Review of current varicocelectomy techniques and their outcomes

Embolization of left spermatic vein in non-obstructive azoospermic men with varicocele: role of FSH to predict the appearance of ejaculated spermatozoa after treatment

PURPOSE

Varicocele repair in non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) was occasionally associated to ejaculated spermatozoa independently from clinical and laboratory measures. We performed a prospective study in infertile men affected by NOA and left side varicocele to find whether or not the appearance of ejaculated spermatozoa after varicocele repair is predicted by baseline measures.

METHODS

Patients with NOA and grade II, or grade III left side varicocele were submitted to hormone analysis and to scrotal color Doppler ultrasound (CDU). Azoospermia was confirmed in 23 patients aged 25-47 years who were than submitted to varicocele repair through a retrograde internal spermatic vein embolization. Patients were re-evaluated after 6 months.

RESULTS

Six months after varicocele repair 12 patients (52.2 %) were still azoospermic (Group 1) while 11 patients (47.8 %) reported ejaculated spermatozoa (Group 2) [sperm count: 1.3 × 10(6)/mL; 0.5 × 10(6)/mL-1.6 × 10(6)/mL (median 25th-75th centiles)]. Serum baseline FSH was lower in Group 2 compared to Group 1 (p = 0.012), while no differences between groups were revealed for all other clinical and laboratory parameters. ROC analysis indicated that baseline FSH level predicted the appearance of ejaculated spermatozoa after treatment [AUC = 0.811; 95 % Confidence Interval (CI) 0.6-0.9; p = 0.0029]. A cut-off level of FSH <10.06 mIU/mL identified 82.0 % of cases with ejaculated spermatozoa with a specificity of 81.8 % and a sensitivity of 83.3 %.

CONCLUSION

Selected patients with NOA may show ejaculated spermatozoa after a non-invasive repair of a left side varicocele, therefore avoiding testicular sperm extraction. Baseline serum FSH was a valuable predictor for ejaculated spermatozoa after treatment.

Evaluation and Management of the Adolescent Varicocele

PURPOSE

Varicocele is one of the most common genital conditions referred to pediatric urologists. Most adolescents with varicocele are asymptomatic and their fertility future (and surgery benefit) is largely unknown. This review assesses varicocele evaluation, management and indications for repair, as well as types and success of varicocelectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed on Embase™, PubMed® and Google Scholar™ for adolescent varicocele. Original research articles and relevant reviews were examined, and a synopsis of these data was generated for a comprehensive review of clinical adolescent varicocele management.

RESULTS

The prevalence of adolescent varicocele is similar to the adult population. While ultrasound is the most sensitive method for determining testicular volumes, orchidometer measurement may be adequate to gauge significant discordance. Significant hypotrophy of the affected testis with poor total testicular volume may indicate a testis at risk and warrant surgical repair. Similar findings have been noted with an associated high peak retrograde venous flow. Testicular hypotrophy often resolves following surgery but may also improve spontaneously if followed through adolescence. Continued scrotal pain despite adequate support or serial abnormal semen analysis in Tanner stage V boys is an indication for varicocelectomy. Artery and lymphatic sparing techniques (microscopic subinguinal or laparoscopic) are associated with the lowest risk of recurrence and complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Overtreatment and under treatment are medically and financially costly. Abnormal serial semen analysis with or without testicular hypotrophy is an indication for varicocele repair. If observation remains the treatment, followup with an adult urologist should be encouraged until paternity is achieved.

Microsurgical Varicocele Repair on Men with Grade III Lesions and Chronic Dull Scrotal Pain: A Pilot Study

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of microsurgical varicocele repair in patients with grade III lesions and chronic dull scrotal pain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was based on 8 patients with grade III left-sided varicocele and chronic dull scrotal pain for whom a microsurgical subinguinal varicocele repair was performed. The 1-year follow-up included pain assessment and scrotal examination.

RESULTS

Of the 8 patients, 7 (88%) reported complete resolution of pain with no palpable varicocele on scrotal examination. No cases of testicular atrophy or hydrocele formation were reported.

CONCLUSION

These results indicated that microsurgical varicocele repair may benefit patients with grade III lesions and chronic dull scrotal pain.

Single incision transumbilical laparoscopic varicocelectomy versus the conventional laparoscopic technique: A randomized clinical study

BACKGROUND

Varicocele is the most common correctable cause of infertility. We analyzed the outcomes of single incision laparoscopic varicocelectomy (SIL-V) in comparison with conventional transperitoneal varicocelectomy (CTL-V).

