51
|
Caiano LM, Riva N, Carrier M, Gatt A, Ageno W. Treatment of portal vein thrombosis: an updated narrative review. Minerva Med 2021; 112:713-725. [PMID: 33832217 DOI: 10.23736/s0026-4806.21.07526-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is the most frequent among the splanchnic vein thrombosis, accounting for 90% of cases. More than half of PVT are provoked by liver cirrhosis, solid cancer or myeloproliferative neoplasms. The remaining cases are non-malignant non-cirrhotic PVT and include either unprovoked events or thrombosis secondary to other less common risk factors (e.g. abdominal surgery, intrabdominal inflammations/infections, or hormonal stimuli). Anticoagulant therapy in patients with acute symptomatic PVT should be started early after diagnosis, if no active bleeding, to obtain greater vessel recanalization and reduce the occurrence of portal-hypertension related complications. Gastroesophageal varices do not represent a contraindication to anticoagulant treatment, as long as adequate measures have been undertaken for the prophylaxis of gastroesophageal bleeding. Different treatment options (unfractionated or low molecular weight heparin, vitamin K antagonists and direct oral anticoagulants [DOACs]) can be considered. In this narrative review we will discuss the treatment of PVT in the three most common scenarios (cirrhosis-associated, cancer-associated and non-malignant non-cirrhotic PVT). We will also discuss the role of the DOACs and summarise recent guidelines on this topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucia M Caiano
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.,Department of Medicine, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Nicoletta Riva
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, Msida, Malta -
| | - Marc Carrier
- Department of Medicine, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Alex Gatt
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, Msida, Malta
| | - Walter Ageno
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Valeriani E, Di Nisio M, Riva N, Caiano LM, Porreca E, Bang SM, Beyer-Westendorf J, Sartori MT, Barillari G, Santoro R, Kamphuisen PW, Alatri A, Malato A, Vidili G, Oh D, Schulman S, Ageno W. Clinical history of cancer-associated splanchnic vein thrombosis. J Thromb Haemost 2021; 19:983-991. [PMID: 33306241 DOI: 10.1111/jth.15214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2020] [Revised: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer represents a risk factor for splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) and usual site venous thromboembolism (VTE). OBJECTIVES To compare characteristics and outcomes of patients with cancer-associated SVT and usual site VTE. PATIENTS/METHODS Patients with solid cancer and SVT were enrolled in an international, prospective registry between May 2008 and January 2012. The comparison cohort included (1:1 ratio) patients with solid cancer and usual site VTE treated at two thrombosis centers who had a minimum of 12 months follow-up at December 2019 or experienced one of the outcomes within 12 months follow-up. Recurrent VTE, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality were evaluated at 12-month follow-up. RESULTS A total of 264 patients (132 in each cohort) were enrolled. Patients with SVT were less likely to have metastatic disease (36.1% vs 72.5%) or receive cancer therapy at thrombosis diagnosis (29.6% vs 64.9%). The most frequent cancer types were hepatobiliary and pancreatic in the SVT cohort and gastrointestinal in the usual site VTE cohort. Fewer patients with SVT received anticoagulation (68.9% vs 99.2%), and treatment duration was shorter (6.0 vs 11.0 months). The cumulative incidence of major bleeding (2.3% vs 4.7%) was nonsignificantly lower in the SVT cohort, whereas recurrent thrombosis (4.7% vs 5.5%) and all-cause mortality (41.7% vs 39.4%) were comparable between the two cohorts. CONCLUSIONS The risk of recurrent thrombosis and bleeding appears to be similar in cancer patients with SVT and cancer patients with usual site VTE, despite some differences in baseline characteristics and anticoagulant treatment. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuele Valeriani
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences "G. d'Annunzio" University, Chieti, Italy
- Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Medicine, Campus-Bio Medico University, Rome, Italy
| | - Marcello Di Nisio
- Department of Medicine and Ageing Sciences, University G. D'Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Riva
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, Msida, Malta
| | - Lucia Maria Caiano
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Ettore Porreca
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences "G. d'Annunzio" University, Chieti, Italy
| | - Soo-Mee Bang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jan Beyer-Westendorf
- Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Giovanni Barillari
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ospedale S. Maria della Misericordia, Udine, Italy
| | - Rita Santoro
- Haemophilia Center, Azienda Ospedaliera Pugliese- Ciaccio, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Pieter W Kamphuisen
- Department of Vascular Medicine, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Adriano Alatri
- Hemostasis and Thrombosis Center, A.O. Istituti Ospitalieri di Cremona, Cremona, Italy
| | - Alessandra Malato
- Department of Hematology, Policlinico Universitario di Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Gianpaolo Vidili
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University Hospital of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Doyeun Oh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pochon CHA University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sam Schulman
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University and the Thrombosis and Atherosclerosis Research Institute, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Walter Ageno
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Treatment of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: The dark side of the moon. Cancer Treat Rev 2021; 96:102190. [PMID: 33812338 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2021] [Revised: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication in patients with cancer. The risk of emergent VTE is four- to seven-fold higher in cancer patients compared to non-cancer patients. Although the therapeutic armamentarium for cancer-associated VTE has been recently implemented, anticoagulant treatment remains challenging because of the increased risk of recurrent VTE and bleeding. Several international societies and expert panels released clinical practice guidelines on VTE treatment which are mostly focused on the general cancer population. Nevertheless, recommendations for the management of VTE in patients with peculiar clinical presentations are inconsistent and remain elusive due to the lack of pertinent evidence. The challenging clinical scenarios include, among others, patients with thrombocytopenia, renal impairment, gastrointestinal cancer, primary or metastatic brain cancer, distal thrombosis of the lower extremities, catheter-related VTE, splanchnic thrombosis, incidental VTE, extreme body weight, recurrent VTE during treatment, as well as the optimal duration of anticoagulant treatment in patients with active disease who have received 3 to 6 months of anticoagulation. Herein, we present a critical overview on VTE management in these challenging clinical settings, discuss potential approaches, and include some calls to action for future clinical research.
