Assessment of disease activity in ulcerative colitis by faecal calprotectin, a novel granulocyte marker protein

Clinical implications of assay specific differences in f-calprotectin when monitoring inflammatory bowel disease activity over time

OBJECTIVE

With several faecal calprotectin (FC) assays on the market, it has been difficult to define a uniform threshold for discriminating between remission and active disease in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We aimed to compare the results of different FC-assays in IBD patients, followed over time.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

IBD patients provided faecal samples and reported clinical activity every third month prospectively over a two year period. FC was measured with two ELISA - (Bühlmann and Immunodiagnostik) and one automated fluoroimmunoassay (Phadia).

RESULTS

In total, 13 patients provided 91 faecal samples. The median (IQR) concentration of FC was higher at active disease than at remission for all assays: Bühlmann 845 (1061-226) μg/g versus 62 (224-39) μg/g, Phadia 369 (975-122) μg/g versus 11 (52-11) μg/g, and Immundiagnostik 135 (302-69) μg/g versus 8 (56-4) μg/g. The Bühlmann assay produced the largest absolute difference but the corresponding relative difference seemed to be more pronounced when analysed by the Phadia - (ratio of means 8.5; 95% CI 3.3-21.9) or the Immundiagnostik assay (ratio of means 7.4; 95% CI 3.1-17.6) than by the Bühlmann assay (ratio of means 5.3; 95% CI 2.7-10.6). Consequently, the specificity for discriminating active disease from remission varied between assays (34-75%) when the cut-off 50 μg/g was used, whereas the differences in sensitivity were less pronounced.

CONCLUSIONS

Cross-comparisons revealed overall poor agreement between the assays as well as differences in the dynamics of FC. These findings suggest that standardisation of the method is needed to implement FC as a disease monitoring tool at large-scale.

Patient-performed extraction of faecal calprotectin

BACKGROUND

Faecal (f-) calprotectin is a widely used marker for intestinal inflammation. However, extraction procedure is time consuming and cumbersome. The main aim of this study was to evaluate patient-performed extraction of f-calprotectin compared to extraction performed in the laboratory.

METHODS

A total of 81 adult patients with an established diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease provided two samples from the same bowel movement, one conventional faeces sample and one sample with a patient administered extraction device. A laboratory technician extracted the conventional faeces sample with the same extraction device.

RESULTS

F-calprotectin results from the laboratory-performed extraction and the patient-performed extraction correlated significantly, with a Spearman rank correlation coefficient of 0.92. Method comparison showed a slope of 1.20 (95% confidence interval 1.08-1.36) with intercept of -0.30 (95% confidence interval -9.00 to 4.62). This demonstrates a small proportional difference between the results from the home extracted samples and the results from the laboratory extracted samples, where the home extracted samples are slightly higher. However, six of the 81 patients had made obvious mistakes in the extraction process and their samples were excluded from the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient administered extraction of f-calprotectin can be a realistic alternative for selected patients. However, instructions must be very precise to avoid mistakes.

Neutrophils in ulcerative colitis: a review of selected biomarkers and their potential therapeutic implications

OBJECTIVES

This review article describes the role of neutrophils in mucosal injury and the resulting crypt abscesses characteristic of ulcerative colitis. We also review selected biomarkers for monitoring neutrophil presence and activity in the mucosa as well as their potential as therapeutic targets.

MATERIAL

We have collated and selectively reviewed data on the most prominent well-established and emerging neutrophil-related biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets (calprotectin, lactoferrin, CXCR1, CXCR2, MMP-9, NGAL, elafin, HNE, pANCAs, MPO, CD16, CD177, CD64, HNPs, SLPI and PTX3) in ulcerative colitis.

RESULTS

Systemic and intestinal neutrophil activity increases substantially in active ulcerative colitis, driving tissue damage and extra-intestinal manifestations. Calprotectin is a robust neutrophil and disease biomarker, and a few neutrophil-related targets are being clinically explored as therapeutic targets.

CONCLUSION

We propose that targeting neutrophils and their inflammatory mediators per se is an opportunity that should be explored to identify new effective medical therapies. The overall clinical goal for neutrophil-targeted therapy will be to modulate, but not completely silence, neutrophil activity, thereby abolishing the destructive inflammation with associated acute and chronic tissue damage without compromising host-defense.

A prospective single centre pilot evaluation of a serum calprotectin assay in unselected GI patients

BACKGROUND

Whilst C-reactive protein (CRP) is an established serum marker of inflammation, its use in gastroenterology has been limited by its poor sensitivity and specificity for GI disease. Faecal calprotectin (FC) has been adopted into mainstream GI practice as a sensitive but non-specific marker of intestinal inflammation. However, stool samples collection for FC can be challenging and the possibility of utilising a sensitive and specific serum biomarker of intestinal inflammation in luminal gastroenterology is an attractive prospect. This work investigates the performance of serum calprotectin (SC) compared to current biomarkers, FC and CRP, in an unselected cohort of patients attending our GI unit.

METHODS

Patients attending in and outpatients within an adult GI service who submitted a stool sample for FC analysis were identified. A total of 109 who had a serum sample obtained within one day of stool sample collection had the serum analysed for CRP and SC and the correlation between these biomarkers was investigated.

RESULTS

The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between SC, FC and CRP was 0.10, 95% CI -0.09-0.28 and 0.18, 95% CI -0.01-0.35, respectively. The ICC between FC and CRP was 0.18, 95% CI -0.01-0.35.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data reveals that there is no significant correlation between SC and FC, nor between SC and CRP in a large unselected cohort of GI patients. Therefore, as a serum biomarker for intestinal inflammation, SC is unlikely to be of clinical utility and the search for an appropriate serum GI biomarker continues.

New Biomarkers for Diagnosing Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Assessing Treatment Outcomes

Despite advances in our understanding of the pathophysiology underlying inflammatory bowel disease, there remains a significant need for biomarkers that can differentiate between Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis with high sensitivity and specificity, in a cost-efficient manner. As the focus on personalized approaches to the delivery of medical treatment increases, new biomarkers are being developed to predict an individual's response to therapy and their overall disease course. In this review, we will outline many of the existing and recently developed biomarkers, detailing their role in the assessment of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. We will identify opportunities for improvement in our biomarkers, including better differentiation between the subtypes of inflammatory bowel disease. We will also discuss new targets and strategies in biomarker development, including combining modalities to create biomarker signatures to improve the ability to predict disease courses and response to therapy among individual patients.

Extending landscape of volatile metabolites as novel diagnostic biomarkers of inflammatory bowel disease - a review

The diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains a challenging task despite significant increase in the understanding of the disease aetiology and pathogenesis. Recent decade has seen a massive interest in the non-invasive diagnostic biomarkers of IBD, consequently a number of studies have explored a variety of potential biomarkers to diagnose the disease and monitor the disease activity. Volatile metabolites are the chemicals, which emanate from biological fluids and can reflect the status of health and disease of an individual. Recent advances in the analytical techniques have enabled the detection and interpretation of the changes in volatile metabolites in breath, urine, faeces and blood of an individual in correlation with various gastrointestinal (GI) disorders including IBD. This can provide a simple, fast and reproducible diagnosis at the point of care. This review focuses on the current and future novel approaches for detecting and the monitoring gut inflammation in IBD by using volatile organic metabolites.

