Autonomic effects of selegiline: possible cardiovascular toxicity in Parkinson's disease

Treatment of motor dysfunction in Parkinson's disease: an overview

Levodopa remains the most effective treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the use of this drug is complicated by several adverse effects, in particular motor fluctuations and dyskinesias. Drugs providing more continuous dopaminergic stimulation and surgical approaches, such as deep-brain stimulation, have an important ameliorative effect on these problems. Despite these advances, the progression of the disease remains unaffected and strategies that slow or stop the neurodegenerative process are currently not available. Nevertheless, several compounds or surgical procedures are candidates for being neuroprotective and some of them are under evaluation.

The effects of acute loading with levodopa and levodopa with selegiline on blood pressure and plasma norepinephrine levels in chronic Parkinson's disease patients

OBJECTIVES

Contradictory possible cardiovascular side effects of selegiline have been reported. Therefore, we studied the effect of acute administration of selegiline with levodopa (LD) compared with LD alone, on blood pressure, pulse and norepinephrine (NE) plasma levels, during an orthostatic test on chronically treated Parkinson's disease patients (PDpts) and controls.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twelve PDpts treated with LD (group D), 12 PDpts treated with selegiline and LD (group S) and eight volunteers (CTRL) underwent the orthostatic test. Patients repeated the test twice, before and after acute loading with 125 mg LD (group D) and 125 mg LD +5 mg selegiline (group S).

RESULTS

Group S showed more episodes of postural hypotension (n = 10; two symptomatic) than group D (n = 4) and CTRL (n = 2), however not statistically significant. Plasma NE also rose significantly higher (P < 0.001) in group S.

CONCLUSION

PD patients treated with selegiline showed more orthostatism and higher plasma NE after submission to the orthostatic test. These findings may be relevant to explain its deleterious effect.

Alternatives to Levodopa in the Initial??Treatment of Early Parkinson???s Disease

Parkinson's disease (PD) is primarily a disease of elderly patients. This article reviews current knowledge and recent developments relating to drugs that can be used as alternatives to levodopa as initial treatment of PD. Synthetic orally acting dopamine agonists have found increasing favour as an option for early PD in relatively young patients. This strategy is based on evidence that this approach may delay the onset of motor fluctuations, at least during the first 5 years of treatment. Subcutaneous apomorphine infusions may attenuate motor fluctuations in late-stage disease, and transdermal rotigotine, a dopamine agonist in development, has also been shown to be efficacious. The greater proclivity for dopamine agonists to cause psychotoxicity has, however, limited their routine use in the elderly. Selective monoamine oxidase type B (MAO-B) inhibitors, used as monotherapy, delay the need for the introduction of levodopa by about 9 months. These agents appear to be less efficacious than dopamine agonists but are better tolerated. Concern has been expressed about the potential of the MAO-B inhibitor selegiline (deprenyl) to induce cardiovascular adverse effects (orthostatic hypotension), either directly or through its amphetamine catabolites. Rasagiline is a new MAO-B inhibitor that is not broken down to amphetamine derivatives and is indicated as both monotherapy in early PD and as adjunctive therapy in PD patients with motor fluctuations. Two older classes of agents have undergone a resurgence of interest in recent years. Amantadine, which enhances dopaminergic transmission and has antiglutamate activity, is occasionally used as monotherapy but has recently been widely used as an antidyskinetic agent in late-stage PD. Anticholinergic drugs, such as benztropine (benzatropine) and orphenadrine also provide control of symptoms when used as monotherapy, but their psychotoxic, cognitive and autonomic adverse events make them inappropriate for the treatment of the elderly. Effective therapy in PD should prevent disease progression and abolish motor and cognitive handicap. Currently, none of the existing drugs meets all these needs.

