Undertreatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration after 10 Years of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy in the Real World: The Need for A Change of Mindset

To investigate treat and extend versus pro re nata regimen in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: results from the IDEM study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to report the 24-month outcomes of a pro re nata (PRN) compared with a treat and extend (T&E) regimen in patients previously treated for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

METHODS

This was a 2-year prospective, single-center study. Previously treated patients for nAMD were randomized into two regimen groups: T&E and PRN groups. Main outcome measured was change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline to month 24. Secondary outcomes encompassed anatomical features such as central retinal thickness (CRT), number of intravitreal injections (IVI), and visits required.

RESULTS

A total of 124 eyes received the T&E (n = 61) or PRN (n = 63) regimen. At month 24, the mean BCVA change was -4.4 early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) letters (T&E) and -3.4 ETDRS letters (PRN), with a difference of +1.1 ETDRS letters (95% CI [-2.25]; p = 0.006). The mean change in CRT was -10.6 µm (T&E) and -7.9 µm (PRN), with a difference of +2.6 µm (95% CI [+19.2]; p = 0.004). The T&E group had received a mean of +4.6 more injections (95% CI [-7.06; -2.12]; p < 0.001) at month 24.

CONCLUSION

There was statistically proven non-inferiority between the PRN and T&E regimens in terms of visual and anatomical outcomes at 24 months, with significantly more IVI administered in the T&E regimen.

Antivascular endothelial growth factor agents for wet age-related macular degeneration: an IRIS registry analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate treatment patterns and outcomes of patients in the United States who received antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents for wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

DESIGN

Retrospective study PARTICIPANTS: Patients with wet AMD.

METHODS

Using the Intelligent Research in Sight Registry, we studied patients with wet AMD who received ≥1 anti-VEGF injection, who were ≥50 years old, and with ≥1.5 years of follow-up. Patients were grouped based on follow-up duration (in years): ≥1.5 (cohort 1), ≥2.5 (cohort 2), and ≥3.5 (cohort 3).

RESULTS

Patient characteristics were similar between treatment groups. 36.8%, 34.5%, and 39.2% of ranibizumab, aflibercept, and all anti-VEGF eyes, respectively, had an injection interval <8 weeks in length at the end of year 1. Results were similar at year 2 and 3. In cohorts 1-3, visual acuity (VA) changes from baseline ranged from 0.3 to 0.7 (year 1), -1.3 to -1.7 (year 2), and -2.8 to -3.1 (year 3) Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters. By the end of year 3, 41%, 39%, and 42% of ranibizumab, aflibercept, and all anti-VEGF eyes, respectively, had discontinued treatment (no injection for >6 months).

CONCLUSION

Approximately one-third of eyes had injection intervals <8 weeks in length at the end of year 1. VA was slightly better at the end of year 1 and declined after the first year despite treatment. By the end of year 3, more than one-third of eyes had discontinued treatment. Given the high treatment burden, wet AMD patients may benefit from more durable approaches that require less frequent dosing.

Three-Year Outcomes of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Eyes That Do Not Develop Macular Atrophy or Subretinal Fibrosis

Purpose

To report the 36-month treatment outcomes of eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) receiving vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors in daily practice who did not develop either subretinal fibrosis (SRFi) or macular atrophy (MA).

Methods

This is a retrospective analysis of data from the Fight Retinal Blindness registry. Treatment-naïve eyes starting intravitreal injection of VEGF inhibitors for nAMD from January 1, 2010, to September 1, 2017, and did not have SRFI and MA at baseline were tracked.

