Opportunistic Screening at Abdominal CT: Use of Automated Body Composition Biomarkers for Added Cardiometabolic Value

Value-added Opportunistic CT Screening: State of the Art

Opportunistic CT screening leverages robust imaging data embedded within abdominal and thoracic scans that are generally unrelated to the specific clinical indication and have heretofore gone largely unused. This incidental imaging information may prove beneficial to patients in terms of wellness, prevention, risk profiling, and presymptomatic detection of relevant disease. The growing interest in CT-based opportunistic screening relates to a confluence of factors: the objective and generalizable nature of CT-based body composition measures, the emergence of fully automated explainable AI solutions, the sheer volume of body CT scans performed, and the increasing emphasis on precision medicine and value-added initiatives. With a systematic approach to body composition and other useful CT markers, initial evidence suggests that their ability to help radiologists assess biologic age and predict future adverse cardiometabolic events rivals even the best available clinical reference standards. Emerging data suggest that standalone "intended" CT screening over an unorganized opportunistic approach may be justified, especially when combined with established cancer screening. This review will discuss the current status of opportunistic CT screening, including specific body composition markers and the various disease processes that may be impacted. The remaining hurdles to widespread clinical adoption include generalization to more diverse patient populations, disparate technical settings, and reimbursement.

Fully Automated Abdominal CT Biomarkers for Type 2 Diabetes Using Deep Learning

Background CT biomarkers both inside and outside the pancreas can potentially be used to diagnose type 2 diabetes mellitus. Previous studies on this topic have shown significant results but were limited by manual methods and small study samples. Purpose To investigate abdominal CT biomarkers for type 2 diabetes mellitus in a large clinical data set using fully automated deep learning. Materials and Methods For external validation, noncontrast abdominal CT images were retrospectively collected from consecutive patients who underwent routine colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography from 2004 to 2016. The pancreas was segmented using a deep learning method that outputs measurements of interest, including CT attenuation, volume, fat content, and pancreas fractal dimension. Additional biomarkers assessed included visceral fat, atherosclerotic plaque, liver and muscle CT attenuation, and muscle volume. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed, separating patients into groups based on time between type 2 diabetes diagnosis and CT date and including clinical factors such as sex, age, body mass index (BMI), BMI greater than 30 kg/m², and height. The best set of predictors for type 2 diabetes were determined using multinomial logistic regression. Results A total of 8992 patients (mean age, 57 years ± 8 [SD]; 5009 women) were evaluated in the test set, of whom 572 had type 2 diabetes mellitus. The deep learning model had a mean Dice similarity coefficient for the pancreas of 0.69 ± 0.17, similar to the interobserver Dice similarity coefficient of 0.69 ± 0.09 (P = .92). The univariable analysis showed that patients with diabetes had, on average, lower pancreatic CT attenuation (mean, 18.74 HU ± 16.54 vs 29.99 HU ± 13.41; P < .0001) and greater visceral fat volume (mean, 235.0 mL ± 108.6 vs 130.9 mL ± 96.3; P < .0001) than those without diabetes. Patients with diabetes also showed a progressive decrease in pancreatic attenuation with greater duration of disease. The final multivariable model showed pairwise areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) of 0.81 and 0.85 between patients without and patients with diabetes who were diagnosed 0-2499 days before and after undergoing CT, respectively. In the multivariable analysis, adding clinical data did not improve upon CT-based AUC performance (AUC = 0.67 for the CT-only model vs 0.68 for the CT and clinical model). The best predictors of type 2 diabetes mellitus included intrapancreatic fat percentage, pancreatic fractal dimension, plaque severity between the L1 and L4 vertebra levels, average liver CT attenuation, and BMI. Conclusion The diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus was associated with abdominal CT biomarkers, especially measures of pancreatic CT attenuation and visceral fat. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Computed Tomography Assessment of Sarcopenic Myosteatosis for Predicting Overall Survival in Colorectal Carcinoma: Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

As the US population ages, cancer incidence and prevalence are projected to increase. In the last decade, there has been an increased interest in the opportunistic use of computed tomography (CT) scan data to predict cancer prognosis and inform treatment based on body composition measures, especially muscle measures for sarcopenia.

OBJECTIVE

This article aimed to perform a systematic review of current literature related to CT assessment of muscle attenuation values for myosteatosis in colorectal cancer (CRC) survival prediction.