Double-blind, randomized, controlled trial of rasagiline as monotherapy in early Parkinson's disease patients

Rasagiline (N-propargyl-1(R)-aminoindan) mesylate is a potent, selective, and irreversible monoamine oxidase-B inhibitor. This study was designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of rasagiline monotherapy in early Parkinson's disease (PD) patients not receiving levodopa. The study was performed as a multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 10-week study. Fifty-six PD patients were randomly assigned to rasagiline mesylate 1, 2, or 4 mg once daily, or placebo. A 3-week dose-escalation period was followed by a 7-week maintenance phase. At week 10, the mean (+/-SE) changes from baseline in total Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) score were -1.8 (+/-1.3), -3.6 (+/-1.7), -3.6 (+/-1.2), and -0.5 (+/-0.8) in the rasagiline 1, 2, and 4 mg/day and placebo groups, respectively. Analysis of responders showed that 28% of patients (12 of 43) receiving rasagiline had an improvement in total UPDRS score of greater than 30%, compared with none of the patients receiving placebo (P < 0.05, Fisher's exact test). The frequency and types of adverse events reported by rasagiline-treated and placebo-treated patients were similar. These results suggest that rasagiline monotherapy is well tolerated and efficacious in early PD.

Tolerability, Safety, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacokinetics of Rasagiline: A Potent, Selective, and Irreversible Monoamine Oxidase Type B Inhibitor

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To investigate the tolerability, safety, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of rasagiline after once-daily oral administration of single or repeated doses.

DESIGN

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-way, single-dose study and a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, repeated-dose study.

SETTING

Clinical research center in France.

SUBJECTS

Healthy male volunteers aged 18-40 years (12 in the single-dose study, 24 in the repeated-dose study).

INTERVENTION

In the single-dose study, subjects received, in a randomized sequence, single doses of placebo, rasagiline 1 mg, and rasagiline 5 mg; or placebo, rasagiline 2 mg, and rasagiline 10 mg. Six subjects received an additional single dose of rasagiline 20 mg. There was a 2-week washout period between each dose. In the repeated-dose study, subjects were randomized to receive rasagiline 2 mg, 5 mg, or 10 mg, or placebo once/day for 10 days.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

To assess tolerability and safety, patients underwent physical examinations, vital sign measurements, 12-lead electrocardiograms, clinical laboratory testing, and bleeding time studies. To determine platelet monoamine oxidase type B (MAO-B) activity and rasagiline pharmacokinetics, blood and urine samples were taken. In the single-dose study, rasagiline 1-20 mg was well tolerated. Each dose significantly inhibited platelet MAO-B activity. In the repeated-dose study, all doses of rasagiline were well tolerated; almost full inhibition of platelet MAO-B activity was achieved with each rasagiline dose.

CONCLUSION

Rasagiline is well tolerated at doses up to 20 mg once/day and is a potent inhibitor of platelet MAO-B in humans.

Cardiovascular activity of rasagiline, a selective and potent inhibitor of mitochondrial monoamine oxidase B: comparison with selegiline

Selegiline is used for treating Parkinson's disease. Despite its efficacy, the clinical use of selegiline in combination with l-dihydroxphenylalanine in Parkinsonian patients is hampered by cardiovascular complications, such as hypotension. This study was designed to compare in rats the cardiovascular effects of selegiline and rasagiline, their metabolites l-methamphetamine and aminoindan (TVP-136), respectively, and the second rasagiline metabolite non-monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitor TVP-1022 (N-propargyl-1S(-)aminoindan). Intravenous (i.v.) administration of selegiline and rasagiline (1 mg kg(-1)) to anaesthetized rats (thiobutabarbital, 100 mg kg(-1), i.p.) did not affect mean arterial pressure (MAP), carotid blood flow (CBF) or carotid vascular resistance (CVR). Selegiline (10 mg kg(-1), i.v.) decreased MAP, CBF and increased CVR. In contrast, rasagiline (10 mg kg(-1), i.v.) caused a small transient decrease in MAP, while CBF and CVR were unchanged. l-methamphetamine (1 mg kg(-1), i.v.) administration provoked a dramatic and long-lasting depressor response, decreased CBF and increased CVR. In contrast, injection of aminoindan or TVP-1022 at a similar dose produced gradual nonsignificant decreases in MAP and CBF. Chronic oral treatment (21 days) of awake rats with selegiline at 10 mg kg(-1) decreased systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and MAP, whereas heart rate was unaffected. Since the effective MAO-B inhibitory and clinical dose of rasagiline is about one-tenth that of selegiline, administration of 1 mg kg(-1) day(-1) rasagiline resulted in moderate decreases in SBP, DBP, and MAP, which were significantly lower than those caused by the 10 mg kg(-1) day(-1) dose of selegiline. These findings indicate that rasagiline, when given at doses equivalent to selegiline, is less likely to be hypotensive.

