Intense immunosuppression in chronic progressive multiple sclerosis: the Kaiser study

Cyclophosphamide in chronic progressive multiple sclerosis: a comparative study

No effective treatment is presently available for progressive multiple sclerosis (MS). Cyclophosphamide (CFX), a cytotoxic immunosuppressive drug widely used in systemic dysimmune diseases, has been proposed for the treatment of multiple sclerosis with different schedules and controversial results. To evaluate the safety and clinical efficacy of CFX, we compared three different treatment schedules in patients with progressive MS: induction followed by bimonthly boosters for one year (17 patients); bimonthly boosters for one year without previous induction (15 patients); and monthly boosters for one year (21 patients). Survival analysis showed that the percentage of stable patients was significantly higher in the first and third treatment schedule groups. Myelotoxicity occurred in patients treated with induction and boosters (Group A). A high incidence of broncopneumonia was observed in patients undergoing the second treatment schedule (Group B). No major effects were observed in patients treated with monthly boosters (Group C). Response to treatment was limited to secondary progressive form. This study suggests that monthly treatment with CFX might be safely administered in progressive MS patients; its clinical efficacy must be confirmed by an appropriately designed clinical trial.

Rational clinical immunotherapy for multiple sclerosis

In this article, we assess the roles and the efficacy of immunopharmacologic agents in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) and other demyelinating disease syndromes. The initial clinical manifestations of demyelinating disease, immunotherapeutic goals, efficacy of individual agents, and specific immunopharmacologic recommendations are discussed. MS and other idiopathic demyelinating disease syndromes can be effectively managed with immunotherapy. Exacerbations are treatable, and the frequency and severity of exacerbations can be reduced. Although some agents have a minor effect on progression of disability, current approaches have not proved to have a major influence on treatment of progressive MS. Immunotherapy for inflammatory demyelinating disease necessitates a high degree of clinical certainty about the diagnosis. Because all available therapeutic agents have limitations and significant toxic effects, careful consideration is necessary before use. Treatment should be individualized on the basis of the clinical course of the disease and the degree of patient disability.

Investigational drug therapies of treatment of multiple sclerosis

The licensing of interferon beta-1b dramatically changed the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) in the United States. Although it was the first therapeutic agent shown to affect the natural course of the disease, interferon beta-1b is not appropriate for all patients and is far from being a cure. Several other promising therapies now under study include immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory drugs to limit inflammation; oral administration of myelin to induce tolerance; monoclonal antibodies designed to deliver targeted immunotherapy; potassium channel blockers to facilitate conduction along demyelinated axons; and glial growth factors to promote remyelination. Clinical trials of potential therapeutic agents have proliferated in the past decade in conjunction with rapid advances in our understanding of the immunologic basis of MS. Some investigational therapies are associated with problematic toxicities, others benefit only a minority of patients, and many are still in the early stages of development. Nevertheless, because current therapeutic options are limited, and because the history of MS therapy is one of disappointment and frustration, it is essential that legitimate, scientifically based advances be widely disseminated to the neurologic community. This article reviews some of the most promising current and investigational therapies for MS.

Does a placebo-effect exist in clinical trials on multiple sclerosis? Review of the literature

To verify whether the outcome in placebo-treated MS patients actually corresponds to that expected on the basis of the natural history and pretrial evolution of the disease, we here review the results of clinical trials conducted according to a placebo-controlled, randomized design, regardless of the experimental therapy used. The frequency of relapse in remitting-relapsing patients decreases during follow-up, and disability in progressive cases increases more slowly than before enrollment. These data should be borne in mind when evaluating the impact of experimental drugs on the natural course of the disease.

Multiple sclerosis therapy. A practical guide

A growing amount of evidence suggests that a disturbance of immunological function is of importance in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. This is reflected in the drugs used to slow progression and to treat relapses. Immunosuppressive drugs such as azathioprine, cyclophosphamide and cyclosporin might have some potential to slow down progression of multiple sclerosis, but their use is limited by potentially serious adverse effects. Recently, it was shown that interferon-beta-1b can diminish the exacerbation rate in multiple sclerosis without leading to unacceptable adverse effects. Nevertheless, symptomatic treatment remains of crucial importance in the management of multiple sclerosis patients. Spasticity, depression, fatigue and urinary, paroxysmal and sensory symptoms can all be alleviated to some extent with pharmacological interventions, although rehabilitation procedures and psychosocial consultations are no less important. Further therapeutic approaches to multiple sclerosis will be directed at either the specificity of the immune response or the grade of activation of the immune response. Magnetic resonance imaging techniques will play an important role in the evaluation of efficacy of new therapeutic agents.

Low-dose (7.5 mg) oral methotrexate reduces the rate of progression in chronic progressive multiple sclerosis

A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, clinical trial of low-dose, weekly, oral methotrexate was performed in 60 patients with clinically definite chronic progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) attending a referral-based outpatient MS clinic. Study patients were 21 to 60 years old with a disease duration of longer than 1 year. Patients' Expanded Disability Status Scale scores were 3.0 to 6.5 (ambulatory with moderate disability). Patients were first stratified by Expanded Disability Status Scale scores, 3.0 to 5.5 and 6.0 to 6.5, and then were randomized to receive methotrexate or placebo treatment. Treatment consisted of weekly, oral, low-dose (7.5 mg) methotrexate or identical placebo for 2 years, followed by observation for as long as 1 year. A composite outcome measurement instrument was used and consisted of (1) Expanded Disability Status Scale, (2) ambulation index, (3) Box and Block Test, and (4) 9-Hole Peg Test. Failure of therapy was indicated by a designated change that was sustained for more than 2 months in one or more components of this composite measure. Significantly less progression of impairment as measured by validated tests of upper-extremity function was observed in the methotrexate treatment group in the absence of clinically significant toxicity. We conclude that low-dose, weekly, oral methotrexate offers a new, relatively nontoxic treatment option for patients with chronic progressive MS.

Role of steroids and immunosuppression and effects of interferon beta-1b in multiple sclerosis

Corticosteroids, corticotropin, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, and IFN-beta 1b have each had a substantial effect on the care of patients with multiple sclerosis and the design of subsequent clinical trials of experimental therapeutics for MS. The use of MRI scanning and more sensitive clinical outcome measures will possibly enable us to complete clinical trials in a fraction of the time required for earlier trials. The release of Betaseron, which favorably alters the attack rate in ambulatory patients with relapsing-remitting MS has brought a sense of renewed optimism to patients with MS, their families, and their care providers. New promising therapies for chronic progressive MS and biologic products possibly capable of enhancing the effects of IFN-beta 1b in patients with relapsing MS are setting the stage for additional important therapeutic advances in this disease.

The dynamics of multiple sclerosis. The Charcot Lecture

The history of our understanding of the pathogenesis and pathophysiology of multiple sclerosis are reviewed in the context of Charcot's contribution. The implications for treatment of the new knowledge gained from studies during life of pathology and pathogenesis (by MRI) and pathophysiology (by evoked potentials) are reviewed.