METHODS

Patients with clinically palpable varicocele treated by laparoscopic varicocelectomy were randomly allocated into two groups: SIL-V and CTL-V group. The primary outcome measures were improvement in semen parameters and resolution of testicular pain. Secondary outcome measures included operating time, postoperative pain scores, time to return to normal activity, patient satisfaction and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Eighty patients completed the study. No vascular or intestinal complications occurred during both procedures. All patients were discharged 24 h postoperatively. The parameters measuring the success of varicocelectomy had improved for the majority of patients with no significant difference between the two groups. There was significantly longer operating time in SIL-V group (44.6 ± 5.4 min) than in CTL-V group (41.3 ± 8.5 min) (P = 0.03). The difference in operating time was lost when bilateral procedures were compared (P = 0.21). The mean VAS scores for pain at 3, 24 and 48 h postoperatively were significantly lower in SIL-V group (P = 0.02, P = 0.03 and P < 0.001 respectively). Time to return to normal activity was significantly shorter in SIL-V (P < 0.001). Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in SIL-V group (P < 0.01). Postoperative complications were comparable in both groups.

CONCLUSION

SIL-V is a safe and effective straightforward alternative to the well-established and accepted CTL-V. The tendency toward decreased postoperative pain, rapid return to normal activity and the high patients' satisfaction rate regarding cosmetic results are potential benefits of SIL-V procedure.

CLINICAL TRIAL

(NCT02335385).

Microsurgical varicocelectomy with transfixing of the difficult-to-isolate periarterial vein using microsutures

OBJECTIVE

To address difficulty in isolating the adhered periarterial vein in microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy, we introduced the transfixing microsuture method as well as to evaluate the impact of this technical modification on the surgical success of varicocele repair.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 4 patients with a mean age of 31.5 years who underwent subinguinal varicocelectomy with transfixion of the difficult-to-isolate periarterial vein (a 9-0 transfixing microsuture was placed transversely through the periarterial vein as near to the adjacent border between the testicular artery and adherent vein as possible; then, it was knotted to nick or completely ligate the lumen.) The incidence of recurrence or persistence, postoperative hydrocele formation, sperm improvement, and symptom release was analyzed.

RESULTS

In 4 cases, the periarterial vein transfixing procedures were performed with a mean follow-up of 6 months. No postoperative recurrence or hydrocele was identified postoperatively. One patient reported no symptom improvement, but there was significant improvement in the symptoms and/or semen parameters in the other 3 patients. Postoperative ultrasonography evaluation revealed that there was no postoperative varicocele recurrence or persistence, no hydrocele formation, and no testicular atrophy.

CONCLUSION

When the adhered periarterial vein is difficult to isolate and ligate, transfixing the vein with a microsuture in microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy is a viable compromise that reduces the incidence of postoperative recurrence or persistence without serious complications.

Surgical retroperitoneoscopic and transperitoneoscopic access in varicocelectomy: duplex scan results in pediatric population

OBJECTIVE

This is a retrospective study to compare duplex scan results of laparoscopic Palomo's technique through retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approach for varicocelectomy in children. We statistically analyzed recurrence, testicular volume growth and complications.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Surgical intervention was performed utilizing transperitoneoscopic (group A) or retroperitoneoscopic access (group B). Duplex scan control was performed after 12 months (T1), after 2 years (T2) and the last one at 18 years old in most patients. Statistical analysis was performed using the t-test for parametric data. Differences in proportions were evaluated using χ2 or Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

We treated 120 children (age range 10-17 years) who presented an asymptomatic IV grade of reflux, Coolsaet 1, associated with a left testicular hypotrophy in 36.6% of the cases (44 patients). No post-operative complications were verified. Duplex scan exam showed an increase of left testicular growth in both groups, with complete hypotrophy disappear in patients in both groups after 24 months. Hydrocele, diagnosed clinically and confirmed with duplex scan, was the most frequent post-operative complication (22/120 cases; 18.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed the importance of duplex scan at all steps of this vascular pathology in children, and that there is no significantly difference in results between the two surgical techniques except for hydrocele in transperitoneoscopic access.

Laparoscopic orchiopexy and varicocelectomy: is there really an advantage?

The role of laparoscopy in the case of nonpalpable cryptorchidism is both diagnostic and therapeutic. Laparoscopic orchiopexy for nonpalpable testes in the pediatric population has become the preferred surgical approach among pediatric urologists over the last 20 years. In contrast, laparoscopic varicocelectomy is considered one of several possible approaches to the treatment of a varicocele in an adolescent; however, it has many challengers and it has not gained universal acceptance as the gold standard. This article reviews the published evidence regarding these surgical techniques.

