The implantable neurocybernetic prosthesis system

Vagus nerve stimulation for treatment of partial seizures: 1. A controlled study of effect on seizures. First International Vagus Nerve Stimulation Study Group

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) was shown to reduce seizure frequency in refractory epilepsy patients in two pilot studies. Based on these results, a multicenter, prospectively randomized, parallel, double-blind study of patients with refractory partial seizures was initiated. After a 12-week baseline period, identical vagus nerve stimulators were implanted and patients randomized to either a high or low 14-week VNS treatment paradigm. The primary objective was to demonstrate that high VNS (therapeutic parameters) was more effective in reducing partial seizure frequency than was low VNS (less or noneffective parameters). Patients continued receiving antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) with plasma concentrations held constant throughout the study. We report results of the first 67 patients to exit the 14-week acute phase. After 14 weeks of VNS, 31 patients receiving high VNS experienced a mean seizure frequency percentage reduction of 30.9%, which was statistically significant as compared with the mean seizure frequency percentage reduction of 11.3% in 36 patients receiving low VNS (p = 0.029, t test; p = 0.036, Wilcoxon rank-sum test). In addition to the significant intragroup p-values, mean seizure frequency percentage change reached statistical significance for high VNS (p < 0.001) but not low VNS (p = 0.072) as compared with baseline. Twelve of 31 (38.7%) patients receiving high VNS achieved at least 50% reduction in seizure frequency whereas 7 of 36 (19.4%) patients receiving low VNS experienced at least 50% reduction after 14 weeks. The implant procedure and VNS therapy were well tolerated. Our study confirmed the effectiveness of VNS as treatment for epilepsy patients with refractory partial seizures.

Vagus nerve stimulation for treatment of partial seizures: 2. Safety, side effects, and tolerability. First International Vagus Nerve Stimulation Study Group

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) significantly reduces the frequency of partial seizures in refractory epilepsy patients. We examined the serious adverse events, side effects, and tolerability as they relate to the surgical implant procedure and the stimulating device. We also reviewed potential drug interactions, device output complications, and impact of the therapy on overall health status. We analyzed the first 67 patients to exist the acute phase of the EO3 VNS trial comparing high (therapeutic) VNS to low (less or noneffective) VNS. Data were collected from case report forms used at each of the four visits during the 12-week baseline and at each of the four visits during the 14-week randomized phase of the trial. No significant complications were reported as a result of the implant procedure. Serious adverse events included 1 patient who experienced direct current to the vagus nerve owing to generator malfunction resulting in left vocal cord paralysis and withdrawal of the patient from the study. No clinically significant effects on vital signs, cardiac function, or gastric function were detected. Side effects associated with VNS in the high group were hoarseness (35.5%), coughing (13.9%), and throat pain (12.9%). In the low group, only hoarseness (13.9%) and throat pain (13.9%) were associated with VNS. These effects generally wrre not considered clinically significant and occurred primarily during the stimulation pulses. No patients discontinued VNS therapy during the acute phase because of side effects associated with normal stimulation. Except for the one instance of a short circuit in the system resulting in a direct current, stimulating system complications were minor, limited to programming, unscheduled stimulation, and high lead impedance. Patients, investigators, and patient companions rated patients receiving high stimulation as more "improved" than those receiving low stimulation in regards to overall health status. Antiepileptic drug (AED) plasma concentrations were not affected by VNS. The implant procedure, stimulating system, and therapy proved safe and tolerable during the study. The high percentage (67 of 68) of patients completing the study reflects patient acceptance and tolerability of this mode of therapy.

Vagus nerve stimulation for complex partial seizures: surgical technique, safety, and efficacy

Electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve has shown efficacy in controlling seizures in experimental models, and early clinical trials have suggested possible benefit in humans. Eleven patients with complex partial seizures were subjected to implantation of vagus nerve stimulators. Electrode contacts embedded in silicone rubber spirals were placed on the left vagus nerve in the low cervical area. A transcutaneously programmable stimulator module was placed in an infraclavicular subcutaneous pocket and connected to the electrode. One patient required replacement of the system due to electrode fracture. Another patient developed delayed ipsilateral vocal-cord paralysis; the technique was then modified to allow more tolerance for postoperative nerve edema. A third patient showed asymptomatic vocal-cord paresis on immediate postoperative laryngoscopy. Vagus nerve stimulation produces transient vocal-cord dysfunction while the current is on. Nine patients were randomly assigned to receive either high- or low-current stimulation, and seizure frequency was recorded. The high-current stimulation group showed a median reduction in seizure frequency of 27.7% compared to the preimplantation baseline, while the low-current stimulation group showed a median increase of 6.3%. This difference approached statistical significance. The entire population then received maximally tolerable stimulation. The high-current stimulation group showed a further 14.3% reduction, while the low-current stimulation group showed a 25.4% reduction compared to the blinded period. The efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation seemed to depend on stimulus parameters, and a cumulative effect was evident. These results are encouraging, and further study of this modality as an adjunct treatment for epilepsy is warranted.