Results

We identified 2478 eligible eyes, of which 1712 eyes did not develop SRFi or MA, 291 developed extrafoveal SRFI or MA, and 475 developed subfoveal SRFi or MA over 36 months. The estimated visual acuity stabilized from 6 months to 36 months in eyes that did not develop SRFI or MA with a mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) change in VA of −1 (−2, 0) letters, whereas eyes that developed extrafoveal (−3 [−5, −2] letters) or subfoveal (−10 [−11, −8] letters) SRFi or MA declined in vision in the same period. Eyes with no or extrafoveal SRFi or MA over 36 months were more likely to maintain their visual improvement from six months to 36 months (odds ratio [OR; 95% CI] = 2.3 [1.5, 3.3] for absence vs. subfoveal SRFi or MA, P ≤ 0.01 and OR = 2.0 [1.2, 3.4] for extrafoveal vs. subfoveal MA or SRFi, P = 0.01).

Conclusions

Treatment-naïve nAMD eyes receiving VEGF inhibitors maintain their initial six-month visual improvement over three years if they do not develop SRFI or MA.

Translational Relevance

The nAMD is still a major cause of blindness despite antiangiogenic treatments. We found that eyes that did not develop subretinal fibrosis or macular atrophy maintained their initial vision improvement for at least three years, suggesting that identifying treatments for these complications is the final barrier to achieving excellent outcomes in nAMD.

Pipeline therapies for neovascular age related macular degeneration

Age related macular degeneration (AMD) is the most common cause of vision loss in the elderly population. Neovascular AMD comprises 10% of all cases and can lead to devastating visual loss due to choroidal neovascularization (CNV). There are various cytokine pathways involved in the formation and leakage from CNV. Prior treatments have included focal laser therapy, verteporfin (Visudyne, Bausch and Lomb, Rochester, New York) ocular photodynamic therapy, transpupillary thermotherapy, intravitreal steroids and surgical excision of choroidal neovascular membranes. Currently, the major therapies in AMD focus on the VEGF-A pathway, of which the most common are bevacizumab (Avastin; Genentech, San Francisco, California), ranibizumab (Lucentis; Genentech, South San Francisco, California), and aflibercept (Eylea; Regeneron, Tarrytown, New York). Anti-VEGF agents have revolutionized our treatment of wet AMD; however, real world studies have shown limited visual improvement in patients over time, largely due to the large treatment burden. Cheaper alternatives, including ranibizumab biosimilars, include razumab (Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Ahmedabad, India), FYB 201 (Formycon AG, Munich, Germany and Bioeq Gmbh Holzkirchen, Germany), SB-11 (Samsung Bioepsis, Incheon, South Korea), xlucane (Xbrane Biopharma, Solna, Sweden), PF582 (Pfnex, San Diego, California), CHS3551 (Coherus BioSciences, Redwood City, California). Additionally, aflibercept biosimilars under development include FYB203 (Formycon AG, Munich, Germany and Bioeq Gmbh Holzkirchen, Germany), ALT-L9 (Alteogen, Deajeon, South Korea), MYL1710 (Momenta Pharamaceuticals, Cambridge, MA, and Mylan Pharmacueticals, Canonsburg, PA), CHS-2020 (Coherus BioSciences, Redwood City, California). Those in the pipeline of VEGF targets include abicipar pegol (Abicipar; Allergan, Coolock, Dublin), OPT-302 (Opthea; OPTHEA limited; Victoria, Melbourne), conbercept (Lumitin; Chengdu Kanghong Pharmaceutical Group, Chengdu, Sichuan), and KSI-301 (Kodiak Sciences, Palo Alto, CA). There are also combination medications, which target VEGF and PDGF, VEGF and tissue factor, VEGF and Tie-2, which this paper will also discuss in depth. Furthermore, long lasting depots, such as the ranibizumab port delivery system (PDS) (Genentech, San Francisco, CA), as well as others are under evaluation. Gene therapy present possible longer treatments options as well and are reviewed here. This paper will highlight the past approved medications as well as pipeline therapies for neovascular AMD.

Effectiveness of anti-vascular endothelial growth factors in neovascular age-related macular degeneration and variables associated with visual acuity outcomes: Results from the EAGLE study

Objective

To assess the overall effectiveness of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy in treatment-naïve patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in a clinical practice setting.