Effect of varicocelectomy on male infertility

Varicocele is the most common cause of male infertility and is generally correctable or at least improvable by various surgical and radiologic techniques. Therefore, it seems simple and reasonable that varicocele should be treated in infertile men with varicocele. However, the role of varicocele repair for the treatment of subfertile men has been questioned during the past decades. Although varicocele repair can induce improvement of semen quality, the obvious benefit of spontaneous pregnancy has not been shown through several meta-analyses. Recently, a well-designed randomized clinical trial was introduced, and, subsequently, a novel meta-analysis was published. The results of these studies advocate that varicocele repair be regarded as a standard treatment modality in infertile men with clinical varicocele and abnormal semen parameters, which is also supported by current clinical guidelines. Microsurgical varicocelectomy has been regarded as the gold standard compared to other surgical techniques and radiological management in terms of the recurrence rate and the pregnancy rate. However, none of the methods has been proven through well-designed clinical trials to be superior to the others in the ability to improve fertility. Accordingly, high-quality data from well-designed studies are needed to resolve unanswered questions and update current knowledge. Upcoming trials should be designed to define the best technique and also to define how to select the best candidates who will benefit from varicocele repair.

Cost-effectiveness analysis reveals microsurgical varicocele repair is superior to percutaneous embolization in the treatment of male infertility

INTRODUCTION

Varicoceles are a common cause of male infertility; repair can be accomplished using either surgical or radiological means. We compare the cost-effectiveness of the gold standard, the microsurgical varicocele repair (MV), to the options of a nonmicrosurgical approach (NMV) and percutaneous embolization (PE) to manage varicocele-associated infertility.

METHODS

A Markov decision-analysis model was developed to estimate costs and pregnancy rates. Within the model, recurrences following MV and NMV were re-treated with PE and recurrences following PE were treated with repeat PE, MV or NMV. Pregnancy and recurrence rates were based on the literature, while costs were obtained from institutional and government supplied data. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity-analyses were performed to determine the effects of the various parameters on model outcomes.

RESULTS

Primary treatment with MV was the most cost-effective strategy at $5402 CAD (Canadian)/pregnancy. Primary treatment with NMV was the least costly approach, but it also yielded the fewest pregnancies. Primary treatment with PE was the least cost-effective strategy costing about $7300 CAD/pregnancy. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis reinforced MV as the most cost-effective strategy at a willingness-to-pay threshold of >$4100 CAD/pregnancy.

CONCLUSIONS

MV yielded the most pregnancies at acceptable levels of incremental costs. As such, it is the preferred primary treatment strategy for varicocele-associated infertility. Treatment with PE was the least cost-effective approach and, as such, is best used only in cases of surgical failure.

Loupe-assisted versus microscopic varicocelectomy: is there an intraoperative anatomic difference?

The aim of this study was to compare the intraoperative difference in anatomic details between loupe-assisted and microscopic varicocelectomy within the same spermatic cord. Between April 2011 and August 2011, 26 men with 33 sides containing grade 2-3 varicocele were enrolled in this study. First, one surgeon performed the open inguinal varicocelectomy under × 3.5 loupe magnification. The presumed vascular channels and lymphatics were isolated and marked without ligation. Another surgeon then microsurgically dissected and checked the same spermatic cord using an operating microscope to judge the results in terms of the ligation of the internal spermatic veins and the preservation of the arteries and lymphatics. There were significant differences in the average number of internal spermatic arteries (1.51 vs 0.97), internal spermatic veins (5.70 vs 4.39) and lymphatics (3.52 vs 1.61) between the microscope and loupe-assisted procedures (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, respectively). Meanwhile, in varicocele repair with loupe magnification, an average of 1.30 ± 1.07 (43/33) internal spermatic veins per side were missed, among the overlooked veins, 1.12 ± 0.93 (37/33) were adhered to the preserved testicular artery, as well as 0.55 ± 0.79 lymphatics and 0.36 ± 0.55 arteries that were to be ligated. In conclusion, microscopic varicocelectomy could preserve more internal spermatic arteries and lymphatics and could ligate more veins than the loupe-assisted procedure. To some degree, loupe magnification is inadequate for the reliable identification and dissection of the tiny vessels of the spermatic cord, as most of the overlooked veins were adhered to the preserved testicular artery.