Collapse
|
54
|
Stevens H, McFadyen J, Chan N. Advances in the Management of Acute Venous Thromboembolism and New Therapeutic Agents. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2021; 42:218-232. [PMID: 33601429 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1723953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Important advances in the understanding and management of venous thromboembolism (VTE) have enhanced our ability to diagnose, prevent, and treat VTE. In this narrative review, we discuss how recent advances in the understanding and management of VTE are changing practice, highlight ongoing unmet needs in VTE management, and outline how novel therapeutic targets with little or no influence on hemostasis may help address these unmet needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Stevens
- Atherothrombosis and Vascular Biology Program, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Australian Centre for Blood Diseases, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Clinical Haematology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - James McFadyen
- Atherothrombosis and Vascular Biology Program, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Australian Centre for Blood Diseases, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Clinical Haematology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Noel Chan
- Thrombosis and Atherosclerosis Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Anticoagulant Treatment for Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis in Liver Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Thromb Haemost 2021; 121:867-876. [PMID: 33525037 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1722192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) is a common complication in patients with liver cirrhosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anticoagulant therapy for SVT in cirrhotic patients. METHODS In this systematic review and meta-analysis, studies reporting on SVT recanalization and progression, recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), major bleeding, and overall mortality were searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrial.gov up to December 2019. Pooled proportions and risk ratios (RRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS A total of 1,475 patients were included in 26 studies (23 observational and 3 randomized controlled trials). In patients receiving anticoagulant therapy, SVT recanalization occurred in 68% (95% CI, 62-74; 571/842 patients; 22 studies), SVT progression in 6% (95% CI, 4-9; 25/748 patients; 22 studies), recurrent VTE in 10% (95% CI, 4-22; 48/399 patients; 7 studies), major bleeding in 6% (95% CI, 4-10; 58/785 patients; 18 studies), and overall mortality in 9% (95% CI, 6-14; 68/787 patients; 17 studies). Anticoagulant treatment was associated with higher SVT recanalization (RR 3.19; 95% CI, 1.42-7.17), lower thrombosis progression (RR 0.28; 95% CI, 0.15-0.52), major bleeding (RR 0.52; 95% CI, 0.28-0.97), and overall mortality (RR 0.42; 95% CI, 0.24-0.73) compared with no treatment. CONCLUSION Anticoagulant therapy seems to improve vein recanalization and to reduce SVT progression, major bleeding, and overall mortality in cirrhotic patients with SVT. The incidence of recurrent VTE during anticoagulation remains substantial.