Study design

EAGLE was a retrospective, 2-year, cohort observational, multicenter study conducted in Italy that analyzed secondary data of treatment-naïve patients with nAMD. The primary endpoint evaluated the mean annualized number of anti-VEGF injections at Years 1 and 2. The main secondary endpoints analyzed the mean change in visual acuity (VA) from baseline and variables associated with visual outcomes at Years 1 and 2.

Results

Of the 752 patients enrolled, 745 (99.07%) received the first dose of anti-VEGF in 2016. Overall, 429 (57.05%) and 335 (44.5%) patients completed the 1- and 2-year follow-ups, respectively. At baseline, mean (standard deviation, SD) age was 75.6 (8.8) years and the mean (SD) VA was 53.43 (22.8) letters. The mean (SD) number of injections performed over the 2 years was 8.2 (4.1) resulting in a mean (SD) change in VA of 2.45 (19.36) (P = 0.0005) letters at Year 1 and −1.34 (20.85) (P = 0.3984) letters at Year 2. Linear regression models showed that age, baseline VA, number of injections, and early fluid resolution were the variables independently associated with visual outcomes at Years 1 and 2.

Conclusions

The EAGLE study analyzed the routine clinical practice management of patients with nAMD in Italy. The study suggested that visual outcomes in clinical practice may be improved with earlier diagnosis, higher number of injections, and accurate fluid resolution targeting during treatment induction.

Real-World Outcomes of Intravitreal Aflibercept for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Large-Scale Postmarketing Surveillance in Korea

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) in Asian patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in a real-world clinical setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this analysis of a prospective, regulatory, postmarketing surveillance study for IVT-AFL, 3115 patients with nAMD were included and followed for 8 months. The mean changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) were analyzed using last observation carried forward method. A post hoc subgroup analysis and a multivariate logistic regression analysis were also performed to assess factors related to treatment outcomes.

RESULTS

Mean BCVA improved from 0.62 to 0.51 logarithm of minimum angle resolution and mean CRT decreased from 383.3 to 289.7 μm, with a mean of 3.4 injections during the 8-month follow-up. In the subgroup analysis, patients who had received 3 initial monthly doses had significantly better anatomical improvements than those treated as needed. Patients with confirmed polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) had significantly better anatomical improvements and better visual recovery than those with other types of nAMD. The multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that age, injection number, PCV, and baseline BCVA were significantly associated with higher odds of gaining 3 lines at 8 months, and sex, injection number, PCV, and baseline CRT were associated with CRT ≤250 µm at 8 months. No new safety findings were identified.

CONCLUSION

IVT-AFL was effective and well tolerated in a real-world setting with a large number of Asian patients with nAMD. Number of injections and PCV were important determinants for improved treatment outcomes.

[Adherence to anti-VEGF treatment-Considerations and practical recommendations]

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies have identified a lack of treatment adherence as an important factor that often conflicts with the necessary number of anti-VEGF injections and therefore a better functional result.

OBJECTIVE

This article discusses approaches and possible measures to reduce the risk of late and infrequent intravitreal injections leading to the major issue of undertreatment.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

In the course of an expert dialogue, relevant parameters of treatment adherence and variables were identified. Meaningful processes were structured and assigned to organizational areas.

RESULTS

The compilation of meaningful measures enables practitioners to optimize their own implementation in different areas. Regular monitoring measures can identify the extent of treatment interruption and discontinuation. For specific indicators (treatments per time interval, longest pause interval, minimum coverage per unit time, delay) an effect on the development of visual function was demonstrated. Organizational measures, training of teams and referring physicians, redundant and iterative information transfer to patients have been proven in the experience of experts. The firm integration of these processes into the structures is facilitated by working with checklists.

CONCLUSION

An optimization of the processes is possible to improve the adherence and the functional results; however, interventional studies showing how adherence and persistence can be increased in the German treatment setting are still lacking.