[Scrotal space-occupying lesions]

Palpable scrotal masses are common scenarios in any clinical practice. These tumors can be painful or painless, can be intratesticular or extratesticular and be cystic or solid. The distinction between benign and malignant tumors is of utmost importance to enable an adequate and differentiated therapy of patients. In clinical diagnostics besides the medical history, examination of the inguinoscrotal region, laboratory diagnostics and ultrasound examination of the inguinoscrotal area play a decisive role. During the last few years the increased use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound has helped clinicians in differentiating scrotal tumors. Malignant tumors are of particular importance because this entity is the most frequent malignant disease among younger men and according to the Robert Koch Institute there are approximately 3900 new patients in Germany each year (Robert Koch Institute, Krebs in Deutschland 2007/2008 and 2012).

Microsurgical intermediate subinguinal varicocelectomy

This study was conducted to introduce a simple modification that can facilitate microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy (MSV) especially for surgeons inexperienced in microsurgical technique. A single surgeon performed microsurgical intermediate subinguinal varicocelectomy (MISV) on 52 patients with 61 cases between September 2010 and August 2012. Patient age, varicocele grade, operation time, intraoperative findings, postoperative complications, and 3-month follow-up results were analyzed. Patient mean age was 28 years (range, 15-69 years), and there were 9 bilateral cases. The mean operative time was 51 minutes (range, 34-109 minutes). We compared the first 31 cases to the second 30 cases, to assess investigator experience on operating times. The mean number of ligated veins was 5 (range, 3-10) in internal spermatic vein, 1 (range, 0-4) in external spermatic vein, and 1 (range, 0-3) in gubernacular vein. In 28 patients, the average postoperative sperm concentration at the 3-month follow-up was significantly higher than the preoperative sperm concentration (28.5±18.2×10(6)/mL versus 10.5±23.0×10(6)/mL; P=0.003). Mean motility improved after MSIV (65.7%±18.2% versus 47.2%±21.7%; P=0.004). In conclusion, MISV appears comparable with MSV in terms of the high success rate, low complication rate, and low postoperative pain; and it can be easily accomplished by inexperienced surgeons.

Impact of internal spermatic artery preservation during laparoscopic varicocelectomy on recurrence and the catch-up growth rate in adolescents

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effectiveness of laparoscopic varicocelectomy (LV) in adolescents with varicocele and analyze the impact of internal spermatic artery (ISA) preservation on surgical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data on 92 adolescents with left varicocele who underwent LV between December 1998 and January 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. The mean age of the patients was 13.2 ± 2.1 years. Age, grade of disease, number of ligation veins, recurrence rates, and catch-up growth were analyzed in patients who underwent ISA preservation and ligation. The median duration of the follow-up was 21 months.

RESULTS

ISA preservation was performed on 50 patients (54%). There were no significant inter-group differences in terms of age, varicocele grade, number of ligation veins, and catch-up growth (93% vs. 90%). The patients who received artery preservation demonstrated a higher recurrence rate (22%) than those who received artery ligation (5%; p = 0.032). Among 13 patients who had persistent or recurrent varicocele, nine were treated with embolization and one was treated with magnification-assisted subinguinal varicocelectomy. None of these 10 patients demonstrated recurrence or testicular atrophy.

CONCLUSIONS

LV with ISA ligation can reduce the recurrence rate and results in the same catch-up growth rate in comparison with LV with ISA preservation.

Is semen analysis necessary for varicocele patients in their early 20s?

PURPOSE

To determine whether it is necessary to analyze the semen of varicocele patients in their early 20s who are not complaining of infertility.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data was collected retrospectively from 128 men with varicocele with no complaint of infertility, but with complaints of pain/discomfort or a mass/swelling during a 4-year period beginning in January 2009. The varicocele cases were matched 4 : 1 by age to 32 hemospermia controls.

RESULTS

The median patient age was 22.0 years in the case group and 24.0 years in the control group. The median values of the percentage of normal motility, normal morphology, and density in the case group were 42.5%, 40.0%, and 51.0×10(6)/mL, respectively. The median serum testosterone level was 4.2 ng/mL and 7.0% of the total patients had low serum testosterone levels in the case group. The number of patients with asthenospermia (17.2%), oligospermia (10.9%), and teratospermia (5.5%), and those with at least one abnormal semen parameter (19.5%) was significantly higher in the case group than the control group. The median values of the motility, morphology, and density of the case group were significantly lower than those of the control group. The multivariate analysis showed that patient characteristics (age, presence of pain, duration of symptoms, and grade of varicocele) cannot help to predict abnormal semen parameters (asthenospermia, oligospermia, teratospermia, or cases of at least 1 abnormal semen parameter) or serum testosterone levels <3.0 ng/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

Semen analysis is required as a screening test for semen abnormalities regardless of the chief complaint in varicocele patients in their early 20s.