Zydis selegiline reduces off time in Parkinson's disease patients with motor fluctuations: a 3-month, randomized, placebo-controlled study

Zydis selegiline dissolves on contact with saliva and undergoes pregastric absorption. This minimizes first-pass metabolism and provides high plasma concentrations of selegiline. In this study, the efficacy and safety of Zydis selegiline was assessed in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients who were experiencing motor fluctuations with levodopa. Patients were randomly assigned to either drug or placebo in a 2:1 ratio in this double-blind, multicenter trial. Significant reductions in daily off time occurred at 4 to 6 weeks with the 1.25 mg dose (9.9%, P = 0.003) and 10 to 12 weeks with the 2.5 mg dose (13.2%, P < 0.001). The total number of off hours was reduced by 2.2 hours at Week 12 from baseline (compared with 0.6 hours in the placebo group). The average number of dyskinesia-free on hours for the Zydis selegiline patients increased by 1.8 hours at Week 12. There was no change in mean percentage of "Asleep" time throughout the study. No apparent differences were detected in the occurrence of drug-related adverse events between the Zydis selegiline group and placebo-treated groups. Adverse events were consistent with known effects of levodopa therapy. Zydis selegiline safely reduces daily off time when used as adjunctive therapy with levodopa in patients with PD.

Differential effects of various treatment combinations on cardiovascular dysfunction in patients with Parkinson's disease

OBJECTIVES

Patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) frequently suffer from cardiovascular dysfunction, which may be enhanced to various extents by different antiparkinsonian drugs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analysed electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities, cardiovascular reflexes (CVR) and orthostatic hypotension (OH) in 148 patients with idiopathic PD assigned to five different combination therapies of levodopa (LD) plus either bromocriptine (BRO), ropinirole (ROP), selegiline (SEL), anticholinergic (ACH) or amantadine (AMA) or to LD monotherapy before and after a 1-week washout of the add-on drug. Patients were matched for age and disease severity (Hoehn and Yahr stage 2-3). Rater-blinded cardiovascular testing was performed at baseline, and following a 1-week washout period of the add-on drugs.

RESULTS

We found that the incidence of cardiovascular dysfunction was generally higher in patients receiving a combination therapy compared with patients on LD monotherapy. ECG abnormalities were found in 40-52% of patients in combination therapy, but in only 20% of the patients receiving LD monotherapy. After discontinuation of BRO and SEL, there were significant improvements in ECG, OH and CVR. After washout of ACH and AMA, a significant improvement was found only in the CVR score. AMA and ROP were the add-on drugs with the least adverse cardiovascular effects.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that pre-existing cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction should be investigated and taken into account when deciding which combination therapy to choose in the treatment of parkinsonian patients.

Neuroprotective Effect of Deprenyl in Sensory Neurons of Axotomized Dorsal Root Ganglion

Spinal motoneuron neuroprotection by deprenyl was previously reported; the present study was carried out to evaluate neuroprotectivity in the dorsal root ganglion sensory neuron. The total neuron counts were calculated, and the axotomized sensory neurons of the dorsal root ganglion were significantly lower than those of the unaxotomized sides. Three secondary and three tertiary parameters were used. The secondary parameters were: the percentages of sensory neuron increase at the axotomized side (PNIA) and at the unaxotomized side (PNIU), and the percentage of neuronal response (PNR). The tertiary parameters were: the percentages of maximal response at the axotomized side (PMRA) and at the unaxotomized side (PMRU), and the percentage of maximal relative response (PMRR). Nonlinear statistical analysis using Gaussian, quadratic and logistic models of the tertiary parameters suggested that the data were bell-shape, which indicated that the data were biphasic. The data were divided into ascending and descending sets, and linear regression. They were analyzed according to Bent-hyperbola model and the ascending set was considered as a neurotrophic phase, while the descending one as a neurotoxic phase. The slops of PMRA were higher than that of PMRU, which indicates that the axotomized neurons were more sensitive than the unaxotomized neurons to the protective and neurotoxic effect of deprenyl. Moreover, the results showed that deprenyl had a proliferative effect on the dorsal root ganglion sensory neuron.