Clinical importance of faecal calprotectin variability in inflammatory bowel disease: intra-individual variability and standardisation of sampling procedure

OBJECTIVE

Faecal (f-) calprotectin is a biomarker of intestinal inflammation. Previous studies have described intra-individual day-to-day variability of this biomarker in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and morning samples have been suggested for standardisation purposes. With this project, we investigated if day-to-day variability differed from diurnal variability. Additionally, we evaluated a new extraction method for f-calprotectin analysis.

METHODS

Fifty patients provided three faeces samples from morning - evening - morning on two consecutive days. Nineteen patients provided two faeces samples from the same bowel movement, one conventional spot sample, and one sample with a device for patient-administered sampling and extraction.

RESULTS

The two morning samples differentiated between mucosal inflammation and mucosal healing with same level of agreement as the two samples from the same day (kappa 0.76), using an f-calprotectin cut-off level of 259 μg/g. Although large intra-individual variation in f-calprotectin values, there were no significant day-to-day (p = 0.096) or diurnal variation (p = 0.78). Used by laboratory technicians, the new extraction device correlated significantly with the conventional extraction method (p < 0.001), Spearman's rank correlation coefficient 0.95. Of the 19 patients testing patient administered extraction, two patients provided samples leading to considerably higher f-calprotectin levels than conventional sampling procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

The reliability of f-calprotectin morning samples is equal to the reliability of samples from different bowel movements on the same day. The new extraction method is reliable when used by laboratory technicians, but larger studies are recommended to evaluate patient administered extraction.

Assessment of disease activity in pediatric ulcerative colitis

To date, we encounter more and more pediatric patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). For yet unclear reasons, UC in pediatric patients seems to be a more aggressive and extensive disease than in their adult counterparts. In the majority of pediatric patients, the disease presents as pancolitis. The severity of the disease is reflected in the high use of corticosteroids and immunosuppressants and a high rate of surgery for medically refractory patients. The means by which to assess disease activity or to accurately predict its course are far from optimal. This review summarizes the current knowledge on the means for assessing UC activity in children. Research for developing new tools by which to monitor and forecast disease activity, are needed in all areas including invasive endoscopy, clinical evaluation, and treatment follow-up.

FOCUS: Future of fecal calprotectin utility study in inflammatory bowel disease

AIM

To evaluate the perspective of gastroenterologists regarding the impact of fecal calprotectin (FC) on the management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

METHODS

Patients with known IBD or symptoms suggestive of IBD for whom the physician identified that FC would be clinically useful were recruited. Physicians completed an online “pre survey” outlining their rationale for the test. After receipt of the test results, the physicians completed an online “post survey” to portray their perceived impact of the test result on patient management. Clinical outcomes for a subset of patients with follow-up data available beyond the completion of the “post survey” were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 373 test kits distributed, 290 were returned, resulting in 279 fully completed surveys. One hundred and ninety patients were known to have IBD; 147 (77%) with Crohn’s Disease, 43 (21%) Ulcerative Colitis and 5 (2%) IBD unclassified. Indications for FC testing included: 90 (32.2%) to differentiate a new diagnosis of IBD from Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS), 85 (30.5%) to distinguish symptoms of IBS from IBD in those known to have IBD and 104 (37.2%) as an objective measure of inflammation. FC levels resulted in a change in management 51.3% (143/279) of the time which included a significant reduction in the number of colonoscopies (118) performed (P < 0.001). Overall, 97.5% (272/279) of the time, the physicians found the test sufficiently useful that they would order it again in similar situations. Follow-up data was available for 172 patients with further support for the clinical utility of FC provided.

CONCLUSION

The FC test effected a change in management 51.3% of the time and receipt of the result was associated with a reduction in the number of colonoscopies performed.

Calprotectin as a diagnostic tool for inflammatory bowel diseases

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are chronic intestinal disorders caused by a number of factors, including external influences, intestinal microbiota and genetics. The two major clinically defined types of IBD are Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, each of which is characterized by relapses in the clinical course, thus patients must be under constant observation via regular endoscopies. As endoscopy, which has been used for direct evaluation and diagnosis of IBD, requires uncomfortable and expensive bowel preparation, a non-invasive test was required to reduce the number of patients undergoing unnecessary endoscopy. Calprotectin is a protein occurring in the cytosol of inflammatory cells and is released by the activation of leukocytes. As it is elevated and stable in the faeces of patients with IBD and can be reliably detected in faecal samples of <5 g, it may serve as an inexpensive, non-invasive diagnostic method for IBD. This is explored in the following review.

The prognostic significance of faecal calprotectin in patients with inactive inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Faecal calprotectin, an established biomarker used to assess mucosal inflammation, has been shown to correlate with endoscopic activity in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Longitudinal monitoring of faecal calprotectin, however, has rarely been employed beyond assessment of therapy response and post hoc analyses of clinical trials.

AIM

To study whether consecutive measurements of faecal calprotectin every third month are useful for monitoring patients with IBD in clinical remission.

METHODS

Patients aged 18 years or older, with a known diagnosis of IBD in clinical remission, were prospectively studied. Patients provided faecal samples every third month and were prospectively followed until the first clinical relapse or the end of the 2-year follow-up period. Measurements (EK-CAL, Bühlmann Lab. AG, Switzerland) were done at the end of the study. A Cox model with time-dependent covariates was used for analysis.

RESULTS

Among 104 patients, Crohn's disease (n = 49) and ulcerative colitis (n = 55), 37 had a relapse. A doubling of faecal calprotectin level between two consecutively collected samples was associated with a 101% increased risk of relapse (HR: 2.01; 95% CI: 1.53-2.65; P < 0.001). The relative risk of relapse attenuated with time (HR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.75-0.86; P < 0.001), by a 20% decrease in risk of relapse per 3-month period since the sample was obtained.

CONCLUSIONS

By consecutively measuring faecal calprotectin every third month, we quantified the risk of relapse related to faecal calprotectin change and observed attenuation of the risk across time. Our data suggest that longitudinal monitoring of faecal calprotectin is informative in predicting relapse in IBD.

The Role of Laboratory Tests in Crohn's Disease

In the past, laboratory tests were considered of limited value in Crohn's disease (CD). In the era of biologics, laboratory tests have become essential to evaluate the inflammatory burden of the disease (C-reactive protein, fecal calprotectin) since symptoms-based scores are subjective, to predict the response to pharmacological options and the risk of relapse, to discriminate CD from ulcerative colitis, to select candidates to anti-tumor necrosis factors [screening tests looking for hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus status and latent tuberculosis], to assess the risk of adverse events (testing for thiopurine metabolites and thiopurine-methyltransferase activity), and to personalize and optimize therapy (therapeutic drug monitoring). Pharmacogenetics, though presently confined to the assessment of thiopurineme methyltransferase polymorphisms and hematological toxicity associated with thiopurine treatment, is a promising field that will contribute to a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms of the variability in response to the drugs used in CD with the attempt to expand personalized care and precision medicine strategies.

Calprotectin: Clinical Applications in Pediatrics

As seen over the past 20 years, calprotectin has evolved as a novel, non-invasive biomarker of gastrointestinal (GI) inflammation. We present this review of calprotectin in pediatrics. This article will focus on studies using calprotectin concentrations from different body fluids to monitor inflammation in different disease states and conditions. The ultimate goal of our group is to lay down a foundation as we consider using calprotectin prospectively as a marker of intestinal inflammation that could lead to further testing and possibly a marker of preparedness for feeding. We surveyed all published studies in English of calprotectin in neonates, infants, children, and adolescents through February 2014. We will discuss calprotectin's basic properties and analysis such as characteristics, identification, presence in body fluids, and maturational development. In addition, calprotectin's use in inflammatory diseases exploring both GI and non-GI conditions will be evaluated and compared with other serum markers presently available. Finally, a summary of our findings and discussion of future work that could be undertaken in order to render calprotectin as a more useful monitoring tool to the medical research community will complete the review.

