Inpatient community-based geriatric assessment reduces subsequent mortality

A randomized trial of care in a hospital medical unit especially designed to improve the functional outcomes of acutely ill older patients

BACKGROUND

Older persons who re hospitalized for acute illnesses often lose their independence and are discharged to institutions for long-term care.

METHODS

We studied 651 patients 70 years of age or older who were admitted for general medical care at a teaching hospital; these patients were randomly assigned to receive usual care or to be cared for in a special unit designed to help older persons maintain or achieve independence in self-care activities. The key elements of this program were a specially prepared environment (with, for example, uncluttered hallways, large clocks and calendars, and handrails); patient-centered care emphasizing independence, including specific protocols for prevention of disability and for rehabilitation; discharge planning with the goal of returning the patient to his or her home; and intensive review of medical care to minimize the adverse effects of procedures and medications. The main outcome we measured ws the change from admission to discharge in the number of five basic activities of daily living (bathing, getting dressed, using the toilet, moving from a bed to a chair, and eating) that the patient could perform independently.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients in each group died in the hospital. At the time of discharge, 65 (21 percent) of the 303 surviving patients in the intervention group were classified as much better in terms of their ability to perform basic activities of daily living, 39 (13 percent) as better, 151 (50 percent) as unchanged, 22 (7 percent) as worse, and 26 (9 percent) as much worse. In the usual care group, 40 (13 percent) of the 300 surviving patients were classified as much better, 33 (11 percent) as better, 163 (54 percent) as unchanged, 39 (13 percent) as worse, and 25 (8 percent) as much worse (P = 0.009). The difference between the groups remained significant (P = 0.04) in a multivariable model in which we controlled for potentially confounding base-line characteristics of the patients. Lengths of stay and hospital charges were similar in the two groups. Fewer patients assigned to the intervention group were discharged to long-term care institutions (43 patients [14 percent], as compared with 67 patients [22 percent] in the usual-care group; P = 0.01). Among the 493 patients discharged to private homes, similar proportions (about 10 percent) in the two groups were admitted to long-term care institutions during the three months after discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

Specific changes in the provision of acute hospital care can improve the ability of a heterogeneous group of acutely ill older patients to perform basic activities of daily living at the time of discharge from the hospital and can reduce the frequency of discharge to institutions for long-term care.

A geriatric assessment and intervention team for hospital inpatients awaiting transfer to a geriatric unit: a randomized trial

The objective of this study, designed as a randomized controlled trial, was to decrease the length-of-stay (LOS) of hospitalized patients on a waiting list for admission to an inpatient geriatric assessment unit (GAU), and to optimize use of the GAU and other hospital services. The participants included 108 elderly, functionally impaired inpatients referred for geriatric consultation, and appropriate for GAU admission, stratified into high and low ADL functioning groups. They were admitted to a 354-bed acute hospital, with a 31-bed long-stay ward and a 15-bed GAU; a 25-30 day delay occurred between screening and admission of inpatients to the GAU. Experimental subjects (N = 25) received the consultative services of a geriatric assessment and intervention team (GAIT) immediately after being qualified for GAU admission, in place of waiting for GAU services. Controls (N = 52) received usual hospital care until admitted to the GAU. While high-function patients randomized to the GAIT had significantly shorter hospital LOS than comparable controls (41.4 vs 56.5 days; p = 0.03), LOS reduction was even greater in the low-function stratum (44.5 vs 74.5 days; p = 0.001). Further, significantly more GAIT than control patients were discharged home (28% vs 11%; p = 0.044). A trend toward reduced mortality in the GAIT group was non-significant. We conclude that for Canadian hospitals in which extensive stays of frail elderly patients, "bed blockage", and thus access to unit-based geriatric services are common problems, the GAIT can efficiently decrease hospital LOS, increase home placement, and may improve outcomes.

Geriatric home assessment after hospital discharge

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the feasibility of an intervention involving post-discharge geriatric home assessment and follow-up and to describe the spectrum of significant clinical problems identified during the home assessment.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study nested within a randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Inpatient service of a large academic medical center in Southern California.

PATIENTS

There were 152 adults aged 65 or greater who had one or more specific risk factors for functional decline or increased mortality, who were awaiting discharge from the hospital, and who were assigned to the intervention arm of a randomized controlled trial of post-discharge comprehensive geriatric home assessment.

