A multicenter, randomized study comparing the efficacy and safety of intravenous and/or oral levofloxacin versus ceftriaxone and/or cefuroxime axetil in treatment of adults with community-acquired pneumonia

Antibiotics for community acquired pneumonia in adult outpatients

BACKGROUND

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), the sixth most common cause of death worldwide, is a common condition representing a significant disease burden for the community, particularly in the elderly. Antibiotics are helpful in treating CAP and are the standard treatment. CAP contributes significantly to antibiotic use, which is associated with the development of bacterial resistance and side-effects. Several studies have been published concerning treatment for CAP. Available data arises mainly hospitalized patients studies. This is an update of our 2004 Cochrane Review.

OBJECTIVES

To summarize current evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) concerning the efficacy of different antibiotic treatments for CAP in participants older than 12.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, 2009, issue 1) which contains the Cochrane Acute Respiratory Infections Group's Specialized Register; MEDLINE (January 1966 to February week 2, 2009), and EMBASE (January 1974 to February 2009).

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs in which one or more antibiotics were tested for the treatment of CAP in ambulatory adolescents or adults. Studies testing one or more antibiotics and reporting the diagnostic criteria as well as the clinical outcomes achieved, were considered for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors (LMB, TJMV) independently assessed study reports in the first publication. In this update, LMB performed study selection, which was checked by TJMV and MMK. Study authors were contacted to resolve any ambiguities in the study reports. Data were compiled and analyzed. Differences between review authors were resolved by discussion and consensus.

MAIN RESULTS

Six RCTs assessing five antibiotic pairs (1857 participants aged 12 years and older diagnosed with CAP) were included. The study quality was generally good, with some differences in the extent of the reporting. A variety of clinical, radiological and bacteriological diagnostic criteria and outcomes were reported. Overall, there was no significant difference in the efficacy of the various antibiotics.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Currently available evidence from RCTs is insufficient to make evidence-based recommendations for the choice of antibiotic to be used for the treatment of CAP in ambulatory patients. Pooling of study data was limited by the very low number of studies assessing the same antibiotic pairs. Individual study results do not reveal significant differences in efficacy between various antibiotics and antibiotic groups. Multi-drug comparisons using similar administration schedules are needed to provide the evidence necessary for practice recommendations.

An antimicrobial stewardship program with a focus on reducing fluoroquinolone overuse

The fluoroquinolones have become the leading class of antimicrobial agents prescribed to adults in the United States. Resistance of key pathogens to fluoroquinolones has developed rapidly in parallel with increased prescribing of these drugs. We describe our pharmacist-led antimicrobial stewardship program that focused on reducing inappropriate prescribing of fluoroquinolones, with the goals of limiting the development of resistance and improving patient outcomes. Core strategies were regular monitoring and reporting of resistance trends observed on institutional antibiograms, performing drug audits and related studies with intervention and feedback to prescribers, implementing an automatic parenteral-to-oral conversion program, establishing and implementing a beta-lactam-based institutional guideline for empiric therapy, and educating prescribers. This successful program reduced empiric prescribing of fluoroquinolones by 30%, improved susceptibility for all antipseudomonal agents against Pseudomonas aeruginosa overall by 10%, and decreased mortality associated with P. aeruginosa infections by 2-fold. Our stewardship program clearly demonstrated that pharmacists can take on leadership roles to positively change antimicrobial prescribing at the institutional level and improve patient outcomes.

New semiphysiological absorption model to assess the pharmacodynamic profile of cefuroxime axetil using nonparametric and parametric population pharmacokinetics

Cefuroxime axetil is widely used to treat respiratory tract infections. We are not aware of a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model for cefuroxime axetil. Our objectives were to develop a semiphysiological population PK model and evaluate the pharmacodynamic profile for cefuroxime axetil. Twenty-four healthy volunteers received 250 mg oral cefuroxime as a suspension after a standardized breakfast. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was used for drug analysis, NONMEM and S-ADAPT (results reported) were used for parametric population PK modeling, and NPAG was used for nonparametric population PK modeling. Monte Carlo simulations were used to predict the duration for which the non-protein-bound-plasma concentration was above the MIC (fT(>MIC)). A model with one disposition compartment, a saturable and time-dependent drug release from the stomach, and fast drug absorption from the intestine yielded precise (r > 0.992) and unbiased curve fits and an excellent predictive performance. The apparent clearance was 21.7 liters/h (19.8% coefficient of variation [CV]) and the volume of distribution 38.7 liters (18.3% CV). Robust (>or=90%) probabilities of target attainment (PTAs) were achieved by 250 mg cefuroxime given every 12 h (q12h) or q8h for MICs of <or=0.375 mg/liter or <or=0.5 mg/liter, respectively, for the bacteriostasis target fT(>MIC) of >or=40% and for MICs of <or=0.094 mg/liter or <or=0.375 mg/liter, respectively, for the near-maximal-killing target fT(>MIC) of >or=65%. For the >or=40% fT(>MIC) target, the PTAs for 250 mg cefuroxime q12h were >or=97.8% for Streptococcus pyogenes and penicillin-susceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae. Cefuroxime at 250 mg q12h or q8h achieved PTAs below 73% or 92%, respectively, for Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and penicillin-intermediate S. pneumoniae for susceptibility data from various countries. Depending on the MIC distribution, 250 mg oral cefuroxime q8h instead of q12h should be considered, especially for more-severe infections that require near-maximal killing by cefuroxime.

A Review of Levofloxacin for the Treatment of Bacterial Infections

Completing its initial phases of drug development in the mid 1990s as the one of the first fluoroquinolones that could be used with confidence to treat respiratory tract infections, levofloxacin went on to become one of the most widely prescribed antibiotics in the world. Available in both oral (po) and intravenous (IV) formulations and with characteristics of over 90% bioavailability, distribution into both extracellular and intracellular pulmonary compartments, highly predictable pharmacokinetics with over 90% of the drug being excreted unchanged in urine, and reliable activity against a broad spectrum of clinically important pathogens, levofloxacin has been used successfully to treat patients with a variety of serious infectious diseases as well as common infections most often treated outside of the hospital setting. Results of clinical trials involving patients with respiratory tract, urinary tract, and skin infections have consistently shown rates of clinical success and bacteriological eradication that were comparable to other widely used broad-spectrum agents. Regimens of levofloxacin, initially involving total daily doses of 250 mg to 500 mg, but more recently regimens involving 750 mg doses, have been shown to be safe and effective. Nearly a decade and a half of clinical experience has defined a safety and tolerability profile that permits data-driven assessment of the risks and benefits of using levofloxacin. As resistance to currently available fluoroquinolones has emerged, the clinical value of levofloxacin deserves continued evaluation. However, consistently high rates of susceptibility of clinically important bacteria, especially among those bacteria that commonly cause respiratory tract infections, such as Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae, suggest that this agent will continue to be a widely used well past the 20-year anniversary of its introduction into the antibacterial armamentarium.