Selegiline in the treatment of Parkinson's disease: its impact on orthostatic hypotension

Less than a consensus exists as to whether chronic treatment with selegiline in combination with levodopa/carbidopa in patients with Parkinson's disease, is associated with more pronounced orthostatic hypotension than treatment with levodopa/carbidopa alone. To resolve this issue, we compared orthostatic tolerance and autonomic reflexes in 95 patients with Parkinson's disease treated chronically with either selegiline alone (n = 10), levodopa/carbidopa alone (n = 49) or both agents combined (n = 36). Supine heart rate and blood pressure, autonomic cardiovascular reflexes and the frequency and magnitude of orthostatic hypotension were similar in all three treatment groups.

Are electrophysiological autonomic tests useful in the assessment of dysautonomia in Parkinson's disease?

To assess the autonomic system in Parkinson's disease (PD), the sympathetic skin response (SSR) and the R-R interval variation (RRIV) tests were studied in 26 PD patients and in 24 healthy controls. The aim of the study was to evaluate the sympathetic and parasympathetic system function in PD, to define the pattern of autonomic abnormalities found in SSR and RRIV in parkinsonian patients as well as to analyze the usefulness of both tests in paraclinical assessment of the dysautonomia, compared with clinical symptoms and signs of the autonomic nervous system involvement. The corrrelations between both autonomic tests results were also studied. In PD patients SSR test was abnormal in about 35% and RRIV was abnormal in about 54% of patients. SSR and RRIV were both abnormal in about 27% of PD patients whereas at least one of electrophysiological autonomic tests was abnormal in about 62% of PD patients. Clinical and paraclinical signs of dysautonomia occurred in a similar proportion of patients (i.e. in about 62%). A weak correlation was found between the latency of SSR from upper limbs and the value of RRIV during deep breathing (p=0.063). Our results show that SSR and RRIV are non-invasive paraclinical electrophysiological tests that confirm clinical dysautonomia in PD and can supplement the clinical differentiation of Parkinsonian syndromes.

Pharmacological properties of the anti-Parkinson drug rasagiline; modification of endogenous brain amines, reserpine reversal, serotonergic and dopaminergic behaviours

Rasagiline [N-propargyl-1R(+)-aminoindan; TVP1012] is a potent irreversible monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitor with selectivity for type B of the enzyme, which is being developed for treatment of Parkinson's disease. In this study we examined effects of rasagiline on CNS monoamine levels, modification of behavioural response to L-tryptophan, fluoxetine and L-DOPA, and reversal of reserpine syndrome. Reserpine-induced ptosis was reversed by rasagiline at doses above 2 mg x kg(-1) i.p., which inhibit MAO-A as well as MAO-B, but not at MAO-B-selective doses. However, combination of rasagiline (10 mg x kg(-1) i.p.) with L-DOPA or L-tryptophan (50 mg x kg(-1) i.p.), or rasagiline (10 mg x kg(-1) p.o.) with fluoxetine (10 mg x kg(-1) p.o.), did not induce the behavioural hyperactivity syndrome which is seen following inhibition of both MAO-A and MAO-B by tranylcypromine together with the monoamine precursors. Following oral administration, levels of noradrenaline (NA), 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) and dopamine (DA) were unaffected in hippocampus and striatum after single doses of rasagiline up to 2 mg x kg(-1). Following chronic oral administration (21 days, one dose daily), levels of NA, 5-HT and DA in hippocampus and striatum were unaffected by rasagiline at doses up to 1 mg x kg(-1). Rasagiline does not modify CNS monoamine tissue levels or monoamine-induced behavioural syndromes at doses which selectively inhibit MAO-B but not MAO-A.