Elevated fecal levels of eosinophil granule proteins predict collagenous colitis in patients referred to colonoscopy due to chronic non-bloody diarrhea

OBJECTIVE

Colonoscopy with biopsy sampling is often performed to detect collagenous colitis (CC) and lymphocytic colitis (LC) in patients with chronic non-bloody diarrhea. However, the diagnostic yield is low and incurs high costs. Fecal calprotectin (FC) and myeloperoxidase (MPO) indicate intestinal inflammation in ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). In CC, elevated fecal levels of eosinophil protein X (EPX) and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) have been reported. We aimed to evaluate if F-EPX, F-ECP, FC, and F-MPO could predict the diagnostic outcome in patients with chronic non-bloody diarrhea referred to colonoscopy. We also evaluated serum (S) EPX and ECP in this regard.

METHODS

Of 67 included patients, 63 (94%) underwent colonoscopy with biopsy sampling. Fecal EPX, F-ECP, FC, F-MPO, S-EPX, and S-ECP were analyzed.

RESULTS

Diagnostic outcome: normal: n = 46 (73%), CC: n = 9 (14%), LC: n = 4 (6%), UC: n = 2 (3%), CD: n = 2 (3%). Higher levels of F-EPX and F-ECP were found in CC compared to a normal diagnostic outcome (p = 0.01). No change was noted in any of the fecal markers in LC. When all of the fecal markers were normal the probability of a normal diagnostic outcome was 92%. We found no differences in S-EPX and S-ECP between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Elevated F-EPX and F-ECP could predict CC. None of the fecal markers predicted LC. Serum-EPX and S-ECP are not useful for the diagnosis of CC, LC, UC, or CD. With normal levels in all of the analyzed fecal markers, there is a low probability of a pathologic diagnostic outcome.

Accuracy of 99mTc (V)-Dimercaptosuccinic Acid Scintigraphy and Fecal Calprotectin Compared with Colonoscopy in Localizing Active Lesions in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

INTRODUCTION

Due to limitation of colonoscopy in assessing the entire bowel and patients’ intolerance in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), in the current study, we aimed to prospectively compare the accuracy of ^99mTc(V)-dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) and fecal calprotectin with ileocolonoscopy as new methods for localizing inflammations.

METHODS

Current prospective study conducted between 2012 and 2014 on 30 patients with IBD attending Gastroenterology Clinic of Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Fecal calprotectin and disease activity were measured for all participants and all of them underwent ^99mTc (V)-DMSA scintigraphy and colonoscopy. The accuracy of ^99mTc (V)-DMSA scintigraphy and calprotectin in localizing bowel lesions were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 22 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and 8 patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) were evaluated in our study. Sensitivity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), and positive predictive value (PPV) of scintigraphy and calprotectin over colonoscopy in localization of UC lesions were 86.36%, 0.86%, 100.00% and 90.91%, 0.91, and 100.00%, respectively. Meanwhile, it showed 66.67% sensitivity and 81.25% specificity with PLR=3.56, negative likelihood ratio (NLR)=0.41, PPV=84.21%, and negative predictive value (NPV)= 61.90% in localizing lesions in patients with CD. The calprotectin level had sensitivity, PLR, and PPV of 90.00%, 0.90, and 100.00% in detecting active disease over colonoscopy, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The ^99mTc (V)-DMSA scintigraphy would be an accurate method for detecting active inflammation in follow-up of patients with IBD and assessing response to treatment as a non-invasive and complementary method beside colonoscopy for more accurate diagnosis of CD or UC.

Fecal calprotectin level correlated with both endoscopic severity and disease extent in ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

The relationship between fecal calprotectin (FC) and disease extent in ulcerative colitis (UC) has not been fully elucidated. The aim of this study was to clarify the correlation of FC with disease extent and severity in UC patients.

METHODS

UC patients scheduled to undergo an ileocolonoscopy were enrolled and fecal samples for FC measurement were collected prior to the procedure. A Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) was determined for each of 5 colonic segments. To evaluate the association of FC with extent of affected mucosa as well as disease severity, we assessed the correlation of FC level with the sum of MES (S-MES) for the 5 colonic segments as compared to the maximum score of MES (M-MES).

RESULTS

FC measurements in conjunction with findings from 136 complete colonoscopies in 102 UC patients were evaluated. FC level showed a stronger correlation with S-MES (correlation coefficient r = 0.86, p < 0.001) as compared to M-MES (r = 0.79, p < 0.001). In patients with an M-MES of 1, 2, and 3, FC level showed a significant correlation with S-MES (r = 0.67, p < 0.001; r = 0.70, p < 0.001; r = 0.47, p = 0.04, respectively). Our findings indicate that FC level is elevated in patients with greater areas of affected mucosa even in those with the same M-MES value.

CONCLUSIONS

FC level was shown to be correlated with the extent of affected mucosa as well as severity in UC patients, thus it is useful for precise assessment of mucosal inflammation.

Diagnosis and management of functional symptoms in inflammatory bowel disease in remission

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients in remission may suffer from gastrointestinal symptoms that resemble irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Knowledge on this issue has increased considerably in the last decade, and it is our intention to review and summarize it in the present work. We describe a problematic that comprises physiopathological uncertainties, diagnostic difficulties, as IBS-like symptoms are very similar to those produced by an inflammatory flare, and the necessity of appropriate management of these patients, who, although in remission, have impaired quality of life. Ultimately, from almost a philosophical point of view, the presence of IBS-like symptoms in IBD patients in remission supposes a challenge to the traditional functional-organic dichotomy, suggesting the need for a change of paradigm.

Fecal calprotectin in inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and irritable bowel syndrome share many symptoms. While irritable bowel syndrome is a functional bowel disorder for which no specific treatment is available, the range of effective therapies for IBD is evolving rapidly. Accurate diagnosis of IBD is therefore essential. Clinical assessment, together with various imaging modalities and endoscopy, has been the mainstay of diagnosis for many years. Fecal biomarkers of gastrointestinal inflammation have appeared in the past decade, of which calprotectin, a neutrophil cytosolic protein, has been studied the most. Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis are chronic remitting and relapsing diseases, and objective assessment of disease activity and response to treatment are important. This review focuses on the use of fecal calprotectin measurements in the diagnosis and monitoring of patients with IBD.

Plasma calprotectin level: usage in distinction of uncomplicated from complicated acute appendicitis

Background

The aim of this study was to identify the diagnostic role of plasma calprotectin value for a distinction of presence acute appendicitis and the indifference of uncomplicated from complicated acute appendicitis.

Methods

Plasma calprotectin, white blood cell and C-reactive protein values of 89 patients, who have undergone laparoscopic appendectomy between January 2013 and May 2013 were evaluated.

Results

Calprotectin was 91 ng/mL (range 45–538) for acute appendicitis and 47 ng/ml (range 28–205) for the control group. There was a positive, statistically significant relation between calprotectin and C-reactive protein values (r = 0. 292 p = 0. 001, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference was determined between calprotectin and white blood cell values (r = 0. 142 p = 0. 187, respectively). CRP and Cal values were significantly higher in patients with a complicated AA group than in those with uncomplicated AA (p = 0. 014, p = 0. 0001, respectively) whereas white blood cell counts did not differ significantly between two groups (p = 0. 164).

