Human platelet lysate current standards and future developments

Evaluation of topical human platelet lysate versus topical clobetasol in management of methotrexate-induced oral ulceration in rheumatoid arthritis patients: Randomized-controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

There is no mainstay protocol for management of Methotrexate-induced oral ulcers; commonly used protocols are cessation of Methotrexate, folic acid treatment, corticosteroids or combination. A new era of oral ulcers management is represented by platelet concentrates. The current study assessed the effect of topical human platelet lysate compared to topical Clobetasol Propionate in management of methotrexate-induced oral ulceration in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

METHODS

This randomized controlled clinical trial include 30 patients in two parallel groups (intervention - human platelet lysate, control - Clobetasol Propionate), with allocation ratio 1:1. Outcome measures were pain intensity using numerical rating scale, WHO scale for oral mucositis, measuring size of the largest ulcer and total number of oral ulcers.

RESULTS

A statistically significant difference was detected between HPL and Clobetasol groups on comparing numerical rating scale, WHO mucositis scale, size and total number of oral ulcers throughout all visits. A considerable quick pain reduction and clinical improvement were noticed in HPL group compared to Clobetasol.

CONCLUSION

Human platelet lysate has superior effect when compared to one of the most potent topical corticosteroids, Clobetasol Propionate, in reducing pain and clinical signs of Methotrexate-induced oral ulcers in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Defining mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC)-derived small extracellular vesicles for therapeutic applications

Small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) from mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSCs) are transiting rapidly towards clinical applications. However, discrepancies and controversies about the biology, functions, and potency of MSC-sEVs have arisen due to several factors: the diversity of MSCs and their preparation; various methods of sEV production and separation; a lack of standardized quality assurance assays; and limited reproducibility of in vitro and in vivo functional assays. To address these issues, members of four societies (SOCRATES, ISEV, ISCT and ISBT) propose specific harmonization criteria for MSC-sEVs to facilitate data sharing and comparison, which should help to advance the field towards clinical applications. Specifically, MSC-sEVs should be defined by quantifiable metrics to identify the cellular origin of the sEVs in a preparation, presence of lipid-membrane vesicles, and the degree of physical and biochemical integrity of the vesicles. For practical purposes, new MSC-sEV preparations might also be measured against a well-characterized MSC-sEV biological reference. The ultimate goal of developing these metrics is to map aspects of MSC-sEV biology and therapeutic potency onto quantifiable features of each preparation.