Functional disorders after rectal cancer resection: does a rehabilitation programme improve anal continence and quality of life?

Health related quality of life in colorectal cancer patients: state of the art

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer in males and the second in females with a progressive increase in prevalence in industrialized countries. The loss of health due to the cancer and/or the consequence of the treatment may result in psychophysical, functional and social impairment; all of these affect health-related quality of life (QoL).

Description

The most frequently CRC-specific QoL questionnaires is the FACT-C. QoL is not only important for the well-being of cancer patient but it also influences survival and response to therapy. Many studies investigated various determinants involved in the assessment of QoL in CRC, suggesting that symptoms, surgical procedures and the number of comorbidity significantly affected QoL.

Conclusion

Despite that CRC patients have a relatively good QoL compared with the general population, a wide range of intervention could be undertaken to improve their QoL. The finding of this review may be useful for cancer clinicians in taking therapy and surveillance-related decisions. However, future research should be directed to large-scale prospective studies using well validated QoL instruments to facilitate comparison of results.

Review of bowel dysfunction of rectal cancer patients during the first five years after sphincter-preserving surgery: a population in need of nursing attention

PURPOSE

The aim of the review was to summarize the longitudinal changes in bowel dysfunction among patients with rectal cancer within the first five years following sphincter-preserving resection.

METHODS

A series of literature searches were conducted on six English-language electronic databases. Articles published after 1990 were searched. A total of 29 articles (reporting 27 studies) was found.

RESULTS

Bowel dysfunction, including an alteration in the frequency of bowel movements, incontinence, abnormal sensations, and difficulties with evacuation, is reported among patients with rectal cancer within the first five years after sphincter-preserving resection. These problems are most frequent and severe within the first year, especially within the first six months, and stabilize after one year. Some of the problems may last for years.

CONCLUSION

Supportive care for bowel dysfunction is needed, and should include the provision of information and psychological support delivered in multiple steps. Oncology nurses can play an important role in providing supportive care for rectal cancer patients with bowel dysfunction.

Sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence and "low anterior resection syndrome" following neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

It was the aim of this prospective study to analyze both feasibility and effectiveness of sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence and "low anterior resection syndrome" following neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer.

METHODS

All patients who underwent sacral neuromdulation following neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer (preoperative radiochemotherapy, oncologic rectal resection with total mesorectal excision) were prospectively enrolled in the study. Only patients with failure of conservative treatment and without any evidence of residual or recurrent tumor disease were candidates for sacral neuromdulation which was performed by a two-stage procedure (diagnostic percutaneous test stimulation followed by definite implant). In addition to feasibility, primary end points included success (reduction of incontinent episodes), continence and defecation status (assessed by Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score and Altomare score), and quality of life (EQ-5D). Anal manometry was performed preoperative and at 12-month follow-up. Follow-up information was derived from clinical examination 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Nine patients (three females, six males) with a mean age of 61 years underwent sacral neuromodulation following neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer. Implantation rate was 100 %. No septic morbidity was observed. After a mean follow-up of 12 months, mean Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score was reduced from 18.2 to 6.0 (p < 0.01). Incontinence episodes were significantly reduced from 7 to 0.5 (per day) and 20 to 8 (per week). Fecal urgency, fragmented defecation, and soiling were improved or resolved in two thirds. Altomare score was significantly reduced from 21.0 to 9.3 (p < 0.01). Anorectal manometry did not correlate with clinical success. Quality of life was significantly improved (EQ-5D generic: 0.42 vs. 0.74, EQ-5D-VAS score: 20 vs. 90, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary results of sacral neuromodulation in patients with fecal incontinence and symptoms of "low anterior resection syndrome" are promising and enrich the therapeutic modalities if conservative management has failed.

Treatment options to improve anorectal function following rectal resection: a systematic review

AIM

Common problems after rectal resection are loose stools, faecal incontinence, increased frequency and evacuation difficulties, for which there are various therapeutic options. A systematic review was conducted to assess the outcome of treatment options aimed to improve anorectal function after rectal surgery.

METHOD

Publications including a therapeutic approach to improve anorectal function after rectal surgery were searched using the following databases: MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Pedro, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsychInfo and the Cochrane Library. The focus was on outcome parameters of symptomatic improvement of faecal incontinence, evaluation of defaecation and quality of life.

RESULTS

The degree of agreement on eligibility and methodological quality between reviewers calculated with kappa was 0.85. Fifteen studies were included. Treatment options included pelvic floor re-education (n=7), colonic irrigation (n=2) and sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) (n=6). Nine studies reported reduced incontinence scores and a decreased number of incontinent episodes. In 10 studies an improvement in resting and squeeze pressure was observed after treatment with pelvic floor re-education or SNS. Three studies reported improved quality of life after pelvic floor re-education. Significant improvement of the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale was found in three studies after SNS.

CONCLUSION

Conservative therapies such as pelvic floor re-education and colonic irrigation can improve anorectal function. SNS might be an effective solution in selected patients. However, methodologically qualitative studies are limited and randomized controlled trials are needed to draw evidence-based conclusions.