RESULTS

Initial broad search of CT and CRC yielded 4234 results. A more focused search strategy narrowed this to 129 research papers, and 13 articles met the final inclusion criteria. Twelve of 13 studies found a statistically significant decrease in overall survival according to Hounsfield unit (HU)-based sarcopenia, with hazard ratios ranging from 1.36 to 2.94 (mean, 1.78). However, the specific criteria used to define myosteatosis by CT varied widely, with attenuation thresholds ranging from 22.5 to 47.3 HU, often further subdivided by sex and/or body mass index.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence suggests that a strong association between CT-based muscle attenuation values for myosteatosis assessment correlates with overall survival in CRC. However, more research is needed to verify these findings and determine appropriate threshold values for more diverse patient populations. Because CRC patients are staged and followed by CT, the opportunity exists for routine objective myosteatosis assessment in the clinical setting.

Body composition assessment: comparison of quantitative values between magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography

Background

The primary objective of this study was to compare measurements of skeletal muscle index (SMI), visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) at the level of L3, on subjects who underwent computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations within a three-month period. The secondary objective was to compare the automatic and semi-automatic quantifications of the same values for CT images.

Methods

Among subjects who underwent CT and MRI at our Institution between 2011 and 2020, exclusion criteria were: presence of extensive artifacts; images not including the whole waist circumference; CT acquired with low-dose technique and lack of non-contrast images. A set of three axial images (CT, MRI T1-weighted and T2-weighted) were used to extract the following measurements with semi-automatic segmentations: SMI [calculated normalizing skeletal muscle area (SMA) by the square height], SAT, VAT. For the CT images only, the same values were also calculated by using automatic segmentation. Statistical analysis was performed comparing quantitative MRI and CT measurements by Pearson correlation analysis and by Bland-Altman agreement analysis.

Results

A total of 123 patients were included. By performing linear regression analysis, CT and MRI measurements of SMI showed a high correlation (r²=0.81 for T1, r²=0.89 for T2), with a mean logarithmic difference between CT and MRI quantitative values of 0.041 for T1-weighted and 0.072 for T2-weighted images. CT and MRI measurements of SAT showed high correlation (r²=0.81 for T1; r²=0.81 for T2), with a mean logarithmic difference between CT and MRI values of 0.0174 for T1-weighted and 0.201 for T2-weighted images. CT and MRI measurements of VAT showed high correlation (r²=0.94 for T1; r²=0.93 for T2), with a mean logarithmic difference of 0.040 for T1-weighted and -0.084 for T2-weighted images. The comparison of values extracted by semi-automatic and automatic segmentations were highly correlated.

Conclusions

Quantification of body composition values at MRI from T1-weighted and T2-weighted images was highly correlated to same values at CT, therefore quantitative values of body composition among patients who underwent either one of the examinations may be compared. CT body composition values extracted by semi-automatic and automatic segmentations showed high correlation.

Fully Automated Deep Learning Tool for Sarcopenia Assessment on CT: L1 Versus L3 Vertebral Level Muscle Measurements for Opportunistic Prediction of Adverse Clinical Outcomes

