Reversal of plasticity-like effects in the human motor cortex

Modulation of the disturbed motor network in dystonia by multisession suppression of premotor cortex

Daily sessions of therapeutic transcranial brain stimulation are thought to prolong or amplify the effect of a single intervention. Here we show in patients with focal hand dystonia that additional, new effects build up progressively over time, making it difficult to predict the effect of long term interventions from shorter treatment sessions. In a sham-controlled study, real or sham continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) was given once daily for five consecutive days to dorsolateral premotor cortex (PMd). Five days of real, but not sham, premotor cTBS improved intracortical inhibition in primary motor cortex (M1) to a similar extent on day 1 and day 5. However 5 days of cTBS were required to restore the abnormal PMd-M1 interactions observed on day 1. Similarly, excessive M1 plasticity seen at baseline was also significantly reduced by five days of real premotor cTBS. There was only a marginal benefit on writing. The results show that additional, new effects, at sites distant from the point of stimulation, build up progressively over time, making it difficult to predict the effect of long term interventions from shorter treatment sessions. The results indicate that it may take many days of therapeutic intervention to rebalance activity in a complex network.

Homeostatic metaplasticity of corticospinal excitatory and intracortical inhibitory neural circuits in human motor cortex

Homeostatic metaplasticity, a fundamental principle for maintaining overall synaptic weight in the physiological range in neuronal networks, was demonstrated at the cellular and systems level predominantly for excitatory synaptic neurotransmission. Although inhibitory networks are crucial for regulating excitability, it is largely unknown to what extent homeostatic metaplasticity of inhibition also exists. Here, we employed intermittent and continuous transcranial magnetic theta burst stimulation (iTBS, cTBS) of the primary motor cortex in healthy subjects for induction of long-term potentiation (LTP)-like and long-term depression (LTD)-like plasticity. We studied metaplasticity by testing the interactions of priming TBS with LTP/LTD-like plasticity induced by subsequent test TBS. Changes in excitatory neurotransmission were measured by the input-output curve of motor-evoked potentials (IO-MEP), and changes in GABA(A)ergic inhibitory neurotransmission by the IO of short-interval intracortical inhibition (IO-SICI, four conditioning stimulus intensities of 70-100% active motor threshold, interstimulus interval 2.0 ms). Non-primed iTBS increased IO-MEP, while non-primed cTBS decreased IO-MEP. Pairing of identical protocols (iTBSiTBS, cTBScTBS) resulted in suppression of the non-primed TBS effects on IO-MEP, and pairing of different protocols (cTBSiTBS, iTBScTBS) enhanced the test TBS effects on IO-MEP. While non-primed TBS did not result in significant changes of IO-SICI, iTBSiTBS resulted in IO-SICI decrease, and cTBScTBS in IO-SICI increase compared with the non-primed conditions. The changes in SICI induced by priming TBS correlated with the changes in MEP induced by subsequent test TBS. Findings demonstrate that plasticity in both excitatory and inhibitory circuits in the human motor cortex are regulated by homeostatic metaplasticity, and that priming effects on inhibition contribute to the homeostatic regulation of metaplasticity in excitatory circuits.

Plasticity-inducing TMS protocols to investigate somatosensory control of hand function

Hand function depends on sensory feedback to direct an appropriate motor response. There is clear evidence that somatosensory cortices modulate motor behaviour and physiology within primary motor cortex. However, this information is mainly from research in animals and the bridge to human hand control is needed. Emerging evidence in humans supports the notion that somatosensory cortices modulate motor behaviour, physiology and sensory perception. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) allows for the investigation of primary and higher-order somatosensory cortices and their role in control of hand movement in humans. This review provides a summary of several TMS protocols in the investigation of hand control via the somatosensory cortices. TMS plasticity inducing protocols reviewed include paired associative stimulation, repetitive TMS, theta-burst stimulation as well as other techniques that aim to modulate cortical excitability in sensorimotor cortices. Although the discussed techniques may modulate cortical excitability, careful consideration of experimental design is needed to isolate factors that may interfere with desired results of the plasticity-inducing protocol, specifically events that may lead to metaplasticity within the targeted cortex.

Contralesional hemisphere control of the proximal paretic upper limb following stroke

Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (c-tDCS) can reduce excitability of neurons in primary motor cortex (M1) and may facilitate motor recovery after stroke. However, little is known about the neurophysiological effects of tDCS on proximal upper limb function. We hypothesized that suppression of contralesional M1 (cM1) excitability would produce neurophysiological effects that depended on the severity of upper limb impairment. Twelve patients with varying upper limb impairment after subcortical stroke were assessed on clinical scales of upper limb spasticity, impairment, and function. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to determine lesion size and fractional anisotropy (FA) within the posterior limbs of the internal capsules indicative of corticospinal tract integrity. Excitability within paretic M1 biceps brachii representation was determined from motor-evoked potentials during selective isometric tasks, after cM1 sham stimulation and after c-tDCS. These neurophysiological data indicate that c-tDCS improved selective proximal upper limb control for mildly impaired patients and worsened it for moderate to severely impaired patients. The direction of the neurophysiological after effects of c-tDCS was strongly related to upper limb spasticity, impairment, function, and FA asymmetry between the posterior limbs of the internal capsules. These results indicate systematic variation of cM1 for proximal upper limb control after stroke and that suppression of cM1 excitability is not a "one size fits all" approach.

Modulation of cortical motor networks following primed θ burst transcranial magnetic stimulation

To investigate whether priming stimulation influences the responses of intracortical inhibitory and facilitatory motor circuits to a subsequent plasticity-inducing inhibitory theta burst TMS paradigm. Using standard transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) procedures, MEP amplitude, short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), and short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF) were assessed at baseline and 5, 20 and 30 min following continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS), intermittent TBS (iTBS), and iTBS-primed cTBS. SICI was assessed using paired-pulse TMS at inter-stimulus intervals (ISI) of 3 ms (SICI(3)) and the latency corresponding to the latency at which SICF was minimal in each individual. SICF was assessed at ISIs corresponding to Peak 1, Trough 1, Peak 2, and Peak 3 of each individual's SICF curve. When applied alone cTBS inhibited and iTBS facilitated MEP amplitudes. iTBS-primed cTBS resulted in greater MEP inhibition than cTBS alone. There were no changes in SICF and only marginal changes in SICI following any intervention. Synapses mediating MEP generation undergo modification following iTBS-primed cTBS, possibly through mechanisms related to metaplasticity or synaptic depotentiation. A lack of substantial changes in SICI and SICF under all experimental conditions suggests that the tested rTMS paradigms may be non-optimal for inducing robust modulation of the neural elements mediating SICI and SICF across subjects. Priming stimulation may provide an approach which facilitate neuroplastic change within the human motor cortex at least in circuits responsible for MEP generation.