Efficacy and safety of brolucizumab versus aflibercept in eyes with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy in Japanese participants of HAWK

Purpose

To compare the efficacy and safety of brolucizumab versus aflibercept in eyes with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) over 96 weeks in the HAWK study.

Design

HAWK was a global, 2-year, randomised, double-masked, multicentre phase III trial in participants with neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Methods

Of the Japanese participants with PCV, 39 received brolucizumab 6 mg and 30 received aflibercept 2 mg. After 3 monthly loading doses, brolucizumab-treated eyes received an injection every 12 weeks (q12w) but were adjusted to q8w if disease activity was detected. Aflibercept-treated eyes received fixed q8w dosing. Mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), the proportion of participants on q12w, retinal thickness, retinal fluid changes and safety were assessed to Week 96.

Results

Mean change in BCVA (early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) letters) from baseline to week 48/week 96 was+10.4/+11.4 for brolucizumab and +11.6/+11.1 for aflibercept. For brolucizumab-treated eyes, the probability of only q12w dosing after loading through week 48 was 76%, and 68% through week 96. Fluid resolution was greater with brolucizumab than aflibercept: respective proportions of eyes with intraretinal fluid and/or subretinal fluid were 7.7% and 30% at week 48% and 12.8% and 16.7% at week 96. Brolucizumab exhibited an overall well-tolerated safety profile despite a higher rate of intraocular inflammation compared with aflibercept.

Conclusion

In Japanese eyes with PCV, brolucizumab q12w/q8w monotherapy resulted in robust and consistent BCVA gains that were comparable to q8w aflibercept dosing. Anatomical outcomes favoured brolucizumab over aflibercept, with 76% of brolucizumab participants maintained on q12w dosing after loading to week 48.

Anti-VEGF Treatment Patterns in Patients With Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Clinical Practice

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To characterize on-label anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment patterns in patients with wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in clinical practice in the U.S.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective cohort analysis using administrative claims data from the IQVIA Open Source Databases. Treatment-naïve patients in the U.S. who received one or more wet AMD-related anti-VEGF injection from July 1, 2013, to April 30, 2017, were included. The main outcome was the injection interval closest to Month 12.

RESULTS

This study included 21,960 patients who initiated an anti-VEGF agent (ranibizumab, aflibercept, or bevacizumab): 5,489 initiated aflibercept and 4,253 initiated ranibizumab. Among ranibizumab, aflibercept, and all anti-VEGF eyes, 38.1% (n = 2,035), 33.5% (n = 3,262), and 40.0% (n = 12,505) of patient eyes had injection intervals of less than 8 weeks, respectively, at Month 12 with the mean (standard deviation) number of injections over 12 months being 8.0 (2.4), 7.6 (2.4), and 7.8 (2.5).

CONCLUSION

A substantial proportion of patients receive injections more frequently than every 8 weeks within the first year of treatment. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2021;52:263-272.].

Acceptability of intravitreal injections in geographic atrophy: protocol for a mixed-methods pilot study

INTRODUCTION

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a common cause of visual impairment, affecting central vision. Geographic atrophy (GA) is an advanced form of the non-neovascular (dry) type of AMD. Late-stage clinical trials suggest that intravitreal injections of novel therapeutics may slow down the rate of GA progression by up to 30% in 1 year, thus allowing people with GA to preserve central vision for a longer period. While intravitreal injections have become an established treatment modality for neovascular (wet) AMD, it is unknown whether patients with (more gradually progressing) GA would accept regular injections that slow down, but do not stop or reverse, vision loss. Therefore, this mixed-methods pilot study will aim to explore whether regular intravitreal injections will be acceptable as treatment for patients with GA, and the factors that may affect treatment acceptability.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A mixed-methods survey has been designed in collaboration with a GA patient advisory group. The survey comprises of structured questionnaires, semi-structured interview questions regarding patients' perceptions of intravitreal injections and the burden of treatment, and a task eliciting preferences between different potential treatments. Due to COVID-19 restrictions, this study will be conducted remotely by telephone. Thirty individuals will be recruited from NHS Medical Retina clinics at Central Middlesex Hospital, London. Half of the participants will be naïve to intravitreal injections, while half will have previous experience of intravitreal injections for neovascular (wet) AMD. Qualitative data analysis will be conducted using the Framework Method of analysis to identify key themes from participants' accounts.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study received Health Research Authority approval on 23 March 2021 (IRAS Project ID: 287824). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations to the medical retina community, as well as through dialogue with patients and macular disease charities.

