Preoperative aspiration culture for preoperative diagnosis of infection in total hip or knee arthroplasty

Serum and Synovial Fluid Interleukin-6 for the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection

A gold standard for diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) has not yet been established. The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of serum and synovial fluid interleukin (IL)-6 levels for PJI. The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for studies describing PJI diagnosis using serum and synovial fluid IL-6 and published between January 1990 and October 2016. Seventeen studies were included in the analysis. The pooled sensitivities of serum and synovial fluid IL-6 were 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.63–0.80) and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.82–0.96), respectively. The pooled specificities of serum and synovial fluid IL-6 were 0.89 (95% CI: 0.77–0.95) and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.84–0.95), respectively. The pooled diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) of serum and synovial fluid IL-6 were 20 (95% CI: 7–58) and 101 (95% CI: 28–358), respectively, and the pooled areas under the curve (AUCs) were 0.83 (95% CI: 0.79–0.86) and 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94–0.98), respectively. Synovial fluid IL-6 had high diagnostic value for PJI. Although serum IL-6 test was less sensitive than synovial fluid IL-6 test, it may be regularly prescribed for patients with prosthetic failure owing to its high specificity.

Procalcitonin and α-Defensin for Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infections

BACKGROUND

Current methods to diagnose periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) before revision surgery have limited diagnostic accuracy. This meta-analysis was performed to estimate the accuracy of procalcitonin (PCT) and α-defensin for the diagnosis of PJI.

METHODS

Articles on the diagnostic value of PCT or α-defensin for PJI diagnosis were searched in the PubMed database. Sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, the area under the curve of summary receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC), the positive likelihood ratio, and the negative likelihood ratio were calculated to evaluate the diagnostic ability of PCT and the α-defensin test for the diagnosis of PJI.

RESULTS

The pooled sensitivities for detecting PJI using PCT and α-defensin were 0.53 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24-0.80) and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.85-0.99), respectively. The pooled specificities for detecting PJI using PCT and α-defensin were 0.92 (95% CI, 0.45-0.99) and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.89-0.98), respectively. The pooled diagnostic odds ratios for detecting PJI using PCT and α-defensin were 13 (95% CI, 3-70) and 496 (95% CI, 71-3456), respectively. The pooled AUCs for PCT and α-defensin were 0.76 (95% CI, 0.72-0.80) and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.97-0.99), respectively. The positive likelihood ratio and the negative likelihood ratio of PCT were 6.8 (95% CI, 1.0-48.1) and 0.51 (95% CI, 0.31-0.84), respectively, whereas those of α-defensin were 19.6 (95% CI, 8.2-46.8) and 0.04 (95% CI, 0.01-0.17), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Synovial fluid α-defensin has a great potential to diagnose PJI.

Improving the accuracy of synovial fluid analysis in the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection with simple and inexpensive biomarkers

Aims

The aims of this study were to increase the diagnostic accuracy of the analysis of synovial fluid in the differentiation of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) by the addition of inexpensive biomarkers such as the levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), adenosine deaminase (ADA), alpha-2-macrogloblulin (α2M) and procalcitonin.

Patients and Methods

Between January 2013 and December 2015, synovial fluid and removed implants were requested from 143 revision total joint arthroplasties. A total of 55 patients met inclusion criteria of the receipt of sufficient synovial fluid, tissue samples and removed implants for analysis. The diagnosis of PJI followed the definition from a recent International Consensus Meeting to create two groups of patients; septic and aseptic. Using receiver operating characteristic curves we determined the cutoff values and diagnostic accuracy for each marker.

Results

There were 23 PJIs and 32 patients with aseptic loosening. The levels of total leucocyte count, proportion of polymorphonuclear leucocytes (PMNs), CRP, ADA and α2M in the synovial fluid were all significantly higher in those with a PJI than in those with aseptic loosening. The levels of procalcitonin were comparable in the two groups. Cutoff values for the optimal performance in the diagnosis of infection were: total leucocyte count > 1463 cells/μL (sensitivity (Sens) 100%, specificity (Spec) 71.9%, positive predictive value (PPV) 71.9%, negative predictive value (NPV) 100%); proportion of PMNs > 81% (Sens 78.3%, Spec 75.0%, PPV 69.2%, NPV 82.8%); CRP > 6.7mg/L (Sens 78.3%, Spec 93.8%, PPV 90.0%, NPV 85.7%); ADA > 61U/L (Sens 78.3%, Spec 96.9%, PPV 94.7%, NPV 86.1%) and α2M > 958 mg/L (Sens 47.8%, Spec 96.9%, PPV 91.7%, NPV 72.1%). The addition of a raised level of CRP or ADA to the total leukocyte count increased the specificity: total leukocyte count > 1463 cells/μL and CRP > 6.7mg/L (Sens 78.3%, Spec 100%, PPV 100%, NPV 86.5%) or with ADA > 61U/L (Sens 78.3%, Spec 96.9%, PPV 94.7%, NPV 86.1%).

