DDD pacing in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a multicentre clinical experience

Pacing in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Dual chamber pacing has been proposed as an alternative to surgery in the management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Reports have documented hemodynamic and symptomatic benefit from dual chamber pacing, raising the question of whether or not all patients with drug-refractory symptoms should undergo a trial of pacing before consideration of surgery. The enthusiasm for pacing in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy has generated a number of investigations addressing this issue, including several recently concluded clinical trials. This article reviews the recent experience with dual chamber pacing in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Ventricular pacing with premature excitation for treatment of hypertensive-cardiac hypertrophy with cavity-obliteration

BACKGROUND

Hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy with supranormal systolic ejection and distal cavity obliteration (HHCO) can result in debilitating exertional fatigue and dyspnea. Dual-chamber pacing with ventricular preactivation generates discoordinate contraction, which can limit cavity obliteration and thereby increase potential ejection reserve. Accordingly, we hypothesized that pacing may improve exercise tolerance long-term in this syndrome.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Dual-chamber pacemakers were implanted in 9 patients with exertional dyspnea caused by HHCO. Intrinsic atrial rate was sensed, and ventricular preactivation was achieved by shortening the atrial-ventricular delay. Pacing was on or off for successive 3-month periods (randomized, double-blind, crossover design), followed by 6 additional pacing-on months. Metabolic exercise testing, quality-of-life assessment, and rest and dobutamine-stress echocardiographic/Doppler data were obtained. After 3 months of pacing-on, exercise duration rose from 324+/-133 to 588+/-238 s (mean+/-SD; P=0.001, with 7 of 9 patients improving >/=30%), and maximal oxygen consumption increased from 13.6+/-2.9 to 16.7+/-3.3 mL of O(2). min(-1). kg(-1) (P<0.02). Both parameters were little changed from baseline during the pacing-off period. Improved exercise capacity persisted at 1-year follow-up. Clinical symptoms and activities of daily living improved during the pacing-on period and stayed improved at 1 year, but they were little changed during the pacing-off period. Despite similar basal values, stroke volume (P<0.001) and cardiac output (P<0.02) increased with dobutamine stimulation 2 to 3 times more after 1 year of follow-up as compared with baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term dual-chamber pacing can improve exercise capacity, cardiac reserve, clinical symptoms, and activities of daily living in patients with HHCO. This therapy may provide a novel alternative for patients in whom traditional pharmacological treatment proves inadequate.

Acute effects of DDD pacing in patients with pulmonary infundibular stenosis

We evaluated acute effects of DDD pacing (right atrium sensed and left ventricle paced) in 3 patients with pulmonary infundibular stenosis and found a decrease in dynamic right ventricular outflow gradient in all of them. It appears that acute temporary DDD pacing may decrease the dynamic obstruction of the right ventricular outflow tract in these patients, probably because of asynchronous contraction of the right ventricle induced by pacing from the left ventricular apex, with contraction of infundibular portion being delayed.

Assessment of permanent dual-chamber pacing as a treatment for drug-refractory symptomatic patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. A randomized, double-blind, crossover study (M-PATHY)

BACKGROUND

Dual-chamber pacing (DDD) has been proposed as a treatment alternative to surgery for severely symptomatic patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), based largely on uncontrolled studies.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This prospective, multicenter trial assessed pacing in 48 symptomatic HCM patients with >/=50 mm Hg basal gradient, refractory to drug therapy. Patients were randomized to 3 months each of DDD pacing and pacing backup (AAI-30) in a double-blind, crossover study design, followed by an uncontrolled and unblinded 6-month pacing trial. With randomization, no significant differences were evident between pacing and no pacing for subjective or objective measures of symptoms or exercise capacity, including NYHA functional class, quality of life score, treadmill exercise time or peak oxygen consumption. After 6 additional months of unblinded pacing, functional class and quality of life score were improved compared with baseline (P<0.01), but peak oxygen consumption was unchanged. Outflow gradient decreased 40%, 82+/-32 mm Hg to 48+/-32 mm Hg (P<0. 001), and was reduced in 57% of patients but showed no change or an increase in 43%. At 12 months, 6 individual patients (12%) showed improved functional capacity; each was 65 to 75 years of age. Left ventricular wall thicknesses in the overall study group showed no remodeling between baseline (22+/-5 mm) and 12 months (21+/-5 mm; P=NS).