Levofloxacin for the treatment of pneumonia caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae including multidrug-resistant strains: pooled analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the clinical and microbiologic efficacy of levofloxacin for the treatment of subjects with pneumonia caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) Streptococcus pneumoniae (MDRSP) and non-MDRSP strains.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A pooled analysis was conducted using data from ten clinical studies in pneumonia: five comparative studies and five noncomparative studies conducted from 1992 to 2002. This analysis included data from levofloxacin-treated subjects with S. pneumoniae isolated at study entry. Susceptibility of S. pneumoniae isolated from subjects at study entry was determined against representative agents from five antimicrobial classes: tetracyclines, sulfonamides, second-generation cephalosporins, penicillins, and macrolides. Isolates were classified as MDRSP (based on resistance to two or more antimicrobial classes) or non-MDRSP (intermediate resistance or susceptible to all classes or resistant to 1 antimicrobial class). Clinical and microbiologic efficacy of levofloxacin (i.v., p.o., or i.v./p.o. for 5 to 14 days) in the microbiologically evaluable population was determined at post-therapy; a test for homogeneity of the odds ratio of the difference in clinical success for comparative versus noncomparative studies was performed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS

The main outcome measures were clinical success rates and microbiologic eradication rates of 419 microbiologically evaluable levofloxacin-treated subjects with MDRSP or non-MDRSP. Clinical success rates were 96.3% (52/54) and 95.1% (347/365), respectively (difference -1.2; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -6.7, 4.3). Similarly, per pathogen microbiologic eradication rates for MDRSP and non-MDRSP were 96.3% (52/54) and 95.6% (350/366), respectively (difference -0.7; 95% CI: -6.1, 4.8). Study limitations include the use of data from comparative and noncomparative studies. A test for homogeneity of the odds ratios for clinical success in comparative versus noncomparative studies showed no significant difference (p = 0.27).

CONCLUSIONS

These data support the use of levofloxacin for patients with community-acquired pneumonia caused by S. pneumoniae, including MDR strains.

What can we learn from the time course of untreated and partially treated community-onset Streptococcus pneumoniae pneumonia? A clinical perspective on superiority and noninferiority trial designs for mild community-acquired pneumonia

There are no well-designed placebo-controlled clinical trials in the recent era that precisely define the magnitude of the drug effect of antimicrobial therapy for mild community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). However, there is evidence that ineffective therapies, selected on the basis of the ratio of 24-h area under the concentration curve to minimum inhibitory concentration, associated with a discordant (nonsusceptible in vitro) specific agent (or no therapy) for mild CAP due to Streptococcus pneumoniae are associated with increased risk of progression to serious CAP. The relatively high rate of clinical success associated with appropriate antimicrobial treatment of mild CAP renders a standard outcome measure of clinical success an unlikely way to differentiate new agents. However, there may be an advantage in composite outcome assessments for mild CAP. Composite-outcomes end points that include time to resolution of morbidity, the use of patient reported-outcomes instruments, and biomarkers are recommended for future studies. Because the composite rate of success in recent randomized clinical trials exceeds 90%, it would seem that a noninferiority margin of 10% is reasonable for trials for mild CAP.

Respiratory fluoroquinolones for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

We investigated whether the use of respiratory fluoroquinolones was associated with better clinical outcomes compared with the use of macrolides and beta- lactams among adults with pneumonia.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Current Contents, Scopus, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane with no language restrictions. Two reviewers independently extracted data from published trials that compared fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, gemifloxacin) with macrolides or beta-lactams or both. A meta-analysis was performed with the clinical outcomes of mortality, treatment success and adverse outcomes.

RESULTS

We included 23 trials in our meta-analysis. There was no difference in mortality among patients who received fluoroquinolones or the comparator antibiotics (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.65-1.12). Pneumonia resolved in more patients who received fluoroquinolones compared with the comparator antibiotics for the included outcomes in the intention-to-treat population (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.00-1.36), clinically evaluable population (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.06-1.50) and the microbiologically assessed population (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.28-2.20). Fluoroquinolones were more effective than a combination of beta-lactam and macrolide (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.02-1.90). They were also more effective for patients with severe pneumonia (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.02-3.29), those who required admission to hospital (OR = 1.30, 95% CI 1.04-1.61) and those who required intravenous therapy (OR = 1.44, 15% CI 1.13-1.85). Fluoroquinolones were more effective than beta-lactam and macrolide in open-label trials (OR = 1.35, 95% CI 1.08-1.69) but not in blinded randomized controlled trials (OR = 1.13, 95% CI 0.85-1.50).

INTERPRETATION

Fluoroquinolones were associated with higher success of treatment for severe forms of pneumonia; however, a benefit in mortality was not evident. A randomized controlled trial that includes patients with severe pneumonia with or without bacteremia is needed.

Pediatric respiratory infections by Mycoplasma pneumoniae

Mycoplasma pneumoniae is one of the most common agents of community-acquired pneumonia in children and young adults. Although M. pneumoniae is a small bacterium that can reproduce in an artificial culture medium and is known to be sensitive to certain antibiotics in vitro as well as in vivo, the immunopathogenesis of M. pneumoniae in the human host is not fully understood. The epidemiologic characteristics, including periodic epidemics, and some clinical characteristics of M. pneumoniae are similar to those observed in systemic viral infections. Many experimental and clinical studies have suggested that the pathogenesis of lung injuries in M. pneumoniae infection is associated with a cell-mediated immune reaction, including high responsiveness to corticosteroid therapy. This paper presents an overview of M. pneumoniae infections, with emphasis on epidemiology, pathogenesis and treatment.

Sequential therapy with cefuroxime and cefuroxime-axetil for community-acquired lower respiratory tract infection in the oldest old

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Community acquired lower respiratory tract infection (CALRTI) is the most common infection requiring hospitalization in the elderly. Sequential antibiotic therapy offers the potential for earlier functional rehabilitation, shorter length of hospital stay and lower costs. We studied the efficacy and safety of an empiric sequential antibiotic therapy with cefuroxime-cefuroxime axetil in elderly patients hospitalized with a CALRTI.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized, open-label, in-hospital study of cefuroxime IV 750 mg tid for 10 days (IV group) vs cefuroxime 750 mg IV tid for 3 days, followed by cefuroxime-axetil PO 500 mg bid for 7 days (sequence group), when clinical (symptoms improved and fever disappeared) and/or laboratory response [decrease in C-reactive protein (CRP)] occurred.

RESULTS

A total of 142 patients, 71 (mean age: 83.3 (+/-6 SD), M/F ratio: 1.1) in the IV group, and 71 (mean age: 81.5 (+/-7 SD), M/F ratio: 1.5) in the sequence group, were included in the study. Eighty-three (58.4%) presented with radiologically confirmed pneumonia (CAP) and 59 (41.6%) with non-pneumonic LRTI (NPLRTI) (p=ns between study groups). Treatment was considered effective in 84.5% (60/71) of patients in the IV group and 80.3% (57/71) in the sequence group (p=ns). Therapy failed in 15% (21/142) of the study population (p=ns between study groups) and, after day 3 of therapy, 8.45% (6/71) failed in both study groups. By the end of treatment, two patients had died in each study group, and total in-hospital mortality was 8.5% (12/142, p=ns between study groups). The length of hospital stay (LOS) did not differ between the two study groups.

CONCLUSIONS

When a favorable clinical or biochemical response occurs on day 3 of IV cefuroxime therapy, further therapy with oral cefuroxime-axetil is as effective and safe as a full course of cefuroxime IV in elderly patients hospitalized with CALRTI. However, LOS was not reduced after sequential antibiotic therapy in this population.