Conclusion

Plasma calprotectin levels were increased in patients with acute appendicitis and should use in a distinction of uncomplicated from complicated acute appendicitis patients.

Measurement of Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide as a Marker of Disease Activity in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Definitive diagnosis of IBD requires endoscopic and pathologic confirmation. These tools are also used to classify disease activity. Our aim was to determine if the fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) could be utilized to screen for IBD and assess for disease activity.

METHODS

We matched weighted IBD cases and controls from the 2009-2010 NHANES dataset. All subjects underwent measurement of FeNO using standardized techniques. We assessed for potential confounders for FeNO measurement including age, height, and asthma. For IBD subjects, we used the presence of diarrhea, fatigue, and weight loss as a proxy for IBD activity. Laboratory parameters examined to estimate disease activity included anemia (≤ 10 g/dl), iron deficiency (ferritin ≤ 20 ng/ml), hypoalbuminemia (≤ 3.2 g/dl), and CRP (≥ 1.1 mg/dl).

RESULTS

The weighted sample represented 199,414,901 subjects. The weighted prevalence of IBD was 2,084,895 (1.0%). IBD subjects had nearly the same FeNO level as those without IBD (17.0 ± 16.2 vs. 16.7 ± 14.5 ppb). The odds of a FeNO > 25 ppb was half (OR=0.501; 95% CI 0.497-0.504) for subjects with IBD compared to those without IBD after controlling for confounders. The AUROC curve for FeNO was 0.47 (0.35-0.59). FeNO levels were not higher in patients with laboratory values suggestive of active disease. FeNO levels were higher in IBD patients with diarrhea, rectal urgency, and fatigue but were lower in those with unintentional weight loss.

CONCLUSION

Measurement of FeNO does not appear to be useful to screen for IBD or assess disease activity.

Advantages of fecal lactoferrin measurement during granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis therapy in ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Fecal lactoferrin has been introduced as a useful tool for the diagnosis and monitoring of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The aim of this study was to assess if fecal lactoferrin can be employed to predict or estimate the effect of granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis (GMA) in ulcerative colitis (UC).

METHODS

This was a prospective study involving 21 patients with UC. Patients with moderately-to-severely active UC who were scheduled to undergo GMA were recruited. Changes in fecal lactoferrin concentration were compared between the GMA-responder and -nonresponder groups.

RESULTS

In the GMA-responder group, fecal lactoferrin significantly increased 1 week after the introduction of GMA and then significantly decreased after GMA sessions. Fecal lactoferrin concentrations were significantly higher in the GMA-responder group than in the GMA-nonresponder group at 1 and 2 weeks after the introduction of GMA. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that fecal lactoferrin concentration 1 week after the introduction of GMA was the most contributing factor for the effectiveness of GMA in patients with UC.

CONCLUSIONS

In the GMA-responder group, fecal lactoferrin concentration significantly increased 1 week after the introduction of GMA. Fecal lactoferrin may be beneficial for predicting clinical response of GMA in patients with UC at an early stage of GMA treatment.

Clinical application of faecal calprotectin in ulcerative colitis patients

OBJECTIVE

Faecal calprotectin (FC) is the most relevant noninvasive biomarker for monitoring inflammatory status, response to treatment and for predicting clinical relapse in ulcerative colitis (UC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of FC in predicting both clinical/endoscopic activity and clinical relapse in a large UC patient cohort.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A two-phase prospective study was carried out. In the first phase, the relationship between FC and clinical/endoscopic activity was evaluated. In the second phase, a cohort of asymptomatic patients with endoscopic mucosal healing was followed up using clinical and FC level determinations.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-one UC patients were enrolled. The FC concentrations were directly correlated with both clinical and endoscopic activity (r=0.76 and 0.87, respectively, P<0.05) and were capable of differentiating between different degrees of endoscopic severity (P<0.01). An FC cut-off value of 110 μg/g was highly predictive (95%) of endoscopic activity. Seventy-four patients in clinical remission with mucosal healing were followed up for a year or until relapse and 27% developed a clinical relapse. The FC concentration of nonrelapsed patients (48 μg/g) versus relapsed patients (218 μg/g) was significantly different (P<0.01). An FC cut-off value of 193 μg/g had an accuracy of 89% in predicting clinical relapse. High FC levels were associated with clinical relapse using survival analysis and multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Our data strongly support the use of FC for staging the activity of disease, predicting relapse and leading decision-making in a UC setting.

Fecal calprotectin and its correlation with inflammatory markers and endoscopy in patients from India with inflammatory bowel disease

INTRODUCTION

In clinical practice, endoscopic findings are often used for assessing disease activity in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In recent years, blood and stool markers are being increasingly used for this purpose. Among them, the fecal calprotectin (FC) level is probably the most favored. Data on the reliability of FC are lacking from countries like India, where gut infections are common.

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were to compare the FC level with the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and the C-reactive protein (CRP) as non-invasive markers of IBD and, in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), and to study its correlation with disease extent, clinical activity, and endoscopic severity.

METHODS

Records of patients with IBD who had tests for FC, ESR and CRP and colonoscopy done within a 2-week period, between 2012 and 2014, were retrieved. Sixty-three patients (UC 32, Crohn's disease [CD] 31) were included for analysis. ESR, CRP and FC were compared to endoscopy to assess inflammation.

RESULTS

Patients with UC had higher levels of FC than those with ileocolonic CD (median FC 800 mcg/g vs. 619 mcg/g, respectively; p = 0.04). FC levels correlated with CRP (r = 0.4, p < 0.001) but not with ESR (r = 0.21, p = 0.09). In patients with UC with endoscopic evidence of inflammation, more (86.9 %) had FC > 200 mcg/g (cut-off for disease activity in our laboratory) than had ESR >20 mm in the first hour (60.6 %) or positive CRP (65.6 %) (< 0.01); FC levels increased with increasing endoscopic Mayo score (p = 0.001) and Truelove-Witt's clinical severity score (p = 0.006), but did not correlate with disease extent (p = 0.7). The best FC cut-off level to identify 'active UC' (Mayo grade 2 or more) was 800 mcg/g.

CONCLUSION

Fecal calprotectin level correlates with CRP but not with ESR. In patients with UC with inflammation, FC > 200 mcg/g is more often positive than raised ESR or CRP; it also correlates with clinical and endoscopic activity but not with disease extent. FC level > 800 mcg/g can be used to differentiate active from inactive UC.

Are faecal markers good indicators of mucosal healing in inflammatory bowel disease?

AIM: To review the published literature concerning the accuracy of faecal inflammatory markers for identifying mucosal healing.

METHODS: Bibliographical searches were performed in MEDLINE electronic database up to February 2015, using the following terms: “inflammatory bowel disease”, “Crohn´s disease”, “ulcerative colitis”, “faecal markers”, “calprotectin”, “lactoferrin”, “S100A12”, “endoscop*”, “mucosal healing”, “remission”. In addition, relevant references from these studies were also included. Data were extracted from the published papers including odds ratios with 95%CI, P values and correlation coefficients. Data were grouped together according to each faecal marker, Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis, and paediatric compared with adult study populations. Studies included in this review assessed mucosal inflammation by endoscopic and/or histological means and compared these findings to faecal marker concentrations in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) patient cohorts. Articles had to be published between 1990 and February 2015 and written in English. Papers excluded from the review were those where the faecal biomarker concentration was compared between patients with IBD and controls or other disease groups, those where serum biomarkers were used, those with a heterogeneous study population and those only assessing post-operative disease.