Conclusion

The total leucocyte count in the synovial fluid offers great negative predictive value in the diagnosis of PJI and the addition of more specific markers such as CRP and ADA improves the positive predictive value. Thus the addition of simple and inexpensive markers to the measurement of the leucocyte count in the synovial fluid may reduce the number of equivocal results which demand more expensive investigation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:351–7.

The Fate of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty With Preoperative Abnormalities in Either Sedimentation Rate or C-Reactive Protein

BACKGROUND

Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) are important markers in the evaluation and treatment of painful total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Elevation of both markers usually occurs with infected TKAs while a normal ESR and CRP usually point to aseptic causes for failure. The purpose of this study is to compare (1) rate of revision, (2) infection, and (3) reason for reoperation in a group of patients undergoing revision TKA with a single abnormality in either ESR or CRP in an otherwise negative conventional infection work-up compared to patients with normal preoperative ESR and CRP.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 791 consecutive revision TKAs performed at our institution between years 2004 and 2011. Following exclusion for infection, periprosthetic fracture, prior revision TKA, positive cultures, incomplete records, and patients with less than 24-month follow-up, a total of 228 aseptic revisions (89 knees with 1 abnormal serologic marker) were available for final analysis. No patients met the current established criteria for infection. All knees underwent revision TKA using antibiotic-impregnated cement. The 2 groups were compared in terms of overall survivorship, infection rate, and rate and causes of subsequent aseptic revision.

RESULTS

The average follow-up was 60 months (24-110). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, and Charlson comorbidity index. A preoperative abnormality of either ESR or CRP significantly increased the risk for reoperation for all reasons (odds ratio [OR], 3.2; P = .0028), infection (OR, 4.0; P = .034), and revision for aseptic loosening (OR, 3.69; P = .044). There were no differences in reoperations for any other reason. The average time to revision in the study group was 28.3 months compared to 40.0 months in the control group (P = .213).

CONCLUSION

A single abnormality in either the ESR or CRP increased the likelihood of both infection and reoperation following revision TKA. Conventional methods and criteria for infection detection may not be sufficiently sensitive or specific in these cases. Further work-up with additional modalities may help increase the confidence of aseptic failure before revision TKA.

Single-stage revision for periprosthetic hip infection using antibiotic loaded impaction graft

BACKGROUND

Staged revision for periprosthetic infection of the hip is an accepted and widely used technique by many surgeons. However, single-stage exchange of the hip prosthesis remains an attractive option to others because of the advantages of reduced morbidity, shorter treatment time and hospital stay in addition to the reduced cost of treatment.

HYPOTHESIS

Single-stage revision for periprosthetic hip infection can achieve excellent results if a specific protocol for patients' selection and management is followed.

METHODS

52 patients with evidence of periprosthetic infection had preoperative aspiration of the affected hip. The infecting organisms were identified in 33/52 and single-stage revision was performed. The remaining 19 patients had a 2-stage exchange arthroplasty. Patients in the single-stage revision protocol had antibiotic loaded morsellized bone graft, a cemented cup and a long cementless stem.

RESULTS

At an average follow up of 6 (range 4-8) years postoperatively, only 1 case of persistent infection was found in the single-stage group - a 97% rate of eradicating infection was achieved.

DISCUSSION

Single-stage exchange achieves excellent success rate in patients with periprosthetic infection when a specific protocol for patient selection and management is followed.

Accuracy of diagnostic tests for prosthetic joint infection: a systematic review

PURPOSE

There are few evidence-based recommendations on the most effective methods for diagnosing prosthetic joint infections (PJIs), and the potency of tests in relation to each other also remains vague. This systematic review aimed to (1) identify systematic reviews reporting accuracies of available approaches for diagnosing PJI, (2) critically appraise their quality and bias, and (3) compare the available approaches in terms of accuracy for diagnosing PJI.