Empiric antibiotic coverage of atypical pathogens for community acquired pneumonia in hospitalized adults

BACKGROUND

Community acquired pneumonia (CAP) is caused by various pathogens, traditionally divided to 'typical' and 'atypical'. Initial antibiotic treatment of CAP is usually empirical, customarily covering both typical and atypical pathogens. To date, no sufficient evidence exists to support this broad coverage, while limiting coverage is bound to reduce toxicity, resistance and expense.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and need of adding antibiotic coverage for atypical pathogens in hospitalized patients with CAP, in terms of mortality and successful treatment.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2007, Issue 1) which includes the Acute Respiratory Infection Group's specialized register; MEDLINE (January 1966 to March 2007); and EMBASE (January 1980 to January 2007).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized trials of adult patients hospitalized due to CAP, comparing antibiotic regimens with atypical antibiotic coverage to a regimen without atypical antibiotic coverage.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently appraised the quality of each trial and extracted the data from included trials. Relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated, assuming an intention-to-treat (ITT) basis for the outcome measures.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty five trials were included, encompassing 5244 randomized patients. There was no difference in mortality between the atypical arm and the non-atypical arm (RR 1.15; 95% CI 0.85 to 1.56). The atypical arm showed an insignificant trend toward clinical success and a significant advantage to bacteriological eradication, which disappeared when evaluating methodologically high-quality studies alone. Clinical success for the atypical arm was significantly higher for Legionella pneumophilae (L. pneumophilae) and non-significantly lower for pneumococcal pneumonia. There was no significant difference between the groups in the frequency of (total) adverse events, or those requiring discontinuation of treatment. However, gastrointestinal events were more common in the non-atypical arm (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.99). All but two included trials compared a single atypical antibiotic to a beta-lactam, while no trials assessing the addition of an atypical antibiotic to a beta-lactam were identified.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

No benefit of survival or clinical efficacy was shown to empirical atypical coverage in hospitalized patients with CAP. This conclusion relates mostly to the comparison of quinolone monotherapy to beta-lactams (BL) or cephalosporins. Further trials, comparing BL or cephalosporins therapy to BL or cephalosporins combined with a macrolide in this population, using mortality as its primary outcome, should be performed.

Community-Acquired Pneumonia—Back to Basics

Lower respiratory tract infections are among the most common infectious diseases worldwide and are caused by the inflammation and consolidation of lung tissue due to an infectious agent.¹ The clinical criteria for the diagnosis include chest pain, cough, auscultatory findings such as rales or evidence of pulmonary consolidation, fever, or leukocytosis.

Effect on carotid atherosclerosis of probucol plus levofloxacin for Chlamydia pneumoniae infection

To investigate the effect of levofloxacin on carotid atherosclerosis, patients with hypercholesterolemia whose carotid atherosclerosis was not improved by probucol therapy (500 mg/day) for 24 months were enrolled. All patients were seropositive for anti C. pneumoniae IgA and/or IgG. Carotid atherosclerosis was evaluated by ultrasonic measurement of the maximum intima-media thickness (Max-IMT). All subjects were prescribed three courses of levofloxacin (each course, 400 mg/day for 2 weeks, followed by 14 days off drug treatment). At 12 months after combined therapy with probucol and levofloxacin, Max-IMT was significantly decreased compared with the value before treatment (P < 0.01). These results suggest that the combination therapy was effective for improving carotid atherosclerosis in C. pneumoniae-seropositive patients.

Levofloxacin for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia

New respiratory fluoroquinolones (FQs), such as levofloxacin, offer many improved qualities over older agents, such as ciprofloxacin. These include retaining excellent Gram-negative bacilli activity, with improved Gram-positive activity. New FQ-like levofloxacin possesses greater bioavailabilty and a longer serum half-life compared with ciprofloxacin, allowing for once-daily dosing, which may improve patient adherence. The high bioavailability of levofloxacin allows for rapid step-down from intravenous administration to oral therapy, minimizing unnecessary hospitalization, which may decrease costs and improve patient quality of life. Levofloxacin has been evaluated for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in numerous randomized clinical trials. Most published studies have used the 500 mg dose, although more recent studies have investigated the 750 mg dose once daily. These trials demonstrate that levofloxacin is effective and safe for the treatment of CAP, displaying relatively mild adverse effects that are more or less comparable with ciprofloxacin. Levofloxacin has much to offer in terms of bacterial eradication, including for resistant respiratory pathogens. However, ciprofloxacin-resistant organisms are becoming more prevalent so prudence must be exercised when prescribing this agent.

Effect of quinupristin/dalfopristin on 3T3 and Eahy926 cells in vitro in comparison to other antimicrobial agents with the potential to induce infusion phlebitis

Infusion phlebitis is a common clinical problem that is observed with some antimicrobial agents, when being administered intravenously. In this study, cultured murine fibroblasts and immortalised human endothelial cells were exposed to three antibiotics at clinically relevant concentrations to assess their toxic potential in two established cytotoxicity assays. BALB/c 3T3 fibroblasts and Eahy926 endothelial cells were exposed to quinupristin/dalfopristin (QD), erythromycin and levofloxacin at increasing concentrations. For assessment of cytotoxicity the cells were incubated with neutral red (NR) or stained with crystal violet (CV). Measurements were done by photometry. At the concentration range tested QD and erythromycin showed a concentration-dependent cytotoxic effect in both cell cultures. In 3T3 cells the half-maximal effect concentration (EC50) was 20 mg/l for QD and 340 mg/l for erythromycin in the NR uptake test and 12 and 200 mg/l, respectively, in the CV assay. In Eahy926 cells the EC50 was 50 mg/l for QD and 880 mg/l for erythromycin in the NR uptake test and 40 and 750 mg/l, respectively, in the CV assay. No EC50 could be established in both cell types for levofloxacin. Eahy926 cells were less sensitive to cytotoxic stimuli than 3T3 fibroblasts. Cytotoxic effects in both cell cultures occurred in the following order: QD > erythromycin >> levofloxacin. This ranking correlates well with the frequency of local adverse effects observed with the infusion of these antibiotics in patients. Thus, these in vitro assays may serve as an estimate for the prediction of local tolerability of antibiotics when administered parenterally.

[Antibiotherapy for acute CAP in adults]

Community acquired pneumonia is one of the most frequent infections. With time, bacterial epidemiology and bacterial resistance evolve and new antibiotics become available. So an up-date on adequate antibiotic use is necessary. We reviewed the epidemiology of pneumonia and the evolution of bacterial resistance. We also collected data on new antibiotics which can be used for this infection such as levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, telithromycin, and pristinamycin. All these drugs are effective on bacteria involved in pneumonia. At this time, only few Streptococcus pneumoniae strains have developed resistance to these drugs. However, resistance to fluoroquinolones is not easily detected with common laboratory techniques. There is no effectiveness difference between the 2 new fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin, moxifloxacin) in clinical studies. However, in bacteriological and pharmacological studies, moxifloxacin seems to be more effective than levofloxacin (500 mg/day). For the treatment of pneumonia due to Legionella pneumophila, fluoroquinolones are now widely recommended. For Streptococcus pneumonia, amoxicillin remain the drug of choice, even for bacteria with a decreased susceptibility to penicillin. The importance of treating atypical pathogens remains to be documented.

Comparison of the adverse event profiles of levofloxacin 500 mg and 750 mg in clinical trials for the treatment of respiratory infections

OBJECTIVE

To compare safety data with levofloxacin 500 mg and 750 mg from clinical trials for the treatment of respiratory infections.

METHODS

We compared adverse event data for levofloxacin 500 mg and 750 mg from clinical trials in acute bacterial sinusitis, acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis, and community-acquired pneumonia. Adverse events occurring after the initiation of therapy were classified as treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE); drug-related adverse events (DRAE) were TEAE assessed by the clinical investigator as definitely/very likely or probably related to levofloxacin therapy.

RESULTS

Overall, the safety profile of the two doses was similar but not identical. TEAE occurred in 49.0% (1601/3268) of those treated with 500 mg and in 45.5% (519/1141) of those treated with 750 mg (p = 0.042); the corresponding rates of DRAE were 7.6% (248/3268) and 8.0% (91/1141) (p = 0.699). There was no statistically significant difference in terms of overall TEAE and DRAE rates within each of the three infectious conditions, but there were in specific events, all of which are expected with levofloxacin therapy. The limitations of this analysis include that it utilized a subset of available safety data, that it includes data only from clinical trials, and that we report primarily on events occurring in > or = 2% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Given similar adverse event profiles and the advantages of higher dose therapy, including shorter courses of therapy and potential impact on preventing resistance, clinicians should consider utilizing the 750 mg dose of levofloxacin when choosing between dosage strengths for treatment of indicated infections.

