Molecular karyotyping in patients with mental retardation using 100K single-nucleotide polymorphism arrays

Fluorescence in situ hybridization techniques in medical diagnostics

BACKGROUND

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has become a well-established method in medical diagnostics. FISH methods complement conventional cytogenetic banding techniques and offer extra clinical applications. FISH is based on the binding of complementary, single-stranded fluorescence-labeled nucleic acid sequences to the fixed and denatured target DNA of metaphases, interphase nuclei or isolated DNA sequences (BACs, oligonucleotides).

OBJECTIVE

The intent of this article is to review the development of molecular cytogenetic techniques available at present and to summarize the most efficient and appropriate use of these techniques in medical diagnostics. The technical aspects and most important applications of FISH assays are described.

CONCLUSION

FISH is bridging the gap between conventional cytogenetic banding analysis and molecular genetic DNA studies. The use of FISH techniques enhances the correct interpretation of numerical and structural chromosome aberrations.

A novel 6.14 Mb duplication of chromosome 8p21 in a patient with autism and self mutilation

Autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) are a group of neurodevelopmental disorders with a strong genetic etiology. Cytogenetic abnormalities have been detected in 5-10% of the patients with autism. In this study, we present the clinical, cytogenetic and array-comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) evaluation of a 13-year-old male with severe developmental delay, facial dysmorphic features, autism and self mutilation. The patient was found to carry a de novo duplication of chromosome region 8p21 of minimally 6.14 and maximally 6.58 Mb as ascertained by bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC)-based array-CGH. Hitherto, only a few patients with autism with cytogenetically visible duplications involving the chromosome 8p21 region have been described, but the extent of these duplications has not been determined at the molecular level. This represents the smallest rearrangement of chromosomal region 8p21 as yet found in a patient with autism. For 11 of the 36 genes with known functions located within this duplication clear transcription in the brain was found. Of those the STMN4 and DPYSL2 genes are the most likely candidate genes to be involved in neuronal development, and, if altered in gene-dosage, in the autistic phenotype of our patient.

Clinical and molecular delineation of the 17q21.31 microdeletion syndrome

BACKGROUND

The chromosome 17q21.31 microdeletion syndrome is a novel genomic disorder that has originally been identified using high resolution genome analyses in patients with unexplained mental retardation.

AIM

We report the molecular and/or clinical characterisation of 22 individuals with the 17q21.31 microdeletion syndrome.

RESULTS

We estimate the prevalence of the syndrome to be 1 in 16,000 and show that it is highly underdiagnosed. Extensive clinical examination reveals that developmental delay, hypotonia, facial dysmorphisms including a long face, a tubular or pear-shaped nose and a bulbous nasal tip, and a friendly/amiable behaviour are the most characteristic features. Other clinically important features include epilepsy, heart defects and kidney/urologic anomalies. Using high resolution oligonucleotide arrays we narrow the 17q21.31 critical region to a 424 kb genomic segment (chr17: 41046729-41470954, hg17) encompassing at least six genes, among which is the gene encoding microtubule associated protein tau (MAPT). Mutation screening of MAPT in 122 individuals with a phenotype suggestive of 17q21.31 deletion carriers, but who do not carry the recurrent deletion, failed to identify any disease associated variants. In five deletion carriers we identify a <500 bp rearrangement hotspot at the proximal breakpoint contained within an L2 LINE motif and show that in every case examined the parent originating the deletion carries a common 900 kb 17q21.31 inversion polymorphism, indicating that this inversion is a necessary factor for deletion to occur (p<10(-5)).

CONCLUSION

Our data establish the 17q21.31 microdeletion syndrome as a clinically and molecularly well recognisable genomic disorder.

Clinical phenotype of germline RUNX1 haploinsufficiency: from point mutations to large genomic deletions

Germline RUNX1 mutations result in a rare autosomal dominant condition characterized by qualitative and quantitative platelet defects and predisposition to the development of myeloid malignancies (familial platelet disorder with propensity to acute myeloid leukaemia, FPD/AML). Only 13 pedigrees have previously been described so far. We report on two novel germline RUNX1 mutations: (1) an out-of-frame 8 bp heterozygous deletion (c.442_449del) in an FPD/AML pedigree and (2) a de novo 3.5 Mb deletion in the 21q22.11.21q22.12 region encompassing the RUNX1 gene in a mentally retarded female patient with short stature and thrombocytopenia. Interestingly, a similar de novo submicroscopic deletion has been recently reported in the literature in a mentally retarded patient. Mental retardation is one of the most common disorders and primary causes of thrombocytopenia are rare. When occurring together, these features should prompt to test for 21q22 deletion for comprehensive genetic counselling and clinical management.

Genetic evaluation of intellectual disabilities

All children with an intellectual disability (mental retardation) or global developmental delay should have a comprehensive evaluation to establish the etiology of the disability. A specific etiologic diagnosis offers the opportunity to discuss treatment, prognosis, and genetic recurrence risk. A diagnosis also avoids unnecessary testing and can lead to opportunities for improved health and functional outcomes. The key elements of the diagnostic evaluation are the medical and developmental history, 3-generation family history, dysmorphologic examination, neurologic examination, and judicious use of the laboratory and neuroimaging. All published guidelines for the evaluation of children with intellectual disability acknowledge that there is a substantial percentage of patients who are undiagnosed after a comprehensive evaluation and who deserve ongoing follow-up for the purpose of establishing a diagnosis. Recently, studies of the clinical application of array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) to individuals with intellectual disability indicate that this approach provides a diagnosis in as much as 10% of patients and that this technique is replacing the use of fluorescent in situ hybridization for subtelomere imbalances now used for such patients when the standard karyotype is normal. The literature suggests that history and examination by an expert clinician will lead to a diagnosis in 2 of 3 patients in whom a diagnosis is made. Laboratory studies alone, including neuroimaging, provide a diagnosis in the remaining one third. The approach to the evaluation of the patient in whom an etiologic diagnosis is not suspected after the history and physical examinations includes a standard karyotype, Fragile X molecular genetic testing, aCGH, and neuroimaging, based on the evidence to date. One can expect rapid changes in the microarray technology in the near future.