METHODS

PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched for meta-analyses reporting accuracies of different diagnostic modalities for PJIs. Thirteen systematic reviews met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and their data were extracted and tabulated by two reviewers in duplicate and independent manners.

RESULTS

The 13 articles reported diagnostic accuracy from 278 clinical studies comprising 27,754 patients and evaluating 13 diagnostic tests grouped into 7 broad categories. Implant sonication had the highest positive likelihood ratio (17.2), followed by bacteriology (15.3) and synovial fluid differentiated cytology (13.3). The highest negative likelihood ratio was for interleukin (IL)-6 serum marker (0.03) followed by synovial fluid cytology and differentiation (0.12 and 0.13, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic tests that are most likely to rule out PJI include serum IL-6, serum C-reactive protein, and synovial fluid cytology. On the other hand, the diagnostic test that is most likely to confirm PJI is implant sonication. Nuclear imaging showed low overall accuracy as diagnostic tests for PJI. The findings of this study could enable clinicians to confirm or rule out PJIs using the most accurate, rapid, least invasive, and cost-effective tools available, thereby enabling fast treatment before formation of resistant biofilms and degradation of patient conditions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic review, Level IV.

Does pre-operative sampling predict intra-operative cultures and antibiotic sensitivities in knee replacements revised for infection?: a study using the NJR dataset

PURPOSE

This study examined a cohort of primary knee arthroplasties revised for peri-prosthetic infection to (1) determine whether the microorganisms isolated by sampling (up to 6 months pre-operatively) are representative of the microorganisms encountered at the time of knee revision, (2) determine whether the antibiotic sensitivity profiles of matching organisms correlate and (3) determine whether the proportion of organism and antibiotic sensitivity matches is influenced by the type of infection, timing of sample collection and the type of microorganism isolated.

METHODS

From the National Joint Registry database for England and Wales, a consecutive series of primary knee arthroplasties performed between 2003 and 2014 that went on to have a revision for peri-prosthetic infection were identified. Each case was then linked to a national microbiology database held by Public Health England. Following data linkage, intra-operative and pre-operative cultures were identified and compared in a group of 75 patients.

RESULTS

Pre-operative genus matched intra-operative genus in 56 of 75 cases (75 %). Of those 56, the corresponding antimicrobial sensitivities matched in 37 (66 % of cases). Overall, 37 of 75 cases (49 %) matched for both microorganism and antimicrobial sensitivity. The proportion of matches was highest in the pure Staphylococcal genus infections (genus match 88 %, sensitivity match 62 %, genus and sensitivity match 55 %) and lowest in those patients with mixed organism infections (genus match 29 %, sensitivity match 14 %).

CONCLUSION

Pre-operative joint sampling obtained by either aspiration or tissue biopsy is advocated in cases where peri-prosthetic infection is suspected and provides the only means of determining infecting organism prior to revision. Overall, only half of all pre-operative cultures matched completely the findings of intra-operative samples in terms of both the microorganism(s) encountered and their corresponding antimicrobial sensitivity profile. Clinicians should be vigilant regarding the possibility of the patient acquiring further microorganisms or the development of new antibiotic resistance by the time of revision, especially in historic pre-operative cultures. Broad spectrum antibiotic therapies should therefore be employed until final microorganisms and antimicrobial sensitivities are confirmed from intra-operative samples.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

EKA survey: diagnosis of prosthetic knee joint infection

PURPOSE

Due to the juvenility of research in the field of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), approaches employed for diagnosis of PJI vary amongst surgeons in different geographic regions. The aim of this study was to determine common diagnostic approaches utilized by European knee arthroplasty surgeons for the diagnosis of PJI.

METHODS

A task force was established for questionnaire development, consisting of surgeons and clinical researchers who each had a record of publishing in the field of PJI. A pool of items was initially generated from a Medline literature search. These were organized into a file and independently sent to each task force member for evaluation and additional supplementation. After reaching a consensus, a final online version was generated and administered to all 4865 members of the "European Society of Sports Traumatology Knee Surgery & Arthroscopy".