Levofloxacin in the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia

The use of levofloxacin in critically ill patients has progressively increased since commercial marketing of the drug in 1999, despite the fact that few studies have been designed to assess the use of levofloxacin in this population. Pharmacological characteristics, broad spectrum of activity, and tolerability account for the high interest in the drug for the treatment of different infectious diseases, including ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), and the recommendation of levofloxacin in guidelines developed by a number of scientific societies. According to pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic data, it seems reasonable to assume that an increase in activity follows from a larger dose, so that 500 mg/12 h is adequate in patients with VAP. In critically ill patients with VAP, levofloxacin monotherapy is indicated for empirical treatment of patients with early onset pneumonia without risk factors for multiresistant pathogens, and in combination therapy for late onset VAP or for patients at risk for multiresistant pathogens. The use of levofloxacin in combination therapy is supported by multiple reasons, including: increased empirical coverage in infections with suspected intracellular pathogens; substitution for more toxic antimicrobial agents (e.g., aminoglycosides) in patients with renal dysfunction and in those at risk for renal insufficiency; and severity of systemic response to infection (septic shock) that justifies multiple treatment with better tolerated antibiotics. The availability of the oral formulation allows sequential therapy, switching from the intravenous route to the oral route. Levofloxacin is well tolerated by critically ill patients, with few adverse events of mild to moderate severity.

Levofloxacin use in the elderly: focus on pneumonia

Levofloxacin is a broad-spectrum, rapid-acting bactericidal agent that exhibits concentration-dependent killing activity as well as a postantibiotic effect. Its activity includes enteric Gram-negative bacilli, Acinetobacter spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus and most species of streptococci, including Streptococcus pneumoniae. With increasing age, there is a natural decline in renal function by approximately 1 ml/min/year after the age of 30 years, or an average decrease in creatinine clearance of 40% by the age of 80 years. This decline in renal function can have a significant impact on antibiotics that are predominantly eliminated from the body via the kidneys, such as levofloxacin. The favorable pharmacodynamic, safety and efficacy profiles, in addition to in vitro activity versus the usual respiratory pathogens, make levofloxacin among the first-line agents for the management of pneumonia, and an option for other respiratory bacterial infections in which more resistant organisms are a consideration, such as in the elderly population.

Pneumonia due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa: the levofloxacin clinical trials experience

Respiratory infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa present significant treatment challenges, including that of overcoming intrinsic and adaptive resistance by these organisms. The fluoroquinolones may provide an effective option for treating these infections. In this analysis, we report on the efficacy of levofloxacin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and nosocomial pneumonia caused by P. aeruginosa using information from nine clinical studies supported by Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development (Raritan, NJ) or Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical (Raritan, NJ). From these studies, a total of 36 patients were identified with pneumonia caused by P. aeruginosa and treated with levofloxacin (750 mg or 500 mg). For patients diagnosed with nosocomial pneumonia, levofloxacin treatment achieved a 64.7% (11/17) clinical success rate, compared with 41.2% (7/17) with comparator treatment (imipenem/cilastatin followed by ciprofloxacin) in the microbiologically evaluable population. Eradication rates were 58.8% with levofloxacin treatment vs. 29.4% with comparator (95% CI, -64.2 to 5.4). For levofloxacin-treated CAP patients with P. aeruginosa infections (n = 19), clinical success and microbiological eradication rates in the microbiologically evaluable population were 89.5% and 78.9%, respectively. Several limitations of this analysis exist including that this was a retrospective evaluation that pooled data from multiple studies with varying protocols, the number of patients included was limited, and the nosocomial pneumonia patients used adjunctive therapy with an antipseudomonal beta-lactam in most cases. Nonetheless, these findings suggest that levofloxacin may play a role in the treatment of these difficult respiratory infections.

Optimal pharmacological therapy for community-acquired pneumonia: the role of dual antibacterial therapy

The optimal pharmacological therapy of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is one of the most ardently debated issues in medicine. Presently, most guidelines recommend either a fluoroquinolone alone or dual therapy with a third-generation cephalosporin plus a macrolide in patients hospitalised with CAP, but few provide clinicians with specific considerations for selecting from these agents. Despite a similar spectrum of activity and favourable resistance patterns (for fluoroquinolones and third-generation cephalosporins) against CAP pathogens, there is emerging evidence that dual therapy may be superior to monotherapy in certain populations.In patients with non-severe CAP, the evidence supports the use of either monotherapy or dual therapy in most patients; however, patients with severe CAP or bacteraemic pneumococcal CAP experience improved survival when treated with dual therapy. It is unclear from this evidence if any specific combination of agents is the most effective, but the combination of a third-generation cephalosporin plus a macrolide is the most extensively studied. Dual therapy was superior to monotherapy irrespective of the susceptibility of the aetiological pathogen, thus insufficient antimicrobial spectrum does not explain the disparity. The most likely explanation for improved outcomes with dual therapy is the combined effect of optimised antimicrobial spectrum (including atypicals), decreased impact of resistance to a single agent and the immunomodulatory effects of macrolides. Increasing resistance in patients with non-severe CAP warrants the consideration of dual therapy and perhaps a reappraisal of agents usually reserved for second-line therapy, including doxycycline, in these populations as well. In light of the available evidence, dual therapy should be strongly considered in all patients with severe CAP, especially when complicated by pneumococcal bacteraemia.

Clinical experience in the management of community-acquired pneumonia: lessons from the use of fluoroquinolones

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The treatment of CAP has been complicated by several factors, including the expanding spectrum of causative organisms and the rising prevalence of antibiotic resistance among respiratory pathogens. Initial antimicrobial treatment for patients with CAP is usually selected empirically and should provide appropriate coverage against the most common causative organisms, including resistant strains. Respiratory fluoroquinolones, such as levofloxacin, are the only antimicrobials that are highly active against the pathogens most frequently implicated in CAP, including macrolide-resistant and penicillin-resistant pneumococci, Haemophilus influenzae, Legionella spp., and atypical agents. This paper reviews recent studies involving adult patients with CAP that suggest that levofloxacin, as compared with other conventional antibiotic treatments, may be associated with better clinical outcomes.

Highlights on the appropriate use of fluoroquinolones in respiratory tract infections

The impact of respiratory infections on public health is increasing, and lower respiratory tract infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Moreover, most antibiotic prescriptions are related to respiratory infections and this is probably one of the main determinants of the increasing rate of bacterial resistance in both community and hospital settings. This has been the catalyst for the development of new drugs, such as the new fluoroquinolones. The new fluoroquinolones have an excellent spectrum providing cover for the most important respiratory pathogens, including atypical and "typical" pathogens. The pharmacokinetic and dynamic properties of the new fluoroquinolones have a significant impact on their clinical and bacteriological efficacy. They cause a concentration-dependent killing with a sustained post-antibiotic effect. Fluoroquinolones combine exceptional efficacy with cost-effectiveness. Not surprisingly, different guidelines have inserted these agents among the drugs of choice in the empirical therapy of LRTIs. This review discusses the most recent data on the bacteriological and clinical activity of the new fluoroquinolones and critically analyses the risks of a potential overuse of this valuable new class of drugs.