MAIN RESULTS

During the home assessment, the gerontologic nurse practitioner (GNP) identified new or worsening problems in 150 patients (99%); 61 problems (eg, serum sodium 125 mg/dL; severe orthostatic hypotension) were considered by a reviewing physician to require urgent medical attention. Older age, non-white race, and new incontinence were associated independently with a greater number of findings (P < 0.05). Based on the findings, an interdisciplinary team made an average of 3.4 recommendations per patient; only two of 111 requests for written approval of recommendations were rejected.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-discharge visitation by a GNP to patients at high risk is capable of detecting a high yield of important and potentially reversible clinical problems. This multidisciplinary approach is acceptable to physicians. Research is needed to identify additional links between short hospital stays, impairment or instability at discharge, and adverse outcomes.

Rationale and design of a multi-center randomized trial of comprehensive geriatric assessment consultation for hospitalized patients in an HMO

OBJECTIVE

To describe the evaluation of an interdisciplinary comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) consultation program for targeted hospitalized patients.

DESIGN

Multi-center randomized clinical trial (RCT) at four hospitals where patients were randomly assigned to CGA consultation or usual care by the attending physician, and a non-equivalent control group (NCG) at two hospitals.

SETTING

Six hospitals in a multi-specialty group practice model health maintenance organization (HMO).

PARTICIPANTS

3593 patients age 65 years or older meeting at least one of 13 inclusionary criteria at admission.

INTERVENTION

Screening by hospital staff and standardized CGA consultation conducted by a nurse practitioner, social worker, and geriatrician at the four RCT hospitals.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Functional and health status, mortality, rehospitalization, and cost-effectiveness of the CGA program at 1 year post-randomization; validation of targeting (inclusionary) criteria that identify subgroups of patients deriving benefit from CGA; and physician contamination (learning from CGA and changing treatment provided to control patients).

CONCLUSIONS

A number of methodological issues need to be considered when conducting effectiveness trials of CGA. The concurrent design of a multi-center RCT, coupled with the NCG to determine physician contamination, is an innovative approach intended to determine more precisely the cost-effectiveness of CGA for frail hospitalized elderly persons. The large and heterogeneous patient population and the broad array of inclusionary criteria will permit the evaluation of the benefit of CGA for subgroups. All these features are intended to enhance the generalizability of study results.

A controlled trial of outpatient geriatric evaluation and management

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of targeted outpatient geriatric evaluation and management (GEM).

DESIGN

Controlled clinical trial. Elderly persons were identified as being at high risk for hospital admission on the basis of their responses to a short, mailed, self-administered questionnaire. The high-risk elders who chose to participate in the GEM program were compared to those who continued to receive usual care.

SETTING

Outpatient GEM clinic at an urban university hospital.

SUBJECTS

Elderly Medicaid recipients whose probability of repeated hospital admission (Pra) within 4 years was calculated as 40% or greater (Pra > or = 0.40).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mortality, use of institutional services, satisfaction.

RESULTS

Of the 1210 persons who were sent questionnaires, 624 responded (response rate = 51.6%), of whom 154 (24.7%) were deemed to be a high risk for hospitalization. Of these, 43 received GEM (experimental subjects); 111 received usual care (controls). At baseline, the experimental and control groups' demographic and health-related characteristics did not differ significantly. The average experimental subject was 76.5 years old, had 9.6 significant medical problems, and took 6.7 significant long-term prescription medications. During the program's first 17 months of follow-up, the experimental subjects had lower annual rates of mortality (2.9% vs 19.2%, P = 0.03) and emergency room use (0.6 vs 1.0 visits, P = 0.01) than did the controls. The experimental subjects also tended to use nursing homes, but not hospitals, at a lower rate than the controls. All of the experimental subjects rated the program as either excellent (81.0%) or good (19.0%); 100% said they would recommend it to others. Their established primary physicians rated the GEM services as appropriate and helpful.

CONCLUSION

Targeted outpatient GEM was associated with reduced mortality, reduced use of emergency rooms, and a trend toward reduced use of nursing homes.

Comprehensive geriatric assessment: a meta-analysis of controlled trials

There is disagreement on the usefulness of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) due to conflicting results from individual trials. We did a meta-analysis on 28 controlled trials comprising 4959 subjects allocated to one of five CGA types and 4912 controls. Published data were supplemented with reanalysed data provided by the original investigators. We calculated combined odds ratios of important outcomes by pooling data from individual trials with multivariate logistic regression. Combined odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of living at home at follow-up was 1.68 (1.17-2.41) for geriatric evaluation and management units, 1.49 (1.12-1.98) for hospital-home assessment services, and 1.20 (1.05-1.37) for home assessment services. Covariate analysis showed that programmes with control over medical recommendations and extended ambulatory follow-up were more likely to be effective. Our analysis suggests that CGA programmes linking geriatric evaluation with strong long-term management are effective for improving survival and function in older persons.