CONCLUSIONS

(1) Pacing cannot be regarded as a primary treatment for obstructive HCM; (2) with randomization, perceived symptomatic improvement was most consistent with a substantial placebo effect; (3) longer, uncontrolled pacing periods were associated with some subjective benefit but unaccompanied by objective improvement in cardiovascular performance and should be interpreted cautiously; (4) modest reduction in outflow gradient was achieved in most patients; and (5) a small subset (12%) >/= 65 years of age showed a clinical response, suggesting that DDD pacing could be a therapeutic option for some elderly patients.

Placebo effect of pacemaker implantation in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. PIC Study Group. Pacing In Cardiomyopathy

This study evaluated a possible placebo effect by pacemaker implantation. The study design was a 3-month multicenter, double-blind, randomized cross-over study to compare the effects of atrioventricular (AV) synchronous pacing with an optimal AV delay to inactive pacing in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HC). Quality of life and left ventricular (LV) outflow tract obstruction were evaluated after the first study period in 40 patients assigned to inactive pacing. Data were compared with the corresponding results among the 41 subjects assigned to a first study period of active pacing. During inactive pacing, there was a significant improvement in perceived chest pain, dyspnea, and palpitations. Moreover, LV outflow tract gradient decreased from 71 +/- 32 mm Hg to 52 +/- 34 mm Hg (p = 0.04). In patients assigned to active pacing the reduction of the gradient was significantly more pronounced (70 +/- 24 mm Hg to 33 +/- 27 mm Hg; p <0.0001). The difference in gradient reduction between the groups was highly significant (p <0.00001). In the group assigned to active pacing there was also significant improvement in perceived symptoms as well as in alertness, the ability to be self-autonomous, and strenuous physical exercise. The improvements in the latter were significantly greater in those paced actively compared with patients paced inactively, whereas the changes in perceived symptoms did not differ between groups. In conclusion, pacemaker implantation had a placebo effect on objective and subjective parameters in this group of patients with obstructive HC.

Rapid return of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction and symptoms following cessation of long-term atrioventricular synchronous pacing for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Atrioventricular (AV) synchronous pacing reduces left ventricular (LV) outflow tract obstruction and symptoms in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HC). The duration of gradient reduction, if pacing is discontinued for a prolonged period of time, is unknown. This question is addressed in the present randomized double-blind crossover study comparing continued with inactivated pacing. Ten patients, successfully paced for > or = 6 months, were randomized to continue pacing or to have their pacemakers inactivated after baseline examinations, including echo-Doppler imaging, exercise testing, and a quality-of-life questionnaire. When entering the study, the patients were in New York Heart Association functional classes I to II. After pacemaker programming, examinations were repeated at 1, 4, and 12 weeks. At the 12-week follow-up the alternate pacing mode was programmed, and the patient entered the second study arm. Premature pacemaker pacing occurred if severe clinical deterioration or a significant increase of the LV outflow tract obstruction were evident. Three patients started in the inactive mode and 7 patients in the active mode. All patients who started with the pacemaker inactivated required early reprogramming due to return of symptoms after 7, 10, and 13 days, respectively. All 7 patients who started in the active pacing mode completed the first period; however, after reprogramming to the inactive mode they required early activation after 1 to 20 days due to reappearance of intolerable subjective symptoms. The LV outflow tract gradient increased significantly after inactivation of pacing in all patients (22 +/- 21 mm Hg to 47 +/- 21 mm Hg). Thus, AV synchronous pacing effectively relieves symptoms and reduces the LV outflow tract gradient in patients with obstructive HC. This improvement, which is rapidly established with the initiation of cardiac pacing, is not persistent after cessation of pacing. Reinitialization of pacing promptly reduces the LV outflow tract obstruction and relieves symptoms to a preexisting extent.

Symptomatic hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: the role of dual-chamber pacing

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The management of symptomatic patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) has traditionally consisted of beta blockers and calcium channel blockers. Surgical treatment has been employed for operable patients who became refractory to medical therapy. However, associated complications, mortality rate, and recurrence of functional limitations have shifted the focus toward alternative therapy modalities. Recently, permanent dual-chamber (DDD) pacemaker has been introduced as an alternative treatment option.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study comprises clinical, angiographic, echocardiographic, and electrophysiologic data obtained at a single center on 10 symptomatic patients with HOCM who received a DDD pacemaker after medical therapy failed to relieve symptoms. Presenting symptoms were exertional dyspnea and chest pain (60%), syncope (20%), and presyncope (20%). These symptoms were documented for 8.9+/-7.1 years before pacemaker implantation. All patients were in New York Heart Association functional class III or IV before pacemaker therapy.