Comparison of gatifloxacin and levofloxacin administered at various dosing regimens to hospitalised patients with community-acquired pneumonia: pharmacodynamic target attainment study using North American surveillance data for Streptococcus pneumoniae

This work aimed at determining the target attainment potential of gatifloxacin and levofloxacin in specific age-related patient populations such as elderly (> or =65 years) versus younger (<65 years) hospitalised patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Previously described population pharmacokinetic models of gatifloxacin and levofloxacin administration in patients with serious CAP were utilised to simulate gatifloxacin and levofloxacin pharmacokinetics. Pharmacokinetic simulations and susceptibility data for Streptococcus pneumoniae from the ongoing national surveillance study, Canadian Respiratory Organism Susceptibility Study (CROSS), were then used to produce pharmacodynamic indices of free-drug area under the curve over 24h relative to the minimum inhibitory concentration (free-drug AUC(0-24)/MIC(all)). Monte Carlo simulations were then used to analyse target attainment both of gatifloxacin and levofloxacin to achieve free-drug AUC(0-24)/MIC(all)> or =30 against S. pneumoniae in patients with CAP. Dosing regimens for gatifloxacin were 400 mg once daily (qd) administered to younger patients (<65 years) and gatifloxacin 200 mg qd to elderly patients (> or =65 years). Dosing regimens for levofloxacin were simulated as 500 mg, 750 mg and 1000 mg qd administered to elderly patients as well as younger patients. Monte Carlo simulations using gatifloxacin 400mg against S. pneumoniae yielded probabilities of achieving free-drug AUC(0-24)/MIC(all) of 30 of 96.6% for all patients, 92.3% for younger patients and 97.7% for elderly patients. When administered to elderly patients, a reduced dose of gatifloxacin 200mg qd could achieve a target attainment potential of 91.4%. Monte Carlo simulation using levofloxacin 500 mg qd yielded probabilities of achieving free-drug AUC(0-24)/MIC(all) of 30 of 92.3% for all patients, 95.7% for elderly patients compared with 72.7% for younger patients. Using levofloxacin 750 mg and 1000 mg qd had probabilities of achieving free-drug AUC(0-24)/MIC(all) of 30 of 97.0% and 98.3%, 98.1% and 99.2%, and 90.1% and 95.2% for all patients, elderly patients and younger patients, respectively. The probability of achieving free-drug AUC(0-24)/MIC(all) of 100 was low both with gatifloxacin and levofloxacin, except in the case of elderly patients receiving levofloxacin in a dose of 1000 mg qd (78.5%). We conclude that gatifloxacin and levofloxacin pharmacokinetics in elderly patients with CAP are markedly different from those of younger patients. Higher gatifloxacin/levofloxacin AUC and longer half-life (t(1/2)) values in elderly patients with CAP compared with younger patients provide better pharmacodynamic parameters (free-drug AUC(0-24)/MIC) leading to a higher probability of pharmacodynamic target attainment and improved bacteriological outcome against S. pneumoniae. Gatifloxacin 400mg qd results in a high probability of target attainment and improved bacteriological outcome against S. pneumoniae both in young and elderly CAP patients. However, gatifloxacin administered at a lowered dose of 200 mg qd in elderly patients could still be successful in producing a favourable antibacterial effect. Levofloxacin administered at a dose of 750 mg qd results in a high probability of target attainment and improved bacteriological outcome against S. pneumoniae in all patients with CAP.

Comparison between pathogen directed antibiotic treatment and empirical broad spectrum antibiotic treatment in patients with community acquired pneumonia: a prospective randomised study

BACKGROUND

There is much controversy about the ideal approach to the management of community acquired pneumonia (CAP). Recommendations differ from a pathogen directed approach to an empirical strategy with broad spectrum antibiotics.

METHODS

In a prospective randomised open study performed between 1998 and 2000, a pathogen directed treatment (PDT) approach was compared with an empirical broad spectrum antibiotic treatment (EAT) strategy according to the ATS guidelines of 1993 in 262 hospitalised patients with CAP. Clinical efficacy was primarily determined by the length of hospital stay (LOS). Secondary outcome parameters for clinical efficacy were assessment of therapeutic failure on antibiotics, 30 day mortality, duration of antibiotic treatment, resolution of fever, side effects, and quality of life.

RESULTS

Three hundred and three patients were enrolled in the study; 41 were excluded, leaving 262 with results available for analysis. No significant differences were found between the two treatment groups in LOS, 30 day mortality, clinical failure, or resolution of fever. Side effects, although they did not have a significant influence on the outcome parameters, occurred more frequently in patients in the EAT group than in those in the PDT group (60% v 17%, 95% CI -0.5 to -0.3; p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

An EAT strategy with broad spectrum antibiotics for the management of hospitalised patients with CAP has comparable clinical efficacy to a PDT approach.

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, retrospective comparison of 5- and 10-day regimens of levofloxacin in a subgroup of patients aged ≥65 years with community-acquired pneumonia

OBJECTIVE

This subgroup analysis sought to determine the efficacy and tolerability of a 5-day regimen of levofloxacin 750 mg/d compared with a 10-day regimen of levofloxacin 500 mg/d in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in elderly patients (aged > or =65 years).

METHODS

This subgroup analysis was based on the outcomes in patients aged > or =65 years from a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial conducted at 70 US centers. Patients in Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) class I/II and III/IV were randomized to receive levofloxacin 750 mg/d for 5 days or levofloxacin 500 mg/d for 10 days. Study investigators assessed clinical and microbiologic outcomes 7 to 14 days after administration of the last dose of medication and collected adverse events for 30 days after the last dose.

RESULTS

This analysis included 177 elderly patients, 80 receiving levofloxacin 750 mg/d for 5 days and 97 receiving levofloxacin 500 mg/d for 10 days. Although most demographic and baseline clinical characteristics were comparable between the 2 groups, the group that received levofloxacin 500 mg/d was older than the group that received levofloxacin 750 mg/d (median age, 76.0 vs 72.5 years, respectively; P = 0.029) and had a higher mean PSI score (90.7 vs 83.1; P = 0.017). Despite the halved duration of therapy, unadjusted clinical success rates were comparable between the 2 groups (89.0% and 91.9% in the 750- and 500-mg arms, respectively; 95% CI, -7.1 to 12.7). Microbiologic eradication rates were 90.3% (28/31) in the 750-mg arm and 87.5% (14/16) in the 500-mg arm (P = NS). Multivariate analysis adjusting for baseline PSI score indicated that treatment assignment was not statistically associated with clinical success (adjusted odds ratio for clinical success with 500-mg dose, 1.92; 95% CI, 0.62 to 5.99). The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events did not differ between the 2 study treatments. The most common adverse events in both groups were insomnia, constipation, and headache.

CONCLUSIONS

This subgroup analysis found that levofloxacin 750 mg/d for 5 days was well tolerated in the treatment of CAP in elderly patients. Undajusted and adjusted rates of clinical success were statistically similar between levofloxacin 750 mg/d for 5 days and levofloxacin 500 mg/d for 10 days.

Value of intensive diagnostic microbiological investigation in low- and high-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia

In a prospective study to evaluate the diagnostic yield of different microbiological tests in hospitalised patients with community-acquired pneumonia, material for microbiological investigation was obtained from 262 patients. Clinical samples consisted of the following: sputum for Gram staining, culture, and detection of pneumococcal antigen; blood for culture and serological tests; urine for detection of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 antigen and pneumococcal antigen; and specimens obtained by fiberoptic bronchoscopy. A pathogen was identified in 158 (60%) patients, with Streptococcus pneumoniae (n=97) being the most common causative agent of community-acquired pneumonia. In 82% of the 44 patients with an adequate sputum specimen, a positive Gram stain was confirmed by positive sputum culture. S. pneumoniae infections were detected principally when adequate sputum specimens were examined by Gram stain and culture and when adequate and inadequate sputum specimens were tested for the presence of pneumococcal antigen (n=58; 60%). The urinary pneumococcal antigen test was the most valuable single test for detection of S. pneumoniae infections (n=52; 54%) when sputum pneumococcal antigen determination was not performed. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy was of additive diagnostic value in 49% of the patients who did not expectorate sputum and in 52% of those in whom treatment failed. Investigation of sputum by a combination of Gram stain, culture, and detection of pneumococcal antigen was the most useful means of establishing an aetiological diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia, followed by testing of urine for pneumococcal antigen. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy may be of additional value when treatment failure occurs.

