Which reconstructive procedures are effective for treating the periodontal intraosseous defect?

Periodontal tissue engineering and regeneration: current approaches and expanding opportunities

The management of periodontal tissue defects that result from periodontitis represents a medical and socioeconomic challenge. Concerted efforts have been and still are being made to accelerate and augment periodontal tissue and bone regeneration, including a range of regenerative surgical procedures, the development of a variety of grafting materials, and the use of recombinant growth factors. More recently, tissue-engineering strategies, including new cell- and/or matrix-based dimensions, are also being developed, analyzed, and employed for periodontal regenerative therapies. Tissue engineering in periodontology applies the principles of engineering and life sciences toward the development of biological techniques that can restore lost alveolar bone, periodontal ligament, and root cementum. It is based on an understanding of the role of periodontal formation and aims to grow new functional tissues rather than to build new replacements of periodontium. Although tissue engineering has merged to create more opportunities for predictable and optimal periodontal tissue regeneration, the technique and design for preclinical and clinical studies remain in their early stages. To date, the reconstruction of small- to moderate-sized periodontal bone defects using engineered cell-scaffold constructs is technically feasible, and some of the currently developed concepts may represent alternatives for certain ideal clinical scenarios. However, the predictable reconstruction of the normal structure and functionality of a tooth-supporting apparatus remains challenging. This review summarizes current regenerative procedures for periodontal healing and regeneration and explores their progress and difficulties in clinical practice, with particular emphasis placed upon current challenges and future possibilities associated with tissue-engineering strategies in periodontal regenerative medicine.

Regeneration of periodontal tissue: bone replacement grafts

Bone replacement grafts are widely used to promote bone formation and periodontal regeneration. Conventional surgical approaches, such as open flap debridement, provide critical access to evaluate and detoxify root surfaces as well as establish improved periodontal form and architecture; however, these surgical techniques offer only limited potential in restoring or reconstituting component periodontal tissues. A wide range of bone grafting materials, including bone grafts and bone graft substitutes, have been applied and evaluated clinically, including autografts, allografts, xenografts, and alloplasts (synthetic/semisynthetic materials). This review provides an overview of the biologic function and clinical application of bone replacement grafts for periodontal regeneration. Emphasis is placed on the clinical and biologic goals of periodontal regeneration as well as evidence-based treatment outcomes.

The effect of enamel matrix derivative (Emdogain) on bone formation: a systematic review

This systematic review focused on the question, if and to what extent enamel matrix derivative (Emdogain) [EMD]) promotes the regeneration of bone. The influence of combinations with other biomaterials was additionally evaluated. Twenty histomorphometric studies were included in this systematic review. Main results of the reviewed articles were (i) guide tissue regeneration (GTR) of infrabony defects seems to result in a higher degree of bone regeneration compared to treatment with EMD; (ii) combined therapy (GTR + EMD) of infrabony defects might not lead to better results than GTR therapy alone; (iii) there seems to be no additional benefit of combined therapy (GTR + EMD) in furcation defects over GTR therapy alone; (iv) EMD seems to lead to more bone regeneration of infrabony defects compared to open flap debridement; (v) however, EMD application might result in more bone formation when applied in supporting defects compared to nonsupporting defects; and (vi) EMD does not seem to promote external jaw/parietal bone formation in the titanium capsule model. The results of one study that suggest that EMD increases the initial growth of trabecular bone around endosseous implants by new bone induction need to be confirmed by additional research.

Localized delivery of growth factors for periodontal tissue regeneration: role, strategies, and perspectives

Difficulties associated with achieving predictable periodontal regeneration, means that novel techniques need to be developed in order to regenerate the extensive soft and hard tissue destruction that results from periodontitis. Localized delivery of growth factors to the periodontium is an emerging and versatile therapeutic approach, with the potential to become a powerful tool in future regenerative periodontal therapy. Optimized delivery regimes and well-defined release kinetics appear to be logical prerequisites for safe and efficacious clinical application of growth factors and to avoid unwanted side effects and toxicity. While adequate concentrations of growth factor(s) need to be appropriately localized, delivery vehicles are also expected to possess properties such as protein protection, precision in controlled release, biocompatibility and biodegradability, self-regulated therapeutic activity, potential for multiple delivery, and good cell/tissue penetration. Here, current knowledge, recent advances, and future possibilities of growth factor delivery strategies are outlined for periodontal regeneration. First, the role of those growth factors that have been implicated in the periodontal healing/regeneration process, general requirements for their delivery, and the different material types available are described. A detailed discussion follows of current strategies for the selection of devices for localized growth factor delivery, with particular emphasis placed upon their advantages and disadvantages and future prospects for ongoing studies in reconstructing the tooth supporting apparatus.

Effect of Autogenous Cortical Bone Particulate in Conjunction With Enamel Matrix Derivative in the Treatment of Periodontal Intraosseous Defects

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to assess the additional clinical benefit of autogenous cortical bone particulate (ACBP) when added to enamel matrix derivative (EMD), compared to EMD alone, in the treatment of deep periodontal intraosseous defects.

METHODS

A total of 28 intraosseous lesions in 27 patients with advanced periodontitis were included in this controlled clinical trial and randomly assigned to the EMD group (14 defects) or to the EMD + ACBP group (14 defects). Immediately before surgery (baseline) and after 6 and 12 months, probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), and gingival recession (REC) were recorded. Radiographic depth of the defect (DEPTH) was also measured at baseline and 12 months post-surgery.

RESULTS

At 6 and 12 months, PD and CAL significantly improved from baseline in both groups (P <0.000). No significant differences in terms of CAL gain and PD reduction were detected between groups. However, defect distribution according to CAL gain was significantly different between groups (P <0.05). DEPTH significantly decreased from baseline to 12 months in both groups (P <0.000); between-group differences were not significant. At 12 months, a significantly greater REC increase in the EMD group (1.1 +/- 0.7 mm) compared to the EMD + ACBP group (0.3 +/- 0.8 mm) was observed (P <0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Both EMD and EMD + ACBP treatments led to a significant improvement in clinical and radiographic parameters at follow-up with respect to presurgery condition. The combined approach resulted in reduced post-surgery recession and increased proportion of defects with substantial CAL gain (> or = 6 mm).

Autogenous bone graft in conjunction with enamel matrix derivative in the treatment of deep periodontal intra-osseous defects: a report of 13 consecutively treated patients

AIM

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effectiveness of a regenerative procedure based on supra-crestal soft tissue preservation in association with combined autogenous bone (AB) graft/enamel matrix derivative (EMD) application in the treatment of deep periodontal intra-osseous defects.

METHODS

Thirteen consecutively treated patients, seven females and six males, aged 30-65 years, three smokers, were included. A total of 15 deep, one- to two-wall intra-osseous defects were selected. Immediately before surgery and 6 months after surgery, pocket probing depth (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL), and gingival recession (REC) were recorded.

RESULTS

PPD amounted to 9.4+/-1.8 mm before surgery, and decreased to 4.7+/-1.2 mm post-surgery (p<0.0000). CAL varied from 10.5+/-2.0 mm pre-surgery to 6.2+/-1.7 mm post-surgery (p<0.0000), with CAL gain averaging 4.3+/-1.4 mm. Fourteen (93.3%) defects presented CAL gain >/=3 mm. REC change was 0.4+/-0.7 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from the present study indicated that a regenerative procedure based on supra-crestal soft tissue preservation and combined AB/EMD treatment leads to a clinically and statistically significant improvement of soft tissue conditions of deep periodontal intra-osseous defects.