RESULTS

Placement of a permanent DDD pacemaker decreased the left ventricular outflow tract gradient from 83+/-44 mm Hg (range: 35-180 mm Hg) to 47.1+/-25.3 mm Hg (range: 10-75 mm Hg) in these patients. Within 1 to 30 months, follow-up found that the functional status of eight out of the 10 patients had improved to New York Heart Association class 0 or I.

CONCLUSION

In selected patients with symptomatic HOCM who fail to respond to medical therapy, DDD pacemaker may offer a nonsurgical alternative treatment option. Large-scale multicenter, prospective, randomized trials are needed to establish the role of this modality in the treatment of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.

[Mitral valve replacement for three cases of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy--surgical treatment]

Three patients with obstructive cardiomyopathy underwent surgical treatment. Mitral valve replacement was performed in all three cases and myectomy of hypertrophic septal muscle was performed in one case. The pressure gradients between the left ventricle and the aorta was less than 10 mmHg in all cases after surgery, Clinical symptoms strikingly improved in three cases. An accurate surgical treatment could be achieved by choosing either myotomy-myectomy, mitral valve replacement or both in the setting of individual condition of each patients.

Mechanism of acute mechanical benefit from VDD pacing in hypertrophied heart: similarity of responses in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and hypertensive heart disease

BACKGROUND

Dual-chamber pacing can improve symptoms in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), but the mechanism remains unclear. We hypothesized that pacing generates discoordinate contraction and a rightward shift of the end-systolic pressure-volume relation (ESPVR) and that benefits from this mechanism do not depend on the presence of resting outflow pressure gradients or obstruction.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Eleven patients with NYHA class III symptoms, 5 with HCM, and 6 with hypertensive hypertrophy and cavity obliteration, were studied by invasive conductance catheter methods. No patient had coronary artery or primary valvular disease. Pressure-volume relations were recorded before and during VDD pacing by use of a short (75-millisecond) PR interval to achieve preexcitation. Left ventricular cavity pressure was simultaneously recorded at basal and apical sites, with pressure at the basal site used to generate the ESPVRs. VDD pacing shifted the ESPVR rightward, increasing end-systolic volume by 45% (range, 17% to 151%; P=0.002). Resting and provokable gradients declined by 20% (range, -56% to +3%) and 30% (range, -65% to -12%), respectively (P<0.05). Preload declined by 3% to 10% because of the short PR interval. Preload-corrected contractility indexes and myocardial workload declined by approximately 10% (P<0.001). Diastolic compliance and relaxation time were unchanged. Pacing made apical pressure-volume loops discoordinate, limiting cavity obliteration and reducing distal systolic pressures. Results in both patient groups were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

VDD pacing shifts the ESPVR rightward in HCM patients with cavity obliteration with or without obstruction, increasing end-systolic volumes and reducing apical cavity compression and cardiac work. These effects likely contribute to reduced metabolic demand and improved symptoms.

Mid-Term Results of Dual-Chamber Pacing in Children with Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND: Permanent dual-chambered pacing (DDD) is an alternative to surgical treatment in patients with severe hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) who do not have a satisfactory response to medical treatment. METHODS: Five children with severe HOCM still symptomatic despite medical treatment underwent permanent DDD pacing and were followed for 21 +/- 9.7 months. RESULTS: All patients improved their functional class. Doppler echocardiographic studies showed an early reduction of the left ventricular outflow tract gradient from 66 +/- 40 to 40 +/- 20 mmHg (P < 0.05) and to 30 +/- 11 mmHg (P < 0.05 and NS for comparison with the baseline and the early post-DDD pacing gradients, respectively) at mid-term follow-up. There was no evidence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction, and the results of left ventricular filling studies ruled out deleterious effects on diastolic function. Doppler echocardiography played a key role in the initial and subsequent assessment of these patients. CONCLUSIONS: Permanent DDD pacing is a reasonable alternative to surgery in children with HOCM who are still symptomatic despite medical therapy.