RESULTS: The available studies show that faecal markers, such as calprotectin and lactoferrin, are promising non-invasive indicators of mucosal healing. However, due to wide variability in study design, especially with regard to the definition of mucosal healing and evaluation of marker cut offs, the available data do not yet indicate the optimal roles of these markers. Thirty-six studies published between 1990 and 2014 were included. Studies comprised variable numbers of study participants, considered CD (15-164 participants) or UC (12-152 participants) separately or as a combined group (11-252 participants). Eight reports included paediatric patients. Several indices were used to document mucosal inflammation, encompassing eleven endoscopic and eight histologic grading systems. The majority of the available reports focused on faecal calprotectin (33 studies), whilst others assessed faecal lactoferrin (13 studies) and one study assessed S100A12. Across all of the biomarkers, there is a wide range of correlation describing the association between faecal markers and endoscopic disease activity (r values ranging from 0.32 to 0.87, P values ranging from < 0.0001 to 0.7815). Correlation coefficients are described in almost all studies and are used more commonly than outcome measures such as sensitivity, specificity, PPV and/or NPV. Overall, the studies that have evaluated faecal calprotectin and/or faecal lactoferrin and their relationship with endoscopic disease activity show inconsistent results.

CONCLUSION: Future studies should report the results of faecal inflammatory markers in the context of mucosal healing with clear validated cut offs.

FECAL CALPROTECTIN: levels for the ethiological diagnosis in Brazilian patients with gastrointestinal symptoms

BACKGROUND

Determination of fecal calprotectin can provide an important guidance for the physician, also in primary care, in the differential diagnosis of gastrointestinal disorders, meanly between inflammatory bowel diseases and irritable bowel syndrome. Objectives The aims of the present study were to prospectively investigate, in Brazilian adults with gastrointestinal complaints, the value of fecal calprotectin as a biomarker for the differential diagnosis between functional and organic disorders and to correlate the concentrations with the activity of inflammatory bowel diseases.

METHODS

The study included consecutive patients who had gastrointestinal complaints in which the measurement levels of fecal calprotectin were recommended. Fecal calprotectin was measured using a Bühlmann (Basel, Switzerland) ELISA kit.

RESULTS

A total of 279 patients were included in the study, with median age of 39 years (range, 18 to 78 years). After clinical and laboratorial evaluation and considering the final diagnosis, patients were allocated into the following groups: a) Irritable Bowel Syndrome: 154 patients (102 female and 52 male subjects). b) Inflammatory Bowel Diseases group: 112 patients; 73 with Crohn's disease; 38 female and 35 male patients; 52.1% (38/73) presented active disease, and 47.9% (35/73) had disease in remission and 39 patients with ulcerative colitis;19 female and 20 male patients; 48.7% (19/39) classified with active disease and 49.3% (20/39) with disease in remission. A significant difference (P<0.001) was observed between the median value of fecal calprotectin in Irritable Bowel Syndrome group that was 50.5 µg/g (IQR=16 - 294 µg/g); 405 µg/g (IQR=29 - 1980 µg/g) in Crohn's disease patients and 457 µg/g (IQR=25 - 1430 µg/g) in ulcerative colitis patients. No difference was observed between the values found in the patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Levels of fecal calprotectin were significantly lower in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases in remission when compared with active disease (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study showed that the determination of fecal calprotectin assists to differentiate between active and inactive inflammatory bowel diseases and between inflammatory bowel diseases and irritable bowel syndrome.

Clinicians' guide to the use of fecal calprotectin to identify and monitor disease activity in inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Objective monitoring of the severity of inflammation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is an essential part of disease management. However, repeat endoscopy to define extent and severity of inflammation is not practical. Fecal calprotectin (FC) is a biomarker that can be used as a surrogate test to distinguish inflammatory from noninflammatory gastrointestinal disease.

METHODS

A targeted search of the literature regarding FC, focusing primarily on the past three years, was conducted to develop practical clinical guidance on the current utility of FC in the routine management of IBD patients.

RESULTS

It is recommended that samples for FC testing be obtained from the first bowel excretion of the day. FC testing should be used as standard of care to accurately confirm inflammation and 'real-time' disease activity when a clinician suspects an IBD flare. Although FC is a reliable marker of inflammation, its role in routine monitoring in improving long-term outcomes has not yet been fully assessed. Based on available evidence, the authors suggest the following cut-off values and management strategies: when FC levels are <50 µg⁄g to 100 µg⁄g, quiescent disease is likely and therapy should be continued; when FC levels are >100 µg⁄g to 250 µg⁄g, inflammation is possible and further testing (eg, colonoscopy) is required to confirm inflammation; and when FC levels are >250 µg⁄g, active inflammation is likely and strategies to control inflammation should be initiated (eg, optimizing current therapies or switching to an alternative therapy).

DISCUSSION

FC is a useful biomarker to accurately assess the degree of inflammation and should be incorporated into the management of patients with IBD.

Biomarkers of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: From Classical Laboratory Tools to Personalized Medicine

Diagnostics of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) currently relies on a combination of biological and morphological tests. The current method of diagnostic remains a critical challenge for physicians in part due to their invasiveness and also for their limitations in term of diagnosis, prognosis, disease activity and severity assessment, and therapeutic outcomes. Laboratory biomarkers can be used in the diagnosis and management of IBD, but none of them has been proven to be ideal. Increasing efforts are being made to discover new biomarkers that can discriminate between the types of IBD, predict future responses to treatment, and aid in differential diagnosis, treatment planning, and prognosis prediction. This review addresses the potential for current biomarkers and the emergence of the concept of biomarker signatures in IBD diagnostic and personalized medicine.

The marker C-reactive protein is helpful in monitoring the integrity of anastomosis: plasma calprotectin

BACKGROUND

Despite improved surgical techniques and materials, anastomotic leakage is a big problem for surgeons. The most frequently used laboratory parameters is leukocyte (white blood cell) and C-reactive protein (CRP). Availability of plasma calprotectin with CRP to detect anastomotic leakage was studied.

METHODS

In this prospective study of 41 (male/female 18/23) patients in the anastomosis group, 30 (male/female 20/10) patients were included in the control group. The anastomosis groups viewed in preoperatively day and postoperatively 1st, 3rd, and 5th day of CRP, white blood cell, and plasma calprotectin values.

RESULTS

Anastomosis group with complications and without complications were studied. Statistically significant similarities between plasma calprotectin and CRP levels in the postoperative period were observed.

CONCLUSION

Plasma calprotectin in monitoring the integrity of the anastomosis can be used with a marker CRP.

C-Reactive Protein, Fecal Calprotectin, and Stool Lactoferrin for Detection of Endoscopic Activity in Symptomatic Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

Persistent disease activity is associated with a poor prognosis in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Therefore, monitoring of patients with intent to suppress subclinical inflammation has emerged as a treatment concept. As endoscopic monitoring is invasive and resource intensive, identification of valid markers of disease activity is a priority. The objective was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of C-reactive protein (CRP), fecal calprotectin (FC), and stool lactoferrin (SL) for assessment of endoscopically defined disease activity in IBD.