Burden of disease assessment in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration in Spain: Results of the AMD-MANAGE study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The present study evaluates the burden of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) to Healthcare System and patients, describing the management and treatment effectiveness in routine clinical practice in Spain.

METHODS

Observational, non-interventional, cross-sectional, retrospective (24 months), multicentre study including patients who started treatment with licensed vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (anti-VEGF) for nAMD with a minimum follow up of 24 months.

RESULTS

126 evaluable patients were included with mean (SD) age of 79.1 (7.5) years. From diagnosis, it took a mean (SD) of 0.5 (0.5) months for the first treatment. Throughout 24 months, mean (SD) number of visits per patient was 16.0 (5.0), 9.4 (4.3) associated intravitreal injection. There were 1186 injection visits, 53.6% of them only with injection and 46.3% with injection and tests. After loading phase, preferred treatment regimens were T&E (46.0%), PRN (44.4%), fixed regimen (4.0%), and others (5.6%). Total number of visits in patients with T&E and PRN were 16.5 (5.7) and 15.5 (4.7), respectively. After complete loading phase, mean (SD) time between two consecutive treatment injections was 2.2 (1.6) months. 27.8% patients underwent a treatment change, being lack of response the most frequent reason to change (43.2%). Mean (SD) best-corrected visual acuity change was 2.1 (15.9) letters at 24 months.

CONCLUSION

This study showed an important burden to Healthcare System and patients related to monitoring visits. More efficacious and longer lasting treatments could be useful to increase treatment intervals, thus reducing the burden of patients and caregivers and the use of healthcare resources.

Long-Term Safety Evaluation of Continuous Intraocular Delivery of Aflibercept by the Intravitreal Gene Therapy Candidate ADVM-022 in Nonhuman Primates

Purpose

To evaluate the long-term safety of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) suppression with sustained aflibercept expression after a single intravitreal injection (IVI) of ADVM-022, an anti-VEGF gene therapy, in non-human primates (NHPs).

Methods

Non-human primates received bilateral IVI of ADVM-022, a gene therapy vector encoding aflibercept, a standard of care for the treatment of VEGF-based retinal disease. Aflibercept levels from ocular fluids and tissues were measured. Ocular inflammation was assessed by slit lamp biomicroscopy and fundoscopy. The integrity of the retinal structure was analyzed by optical coherence tomography and blue light fundus autofluorescence and electroretinography was performed to determine retinal function. Histologic evaluation of the retina was performed at the longest time point measured (2.5 years after injection).

Results

Sustained expression of aflibercept was noted out to the last time point evaluated. Mild to moderate inflammatory responses were observed, which trended toward spontaneous resolution without anti-inflammatory treatment. No abnormalities in retinal structure or function were observed, as measured by optical coherence tomography and electroretinography, respectively. RPE integrity was maintained throughout the study; no histologic abnormalities were observed 2.5 years after ADVM-022 IVI.

Conclusions

In non-human primates, long-term, sustained aflibercept expression and the resulting continuous VEGF suppression by a single IVI of ADVM-022, appears to be safe, with no measurable adverse effects on normal retinal structure and function evaluated out to 2.5 years.

Translational Relevance

Together with the results from previous ADVM-022 preclinical studies, these data support the evaluation of this gene therapy candidate in clinical trials as a potential durable treatment for various VEGF-mediated ophthalmic disorders.