The incidence of Fever after subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy

PURPOSE

In the present study, we aimed to identify the incidence of fever in patients after subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy and to evaluate the clinical factors associated with the occurrence of the fever.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the cases of patients who underwent subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy (group A) under spinal anesthesia. In addition, we reviewed the cases of patients who underwent microsurgical vasovasostomy under spinal anesthesia as a control group (group B). The incidence of fever in each group was compared. We investigated the clinical factors influencing the occurrence of fever in the patients of group A.

RESULTS

The incidence of fever in group A was significantly higher than that in group B (32.5% [53/163] vs. 0.4% [1/284]; p<0.001). Clinical factors such as age, varicocele grade, weight, height, operation time, number of ligated veins, usage of immediate postoperative analgesics, presence of postoperative hematoma, and duration of hospital stay were not significantly associated with the occurrence of fever.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that one-third of the patients developed transient fever after subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy, and therefore, this information should be provided during preoperative counseling.

Varicocele: How this condition and its management affects men's health

Varicocele is a relatively common condition that can impact men’s health in various ways. Unfortunately, its prevalence and the availability of various different methods of repairing it might lead to unnecessary treatment. An understanding of the various ways that this condition can impact men’s health is necessary in order to manage it appropriately. At present, there is substantial evidence to support varicocele repair in men who present with infertility, abnormal semen parameters, clinical varicocele and a female partner with normal fertility (or one with a potentially correctable abnormality). Varicocele repair appears to improve seminal fluid quality and might improve pregnancy rates. It might also have a role in managing men with non-obstructive azoospermia. Varicocele can also be a cause of scrotal pain that is usually of a dull character. Varicocele repair is an effective method of managing this type of pain, especially once proper measures have been taken to exclude other possible causes of orchalgia. Conservative measures are generally not effective in managing varicocele-related scrotal pain. There is growing evidence to suggest that varicocele repair might have a role in improving the serum testosterone level in men with hypogonadism, especially in the subfertile population. Well-designed prospective studies are needed to support the utilization of varicocele repair in managing these patients, as well as in preventing testicular dysfunction on a prophylactic basis.

Multiple determinations of sperm DNA fragmentation show that varicocelectomy is not indicated for infertile patients with subclinical varicocele

Varicocele is one of the most common causes of low semen quality, which is reflected in high percentages of sperm cells with fragmented DNA. While varicocelectomy is usually performed to ameliorate a patient's fertility, its impact on sperm DNA integrity in the case of subclinical varicocele is poorly documented. In this study, multiple DNA fragmentation analyses (TUNEL, SCD, and SCSA) were performed on semen samples from sixty infertile patients with varicocele (15 clinical varicoceles, 19 clinical varicoceles after surgical treatment, 16 subclinical varicoceles, and 10 subclinical varicoceles after surgical treatment). TUNEL, SCD, and SCSA assays all showed substantial sperm DNA fragmentation levels that were comparable between subclinical and clinical varicocele patients. Importantly, varicocelectomy did improve sperm quality in patients with clinical varicocele; however, this was not the case in patients with subclinical varicocele. In summary, although infertile patients with clinical and subclinical varicocele have similar sperm DNA quality, varicocelectomy should only be advised for patients with clinical varicocele.

Role of varicocele repair for male infertility in the era of assisted reproductive technologies

Varicocele is an abnormal condition characterized by dilatation of the pampiniform plexus veins draining the testis and is present in 15 % of men. Varicoceles have an adverse effect on spermatogenesis and are the most common cause of male infertility. Approximately 35 % of infertile men and more than 70 % of men with secondary infertility were reported to have varicoceles. Although data on methods of varicocele repair are accumulating, there remains controversy regarding the indications and techniques for varicocele repair. In addition, the role of varicocele repair in this era of assisted reproductive technologies continues to be debated. In this study, we performed a comprehensive PubMed search in order to review the current status of varicocele repair for male infertility. We reviewed English-language studies published from 1992 through 2013. After reviewing the articles, we identified a recent meta-analysis of four randomized controlled trials, which found that varicocele repair for oligozoospermic men was associated with better pregnancy rates as compared with observation. Our review of prospective studies showed that all semen parameters, including sperm concentration, motility, and progressive motility, were significantly improved after varicocele repair. We also summarize the findings of recent studies reporting beneficial effects of varicocele repair, i.e., decreased oxidative stress and sperm DNA fragmentation after varicocele repair and superior cost effectiveness versus in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection alone, which may be important in the era of assisted reproductive technologies. Varicocele repair is a widespread, well-established procedure that can improve semen parameters in men with infertility. The effect of such treatment on the pregnancy rate is unclear because evidence is limited due to difficulties in recruiting patients for studies. Among the repair techniques, microsurgical repair using a subinguinal approach is potentially the best practice, although this procedure requires training in microsurgery. All these topics require further research in studies with sufficient patient enrollment and follow-up.