Principles of antibiotic treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in the outpatient setting

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a common illness with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Nearly 80% of the treatment for this condition is provided in the outpatient setting. Among the etiologic agents associated with bacterial CAP, the predominant pathogen is Streptococcus pneumoniae. Treatment of CAP for the most part is empirical; therefore, any antibiotic treatment should cover both typical and atypical pathogens. The beta-lactams have historically been considered standard therapy for the treatment of CAP. However, the impact of rising resistance rates is now a primary concern facing physicians. For patients with comorbidities or recent antibiotic therapy, current guidelines recommend either combination therapy with a beta-lactam and a macrolide or an antipneumococcal fluoroquinolone alone. Fluoroquinolones are broad-spectrum antibiotics that exhibit high levels of penetration into the lungs and low levels of resistance. Evidence from clinical trials indicates clinical success rates of > 90% for moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin, and levofloxacin in the treatment of CAP due to S pneumoniae. Data from comparative clinical trials suggest fluoroquinolone monotherapy is as efficacious as beta-lactam-macrolide combination therapy in the treatment of CAP patients. The respiratory fluoroquinolone levofloxacin has also been shown to be effective in CAP patients for the treatment of macrolide-resistant S pneumoniae. The use of azithromycin, telithromycin, and fluoroquinolones in short-course regimens has been shown to be efficacious, safe, and tolerable in patients with CAP. Based on clinical evidence, high-dose, short-course therapies may represent a significant advance in the management of CAP.

Comparison of Levofloxacin and Cefotaxime Combined With Ofloxacin for ICU Patients With Community-Acquired Pneumonia Who Do Not Require Vasopressors

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of levofloxacin (L) as monotherapy in patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in comparison with therapy using a combination of cefotaxime (C) plus ofloxacin (O).

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized 1:1, comparative, open, parallel-group study.

SETTING

Multinational study with 149 sites.

PATIENTS

A total of 398 randomized patients who had been admitted to the ICU with severe CAP without shock, including 308 patients in a modified intent-to-treat population and 271 patients in the per-protocol (PP) population (L group, 139 patients; C + O group, 132 patients).

INTERVENTIONS

Therapy with levofloxacin (500 mg IV, q12h) vs therapy with a C + O combination (C, 1g IV, q8h; O, 200 mg IV, q12h) for 10 to 14 days.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

The main end point was the clinical efficacy at the end of treatment (ie, the test-of-cure [TOC] visit). The statistical hypothesis was the noninferiority of L therapy to C + O therapy with a 2.5% alpha risk (unilateral) and a 15% maximum set difference. At the TOC visit, a clinical success was observed in 79.1% of patients (L group) and 79.5% of patients (C + O group) in the PP population (difference, -0.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -10.79 to 9.97% without adjustment for simplified acute physiology score [SAPS] II at inclusion; difference, -0.3%; 95% CI, -10.13 to 9.58% with adjustment for SAPS II). A satisfactory bacteriologic response was present in 73.7% of L group patients and 77.5% of C + O group patients, including responses of 75.7% and 70.3%, respectively, in the L group and C + O group in the Streptococcus pneumoniae-documented population. In the safety analysis, 20 patients in the L group (10.3%) and 16 patients in the C + O group (8.0%) experienced at least one adverse event that was considered to be treatment-related.

CONCLUSION

L therapy was at least as effective as the combination therapy of C + O in the treatment of a subset of patients with CAP requiring ICU admission. This conclusion cannot be extrapolated to patients requiring mechanical ventilation or vasopressors (ie, those patients in shock).

Influence of inoculum size of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa on in vitro activities and in vivo efficacy of fluoroquinolones and carbapenems

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the effect of inoculum size on MIC, bactericidal activity and the post-antibiotic effect (PAE) of carbapenems (imipenem, panipenem and meropenem) and injectable quinolones (pazufloxacin and ciprofloxacin) against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and also the relationship between in vivo systemic infection by changing the inoculum size injected in mice.

RESULTS

Increasing the bacterial inoculum (10(5)-10(8) cfu/mL) had no significant effect on the MIC of any of the tested antimicrobial agents. With the standard inocula (10(6) cfu/mL) of both test strains, all the antimicrobial agents showed bactericidal activity; however, increasing the inoculum size to >10(8) cfu/mL resulted in a reduction in bactericidal activity of all the antimicrobial agents against S. aureus Smith. In contrast, increasing the inoculum size of P. aeruginosa exerted only a minimal influence on the bactericidal activity of fluoroquinolones, but resulted in a reduction in the bactericidal activity of carbapenems. With the standard inoculum size of S. aureus Smith, pre-incubation with fluoroquinolones and carbapenems, except for meropenem, was sufficient to produce PAEs. When the inoculum was increased, the duration of the PAEs of these antimicrobial agents was reduced; however, those of fluoroquinolones were longer than carbapenems. Inoculum size had a greater influence on the in vivo efficacy of carbapenems than that of fluoroquinolones.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that decreased bactericidal activity, or the in vitro PAE of carbapenems and fluoroquinolones, is related to the reduced in vivo protective effect against infection caused by high inoculum with S. aureus or P. aeruginosa.

Empiric antibiotic coverage of atypical pathogens for community acquired pneumonia in hospitalized adults

BACKGROUND

Community acquired pneumonia (CAP) is caused by various pathogens, traditionally divided to 'typical' and 'atypical'. Initial antibiotic treatment of CAP is usually empirical, customarily covering both typical and atypical pathogens. To date, no sufficient evidence exists to support this broad coverage, while limiting coverage is bound to reduce toxicity, resistance and expense.

OBJECTIVES

Assess the efficacy and need of adding antibiotic coverage for atypical pathogens in hospitalized patients with CAP, in terms of mortality and successful treatment.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2005) which includes the Acute Respiratory Infection Group's specialized register; MEDLINE (January 1966 to January Week 2 2005); and EMBASE (January 1980 to January Week 2 2005).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized trials of adult patients hospitalized due to CAP, comparing antibiotic regimens with atypical antibiotic coverage to a regimen without atypical antibiotic coverage.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently appraised the quality of each trial and extracted the data from included trials. Relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated, assuming an intention-to-treat (ITT) basis for the outcome measures.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty four trials were included, encompassing 5015 randomized patients. There was no difference in mortality between the atypical arm and the non-atypical arm (RR 1.13; 95% CI 0.82 to 1.54). The atypical arm showed an insignificant trend toward clinical success and a significant advantage to bacteriological eradication, which disappeared when evaluating methodologically high-quality studies alone. Clinical success for the atypical arm was significantly higher for Legionella pneumophilae (L. pneumophilae) and non-significantly lower for pneumococcal pneumonia. There was no significant difference between the groups in the frequency of (total) adverse events, or those requiring discontinuation of treatment. However, gastrointestinal events were more common in the non-atypical arm (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.99).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

No benefit of survival or clinical efficacy was shown to empirical atypical coverage in hospitalized patients with CAP. This conclusion relates mostly to the comparison of quinolone monotherapy to non-atypical monotherapy. Further trials, comparing beta-lactam (BL) or cephalosporin therapy to BL or cephalosporin combined with a macrolide in this population, using mortality as its primary outcome, should be performed.