Electrostimulation effects of the vagus nerve on balance in epilepsy

Preliminary results of selected postural measures in quiet standing indicate that stimulation of the vagus nerve appears not to be producing adverse effects. With this specific sample size, more testing is needed to determine long-term effects and future data analyses will examine correlations between electroencephalogram results, drug levels, and seizure frequency. In the present study three subjects have had old injuries to hips and ankles. Two subjects had normal values for postural control prior to stimulation, while other subjects were severely abnormal. In future, studies should include larger homogeneous sample sizes, as the current subjects show marked variability in age and premorbid health backgrounds. Future work should also control more vigorously for variables such as visual input (i.e., blindfolding subjects instead of simply closing the eyes). Evaluation of postural control mechanisms will be continued to assess stability changes in these patients as seizure frequency continues to subside.

Neurocardiac responses to vagoafferent electrostimulation in humans

To determine if cardiac vagal tone is enhanced by vagal electrostimulation (VES), we examined the heart rate autospectrum (HRA) in eight patients with implanted stimulators for complex partial seizures. In four patients the VES was activated at 30 Hz and 500-msec pulse (HiStim group) compared to 2 Hz and 130-msec pulse for the LoStim group (n = 4). Continuous ECG and respiratory waveforms were recorded for 45 minutes every 8 hours (7-8 AM; 3-4 PM 11-12 PM) during resting supine wakeful epochs both before and 15 days after surgical implantation. From the HRA cardiac sympathovagal balance was expressed as the ratio of the low frequency (LF) power to the high frequency (HF) power.

RESULTS

There were no presurgical differences between the groups in heart rate, its variance, or the energies contained in any autospectral band. The LoStim group showed no significant change in heart rate (HR), HF peak power, or LF:HF ratios during 2 weeks of VES. Conversely, in the HiStim group, the LF:HF peak power ratio (an expression of sympathetic dominance) decreased from 2.5 +/- 1.5 preimplant to 1.5 +/- 0.49 (P < 0.02) with VES. During VES there was a significantly higher HF power in the HiStim compared to LoStim group. No diurnal variations in HRA values were seen for either group.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) A relationship exists between selective vagal nerve electrostimulation and the HRA; and (2) high stimulation frequency of the vagus nerve in man is associated with sustained augmentation of cardiac vagal tone throughout a 24-hour cycle.

Clinical experience with a helical bipolar stimulating lead

Over 100 patients have been treated for partial epilepsy using a NeuroCybernetic Prosthesis System (NCP). The NCP System is comprised of an implantable pulse generator, an implantable bipolar stimulating lead, and an external communication system. The lead delivers electrical impulses from the NCP Generator to the vagus nerve, and includes a connector end that plugs into the generator, a silicone insulated lead body, and the helical electrode array that attaches to the nerve. The surgical implantation technique has a significant impact on lead reliability and performance. The lead electrode has performed well to date. Modifications to further improve reliability have been implemented. Clinical experience, case history examples, and voltage measurements are examined. The lead electrode is an important component of the overall system and plays a significant part in the success of vagus nerve stimulation therapy.

Treatment of refractory partial seizures: preliminary results of a controlled study

Vagus nerve stimulation for the treatment of epilepsy has been studied in medically refractory patients with partial seizures in a randomized, blinded, parallel study. After a 3-month baseline period, the patients were implanted with the Neurocybernetic Prosthesis (NCP) system consisting of the NCP Generator and the Bipolar Vagal Stimulation Lead. Two stimulation paradigms were used, HIGH, which delivers what is considered to be optimal stimulation parameters and LOW, which is considered to be less or noneffective. The system and vagus nerve stimulation were well tolerated and few adverse events have been attributed to either. One patient experienced a period of direct current to the nerve due to a generator malfunction. This results in paralysis of the left vocal cord. Efficacy analysis on the first 37 patients to complete the controlled portion of the study has shown that the patients in the HIGH group experienced a mean reduction in seizure frequency of 33.3% and patients in the LOW group experienced a mean reduction in seizure frequency of 8.4%. The difference between the groups is statistically significant with a P value of 0.025. Analysis of seizure duration and intensity does not show any significant change. Ratings of the patient's overall condition by the patient, investigator, and companion as a measurement of "quality of life" also show improvement in the HIGH group. The results of this interim study demonstrate that vagus nerve stimulation is a safe and effective method of treating partial epileptic seizures.