A Safe GDNF and GDNF/BDNF Controlled Delivery System Improves Migration in Human Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells and Survival in Retinal Ganglion Cells: Potential Usefulness in Degenerative Retinal Pathologies

We assessed the sustained delivery effect of poly (lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA)/vitamin E (VitE) microspheres (MSs) loaded with glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) alone (GDNF-MSs) or combined with brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF; GDNF/BDNF-MSs) on migration of the human adult retinal pigment epithelial cell-line-19 (ARPE-19) cells, primate choroidal endothelial (RF/6A) cells, and the survival of isolated mouse retinal ganglion cells (RGCs). The morphology of the MSs, particle size, and encapsulation efficiencies of the active substances were evaluated. In vitro release, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) cell viability, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT) deoxyuridine dUTP nick-end labelling (TUNEL) apoptosis, functional wound healing migration (ARPE-19; migration), and (RF/6A; angiogenesis) assays were conducted. The safety of MS intravitreal injection was assessed using hematoxylin and eosin, neuronal nuclei (NeuN) immunolabeling, and TUNEL assays, and RGC in vitro survival was analyzed. MSs delivered GDNF and co-delivered GDNF/BDNF in a sustained manner over 77 days. The BDNF/GDNF combination increased RPE cell migration, whereas no effect was observed on RF/6A. MSs did not alter cell viability, apoptosis was absent in vitro, and RGCs survived in vitro for seven weeks. In mice, retinal toxicity and apoptosis was absent in histologic sections. This delivery strategy could be useful as a potential co-therapy in retinal degenerations and glaucoma, in line with future personalized long-term intravitreal treatment as different amounts (doses) of microparticles can be administered according to patients’ needs.

Two-year outcomes of intravitreal aflibercept in a Swiss routine treat and extend regimen for patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration

The aim of this observational study was to assess the use and outcome of intravitreal aflibercept in a treat and extend regimen in treatment-naïve neovascular AMD patients in routine practice. This both retrospective and prospective study was conducted in four larger Swiss retina clinics (ASTERIA study). The primary endpoint was the mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in ETDRS letters from baseline to 12 months. Between December 2017 and August 2018, 160 patients were included. For patients with available data, the mean change in BCVA was + 8.4 (± 14.4) letters at month 12 (n = 139) and + 5.0 (± 11.4) letters at month 24 (n = 95). A mean number of 8.3 (± 2.4) injections were administered within the first year and 5.4 (± 2.9) injections during the second year. On average, the observed treatment interval at month 12 was 63.3 (± 22.0) days and increased to 69.1 (± 28.6) days at month 24. For 37% of the patients, a treatment interval ≥ 12 weeks was attained at month 24. In conclusion,  intravitreal aflibercept in a Swiss real-life treat and extend regimen resulted in comparable anatomic and functional outcomes as were observed in the prospective registration trials of aflibercept for nAMD treatment.

Trends in Real-World Neovascular AMD Treatment Outcomes in the UK

Purpose

To report trends in real-world outcomes of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in the United Kingdom (UK) over the last decade.

Design

Systematic review.

Methods

Medline, PubMed, and Embase databases were searched from 9 April 2010 to 8 April 2020 for publications that met the inclusion criteria: treatment-naïve eyes, UK-only data and ≥1 year of follow-up. ICHOM (International Consortium for Health Outcome Measures) outcomes and study quality were assessed. Visual acuity (VA) trends were assessed in studies with ≥100 eyes at baseline.

Results

Twenty-six studies (n=25,761 eyes) were included, meeting 14–17 out of 20 Institute of Health Economics Quality Appraisal of Case Series checklist domains. Only ranibizumab and aflibercept outcome data were available. The mean injection number in the first year of treatment was 5.9 in publications from 2010 to 2015 and 7.1 from 2015 to 2020. Average baseline VA and mean one-year, two-year and three-year VA gains gradually improved over the last decade. Longer-term studies reported that the visual gains achieved in the first year of treatment were rarely maintained, with under-treatment a likely contributing factor.