Comparative activity of quinolones, macrolides and ketolides against Legionella species using in vitro broth dilution and intracellular susceptibility testing

The comparative in vitro activity of quinolones (trovafloxacin, gemifloxacin, levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, moxifloxacin and grepafloxacin), ketolides (ABT-773 and telithromycin) and macrolides (clarithromycin, azithromycin and erythromycin) were evaluated against Legionella pneumophila by broth dilution and an HL-60 intracellular model. The MIC90 of the quinolones, clarithromycin and ABT-773 were more than eight times lower than for erythromycin. Telithromycin, ABT-773 and azithromycin had significantly greater intracellular activity against L. pneumophila than erythromycin at 1xMIC and 8xMIC. The rank order of intracellular activity against L. pneumophila serogroup 1 was quinolones>ketolides>macrolides. Clinical trials to determine the clinical efficacy of ketolides for the treatment of Legionnaires' disease are warranted.

Antimicrobial Chemotherapy for Legionnaires Disease: Levofloxacin versus Macrolides

BACKGROUND

The community outbreak of legionnaires disease that occurred in Murcia, Spain, in July 2001--to our knowledge, the largest such outbreak ever reported--afforded an unusual opportunity to compare the clinical response of patients with Legionella pneumonia treated with levofloxacin with that of patients treated with macrolides and to determine the role of rifampicin combined with levofloxacin in treating severe legionellosis.

METHODS

An observational, prospective, nonrandomized study was conducted involving 292 patients seen at our hospital (Hospital "J. M. Morales Meseguer"; Murcia, Spain) who received a diagnosis of Legionella pneumonia during the Murcia outbreak. To compare both antibiotic regimens (macrolides vs. levofloxacin), patients were stratified by the severity of pneumonia. Duration of fever, clinical outcome, complications, side effects, and length of hospital stay were recorded. To assess the potential effects of adjuvant therapy with rifampicin, 45 case patients treated with levofloxacin plus rifampicin were evaluated and compared with 45 control pairs who were treated with levofloxacin alone.

RESULTS

With the exception of 2 patients who died, all patients were cured. There were no significant differences between treatment groups in clinical outcome for patients with mild-to-moderate pneumonia. Nevertheless, in patients with severe pneumonia, levofloxacin exerted superior activity; it was associated with fewer complications (3.4% of patients receiving levofloxacin experienced complications, compared with 27.2% of patients receiving macrolides; P=.02) and shorter mean hospital stays (5.5 vs. 11.3 days; P=.04). Addition of rifampicin to the treatment regimen for patients receiveing levofloxacin for severe pneumonia provides no additional benefit.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings strongly suggest that monotherapy with levofloxacin is a safe and effective treatment for legionnaires disease, including in patients with severe disease. In these patients, levofloxacin appears to be more effective than clarithromycin.

Host-pathogen relationships among Escherichia coli isolates recovered from men with febrile urinary tract infection

BACKGROUND

Host-pathogen relationships in men with febrile urinary tract infection (FUTI) are poorly understood.

METHODS

Phylogenetic background, extended virulence genotypes, and serotypes were determined for 70 Escherichia coli isolates recovered from urine samples obtained from men with FUTI for comparison with available data for 70 E. coli rectal isolates recovered from uninfected men. Bacterial traits were assessed in relation to underlying host characteristics (age, compromise status, and history of urinary tract infection) and acute manifestations (bacteremia, flank pain, and serum prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level).

RESULTS

Compared with rectal isolates, FUTI isolates exhibited a significantly higher prevalence of virulence-associated phylogenetic groups, serotypes, and extraintestinal virulence genes. The latter included traditional prostatitis-associated traits (e.g., hemolysin and cytotoxic necrotizing factor), as well as unconventional traits, such as outer membrane protease T. These bacterial traits occurred largely independent of host age, urological compromise status, urinary tract infection history, and acute manifestations. However, certain traits were less prevalent in association with use of urinary tract instrumentation and significantly predicted elevated PSA levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Considerable virulence capability may be required for an E. coli strain to cause FUTI in men, regardless of whether most compromising conditions are present. Bacterial traits that promote prostatic invasion may be relevant for the pathogenesis of FUTI, even among men without classic manifestations of acute prostatitis.

Pharmacodynamic target attainment analysis against Streptococcus pneumoniae using levofloxacin 500 mg, 750 mg and 1000 mg once daily in plasma (P) and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) of hospitalized patients with community acquired pneumonia (CAP)

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of levofloxacin in patients with respiratory infections such as community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) are poorly documented. This work aimed at assessing the pharmacodynamic target attainment against Streptococcus pneumoniae using levofloxacin 500 mg, 750 mg and 1000 mg administered once daily in plasma (P) and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) of hospitalized patients with community acquired pneumonia. The pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin in elderly (>/=65 years) compared with younger patients (<65 years) hospitalized with CAP were simulated. Susceptibility data with S. pneumoniae from our ongoing national surveillance study (Canadian Respiratory Organism Susceptibility Study-CROSS) were then used to produce pharmacodynamic indices of AUC(0-24)/MIC(all.) Monte Carlo simulations were then used to analyse target attainment of levofloxacin using doses of 500 mg, 750 mg and 1000 mg once daily to achieve free drug AUC(0-24)/MIC(all) >/= 30-100 versus S. pneumoniae in patients with CAP. Pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin simulated after 500 mg, 750 mg and 1000 mg once daily dosing resulted in levofloxacin volume of distribution: elderly patients = younger patients, while levofloxacin clearance was: elderly patients < younger patients. Levofloxacin t(1/2) values were longer in elderly patients (9.8 +/- 2.5h) than younger patients with CAP (7.4 +/- 2.5h). Free levofloxacin AUC(0-24) as well as AUC(0-24)/MIC(all) for S. pneumoniae were higher in elderly patients than younger patients. Monte Carlo simulation using levofloxacin 500 mg yielded probabilities of achieving free-drug AUC(0-24)/MIC(all) of 30 in P and ELF (95.7% and 98.1%) in elderly and younger patients (72.7% and 80.6%) respectively. Levofloxacin 750 mg and 1000 mg once daily had probability of achieving free-drug AUC(0-24)/MIC(all) of 30 in P/ELF of 98.1%/98.6% and 99.2%/99.0%, respectively, in elderly patients compared with 89.9%/94.1% and 95.2%/96.5%, respectively, for younger patients. Probability of achieving of AUC(0-24)/MIC(all) of 100 in P or ELF was very low in both patient populations at different doses except in the case of elderly patients receiving levofloxacin in a dose of 1000 mg once daily P/ELF of 78.5%/87.0%. We conclude that levofloxacin pharmacokinetics in elderly patients with CAP are markedly different from those of younger patients. Levofloxacin 750 mg OD provides high probabilities of achieving free-drug AUC(0-24)/MIC(all) of 30 in both plasma and epithelial lining fluid in patients with CAP including younger patients. Levofloxacin 500 mg OD provides high probabilities of achieving free-drug AUC(0-24)/MIC(all) of 30 in elderly patients with CAP, although we favour the 750 mg dosing in these patients as well. Levofloxacin 750 mg OD results in high probability of pharmacodynamic target attainment and improved bacteriological outcome against S. pneumoniae in patients with CAP.

Levofloxacin in the treatment of pneumonia in intensive care unit patients

In this study, we analyzed 302 patients with pneumonia admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) who were treated with levofloxacin (LFX) either as monotherapy or combined therapy. Pneumonia was classified as community-acquired in 220 (73%) patients, extra-ICU nosocomial-acquired in 43 (14%), and intra-ICU nosocomial-acquired in 39 (13%) patients. Treatment with LFX was used empirically in 85.7% of the cases. Initial doses of LFX were 500 mg every 24 h in 48.5% of the cases and 500 mg every 12 hours in 48.3%. Treatment was maintained for a mean (SD) of 12.6 (21.9) days. Treatment began as monotherapy in 116 (38.4%) patients and as combination therapy in 186 (61.6%). The factors that influenced the choice of combined treatment were septic shock (odds ratio [OR] 3.03; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.50-6.12) and the presence of two or more extrinsic factors (OR 1.83; 95% CI 1.04-3.23), while young age was a variable associated with monotherapy (OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.96-0.99). An etiological diagnosis was made in 61.6% of the cases. LFX administration was changed from the intravenous route to oral administration in 85 (28.6%) patients. Satisfactory clinical response (cure and improvement) was achieved in 69.4% of the community-acquired pneumonia, in 55.8% of the extra-ICU nosocomial infection, and in 78.3% of the intra-ICU nosocomial infection. The overall mortality rate was 31.5%. Variables associated with death during ICU stay were combined therapy (OR 3.07; 95% CI 1.23-7.65), septic shock (OR 3.49; 95% CI 1.30-9.39), or therapeutic failure (OR 32.6; 95% CI 13.5-78.9). A total of 15% of the patients experienced adverse effects possibly or probably related the antibiotic given.