Children and adults varicocele: diagnostic issues and therapeutical strategies

Varicocele is defined as abnormally dilated scrotal veins. It is present in 15 % of normal males and in 40 % of males with infertility. This disorder is a challenge for the physicians involved in the diagnosis and treatment, as the pathophysiology of varicocele is not yet completely understood. For this reason, accurate diagnostic criteria and clear indications for treatment in asymptomatic adolescents or adults with clinical or subclinical varicocele are still not defined. Ultrasonography (US) is considered the best method for calculating the volume of the testicles, measuring vein diameter and monitoring the growth of the testis in adolescent patients. Color-Doppler US is the method of choice for detecting spermatic vein reflux and for classifying the grade of varicocele. Various classification systems have been published with recommendations on how to perform US imaging of the scrotum. Currently, color-Doppler US and spectral analysis are the most effective, non-invasive diagnostic procedures as they allow detection of subclinical varicocele associated with infertility. Various techniques are used in the treatment of varicocele including open surgery, laparoscopic procedures and interventional radiology. However, there is no consensus among physicians on which technique is the most effective in terms of outcome and complication rates. This review shows that color-Doppler US is currently the most widely employed diagnostic method for detection and classification of varicocele caused by venous reflux, as it is reliable and easily performed. The review also highlights the role of varicocelectomy in the management of adult male infertility.

Impact of surgical varicocele repair on pregnancy rate in subfertile men with clinical varicocele and impaired semen quality: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Purpose

To elucidate the impact of surgical varicocele repair on the pregnancy rate through new meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials that compared surgical varicocele repair and observation.

Materials and Methods

The PubMed and Embase online databases were searched for studies released before December 2012. References were manually reviewed, and two researchers independently extracted the data. To assess the quality of the studies, the Cochrane risk of bias as a quality assessment tool for randomized controlled trials was applied.

Results

Seven randomized clinical trials were included in our meta-analyses, all of which compared pregnancy outcomes between surgical varicocele repair and control. There were differences in enrollment criteria among the studies. Four studies included patients with clinical varicocele, but three studies enrolled patients with subclinical varicocele. Meanwhile, four trials enrolled patients with impaired semen quality only, but the other three trials did not. In a meta-analysis of all seven trials, a forest plot using the random-effects model showed an odds ratio (OR) of 1.90 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77 to 4.66; p=0.1621). However, for subanalysis of three studies that included patients with clinical varicocele and abnormal semen parameters, the fixed-effects pooled OR was significant (OR, 4.15; 95% CI, 2.31 to 7.45; p<0.001), favoring varicocelectomy.

Conclusions

Varicocelectomy for male subfertility is proven effective in men with clinical varicocele and impaired semen quality. Therefore, surgical repair should be offered as the first-line treatment of clinical varicocele in subfertile men.

Predictive factors of successful redo varicocelectomy in infertile patients with recurrent varicocele

To examine the predictive factors of successful redo varicocelectomy in infertile patients with recurrent varicocele, we made a retrospective study. Twenty-one patients who had improved quality of spermatozoon 6 months after RV were designated as group 1, those with no improvement as group 2 (17 subjects) and those who received close surveillance as group 3 (10 patients) were recruited. The predictive factors included were time to recurrent varicocele; semen quality; testicular volume; number of ligated veins; body mass index; serum levels of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinising hormone and testosterone; scrotal temperature; and peak retrograde flow (PRF) and maximal vein diameter (MVD) by colour Doppler ultrasound. The quality of spermatozoon improved significantly 6 months after RV in group 1 patients (21, 55.3%), and no improvement in group 2 and 3 patients. Patients in group 1 also had significantly lower FSH and PRF, longer time to recurrent varicocele, higher number of ligated veins and larger testicular volume than the group 2 (17, 44.7%) and group 3 patients. The significant predictive factors of successful RV were lower FSH and PRF; longer time to recurrent varicocele; and larger testicular volume preoperatively and a higher number of ligated veins during redo varicocelectomy.