METHODS

Databases were searched from inception to November 6, 2014 for relevant cohort and case-control studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of CRP, FC, or SL and used endoscopy as a gold standard in patients with symptoms consistent with active IBD. Sensitivities and specificities were pooled to generate operating property estimates for each test using a bivariate diagnostic meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies (n=2499 patients) were eligible. The pooled sensitivity and specificity estimates for CRP, FC, and SL were 0.49 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.34-0.64) and 0.92 (95% CI 0.72-0.96), 0.88 (95% CI 0.84-0.90) and 0.73 (95% CI 0.66-0.79), and 0.82 (95% CI 0.73-0.88) and 0.79 (95% CI 0.62-0.89), respectively. FC was more sensitive than CRP in both diseases and was more sensitive in ulcerative colitis than Crohn's disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Although CRP, FC, and SL are useful biomarkers, their value in managing individual patients must be considered in specific clinical contexts.

Accuracy of Rapid Fecal Calprotectin Test in Monitoring Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Under Treatment with TNFα Antagonists

BACKGROUND

Anti-TNFα antibodies are effective in treating inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) unresponsive to the standard treatments. Information about the role of rapid fecal calprotectin (FC) in monitoring ambulatory IBD patients under treatment with anti-TNFα is lacking. Our aim was to assess the accuracy of rapid FC in monitoring those patients.

METHODS

Seventy-two patients (38 males, 34 females, mean age 42.5 years, range 23-57 years), affected by ulcerative colitis (UC) (20 patients) or by Crohn's disease (CD) (52 patients) were treated with anti-TNFα antibodies. FC was assessed by a rapid semiquantitative test.

RESULTS

With respect to the absence of clinical remission, FC test showed sensitivity of 71.8 %, specificity of 65.2 %, PPV of 41.8 %, and NPV of 86.9 %. In UC patients, FC test showed a sensitivity of 66.7 %, a specificity of 56.1 %, a PPV of 18.2 %, and a NPV of 92.0 %. In CD patients, FC test showed sensitivity of 70.6 %, specificity of 65.2 %, PPV of 50.0 %, and NPV of 81.8 %. With respect to the presence of endoscopic lesions, FC test showed sensitivity of 73.5 %, specificity of 96.0 %, PPV of 96.2 %, and NPV of 72.7 %. In UC patients, FC test showed sensitivity of 47.2 %, specificity of 84.6 %, PPV of 89.5 %, and NPV of 36.7 %. In CD patients, FC test showed sensitivity of 90.1 %, specificity of 79.7 %, PPV of 71.9 %, and NPV of 93.3 %.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnostic accuracy of rapid FC seems better in predicting persistence of endoscopic lesions than clinical remission in IBD patients under treatment with anti-TNFα.

Biomarkers as potential treatment targets in inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review

There is increasing interest in the concept of 'treat-to-target' in inflammatory bowel disease as a mechanism to standardize management and prevent complications. While clinical, radiographic and endoscopic treatment end points will figure prominently in this promising management paradigm, the role that noninvasive biomarkers will play is currently undefined. The goal of the present systematic review was to investigate the potential value of biomarkers as treatment targets in inflammatory bowel disease, with particular focus on those best studied: serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and fecal calprotectin. In Crohn disease, elevated CRP levels at baseline predict response to anti-tumour necrosis factor agents, and normalization is usually associated with clinical and endoscopic remission. CRP and hemoglobin levels can be used to help predict clinical relapse in the context of withdrawal of therapy. Ultimately, the authors conclude that currently available biomarkers should not be used as treatment targets in inflammatory bowel disease because they have inadequate operational characteristics to make them safe surrogates for clinical, endoscopic and radiographic evaluation. However, CRP and fecal calprotectin are important adjunctive measures that help alert the clinician to pursue further investigation.

Validation of a new extraction device for measuring faecal calprotectin in inflammatory bowel disease, and comparison to established extraction methods

OBJECTIVE

Faecal (f-) calprotectin is a widely used surrogate marker of intestinal inflammation. F-calprotectin analysis is labour demanding partly due to a time consuming extraction step. The aim of this project was to validate a new extraction method for f-calprotectin.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective multicentre study included 135 patients with an established diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease. The patients submitted a faeces sample, which was extracted with both the conventional method at the participating laboratory and the new extraction device. The extracts were analyzed by an automated ELISA instrument.

RESULTS

Method comparison of the traditional method and the new device showed a slope of 1.01 (0.93-1.07) with intercept of - 2.2 (- 4.9-0.6). The Spearman rank correlation coefficient was 0.96.

CONCLUSIONS

The new extraction device is a reliable and time saving alternative to the conventional extraction method.

Fecal calprotectin use in inflammatory bowel disease and beyond: A mini-review

Given the number of inflammatory disorders affecting the gastrointestinal tract directly and indirectly, coupled with the considerable overlap with functional disorders, it is evident that more useful noninvasive diagnostic tests are required to aid with diagnosis. If these tests can also have some utility for individual patient follow-up in terms of disease activity and response to treatment, as well as providing forewarning of disease relapse, it would be extremely useful information for the clinician. One recently described test that may fulfill several of these attributes is based on leakage of a mononuclear cell cytoplasmic protein, calprotectin, along the intestinal tract, which can then be quantified in feces. This has been used to distinguish patients exhibiting symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome from patients with inflammatory bowel disease, with a measure of success greater than with currently used techniques. The present article summarizes the experience with this test used in inflammatory bowel disease, as well as a variety of gastrointestinal disorders.

VAlidation of an 8-item-questionnaire predictive for a positive caLprotectin tEst and Real-life implemenTation in primary care to reduce diagnostic delay in inflammatory bowel disease (ALERT): protocol for a prospective diagnostic study

INTRODUCTION

Diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in primary healthcare is challenging and often associated with a considerable diagnostic delay. This delay is associated with worse disease progression and outcomes. Although testing for faecal calprotectin is a useful screening tool to identify patients who need endoscopy for IBD, the widespread use may not be appropriate due to the low prevalence of patients with IBD among all patients attending a general practitioner (GP) with gastrointestinal symptoms. To increase the appropriate application of the faecal calprotectin test, an 8-item questionnaire, the CalproQuest, has been developed to increase pretest probability for a positive test result.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a prospective diagnostic trial. The study consists of two independent and consecutive parts A and B, conducted by gastroenterologists (A) and GPs (B), respectively. Patients included in part A are referred to the gastroenterologist for any endoscopic evaluation. Patients included in part B present at their GP because of ongoing unspecific gastrointestinal symptoms (abdominal pain, bloating, stool irregularities, diarrhoea) for at least 2 weeks. CalproQuest consists of four main and four secondary questions specific for IBD; it is considered positive if ≥2 main criteria are answered positively or one main criterion and two secondary criteria are answered positively. In part A, the sensitivity and specificity of CalproQuest for stool calprotectin levels ≥50 μg/g faeces and for positive IBD diagnosis will be investigated. In part B, the feasibility of CalproQuest in daily primary healthcare practice will be assessed.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Kanton Zurich (reference KEK-ZH-number 2013-0516). The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and shared with the worldwide medical community.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN66310845.

Fecal calprotectin concentrations in healthy children aged 1-18 months

Objective

Fecal calprotectin (FC) is an established biomarker of gut inflammation. The aim of this study was to evaluate FC concentrations in healthy children between 1 and 18 months of age.