Newer clinical applications of pacing

For many years, the indications for permanent cardiac pacing consisted primarily of AV block and sinus node dysfunction. In recent years, the indications for pacing have expanded considerably. This article details recent advances in the application of permanent pacing and the use of permanent pacing for patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, dilated cardiomyopathy, prevention of atrial fibrillation, and pacing in the long QT syndrome. Pacing is now an accepted therapeutic modality in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and has rapidly gained acceptance in the United States, although there are still many unknowns about selection of patients and long-term benefits. Even less is known about pacing for dilated cardiomyopathy. Certain patients do respond with definite subjective improvement and improved quality of life, although there are no data to date to suggest improved longevity. Pacing for long QT syndrome is now a well-accepted indication for this relatively small subset of patients. Pacing for the prevention of atrial fibrillation is still in the very early stages of development. Multiple methods have been tried with the current method of choice being dual site atrial pacing. However, it is too early to predict the long-term success of this modality.

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: evaluation and treatment of patients at high risk for sudden death

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a heritable disease characterized by LV hypertrophy with markedly variable clinical, morphological, and genetic manifestations. It is the most common cause of sudden death in otherwise healthy young individuals. HCM patients often have disabling symptoms and are prone to arrhythmias. Frequently, there is associated LV systolic and diastolic dysfunction, LV outflow obstruction, and myocardial ischemia. Over the past decade, progress has been made in identifying patients who are at high risk for sudden death, in elucidating potential mechanisms of sudden death, and in defining therapeutic algorithms that may improve prognosis. It has also been possible to determine the genetic defect in some of the patients and to correlate clinical findings with the molecular defects. An exciting development has been the use of dual chamber pacemaker as an alternative to cardiac surgery to improve symptoms and relieve LV outflow obstruction.

Dual-chamber pacing for cardiomyopathies: a 1996 clinical perspective

Implantation of a permanent pacemaker is an accepted mode of therapy for symptomatic bradyarrhythmias. Application of pacemaker technology for the treatment of cardiomyopathies has generated considerable interest and enthusiastic support in recent years. In both hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and dilated cardiomyopathy, dual-chamber pacing has been shown to decrease symptoms and improve hemodynamics; however, not all patients will benefit from dual-chamber pacing. Technical considerations must be acknowledged in order to obtain optimal benefit with dual-chamber pacing. In addition, other more accepted therapies are available for patients with symptomatic cardiomyopathies. The purposes of this article are to review critically the current literature on the use of dual-chamber pacemakers in patients with either hypertrophic or dilated cardiomyopathy and to provide a clinical perspective based on current knowledge.

Effects of permanent dual chamber pacing on myocardial perfusion in symptomatic hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

OBJECTIVE

Angina and the presence of myocardial ischaemia are common in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Dual chamber pacing results in clinical improvement in these patients. This study evaluates the effects of permanent dual chamber pacing on absolute regional myocardial perfusion and perfusion reserve.

SETTING

University hospital.

PATIENTS AND DESIGN

Six patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and severe symptoms of angina received a dual chamber pacemaker. Absolute myocardial regional perfusion and perfusion reserve (dipyridamole 0.56 mg/kg) were measured by dynamic positron emission tomography with 13N-ammonia both during sinus rhythm and 3 months after pacemaker insertion. Results were compared with those from 28 healthy volunteers.

RESULTS

Pacing resulted in a reduction of anginal complaints and a reduction in intraventricular pressure gradient from 65 (SD 30) mm Hg to 19 (10) mm Hg. During sinus rhythm, baseline perfusion was higher in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy than controls (184 (31) v 106 (26) ml/min/100 g, P < 0.01), and perfusion reserve was lower (1.6 (0.4) v 2.8 (1.0), P < 0.05). During pacing myocardial perfusion decreased to 130 (27) ml/min/100 g (P < 0.05), with variable responses in terms of perfusion reserve. Pacing caused a redistribution of myocardial stress perfusion and perfusion reserve. The coefficient of regional variation of myocardial stress perfusion decreased from 19.7 (7.0)% to 14.6 (3.9)% during pacing (12.9 (3.8)% in controls, P < 0.01). The coefficient of regional variation of perfusion reserve decreased from 16.7 (6.6)% to 11.4 (2.6)% during pacing (9.8 (4.1)% in controls, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Pacing caused a decrease of resting left ventricular myocardial blood flow and blood flow during pharmacologically induced coronary vasodilatation. Although global perfusion reserve remained unchanged, myocardial perfusion reserve became more homogeneously distributed.