Effects of chronic left vagal stimulation on visceral vagal function in man

We examined the effects of chronic left vagal electrostimulation on afferent and efferent gastrointestinal vagal function in eight patients. Afferent function was assessed using cortical evoked responses to electrical stimulation of the esophagus and to direct vagal stimulation using the implanted left vagal electrode. Efferent gastrointestinal vagal function was measured by examining the basal, maximal, and sham fed stimulated gastric acid output prior to and with chronic left vagal electrostimulation. Esophageal electrostimulation produced a cortical evoked response consisting of three negative and three positive peaks within 400 msec after stimulation. Prior to vagal electrostimulation the mean conduction velocity of the afferent signal was measured at 8.72 +/- 3.39 m/sec, compatible with A-delta fibers involvement. Basal, maximal, and sham fed acid output were 1.11, 21.87, and 9.37 mmol/hour, respectively. The evoked response to esophageal electrical stimulation was not changed with chronic left vagal electrostimulation. Direct vagal stimulation also produced evoked potentials that were comparable to those obtained with esophageal stimulation. The mean conduction velocity was 6.26 +/- 2.72 m/sec (NS) so that there was no evidence of loss of myelinated fibers with chronic stimulation. No differences were detected in basal (1.29 mmol/h), maximal (21.64 mmol/h), or sham fed stimulated (8.03 mmol/h) acid output, showing that vagal electrostimulation has no effect on either total or vagally mediated acid output, an efferent vagal function. In conclusion, chronic left vagal electrostimulation has no significant adverse effect on gastrointestinal vagal function.

Effect of Vagal Nerve Electrostimulation on the Power Spectrum of Heart Rate Variability in Man

The power spectrum of heart rate variability contains low frequency (LF = 0.08-0.12 Hz) and high frequency (HF = 0.18-0.30 Hz) components said to represent neurocardiac rhythms. To verify whether such a relationship exists we report a unique study where the heart rate autospectrum was determined in a 28-year-old epileptic male patient with an implanted vagal electrical stimulator. The stimulator was activated at 20 Hz, 300 microseconds pulse, and 1.25 V. Continuous ECG and respiratory waveform records were obtained over 45 minutes every 8 hours (7-8 AM; 3-4 PM; 11-12 PM) with the stimulator ON, then 24 hours OFF and then 24 hours ON again. The overall LF:HF peak ratio increased from 0.64 to 1.99 (P less than 0.001) after the stimulator was turned OFF. There was a dramatic increase in the LF peak power (greater than 60%) and a corresponding decrease in the HF peak power (greater than 65%) when the stimulator was turned OFF. These values were reversed when the stimulator was turned ON again. In the early morning and late evening hours, there was a significant rightward shift in the LF peak power frequency (average 0.057 to 0.075 Hz) whenever the stimulator was ON. Otherwise, there were no significant circadian variations in any of the autospectral components. The results demonstrate an unequivocal relationship between selective vagal nerve electrostimulation and alterations in the heart rate autospectrum.

A review of the functional electrical stimulation equipment market

The market for functional electrical stimulation (FES) equipment for use in rehabilitation is growing as increasingly sophisticated products enter the market each year. Factors that impact the availability of FES equipment include technological limitations, government regulation, reimbursement status, and clinician training. New products have become available in the last decade with many innovative applications available under investigational status. The current availability of FES equipment for selected applications such as therapeutic muscle stimulation, cardiovascular exercise, restoration of function in the lower and upper extremities, respiratory assist, restoration of bladder function, electroejaculation, and scoliosis correction is reviewed. A review of FES equipment for nonneuromuscular applications such as control of epilepsy, cochlear implants, electrotactile stimulation, and systems to enhance wound healing and bone growth is also included. Key manufacturers are identified.