Impact of sustained deprenyl (selegiline) in levodopa-treated Parkinson's disease: a randomized placebo-controlled extension of the deprenyl and tocopherol antioxidative therapy of parkinsonism trial

Deprenyl (selegiline) delays the need for levodopa therapy in patients with early Parkinson's disease, but the long-term benefits of this treatment remain unclear. During 1987 to 1988, 800 patients with early Parkinson's disease were randomized in the Deprenyl and Tocopherol Antioxidative Therapy of Parkinsonism trial to receive deprenyl, tocopherol, combined treatments, or a placebo and were then placed on active deprenyl (10mg/day). A second, independent randomization was carried out in early 1993 for 368 subjects who by that time had required levodopa and who had consented to continuing the deprenyl treatment (D subjects) or changing to a matching placebo (P subjects) under double-blind conditions. The first development of wearing off, dyskinesias, or on-off motor fluctuations was the prespecified primary outcome measure. During the average 2-year follow-up, there were no differences between the treatment groups with respect to the primary outcome measure (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.63, 1.19; p = 0.38), withdrawal from the study, death, or adverse events. Although 34% of D subjects developed dyskinesias and only 19% of P subjects did (p = 0.006), only 16% of D subjects developed freezing of gait but 29% of P subjects did (p = 0.0003). Decline in motor performance was less in D subjects than P subjects. Levodopa-treated Parkinson's disease patients who had been treated with deprenyl for up to 7 years, compared with patients who were changed to a placebo after about 5 years, experienced slower motor decline and were more likely to develop dyskinesias but less likely to develop freezing of gait.

Changes in vascular alpha 1- and alpha 2-adrenoceptor responsiveness by selegiline treatment

Pharmacoepidemiological studies have reported an excess of mortality with selegiline, a MAO B inhibitor used in the treatment of Parkinson's disease. The mechanism of this putative adverse effect remains unknown but an interaction with the sympathetic nervous system was suggested. The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of selegiline (10 mg/daily, orally during one week) on vascular alpha1- and alpha2-adrenoceptor responsiveness in conscious unrestrained dogs. Selegiline significantly increased resting values of both systolic and diastolic blood pressures and noradrenaline plasma levels (HPLC) without changing heart rate. Moreover, spectral analysis of systolic blood pressure (Fast Fourier Transformation) showed that selegiline increased the relative energy of a low frequency band without modifying the total spectrum. ED 50 calculated from dose-pressor response curves with phenylephrine (after beta-blockade by propranolol), an index of alpha1-adrenoceptor response or with noradrenaline (after alpha1- and beta blockade by prazosin plus propranolol), an index of alpha2-adrenoceptor response, were significantly higher after selegiline. Selegiline failed to modify the number of platelet alpha2-adrenoceptors measured by [(3)H] RX 821002 binding. Yohimbine-induced increase in noradrenaline release was significantly more marked after selegiline. These results support the evidence that selegiline induces a vascular alpha1- and alpha2-adrenoceptor-hyposensitivity that can be explained by the increase in noradrenaline release elicited by the drug.

The effect of catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibition with entacapone on cardiovascular autonomic responses in L-Dopa-treated patients with Parkinson's disease

We have compared the effects of entacapone, a peripherally acting catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitor, and placebo on cardiovascular autonomic responses in L-Dopa/dopa decarboxylase inhibitor-treated patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). In a double-blind, randomized, crossover study with two consecutive 1-week treatment periods, a battery of cardiovascular reflex tests (orthostatic, Valsalva, deep breathing, and isometric hand grip tests) was performed in a group of 15 patients with idiopathic PD. The first set of tests was performed after withholding L-Dopa overnight (control, "off" stage). The second and third sets of tests were performed in "on" stage after 1-week treatment with either entacapone 200 mg or placebo administered with each dose of L-Dopa/dopa decarboxylase (DDC) inhibitor. Valsalva, deep breathing, and orthostatic tests demonstrated no statistically significant differences in the ratio of the longest and shortest electrocardiographic R-to-R wave (R-R) intervals between entacapone and placebo or between study treatments and control. Blood pressure responses to both orthostatic challenge and prolonged isometric work (hand grip test) were similar between treatments. Systolic orthostatic hypotension was observed in only one patient during the control test, but it occurred more frequently after L-Dopa/DDC inhibitor, regardless of concomitant administration of either entacapone (n = 3) or placebo (n = 4). Peripheral COMT inhibition with entacapone does not significantly alter cardiovascular autonomic responses in L-Dopa-treated patients with PD.

