A Population-Based Study of Cholinesterase Inhibitor Use for Dementia

The relationship between variations in antipsychotic prescribing across nursing homes and short-term mortality: quality of care implications

BACKGROUND

High rates of antipsychotic drug prescribing in nursing homes can signal poor quality processes, but also raise concerns about drug safety due to the mortality risk of this therapy. Determining the extent to which variations in antipsychotic use are a symptom of facility-level quality problems as compared with a drug safety issue is important for selecting the correct interventions to effect change.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether nursing homes with higher rates of antipsychotic dispensing had higher rates of short-term mortality among their residents.

METHODS

This population-based study examined 60,105 older adults newly admitted to nursing homes in Ontario between April 1, 2000 and March 31, 2004. Using adjusted Cox proportional hazard models, we explored the relationship between facility-level dispensing rates and mortality, controlling for resident characteristics. Facilities were grouped into quintiles according to mean antipsychotic rate. All-cause mortality at 30 and 120 days after admission was stratified by recent hospital discharge and analyzed by quintile.

RESULTS

Average antipsychotic dispensing ranged from 11.6% in the lowest quintile to 30.0% in the highest. Among residents with no recent hospitalization, all-cause mortality at 30 days was 2.5% in the lowest compared with 3.3% in the highest quintile (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.28, confidence interval: 1.06-1.56) and at 120 days was 9.3% compared with 11.7% (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.25, confidence interval: 1.13-1.39).

CONCLUSION

Residents were at increased risk of death simply by being admitted to a facility with a higher intensity of antipsychotic drug use, despite similar clinical characteristics at admission.

Persistence with cholinesterase inhibitor therapy for dementia: an observational administrative health database study

OBJECTIVE

To determine if choice of drug and ease of administration affect persistence of therapy with cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) for treatment of dementia.

METHODS

An observational administrative health database study was conducted in 5622 patients aged >or=65 years who received a new prescription for donepezil (DON), rivastigmine (RIV) or galantamine (GAL) from February to May 2006. Patients were followed for 1 year from initiation of therapy to determine percentage persistence and days of therapy. Once-daily galantamine extended release (GAL-ER) was compared with twice-daily galantamine immediate release (GAL-IR) to determine if ease of administration affected persistence. Previous treatment with ChEIs was also documented.

RESULTS

One-year persistence rates were significantly different among the ChEIs: GAL-ER 54% (95% CI 51, 57), DON 46% (95% CI 43, 49) and RIV 40% (95% CI 37, 43). Average days of therapy were greater for GAL-ER (293) than for RIV (272), but there were no differences between DON (287) and GAL-ER or DON and RIV. One-year persistence was significantly greater for GAL-ER 54% (95% CI 48, 59) than for GAL-IR 44% (95% CI 39, 50), although there was no significant difference in days of therapy (293 vs 286, respectively). More patients currently treated with RIV (40.5%) or GAL-ER (32.3%) had received previous treatment with a different ChEI than with DON (21.9%).

CONCLUSION

Among possible factors affecting persistence of ChEI therapy for dementia, choice of drug, ease of administration and previous treatment appear to be important.

Therapy for Alzheimer's Disease: How Effective are Current Treatments?

Available symptomatic therapies for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD) have been based on known neurotransmitter dysfunctions associated with the illness. The second-generation cholinesterase inhibitors and the N-methyl D-aspartate receptor antagonist memantine have been widely prescribed and studied. Meta-analyses of these therapies were reviewed, focusing on effectiveness and tolerability. Although many of the meta-analyses demonstrate statistically significant improvements, some question if these benefits are sufficient to justify their current widespread and protracted use. This has spurred the development of new disease-modifying therapies that aim to have a greater impact on this debilitating illness.

Diagnosis and treatment of dementia: 5. Nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapy for mild to moderate dementia

BACKGROUND

Practising physicians frequently seek advice on the most effective interventions for dementia. In this article, we provide practical guidance on nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic interventions for the management of mild to moderate dementia based on recommendations from the Third Canadian Consensus Conference on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Dementia.

METHODS

We developed evidence-based guidelines using systematic literature searches, with specific criteria for the selection and quality assessment of articles, and a clear and transparent decision-making process. We selected articles published from January 1996 to December 2005 that dealt with the management of mild to moderate stages of Alzheimer disease and other forms of dementia. Recommendations based on the literature review were drafted and voted on. Consensus required 80% or more agreement by participants. Subsequent to the conference, we searched for additional articles published from January 2006 to April 2008 using the same major keywords and secondary search terms. We graded the strength of the evidence using the criteria of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.

RESULTS

We identified 1615 articles, of which 954 were selected for further study. From a synthesis of the evidence in these studies, we made 48 recommendations for the management of mild to moderate dementia (28) and dementia with a cerebrovascular component (8) as well as recommendations for addressing ethical issues (e.g., disclosure of the diagnosis) (12). The updated literature review did not change these recommendations. An exercise program is recommended for patients with mild to moderate dementia. Physicians should decide whether to prescribe a cholinesterase inhibitor on an individual basis, balancing anticipated benefits with the potential for harm. For mild mood and behavioural concerns, nonpharmacologic approaches should be considered first.

INTERPRETATION

Although the available therapies for dementia can help with the management of symptoms, there is a need to develop more effective interventions.