RESULTS

There were 262 respondents between August 2015 and March 2016. Most European surgeons (41.1 %) diagnose between 2 and 5 PJIs yearly, and only 5.8 % diagnose >30 PJIs per year. Serum tests to rule out infection were commonly CRP (97.7 %), leucocyte count (73.6 %) and microbiology cultures (45.3 %), while serum interleukins were least common (<5 %). Synovial fluid exams most commonly included microbiology (97.7 %), leucocyte count (74.8 %), percentage polymorphonuclear cells (65.8 %), synovial fluid CRP (26.4 %) and α-defensin (19.4 %). Conventional radiographs represent the most common radiographic exam (87.6 %) followed by SPECT-CT scans (41.7 %). The majority (93.6 %) take biopsies at the time of surgery, 62.0 % take 1-5 biopsies, and 34.9 % take >5. Most biopsies (98.8 %) are sent for culture exams and 72.5 % for histology, and 36.4 % of surgeons send the implants for sonication.

CONCLUSION

Microbiology and cell count remain the most commonly applied synovial fluid tests in Europe, while α-defensin and leucocyte esterase are currently less common. Serum interleukins have not gained widespread use. Implant sonication, despite evidence of diagnostic effectiveness, was only applied by one-third of survey respondents, highlighting the problematic issues of cost and accessibility of some tools. The results highlight the current state of European diagnostic practice, emphasizing the areas of divergence from state of evidence and demonstrating the need for development of standard diagnostic algorithms.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Cross-sectional survey, Level IV.

Prosthetic Device Infections

The immunocompromised host is a particularly vulnerable population in whom routine and unusual infections can easily and frequently occur. Prosthetic devices are commonly used in these patients and the infections associated with those devices present a number of challenges for both the microbiologist and the clinician. Biofilms play a major role in device-related infections, which may contribute to failed attempts to recover organisms from routine culture methods. Moreover, device-related microorganisms can be difficult to eradicate by antibiotic therapy alone. Changes in clinical practice and advances in laboratory diagnostics have provided significant improvements in the detection and accurate diagnosis of device-related infections. Disruption of the bacterial biofilm plays an essential role in recovering the causative agent in culture. Various culture and nucleic acid amplification techniques are more accurate to guide directed treatment regimens. This chapter reviews the performance characteristics of currently available diagnostic assays and summarizes published guidelines, where available, for addressing suspected infected prosthetic devices.

α-Defensin Accuracy to Diagnose Periprosthetic Joint Infection-Best Available Test?

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to test the accuracy of a single synovial fluid biomarker, α-defensin, in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection in revision total hip and revision total knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

A total of 102 patients comprising 116 revision total hip arthroplasty and revision total knee arthroplasty procedures performed between May 2013 and March 2014 were prospectively evaluated. Cases were categorized as infected or notinfected using Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria. Synovial fluid was obtained and tested for α-defensin using a commercially available kit (Synovasure [CD Diagnostics, Baltimore, Maryland]).

RESULTS

For first-stage and single-stage revisions, the α-defensin test had a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval [CI], 86%-100%) and a specificity of 98% (95% CI, 90%-100%) with a positive predictive value of 96% (95% CI, 80%-99%) and negative predictive value of 100% (95% CI, 93%-100%).

CONCLUSION

A positive α-defensin test result was significantly more sensitive and specific for predicting infection than current diagnostic testing and should be considered when managing periprosthetic joint infection.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, Study of Diagnostic Test.

Limitations of Gram staining for the diagnosis of infections following total hip or knee arthroplasty

The diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total joint arthroplasty is difficult for clinicians to make decisions due to the similar symptoms presented by aseptic loosening and infection. Gram staining (GS) is a widely used test but its value remains controversial due to conflicting results in the diagnosis of PJI. The aim of the present study was therefore to evaluate the value of GS in the diagnosis of PJI. Searches using MEDLINE, EMBASE and OVID databases were conducted for data published between January 1990 and December 2013. Meta-analysis was used to pool the sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odd ratios (DORs), area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC), positive-likelihood ratios (PLRs), negative-likelihood ratios (NLRs) and post-test probability. The heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed, and subgroup and meta-regression analyses were conducted. A total of 18 studies, including a total of 4,647 patients, were selected for analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity values for the diagnosis of PJI were 0.19 and 1.00, respectively. The AUC, PLR and NLR were 0.89, 41.6 and 0.82, respectively. Subgroup analyses indicated that the sensitivity/specificity for total hip arthroplasty was 0.14/0.99, whereas that for total knee arthroplasty was 0.14/1.00. Synovial fluid best reflected accurate GS-based diagnoses, with the highest DOR of 242, whereas tissue had the highest AUC of 0.96 (95% CI, 0.94-0.97). GS had a poor clinically acceptable diagnostic value for detecting PJI. These data do not support the routine use of GS, without additional proof of infection, for diagnosing PJI; instead, GS could be used as an adjuvant tool to support the results of other investigations.

