drugs eliminated by renal excretion or metabolism involving CYP2C19, CYP2D6, N-acetyltransferase 2, or uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferases are similar in children and adults. In children, bioavailability of drugs with high first-pass metabolism is decreased for drugs metabolized by CYP1A2, CYP2C9, and CYP3A4. Limited data suggest that by age 5 years, bioavailability of drugs affected by efflux transporters should be equivalent to that of adults. Using a pharmacokinetics-based approach, rational predictions can be made for the effects of age on drugs that undergo similar pathways of elimination, even when specific pharmacokinetic data are limited or unavailable.

Developmental pharmacology: neonates are not just small adults

Neonatal drug dosing needs to be based on the physiological characteristics of the newborn and the pharmacokinetic parameters of the drug. Size-related changes can in part be modelled based on allometry and relates to the observation that metabolic rate relates to weight by a kg 0.75 trend. Until adult metabolic activity has been reached, ontogeny, i.e. isoenzyme-specific maturation and maturation of renal clearance also contributes to drug metabolism, making isoenzyme-specific documentation of maturation necessary. Changes in body composition and ontogeny are most prominent in neonates. The body fat content (/kg) is markedly lower and the body water content (/kg) is markedly higher in neonates. These findings have an impact on the distribution volume of both lipophilic and hydrophilic drugs. Drugs are cleared either by metabolism or elimination. While the first is mainly hepatic, the second route is mainly renal. Both hepatic metabolism and renal clearance display maturation in early life although other covariables (e.g. polymorphisms, co-administration of drugs, first pass metabolism, disease characteristics) further contribute to the interindividual variability in drug disposition. Documentation of these maturational processes based on in vivo 'case' studies is of value since these drug-specific observations can subsequently be extrapolated to other drugs which are either already being prescribed or even considered for use in neonates by the introduction of these observations in 'generic physiologically-based pharmacokinetic' models.