Methods

Healthy children aged 1-18 months were enrolled in this study at the Department of Children's Health Care in Shanghai, China. Children’s stool samples were collected and analyzed, and FC concentration was determined using a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The children's weights and lengths were measured. Parents were asked to complete a brief questionnaire regarding several clinical and sociodemographic factors.

Results

The FC concentrations were unevenly distributed; the median FC concentration was 174.3 μg/g (range: 6.0-1097.7 μg/g) or 2.241 log10 μg/g (range: 0.775-3.041 log10 μg/g) for all 288 children. The children were divided into several age groups: 1-3 months, 3-6 months, 6-9 months, 9-12 months and 12-18 months. The median FC concentrations for these age groups were 375.2 μg/g (2.574 log10 μg/g), 217.9 μg/g (2.338 log10 μg/g), 127.7 μg/g (2.106 log10 μg/g), 96.1 μg/g (1.983 log10 μg/g) and 104.2 μg/g (2.016 log10 μg/g), respectively. A significant correlation between age and FC concentration was found (r=-0.490, p<0.001). A simple correlation analysis of weight-for-length Z-scores or weight-for-age Z-scores vs. FC concentrations showed that these variables were negatively correlated (Spearman’s rho=-0.287, p<0.001; Spearman’s rho=-0.243, p<0.001, respectively).

Conclusions

The FC levels of children aged 1-18 months exhibit a downward trend with increasing age and are greater than the normal levels observed in healthy adults. In healthy children aged <6 months, FC levels are high. In children aged 6-18 months, FC concentrations are relatively low but are still higher than those of children aged >4 years.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and exacerbations of inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the most commonly prescribed analgesics for treatment of variety of pain and inflammatory conditions. Their effects on the gastrointestinal tract are well described, but their possible propensity to cause clinical relapse in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains somewhat unclear.

AIM

We reviewed case reports, case-control and cohort studies, as well as clinical trials of NSAIDs in patients with quiescent IBD in order to better assess the magnitude and type of effect.

RESULTS

The published literature on this subject is of mixed quality and many of the studies are open to criticism. The majority of patients with IBD tolerate these medications, while in the sole clinical trial of NSAIDs 20% experienced a clinical and laboratory documented relapse of disease, within 7-10 days of NSAID ingestion. The data on cyclooxygenase (COX)-2-selective anti-inflammatory analgesic are somewhat unclear, but nimesulide, celecoxib and etoricoxib do not appear to be associated with relapse of disease.

CONCLUSION

Conventional NSAIDs may cause clinical relapse in about 20% of patients with quiescent IBD, which may be due to dual inhibition of the COX enzymes. Certain COX-2-selective NSAIDs appear to be safe.

Faecal matrix metalloprotease-9 is a more sensitive marker for diagnosing pouchitis than faecal calprotectin: results from a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Potential non-invasive markers of pouchitis would have a great deal of significance within clinical practice.

AIM

This study is aimed at assessing the diagnostic accuracy of fecal calprotectin and matrix metalloprotease-9 as potential markers in patients both with and without pouchitis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Stool and blood samples were collected from 33 ileal pouch-anal anastomosis patients before a follow-up pouchoscopy. Biopsy samples were taken for histological purposes. The presence of cuffitis and stenosis was evaluated with an endoscopy. Calprotectin and matrix metalloprotease-9 were quantified with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

Pouchitis was detected in 30.3% of the patients. The levels of fecal calprotectin and matrix metalloprotease-9 increased significantly in patients with pouchitis. The sensitivity and specificity of matrix metalloprotease-9 was higher than that of fecal calprotectin. Only matrix metalloprotease-9 correlated significantly with the severity of pouchitis.

DISCUSSION

Fecal matrix metalloprotease-9 has a high specificity in the diagnosis of pouchitis.

Moderate to severe and prolonged left lower-abdominal pain is the best symptom characterizing symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease of the colon: a comparison with fecal calprotectin in clinical setting

BACKGROUND

Left lower-abdominal pain is considered the best symptom to differentiate between symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease (SUDD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). However, this statement has not been validated yet.

GOALS

The aim of this study was to assess whether prolonged left lower-quadrant pain is the best symptom characterizing SUDD and be able to differentiate SUDD from IBS-like symptoms in diverticulosis, and to compare the location of abdominal pain with fecal calprotectin (FC) expression.

STUDY

Seventy-two patients suffering from abdominal pain and having diverticula at colonoscopy were enrolled. Patients were classified according to SUDD definition (abdominal pain for at least 24 consecutive hours in left lower abdomen) (42 patients) and IBS-like symptoms fulfilling Rome III criteria (30 patients). Abdominal pain was assessed using a 10-point visual scale, assigning numerical values from 0 (absence of pain) to 10 (severe pain). FC expression was assessed by a rapid test in all patients enrolled.

RESULTS

FC test was positive in 27 (64.3%) patients in the SUDD group and in no patient in the IBS-like group (P<0.0001). In patients with SUDD, there was a significant correlation between the severity of the abdominal pain and the FC score (P=0.0015). Extension of diverticulosis correlated with FC score (P=0.022) and the severity of diverticulosis (P=0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Severe and prolonged left lower-abdominal pain seems to be the best symptom characterizing SUDD, and it can differentiate these patients from those harboring diverticula but suffering from IBS-like according to Rome III criteria.

Pediatric urology patients with megaureter may have a risk of contracting Crohn disease

Crohn disease (CD) may develop at any age, but is most typically diagnosed in late adolescence and early adulthood. To the best of our knowledge, there are no reports showing that congenital urological abnormalities may be associated to CD. We describe 5 pediatric patients who had ureteral/urethral abnormalities in their infancy and developed CD during subsequent years. The occurrence of CD in these patients constitutes a novel potential association.

Fecal calprotectin in diagnosis and clinical assessment of inflammatory bowel disease

The fecal neutrophil-derived biomarker calprotectin has several features of an ideal noninvasive test for detecting intestinal inflammation: it is simple, reliable, and low in cost. Its utility in differentiating inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) from functional conditions such as irritable bowel syndrome is well documented. Fecal calprotectin (FC) correlates closely with endoscopic activity of IBD. Emerging evidence suggest its usefulness in serial monitoring of disease activity and of therapy success in IBD. A low FC concentration predicts persistence of clinical remission especially in non-symptomatic ulcerative colitis and Crohn's colitis. Here, an overview is given to the current role of FC in diagnosis and clinical assessment of IBD.

Faecal calprotectin for differentiating between irritable bowel syndrome and inflammatory bowel disease: a useful screen in daily gastroenterology practice

OBJECTIVE

To determine the best faecal calprotectin (FCP) cut-off level for differentiating between irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and organic disease, particularly inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), in patients presenting with chronic diarrhoea.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of patients who had colonoscopy, histology and FCP completed within 2 months.

SETTING

District general hospital.

PATIENTS

Consecutive new patients with chronic diarrhoea lasting longer than 4 weeks.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were seen by a single experienced gastroenterologist and listed for colonoscopy with histology. Laboratory investigations included a single faecal specimen for calprotectin assay (lower limit of detection: 8 µg/g), the results used for information only.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Six FCP cut-off levels (range 8-150 µg/g) were compared against the 'gold standard' of histology: inflammation 'present' or 'absent'.

