Luminex(®) and its applications for solid organ transplantation, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and transfusion

Performance of LIFECODES HLA-DQB1 typing kit using Luminex platform in Koreans

Intermediate-resolution HLA-DQ typing has gained importance in organ transplantation recently. We evaluated the performance of the LIFECODES HLA-DQB1 typing kit (Immucor, USA) using sequence-specific oligonucleotide (SSO) probe and Luminex platform (Luminex Corp., USA) on 100 samples tested by sequence-based typing (SBT) using the AlleleSEQR HLA-DQB1 kit (Abbott Molecular, USA) in Korean individuals. No sample showed ambiguity in the assignment of 4-digit HLA-DQB1 allele with the LIFECODES HLA-DQB1 SSO typing kit, and the results were fully concordant with those of high-resolution typing of AlleleSEQR HLA-DQB1 SBT up to 4-digit level. Three samples required adjustment of false reactions (3/100, 3.0%): two samples with DQB1(*)03:03/(*)06:01 showed false-positive result in probe 253, and 1 sample with DQB1(*)04:02/(*)05:02 showed false-negative result in probe 217. We tested an additional sample with DQB1(*)03:03/(*)06:01, which showed same false-positivity in probe 253 and 2 samples with DQB1(*)04:02/(*)05:02, which showed no false reaction. The false reactions did not result in ambiguity or change in the HLA allele assignment. We could assign HLA-DQB1 alleles to 4 digit-level without ambiguity, with 100% concordance with the SBT results. Thus, LIFECODES HLA-DQB1 SSO typing kit showed good performance for intermediate-resolution HLA-DQB1 typing in clinical laboratory for organ transplantation in Koreans.

Concordance and discordance in anti-HLA antibody testing

BACKGROUND

Correct identification of the specificity of antibodies directed against HLA using single antigen Luminex beads (SALB) is essential in current HLA laboratory practice for transplantation. The aim of this study was to investigate the magnitude of concordance and discordance among laboratories in testing for anti-HLA antibodies using SALB.

METHOD

35 sera were distributed by the ASHI Proficiency Testing Program to HLA laboratories worldwide. We analyzed 4335 test results submitted between April 2010 and April 2013 by participating laboratories.

RESULTS

SALB was used by approximately 94% of the participating laboratories, yet concordant assignment of antibody specificity was imperfect. For each serum, the assignment of an average of 10 antibody specificities was discordant. Disagreement was observed for antibodies directed against common as well as uncommon antigens. The assignment of an average of 15 antibody specificities in each "positive" serum appeared to be influenced by vendor-dependent causes. Inter-vendor concordance was lower than intra-vendor concordance, indicating that vendor dependent factors may be a central cause for disagreement.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study illustrates the prevalence of concordance and discordance, also affected by unpremeditated causes, in reporting SALB antibody results. Insufficient concordance and standardization in antibody testing may have practical implications for organ allocation and organ sharing programs.

Preemptive treatment with therapeutic plasma exchange and rituximab for early donor-specific antibodies after lung transplantation

OBJECTIVE

De novo donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies develop in a high proportion of lung transplant recipients early after lung transplantation. We recently showed that de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSA) occurrence is associated with significantly increased mortality. Here, we studied the efficacy of a preemptive treatment protocol.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study was conducted on all lung transplantations at Hanover Medical School between January 2009 and May 2013.

RESULTS

Among the 500 transplant recipients, early DSA developed in 86 (17%). Of these, 56 patients (65%; Group A) received therapeutic plasma exchange, and 30 patients (35%; Group B) did not. Among Group A patients, 51 also received rituximab. Between groups, there was no statistically significant difference in mortality, incidence of pulsed steroid therapies, rejections diagnosed by biopsy specimen, incidence of bronchitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), or infections requiring hospitalization at 1 year and 3 years. Also, there were no statistically significant differences after matching 21 Group A with 21 Group B patients through propensity score analysis. Significantly more Group A patients (65%) than Group B patients (34%) cleared DSA at hospital discharge (p = 0.01). At the last control after transplantation (median, 14 months; interquartile range, 5-24 months), 11 Group A (22%) and 9 Group B patients (33%) still showed DSA (p = 0.28).

CONCLUSIONS

Preemptive treatment with therapeutic plasma exchange and rituximab led to improved elimination of DSA early after lung transplantation (p = 0.01). However, spontaneous elimination in untreated Group B patients also occurred frequently. This treatment protocol was not associated with significantly improved outcome.

Early donor-specific antibodies in lung transplantation: risk factors and impact on survival

BACKGROUND

The impact of early donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) on patient and graft survival after lung transplantation remains controversial. In this study we analyzed risk factors for DSA that developed before initial hospital discharge after lung transplantation (early DSA) and compared mid-term outcomes in patients with or without DSA.

METHODS

Between January 2009 and August 2013, 546 patients underwent lung transplantation at our institution. One hundred (18%) patients developed early DSA (Group A) and 446 (82%) patients (Group B) did not. Patient records were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Retransplantation (odds ratio [OR] = 2.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1 to 6.5, p = 0.03), pre-operative HLA antibodies (OR = 2.1, 95% CI 1.2 to 3.4, p = 0.003) and primary graft dysfunction (PGD) score Grade 2 or 3 at 48 hours (OR = 2.6, 95% CI 1.5 to 4.6, p = 0.001) were associated with early DSA development. Overall, 1- and 3-year survival in Group A and B patients was 79 ± 4% vs 88 ± 2% and 57 ± 8% vs 74 ± 3%, respectively (p = 0.019). Eleven Group A (11%) and 32 Group B (7%) patients died before hospital discharge (p = 0.34). Among patients surviving beyond discharge, 1- and 3-year survival in Group A and B patients was 89 ± 4% vs 95 ± 1% and 65 ± 8% vs 80 ± 3% in Group A and B patients, respectively (p = 0.04). Multivariate analysis identified early anti-HLA Class II DSA (OR = 1.9, 95% CI 1.0 to 3.4, p = 0.04) as an independent risk factor for post-discharge mortality but not for in-hospital mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-operative HLA antibodies, retransplantation or post-operative PGD increase the risk of developing early DSA, which were independently associated with an increased risk for mortality.