Adverse drug reactions to selegiline: a review of the French pharmacovigilance database

The present pharmacoepidemiologic study was performed to characterize the profile of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) reported with selegiline, a monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) inhibitor used in the treatment of Parkinson's disease and previously reported to induce an excess of mortality. The analysis was performed with use of the French Pharmacovigilance Database between 1989 and 1997. This database includes all ADRs reported by French practitioners (and especially "serious" and "unexpected" ADRs). Three different analyses were performed: identification of ADRs reported with selegiline, comparison with the ADR profile observed with other antiparkinsonian drugs, and a case/non-case study investigating the occurrence of cardiovascular ADRs with selegiline in comparison with other drugs in general and other antiparkinsonian drugs (e.g., levodopa [L-Dopa], dopamine agonists) in particular. The most often reported ADRs with selegiline were psychiatric (delirium, hallucinations, agitations), cardiovascular (orthostatic hypotension, arterial hypertension, etc.) and neurologic (sedation, abnormal movements, etc.). Psychiatric and cardiovascular ADRs were more frequently reported with selegiline than with L-Dopa or dopamine agonists. The case/ non-case study found an increased risk of cardiovascular ADRs (OR = 1.72; 95% Cl = 1.16-2.55)when selegiline was associated with L-Dopa. These data show that the profile of selegiline-induced ADRs differs from that of other antiparkinsonian drugs (L-Dopa, dopamine agonists) with more psychiatric and cardiovascular ADRs. We suggest that the higher frequency of cardiovascular ADRs could explain, at least partially, the previously reported increase in mortality rate.

Mechanism underlying anti-apoptotic activity of a (-)deprenyl-related propargylamine, rasagiline

A potent inhibitor of type B monoamine oxidase, (-)deprenyl, is known to protect or rescue dying neurons, independent of inhibition of the enzyme activity. After long term administration to rodents, a propargylamine structurally related to (-)deprenyl, (R)(+)-N-propargyl-1-aminoindan (rasagiline) increased the activities of anti-oxidative enzymes, superoxide dismutase and catalase. Rasagiline protected in vitro dopamine cells from apoptosis induced by oxidative stress or neurotoxins. The mechanism of the anti-apoptotic effect was studied by in vitro experiments using human dopaminergic neuroblastoma, SH-SY5Y cells. Peroxynitrite-generating N-morpholino sydonimine (SIN-1) induced apoptosis in SH-SY5Y cells via disruption of mitochondrial membrane potential (DeltaPsim), followed by caspase 3 activation. Rasagiline prevented the loss of DeltaPsim, the initial step to apoptosis, and also following caspase 3-activation and DNA fragmentation. The results suggest that rasagiline may interact with the specific molecule in the mitochondria and suppress the death signal transduction. By the anti-apoptotic function, rasagiline may rescue or protect declining neurons in aging and neurodegenerative disorders, such as Parkinson's disease.

Postural hypotension: causes, clinical features, investigation, and management

Postural hypotension may result from various neurogenic and non-neurogenic causes. It may be a key feature of certain disorders, such as the primary chronic autonomic failure syndromes; it can complicate a variety of diseases, such as diabetes mellitus; and its prevalence increases with advancing age. When symptomatic, it may result in loss of consciousness and thus cause injury. Postural hypotension can be suspected from the patient's history and is readily documented in the clinic by measuring lying and standing blood pressure. The diagnosis ideally should be confirmed in the laboratory with additional tests to determine the cause and evaluate the functional deficit, so as to aid treatment. Treatment of the causative disorder is often curative when there are non-neurogenic causes. A combination of nonpharmacological and pharmacological measures is needed in the management of neurogenic postural hypotension.

Selegiline-induced postural hypotension in Parkinson's disease: a longitudinal study on the effects of drug withdrawal

OBJECTIVES

The United Kingdom Parkinson's Disease Research Group (UKPDRG) trial found an increased mortality in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) randomized to receive 10 mg selegiline per day and L-dopa compared with those taking L-dopa alone. Recently, we found that therapy with selegiline and L-dopa was associated with selective systolic orthostatic hypotension which was abolished by withdrawal of selegiline. This unwanted effect on postural blood pressure was not the result of underlying autonomic failure. The aims of this study were to confirm our previous findings in a separate cohort of patients and to determine the time course of the cardiovascular consequences of stopping selegiline in the expectation that this might shed light on the mechanisms by which the drug causes orthostatic hypotension.

METHODS

The cardiovascular responses to standing and head-up tilt were studied repeatedly in PD patients receiving selegiline and as the drug was withdrawn.