BACKGROUND. Sarcopenia is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. CT-based skeletal muscle measurements for sarcopenia assessment are most commonly performed at the L3 vertebral level. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to compare the utility of fully automated deep learning CT-based muscle quantitation at the L1 versus L3 level for predicting future hip fractures and death. METHODS. This retrospective study included 9223 asymptomatic adults (mean age, 57 ± 8 [SD] years; 4071 men, 5152 women) who underwent unenhanced low-dose abdominal CT. A previously validated fully automated deep learning tool was used to assess muscle for myosteatosis (by mean attenuation) and myopenia (by cross-sectional area) at the L1 and L3 levels. Performance for predicting hip fractures and death was compared between L1 and L3 measures. Performance for predicting hip fractures and death was also evaluated using the established clinical risk scores from the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) and Framingham risk score (FRS), respectively. RESULTS. Median clinical follow-up interval after CT was 8.8 years (interquartile range, 5.1-11.6 years), yielding hip fractures and death in 219 (2.4%) and 549 (6.0%) patients, respectively. L1-level and L3-level muscle attenuation measurements were not different in 2-, 5-, or 10-year AUC for hip fracture (p = .18-.98) or death (p = .19-.95). For hip fracture, 5-year AUCs for L1-level muscle attenuation, L3-level muscle attenuation, and FRAX score were 0.717, 0.709, and 0.708, respectively. For death, 5-year AUCs for L1-level muscle attenuation, L3-level muscle attenuation, and FRS were 0.737, 0.721, and 0.688, respectively. Lowest quartile hazard ratios (HRs) for hip fracture were 2.20 (L1 attenuation), 2.45 (L3 attenuation), and 2.53 (FRAX score), and for death were 3.25 (L1 attenuation), 3.58 (L3 attenuation), and 2.82 (FRS). CT-based muscle cross-sectional area measurements at L1 and L3 were less predictive for hip fracture and death (5-year AUC ≤ 0.571; HR ≤ 1.56). CONCLUSION. Automated CT-based measurements of muscle attenuation for myosteatosis at the L1 level compare favorably with previously established L3-level measurements and clinical risk scores for predicting hip fracture and death. Assessment for myopenia was less predictive of outcomes at both levels. CLINICAL IMPACT. Alternative use of the L1 rather than L3 level for CT-based muscle measurements allows sarcopenia assessment using both chest and abdominal CT scans, greatly increasing the potential yield of opportunistic CT screening.

Liver Steatosis Categorization on Contrast-Enhanced CT Using a Fully Automated Deep Learning Volumetric Segmentation Tool: Evaluation in 1204 Healthy Adults Using Unenhanced CT as a Reference Standard

BACKGROUND. Hepatic attenuation at unenhanced CT is linearly correlated with the MRI proton density fat fraction (PDFF). Liver fat quantification at contrast-enhanced CT is more challenging. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to evaluate liver steatosis categorization on contrast-enhanced CT using a fully automated deep learning volumetric hepatosplenic segmentation algorithm and unenhanced CT as the reference standard. METHODS. A fully automated volumetric hepatosplenic segmentation algorithm using 3D convolutional neural networks was applied to unenhanced and contrast-enhanced series from a sample of 1204 healthy adults (mean age, 45.2 years; 726 women, 478 men) undergoing CT evaluation for renal donation. The mean volumetric attenuation was computed from all designated liver and spleen voxels. PDFF was estimated from unenhanced CT attenuation and served as the reference standard. Contrast-enhanced attenuations were evaluated for detecting PDFF thresholds of 5% (mild steatosis, 10% and 15% (moderate steatosis); PDFF less than 5% was considered normal. RESULTS. Using unenhanced CT as reference, estimated PDFF was ≥ 5% (mild steatosis), ≥ 10%, and ≥ 15% (moderate steatosis) in 50.1% (n = 603), 12.5% (n = 151) and 4.8% (n = 58) of patients, respectively. ROC AUC values for predicting PDFF thresholds of 5%, 10%, and 15% using contrast-enhanced liver attenuation were 0.669, 0.854, and 0.962, respectively, and using contrast-enhanced liver-spleen attenuation difference were 0.662, 0.866, and 0.986, respectively. A total of 96.8% (90/93) of patients with contrast-enhanced liver attenuation less than 90 HU had steatosis (PDFF ≥ 5%); this threshold of less than 90 HU achieved sensitivity of 75.9% and specificity of 95.7% for moderate steatosis (PDFF ≥ 15%). Liver attenuation less than 100 HU achieved sensitivity of 34.0% and specificity of 94.2% for any steatosis (PDFF ≥ 5%). A total of 93.8% (30/32) of patients with contrast-enhanced liver-spleen attenuation difference 10 HU or less had moderate steatosis (PDFF ≥ 15%); a liver-spleen difference less than 5 HU achieved sensitivity of 91.4% and specificity of 95.0% for moderate steatosis. Liver-spleen difference less than 10 HU achieved sensitivity of 29.5% and specificity of 95.5% for any steatosis (PDFF ≥ 5%). CONCLUSION. Contrast-enhanced volumetric hepatosplenic attenuation derived using a fully automated deep learning CT tool may allow objective categoric assessment of hepatic steatosis. Accuracy was better for moderate than mild steatosis. Further confirmation using different scanning protocols and vendors is warranted. CLINICAL IMPACT. If these results are confirmed in independent patient samples, this automated approach could prove useful for both individualized and population-based steatosis assessment.