Current issues in varicocele management: a review

The most common cause of male infertility is varicocele, and varicocele is the most common correctable cause of male factor infertility. In this article we reviewed the concept of varicocele in terms of its diagnosis, method of treatment, indications for treatment, treatment outcomes, and prognostic factors. Physical examination is an essential diagnostic tool in the evaluation of a patient with a varicocele. However, as it depends on subjective findings, standardization of the physical examination method is needed. Various methods for treatment of varicocele exist, including open surgical, laparoscopic, microscopic surgical, and radiologic treatment such as embolization. Among these treatment approaches, microscopic inguinal or subinguinal varicocelectomy has superior outcomes, with a low complication rate. The influence of the treatment of varicocele on fertility is still a controversial issue and a difficult question to address, because there are limitations to performing a randomized control study, and previous studies had a heterogeneity of subjects and high dropout rate. However, there is robust evidence that varicocelectomy improves semen parameters as a surrogate marker of the potential for fertility. To date, general indications for treatment of varicocele are limited in patients with proven infertility, clinical palpable varicocele, and abnormal semen characteristics. Recently, it was shown that some symptoms other than infertility could be an indication for varicocelectomy because these symptoms are frequently related to deterioration of semen parameters. Varicocele in the adolescent presents a more difficult decision regarding whether to treat. A testicular size discrepancy of more than 20% is helpful for treatment decisions. Various prognostic factors were noted in several studies without, however, a consistent consensus.

Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) varicocelectomy with reusable components: comparison with the conventional laparoscopic technique

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare laparoendoscopic single-site varicocelectomy (LESSV) with multiport laparoscopic varicocelectomy (MLV) in terms of intraoperative parameters and postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study investigated 10 male adolescents and 89 adults who underwent either LESSV or MLV at the authors' center. The reusable X-Cone single port was inserted transumbilically. A 5-mm 30° telescope was used together with a straight and a prebent laparoscopic instrument. The MLV procedure was performed using two 5-mm ports and one 10-mm port.

RESULTS

Between January 2009 and November 2012, 20 patients underwent LESSV and 79 patients underwent MLV. The demographic data were comparable between the two groups. The mean operating time was 59.1 ± 15.5 min for LESSV and 51.2 ± 14.4 min for MLV (P = 0.04). In the LESSV group, no conversion to MLV was necessary. The hospital stay was 1.6 ± 0.7 days in the LESSV group versus 1.8 ± 0.5 days in the MLV group (P = 0.17). The postoperative pain scores did differ between the two groups. By day 2, significantly more patients in the LESSV group than in the MLV group fully recovered their normal physical activity (P = 0.02). Comparison of pre- and postoperative values showed relief of testicular pain and improvement of semen parameters for the majority of the patients. The overall incidence of complications was distributed equally between the two groups as follows: paresthesia of the upper thigh (8 %), wound infection (5 %), epididymitis (3 %) and hydrocele (4 %). All the patients in the LESSV group were fully satisfied with their cosmetic results compared with only 76 % of the patients in the MLV group (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The LESSV procedure performed with the reusable X-Cone is as safe and efficient as MLV. After LESSV, the parameters measuring postoperative patient satisfaction are significantly improved. Given its reusable components, including prebent laparoscopic instruments, the X-Cone platform is a cost-effective alternative to disposable or homemade single ports.

The role of varicocele treatment in the management of non-obstructive azoospermia

The literature on male reproductive medicine is continually expanding, especially regarding the diagnosis and treatment of infertility due to non-obstructive azoospermia. The advent of in vitro fertilization with intracytoplasmic sperm injection has dramatically improved the treatment of male infertility due to nonobstructive azoospermia. Assisted reproduction using testicular spermatozoa has become a treatment of hope for men previously thought to be incapable of fathering a child due to testicular failure. In addition, numerous studies on non-obstructive azoospermia have reported that varicocelectomy not only can induce spermatogenesis but can also increase the sperm retrieval rate; however, the value of varicocelectomy in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia still remains controversial. The purpose of this review is to present an overview of the current status of varicocele repair in men with non-obstructive azoospermia.

Insight into oxidative stress in varicocele-associated male infertility: part 2

Varicocele, the leading cause of male infertility, can impair spermatogenesis through several pathophysiological mechanisms. Of these, current evidence suggests that oxidative stress is the central element contributing to infertility in men with varicocele, to which the testis responds by way of heat stress, ischaemia or production of vasodilators, such as nitric oxide. Surgical varicocele repair (varicocelectomy) is beneficial not only for alleviating oxidative stress-associated infertility, but also for preventing and protecting against the progressive character of varicocele and its consequent upregulations of systemic oxidative stress. However, antioxidant therapy in infertile men with surgically treated and those with untreated varicocele is poorly studied, and well-designed trials are needed.