Role of beta-lactam agents in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a common illness associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The beta-lactam antibacterial agents have been the mainstay of therapy for CAP for over four decades and remain as first-line therapy. However, the impact of the substantial prevalence of resistance seen among the common respiratory pathogens, particularly penicillin and macrolide resistance among Streptococcus pneumoniae, is now an area for concern. CAP treatment guidelines often recommend the use of a macrolide or fluoroquinolone in conjunction with, or as an alternative to, beta-lactam agents, but whether this is necessary is uncertain. This review outlines the historical use of beta-lactam antibacterial agents in the treatment of CAP along with their ongoing therapeutic utility.

Diagnostic test for etiologic agents of community-acquired pneumonia

Diagnostic tests for the detection of the etiologic agent of pneumonia are neither recommended nor done for most outpatients with CAP (Table 4).Most of these patients have no clear diagnosis but seem to do well with empiric antibiotic treatment, which often costs less than the diagnostic tests. For hospitalized patients, a pre-treatment blood culture and an expectorated sputum gram stain and culture should be done. Testing for Legionella spp is appropriate in hospitalized patients, especially those who are seriously ill. New tests that merit use in selected patients are the urinary antigen assay for S pneumoniae and the PCR test for L pneumophila. Anticipated developments in the near future are PCR tests for detection of C pneumoniae and M pneumoniae.

Levofloxacin versus ceftriaxone plus clarithromycin in the treatment of adults with community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization

Consecutive adult patients admitted to the hospital with community-acquired pneumonia from January 2000 to September 2003 were included in this prospective observational cohort study. A total of 459 patients, 259 treated with levofloxacin in single drug therapy at a dose of 500 mg once a day and 209 with the combination of ceftriaxone plus clarithromycin at a dose of 2 g once a day and 500 mg every 12 h, respectively, were included. The hospital admission decision was made using a clinical guideline based on the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI). Fifteen (6%) patients died in the group treated with levofloxacin in single drug therapy and 25 (12%) in the group treated with ceftriaxone plus clarithromycin (P = 0.024). The mortality differences between both treatment groups, adjusted by the PSI score, show an OR of 0.39 (95% CI 0.17-0.87). There were no statistically significant differences between the duration of treatments or hospital stay. These data suggest that levofloxacin as single drug therapy is more effective than the combination of ceftriaxone plus clarithromycin in the treatment of moderate to severe pneumonia that requires hospitalization.

Short-Course Antimicrobial Therapy for Community-Acquired Pneumonia

Management of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) remains surprisingly controversial. Optimal duration of antimicrobial therapy reflects one of the open questions due to the lack of sufficient randomized clinical trial data. Recently, there have been efforts to rationalize antimicrobial therapy of this disease. Trials addressing the issue of short-course antimicrobial therapy for CAP have revealed no adverse outcomes with a treatment duration of 5 days when compared with conventional courses of 7-10 days. There is accumulating evidence that a shorter duration of antimicrobial therapy may have benefits in patients with CAP, as it might enhance compliance, decrease the development of antimicrobial resistance, decrease the incidence and shorten the duration of adverse drug effects, reduce treatment costs and improve patient satisfaction with therapy. Nevertheless, remaining questions regarding the influence of patient selection, disease severity or choice of antimicrobial for short-course therapy indicate the need for further randomized controlled clinical trials in this area of research. This article summarizes current evidence for short-course therapy in patients with CAP and draws conclusions for clinical practice.

Advances in the management of Chlamydia pneumoniae infections

One of the major characteristics of Chlamydia spp. is its ability to cause prolonged, often subclinical infections. Chronic, persistent infection with Chlamydia pneumoniae has been implicated in the pathogenesis of several chronic diseases initially not thought to be infectious, including asthma, arthritis and atherosclerosis. C. pneumoniae is susceptible in vitro to a wide range of antimicrobial agents that target either protein or DNA synthesis, including macrolides, ketolides, tetracyclines, quinolones and rifamycins. Practically all treatment studies evaluating presented or published to date have used serology alone for diagnosis of C. pneumoniae infection, which only provides a clinical end point. The results of several treatment studies that did perform culture found that erythromycin, azithromycin (Zithromax, clarithromycin (Biaxin, levofloxacin (Levaquin and moxifloxacin (Avelox had a 70 to 90% efficacy in eradicating C. pneumoniae from the respiratory tract of children and adults with pneumonia. Persistence of the organism does not appear to be due to the development of antibiotic resistance. However, one cannot extrapolate from this experience to the treatment of chronic C. pneumoniae infection, especially cardiovascular disease. As there are no reliable serologic markers for chronic or persistent C. pneumoniae infection, it cannot be determined who is infected and who is not, which means that it cannot be assumed that any effect seen is due to successful treatment or eradication of C. pneumoniae.

Management of acute bronchitis in healthy adults

Acute respiratory infections (ARIs) are the most common infections in humans, accounting for half of all acute conditions each year in the United States. Acute bronchitis episodes represent a significant portion of these illnesses. This article focuses on acute bronchitis in otherwise healthy individuals.

Community-acquired pneumonia: new management strategies for evolving pathogens and antimicrobial susceptibilities

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is still one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity. The most common bacterial cause of CAP is Streptococcus pneumoniae. The increase in antimicrobial resistance has raised concerns about the efficacy of available therapies, and a call for the reassessment of both existing and newer therapeutic agents. Although microbiological breakpoints are useful for monitoring the emergence of resistance, the current National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) guidelines make no distinction between clinical and microbiological breakpoints. Recent changes in NCCLS breakpoints for extended spectrum cephalosporins have provided a more meaningful approach to susceptibility testing and to consideration of the site of infection. Further controversy surrounds the clinical guidelines relating to CAP in terms of which antimicrobial agents should be given empirically to which types of patients. Within this review, the role of monotherapy versus the need for combination antimicrobial therapy, which often includes a macrolide and an extended spectrum cephalosporin such as ceftriaxone, is discussed. This review also discusses the various aspects of antimicrobial susceptibilities of S. pneumoniae, the drivers and influences of increasing resistance, the clinical relevance of this resistance and possible therapeutic options in the face of changing susceptibilities and mixed bacterial aetiologies. New guidelines from the IDSA attempt to embrace these changes.

Issues in Clinical Trials of Prophylaxis of Fungal Infections

The validity of the results of a clinical trial is highly dependent upon the design of the trial. The definition of disease, the selection criteria for enrollment in the trial, the selection of the study and control drugs, and the end points all affect whether the information obtained from the trial ultimately is useful in making decisions in clinical practice. These factors all apply to the design of clinical trials of the prophylaxis of infectious diseases. In addition, prophylaxis trials have several important differences from the design of trials of the treatment of those same diseases. The risk-benefit analysis for trials of prophylaxis is different, in that asymptomatic patients are exposed to the drug and more patients will be exposed than will develop the disease under study. Standardization of the design of such clinical trials will allow more efficient development of new drugs and will allow clinicians to compare more accurately the safety and efficacy of prophylactic agents.