RESULTS

Head-up tilt caused systolic orthostatic hypotension which was marked in six of 20 PD patients on selegiline, one of whom lost consciousness with unrecordable blood pressures. A lesser degree of orthostatic hypotension occurred with standing. Orthostatic hypotension was ameliorated 4 days after withdrawal of selegiline and totally abolished 7 days after discontinuation of the drug. Stopping selegiline also significantly reduced the supine systolic and diastolic blood pressures consistent with a previously undescribed supine pressor action.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms our previous finding that selegiline in combination with L-dopa is associated with selective orthostatic hypotension. The possibilities that these cardiovascular findings might be the result of non-selective inhibition of monoamine oxidase or of amphetamine and metamphetamine are discussed.

Monoamine oxidase and catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors

Despite advances in the treatment of PD, there remain significant unmet therapeutic needs. This is particularly true at the later stages of the disease when dopaminergic therapy is complicated by motor fluctuations and dyskinesias. Inhibition of dopamine metabolism is a valuable adjunct to exogenous dopaminergic replacement. Inhibitors of MAO-B have been used to treat early and advanced PD for a number of years. Although controversy remains, existing evidence still raises the possibility that MAO-B inhibition may confer a protective effect in PD, delaying the progression of the underlying pathology. More recently, clinically useful inhibitors of COMT have become available. These medications largely act peripherally to increase the pool of available dopamine precursor and prolong the duration of effect of L-dopa. They are indicated primarily for control of motor fluctuations.

Investigation by Parkinson's Disease Research Group of United Kingdom into excess mortality seen with combined levodopa and selegiline treatment in patients with early, mild Parkinson's disease: further results of randomised trial and confidential inquiry

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the excess mortality observed in patients who received both levodopa and selegiline in a randomised trial could be explained by revised diagnosis of Parkinson's disease, autonomic or cardiovascular effects, more rapid disease progression, or drug interactions.

DESIGN

Open randomised trial and blind comparison and reclassification of the cause of death of patients who were recruited from 93 hospitals between 1985 and 1990 and who had died before December 1993 in arms 1 and 2.

SETTING

United Kingdom.

SUBJECTS

624 patients with early Parkinson's disease who were not receiving dopaminergic treatment and a subgroup fo 120 patients who died during the trial.

INTERVENTIONS

Levodopa and a dopa carboxylase inhibitor (arm 1), levodopa and a dopa decarboxylase inhibitor in combination with selegiline (arm 2), or bromocriptine alone (arm 3).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

All cause mortality for 520 subjects in arms 1 and 2 and for 104 subjects who were randomised into these arms from arm 3. Cause specific mortality for people who died in the original arms 1 and 2 on the basis of the opinion of a panel, revised diagnosis and disability ratings, evidence from clinical records of either autonomic or cardiovascular episodes, other clinical features before death, and drug interactions.

RESULTS

After extended follow up (mean 6.8 years) until the end of September 1995, when arm 2 was terminated, the hazard ratio for arm 2 compared with arm 1 was 1.32 (95% confidence interval 0.98 to 1.79). For subjects who were randomised from arm 3 the hazard ratio for arm 2 was 1.54 (0.83 to 2.87). When all subjects were included the hazard ratio was 1.33 (1.02 to 1.74) and after adjustment for other baseline factors it was 1.30 (0.99 to 1.72). The excess mortality seemed to be greatest in the third and fourth year of follow up. Cause specific death rates showed an excess of deaths from Parkinson's disease only (hazard ratio 2.5 (1.3 to 4.7)). No significant differences were found for revised diagnosis, disability rating scores, autonomic or cardiovascular events, other clinical features, or drug interactions. Patients who died in arm 2 were more likely to have had possible dementia and a history of falls before death compared with those who died in arm 1.

CONCLUSION

The results consistently show excess mortality in patients treated with combined levodopa and selegiline. Revised diagnosis, autonomic or cardiovascular events, or drug interactions could not explain this finding, but falls and possible dementia were more common in arm 2. The results do not support combined treatment in patients with newly diagnosed Parkinson's disease. In more advanced disease, combined treatment should perhaps be avoided in patients with postural hypotension, frequent falls, confusion, or dementia.