Conclusion

UK real-world outcomes have improved over the last decade with improved service delivery and the adoption of more proactive treatment regimens but are still not always as impressive as registration clinical trial results. Access to longer-acting anti-VEGF therapies would reduce the treatment burden for patients, carers, and the healthcare system, potentially making replication of clinical trial results possible in the NHS.

Age-related macular degeneration masqueraders: From the obvious to the obscure

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is one of the leading causes of blindness worldwide with increasing prevalence owing to increased life expectancy. Intravitreal injections of antivascular endothelial growth factor agents are commonly used in exudative AMD and oral antioxidant medication for nonexudative AMD; however, many disorders mimic exudative and nonexudative AMD, and misdiagnosis can seriously affect the management of these patients. We summarize the demographics and clinical and imaging characteristics of each of the conditions that masquerade as AMD. As some of the conditions have features of AMD, a short update on the classical features of AMD is also included.

[The modified treat and extend scheme with injection blocks in intravitreal injection treatment : Retrospective analysis from the routine clinical application]

Hintergrund

Die regelmäßige Therapie mittels intravitrealer operativer Medikamentenapplikation (IVOM) und die damit verbundenen Kontrolluntersuchungen stellen für viele Patienten eine große Herausforderung dar, die bis zum Behandlungsabbruch führen kann. Das modifizierte blockweise Treat-and-Extend(TAE)-Schema verfolgt das Ziel, mit möglichst wenigen Kontrollvisiten stabile Netzhaut- und Visusbefunde zu erreichen und dadurch die Belastung der Patienten zu minimieren.

Methoden

Diese monozentrische retrospektive Studie untersuchte Behandlungsverläufe von insgesamt 387 Patienten mit neovaskulärer altersbedingter Makuladegeneration (AMD), diabetischem Makulaödem (DMÖ), Venenastverschluss (VAV) und Zentralvenenverschluss (ZVV), bei denen das TAE-Regime jeweils in 3er-Blöcken angewendet wurde. Primärer Endpunkt war das Erreichen eines Injektionsintervalls von 12 Wochen.

Ergebnisse

Durch die blockweise applizierte IVOM konnte die Netzhautdicke signifikant reduziert und der Visus verbessert werden. Über die verschiedenen Indikationen konnte im Mittel ein Behandlungsintervall von 2 Monaten erreicht werden.

Schlussfolgerung

Ein in 3er-Blöcken angepasstes TAE-Schema im Rahmen der IVOM kann bei reduzierter Patientenbelastung zu stabilen Netzhaut- und Visusbefunden führen.

Zusatzmaterial online

Zusätzliche Informationen sind in der Online-Version dieses Artikels (10.1007/s00347-020-01218-y) enthalten.

Real-Life Data in the Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Results from the Imaculaweb Registry Evaluated in a Single Italian Medical Retina Center

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> The aim of this study is to assess and compare the long-term clinical efficacy of anti-VEGF drugs using the Imaculaweb registry. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> In this observational study based on the Imaculaweb registry, outcome measures were the number of injections, the change in mean visual acuity (VA) and central macular thickness (CMT), and the time between diagnosis and the first injection. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In total, 126 eyes of 109 patients were included in the study. The mean VA was 49.4 ± 21.4, 54.1 ± 22.2, 51.6 ± 24.9, and 48.3 ± 25.7 letters at baseline and at the 1-, 2-, and 3-year follow-ups, respectively. Significant VA increases (<i>p</i> = 0.0002 for the first year and <i>p</i> = 0.045 for the second year) were documented at years 1 and 2 but not at year 3 (<i>p</i> = 0.8). The mean number of injections was 5.2, 2.6, and 2.3 at the 1-, 2-, and 3-year follow-ups, respectively. In the first year, 30% of the patients received at least 7 injections, while only 6.4% received &#x3c;3 injections. CMT decreased significantly during the overall follow-up period, and intra- and subretinal fluid decreased (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.0001). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Imaculaweb turned out to be an effective tool to collect and share clinical data as well as to monitor patient outcome.