Macroscopic and microsurgical varicocelectomy: what's the intraoperative difference?

PURPOSE

Many authors reported that microsurgical varicocelectomy was among the best treatment modalities for varicocele. However, the difference in intraoperative anatomic detail between macroscopic and microsurgical varicocele repair in the same spermatic cord has not been critically discussed.

METHODS

Between August 2010 and February 2011, 32 men with 42 sides' grade 2-3 varicocele were enrolled in this study. One surgeon firstly mimicked the modified open varicocelectomy by identifying, isolating, and marking the presumed internal spermatic veins, lymphatics, and arteries. Another surgeon then checked the same spermatic cord using operating microscope to investigate the number of missed veins, to be ligated lymphatics and arteries in the "imitative" open varicocelectomy.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in the average number of internal spermatic arteries (1.67 vs. 0.91), internal spermatic veins (6.45 vs. 4.31), and lymphatics (2.93 vs. 1.17) between microscopic and macroscopic procedure (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, respectively). Meanwhile, an average of 2.14 ± 1.26 internal spermatic veins was missed; among them, 1.63 ± 1.32 internal spermatic veins adherent to the preserved testicular artery were overlooked. The number of 0.69 ± 0.84 lymphatics and 0.74 ± 0.74 arteries were to be ligated in "macroscopic varicocelectomy." A number of 1.07 ± 1.11 lymphatics were neither identified nor ligated. In addition, in 2 cases, the vasal vessels of the vas deferens were to be ligated at macroscopic procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Microsurgical varicocelectomy could preserve more internal spermatic arteries and lymphatic and ligate more veins which may interpret the superiority of microsurgical varicocele repair.

Varicocele surgery: 10 years of experience in two pediatric surgical centers

AIM

The study was designed to compare recurrence rates and complications after laparoscopic versus open varicocele surgery in children.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A retrospective case-note review of all varicocele surgery over a 10-year period (April 1999-March 2009) in two pediatric surgical centers was performed. Multivariate analysis using logistic regression was performed using SPSS Statistics version 18 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients had varicocele surgery during the study period. The median age at surgery was 14 years (range, 11-16 years). Most children had left-sided Grade 2 varicocele. Twenty-five (68%) primary procedures were laparoscopic (17 artery-sparing), and 12 (32%) procedures were open (9 artery-sparing). Six (16%) children had recurrence, and 6 (16%) had postoperative hydrocele. Recurrence rates after laparoscopic (16%) and open (17%) surgery were similar. Increasing age significantly decreased recurrence (odds ratio, 0.373; 95% confidence interval 0.161-0.862; P = .021). Although laparoscopy was associated with higher rates of postoperative hydrocele (odds ratio, 2.817; 95% confidence interval, 0.035-3.595; P = .380) and artery-sparing ligation was associated with higher rates of recurrence (odds ratio, 2.667; 95% confidence interval, 0.022-4.235; P = .787), these associations were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The best results of varicocele surgery in terms of recurrence and postoperative hydrocele were achieved by open mass ligation; however, larger prospective studies are warranted.

A critical appraisal on the role of varicocele in male infertility

Varicocele is a major cause of male infertility, as it may impair spermatogenesis through several distinct physiopathological mechanisms. With the recent advances in biomolecular techniques and the development of novel sperm functional tests, it has been possible to better understand the mechanisms involved in testicular damage provoked by varicocele and, therefore, propose optimized ways to prevent and/or reverse them. Up to now, there is still controversy involving the true benefit of varicocele repair in subfertile men as well as in certain specific situations such as concomitant contralateral subclinical varicocele or associated nonobstructive azoospermia. Also, with the continued development of assisted reproductive technology new issues and questions are emerging regarding the role of varicocelectomy in this context. This paper reviews the most recent data available on the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of varicocele with regard to male infertility.

Surgical techniques for the management of male infertility

Evaluation and surgical treatment of male infertility has evolved and expanded, now leading to more precise diagnoses and tailored treatments with diminished morbidity and greater success. Surgeries for male infertility are divided into four major categories: (i) diagnostic surgery; (ii) surgery to improve sperm production; (iii) surgery to improve sperm delivery; and (iv) surgery to retrieve sperm for use with in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF-ICSI). While today we are more successful than ever in treating male infertility, pregnancy is still not always achieved likely due to factors that remain poorly understood. Clinicians treating infertility should advocate for couple-based therapy, and require that both partners have a thorough evaluation and an informed discussion before undergoing specific surgical therapies.