RESULTS

Of 119 patients studied, 98 had normal colonoscopy and histology. The sensitivity of FCP to detect IBD at cut-off levels 8, 25 and 50 µg/g was 100% (with corresponding specificity 51%, 51%, 60%). In contrast, the lowest FCP cut-off, 8 µg/g, had 100% sensitivity to detect colonic inflammation, irrespective of cause (with negative predictive value (NPV) 100%). Importantly, 50/119 patients (42%) with FCP <8 µg/g had normal colonoscopy and histology.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that using FCP to screen patients newly referred for chronic diarrhoea could exclude all without IBD and, at a lower cut-off, all without colonic inflammation, thus avoiding the need for colonoscopy. Such a major reduction has implications for resource allocation.

The role and utility of faecal markers in inflammatory bowel disease

Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis are characterized by periods of symptomatic relapse and remission. Diagnosis and assessment of inflammatory bowel disease has so far been based on clinical evaluation, serum parameters, radiology and endoscopy. Faecal markers such as calprotectin or lactoferrin have emerged as new diagnostic tools to detect and monitor intestinal inflammation. This review focuses on their potential clinical applications and limitations in the management of inflammatory bowel disease.

Does fecal calprotectin predict short-term relapse after stopping TNFα-blocking agents in inflammatory bowel disease patients in deep remission?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

This prospective multicenter study examined whether elevated fecal calprotec tin (FC) concentrations after stopping TNFα-blocking therapy can predict clinical or endoscopic relapse. In addition, we evaluated the impact of histological remission on the relapse risk.

METHODS

We enrolled inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients who were in clinical, endoscopic, and FC-based (< 100 μg/g) remission after a minimum 11 months of TNFα-blocking therapy. The patients were followed-up for 12 months after the discontinuation of TNFα-blocking therapy. FC was collected monthly for the first 6 months and thereafter every second month. Ileocolonoscopy was performed at inclusion, at 4 months, at the study end, and at the time of clinical relapse.

RESULTS

Of 52 enrolled patients, 49 (16 Crohn's disease, 33 ulcerative colitis/IBD unclassified) provided the stool samples requested and comprised the study group. During the follow-up, 15/49 (31%) relapsed, whereas 34 (69%) remained in remission. Patients relapsing showed constantly elevated FC levels for a median of 94 (13-317) days before the relapse. Significant increase in median FC levels was seen 2 (p = 0.0014), 4 (p = 0.0056), and 6 (p = 0.0029) months before endoscopic relapse. Constantly normal FC concentrations during the follow-up were highly predictive for clinical and endoscopic remission. Normal FC concentrations in patients with remission were associated with histological remission.

CONCLUSION

FC seems to increase and remain elevated before clinical or endoscopic relapse, suggesting that it can be used as a surrogate marker for predicting and identifying patients requiring close follow-up in clinical practice.

The intra-individual variability of faecal calprotectin: a prospective study in patients with active ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Leukocyte-derived proteins in faeces, especially calprotectin, are increasingly used to assess disease activity in ulcerative colitis. The objectives of the present study were to assess the importance of factors related to the stool sampling procedure.

METHODS

For 2 days, patients with active ulcerative colitis collected two stool samples at each bowel movement. The time of defecation, consistency and presence of blood were self-recorded in a diary. The variability in the concentrations of calprotectin during the day and between two consecutive days was assessed, as was the stability of calprotectin concentrations in samples stored at room temperature.

RESULTS

Altogether, 18 patients collected 287 stool samples. The intraclass correlation coefficient in pairs of samples from 132 bowel movements was 0.79 (95% CI 0.48-0.90). The median individual coefficient of variation in samples collected during the same day was 52% (4-178). There was a correlation between the level of calprotectin and the time between bowel movements (r = 0.5; p = 0.013). After 3 days at room temperature the calprotectin concentrations in stool samples were unchanged, but after 7 days a significant (p < 0.01) decrease was found (mean 28%; 95% CI 0.10-0.47).

CONCLUSION

The present data reveal a great variability in the concentrations of calprotectin in stool samples collected during a single day. Since the levels of calprotectin increased with longer time between the bowel movements, it seems most appropriate to analyse stool from the first bowel movement in the morning. Moreover, storage of stool samples at room temperature for more than 3 days is not advisable.

Accuracy of Rapid Fecal Calprotectin Test in Monitoring Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Under Treatment with TNFα Antagonists

BACKGROUND

Anti-TNFα antibodies are effective in treating inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) unresponsive to the standard treatments. Information about the role of rapid fecal calprotectin (FC) in monitoring ambulatory IBD patients under treatment with anti-TNFα is lacking. Our aim was to assess the accuracy of rapid FC in monitoring those patients.

METHODS

Seventy-two patients (38 males, 34 females, mean age 42.5 years, range 23-57 years), affected by ulcerative colitis (UC) (20 patients) or by Crohn's disease (CD) (52 patients) were treated with anti-TNFα antibodies. FC was assessed by a rapid semiquantitative test.

RESULTS

With respect to the absence of clinical remission, FC test showed sensitivity of 71.8 %, specificity of 65.2 %, PPV of 41.8 %, and NPV of 86.9 %. In UC patients, FC test showed a sensitivity of 66.7 %, a specificity of 56.1 %, a PPV of 18.2 %, and a NPV of 92.0 %. In CD patients, FC test showed sensitivity of 70.6 %, specificity of 65.2 %, PPV of 50.0 %, and NPV of 81.8 %. With respect to the presence of endoscopic lesions, FC test showed sensitivity of 73.5 %, specificity of 96.0 %, PPV of 96.2 %, and NPV of 72.7 %. In UC patients, FC test showed sensitivity of 47.2 %, specificity of 84.6 %, PPV of 89.5 %, and NPV of 36.7 %. In CD patients, FC test showed sensitivity of 90.1 %, specificity of 79.7 %, PPV of 71.9 %, and NPV of 93.3 %.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnostic accuracy of rapid FC seems better in predicting persistence of endoscopic lesions than clinical remission in IBD patients under treatment with anti-TNFα.

Fecal level of calprotectin identifies histologic inflammation in patients with ulcerative colitis in clinical and endoscopic remission

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Histologic recovery of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) often is incomplete, even among those in clinical and endoscopic remission. Persistent active microscopic inflammation is associated with an increased risk of relapse and colorectal neoplasia. A high level of fecal calprotectin (FC) is a reliable marker of endoscopic lesions in patients with UC. We evaluated the accuracy of FC in identifying patients with UC in clinical and endoscopic remission who still have histologic features of inflammation.

METHODS

We performed a prospective observational study of 59 patients with UC in clinical and endoscopic remission undergoing colonoscopy. Several biopsy specimens were collected from each colonic segment. Endoscopic remission was defined as a Mayo endoscopic subscore with a grade of 0 or 1. Active histologic inflammation was defined by the presence of neutrophils infiltrating crypt epithelial cells. FC was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay analysis.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients (30.5%) showed evidence of active histologic inflammation. Patients with active histologic inflammation had a significantly higher median level of FC (278 μg/g; interquartile range, 136-696 μg/g) than those without active histologic inflammation (68 μg/g; interquartile range, 30-172 μg/g) (P = .002). In multivariate analysis, the FC and Mayo endoscopic subscore (0 or 1) were each independent predictors of histologic inflammation. The level of FC identified active histologic inflammation in patients in clinical and endoscopic remission, with an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve value of 0.754.

CONCLUSIONS

Histologic inflammation is common among patients with UC in clinical and endoscopic remission. Patients with histologic features of inflammation can be identified reliably based on their fecal level of calprotectin.