Suture-related pseudoinfection after total hip arthroplasty

Absorbable sutures are widely used for wound closure after total hip replacement. Here we present two cases of suture-related foreign-body reaction that perfectly mimicked a periprosthetic joint infection, with sterile abscess formation and physical and laboratory signs of inflammation acutely presenting 7–8 weeks after surgery, at the time of suture absorption. Both recurred with analogous timing after irrigation and debridement, likely due to re-using the same suture material. Multiple negative microbiological samples and positive histological samples showing a foreign-body reaction are the fundamental steps towards the diagnosis of a suture-related pseudoinfection (SRPI). Only three other cases have been reported to date, but the recurrence, together with the self-healing course after relapse, represents a completely novel feature and possibly the strongest demonstration of the supposed aetiopathogenesis. The knowledge of this possible complication leads to some clinical implications: all potential periprosthetic joint infections should routinely undergo not only microbiological but also histological sampling; caution should be used when recommending prosthesis exchange for potential infections occurring in the time range of suture absorption; lastly, if SRPI is suspected, a suture with low propensity to induce foreign-body reactions should be chosen after irrigation and debridement and the volume of absorbable material left in the wound should be as small as possible.

Prosthetic joint infection

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a tremendous burden for individual patients as well as the global health care industry. While a small minority of joint arthroplasties will become infected, appropriate recognition and management are critical to preserve or restore adequate function and prevent excess morbidity. In this review, we describe the reported risk factors for and clinical manifestations of PJI. We discuss the pathogenesis of PJI and the numerous microorganisms that can cause this devastating infection. The recently proposed consensus definitions of PJI and approaches to accurate diagnosis are reviewed in detail. An overview of the treatment and prevention of this challenging condition is provided.

Meta-analysis of sonication fluid samples from prosthetic components for diagnosis of infection after total joint arthroplasty

This meta-analysis included 12 studies that evaluated sonication fluid cultures (SFC) for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI). The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74 to 0.84) and 0.95 (CI, 0.90 to 0.98), respectively. Subgroup analyses showed that a 14-day anaerobic culture may improve sensitivity, the use of centrifugation or vortexing may improve specificity, and the use of 400 to 500 ml of Ringer's solution for containers may improve sensitivity and specificity. The best SFC cutoff was ≥5 CFU. In conclusion, SFC has high sensitivity and very high specificity for diagnosing PJI.

Evaluation of white cell count and differential in synovial fluid for diagnosing infections after total hip or knee arthroplasty

Background

The accuracy of synovial fluid (SF) white cell count (WCC) and polymorphonuclear (PMN) cell evaluation for predicting prosthetic joint infection (PJI) at the total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) site is unknown. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to summarize the diagnostic validity of SF-WCC and SF-PMN for diagnosing PJI.

Methods

The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and OVID databases were searched for studies that had evaluated the diagnostic validity of SF-WCC and SF-PMN between January 1990 and May 2013. Meta-analysis methods were used to pool sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odd ratios (DORs), the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC), positive likelihood ratios (PLR), negative likelihood ratios (NLR), and post-test probability. We also conducted heterogeneity, publication bias, subgroup, and meta-regression analyses.

Results

Fifteen articles (15 SF-WCC and 14 SF-PMN) that included a total of 2787 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were considered for analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for PJI detection was 0.88 (95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.81–0.93) and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.88–0.96) for SF-WCC and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.84–0.93) and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.83–0.92) for SF-PMN, respectively. The AUC was 0.96 for SF-WCC and 0.95 for SF-PMN. PLR and NLR were 13.3 and 0.13 for SF-WCC, and 7.6 and 0.12 for SF-PMN, respectively. There was no evidence of publication bias. Low-clinical-scenario (pre-test probability, 20%) post-test probabilities were 3% for both negative SF-WCC and SF-PMN results. The subgroup analyses indicated that the sensitivity/specificity of THA were 0.73/0.96 for SF-WCC and 0.85/0.83 for SF-PMN, whereas those of TKA were 0.90/0.91 for SF-WCC and 0.90/0.88 for SF-PMN. We also found that collection of SF-WCC preoperatively had a higher sensitivity than that obtained intraoperatively (0.91 vs. 0.77).

Conclusions

SF-WCC and SF-PMN have an adequate and clinically acceptable diagnostic value for detecting PJI, particularly after TKA.