Collapse
|
56
|
Riva N, Ageno W. Direct oral anticoagulants for unusual-site venous thromboembolism. Res Pract Thromb Haemost 2021; 5:265-277. [PMID: 33733025 PMCID: PMC7938617 DOI: 10.1002/rth2.12480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Revised: 12/08/2020] [Accepted: 12/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are currently the preferred oral anticoagulant treatment for most of the patients with deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremities and/or pulmonary embolism. DOACs have several advantages over vitamin K antagonists, such as availability of fixed dosages, fewer drug interactions, faster onset of action, shorter half-life, and lower risk of major and intracranial bleeding. Although the evidence on the use of DOACs in patients with unusual-site venous thromboembolism (VTE) is limited to a few, small randomized controlled trials, these drugs are increasingly used in clinical practice, and several observational cohort studies have been published recently. This narrative review will describe the latest evidence for the use of the DOACs in patients with thrombosis in atypical locations (splanchnic, cerebral, upper extremity, ovarian, and renal vein thrombosis) and will provide some practical advice for their use in patients with unusual-site VTE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicoletta Riva
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and SurgeryUniversity of MaltaMsidaMalta
| | - Walter Ageno
- Department of Medicine and SurgeryUniversity of InsubriaVareseItaly
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Hamulyák EN, Daams JG, Leebeek FWG, Biemond BJ, Te Boekhorst PAW, Middeldorp S, Lauw MN. A systematic review of antithrombotic treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood Adv 2021; 5:113-121. [PMID: 33570633 PMCID: PMC7805324 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2020] [Accepted: 11/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and primary myelofibrosis, have an increased risk of thrombosis. Risk of recurrent thrombosis can be reduced with antithrombotic therapy and/or cytoreduction, but the optimal long-term management in patients with MPN with a history of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is unknown, and clinical practice is heterogeneous. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials and observational studies evaluating anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet therapy, with or without cytoreduction, in MPN patients with a history of VTE. A total of 5675 unique citations were screened for eligibility. No randomized trials were identified. Ten observational studies involving 1295 patients with MPN were included in the analysis. Overall, 23% had an arterial or recurrent venous thrombotic event on follow-up. The recurrence risk was lowest for patients on oral anticoagulation plus cytoreduction (16%); 55 of 313 (18%) with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and 5 of 63 (8%) with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). In 746 analyzed patients, the risk of recurrent VTE ranged up to 33% (median 13%) and was low in 63 DOAC plus cytoreduction-treated patients (3.2%). All types of antithrombotic treatments were associated with a lower risk of recurrent VTE when combined with cytoreduction. Most studies had a high risk of bias, whereas clinical and statistical heterogeneity led to inconsistent and imprecise findings. In summary, evidence on the optimal antithrombotic treatment of VTE in patients with MPN is based on observational studies only with low certainty for all strategies. Our data suggest that a combination of anticoagulation and cytoreduction may provide the lowest recurrence risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joost G Daams
- Medical Library, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frank W G Leebeek
- Department of Hematology, Erasmus University Medical Center (Erasmus MC) Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; and
| | - Bart J Biemond
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peter A W Te Boekhorst
- Department of Hematology, Erasmus University Medical Center (Erasmus MC) Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; and
| | | | - Mandy N Lauw
- Department of Vascular Medicine and
- Department of Hematology, Erasmus University Medical Center (Erasmus MC) Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; and
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Klok FA, Barco S. Anticoagulation in splanchnic and cerebral vein thrombosis: Still groping in the dark. Res Pract Thromb Haemost 2020; 4:1080-1082. [PMID: 33134773 PMCID: PMC7590299 DOI: 10.1002/rth2.12427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2020] [Revised: 08/11/2020] [Accepted: 08/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Frederikus A. Klok
- Department of Medicine – Thrombosis and HemostasisLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
- Center for Thrombosis and HemostasisUniversity Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg UniversityMainzGermany
| | - Stefano Barco
- Center for Thrombosis and HemostasisUniversity Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg UniversityMainzGermany
- Clinic of AngiologyUniversity Hospital ZurichZurichSwitzerland
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Riva N, Carrier M, Gatt A, Ageno W. Anticoagulation in splanchnic and cerebral vein thrombosis: An international vignette-based survey. Res Pract Thromb Haemost 2020; 4:1192-1202. [PMID: 33134784 PMCID: PMC7590282 DOI: 10.1002/rth2.12424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Revised: 08/05/2020] [Accepted: 08/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anticoagulant treatment of splanchnic (SVT) and cerebral vein thrombosis (CVT) can be challenging due to the rarity of these conditions, the concomitantly high thrombotic and bleeding risks, and the available low-quality evidence. OBJECTIVES To explore the current therapeutic approaches to SVT and CVT, and the rationale behind the anticoagulant treatment choice. METHODS A cross-sectional survey was conducted (October 2018-April 2019) among members of three thrombosis and hemostasis societies. The survey consisted of four vignette cases: (i) SVT secondary to transient risk factor; (ii) cirrhotic SVT with esophageal varices; (iii) CVT secondary to transient risk factor; and (iv) unprovoked CVT with intracranial hemorrhage. RESULTS A total of 397 physicians responded to the survey. There was wide variability in anticoagulant treatment options, starting time, and duration. Vitamin K antagonists were the commonest choice across the four vignette cases (44.2%-63.0%). The direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were the second commonest choice in low-bleeding-risk scenarios (27.7% in case 1, 22.9% in case 3), while parenteral anticoagulation alone was the second commonest choice in high-bleeding-risk scenarios (39.9% in case 2, 39.8% in case 4). The most frequent reasons for selecting DOACs were oral route of administration (50.6%), lack of need for laboratory monitoring (48.1%), and favorable safety profile of these drugs (43.4%). CONCLUSIONS The results of our study showed that, despite being off-label, the DOACs were considered for the treatment of unusual-site venous thromboembolism. The wide variability among different physicians reflected the clinical difficulties and raised the need for more collaborative trials on these disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicoletta Riva
- Department of PathologyFaculty of Medicine and SurgeryUniversity of MaltaMsidaMalta
| | - Marc Carrier
- Department of MedicineOttawa Hospital Research InstituteUniversity of OttawaOttawaONCanada
| | - Alex Gatt
- Department of PathologyFaculty of Medicine and SurgeryUniversity of MaltaMsidaMalta
| | - Walter Ageno
- Department of Medicine and SurgeryUniversity of InsubriaVareseItaly
| |
Collapse
|